you probably want to report this on ssbench github's issues.
Chmouel.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:22 AM, Snider, Tim tim.sni...@netapp.com wrote:
I recently downloaded swift 1.9.1-dev.
swift-bench gets the following error. What can I change to get this working
sucessfully?
Thanks,
Tim
Hey!
I am trying to get the meters from ceilometer programmatically using java
with the help of the SDK's provided by openstack.
While trying to execute the command mvn clean install or mvn clean install
assembly:assembly, it is asking me for a gpg passphrase. Which passphrase
is it talking
We are unable to get an IP address when a VM gets launched and the below
DHCP error is observed in the Dashboard logs
The setup in done on Fedora 18 using Openstack Grizzly. Its a 2 node setup,
with Network+ Controller node having 3 NIC's, and Compute node having 2
NIC's. Tried configuring
Robert Collins wrote:
Official Title: OpenStack Deployment
PTL: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net
Mission Statement:
Develop and maintain tooling and infrastructure able to
deploy OpenStack in production, using OpenStack itself wherever
On 07/10/2013 01:36 AM, David Ripton wrote:
On 07/09/2013 12:46 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 07/08/2013 08:32 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/08/2013 04:50 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 15:53 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
Since python-sqlalchemy 0.8.2 has been uploaded to
On 10 July 2013 20:01, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
Official Title: OpenStack Deployment
PTL: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net
Mission Statement:
Develop and maintain tooling and infrastructure able to
Ok, having so much pressure on db implementation, I think I'm just going to
post in-memory implementation and we'll decide if it will fit our needs.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Mark
2013/7/9 Mark McClain mark.mccl...@dreamhost.com:
This process change is now completed for all integrated projects.
I updated the wiki so that it reflects the new usage of the blueprints
fields:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints
Regards,
--
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
___
OpenStack-dev mailing
Hi,
Any ideas on this one ? Maybe I should forward this email to a more
specific ML ?
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Jordan Pittier jpitt...@octo.com wrote:
Hi guys,
As you may know :
* with Quantum, secgroups are uniquely identified by UUID.
* with Nova-Net, secgroups are uniquely
On Tue, Jul 09 2013, Jobin Raju George wrote:
The reason I initiated to contribute the XSD was most of the other
components(nova, keystone, glance, etc.) have their XSD's in the
repository, so assuming they were contributed by people like me(and updated
from time to time by the same or other
Ok, fine. I agree, its better since that would make sure both the XSD and
the api agree with each other. Thanks your time!
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09 2013, Jobin Raju George wrote:
The reason I initiated to contribute the XSD was
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
This is some preliminary works to move novaclient to use
keystoneclient instead of implementing its own[1] client to keystone.
If the OS_AUTH_SYSTEM feature was really needed[2] we should then
moving it to
Hi,
Sorry for late cut-in,
I agree that dynamic configuration through the API is not easy to implement.
At now, conf-based approach without database (option-1) looks the best way
unless we
don't have needs for dynamic configuration thru the API.
1) From logic perspective service provider could
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Ilya Kharin ikha...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi all.
In my opinion it is about things that can live in one form or another,
because
in some cases there is a need to place an instance in the same place where
its
block device is located or will be attached. Both
Oops - that's a swift-bench error not ssbench.
sorry
From: Snider, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 9:23 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: swift-bench 1.9.1-dev - AttributeError: Values instance has no
attribute 'containers'
I recently downloaded swift 1.9.1-dev.
swift-bench
On 07/10/2013 08:34 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 4 July 2013 03:54, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Thanks for starting this thread.
I was pushing for the weight function. It seems much more appropriate
for a cloud environment than the filter. It's an optimization that is
always
I also won't make the meeting today. I have now started writing code for
the Tail-f NCS mechanism driver based on Andre's great work. Thanks Andre !
On 10 July 2013 06:53, Andre Pech ap...@aristanetworks.com wrote:
Thanks Kyle,
I'm unfortunately going to be on a plane during tomorrow's
Hi Robert,
What's your plan for documenting the efforts so that others can do this in
their environments? Is there any documentation currently for which you can
send links?
