Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][mistral] EventScheduler vs Mistral scheduling

2013-11-14 Thread Renat Akhmerov
On 13 нояб. 2013 г., at 6:39, Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com wrote: Your work mates;) https://github.com/rackerlabs/qonos how about merge qonos into mistral, or at lest put it into stack forge? Just got to looking at qonos. It actually looks similar in some ways to Mistral but with some

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Command Line Interface for Solum

2013-11-14 Thread Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda
On Nov 14, 2013 1:10 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Noorul, On Nov 13, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote: Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com writes: On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Noorul Islam K M noo...@noorul.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [heat] Custom Flavor creation through Heat

2013-11-14 Thread Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo)
-Original Message- From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:24 PM To: openstack-dev Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [heat] Custom Flavor creation through Heat Excerpts from Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo)'s message of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [heat] Custom Flavor creation through Heat

2013-11-14 Thread Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo)
From: Steve Baker [mailto:sba...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 9:25 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [heat] Custom Flavor creation through Heat On 11/13/2013 07:50 AM, Steven Dake wrote: On 11/12/2013 10:25

Re: [openstack-dev] Glance Tasks

2013-11-14 Thread Mark Washenberger
Responses to both Jay and George inline. On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry for top-posting, but in summary, I entirely agree with George here. His logic is virtually identical to the concerns I raised with the initial proposal for Glance Tasks here:

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova SSL Apache2 Question

2013-11-14 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 13 November 2013 23:39, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis) mark.m.mil...@hp.com wrote: I finally found a set of web pages that has a working set of configuration files for the major OpenStack services

Re: [openstack-dev] Custom Flavor creation through Heat

2013-11-14 Thread Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo)
not the video I was looking for, but he kind of makes the point about planning... http://youtu.be/2E0C9zLSINE?t=42m55s # Shawn Hartsock Thanks Shawn for your inputs. As I have mentioned earlier, the usecase is mostly for telecom cloud applications running in our private cloud. The hardware

Re: [openstack-dev] [RFC] Straw man to start the incubation / graduation requirements discussion

2013-11-14 Thread Thierry Carrez
Kurt Griffiths wrote: Also does it place a requirement that all projects wanting to request incubation to be placed in stackforge ? That sounds like a harsh requirement if we were to reject them. I think that anything that encourages projects to get used to the OpenStack development process

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-14 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 13/11/13 17:20 -0800, Stefano Maffulli wrote: On 11/13/2013 04:34 PM, Colin McNamara wrote: Not to be contrarian, but 92% of the commits in Havana came from non-individual contributions. The majority of those came from big name companies (IBM, RedHat, etc). ow, that's harsh. Despite what

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-14 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 13/11/13 17:22 -0700, John Griffith wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/11/2013 12:44 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 03:20:20PM +0100, Nicolas Barcet wrote: Dear TC members, Our companies are actively encouraging our

Re: [openstack-dev] Proposal to recognize indirect contributions to our code base

2013-11-14 Thread Thierry Carrez
Stefano Maffulli wrote: On 11/13/2013 04:34 PM, Colin McNamara wrote: Not to be contrarian, but 92% of the commits in Havana came from non-individual contributions. The majority of those came from big name companies (IBM, RedHat, etc). ow, that's harsh. Despite what US Supreme Court Judges

Re: [openstack-dev] [RFC] Straw man to start the incubation / graduation requirements discussion

2013-11-14 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 14/11/13 10:13 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Kurt Griffiths wrote: Also does it place a requirement that all projects wanting to request incubation to be placed in stackforge ? That sounds like a harsh requirement if we were to reject them. I think that anything that encourages projects to

Re: [openstack-dev] Congress: an open policy framework

2013-11-14 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 13/11/13 10:40 -0800, Tim Hinrichs wrote: We're just getting started with Congress and understanding how it will integrate with the OS ecosystem, but here's our current thinking about how Congress relates to Oslo's policy engine and to Keystone. Comments and suggestions are welcome.

