Thank you Noorul. I looked at the review. My question is that in
openstackcomputeshell.main which line call the v1_1/ shell.py.function?
Thanks
Al
On Oct 10, 2013, at 9:03 PM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote:
A L la6...@gmail.com writes:
Dear Openstack Dev Gurus,
I am trying
Alex la6...@gmail.com writes:
Thank you Noorul. I looked at the review. My question is that in
openstackcomputeshell.main which line call the v1_1/ shell.py.function?
I would look at get_subcommand_parser() method.
Thanks and Regards
Noorul
On Oct 10, 2013, at 9:03 PM, Noorul Islam K M
Yes , this method seems to look for the corresponding action but still doesn't
seem to be the one actually calling them.
Regards
Al
On Oct 10, 2013, at 11:07 PM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote:
Alex la6...@gmail.com writes:
Thank you Noorul. I looked at the review. My question
Regarding Alex's question of which component does holistic infrastructure
scheduling, I hesitate to simply answer heat. Heat is about
orchestration, and infrastructure scheduling is another matter. I have
attempted to draw pictures to sort this out, see
Hello everyone,
Due to various issues and regressions detected in RC1 testing, we just
created a new Havana release candidate for OpenStack Image Service
(Glance).
You can find the RC2 tarball and the list of fixed bugs at:
https://launchpad.net/glance/havana/havana-rc2
This is hopefully the
Hi All,
(I already posted this on openstack mail list, but perhaps it's more a
developer stuff :))
Some Tricky questions I ask help for (email 1 of 2):
Quantum Network object
In the openstack networking guide-Using Openstack compute with
Openstack- Advanced VM creation
Hi All,
(I already posted this on openstack mail list, but perhaps it's more a
developer stuff :))
Some Tricky questions I ask help for (email 2 of 2):
(please refer to a scenario with Openstack+Quantum, so we can have complex
networks)
Nova Compute
Are booted VMs independent by other
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Marco Fornaro marco.forn...@huawei.comwrote:
Hi All,
** **
(I already posted this on openstack mail list, but perhaps it’s more a
developer stuff J)
Some Tricky questions I ask help for (email 1 of 2):
** **
** **
*Quantum Network
Joshua Hesketh wrote:
I've been reviewing this change which is currently proposed for master
and I think it needs to be considered for the next Havana RC.
Change I3e080c30: Fix resource length in project_user_quotas table
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47299/
The bug was properly tagged
Hello.
My name is Rucia for Samsung SDS.
Now I am in trouble in cinder volume deleting.
I am developing for supporting big data storage in lvm
But it takes too much time for deleting of cinder lvm volume because of dd.
Cinder volume is 200GB for supporting hadoop master data.
When i delete
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Marco Fornaro marco.forn...@huawei.comwrote:
Hi All,
** **
(I already posted this on openstack mail list, but perhaps it’s more a
developer stuff J)
Some Tricky questions I ask help for (email 2 of 2):
** **
(please refer to a scenario
But if there are two
physical NIC's which were diced up with SRIOV, then VM's on the diced
parts of the first physical NIC cannot communicate easily with the
VM's on the diced parts of the second physical NIC. So a native
implementation has to be there on the Compute Node which will aid this
Alex la6...@gmail.com writes:
Yes , this method seems to look for the corresponding action but still
doesn't seem to be the one actually calling them.
Are you looking for this which is inside **main** method?
args = subcommand_parser.parse_args(argv)
Thanks and Regards
Noorul
Regards
Al
TC elections are underway and will remain open for you to cast your vote
until at least 23:59 UTC on Thursday, October 17.
If you are a Foundation individual member and had a commit in one of the
official OpenStack program projects over the Grizzly-Havana timeframe
(from 2012-09-27 to 2013-09-26,
Hi Teams,
Please suggest and guide for starting to contribute in development. About
me - I have been working on L2/L3 protocol, SNMP, NMS development and ready
to contribute as a full timer to openstack.
PS : My interest lies in LB and MPLS. Any pointers to respective teams will
help a lot.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 4:01 AM, P Balaji-B37839 b37...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi,
Current OVS Agent is creating tunnel with dst_port as the port configured in
INI file on Compute Node. If all the compute nodes on VXLAN network are
configured for DEFAULT port it is fine.
