Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote on 2014/01/30 00:52:14:
Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com
2014/01/30 00:52
Please respond to
openst...@nemebean.com
To
Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com,
cc
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Hi,
I am facing some errors running tests in a fresh installation of solum
$tox -e py27
gcc -pthread -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O2 -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -fPIC
-I/home/hadoop/work/openstack/solum-2/solum/.tox/py27/build/lxml/src/lxml/includes
-I/usr/include/python2.7
Hi Rajdeep,
We just updated the
documentationhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/67590/1/CONTRIBUTING.rst
recently
with some necessary packages to install : *libxml2-dev* and *libxslt-dev*.
You just need to install those 2 packages.
If you are on Ubuntu, see
Guys,
I'm trying to install IceHouse-2 in a dual-stacked environment (Ubuntu
14.04) but, keystone-manage db_sync doesn't work if db connection points
to a IPv6 address, like this:
My /etc/network/interfaces looks like:
---
# The loopback network interface
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
iface lo
Thanks Sandy to confirm the gap and pointing to me the CADF effort .. very
interresting with many impacts! I'll definitely follow that.
So I guess OpenStack can live with these notifications until we have better
things.
Anyway, I will be proposing may be a patch to oslo to temporarily fix this
Can you open a bug for this at https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone ? Thanks!
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ
thiagocmarti...@gmail.comwrote:
Guys,
I'm trying to install IceHouse-2 in a dual-stacked environment (Ubuntu
14.04) but, keystone-manage db_sync doesn't work if db
A blueprint is being discussed about the configurable locked vm api.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/configurable-locked-vm-api
The current implementation does check vm is locked using decorate func.
(@check_instance_lock)
For example)
@wrap_check_policy
I uploaded changes for this implementation.
Although It doesn't pass a jenkins test, It will be help to understand how
to implement.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70576/
2014-02-03 Jae Sang Lee hyan...@gmail.com:
A blueprint is being discussed about the configurable locked vm api.
Hi All,
LBaaS SSL support wiki page was updated with up-to-date design decisions:
1. SSL offload is a core LBaaS feature
2. Certificate's private key is always transient until secure storage is
available
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/
Eugene, you might want to add
Thanks that worked
On Sunday, February 2, 2014 7:17 PM, Julien Vey vey.jul...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rajdeep,
We just updated the documentation recently with some necessary packages to
install : libxml2-dev and libxslt-dev.
You just need to install those 2 packages.
If you are on Ubuntu,
On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 01:18:09AM -0500, Shixiong Shang wrote:
In other words, I can retrieve the values by:
subnet.ipv6_ra_mode
subnet.ipv6_address_mode
Is that correct? Would you please confirm?
Yes - that is the intent.
I just have to fix an issue with the DB column definitions, so
Sure! I'll...=)
On 2 February 2014 13:32, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you open a bug for this at https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone ?
Thanks!
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com
wrote:
Guys,
I'm trying to install
Excellent! Thanks for your confirmation, Sean!
On Feb 2, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Collins, Sean
sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 01, 2014 at 01:18:09AM -0500, Shixiong Shang wrote:
In other words, I can retrieve the values by:
subnet.ipv6_ra_mode
subnet.ipv6_address_mode
On 2014/30/01 12:59, Ladislav Smola wrote:
On 01/30/2014 12:39 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
On 01/30/2014 11:26 AM, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
[snip]
I am for implementing support for Heterogeneous hardware properly,
lifeless should post what he recommends soon, so I would rather discuss
that. We
On 2014/30/01 19:29, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
Wouldn't lying about the hardware specs when registering nodes be
problematic for upgrades? Users would have
to re-register their nodes.