The Doc team is especially interested in configuration docs and
installation docs as those are the toughest to produce in a
Basically #2 makes sense to me.
2) Enrich/enhance the NeutronServer exceptions with a type and detail
properties.
This way, when a NeutronServer exception is serialized and sent to
python-neutronclient,
the specific NeutronClient exception can be raised (and then sent to
nova-api).
What
John Griffith wrote:
I ran into an issue with Cinder the other week and it turned out it was
due to some conflicts with keystoneclient version.
Long story short, the issue is that Cinder did the straight sync over
from the common-requirements file which placed an upper bound on
Thanks Engene,
I have looked at your new patch. It looks nice.
The router-provider association can be merged into service-provider
association,
but it can be done in another patch and I can do it.
I am also working to support multiple router implementations in NEC plugin
using this framework.
It
Just a reminder today is the Cinder bug squash day!
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/BugSquashingDay/20130710
-Mike Perez!
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:49 AM, John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote:
Hey Everyone,
So there have been a number of new bug reports coming in the last
HI folks
I would like to ask the review criteria in the community.
Should we use exception for non-exceptional cases when we can use
parameter checking?
Example1: Default value for array index
try:
value = list[5]
except IndexError:
value = 'default_value'
This can be also written
Hi Ivar,
thanks for your interest in Openstack and Neutron.
A few replies inline; I hope you'll find them useful.
Salvatore
On 10 July 2013 02:40, Ivar Lazzaro i...@embrane.com wrote:
Hi,
My name is Ivar Lazzaro, I’m an Italian developer currently employed at
Embrane.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
HI folks
I would like to ask the review criteria in the community.
Should we use exception for non-exceptional cases when we can use
parameter checking?
Example1: Default value for array index
try:
value = list[5]
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 11:01 -0700, Nachi Ueno wrote:
HI folks
I would like to ask the review criteria in the community.
Should we use exception for non-exceptional cases when we can use
parameter checking?
Example1: Default value for array index
try:
value = list[5]
except
On Jul 10, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Hi Ivar,
thanks for your interest in Openstack and Neutron.
A few replies inline; I hope you'll find them useful.
Salvatore
On 10 July 2013 02:40, Ivar Lazzaro i...@embrane.com wrote:
Hi,
My name is Ivar
Hi Mark
Thank you for your answering
I don't think this statement contradicts the intent of EAFP.
I got it :)
Personally, I prefer not to use exception for such cases.
My instinct is the same, but EAFP does seem to be the python way. There
are times I can tolerate the EAFP approach but,
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-07-10 at 11:01 -0700, Nachi Ueno wrote:
Personally, I prefer not to use exception for such cases.
The key here is personally. I don't think we have to agree on all style
issues.
My instinct is the
Does anyone know how to disable keystone authorization in ceilometer-api?
Is there a ceilometer.conf option for this?
Thank you
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi Thomas
Thank you for your reply.
The key here is personally. I don't think we have to agree on all style
issues.
personally is why I'm asking it for communities.
IMO, we should agree on the style issue as much as we can. (Eg pep8, flake8)
for more consistant review.
However, I also agree
On 07/10/2013 02:01 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
HI folks
I would like to ask the review criteria in the community.
Should we use exception for non-exceptional cases when we can use
parameter checking?
Example1: Default value for array index
try:
value = list[5]
except IndexError:
value
The Marconi project team holds a weekly meeting in #openstack-meeting-alt
on Thursdays, 1900 UTC.
The next meeting is tomorrow, July 11.
Everyone is welcome. However, please take a minute to review the wiki
before attending for the first time:
http://wiki.openstack.org/marconi
## Agenda (60
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:57 PM, David Ripton drip...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/2013 02:01 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
HI folks
I would like to ask the review criteria in the community.
Should we use exception for non-exceptional cases when we can use
parameter checking?
Example1: Default
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 3:57 PM, David Ripton drip...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/10/2013 02:01 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote:
HI folks
I would like to ask the review criteria in the community.
