Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][FWaaS][Neutron]Firewall service disabled on gate

2013-12-30 Thread Sumit Naiksatam
Yair, The FWaaS tempest tests were not planned for H release. They are planned for the current release (hence the blueprint) and some of us were working towards them. This is also a standing discuss item this during the the FWaaS sub team meetings. Thanks, ~Sumit. On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 2:41

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Next meeting is scheduled on January 14

2013-12-30 Thread Serg Melikyan
Due to New Year holidays we postpone all our meetings till January 7, our next meeting is scheduled on January 14. Happy New Year! -- Serg Melikyan, Senior Software Engineer at Mirantis, Inc. http://mirantis.com | smelik...@mirantis.com +7 (495) 640-4904, 0261 +7 (903) 156-0836

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2013-12-30 Thread Robert Collins
On 30 December 2013 22:51, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: IMO, switching to ext4 is a very bad idea, because ext4 doesn't support online resize2fs, while ext3 does, so switching to ext4 is breaking cloud-init!!! It supports it just fine. (I just resized a 4TB volume to 10TB)... online.

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Common SSH

2013-12-30 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 26/12/13 20:05 +0200, Sergey Skripnick wrote: Hi all, I'm surprised there is no common ssh library in oslo so I filed this blueprint[0]. I would be happy to address any comments/suggestions. [0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/common-ssh-client If you think the BP is ready

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Proposal for dd disk i/o performance blueprint of cinder.

2013-12-30 Thread Flavio Percoco
Hey, Please, tag emails' subjects. Thanks, FF On 26/12/13 16:56 +0900, cosmos cosmos wrote: Hello. My name is Rucia for Samsung SDS. I had in truouble in volume deleting. I am developing for supporting big data storage such as hadoop in lvm. it use as a full disk io for deleting of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of default ephemeral fs to ext4

2013-12-30 Thread Day, Phil
Sent from Samsung Mobile Original message From: Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com Date: To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc: Day, Phil philip@hp.com Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack][HEAT][Template][Dashboard] HEAT editing dashboard

2013-12-30 Thread Jay Lau
Hi, I noticed that there is a bp https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/heat-template-managementwhich want to improve the UI for HEAT template, does anyone working on this? If not, does anyone who have some mock up dashboard for editing heat template? Thanks, Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of default ephemeral fs to ext4

2013-12-30 Thread Pádraig Brady
On 12/30/2013 12:39 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: On 12/29/2013 08:12 AM, Day, Phil wrote: Hi Folks, As highlighted in the thread “minimal review period for functional changes” I’d like to propose that change is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/63209/ is reverted because: - It causes

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of default ephemeral fs to ext4

2013-12-30 Thread Tim Bell
There is a big difference between DocImpact (i.e. needing some improvements to the doc) and putting the migration effort onto the users without automation to help... as I have said previously, while this (and others like it) may be a worthwhile change in isolation, making the upgrade process

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] import only module message and #noqa

2013-12-30 Thread Gabriel pettier
So Tatiana pointed http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-June/thread.html#9993 to me, and from there i went on to read http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-August/thread.html#13074 and i can see valid points for H302, even if it annoy me sometime, if it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest][qa] Adding tags to commit messages

2013-12-30 Thread David Kranz
On 12/29/2013 07:45 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2013-12-29 15:09:24 -0500 (-0500), David Kranz wrote: [...] Looking at the docs I see the warning that you can't put this in the search field so I tried putting it directly in the url like the other parameters but it was ignored. Is there indeed

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][keystone] Is the user password too simple?

2013-12-30 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2013-12-30 23:15:06 +0800 (+0800), Thomas Goirand wrote: On 12/30/2013 02:55 PM, li-zheming wrote: [...] I consider that it must be limited when set password, like this: 1. inlcude uppper and lower letters 2. include nums 3. include particular symbol,such as '_',''

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][keystone] Is the user password too simple?

2013-12-30 Thread Gabriel pettier
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:15:06PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 12/30/2013 02:55 PM, li-zheming wrote: hi all: when create user, you can set user password. You can set password as a simple word 'a'. the password is too simple but not limit. if someone want to steal your

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Proposal to add Auston McReynolds to trove-core

2013-12-30 Thread Robert Myers
+1 On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Michael Basnight mbasni...@gmail.comwrote: Howdy, Im proposing Auston McReynolds (amcrn) to trove-core. Auston has been working with trove for a while now. He is a great reviewer. He is incredibly thorough, and has caught more than one critical error

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Proposal to add Auston McReynolds to trove-core

2013-12-30 Thread Daniel Morris
+1 From: Michael Basnight mbasni...@gmail.commailto:mbasni...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Friday, December 27, 2013 4:48 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest][qa] Adding tags to commit messages

