Re: [openstack-dev] Validation of IP

2014-01-21 Thread Assaf Muller
You can instead use netaddr: import netaddr try: netaddr.IPAddress(input) except AddrFormatError: logging.error('Nope!') else: doSomethingWith(input) You could also: if netaddr.IPAddress('10.0.0.1') in netaddr.IPNetwork('10.0.0.0/8'): logging.error('Yup!') Assaf Muller, Cloud

[openstack-dev] FW: Installing Havana release along with Ceph storage

2014-01-21 Thread Lalitha Maruthachalam
Can someone please respond to the following mail incase you are aware of any document? -Original Message- From: Lalitha Maruthachalam Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:49 PM To: Dnsbed Ops; openst...@lists.openstack.org; openstack-d...@lists.openstack.org Subject: [Openstack-docs]

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron]About creating vms without ip address

2014-01-21 Thread Dong Liu
Hi fellow OpenStackers I found that we could not create vms without ip address. But in the telecom scene, the ip address usually managed by the telecom network element themselves. So they need a vm without ip address and configurate it through some specific method. How can we provide a kind of

Re: [openstack-dev] Can somebody help me to determine if an URL validation in python-glanceclient horizon projects is safe

2014-01-21 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 20/01/14 17:43 +, Victor Joel Morales Ruvalcaba wrote: I'm implementing an URL validation that checks if the external location value provided exists and if it's reachable. To achieve that I'm using the method urlopen of six.moves.urllib.request module which it seems similar like to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest - Stress test] : cleanup() removing resources for all tenants with an admin_manager

2014-01-21 Thread LELOUP Julien
Hello Boris, I'll check Rally in order to see what tool is the best for my tests. Best Regards, Julien LELOUP julien.lel...@3ds.com From: Boris Pavlovic [mailto:bpavlo...@mirantis.com] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 5:52 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2014-01-21 Thread Ian Wells
Document updated to talk about network aware scheduling ( https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vadqmurlnlvZ5bv3BlUbFeXRS_wh-dsgi5plSjimWjU/edit#- section just before the use case list). Based on yesterday's meeting, rkukura would also like to see network-aware scheduling to work for non-PCI cases

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] paramiko requirement of = 1.9.0?

2014-01-21 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hey Matt, that's correct, we should bump paramiko version to = 1.9.0. It was released more than year ago and so all of us use paramiko = 1.9.0 Thanks for catching this. On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote: jon, please confirm a suspicion of mine. the

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] paramiko requirement of = 1.9.0?

2014-01-21 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Here is a change for global-requirements https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68088/ On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote: Hey Matt, that's correct, we should bump paramiko version to = 1.9.0. It was released more than year ago and so all of us use

Re: [openstack-dev] Next steps for Whole Host allocation / Pclouds

2014-01-21 Thread Day, Phil
So, I actually don't think the two concepts (reservations and isolated instances) are competing ideas. Isolated instances are actually not reserved. They are simply instances that have a condition placed on their assignment to a particular compute node that the node must only be

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Selectively disabling certain built in iptables rules

2014-01-21 Thread CARVER, PAUL
Feel free to tell me this is a bad idea and scold me for even asking, but please help me figure out how to do it anyway. This is for a specific tenant in a specific lab that was built specifically for that one tenant to do some experimental work that requires VMs to route and other VMs to act

Re: [openstack-dev] Climate - Was: Next steps for Whole Host allocation / Pclouds

2014-01-21 Thread Day, Phil
Hi Phil and Jay, Phil, maybe you remember I discussed with you about the possibility of using pclouds with Climate, but we finally ended up using Nova aggregates and a dedicated filter. That works pretty fine. We don't use instance_properties but rather aggregate metadata but the idea

Re: [openstack-dev] Top Gate Reseting issues that need attention - Tuesday morning update

2014-01-21 Thread Sean Dague
Brief update on where we stand on the gate (still not great) - gate is currently 126 deep - top of queue entered 51hrs ago Bug 1270680 - v3 extensions api inherently racey wrt instances - patch landed (seems to have helped though the exception is still showing up quite a bit, so don't know if

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Selectively disabling certain built in iptables rules

2014-01-21 Thread Ian Wells
Paul, There's an extension for this that is, I think, presently only implemented by the Nicira plugin. Look for portsecurity. Whatever they do is probably the way you should do it too. Cheers, -- Ian. On 21 January 2014 13:10, CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com wrote: Feel free to tell me this