When any of the
On 10/10/2013 08:43 PM, Tim Smith wrote:
snip
Again, I don't have any vested interest in this discussion, except that
I believe the concept of reviewer karma to be counter to both software
quality and openness. In this particular case it would seem that the
simplest solution to this problem
Long-story short, sounds like we do have the same concerns here in Climate.
I'll be present at the Summit, any chance to do an unconference meeting
in between all parties ?
Thanks,
-Sylvain
Le 11/10/2013 08:25, Mike Spreitzer a écrit :
Regarding Alex's question of which component does
Is that actually doing something or parsing the sub commands?
I think after args is initialized it is probably the args.func calls that
actually does something. For example the following line in the main:
args.func(self.cs, args)
What do you think is the .func method?
Regards
Al
On Oct 11,
Thanks James!!
On 11/10/13 23:47, James Page wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Folks
I've just finishing promoting all of the Havana RC1 packages and
associated dependencies to the Ubuntu Cloud Archive for Ubuntu 12.04 LTS.
For details of how to use the Ubuntu Cloud
On Oct 11, 2013, at 14:15 , Sean Dague s...@dague.net
wrote:
On 10/10/2013 08:43 PM, Tim Smith wrote:
snip
Again, I don't have any vested interest in this discussion, except that
I believe the concept of reviewer karma to be counter to both software
quality and openness. In this particular
On Friday, October 11, 2013, Mayank Mittal wrote:
Hi Teams,
Please suggest and guide for starting to contribute in development. About
me - I have been working on L2/L3 protocol, SNMP, NMS development and ready
to contribute as a full timer to openstack.
PS : My interest lies in LB and
We met at our regular meeting this week and will meet again next week at
the same time, Tuesday 1300 UTC in #openstack-meeting. [1]
1. In review and merged this past week:
We got the install guide reorg patch this week and have been working on it.
Architectures and assignments are here:
On 10/10/2013 11:15 PM, Joshua Hesketh wrote:
Hi there,
I've been reviewing this change which is currently proposed for master
and I think it needs to be considered for the next Havana RC.
Change I3e080c30: Fix resource length in project_user_quotas table
On 10/11/2013 05:04 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Joshua Hesketh wrote:
I've been reviewing this change which is currently proposed for master
and I think it needs to be considered for the next Havana RC.
Change I3e080c30: Fix resource length in project_user_quotas table
On 10/11/2013 09:02 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
OpenStack is organized differently: there are lots of separate projects
(Nova, Neutrom, Glance, etc) instead of a single one (which is a good thing),
but I believe that a similar approach can be applied. Specific contributors
can be
Hello,
Thanks Angus, Clint, I've got your design.
It seems that Murano can built on top of that. With service metadata
knowledge Murano can generate HOT templates with set of interdependent
configs.
Here is what will be needed:
1. Ability to implement support for custom software configuration
On Oct 11, 2013, at 9:14 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, October 11, 2013, Mayank Mittal wrote:
Hi Teams,
Please suggest and guide for starting to contribute in development. About me
- I have been working on L2/L3 protocol, SNMP, NMS development and ready to
Have you looked at the volume_clear and volume_clear_size options in
cinder.conf?
https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/2013.2.rc1/etc/cinder/cinder.conf.sample#L1073
The default is to zero out the volume. You could try 'none' to see if
that helps with performance.
Thanks,
MATT
On Oct 11, 2013, at 17:17 , Russell Bryant
rbry...@redhat.commailto:rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 09:02 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
OpenStack is organized differently: there are lots of separate projects (Nova,
Neutrom, Glance, etc) instead of a single one (which is a good
On 10/11/2013 03:20 AM, cosmos cosmos wrote:
Hello.
My name is Rucia for Samsung SDS.
Now I am in trouble in cinder volume deleting.
I am developing for supporting big data storage in lvm
But it takes too much time for deleting of cinder lvm volume because of dd.
Cinder volume is 200GB for
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Have you looked at the volume_clear and volume_clear_size options in
cinder.conf?
*
https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/2013.2.rc1/etc/cinder/cinder.conf.sample#L1073
On 10/11/2013 10:41 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 17:17 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 09:02 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
OpenStack is organized differently: there are lots of separate
projects (Nova, Neutrom,
Hi all,
I'm seeing a lot of memcache connections from my api hosts to memcached and it
looks like the number is way too high for what I expect.