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][mistral] EventScheduler vs Mistral scheduling

2013-11-14 Thread Zane Bitter
On 14/11/13 11:29, Renat Akhmerov wrote: As for EventScheduler proposal, I think it actually fits Mistral model very well. What described in EvenScheduler is basically the ability to configure webhooks to be called periodically or at a certain time. First of all, from the very beginning the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] LBaaS Subteam meeting

2013-11-14 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Also, just to add some pedantry (which you know I am very fond of), it would be the case to share on openstack-dev minutes and logs from eavesdrop after each subteam meeting. I know they're anyway at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ - but sending an email will be useful to notify the rest

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] LBaaS Subteam meeting

2013-11-14 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Sure, no problem. On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote: Also, just to add some pedantry (which you know I am very fond of), it would be the case to share on openstack-dev minutes and logs from eavesdrop after each subteam meeting. I know they're anyway

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - Vendor specific erros

2013-11-14 Thread Salvatore Orlando
In general, an error state make sense. I think you might want to send more details about how this state plugs into the load balancer state machine, but I reckon it is a generally non-recoverable state which could be reached by any other state; in that case it would be a generic enough case which

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Blueprint -- Floating IP Auto Association

2013-11-14 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Hi Steven, I see three Steven Weston on Launchpad. If you give me your LP ID, I will assign the blueprint to you. This is a nova parity item and i'd like to raise the priority to High. It would be also good to hear from you about the implementation approach. In the past we debated two

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [ipv6] IPv6 meeting - Thursdays 21:00UTC - #openstack-meeting-alt

2013-11-14 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Although IRC requires typing, I find it more inclusive than Webex. It's easy to have 100s of people in a IRC room, not so easy on a conf call. Also, people like me whose 1st language is not English might find easier to write read rather than listen speak. Finally, the capability of generating

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][mistral] EventScheduler vs Mistral scheduling

2013-11-14 Thread Renat Akhmerov
On 14 Nov 2013, at 18:03, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: What might be a downside is that sharing a back-end may not be technically convenient - one thing we have been reminded of in Heat is that a service with timed tasks has to be scaled out in a completely different way to a

[openstack-dev] [Cinder][Glance] OSLO update

2013-11-14 Thread Elena Ezhova
Hello all, I have made several patches that update modules in cinder/openstack/common from oslo which have not been reviewed for more than a month already. My colleague has the same problem with her patches in Glance. Probably it's not a top priority issue, but if oslo is not updated

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [heat] Custom Flavor creation through Heat

2013-11-14 Thread Steven Hardy
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:22:57AM +, Kodam, Vijayakumar (EXT-Tata Consultancy Ser - FI/Espoo) wrote: snip Thanks Steve Baker for the information. I am also waiting to hear from Steve Hardy, if keystone trust system will fix the nova flavors admin privileges issue. So, basically, no.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the resource tracker session

2013-11-14 Thread John Garbutt
On 13 November 2013 23:22, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com wrote: On 11/13/13 at 11:12pm, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: Hi, Dan Smith and all, I noticed followed statement in 'Icehouse tasks' in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IcehouseNovaExtensibleSchedulerMetrics

Re: [openstack-dev] Congress: an open policy framework

2013-11-14 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: We're just getting started with Congress and understanding how it will integrate with the OS ecosystem, but here's our current thinking about how Congress relates to Oslo's policy engine and to Keystone. Comments and

[openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi everyone, I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of those are just off-topic (and I've been regularly fighting against them) but most of them are just

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] That will not solve all issues. We should also collectively make sure that *usage questions are re-routed* to the openstack general mailing-list, where they belong. Too many people still answer off-topic questions here on openstack-dev, which encourages people to

[openstack-dev] AWS compatibility discussions at today's Nova Meeting

2013-11-14 Thread Rohit.Karajgi
Hi Folks, As a first follow up after last week's design summit session, let's discuss at today's Nova meeting the steps to be taken for putting in continuous efforts for AWS compatibility in Openstack. Nova Meeting: 21:00 UTC Summit Etherpad:

