Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-11 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 07:46:14PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of > > these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am > > starting to wonder if we should again

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-10 Thread Hayes, Graham
On 10/05/2016 20:20, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 5/9/2016 6:46 PM, Sean Dague wrote: >> On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: >>> After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of >>> these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am >>> starting to

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-10 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 5/9/2016 6:46 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am starting to wonder if we should again bring up the question of having

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-10 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-05-09 19:46:14 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: >> Honestly, I'm really liking that more of them are hitting the >> mailing list proper this time around. Discoverability is key. The >> mailing list is a shared

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-10 Thread Joshua Harlow
Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2016-05-09 19:46:14 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: Honestly, I'm really liking that more of them are hitting the mailing list proper this time around. Discoverability is key. The mailing list is a shared medium, archived forever. I feel the same (says the guy who is

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2016-05-09 19:46:14 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: > Honestly, I'm really liking that more of them are hitting the > mailing list proper this time around. Discoverability is key. The > mailing list is a shared medium, archived forever. I feel the same (says the guy who is still in the

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-10 Thread Amrith Kumar
> -Original Message- > From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] > Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:46 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs > > On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > After seeing

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-10 Thread Dave Walker
On 9 May 2016 at 23:37, Joshua Harlow wrote: > After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of these > (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am starting > to wonder if we should again bring up the question of having infra (and

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-09 Thread Anita Kuno
On 05/09/2016 07:33 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > On 10 May 2016 at 10:55, Anita Kuno wrote: >> On 05/09/2016 06:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >>> IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki >>> more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs? >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-09 Thread Sean Dague
On 05/09/2016 06:53 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 05/09/2016 05:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >> IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki >> more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs? > > We'd actually like to start using the wiki less, per the most recent >

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-09 Thread John Dickinson
On 9 May 2016, at 15:53, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 05/09/2016 05:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote: >> IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki >> more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs? > > We'd actually like to start using the wiki less, per the most recent

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-09 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-05-09 15:37:23 -0700: > After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of > these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am > starting to wonder if we should again bring up the question of having > infra

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-09 Thread Anita Kuno
On 05/09/2016 06:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki > more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs? > > -Rob Well we are actually moving away from the wiki. Currently new accounts are closed due to spammers using new

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-09 Thread Monty Taylor
On 05/09/2016 05:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote: > IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki > more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs? We'd actually like to start using the wiki less, per the most recent summit. Also, the wiki currently has new accounts

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-09 Thread Robert Collins
IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs? -Rob On 10 May 2016 at 10:37, Joshua Harlow wrote: > After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of these > (some on the ML,

[openstack-dev] Team blogs

2016-05-09 Thread Joshua Harlow
After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am starting to wonder if we should again bring up the question of having infra (and I guess the foundation?) support/provide a place for team blogs...