Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] blueprint for host/hypervisor location information

2013-10-01 Thread Alex Glikson
Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote on 01/10/2013 06:58:10 AM: Alex Glikson glik...@il.ibm.com wrote on 09/29/2013 03:30:35 PM: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote on 29/09/2013 08:02:00 PM: Another reason to prefer host is that we have other resources to locate besides

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Keystone][glance] Keystone V3 Domains and Nova

2013-10-01 Thread Henry Nash
I think an obvious first step of domain support outside keystone is for images. Today, I believe, an image can be global or project based. There is definitely a use case for a third state of being domain based - and hence available to all projects in that domain, but not to those in other

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software orchestration)

2013-10-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Georgy Okrokvertskhov's message of 2013-09-30 11:44:26 -0700: Hi, I am working on the OpenStack project Murano which actually had to solve the same problem with software level orchestration. Right now Murano has a DSL language which allows you to define a workflow for a complex

Re: [openstack-dev] [scheduler] [heat] Policy specifics (for holistic infrastructure scheduling)

2013-10-01 Thread Clint Byrum
Mike, this has been really fun, but it is starting to feel like a rabbit hole. The case for having one feels legitimate. However, at this point, I think someone will need to actually build it, or the idea is just a pipe dream. Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2013-09-30 19:21:22 -0700:

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software orchestration)

2013-10-01 Thread Robert Collins
On 1 October 2013 19:31, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: TripleO meets at 2000 UTC every Tuesday. 1900UTC. :) -Rob -- Robert Collins rbtcoll...@hp.com Distinguished Technologist HP Converged Cloud ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate issues - what you can do to help

2013-10-01 Thread Alan Pevec
1) Please *do not* Approve or Reverify stable/* patches. The pyparsing requirements conflict with neutron client from earlier in the week is still not resolved on stable/*. Also there's an issue with quantumclient and Nova stable/grizzly:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Spam] Heat stack-create fails in TripleO devtest environment

2013-10-01 Thread hideyasu hayashi
Thank you for your answer Clint. I try to debug .and, I set up TripleO by real hadware to use. 2013/10/1 Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com Excerpts from hideyasu hayashi's message of 2013-09-30 18:29:24 -0700: Dear List, Hi, I set up TripleO devtest environment on VMware(Ubuntu 12.04.3

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software orchestration)

2013-10-01 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi Mike and Zane, Le 27/09/2013 15:58, Mike Spreitzer a écrit : Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 09/27/2013 08:24:49 AM: Your diagrams clearly show scheduling happening in a separate stage to (infrastructure) orchestration, which is to say that at the point where resources are

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] Client Auth Plugins and changes in how clients communicate.

2013-10-01 Thread Jamie Lennox
All, So I wrote out an article the other day on the background to the keystoneclient changes that I've been trying to get through. Please take a look: http://www.jamielennox.net/blog/2013/09/27/apiclient-communications/ I'm hoping that it gives a better understanding of the concepts and

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software orchestration)

2013-10-01 Thread Thomas Spatzier
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 01.10.2013 08:31:44 - Excerpt: From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 01.10.2013 08:33 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [scheduler] Bringing things together for Icehouse (now featuring software

Re: [openstack-dev] Waiting for someone to verify/look into a bug I have opened for Glance Client tool

2013-10-01 Thread GROSZ, Maty (Maty)
All, you can view the bug here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1222369 Thanks, Maty. -Original Message- From: Iccha Sethi [mailto:iccha.se...@rackspace.com] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 17:51 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Waiting for

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate issues - what you can do to help

2013-10-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Alan Pevec wrote: 1) Please *do not* Approve or Reverify stable/* patches. The pyparsing requirements conflict with neutron client from earlier in the week is still not resolved on stable/*. Also there's an issue with quantumclient and Nova stable/grizzly:

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Kicking TripleO up a notch

2013-10-01 Thread Robert Collins
Warning, this is a little long, but it's the distillation of a 2.mumble hour call I had late last week with Devananda and Clint. It's a proposal: please do comment and critique it. The tl;dr read is: - we've been doing good work - but most of us are currently focused on the tech rather than the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Libvirt] Virtio-Serial support for Nova libvirt driver

2013-10-01 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 02:25:30PM -0700, Ravi Chunduru wrote: Alessandro, I agree with you. I created a Blueprint. Let us collaborate and achieve this on all types of hypervisors. All, Here is the link for the BP as discussed.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] [Docs] Documentation PTL Candidacy

2013-10-01 Thread atul jha
+1 On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Emilien Macchi emilien.mac...@enovance.com wrote: +1 Anne is doing without any doubt an amazing job on OpenStack manuals. Thank you Anne, Emilien Macchi # OpenStack Engineer // eNovance Inc.

