@ john,
Thank you for your comments.
About blueprint volume-delete-protect :
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97034/, I think deferred deletion for volumes
is valuable, it seems to me that should be sufficient.
Firstly currently in cinder, calling the API of deleting volume means
the volume will be deleted immediately. If the user specify a wrong volume by
mistake, the data in the volume may be lost forever. To avoid this, we hope to
add a deferred deletion mechanism for volumes. So for a certain amount of time,
volumes can be restored after the user find a misuse of deleting volume. So I
think deferred deletion for volumes is valuable
Moreover, there are deferred deletion implements for instance in nova
and image in glance, I think it is very common feature to protected important
resource.
So I would like to promote this blueprint as soon.
@all,
I have submit this blueprint https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97034/, It
introduces some complexity, still exists different options. So I would like to
get more feedback about this bp.
Thanks.
Zhou Yu
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
