Yair, The FWaaS tempest tests were not planned for H release. They are
planned for the current release (hence the blueprint) and some of us were
working towards them. This is also a standing discuss item this during the
the FWaaS sub team meetings.
Thanks,
~Sumit.
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:41
Due to New Year holidays we postpone all our meetings till January 7, our
next meeting is scheduled on January 14. Happy New Year!
--
Serg Melikyan, Senior Software Engineer at Mirantis, Inc.
http://mirantis.com | smelik...@mirantis.com
+7 (495) 640-4904, 0261
+7 (903) 156-0836
On 30 December 2013 22:51, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
IMO, switching to ext4 is a very bad idea, because ext4 doesn't support
online resize2fs, while ext3 does, so switching to ext4 is breaking
cloud-init!!!
It supports it just fine. (I just resized a 4TB volume to 10TB)...
online.
On 26/12/13 20:05 +0200, Sergey Skripnick wrote:
Hi all,
I'm surprised there is no common ssh library in oslo so I filed this
blueprint[0]. I would be happy to address any comments/suggestions.
[0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/common-ssh-client
If you think the BP is ready
Hey,
Please, tag emails' subjects.
Thanks,
FF
On 26/12/13 16:56 +0900, cosmos cosmos wrote:
Hello.
My name is Rucia for Samsung SDS.
I had in truouble in volume deleting.
I am developing for supporting big data storage such as hadoop in lvm.
it use as a full disk io for deleting of
Sent from Samsung Mobile
Original message
From: Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com
Date:
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Day, Phil philip@hp.com
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of
Hi,
I noticed that there is a bp
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/heat-template-managementwhich
want to improve the UI for HEAT template, does anyone working on this?
If not, does anyone who have some mock up dashboard for editing heat
template?
Thanks,
Jay
On 12/30/2013 12:39 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 12/29/2013 08:12 AM, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi Folks,
As highlighted in the thread “minimal review period for functional changes”
I’d like to propose that change is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63209/
is reverted because:
- It causes
There is a big difference between DocImpact (i.e. needing some improvements to
the doc) and putting the migration effort onto the users without automation to
help... as I have said previously, while this (and others like it) may be a
worthwhile change in isolation, making the upgrade process
So Tatiana pointed
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-June/thread.html#9993
to me, and from there i went on to read
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-August/thread.html#13074
and i can see valid points for H302, even if it annoy me sometime, if
it's
On 12/29/2013 07:45 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2013-12-29 15:09:24 -0500 (-0500), David Kranz wrote:
[...]
Looking at the docs I see the warning that you can't put this
in the search field so I tried putting it directly in the url like
the other parameters but it was ignored. Is there indeed
On 2013-12-30 23:15:06 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 12/30/2013 02:55 PM, li-zheming wrote:
[...]
I consider that it must be limited when set password, like this:
1. inlcude uppper and lower letters
2. include nums
3. include particular symbol，such as '_',''
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:15:06PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 12/30/2013 02:55 PM, li-zheming wrote:
hi all:
when create user, you can set user password. You can set password
as a simple word 'a'. the
password is too simple but not limit. if someone want to steal your
+1
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Michael Basnight mbasni...@gmail.comwrote:
Howdy,
Im proposing Auston McReynolds (amcrn) to trove-core.
Auston has been working with trove for a while now. He is a great
reviewer. He is incredibly thorough, and has caught more than one critical
error
+1
From: Michael Basnight mbasni...@gmail.commailto:mbasni...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Friday, December 27, 2013 4:48 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
On 2013-12-30 10:25:07 -0500 (-0500), David Kranz wrote:
I get that but it seems like this is a single field per gerrit user.
Is that not true? If true, it is not useful because the point is
that we want to be able to filter reviews that contain changes to
tests for a particular project. I
On 12/30/2013 06:02 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 30 December 2013 22:51, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
IMO, switching to ext4 is a very bad idea, because ext4 doesn't support
online resize2fs, while ext3 does, so switching to ext4 is breaking
cloud-init!!!
It supports it just
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Sumit Naiksatam
sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote:
Yair, The FWaaS tempest tests were not planned for H release. They are
planned for the current release (hence the blueprint) and some of us were
working towards them. This is also a standing discuss item this
+1
On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Michael Basnight
mbasni...@gmail.commailto:mbasni...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
Im proposing Auston McReynolds (amcrn) to trove-core.
Auston has been working with trove for a while now. He is a great reviewer. He
is incredibly thorough, and has caught more than
Any reason to not use taskflow (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TaskFlow) to
help u here??