The way I understand the code at the moment, there's going to be a specified
number of workers (20 in my case) and each will have access to a
The notes from the meeting and a link to the full logs can be found at
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2013/oslo.2013-10-11-14.00.html
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
The Oslo team will be meeting this week to discuss delayed message
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 11 October 2013 15:18
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Hyper-V] Havana status
As a practical example for Nova: in our case that would simply include the
following
On Oct 11, 2013, at 18:02 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 10:41 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 17:17 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 09:02 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
OpenStack is
We could either have a single repo:
openstack/nova-extra-drivers
This would be my preference for sure, just from the standpoint of
additional release complexity otherwise. I know it might complicate how
the core team works, but presumably we could get away with just having
driver
I think that all drivers that are officially supported must be
treated in the same way.
Well, we already have multiple classes of support due to the various
states of testing that the drivers have.
If we are going to split out drivers into a separate but still
official repository then we
On Oct 11, 2013 6:04 PM, Alex la6...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that actually doing something or parsing the sub commands?
I think after args is initialized it is probably the args.func calls that
actually does something. For example the following line in the main:
args.func(self.cs, args)
What
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Bob Ball bob.b...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 11 October 2013 15:18
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Hyper-V] Havana status
As a practical
On Oct 11, 2013, at 18:36 , Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com
wrote:
I think that all drivers that are officially supported must be
treated in the same way.
Well, we already have multiple classes of support due to the various
states of testing that the drivers have.
If we are going to
On 10/11/2013 12:04 PM, John Griffith wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Bob Ball bob.b...@citrix.com
mailto:bob.b...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: 11 October 2013
My only request here is that we can make sure that new driver
features can land for other drivers without necessarilky having them
implemented for libvirt/KVM first.
We've got lots of things supported by the XenAPI drivers that aren't
supported by libvirt, so I don't think this is a problem
Excerpts from Stan Lagun's message of 2013-10-11 07:22:37 -0700:
Hello,
Thanks Angus, Clint, I've got your design.
It seems that Murano can built on top of that. With service metadata
knowledge Murano can generate HOT templates with set of interdependent
configs.
Here is what will be
On 10/9/2013 12:55 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
Your example sounds a lot like what taskflow is build for doing.
https://github.com/stackforge/taskflow/blob/master/taskflow/examples/calculate_in_parallel.py
is
a decent example.
In that one, tasks are created and input/output dependencies are
On 10/11/2013 09:02 AM, John Griffith wrote:
As Matt pointed out there's an option to turn off secure-delete
altogether. The reason for the volume_clear setting (aka secure delete)
is that since we're allocating volumes via LVM from a shared VG there is
the possibility that a user had a volume
We've just committed a first set of patches to gerrit that address this
blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/cluster-federation
Quoting from that page: The goal of this work is to enable account contents to
be dispersed across multiple clusters, motivated by (a) accounts
Hi,
I just started a draft with suggestions to enhance the UX of the Launch
Instance form:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hUdmyxpVxbYwgGtPbzDsBUXsv0_rtKbfgCHYxOgFjlo
Try the live prototype:
http://cedricss.github.io/openstack-dashboard-ux-blueprints/launch-instance
Best,
Cédric
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 14:15 , Sean Dague s...@dague.net
wrote:
On 10/10/2013 08:43 PM, Tim Smith wrote:
snip
Again, I don't have any vested interest in this discussion, except that
I believe the
I'd like to see the powervm driver fall into that first category. We
don't nearly have the rapid development that the hyper-v driver does, but
we do have some out of tree stuff anyway simply because it hasn't landed
upstream yet (DB2, config drive support for the powervm driver, etc), and
On 2013-10-11 10:50:33 -0600 (-0600), Chris Friesen wrote:
Sounds like we could use some kind of layer that will zero out
blocks on read if they haven't been written by that user.
[...]
You've mostly just described thin provisioning... reads to
previously unused blocks are returned
+1
A few comments:
1. Bear in mind that sometimes a user may not have access to any Ephemeral
flavors, so the tabbing should ideally be adaptive. An alternative would
not to bother with the tabs and just show a flavor list. In our deployment
we have no flavors with ephemeral disk space larger
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2013-10-11 10:50:33 -0600 (-0600), Chris Friesen wrote:
Sounds like we could use some kind of layer that will zero out
blocks on read if they haven't been written by that user.