Re: [openstack-dev] Climate - Was: Next steps for Whole Host allocation / Pclouds

2014-01-21 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi Phil, Le 21/01/2014 13:13, Day, Phil a écrit : Hi Phil and Jay, Phil, maybe you remember I discussed with you about the possibility of using pclouds with Climate, but we finally ended up using Nova aggregates and a dedicated filter. That works pretty fine. We don't use instance_properties

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Selectively disabling certain built in iptables rules

2014-01-21 Thread Darragh O'Reilly
I think there is a blueprint for that. Anyway, see idea for current releases below: Feel free to tell me this is a bad idea and scold me for even asking, but please help me figure out how to do it anyway. This is for a specific tenant in a specific lab that was built specifically for that

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Libvirt driver platform support

2014-01-21 Thread balaj...@freescale.com
Hi, Libvert driver has the below code snippet, where it assumes that the Host platform supports pit etc when libvirt is configured for KVM. For PowerPC [Freescale] platform below code is causing issues. Code snippet from driver.py: if CONF.libvirt_type == kvm: # TODO(berrange) One

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Libvirt driver platform support

2014-01-21 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 01:19:32PM +, balaj...@freescale.com wrote: Hi, Libvert driver has the below code snippet, where it assumes that the Host platform supports pit etc when libvirt is configured for KVM. For PowerPC [Freescale] platform below code is causing issues. Code

Re: [openstack-dev] Disabling file injection *by default*

2014-01-21 Thread Russell Bryant
On 01/20/2014 09:29 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I was reminded of this while I cleaned up failed file injection nbd devices on ci-overcloud.tripleo.org :/ - what needs to happen for us to change the defaults around file injection so that it's disabled? It should use libguestfs for file injection

Re: [openstack-dev] Next steps for Whole Host allocation / Pclouds

2014-01-21 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 21/01/2014 12:57, Day, Phil a écrit : So, I actually don't think the two concepts (reservations and isolated instances) are competing ideas. Isolated instances are actually not reserved. They are simply instances that have a condition placed on their assignment to a particular compute node

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [devstack-gate] Nominating Sean Dague for devstack-gate-core

2014-01-21 Thread Anita Kuno
On 01/03/2014 12:46 PM, James E. Blair wrote: Occasionally it becomes clear that a part of the project infrastructure has its own community interested in it. Such is the case with devstack-gate, which is the nexus of infra and openstack. Not only does it interact with infrastructure systems

Re: [openstack-dev] Next steps for Whole Host allocation / Pclouds

2014-01-21 Thread Khanh-Toan Tran
Exactly - that's why I wanted to start this debate about the way forward for the Pcloud Blueprint, which was heading into some kind of middle ground. As per my original post, and it sounds like the three of us are at least aligned I'm proposing to spilt this into two streams: i) A

Re: [openstack-dev] Next steps for Whole Host allocation / Pclouds

2014-01-21 Thread Day, Phil
I think there is clear water between this and the existing aggregate based isolation. I also think this is a different use case from reservations. It's *mostly* like a new scheduler hint, but because it has billing impacts I think it needs to be more than just that - for example the

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-21 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi folks, when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles, there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to call for action and think a bit about the term for concept currently known as Role (= Resource Category). Definition: Role is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-21 Thread Tzu-Mainn Chen
Thanks for starting this! Comments in-line: Hi folks, when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles, there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to call for action and think a bit about the term for concept currently known as Role (= Resource

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-21 Thread Dougal Matthews
On 21/01/14 14:19, Jaromir Coufal wrote: when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles, there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to call for action and think a bit about the term for concept currently known as Role (= Resource Category). This

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Li (baoli)
Just one comment: The devices allocated for an instance are immediately known after the domain is created. Therefore it's possible to do a port update and have the device configured while the instance is booting. --Robert On 1/19/14 2:15 AM, Irena Berezovsky ire...@mellanox.com wrote: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] Next steps for Whole Host allocation / Pclouds

2014-01-21 Thread Mike Spreitzer
I want to explore the linkage between the proposed exclusive use filter and scheduling a little more. At the Icehouse summit I heard the concern that without advance preparation, there may well be zero hosts that are acceptable. Why is that not a concern now? What does the Nova scheduler do

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] PCI pass-through network support

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Li (baoli)
Yunhong, Just try to understand your use case: -- a VM can only work with cards from vendor V1 -- a VM can work with cards from both vendor V1 and V2 So stats in the two flavors will overlap in the PCI flavor solution. I'm just trying to say that this is something that needs to be

[openstack-dev] [requirements][oslo] Upgrade six to 1.5.2?