I think it could be easily adapted to do what u want, and would save u from
having to recreate the same task execution logic that everyone seems to rebuild…
-Josh
From: Greg Hill
+1
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Greg Hill greg.h...@rackspace.com wrote:
+1
On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Michael Basnight mbasni...@gmail.com
wrote:
Howdy,
Im proposing Auston McReynolds (amcrn) to trove-core.
Auston has been working with trove for a while now. He is a great
I accidentally sent this reply to Josh directly.
Greg
On Dec 30, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Greg Hill
greg.h...@rackspace.commailto:greg.h...@rackspace.com wrote:
Taskflow seems like it would be a good fit for implementation or
re-implementation of some of the tasks we hope to automate, but the first
Hi, so it seems we were saying the same thing - new vms get a shared blank
(empty) file system, not blank disc. How big a problem it is that in many
cases this will be the already created ext3 disk and not ext4 depends I guess
on how important consistency is to you (to me its pretty
In case any one other than me didn't know this, the log files that are
indexed and searchable in logstash are not the same as the set of files
that you see in the logs directory in jenkins, but only those that have
an entry in
+1
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 30, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Craig Vyvial cp16...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Greg Hill greg.h...@rackspace.com wrote:
+1
On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Michael Basnight mbasni...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
Im proposing Auston
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:55 AM, li-zheming li-zhem...@163.com wrote:
hi all:
when create user, you can set user password. You can set password as
a simple word 'a'. the
password is too simple but not limit. if someone want to steal your
password, it is so easily(such as exhaustion).
I wonder if at least part of the problem is that whilst we have prioritisation
for bugs (via severity) and blueprints (via approval and target release) that
doesn't obviously carry through into gerrit. If it was easier to see what
we're high and low priory changes it might be easier to decide
ah, because the patched version won't work if you've already run the
unpatched version, would be nice if that had been captured in the bug
but did dig it out of
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2013-October/002481.html
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jonathan Proulx
Am 30.12.2013 08:31, schrieb Thomas Goirand:
Hi,
Currently, in the global-requirements.txt, we have:
Django=1.4,1.6
django-bootstrap-form
However, django-bootstrap-form fail in both Django 1.4 and Django 1.6.
What's the way forward? Would it be possible that someone makes a patch
for
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
I wonder if at least part of the problem is that whilst we have
prioritisation for bugs (via severity) and blueprints (via approval and
target release) that doesn't obviously carry through into gerrit. If it was
easier
On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 11:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I like the idea of having custom tags. I'm a bit concerned about the
implications this might have with cross-project collaborations. I
mean, people contributing to more projects will have to be aware of
the many possible differences in
On 12/27/2013 05:27 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote:
Hello guys!
I hope all of you are enjoying the holidays! But I'd like to raise a
Tempest question. Again. I hope this email will not be lost after
vacations :)
After the summit we decided to track all tests that are being created
for Ceilometer
Greg,
This might be useful: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Qonos-scheduling-service
There's a link to the code repository at the bottom of the document. It might
be kind of overkill for what you want, though.
cheers,
brian
From: Greg Hill
OK - if nobody has any objections, we'll start the new meetings up at
1500 UTC - that appears to be the time that everyone is OK with?
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Spoke too soon – I think 1500 UTC on Thursdays is already taken, we'd have to
change days.
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hi,
I would suggest to talk with Mistral team about scheduling. As I know right
now thay are writing a PoC code which will have scheduling functionality.
Mistral in contrary to Qonos does not require worker process. In Mistral
you can create a task with scheduler and API call back so that Mistral
On 30/12/13 13:44 -0600, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 11:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote:
I like the idea of having custom tags. I'm a bit concerned about the
implications this might have with cross-project collaborations. I
mean, people contributing to more projects will have
Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2013-12-30 11:05:17 -0800:
Hi, so it seems we were saying the same thing - new vms get a shared blank
(empty) file system, not blank disc. How big a problem it is that in many
cases this will be the already created ext3 disk and not ext4 depends I guess
Please.
When your third party testing structure votes on patches and your
testing structure is not stable, it will vote with a -1 on patches.
This results in three consequences:
1. The patch it votes on starts a countdown for abandonment, this is
frustrating for developers.
2. Reviewers who use
On 2013-12-30 22:46:24 -0500 (-0500), David Kranz wrote:
Looks like 2.8 came out recently and fixes this. It is mentioned
near the top of http://ostrovsky.org/gerrit-code-review-2-8-released/.
Awesome!
Is there a planned time to upgrade?
It's a priority, but the upgrade process is still
Sorry for being a little bit verbose :) …
Renat
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hello all,
Thank you for your suggestions about tracking bps. I'll create a
spreadsheet.
David,
1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55276/ is ready for review
2. We decided to move base.py to a separate change request:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64304/ to make it merged ASAP. But now I
42 matches
Mail list logo
