Oleg,
I'm very much interested in this.
I believe that as this distributed environment becomes more and more
complex, involving many different modules and teams it's becoming crucial
to have some common view (and maybe framework) for diagnostics and problem
resolution.
Thanks,
Ezra
IBM
Hi,
Amazon provides option to Import/Export VM.
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/vm-import/
does OpenStack has same feature ?
Have anyone started to implement this in Openstack ?. If yes, Please point
me to the blueprint. I would like to work on that.
Regards
Saju Madhavan
+91 09535134654
On 7 April 2014 09:06, Saju M sajup...@gmail.com wrote:
Amazon provides option to Import/Export VM.
http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/vm-import/
does OpenStack has same feature ?
Have anyone started to implement this in Openstack ?. If yes, Please point
me to the blueprint. I would like to work on
- Original Message -
Hi all,
we had a number of discussions last week in Moscow, with participation of
guys from Russia, Ukraine and Poland.
That was a great time!! Thanks everyone who participated.
Special thanks to Przemek for great preparations, including the following:
Hi,
There is number of additional network verifications that can improve
troubleshooting experience or even cluster perfomance, like:
1. multicast group verification for corosync messaging
2. network connectivity with jumbo packets
3. l3 connectivity verification
4. some fencing
On 04/06/2014 08:47 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
[...]
Yes, since the Trove midcycle meetup in February we've had a writer at
Tesora assigned to this task. It's a huge task though since we document
four distros so all the helping hands we can get would be great.
The distro experts in the team can
Hello Tripleo/Neutron:
I've recently found some cycles to look into Neutron. Mostly because
networking rocks, but also so we can perhaps better address Neutron
related issues/needs down the line. I thought it may be good to ask the
wider team if there are others that are also interested in
Hi folks,
There are two problems we should address regarding the growth and change
to the HOT specification.
First our +2/+A process for normal changes doesn't totally make sense
for hot_spec.rst. We generally have some informal bar for controversial
changes (of which changes to
Hi,
I'm fairly new to this list, actually this is my first email sent, and to
OpenStack in general, but I'm not new at all to VMware so I'll try to give
you my point of view about possible use case here.
Jay you are saying that by using Nova to manage ESXi hosts we don't need
vCenter because
Hi,
I am working on an OVS based implementation of Neutron Security Groups and came
across this blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ovs-firewall-driver
I've gone through every mail, document and IRC chat log on this to get a good
grasp of history on this, but couldn't
On 07/04/14 00:27, Steve Baker wrote:
On 05/04/14 04:47, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if the time has come to document what exactly are we
doing with tripleo-heat-templates and merge.py[1], figure out what needs
to happen to move away and raise the necessary blueprints on
Please elaborate, do you mean that the nodes could be on different zones/cells
or something else?
-Original Message-
From: Alun Champion [mailto:p...@achampion.net]
Sent: Sunday, April 06, 2014 4:51 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re:
Hi,
This is a reminder that we have another community meeting today at
#openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC.
Agenda:
Review action items
Current status (quickly by team members)
POC demo scenario readiness and ways to improve it
TaskFlow integration status
Open discussion
It can also be found at
On 04/06/2014 08:32 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
[...]
There is API documentation:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/database-api/tree/openstack-database-api/src/markdown/database-api-v1.md
We should publish that one on docs.openstack.org
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
Cinder provides backup/restore API for cinder volumes. Will that be used as
part of the higher level VM import/export orchestration, or both are
totally different ? If different, how ?
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Jesse Pretorius
jesse.pretor...@gmail.comwrote:
On 7 April 2014 09:06, Saju
Yes, to ensure availability the same application could be deployed
across multiple availability zones/cells, as these can offer some
level of independence of risk. The use-cases seemed to expect same
network, which may not be achievable given the above, but ideally
should be able to load-balance
Might be of help to you to know that glance-pythonclient provides an
‘image-download’ option.
Also,
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/download-images-and-snapshots
On 07 Apr 2014, at 08:06, Saju M sajup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Amazon provides option to Import/Export VM.