2014-01-21 Thread ZhiQiang Fan
six 1.5.2 has been released on 2014-01-06, it provides urllib/urlparse compatibility. Is there any plan to upgrade six to 1.5.2? (since it is fresh new, may need some time to test) six 1.4.1 is lack of urllib/urlparse support, so oslo-incubator/py3kcompat is needed, and it is used in some

Re: [openstack-dev] Top Gate Reseting issues that need attention - Tuesday morning update

2014-01-21 Thread Russell Bryant
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/21/2014 07:14 AM, Sean Dague wrote: Brief update on where we stand on the gate (still not great) - gate is currently 126 deep - top of queue entered 51hrs ago Bug 1270680 - v3 extensions api inherently racey wrt instances - patch landed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-01-21 Thread Collins, Sean
I don't see a second new attribute being proposed - I only see one new one and the existing enable_dhcp attribute. Can we get a writeup of what is being proposed? -- Sean M. Collins ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Diesel] Proposal for new project

2014-01-21 Thread Raymond, Rob
Hi Adrian, Jay and Raj Thanks for your responses on relationship between Solum and Diesel. It does sound like they are in the same domain. My feeling was that it was a very different approach where Solum was aimed at developer, Diesel was aimed at the cloud provider. In some companies these roles

Re: [openstack-dev] Next steps for Whole Host allocation / Pclouds

2014-01-21 Thread Day, Phil
-Original Message- From: Khanh-Toan Tran [mailto:khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.com] Sent: 21 January 2014 14:21 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Next steps for Whole Host allocation / Pclouds Exactly - that's why I wanted

Re: [openstack-dev] [Diesel] Proposal for new project

2014-01-21 Thread Russell Bryant
On 01/21/2014 11:31 AM, Raymond, Rob wrote: Hi Adrian, Jay and Raj Thanks for your responses on relationship between Solum and Diesel. It does sound like they are in the same domain. My feeling was that it was a very different approach where Solum was aimed at developer, Diesel was aimed at

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Renat Akhmerov
On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:00, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com wrote: (I don't buy the problem with large amounts of dependencies, if you have a meta-package you just have one line in requirements and pip will figure the rest out.) +1 Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc.

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Renat Akhmerov
On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:06, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: On 17 January 2014 09:22, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote: Since it’s pretty easy to get lost among all the opinions I’d like to clarify/ask a couple of things: Keeping all the clients physically

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Jesse Noller
On Jan 21, 2014, at 10:54 AM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.commailto:rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote: On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:00, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.commailto:jamielen...@redhat.com wrote: (I don't buy the problem with large amounts of dependencies, if you have a meta-package

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Renat Akhmerov
On 18 Jan 2014, at 07:48, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: I also think auto generated clients have a lot of challenges in the same way that full javascript pages in browsers have. If you screw up in a subtle way you can just completely disable your clients from connecting to your server

[openstack-dev] Unified Guest Agent, PoC for os-collect-config

2014-01-21 Thread Dmitry Mescheryakov
Hello folks, At the end of the previous discussion on the topic [1] I've decided to make a PoC based on oslo.messaging. Clint suggested and I agreed to make it for os-collect-config. Actually I've made a PoC for Savanna first :-) but anyway here is the one for os-collect-config [2]. I've made a

Re: [openstack-dev] [savanna] client release 0.4.1

2014-01-21 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
python-savannaclient 0.4.1 will be available in savanna repos after https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66723/ will be merged. On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote: 0.4.1 python-savannaclient released. pypi:

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [devstack-gate] Nominating Sean Dague for devstack-gate-core

2014-01-21 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
FWIW +1 On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 01/03/2014 12:46 PM, James E. Blair wrote: Occasionally it becomes clear that a part of the project infrastructure has its own community interested in it. Such is the case with devstack-gate, which is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] hacking checks for infra projects