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Nov 14 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote: Other suggestion: we could stop posting meeting reminders to -dev (I know, I'm guilty of it) and only post something if the meeting time changes, or if the weekly meeting is canceled for whatever reason. Good suggestion. -- Julien Danjou -- Free

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Nov 14 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote: Thoughts ? I agree on the need to split, the traffic is getting huge. As I'd have to subscribe to both openstack-dev and stackforge-dev, that would not help me personally, but I think it can be an easy and first step. -- Julien Danjou -- Free

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Dina Belova
Yeah, that's big problem... Especially when you are trying to keep track on lots of topics... I suppose this solution will do letters' prioritisation at least easier for developers and everybody who is subscribed on openstack-dev. Nice idea. On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Thierry Carrez

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:19:24PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] That will not solve all issues. We should also collectively make sure that *usage questions are re-routed* to the openstack general mailing-list, where they belong. Too many people still answer

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Nov 14 2013, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Is there somewhere on the website which keeps a record of all regular scheduled meetings people can discover / refer to easily ? It's all on the wiki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings -- Julien Danjou // Free Software hacker /

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Command Line Interface for Solum

2013-11-14 Thread Dean Troyer
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.comwrote: Are you referring to openstack solum … in your suggestion of what not to do? If there is no project name in there, how would it work? Would we have a flat global namespace for all verbs? Yes. See

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Stephen Gran
On 14/11/13 13:23, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Is there somewhere on the website which keeps a record of all regular scheduled meetings people can discover / refer to easily ? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings Cheers, -- Stephen Gran Senior Systems Integrator - theguardian.com Please

Re: [openstack-dev] Glance Tasks

2013-11-14 Thread George Reese
One critical reasons why tasks rather than resource status may be required is because: a) The system state may not be sufficient at time of POST/PUT to generate a “minimum viable resource” and we don’t want to risk timeouts waiting for the “minimum viable resource b) There may be more stuff

Re: [openstack-dev] [reviews] putting numbers on -core team load

2013-11-14 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote: Total reviews: 10705 (118.9/day) Total reviewers: 406 Total reviews by core team: 5289 (58.8/day) Core team size: 17 New patch sets in the last 90 days: 7515 (83.5/day) This is the really interesting bit.

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread mark
This would also have the added benefit of reducing the times people conflate related open source projects from stackforge with OpenStack itself. Having related oss discussions on a list called OpenStack-Dev may certainly have given the wrong impression to the casual observer. On Nov 14, 2013

Re: [openstack-dev] [reviews] putting numbers on -core team load

2013-11-14 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.comwrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: So if everyone uploaded perfect changesets we'd only need 40 core reviews per day :-) And I should add in terms of changesets that are

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Thierry Carrez
Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Nov 14 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote: Thoughts ? I agree on the need to split, the traffic is getting huge. As I'd have to subscribe to both openstack-dev and stackforge-dev, that would not help me personally, but I think it can be an easy and first step.

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Sean Dague
On 11/14/2013 08:12 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of those are just off-topic (and I've been regularly

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 14/11/13 14:12 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of those are just off-topic (and I've been regularly

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Core pinning

2013-11-14 Thread Tuomas Paappanen
On 13.11.2013 20:20, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: -Original Message- From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 9:57 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Core pinning On 11/13/2013 11:40 AM, Jiang,

Re: [openstack-dev] Congress: an open policy framework

2013-11-14 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 14/11/13 04:40 -0800, Morgan Fainberg wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Tim Hinrichs thinri...@vmware.com wrote: We're just getting started with Congress and understanding how it will integrate with the OS ecosystem, but here's our current thinking about how Congress relates to

Re: [openstack-dev] [reviews] putting numbers on -core team load

2013-11-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:29:36PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: At the summit there were lots of discussions about reviews, and I made the mistake of sending a mail to Russell proposing a few new stats we could gather. I say mistake, because he did so and then some... we new have extra info