[openstack-dev] Reminder: Project release status meeting - 21:00 UTC

2013-10-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Today in the project/release status meeting, we expect a busy meeting as we examine the last blockers before RC1. That includes looking into the gate flaky tests that have been pleguing our velocity lately. In order to issue the RC1s in the near future, we may have to restrict gating to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Kicking TripleO up a notch

2013-10-01 Thread Robert Collins
On 1 October 2013 21:37, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: - https://trello.com/tripleo as an experimental kanban for this [1] This was private; sorry - fixed! Also, I forgot to include a link to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TripleO/TripleOCloud which is draft documentation

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] [Docs] Documentation PTL Candidacy

2013-10-01 Thread Vivek Varghese Cherian
Hi, Anne Gentle has been working consistently with me and my team from the time we released the OpenStack Beginner's Guide Diablo and Essex releases. Her work with Openstack manual project is well known through out the community. I am supporting Anne Gentle's candidature for OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate issues - what you can do to help

2013-10-01 Thread Gary Kotton
Yes, it should. I'll mark the bug as a stable backport Thanks On 10/1/13 10:51 AM, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Gary, 2013/9/29 Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com: Not related to the stable branches, but related to trunk. At the moment I am working on

[openstack-dev] trove is already a source package in Debian and a Python module in PyPi

2013-10-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, I have just found out that there's already a source package called trove in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/trove Lucky, I don't think it will clash with OpenStack trove since it produces libtrove-java* .deb files, though that's quite annoying. The source package for OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [scheduler] blueprint for host/hypervisor location information

2013-10-01 Thread Mike Spreitzer
Maybe the answer is hiding in plain sight: host aggregates. This is a concept we already have, and it allows identification of arbitrary groupings for arbitrary purposes.___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [scheduler] [heat] Policy specifics (for holistic infrastructure scheduling)

2013-10-01 Thread Mike Spreitzer
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 10/01/2013 02:38:53 AM: From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 10/01/2013 02:40 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [scheduler] [heat] Policy specifics (for holistic infrastructure scheduling) Mike,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Keystone][glance] Keystone V3 Domains and Nova

2013-10-01 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 1:17 AM, Henry Nash hen...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote: I think an obvious first step of domain support outside keystone is for images. Today, I believe, an image can be global or project based. There is definitely a use case for a third state of being domain based - and

[openstack-dev] Scheduler sub-group meeting on 10/1

2013-10-01 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Don is on vacation. Lets try and have the meeting today. Topics that come to mind: 1. Consolidating ideas regarding scheduling API's that we can propose for summit – it would be great if we could come with a crystalized proposal for the community 2. On the mail list there has been a lot

Re: [openstack-dev] trove is already a source package in Debian and a Python module in PyPi

2013-10-01 Thread Michael Basnight
On Oct 1, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, I have just found out that there's already a source package called trove in Debian: http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/trove Lucky, I don't think it will clash with OpenStack trove since it produces libtrove-java* .deb files,

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova Migrate/Resize Libvirt Methods

2013-10-01 Thread Lingxian Kong
Good idea, I'm very interested in that! 2013/10/1 Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com On Sep 30, 2013, at 1:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 02:11:36PM -0400, Solly Ross wrote: Hello Fellow OpenStackers, I was working on a bug (

Re: [openstack-dev] trove is already a source package in Debian and a Python module in PyPi

2013-10-01 Thread Nicholas Chase
On 10/1/2013 10:53 AM, Michael Basnight wrote: Well this sucks. Im not sure im a fan of renaming it because of the previous existence of a package. Renaming is not fun. Ill let the more experienced openstack peoples help decide on this... Certainly it's not fun, but wouldn't it be easier

Re: [openstack-dev] trove is already a source package in Debian and a Python module in PyPi

2013-10-01 Thread Michael Basnight
On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Nicholas Chase wrote: On 10/1/2013 10:53 AM, Michael Basnight wrote: Well this sucks. Im not sure im a fan of renaming it because of the previous existence of a package. Renaming is not fun. Ill let the more experienced openstack peoples help decide on

[openstack-dev] [openstack][neutron] Handling issues unlikely to happen with the current code