[...]
You've mostly just described
On Oct 11, 2013, at 19:04 , John Griffith
john.griff...@solidfire.commailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Bob Ball
bob.b...@citrix.commailto:bob.b...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant
Hi,
I had some questions about the trusted messaging project.
1. During your design did you consider a kerberos style ticketing service
for KDS? If yes what were the reasons against it?
2. The Keystone documentation does say that it can support kerberos style
authentication. Are there
Excellent points guys!
Salvatore, It was you presenting that blueprint in San Diego? Hopefully we
can get more people involved. I will not call it NATaaS
Harshad,
I also like to simplify as much as possible NAT configuration, in and out
networks and that is :-)
Rudra,
IPAM extensions
On 10/11/2013 01:18 PM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 19:04 , John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com
mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Bob Ball bob.b...@citrix.com
mailto:bob.b...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original
On Oct 11, 2013, at 19:29 , Russell Bryant
rbry...@redhat.commailto:rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 12:04 PM, John Griffith wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Bob Ball
bob.b...@citrix.commailto:bob.b...@citrix.com
mailto:bob.b...@citrix.com wrote:
-Original
Excellent discussion on various issues around orchestration and
coordination -- thanks to you all, in particular to Clint, Angus, Stan,
Thomas, Joshua, Zane, Steve ...
After reading the discussions, I am finding the following themes emerging
(please feel free to correct/add):
1. Most of the
On 10/11/2013 02:03 PM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
Talking about new community involvements, newcomers are getting very
frustrated to have to wait for weeks to get a meaningful review and I
cannot blame them if they don't want to get involved anymore after the
first patch!
This makes appear
Recently in the TripleO meeting we identified situations where we need
to make it very clear that it is ok to pick up somebody else's patch
and finish it. We are broadly distributed, time-zone-wise, and I know
other teams working on OpenStack projects have the same situation. So
when one of us
Hi Kyle,
This observation is with OVS Plugin.
Regards,
Balaji.P
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Mestery (kmestery) [mailto:kmest...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 4:14 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] OVS Agent and VxLan UDP
On 10/11/2013 02:03 PM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 19:29 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 12:04 PM, John Griffith wrote:
[... snip ...]
Talking about new community involvements, newcomers are getting very
On 10/11/2013 02:34 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Recently in the TripleO meeting we identified situations where we need
to make it very clear that it is ok to pick up somebody else's patch
and finish it. We are broadly distributed, time-zone-wise, and I know
other teams working on OpenStack projects
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 10/11/2013 12:40:19 PM:
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 10/11/2013 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration
proposal for workflows
3. Ability to return
Running git review -d $gerrit_id will download the patch and create a
local branch for you.
For example, if I wanted to work on Sandy's patch
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/51249 I would git review -d 51249. I can
then amend the changeset, rebase, or whatever. Running git review will
push it up
On 10/11/2013 11:55 AM, Lakshminaraya Renganarayana wrote:
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 10/11/2013 12:40:19 PM:
From: Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com
To: openstack-dev openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 10/11/2013 12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:43 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/11/2013 02:03 PM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 19:29 , Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 10/11/2013 12:04 PM, John Griffith wrote:
Umm... just to clarify the section below is NOT
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
Recently in the TripleO meeting we identified situations where we need
to make it very clear that it is ok to pick up somebody else's patch
and finish it. We are broadly distributed, time-zone-wise, and I know
other teams
Not to derail the current direction this thread is heading but my 2 cents
on the topic of moving drivers out of tree:
I share a lot of the same concerns that John Griffith pointed out. As a one
of the maintainers of the PowerVM driver in nova,
I view the official-ness of having the driver in tree
Hi folks,
I have a bunch of questions for you on VPNaaS in specific, and services in
general...
Nachi,
1) You hd a bug fix to do service provider framework support for VPN (41827).
It was held for Icehouse. Is that pretty much a working patch?
2) When are you planning on reopening the
Just wanted to chime in that Trove also follows this approach and it's
worked pretty well for us.
+1 on Doug's suggestion to leave a comment on the patch so that two
reviewers don't end up doing the same work fixing it.