[openstack-dev] [Mistral] Etherpad for Mistral high level design and 3rd party technologies

2013-11-14 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Hi, We’ve created an etherpad to start thinking about Mistral main components and listing out possible 3rd party technologies to use for their implementation. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MistralDesignAndDependencies Feel free to share your ideas. Thanks. Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis

[openstack-dev] [Solum] Version scheme

2013-11-14 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Hello all, We need to decide on version scheme that we are going to use. Monty Taylor said the following in one of the comments for review [1]: Setting a version here enrolls solum in managing its version in a pre-release versioning manner, such that non-tagged versions will indicated that

Re: [openstack-dev] [reviews] putting numbers on -core team load

2013-11-14 Thread Sean Dague
On 11/14/2013 09:03 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 08:29:36PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: At the summit there were lots of discussions about reviews, and I made the mistake of sending a mail to Russell proposing a few new stats we could gather. I say mistake, because

Re: [openstack-dev] RFC: reverse the default Gerrit sort order

2013-11-14 Thread Steven Hardy
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:36:49PM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: I've been thinking about review queues recently (since here at the summit everyone is talking about reviews! :)). One thing that struck me today was that Gerrit makes it easier to review the newest changes first, rather than the

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTL] Proposed Icehouse release schedule

2013-11-14 Thread Anne Gentle
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2013-11-13 14:15:31 +0100 (+0100), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] * Week of April 21 [...] I've already got travel plans this week, so works for me (and release week too, though it was scheduled well over a year

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][mistral] EventScheduler vs Mistral scheduling

2013-11-14 Thread Zane Bitter
On 14/11/13 12:26, Renat Akhmerov wrote: On 14 Nov 2013, at 18:03, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote: What might be a downside is that sharing a back-end may not be technically convenient - one thing we have been reminded of in Heat is that a service with timed

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Port mirroring

2013-11-14 Thread Rossella Sblendido
Hello devs, I'd like to start working at this blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/port-mirroring I didn't receive much feedback so please have a look at it. It was not approved yet. What's the usual workflow? Shall I wait for approval before I start implementing it? Sorry

Re: [openstack-dev] Glance Tasks

2013-11-14 Thread Jay Pipes
On 11/14/2013 08:32 AM, George Reese wrote: One critical reasons why tasks rather than resource status may be required is because: a) The system state may not be sufficient at time of POST/PUT to generate a “minimum viable resource” and we don’t want to risk timeouts waiting for the “minimum

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Jay Pipes
++ On 11/14/2013 08:37 AM, m...@openstack.org wrote: This would also have the added benefit of reducing the times people conflate related open source projects from stackforge with OpenStack itself. Having related oss discussions on a list called OpenStack-Dev may certainly have given the

Re: [openstack-dev] [style] () vs \ continuations

2013-11-14 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote: Hi so - in http://docs.openstack.org/developer/hacking/ it has as bullet point 4: Long lines should be wrapped in parentheses in preference to using a backslash for line continuation. I'm seeing in some reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Configure overcommit policy

2013-11-14 Thread John Garbutt
On 13 November 2013 14:51, Khanh-Toan Tran khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.com wrote: Well, I don't know what John means by modify the over-commit calculation in the scheduler, so I cannot comment. I was talking about this code:

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Continue discussing multi-region orchestration

2013-11-14 Thread Bartosz Górski
Hi all, At summit in Hong Kong we had a design session where we discussed adding multi-region orchestration support to Heat. During the session we had really heated discussion and spent most of the time on explaining the problem. I think it was really good starting point and right now more

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Anne Gentle
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote: Hi everyone, I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of those are just

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
+1, agreed. Personally, I’ll subscribe to both lists but I think it really could help to prioritize emails. Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Savanna Technical Lead Mirantis Inc. On Nov 14, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hi everyone, I think that we have