On 04/06/2014 03:22 PM, Vipul Sabhaya wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com
mailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/06/2014 09:02 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Hopper, Justin
justin.hop...@hp.com
Hi Marios, thanks for raising this.
There is in progress blueprint that should address some issues with neutron
ha deployment -
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/l3-high-availability.
Right now neutron-dhcp agent can be configured as active/active.
But l3-agent and metadata-agent
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 11:23:28AM -0700, Steven Dake wrote:
Hi folks,
There are two problems we should address regarding the growth and
change to the HOT specification.
First our +2/+A process for normal changes doesn't totally make
sense for hot_spec.rst. We generally have some
On 04/06/2014 11:27 PM, Steve Baker wrote:
On 05/04/14 04:47, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering if the time has come to document what exactly are we
doing with tripleo-heat-templates and merge.py[1], figure out what needs
to happen to move away and raise the necessary blueprints on
Hi all,
One of the topics of discussion during the TripleO midcycle meetup a few weeks
ago was the direction we'd like to take Tuskar during Juno. Based on the ideas
presented there, we've created a tentative list of items we'd like to address:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:30:50AM +0200, Thomas Spatzier wrote:
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 06/04/2014 22:32
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Managing changes to the Hot
Specification (hot_spec.rst)
On 07/04/14 06:23, Steven
Hi all,
Perhaps, we should file a design session for Neutron-specific questions?
1. Define a neutron node (tripleo-image-elements/disk-image-builder) and
make sure it deploys and scales ok (tripleo-heat-templates/tuskar). This
comes under by lifeless blueprint at
On 07/04/14 06:20, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Sun, 2014-04-06 at 06:59 +, Nandavar, Divakar Padiyar wrote:
Well, it seems to me that the problem is the above blueprint and the code
it introduced. This is an anti-feature IMO, and probably the best solution
would be to remove the above code and
Hello everyone,
Due to various release-critical issues detected in Cinder icehouse RC1,
a new release candidate was just generated. You can find a list of the
10 bugs fixed and a link to the RC2 source tarball at:
https://launchpad.net/cinder/icehouse/icehouse-rc2
Unless new release-critical
Hi Sam,
I find google doc a little bit too heavy for ML discussion.
So I'd like to extract the gist of the overall use case that we want to use
when discussing an API (for ex, single-call API).
Here it is as I see it (Sam, correct me if I'm wrong):
User wants to setup web application that is
@Matt Booth: I think you make a lot of good points, but I think the main gist
of the opposing argument, so to speak,
is that currently, the way we differentiate between potential compute resources
(whether they be an individual
hypervisor or a cluster) is by having each have its own compute
On 22:55 Wed 02 Apr , Mike Perez wrote:
On 02:58 Thu 03 Apr , Bohai (ricky) wrote:
Hi,
When I use an image to create a cinder volume, I found image's metadata is
saved into DB table volume_glance_metadata.
But when I use os-volume_upload_image to create image from cinder
On 06/04/14 23:27, Steve Baker wrote:
On 05/04/14 04:47, Tomas Sedovic wrote:
Hi All,
snip
The maintenance burden of merge.py can be gradually reduced if features
in it can be deleted when they are no longer needed. At some point in
this process merge.py will need to accept HOT templates,
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 10:22:15PM -0400, Michael Elder wrote:
If Keystone is configured with an external identity provider (LDAP,
OpenID, etc), how does the creation of a new user per resource affect that
external identity source?
My understanding is that it should be possible to configure
Hi Vishal,
I’ve restarted my work on the blueprint last week now that Juno is open for
development and OVS 2.1.0 is available, targeting juno-1. My plan is to have a
working implementation available by the summit design discussion to make sure
we cover all our bases. Between the blueprint page
Hi,
We don't currently collect high-level security related information about
the projects for OpenStack releases. Things like the crypto algorithms
that are used or how we handle sensitive data aren't documented anywhere
that I could see. I did some thinking on how we can improve this. I
wrote
Hi Everyone,
The Barbican team is hosting our weekly meeting today, Monday April 7, at
20:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt
Meeting agenda is avaialbe here
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican and everyone is welcomed
to add agenda items
You can check this link
On 04/03/2014 10:19 PM, Peng Wu wrote:
Hi,
Recently I read the Separate translation domain for log messages
blueprint[1], and I found that we can store both English Message Log and
Translated Message Log with some configurations.