Cheers,
-Nikhil
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Dolph Mathews
Good evening everyone,
Due to various issues detected in RC1 testing, we just created a new
Havana release candidate for OpenStack Block Storage (Cinder).
You can find the RC2 tarball and the list of fixed bugs at:
https://launchpad.net/cinder/havana/havana-rc2
This is hopefully the last
I'll be at the summit too. Available Nov 4 if we want to do some prep
then. It will be my first summit, I am not sure how overbooked my summit
time will be.
Regards,
Mike
From: Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@bull.net
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
On 11.10.2013, at 22:58, Rochelle.Grober
rochelle.gro...@huawei.commailto:rochelle.gro...@huawei.com wrote:
Pardon me for cutting out most of the discussion. I’d like to summarize a bit
here and make a proposal.
Issues:
· Driver and Plugin writers for Nova (and other Core
Added several more questions inline…
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL p...@cisco.com
IRC pcm_ (irc.freenode.net)
TW @pmichali
On Oct 11, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Paul Michali p...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I have a bunch of questions for you on VPNaaS in specific, and services in
general...
Hi Paul
2013/10/11 Paul Michali p...@cisco.com:
Hi folks,
I have a bunch of questions for you on VPNaaS in specific, and services in
general...
Nachi,
1) You hd a bug fix to do service provider framework support for VPN
(41827). It was held for Icehouse. Is that pretty much a working
2013/10/11 Paul Michali p...@cisco.com:
Added several more questions inline…
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL p...@cisco.com
IRC pcm_ (irc.freenode.net)
TW @pmichali
On Oct 11, 2013, at 3:28 PM, Paul Michali p...@cisco.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I have a bunch of questions for you on VPNaaS in
Hi Artem
Thank you for your pointing out this.
I'm still thinking about the design. Once I got the draft, I'll share
it in the bp and here..
Best
Nachi
2013/10/10 Artem Dmytrenko nexton...@yahoo.com:
Hi Rudra, Nachi.
Glad to see this discussion on the mailing list! The ExtraRoute routes are
Hi
I am new to baremetal provisioning with openstack.
I have followed this link for the setup:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Baremetal
I have followed instructions from the above link and generated the vmlinuz
and ramdisk images. I loaded these vmlinuz and ramdisk into the baremetal
node
Hi
I am past the quota issue, i increased the quota for the project.
Where should i get the kernel and ramdisk for tinycore bootstrap?
And how do i download the baremetal agent to the baremetal node?
Now when i do nova boot i see the following issue:
All nova services are up and working.
On 10/11/2013 05:09 PM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
My suggestion is to bring this discussion to HK, possibly with a few beers
in front and sort it out :-)
Sounds like a good plan to me!
Thanks,
--
Russell Bryant
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
When you do, have a beer for me. I'll be looking for what you guys come up
with.
And I don't think a separate project would be a second class project. The
driver guys could be so successful that all the drivers end up there and the
interfaces between Nova and the drivers get *real* clean and
Hi,
I'm using grizzly with sqlalchemy 0.7.9.
I'm seeing some funny behaviour related to the automatic update of
updated_at column for the Service class in the sqlalchemy model.
I added a new column to the Service class, and I want to be able to
update that column without triggering the
Hi
I am trying to issue the boot command to provision baremetal server. But i
see the following error:
Also, where can i get the bootstrap kernel and ramdisk images to boot into
the baremetal? And how to get the baremetal agent installed in the
baremetal node?
command:
=
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Ravikanth Samprathi rsamp...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks Joe.
Also may i please request the info about which kernel and ramdisk image to
load and how to get baremetal agent loaded into the baremetal server?
The nova-api.log is here:
==
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Vladik Romanovsky
vladik.romanov...@enovance.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have been recently working on a migration bug in nova (Bug #1233184).
I noticed that compute service remains available, even if a connection to
libvirt is broken.
I thought that it
Great!
Looking forward to seeing more of this discussion. I've mentioned that I
submitted a blueprint request extending ExtraRoute extension to include more
routing attributes. It's located here:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/extended-route-params/ and it
contains editable
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote:
2. Ability to provide arbitrary input values for the config
We already have that, there's a free-form json document called metadata
attached to every resource. Or maybe I missed what you mean here. The
new capability that
90 matches
Mail list logo