2013-12-30 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2013-12-30 10:25:07 -0500 (-0500), David Kranz wrote: I get that but it seems like this is a single field per gerrit user. Is that not true? If true, it is not useful because the point is that we want to be able to filter reviews that contain changes to tests for a particular project. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2013-12-30 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 12/30/2013 06:02 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 30 December 2013 22:51, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: IMO, switching to ext4 is a very bad idea, because ext4 doesn't support online resize2fs, while ext3 does, so switching to ext4 is breaking cloud-init!!! It supports it just

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [qa][FWaaS][Neutron]Firewall service disabled on gate

2013-12-30 Thread Clark Boylan
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote: Yair, The FWaaS tempest tests were not planned for H release. They are planned for the current release (hence the blueprint) and some of us were working towards them. This is also a standing discuss item this

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Proposal to add Auston McReynolds to trove-core

2013-12-30 Thread Greg Hill
+1 On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Michael Basnight mbasni...@gmail.commailto:mbasni...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, Im proposing Auston McReynolds (amcrn) to trove-core. Auston has been working with trove for a while now. He is a great reviewer. He is incredibly thorough, and has caught more than

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][mistral] scheduled tasks

2013-12-30 Thread Joshua Harlow
Any reason to not use taskflow (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/TaskFlow) to help u here?? I think it could be easily adapted to do what u want, and would save u from having to recreate the same task execution logic that everyone seems to rebuild… -Josh From: Greg Hill

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Proposal to add Auston McReynolds to trove-core

2013-12-30 Thread Craig Vyvial
+1 On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Greg Hill greg.h...@rackspace.com wrote: +1 On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Michael Basnight mbasni...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, Im proposing Auston McReynolds (amcrn) to trove-core. Auston has been working with trove for a while now. He is a great

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][mistral] scheduled tasks

2013-12-30 Thread Greg Hill
I accidentally sent this reply to Josh directly. Greg On Dec 30, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Greg Hill greg.h...@rackspace.commailto:greg.h...@rackspace.com wrote: Taskflow seems like it would be a good fit for implementation or re-implementation of some of the tasks we hope to automate, but the first

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of default ephemeral fs to ext4

2013-12-30 Thread Day, Phil
Hi, so it seems we were saying the same thing - new vms get a shared blank (empty) file system, not blank disc. How big a problem it is that in many cases this will be the already created ext3 disk and not ext4 depends I guess on how important consistency is to you (to me its pretty

[openstack-dev] [all project] log files and logstash

2013-12-30 Thread David Kranz
In case any one other than me didn't know this, the log files that are indexed and searchable in logstash are not the same as the set of files that you see in the logs directory in jenkins, but only those that have an entry in

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove] Proposal to add Auston McReynolds to trove-core

2013-12-30 Thread Vipul Sabhaya
+1 Sent from my iPhone On Dec 30, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Craig Vyvial cp16...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Greg Hill greg.h...@rackspace.com wrote: +1 On Dec 27, 2013, at 4:48 PM, Michael Basnight mbasni...@gmail.com wrote: Howdy, Im proposing Auston

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][keystone] Is the user password too simple?

2013-12-30 Thread Brant Knudson
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 12:55 AM, li-zheming li-zhem...@163.com wrote: hi all: when create user, you can set user password. You can set password as a simple word 'a'. the password is too simple but not limit. if someone want to steal your password, it is so easily(such as exhaustion).

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2013-12-30 Thread Day, Phil
I wonder if at least part of the problem is that whilst we have prioritisation for bugs (via severity) and blueprints (via approval and target release) that doesn't obviously carry through into gerrit. If it was easier to see what we're high and low priory changes it might be easier to decide

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Grizzly - Havanna db migration bug/1245502 still biting me?

2013-12-30 Thread Jonathan Proulx
ah, because the patched version won't work if you've already run the unpatched version, would be nice if that had been captured in the bug but did dig it out of http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2013-October/002481.html On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jonathan Proulx

Re: [openstack-dev] django-bootstrap-form django 1.4 / 1.5

2013-12-30 Thread Sascha Peilicke
Am 30.12.2013 08:31, schrieb Thomas Goirand: Hi, Currently, in the global-requirements.txt, we have: Django=1.4,1.6 django-bootstrap-form However, django-bootstrap-form fail in both Django 1.4 and Django 1.6. What's the way forward? Would it be possible that someone makes a patch for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2013-12-30 Thread Clark Boylan
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote: I wonder if at least part of the problem is that whilst we have prioritisation for bugs (via severity) and blueprints (via approval and target release) that doesn't obviously carry through into gerrit. If it was easier

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-30 Thread Kevin L. Mitchell
On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 11:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: I like the idea of having custom tags. I'm a bit concerned about the implications this might have with cross-project collaborations. I mean, people contributing to more projects will have to be aware of the many possible differences in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Grizzly - Havanna db migration bug/1245502 still biting me?