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] design summit outcomes

2013-11-14 Thread Steven Hardy
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:04:04AM -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote: I guarantee there's a few things I'm forgetting, but this is my collection of things we discussed at the summit and determined to be good things to pursue during the icehouse timeframe. The contents represent a high level mix of

Re: [openstack-dev] Using AD for keystone authentication only

2013-11-14 Thread Dolph Mathews
You can assign roles to users in keystoneclient ($ keystone help user-role-add) -- the assignment would be persisted in SQL. openstackclient supports assignments to groups as well if you switch to --identity-api-version=3 On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Avi L aviost...@gmail.com wrote: Oh ok

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Configure overcommit policy

2013-11-14 Thread Alex Glikson
In fact, there is a blueprint which would enable supporting this scenario without partitioning -- https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cpu-entitlement The idea is to annotate flavors with CPU allocation guarantees, and enable differentiation between instances, potentially running on the

Re: [openstack-dev] Alembic or SA Migrate (again)

2013-11-14 Thread Jay Pipes
On 11/13/2013 05:31 AM, Roman Podoliaka wrote: 2) run tests on MySQL/PostgreSQL instead (we have a proof-of-concept implementation here [2]) The latter approach has a few problems though: 1) even if tests are run in parallel and each test case is run within a single transaction with ROLLBACK in

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tracking development of scenario tests

2013-11-14 Thread Zhi Kun Liu
+1, This is a great idea. We could consider it as a general process for all tests. 2013/11/14 Koderer, Marc m.kode...@telekom.de Hi all, I think we have quite the same issue with the neutron testing. I already put it on the agenda for the QA meeting for today. Let's make it to a general

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Group-based Policy Sub-team Meetings

2013-11-14 Thread Mohammad Banikazemi
Kyle, Thank you for organizing this. I think the original email you sent out did not solicit any comments (except for possibly proposing a different time for the weekly meetings). So that is probably why you have not heard from anybody (including me). So we are ready to have the meeting but if

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: Other suggestion: we could stop posting meeting reminders to -dev (I know, I'm guilty of it) and only post something if the meeting time changes, or if the weekly meeting is canceled for whatever reason. Good

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Romain Hardouin
Good idea. -romain ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Version scheme

2013-11-14 Thread Murali Allada
I'm not a big fan of using date information in the version number. Is there an advantage to doing that? Using a model like 0.0.1 makes it easier to communicate. A better approach might be to use Major.Minor.Revision.Build. If we want to use dates, Year.Month.Day.Build or

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][mistral] EventScheduler vs Mistral scheduling

2013-11-14 Thread Christopher Armstrong
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.comwrote: As for EventScheduler proposal, I think it actually fits Mistral model very well. What described in EvenScheduler is basically the ability to configure webhooks to be called periodically or at a certain time. First of

[openstack-dev] [keystone] External authentication

2013-11-14 Thread Álvaro López García
Hi all, During the review of [1] I had a look at the tests that are related with external authentication (i.e. the usage of REMOTE_USER) in Keystone and I realised that there is a bunch of them that are setting external as one of the authentication methods. However, in keystone.auth.controllers

Re: [openstack-dev] nova image list | Error 401

2013-11-14 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2013-11-14 04:41, Santosh Kumar wrote: Hi Experts, I am following Havana guide for installation of three node set up. After installing all services of NOVA ( nova-api , nova-cert, nova-scheduler, nova-consoleauth, nova-novncproxy ), when I tires to verify All the things by # nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Version scheme

2013-11-14 Thread Monty Taylor
On 11/14/2013 10:36 AM, Murali Allada wrote: I'm not a big fan of using date information in the version number. Is there an advantage to doing that? Using a model like 0.0.1 makes it easier to communicate. A better approach might be to use *Major.Minor.Revision.Build*. If we want to use

[openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

2013-11-14 Thread Christopher Armstrong
http://docs.heatautoscale.apiary.io/ I've thrown together a rough sketch of the proposed API for autoscaling. It's written in API-Blueprint format (which is a simple subset of Markdown) and provides schemas for inputs and outputs using JSON-Schema. The source document is currently at