2014-01-21 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
James, do you have any thoughts on it? On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.comwrote: Hi folks, I think that we can enable hacking checks for python infra projects to help themselves write better code. Probably we should enable only specific subset of

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/21/2014 11:54 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote: On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:00, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com mailto:jamielen...@redhat.com wrote: (I don't buy the problem with large amounts of dependencies, if you have a meta-package you just have one line in requirements and pip will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][3rd Party Testing] Jenkins setup

2014-01-21 Thread Lucas Eznarriaga
Hi, For step 3/5, is the right procedure. Or is there a way to use a cmd to run all the tests and use a different mechanism to specify a filter for the tests to be run. I don't know if Tempest allows you to filter for the tests to be run. I'm following these steps to configure Jenkins but I

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [devstack-gate] Nominating Sean Dague for devstack-gate-core

2014-01-21 Thread Monty Taylor
On 01/03/2014 09:46 AM, James E. Blair wrote: Occasionally it becomes clear that a part of the project infrastructure has its own community interested in it. Such is the case with devstack-gate, which is the nexus of infra and openstack. Not only does it interact with infrastructure systems

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Cherry picking commit from oslo-incubator

2014-01-21 Thread Joe Gordon
On Jan 17, 2014 12:24 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On 2014-01-16 13:48, John Griffith wrote: Hey Everyone, A review came up today that

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Alexei Kornienko
Hello, I would like to end this requirements talk cause it doesn't make any sense in term of python clients. Initially the discussion was about many clients projects with separate requirements VS single client project with single requirements list. At that moment we should have stop and actually

Re: [openstack-dev] question of vcpu-memory-hotplug progress

2014-01-21 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Jan 18, 2014, at 12:03 AM, Wangshen (Peter) pete...@huawei.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 1:01 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Jinbo (Justin) Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Cherry picking commit from oslo-incubator

2014-01-21 Thread Sean Dague
On 01/21/2014 01:14 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Jan 17, 2014 12:24 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com mailto:openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Alexei Kornienko
I would like to propose to use this thread to gather and discuss software requirements that our clients should meet. Later we'll summarize all the requirements and use them during our work of improving the clients. By reaching listed requirements we'll be able to evaluate the success of our

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Jesse Noller
On Jan 21, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Alexei Kornienko alexei.kornie...@gmail.commailto:alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I would like to end this requirements talk cause it doesn't make any sense in term of python clients. Initially the discussion was about many clients projects with separate

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][3rd Party Testing] Jenkins setup

2014-01-21 Thread Sreeram Yerrapragada
For vmware minesweeper ,we filter tests following way: 1. testr list-tests alltests 2. exclude-tests (file with test names we want to filter) 3. alltests - excludetests = tests_to_be_run 4. testr run —load-list=tests_to_be_run hope that helps On Jan 21, 2014, at 9:56 AM, Lucas Eznarriaga

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Jamie Lennox
don't do this here - the thread is way too deep already. If we get into discussing individual points let's do one question per thread and prefix the emails with [client] or something to tie it all together - Original Message - From: Alexei Kornienko alexei.kornie...@gmail.com To:

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Alexei Kornienko
It is when most openstack clouds don’t just run keystone. Or nova, or swift. Or when each client acts, smells and behaves differently. It matters a LOT when you’re trying to write applications on top of a mature openstack deployment. I still don't understand the problem here. Installed packages

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Selectively disabling certain built in iptables rules

2014-01-21 Thread Darragh O'Reilly
Darragh O'Reilly wrote: Neutron does not know about flavors or images. But it has ports which have a name attribute that can be set to an arbitrary string, e.g. 'anti_spoof_off'. The name does not need to be unique within the tenant. Then your overridden methods could check for that string.