2013-10-01 Thread Cristian Tomoiaga
Hello, I am wondering if we should handle potential issues (unlikely to happen with the current code) now or wait to see what happens with the code in the future ? What I am referring to can be seen for example in neutron/db/db_base_plugin_v2.py in _recycle_ip if we try to recycle the same IP

Re: [openstack-dev] trove is already a source package in Debian and a Python module in PyPi

2013-10-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/01/2013 10:02 PM, Jonathan Dowland wrote: On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:45:17PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Since I have already uploaded python-troveclient (currently waiting in the FTP master's NEW queue), OpenStack troveclient will be in Sid, but if some day, someone wants to upload

[openstack-dev] [Trove] vagrant vbox and vmware developer environment support

2013-10-01 Thread Craig Vyvial
We have vagrant working with virtual box to start up a trove development environment. This was tested with VirtualBox on an Ubuntu machine but should work with any other environment as well. This is nice and should benefit the community to setup trove easily in multiple environments. This repo

Re: [openstack-dev] Gate issues - what you can do to help

2013-10-01 Thread Adam Gandelman
On 10/01/2013 12:02 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: 1) Please *do not* Approve or Reverify stable/* patches. The pyparsing requirements conflict with neutron client from earlier in the week is still not resolved on stable/*. Also there's an issue with quantumclient and Nova stable/grizzly:

Re: [openstack-dev] trove is already a source package in Debian and a Python module in PyPi

2013-10-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 10/01/2013 11:23 PM, Michael Basnight wrote: On Oct 1, 2013, at 8:00 AM, Nicholas Chase wrote: On 10/1/2013 10:53 AM, Michael Basnight wrote: Well this sucks. Im not sure im a fan of renaming it because of the previous existence of a package. Renaming is not fun. Ill let the more

[openstack-dev] Requirements syncing job is live

2013-10-01 Thread Monty Taylor
Hey all! The job to automatically propose syncs from the openstack/requirements repo went live today - as I'm sure you all noticed, since pretty much everyone got a patch of at least some size. The job works the same way as the translations job - it will propose a patch any time the global repo

Re: [openstack-dev] trove is already a source package in Debian and a Python module in PyPi

2013-10-01 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, First of all, before I reply, I'd like to tell that hopefully, I believe we're fine in this specific case (at least on the Debian side of things). Though it really shouldn't have happen, and I believe it's my role to warn everybody about the risks. On 10/02/2013 12:02 AM, Monty Taylor wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] trove is already a source package in Debian and a Python module in PyPi

2013-10-01 Thread Michael Basnight
Thx for getting this squared away zigo!! On Oct 1, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, First of all, before I reply, I'd like to tell that hopefully, I believe we're fine in this specific case (at least on the Debian side of things). Though it really shouldn't have happen, and I

[openstack-dev] [Tuskar UI] Wireframes for Node, Rack, and Resource Class Details pages

2013-10-01 Thread Liz Blanchard
Hi All, Over the last few weeks, I've been working on compiling a list of metrics and representing these metrics via wireframes that are important to show to users on the Node, Rack(Logical Group), and Resource Class details pages in Tuskar. These have been designed keeping the metrics that

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][VPNaaS] VPNaaS team meeting

2013-10-01 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Neutron VPNaaS folks In havana, IPsec site-to-site model and reference driver is merged. Let's discuss next step! :P I have created a page for this discussion. so could you add your bp or thought or workitem on this etherpad page. https://etherpad.openstack.org/NeutronVPNaaSIceHouse I have

Re: [openstack-dev] trove is already a source package in Debian and a Python module in PyPi

2013-10-01 Thread Monty Taylor
On 10/01/2013 01:40 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hi, First of all, before I reply, I'd like to tell that hopefully, I believe we're fine in this specific case (at least on the Debian side of things). Though it really shouldn't have happen, and I believe it's my role to warn everybody about

Re: [openstack-dev] Meeting Tuesday October 1st at 19:00 UTC

2013-10-01 Thread Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph l...@princessleia.com wrote: The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting tomorrow, Tuesday October 1st, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Minutes:

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] *tuskar* moving to openstack/

2013-10-01 Thread Robert Collins
Infra have a move slot this weekend and *tuskar* are now queued up to move at that point. Once we've moved them, they will have their test runs coerced to use the official mirror and requirements sets; we may find that breaks current tests that are using the looser rules from stackforge - if so,

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [ml2] devstack now defaults to the ML2 plugin