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][keystone] APIs, roles, request scope and admin-ness

2013-11-14 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all, Looking to start a wider discussion, prompted by: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54651/ https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/management-api https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-management-api Summary

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Version scheme

2013-11-14 Thread Clayton Coleman
- Original Message - On 11/14/2013 10:36 AM, Murali Allada wrote: I'm not a big fan of using date information in the version number. Is there an advantage to doing that? Using a model like 0.0.1 makes it easier to communicate. A better approach might be to use

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Version scheme

2013-11-14 Thread Noorul Islam K M
Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com writes: On 11/14/2013 10:36 AM, Murali Allada wrote: I'm not a big fan of using date information in the version number. Is there an advantage to doing that? Using a model like 0.0.1 makes it easier to communicate. A better approach might be to use

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Configure overcommit policy

2013-11-14 Thread Khanh-Toan Tran
Step 1: use flavors so nova can tell between the two workloads, and configure them differently Step 2: find capacity for your workload given your current cloud usage At the moment, most of our solutions involve reserving bits of your cloud capacity for different workloads, generally using host

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Group-based Policy Sub-team Meetings

2013-11-14 Thread Kyle Mestery (kmestery)
On Nov 14, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Mohammad Banikazemi m...@us.ibm.com wrote: Kyle, Thank you for organizing this. I think the original email you sent out did not solicit any comments (except for possibly proposing a different time for the weekly meetings). So that is probably why you have

Re: [openstack-dev] Congress: an open policy framework

2013-11-14 Thread Tim Hinrichs
I completely agree that making Congress successful will rely crucially on addressing performance and scalability issues. Some thoughts... 1. We're definitely intending to cache data locally to avoid repeated API calls. In fact, a prototype cache is already in place. We haven't yet hooked up

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTL] Proposed Icehouse release schedule

2013-11-14 Thread Thierry Carrez
Anne Gentle wrote: Just a question, did you consider a week off post-summit? I want to ensure the tons of questions that come in about the schedule can be answered. I felt the weeks up to the summit were still quite busy, not just from a docs perspective, but from a PTL/scheduler/arranger

[openstack-dev] [Nova][vmware] VMwareAPI sub-team reviews update 2013-11-14

2013-11-14 Thread Shawn Hartsock
Greetings Stackers! I hope you had a great time at the Summit! I'm expecting the VMwareAPI sub-team's priorities to shift around a bit as we digest the outcomes from the sessions. So, with that in mind, I'll stick to just updating on what reviews are in flight and where they are as far as our

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

2013-11-14 Thread Randall Burt
On Nov 14, 2013, at 10:19 AM, Christopher Armstrong chris.armstr...@rackspace.commailto:chris.armstr...@rackspace.com wrote: http://docs.heatautoscale.apiary.io/ I've thrown together a rough sketch of the proposed API for autoscaling. It's written in API-Blueprint format (which is a simple

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Joe Gordon
On Nov 14, 2013 5:16 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Hi everyone, I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and November well on its way to pass 2000 again. Some of those are just off-topic

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread David Ripton
On 11/14/2013 08:21 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: On Thu, Nov 14 2013, Thierry Carrez wrote: Thoughts ? I agree on the need to split, the traffic is getting huge. As I'd have to subscribe to both openstack-dev and stackforge-dev, that would not help me personally, but I think it can be an easy

Re: [openstack-dev] [style] () vs \ continuations

2013-11-14 Thread Joe Gordon
On Nov 14, 2013 6:58 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: Hi so - in http://docs.openstack.org/developer/hacking/ it has as bullet point 4: Long lines should be wrapped in parentheses in preference

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Glance] OSLO update

2013-11-14 Thread Joe Gordon
This ML is not for review requests. Please read http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html best, Joe sent on the go On Nov 14, 2013 4:26 AM, Elena Ezhova eezh...@mirantis.com wrote: Hello all, I have made several patches that update modules in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