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Jesse Noller
On Jan 21, 2014, at 12:59 PM, Alexei Kornienko alexei.kornie...@gmail.commailto:alexei.kornie...@gmail.com wrote: It is when most openstack clouds don’t just run keystone. Or nova, or swift. Or when each client acts, smells and behaves differently. It matters a LOT when you’re trying to write

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Cherry picking commit from oslo-incubator

2014-01-21 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Jan 17, 2014 12:24 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On 2014-01-16 13:48, John

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Cherry picking commit from oslo-incubator

2014-01-21 Thread Ben Nemec
On 2014-01-21 12:28, Sean Dague wrote: On 01/21/2014 01:14 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Jan 17, 2014 12:24 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com mailto:fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 16/01/14 17:32 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Renat Akhmerov
On 21 Jan 2014, at 09:07, Jesse Noller jesse.nol...@rackspace.com wrote: Do you use any other platform than Linux? Even donald - one of the python packaging leads and PyPI leads said this is a bad end-user experience for consumers of openstack clouds. That fact that someone (even very

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Renat Akhmerov
On 21 Jan 2014, at 09:40, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/21/2014 11:54 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote: On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:00, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com mailto:jamielen...@redhat.com wrote: (I don't buy the problem with large amounts of dependencies, if you have a

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Repositoris re-organization

2014-01-21 Thread Alexander Tivelkov
Hi folks, As we are moving towards incubation application, I took a closer look at what is going on with our repositories. An here is what I found. We currently have 11 repositories at stackforge: - murano-api - murano-conductor - murano-repository - murano-dashboard -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday January 21st at 19:00 UTC

2014-01-21 Thread Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Elizabeth Krumbach Joseph l...@princessleia.com wrote: The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting tomorrow, Tuesday January 21st, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting minutes and log: Minutes:

Re: [openstack-dev] a common client library

2014-01-21 Thread Renat Akhmerov
+1 for opening new threads regarding specific questions. On 21 Jan 2014, at 11:54, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote: On 21 Jan 2014, at 09:40, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 01/21/2014 11:54 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote: On 17 Jan 2014, at 22:00, Jamie Lennox

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Relationship between Neutron LBaaS and Libra

2014-01-21 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Jan 19, 2014, at 8:19 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message of 2014-01-19 01:52:56 -0800: Hi, I haven’t read through those (need to go spend time with family so replying quickly) but given the dates the planning phases for Quantum/Neutron LBaaS

[openstack-dev] [TripleO][Neutron] PMTUd broken in gre networks

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Collins
Hi, https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1270646 - we've triaged this as critical in TripleO, because by default GRE overlay networks will cause huge fragmentation in the datacentre LAN. We're looking for someone to 'own' this bug (in tripleo) and drive getting a real, permanent fix /

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron should disallow /32 CIDR

2014-01-21 Thread Paul Ward
Currently, NeutronDbPluginV2._validate_allocation_pools() does some very basic checking to be sure the specified subnet is valid. One thing that's missing is checking for a CIDR of /32. A subnet with one IP address in it is unusable as the sole IP address will be allocated to the gateway, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Neutron] PMTUd broken in gre networks

2014-01-21 Thread Ian Wells
On 21 January 2014 21:23, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: In OpenStack we've got documentation[1] that advises setting a low MTU for tenants to workaround this issue (but the issue itself is unsolved) - this is a problem because PMTU is fairly important :) Lowering *every*

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Can someone from the Nova core team please take a look at patch 40467

2014-01-21 Thread Joe Gordon
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Genin, Daniel I. daniel.ge...@jhuapl.eduwrote: Hello Nova core team, I have three small patches implementing ephemeral storage encryption for LVM backed instances.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron should disallow /32 CIDR

2014-01-21 Thread Edgar Magana
Wouldn't be easier just to check if: cidr is 32? I believe it is a good idea to not allow /32 network but this is just my opinion Edgar From: Paul Ward wpw...@us.ibm.com Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:35 PM To: OpenStack List

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron should disallow /32 CIDR

2014-01-21 Thread Ian Wells
/30 is the minimum allowable mask, not /31. On 21 January 2014 22:04, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote: Wouldn't be easier just to check if: cidr is 32? I believe it is a good idea to not allow /32 network but this is just my opinion Edgar From: Paul Ward wpw...@us.ibm.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] negative test framework: ready for review

2014-01-21 Thread Joe Gordon
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Koderer, Marc m.kode...@telekom.de wrote: Hi all, first part of the negative test framework is ready for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64733/ Please have a look.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Third-party drivers and testing

2014-01-21 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Christopher Yeoh cbky...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: 1. each driver must adhere to the existing driver interfaces. 2. each driver must have comprehensive unit test coverage and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron should disallow /32 CIDR