2013-10-01 Thread Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
Folks: Just an update regarding the change to move devstack to default to the ML2 Neutron plugin instead of the OVS plugin. The patch [1] merged yesterday. Full tempest tests were passed with this, but just a heads up for those using devstack without specifying a Neutron plugin specifically.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [ml2] devstack now defaults to the ML2 plugin

2013-10-01 Thread Nachi Ueno
Congrat! 2013/10/1 Kyle Mestery (kmestery) kmest...@cisco.com: Folks: Just an update regarding the change to move devstack to default to the ML2 Neutron plugin instead of the OVS plugin. The patch [1] merged yesterday. Full tempest tests were passed with this, but just a heads up for those

Re: [openstack-dev] [TROVE] Thoughts on DNS refactoring, Designate integration.

2013-10-01 Thread Ilya Sviridov
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Tim Simpson tim.simp...@rackspace.comwrote: Hi fellow Trove devs, With the Designate project ramping up, its time to refactor the ancient DNS code that's in Trove to work with Designate. The good news is since the beginning, it has been possible to add new

Re: [openstack-dev] [TROVE] Thoughts on DNS refactoring, Designate integration.

2013-10-01 Thread Michael Basnight
On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Ilya Sviridov isviri...@mirantis.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Tim Simpson tim.simp...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi fellow Trove devs, With the Designate project ramping up, its time to refactor the ancient DNS code that's in Trove to work with

Re: [openstack-dev] [TROVE] Thoughts on DNS refactoring, Designate integration.

2013-10-01 Thread Tim Simpson
Ilya you make a good point. We shouldn't spend time massively change the DNS code if we'll just have to do it again so that HEAT can do everything for us. I echo Mike's comments though that if for some reason someone wants Designate support before we get HEAT integrated they should be able to

[openstack-dev] Instances running on VMware ESXi unable to get ip by dhcp

2013-10-01 Thread openstack learner
Hi all, I read a similar topic was discussed before but it seems like no specific and clear solution is provided in that discussion, anyone has the same issue before and already solved it? According to the vmware vsphere networking instruction, I create a port group with the same name as the

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar and releases

2013-10-01 Thread Robert Collins
We'd like to get tuskar projects doing releases sooner rather than later. For python-tuskarclient, this is pretty much a no-brainer : we just need to start doing it. However, for tuskar-ui and tuskar it's more complex. # tuskar This is an API service; whats the story for non-integrated projects

Re: [openstack-dev] Requirements syncing job is live

2013-10-01 Thread ZhiQiang Fan
great job! thanks (how about auto sync from oslo too? - projects.txt: projects want to be automatically synced from oslo - heads.txt: HEAD for each module in oslo whenever module maintainer think current module is strong enough to publish, then he/she can edit the heads.txt of that module line,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TROVE] Thoughts on DNS refactoring, Designate integration.

2013-10-01 Thread Vipul Sabhaya
On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Michael Basnight mbasni...@gmail.com wrote: On Oct 1, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Ilya Sviridov isviri...@mirantis.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Tim Simpson tim.simp...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi fellow Trove devs, With the Designate project ramping up,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [ml2] devstack now defaults to the ML2 plugin

2013-10-01 Thread Henry Gessau
Richard, Please look at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/ML2 If anything is unclear or doesn't work please follow up so we can tweak the wiki. -- Henry On Tue, Oct 01, at 9:33 pm Richard Woo (richardwoo2...@gmail.com) wrote: Kyle, what is the proper way to configure ML2 plugin (I plan

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Configuration API BP

2013-10-01 Thread Michael Basnight
On Oct 1, 2013, at 7:19 PM, Vipul Sabhaya wrote: So from this API, I see that a configuration is a standalone resource that could be applied to N number of instances. It's not clear to me what the API is for 'applying' a configuration to an existing instance.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar and releases

2013-10-01 Thread Monty Taylor
On 10/01/2013 08:08 PM, Robert Collins wrote: We'd like to get tuskar projects doing releases sooner rather than later. For python-tuskarclient, this is pretty much a no-brainer : we just need to start doing it. Yup. Just do it. However, for tuskar-ui and tuskar it's more complex. #

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Tuskar and releases

2013-10-01 Thread Robert Collins
On 2 October 2013 18:20, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: # tuskar-ui This is a Horizon plugin - http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/tuskar-ui/tree/docs/install.rst#n57 - so it's not super clear to me how to make releases of it. Should it really just be in the Horizon tree?