On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 07:46:14PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> > After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of
> > these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am
> > starting to wonder if we should again
On 10/05/2016 20:20, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 5/9/2016 6:46 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>>> After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of
>>> these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am
>>> starting to
On 5/9/2016 6:46 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of
these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am
starting to wonder if we should again bring up the question of having
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> On 2016-05-09 19:46:14 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
>> Honestly, I'm really liking that more of them are hitting the
>> mailing list proper this time around. Discoverability is key. The
>> mailing list is a shared
Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2016-05-09 19:46:14 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
Honestly, I'm really liking that more of them are hitting the
mailing list proper this time around. Discoverability is key. The
mailing list is a shared medium, archived forever.
I feel the same (says the guy who is
On 2016-05-09 19:46:14 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
> Honestly, I'm really liking that more of them are hitting the
> mailing list proper this time around. Discoverability is key. The
> mailing list is a shared medium, archived forever.
I feel the same (says the guy who is still in the
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
> Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 7:46 PM
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs
>
> On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> > After seeing
On 9 May 2016 at 23:37, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of these
> (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am starting
> to wonder if we should again bring up the question of having infra (and
On 05/09/2016 07:33 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 10 May 2016 at 10:55, Anita Kuno wrote:
>> On 05/09/2016 06:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>>> IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki
>>> more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs?
>>>
On 05/09/2016 06:53 PM, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 05:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>> IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki
>> more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs?
>
> We'd actually like to start using the wiki less, per the most recent
>
On 9 May 2016, at 15:53, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 05/09/2016 05:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
>> IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki
>> more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs?
>
> We'd actually like to start using the wiki less, per the most recent
Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2016-05-09 15:37:23 -0700:
> After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of
> these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am
> starting to wonder if we should again bring up the question of having
> infra
On 05/09/2016 06:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki
> more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs?
>
> -Rob
Well we are actually moving away from the wiki. Currently new accounts
are closed due to spammers using new
On 05/09/2016 05:45 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
> IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki
> more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs?
We'd actually like to start using the wiki less, per the most recent
summit. Also, the wiki currently has new accounts
IIRC mediawiki provides RSS of changes... maybe just using the wiki
more would be a good start, and have zero infra costs?
-Rob
On 10 May 2016 at 10:37, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of these
> (some on the ML,
After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of
these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am
starting to wonder if we should again bring up the question of having
infra (and I guess the foundation?) support/provide a place for team
blogs...
16 matches
Mail list logo