2014-01-21 Thread Carl Perry
Using a /32 has use cases. When trying to build a L3 only routed network /32 routes are required. While it can be inconvenient for the more generic L2 network use case, I wouldn't remove it since there are other use cases where it is useful. -Carl On 01/21/2014 12:35 PM, Paul Ward wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] Sync up patches

2014-01-21 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com wrote: OK, it looks like the concensus is that we don't try and keep the gantt tree in sync with nova instead we: 1) Get the current gantt tree to pass unit tests 2) Get gantt to pass integration tests (e.g. get

Re: [openstack-dev] Disabling file injection *by default*

2014-01-21 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
[CC'ed libguestfs author, Rich Jones] Heya, On 01/21/2014 07:59 AM, Robert Collins wrote: I was reminded of this while I cleaned up failed file injection nbd devices on ci-overcloud.tripleo.org :/ - what needs to happen for us to change the defaults around file injection so that it's

Re: [openstack-dev] Disabling file injection *by default*

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Collins
On 22 January 2014 10:50, Kashyap Chamarthy kcham...@redhat.com wrote: [CC'ed libguestfs author, Rich Jones] Heya, On 01/21/2014 07:59 AM, Robert Collins wrote: I was reminded of this while I cleaned up failed file injection nbd devices on ci-overcloud.tripleo.org :/ - what needs to happen

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] PCI passthrough SRIOV

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Li (baoli)
Hi Folks, As the debate about PCI flavor versus host aggregate goes on, I'd like to move forward with the SRIOV side of things in the same time. I know that tomorrow's IRC will be focusing on the BP review, and it may well continue into Thursday. Therefore, let's start discussing SRIOV side of

Re: [openstack-dev] Disabling file injection *by default*

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Collins
On 22 January 2014 03:03, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/20/2014 09:29 PM, Robert Collins wrote: I was reminded of this while I cleaned up failed file injection nbd devices on ci-overcloud.tripleo.org :/ - what needs to happen for us to change the defaults around file injection

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Third-party drivers and testing

2014-01-21 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I've been thinking about how we should treat third-party drivers in Ironic for a while, and had several discussions at the

Re: [openstack-dev] Disabling file injection *by default*

2014-01-21 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:57:29AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: [...] I'm a bit surprised that file injection is on by default. I thought it was disabled by default upstream. (Just checked and it is enabled as you say.) So yes, file injection should be off by default, but read below. There's

Re: [openstack-dev] Top Gate Reseting issues that need attention - Tuesday morning update

2014-01-21 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I have some hints which the people looking at neutron failures might find useful. # 1 - in [1] a weird thing happens with DHCP. A DHCPDISCOVER with for fa:16:3e:cc:d9:c7 is pretty much simultaneously received by two dnsmasq instances, which are listening on ports belonging to two distinct

[openstack-dev] [gantt] How to include nova modules in unit tests

2014-01-21 Thread Dugger, Donald D
I almost have the unit tests for gantt working except for one problem - is there a way to have the test infrastructure allow the gantt tree to import objects from the nova tree. The problem is that we want to break out just the scheduler code into the gantt tree without duplicating all of

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Neutron] PMTUd broken in gre networks

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Collins
On 22 January 2014 10:01, Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote: On 21 January 2014 21:23, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: In OpenStack we've got documentation[1] that advises setting a low MTU for tenants to workaround this issue (but the issue itself is unsolved) - this is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-21 Thread Liz Blanchard
On Jan 21, 2014, at 9:40 AM, Dougal Matthews dou...@redhat.com wrote: On 21/01/14 14:19, Jaromir Coufal wrote: when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles, there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to call for action and think a bit about

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder unit test failure

2014-01-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 08:29 +0530, iKhan wrote: I am worried which one is better in terms of performance? iniparse or ConfigParser? I am aware iniparse will do a better job of maintaining INI file's structure, but I am more interested in performance. The parsing of INI files is the last

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] How to include nova modules in unit tests

2014-01-21 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi Don, Look at how Climate is doing this [1]. The idea is to pull the master tarball as an eggfile. That works fine, the only issues we have is when we register opts to CONF where we could get DuplicateOpt if we try to register opt with same name when importing. -Sylvain [1] :

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron should disallow /32 CIDR

2014-01-21 Thread Carl Baldwin
I think there may be some confusion between the two concepts: subnet and allocation pool. You are right that an ipv4 subnet smaller than /30 is not useable on a network. However, this method is checking the validity of an allocation pool. These pools should not include room for a gateway nor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] A pair of mode keywords