2013-11-14 Thread Randall Burt
Good stuff! Some questions/comments: If web hooks are associated with policies and policies are independent entities, how does a web hook specify the scaling group to act on? Does calling the web hook activate the policy on every associated scaling group? Regarding web hook execution and cool

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Version scheme

2013-11-14 Thread Murali Allada
Thanks for the clear explanation Monty. -Murali On Nov 14, 2013, at 10:08 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 11/14/2013 10:36 AM, Murali Allada wrote: I'm not a big fan of using date information in the version number. Is there an advantage to doing that? Using a model

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova SSL Apache2 Question

2013-11-14 Thread Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
Hello Jesse, Thank you for the information. Would you be so kind as to provide a URL to the updated rcbops chef cookbooks for Quantum? Regards, Mark From: Jesse Pretorius [mailto:jesse.pretor...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 12:43 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

2013-11-14 Thread Christopher Armstrong
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.comwrote: Good stuff! Some questions/comments: If web hooks are associated with policies and policies are independent entities, how does a web hook specify the scaling group to act on? Does calling the web hook activate

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the resource tracker session

2013-11-14 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
-Original Message- From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:22 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the resource tracker session On

Re: [openstack-dev] [style] () vs \ continuations

2013-11-14 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 14, 2013 6:58 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: Hi so - in http://docs.openstack.org/developer/hacking/ it has

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][keystone] APIs, roles, request scope and admin-ness

2013-11-14 Thread Steven Hardy
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:20:02AM -0600, Dolph Mathews wrote: On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all, Looking to start a wider discussion, prompted by: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/54651/

Re: [openstack-dev] Nova SSL Apache2 Question

2013-11-14 Thread Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
I believe I found it under nova-network. Thanks, Mark From: Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis) Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 9:31 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Nova SSL Apache2 Question Hello Jesse, Thank you

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Configure overcommit policy

2013-11-14 Thread Alex Glikson
Khanh-Toan Tran khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.com wrote on 14/11/2013 06:27:39 PM: It is interesting to see the development of the CPU entitlement blueprint that Alex mentioned. It was registered in Jan 2013. Any idea whether it is still going on? Yes. I hope we will be able to rebase and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

2013-11-14 Thread Randall Burt
On Nov 14, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Christopher Armstrong chris.armstr...@rackspace.commailto:chris.armstr...@rackspace.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Randall Burt randall.b...@rackspace.commailto:randall.b...@rackspace.com wrote: Good stuff! Some questions/comments: If web hooks are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

2013-11-14 Thread Zane Bitter
On 14/11/13 17:19, Christopher Armstrong wrote: http://docs.heatautoscale.apiary.io/ I've thrown together a rough sketch of the proposed API for autoscaling. It's written in API-Blueprint format (which is a simple subset of Markdown) and provides schemas for inputs and outputs using

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question to the resource tracker session

2013-11-14 Thread Andrew Laski
On 11/14/13 at 05:37pm, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: -Original Message- From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 3:22 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][object] One question

Re: [openstack-dev] [style] () vs \ continuations

2013-11-14 Thread Monty Taylor
On 11/13/2013 08:08 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 14 November 2013 13:59, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: This is an area where we actually have consensus in our docs (have had for a while), the reviewer was being consistent with them, and it feels like you are reopening that for personal

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] External authentication

2013-11-14 Thread Adam Young
On 11/14/2013 10:52 AM, Álvaro López García wrote: Hi all, During the review of [1] I had a look at the tests that are related with external authentication (i.e. the usage of REMOTE_USER) in Keystone and I realised that there is a bunch of them that are setting external as one of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [ipv6] IPv6 meeting - Thursdays 21:00UTC - #openstack-meeting-alt

2013-11-14 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2013-11-14 11:25:31 + (+), Salvatore Orlando wrote: [...] The fact that webex is not a free and open source service is another aspect to take into account I'll now duck before stones start being thrown as I'm not really the guy who can play FOSS advocate. Don't worry, I (and many

  1   2   >