Should we use exception
On 07/10/2013 03:56 PM, Matthew Farrellee wrote:
Ivan,
snip
No comments on the email itself ... but I see that there's a separate
mailing list (savanna-all). If the intention is for this project to
eventually apply for incubation, I would encourage discussions on
openstack-dev instead of
On 07/10/2013 01:04 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com
mailto:cbky...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The following is a list of API extensions for which there are no
plans to port. Please shout if you think any of them needs
Yesterday in the very exciting run around to figure out why the gate was
broken, we realized something interesting. Because of the way the gate
process pip requirements (one project at a time), on a current gate run
we actually install and uninstall python-keystoneclient 4 times in a
normal
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Sean Dague wrote:
Yesterday in the very exciting run around to figure out why the gate was
broken, we realized something interesting. Because of the way the gate
process pip requirements (one project at a time), on a current gate run we
actually install and
A useful tool that anvil has built into it (thanks to aababilov). It might
be useful in this situation.
https://github.com/stackforge/anvil/tree/master/tools#multipip
It might be useful to use said tool (or a derivative) to detect this kind
of version conflict earlier rather than later??
It is
On Jul 4, 2013, at 8:26 PM, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote:
On 4 July 2013 23:42, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
Seems like a tweak would be to identify virtual IPs as separate to the
primary IP on a port:
you don't need to permit spoofing of the actual host IP for
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20130717T19Z
DTEND:20130717T20Z
DTSTAMP:20130711T015507Z
ORGANIZER;CN=peter.a.porta...@gmail.com:mailto:peter.a.porta...@gmail.com
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20130717T19Z
DTEND:20130717T20Z
DTSTAMP:20130711T015507Z
ORGANIZER;CN=peter.a.porta...@gmail.com:mailto:peter.a.porta...@gmail.com
On 07/09/2013 07:33 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 07/08/2013 05:18 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/01/2013 01:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
The way the new keystone-manage command token_flush works right now
is quite broken by MySQL and InnoDB's gap locking behavior:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/1188378
On 07/10/2013 06:56 AM, Akshat Kakkar wrote:
I have added 2 tables to keystone.
This should be done in a migration, and should be tested using the
test_db_update.py file.
I have methods which do the read/write/update/delete of records in
these tables.
PLease explain. We are not doing
I want to write 3 new Jenkins gate tests: Run the Keystone unit tests
against
1. A live LDAP server
2. MySQL
3. Postgresql
Right now, we know that the unit tests will fail against the live DBs,
so we want those two to be non-voting. The Live LDAP one should be the
scheme as set up by
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2013-07-10 19:14:45 -0700:
On 07/09/2013 09:51 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
PostgreSQL doesn't do gap locks, but instead you have to deal with
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SSI : the transaction that is deleting
1M rows, for instance, will have a query
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2013-07-10 19:17:24 -0700:
On 07/09/2013 07:33 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 07/08/2013 05:18 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/01/2013 01:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
The way the new keystone-manage command token_flush works right now
is quite broken by MySQL and
On 07/10/2013 11:01 PM, Clark Boylan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
I want to write 3 new Jenkins gate tests: Run the Keystone unit tests
against
1. A live LDAP server
2. MySQL
3. Postgresql
Right now, we know that the unit tests will fail
On 07/10/2013 11:11 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Adam Young's message of 2013-07-10 19:17:24 -0700:
On 07/09/2013 07:33 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 07/08/2013 05:18 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 07/01/2013 01:35 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
The way the new keystone-manage command token_flush works
That's great, lets see if I find myself on #openstack-doc. Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Anne Gentle
annegen...@justwriteclick.comwrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
The instructions for getting set up to contribute to
Clint suggested we do a mid-cycle sprint at the weekly meeting a
fortnight ago, but ETIME and stuff - so I'm following up.
HP would be delighted to host a get-together of TripleO contributors
[or 'I will be contributing soon, honest'] folk.
We're proposing a late August / early Sept time - a
52 matches
Mail list logo