2014-01-21 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, Anthony: I think we are saying the same thing. Yes, there must be two parameters, and they are independent. What I mean of simplifying referred to the CLI. If user provides RA mode, then the 2nd parameter will have default value if user doesn't specify it. However, user can also indicate

Re: [openstack-dev] Unified Guest Agent, PoC for os-collect-config

2014-01-21 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Dmitry Mescheryakov's message of 2014-01-21 09:30:17 -0800: Hello folks, At the end of the previous discussion on the topic [1] I've decided to make a PoC based on oslo.messaging. Clint suggested and I agreed to make it for os-collect-config. Actually I've made a PoC for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Property protections not being enforced?

2014-01-21 Thread Mark Washenberger
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Tom Leaman t...@tomleaman.co.uk wrote: I'm looking at a possible bug here but I just want to confirm that I'm not missing something obvious. I'm currently working with Devstack on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Once Devstack is up and running, I'm creating a file

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Terminology Revival #1 - Roles

2014-01-21 Thread Tzu-Mainn Chen
On Jan 21, 2014, at 9:40 AM, Dougal Matthews dou...@redhat.com wrote: On 21/01/14 14:19, Jaromir Coufal wrote: when I was getting feedback on wireframes and we talked about Roles, there were various objections and not much suggestions. I would love to call for action and think a bit

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] How to include nova modules in unit tests

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Collins
On 22 January 2014 11:57, Dugger, Donald D donald.d.dug...@intel.com wrote: I almost have the unit tests for gantt working except for one problem – is there a way to have the test infrastructure allow the gantt tree to import objects from the nova tree. The problem is that we want to break

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder unit test failure

2014-01-21 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 08:29 +0530, iKhan wrote: I am worried which one is better in terms of performance? iniparse or ConfigParser? I am aware iniparse will do a better job of maintaining INI file's structure, but I am more

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] How to include nova modules in unit tests

2014-01-21 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Well, the first goal is to get the scheduler code into a separate tree, even though that code is still utilizing common code from nova. Right now just about every scheduler file includes some nova modules. Ultimately yes, we want to remove the depency on nova but that is a future effort and

Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] How to include nova modules in unit tests

2014-01-21 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Sylvain- Tnx, that worked great. (Now if I can just find a way to get the affinity tests working, all the other tests pass. I only have 17 tests failing out of 254.) -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 From: Sylvain Bauza

[openstack-dev] [fuel-dev] monitoring openstack services with nagios

2014-01-21 Thread Federico Michele Facca
Hi, for whoever may be interested for the version 3.2.1 of Fuel we documented a process to extend the set-up of fuel and related puppet scripts to deploy nagios services and use nagios to monitor “openstack” infrastructure status. We are working out also and iso (but will include also other

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron should disallow /32 CIDR

2014-01-21 Thread Paul Ward
Possibly, though I don't see code that checks the actual CIDR length. It seems to check CIDR correctness via IP correctness. ie, things like the ending IP not being smaller than the starting IP, etc. One change to my original message on what the fix is, we'd have to compare subnet_first_ip and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron should disallow /32 CIDR

2014-01-21 Thread Paul Ward
You beat me to it. :) I just responded about not checking the allocation pool start and end but rather, checking subnet_first_ip and subnet_last_ip, which is set as follows: subnet = netaddr.IPNetwork(subnet_cidr) subnet_first_ip = netaddr.IPAddress(subnet.first + 1)

Re: [openstack-dev] Havana Release V3 Extensions and new features to quota

2014-01-21 Thread Christopher Yeoh
Hi Vinod, On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Vinod Kumar Boppanna vinod.kumar.boppa...@cern.ch wrote: Hi, My name is Vinod Kumar Boppanna and I was testing the quota part in the OpenStack Havana Release. I had installed the Havana Release in a single VM through RDO process. During testing,

[openstack-dev] Neutron - run_tests.sh fails while creating a Virtual environment

2014-01-21 Thread Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville)
Hi folks, Does anyone have an idea why the run_tests.sh script fails when I run it with a run_tests.sh -v in Ubuntu. I have provided the output of the run_tests.sh -V. It tries to install python-mimeparse and then it raises an exception. See the exception below: Console log: Requirement

  1   2   >