+1 for problematic area here
One reason why a custom filter feels attractive is that it provides us
with a clear
On 2014/30/01 23:33, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
I was responding based on Treat similar hardware configuration as
equal. When there is a very minor difference in hardware (eg, 1TB vs
1.1TB disks), enrolling them with the same spec (1TB disk) is sufficient
to solve all these issues and mask
On 1 February 2014 10:03, Tzu-Mainn Chen tzuma...@redhat.com wrote:
So after reading the replies on this thread, it seems like I (and others
advocating
a custom scheduler) may have overthought things a bit. The reason this route
was
suggested was because of conflicting goals for Icehouse:
On Sun, 2014-02-02 at 07:13 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
Just noticed this at the end of a successful run:
http://logs.openstack.org/15/63215/13/check/check-tempest-dsvm-full/2636cae/console.html#_2014-02-02_12_02_44_422
It looks like the merge of oslo.messaging brings a huge amount of false
On 2014/30/01 21:28, Robert Collins wrote:
On 30 January 2014 23:26, Tomas Sedovic tsedo...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've seen some confusion regarding the homogenous hardware support as the
first step for the tripleo UI. I think it's time to make sure we're all on
the same page.
Here's what
On 2014/31/01 22:03, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote:
So after reading the replies on this thread, it seems like I (and others
advocating
a custom scheduler) may have overthought things a bit. The reason this route
was
suggested was because of conflicting goals for Icehouse:
a) homogeneous nodes (to
Will join remotely for a few hours each day (time zones and all). Nice
effort!
Thanks,
Avishay
From: Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 02/01/2014 10:09 AM
Subject:[openstack-dev] Cinder Stability
Hi Michael,
On 02 Feb 2014, at 06:19 , Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
I saw another case of the build succeeded message for a failure just
now... https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59101/ has a rebase failure
but was marked as successful.
Is this another case of hyper-v not being
It seems like there were a lot of failing Hyper-V CI jobs for nova
yesterday. Is there some systemic problem or did all those patches
really fail? An example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66291/
Michael
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Alessandro Pilotti
apilo...@cloudbasesolutions.com wrote:
On 02 Feb 2014, at 23:01 , Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
It seems like there were a lot of failing Hyper-V CI jobs for nova
yesterday. Is there some systemic problem or did all those patches
really fail? An example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66291/
We’re awere of this
Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-02-02 11:19:25 -0800:
On 2014/30/01 23:33, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
I was responding based on Treat similar hardware configuration as
equal. When there is a very minor difference in hardware (eg, 1TB vs
1.1TB disks), enrolling them with
On 31/01/14 21:50, Julien Danjou wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31 2014, Adrian Turjak wrote:
Is it working on Havana? As I've gone through and tried all the possible
state changes (reboot, suspend, pause, resize, terminate, etc), and not one
triggers a poll cycle outside of the standard polling
On 1 February 2014 10:03, Tzu-Mainn Chen tzuma...@redhat.com wrote:
So after reading the replies on this thread, it seems like I (and others
advocating
a custom scheduler) may have overthought things a bit. The reason this
route was
suggested was because of conflicting goals for
Hi,
This is a reminder that we will have a weekly community meeting in IRC
(#openstack-meeting) tomorrow at 16.00 UTC.
Here’s the agenda (also published at [0] along with links to the previous
meetings):
Review action items
Discuss capabilities and DSL again (since we now have new
Done.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1275615
I'll try it again tomorrow... Just to make sure it isn't me doing something
wrong...
Best!
Thiago
On 2 February 2014 15:58, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote:
Sure! I'll...=)
On 2 February 2014 13:32, Dolph Mathews
I just submitted dnsmasq related code to gerrit:
https://review.openstack.org/70649
This submission intended to implement “ipv6-two-attributes” BP and other three
blueprints (SLAAC, DHCPv6-Stateful, DHCPv6-Stateless) rooted from it. Please
review and let me know what you think.
Thanks in
Hi Sandhya,
Can you please elaborate how do you suggest to extend the below bp for SRIOV
Ports managed by different Mechanism Driver?
I am not biased to any specific direction here, just think we need common layer
for managing SRIOV port at neutron, since there is a common pass between nova
and
Hi,
Here is the blueprint about improvement of accessing to glance API server.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/improvement-of-accessing-to-glance
The summary of this bp is:
- Glance API Servers are categorized into two groups: Primary and
Secondary.
- Firstly, Nova tries to
32 matches
Mail list logo