2013-12-30 Thread Jonathan Proulx
Should have tried that first I suppose, even after reverting (clean schema at https://gist.github.com/jon-proulx/abb6af1ab7f3133671d2) sync fails # nova-manage db sync Command failed, please check log for more info 2013-12-30 14:45:28.633 29427 CRITICAL nova [-] (OperationalError) (1032, Can't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Tempest]Tracking of blueprints and changes

2013-12-30 Thread David Kranz
On 12/27/2013 05:27 AM, Nadya Privalova wrote: Hello guys! I hope all of you are enjoying the holidays! But I'd like to raise a Tempest question. Again. I hope this email will not be lost after vacations :) After the summit we decided to track all tests that are being created for Ceilometer

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][mistral] scheduled tasks

2013-12-30 Thread Brian Rosmaita
Greg, This might be useful: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Qonos-scheduling-service There's a link to the code repository at the bottom of the document. It might be kind of overkill for what you want, though. cheers, brian From: Greg Hill

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting time - change to 1300 UTC or 1500 UTC?

2013-12-30 Thread Collins, Sean
OK - if nobody has any objections, we'll start the new meetings up at 1500 UTC - that appears to be the time that everyone is OK with? -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Meeting time - change to 1300 UTC or 1500 UTC?

2013-12-30 Thread Collins, Sean
Spoke too soon – I think 1500 UTC on Thursdays is already taken, we'd have to change days. -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][mistral] scheduled tasks

2013-12-30 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
Hi, I would suggest to talk with Mistral team about scheduling. As I know right now thay are writing a PoC code which will have scheduling functionality. Mistral in contrary to Qonos does not require worker process. In Mistral you can create a task with scheduler and API call back so that Mistral

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] minimum review period for functional changes that break backwards compatibility

2013-12-30 Thread Sean Dague
On 12/29/2013 07:58 PM, Day, Phil wrote: Hi Sean, I'm not convinced the comparison to my clean shut down change is valid here. For sure that proved that beyond a certain point (in that case months) there is no additional value in extending the review period, and no amount of review will

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-30 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 30/12/13 13:44 -0600, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 11:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: I like the idea of having custom tags. I'm a bit concerned about the implications this might have with cross-project collaborations. I mean, people contributing to more projects will have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2013-12-30 Thread Collins, Sean
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 02:13:59PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 12/23/2013 12:10 PM, Collins, Sean wrote: I also think we need to have these systems prove themselves on reliability before they post votes back. A mis configured CI system can easily -1 the entire patch stream, and many of us use

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] - Revert change of default ephemeral fs to ext4

2013-12-30 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Day, Phil's message of 2013-12-30 11:05:17 -0800: Hi, so it seems we were saying the same thing - new vms get a shared blank (empty) file system, not blank disc. How big a problem it is that in many cases this will be the already created ext3 disk and not ext4 depends I guess

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][3rd Party Testing]Remove voting until your testing structure works.

2013-12-30 Thread Anita Kuno
Please. When your third party testing structure votes on patches and your testing structure is not stable, it will vote with a -1 on patches. This results in three consequences: 1. The patch it votes on starts a countdown for abandonment, this is frustrating for developers. 2. Reviewers who use

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Availability of external testing logs

2013-12-30 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 12/23/2013 12:10 PM, Collins, Sean wrote: On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:30:50PM +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote: I would suggest that external jobs should not vote until logs are publicly accessible, otherwise contributors

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest][qa] Adding tags to commit messages

2013-12-30 Thread David Kranz
On Dec 30, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2013-12-30 10:25:07 -0500 (-0500), David Kranz wrote: I get that but it seems like this is a single field per gerrit user. Is that not true? If true, it is not useful because the point is that we want to be able to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest][qa] Adding tags to commit messages

2013-12-30 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2013-12-30 22:46:24 -0500 (-0500), David Kranz wrote: Looks like 2.8 came out recently and fixes this. It is mentioned near the top of http://ostrovsky.org/gerrit-code-review-2-8-released/. Awesome! Is there a planned time to upgrade? It's a priority, but the upgrade process is still

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][mistral] scheduled tasks

2013-12-30 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Greg, Georgy is right. We’re now actively working on PoC and we’ve already implemented the functionality we initially planned, including cron-based scheduling. You can take a look at our repo and evaluate what we’ve done, we’d be very glad to hear some feedback from anyone potentially

Re: [openstack-dev] [trove][mistral] scheduled tasks

2013-12-30 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Sorry for being a little bit verbose :) … Renat ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Tempest]Tracking of blueprints and changes

2013-12-30 Thread Nadya Privalova
Hello all, Thank you for your suggestions about tracking bps. I'll create a spreadsheet. David, 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55276/ is ready for review 2. We decided to move base.py to a separate change request: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64304/ to make it merged ASAP. But now I