I am an i18n Software Engineer, and we are thinking about
Hi Saju,
VM imports are likely to show up in Glance under this blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/new-upload-workflow
Cheers,
markwash
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Saju M sajup...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Amazon provides option to Import/Export VM.
Hello,
I'm working on Murano integration into FUEL-5.0, and have faced the
following problem: our current implementation depends on 'kombu.five'
module, but this module (actually a single file) is available only starting
at kombu 3.0. So this means that murano-api component depends on kombu
=3.0.
We are doing implementing that usecase. My talk is selected at the summit.
Please do visit.
http://openstacksummitmay2014atlanta.sched.org/mobile/#session:c0d9f8aefb90f93cfc8fc66b67b8403d
On 07-Apr-2014 6:37 PM, Mark Washenberger mark.washenber...@markwash.net
wrote:
Hi Saju,
VM imports are
We are implementing that usecase. My talk is selected at the summit. Please
do visit.
http://openstacksummitmay2014atlanta.sched.org/mobile/#session:c0d9f8aefb90f93cfc8fc66b67b8403d
On 07-Apr-2014 6:37 PM, Mark Washenberger mark.washenber...@markwash.net
wrote:
Hi Saju,
VM imports are likely
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Amir Sadoughi
amir.sadou...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi Vishal,
I've restarted my work on the blueprint last week now that Juno is open for
development and OVS 2.1.0 is available, targeting juno-1. My plan is to have
a working implementation available by the
Also, forgot to add, please add an item on this week's ML2 meeting agenda [1]
so we can discuss this during the meeting this week.
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ML2
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Amir Sadoughi
amir.sadou...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi Vishal,
I've restarted my
Hi Sylvain,
There was a similar thread on this recently - which might be worth reviewing:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/031006.html
Some interesting use cases were posted, and a I don't think a conclusion was
reached, which seems to suggest this might be a
Amazing!! :-D
I'll do my best to try to make this a reality, as fast as I can!
We really need to start evaluating Neutron IPv6, even on its simplest
topology (like Flat - provider network with external RA)...
Cheers!
Thiago
On 3 April 2014 16:43, Simon Leinen simon.lei...@switch.ch wrote:
Thanks for joining today’s meeting!
As usually,
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-04-07-16.00.html
Full log:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-04-07-16.00.log.html
Let’s meet next time on April 14th.
Renat Akhmerov
@
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
From my understanding, Trove is due to graduate in the Juno release.
Since I didn't see it called out elsewhere in this thread yet, I'd like to
point out that Trove graduated at the end of the Havana cycle and should be
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly
meeting tomorrow, Tuesday April 8th, at 19:00 UTC in
#openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone
Kyle,
Yes. I plan on getting all 4 existing patches up-to-date over the next 9 days.
I’m not working on upstream 100% of the time so that’s not a hard commitment,
but I think it’s definitely doable.
Amir
On Apr 7, 2014, at 11:42 AM, Kyle Mestery
Doug -
Are the projects going to be responsible for keeping this up to date, or is
the oslo team going to take care of it? We could reject a change to add a
new oslo library dependency if the test isn't there. If there was a process
that you followed to generate the dependencies, maybe this could
Simon, please use the operators list or general list for questions such as this
in the future.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Mailing_Lists#General_List
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original Message -
From: Xu (Simon) Chen xche...@gmail.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent:
Hi Folks,
Generally the scheduler's capabilities that are exposed via hints can be
enabled or disabled in a Nova install by choosing the set of filters that are
configured. However the server group feature doesn't fit that pattern -
even if the affinity filter isn't configured the
Hi folks,
I've been looking at how deploying Neutron Server (on Icehouse release)
and I can see we have now to provide the admin tenant ID in neutron.conf
to be able to send notifications to Nova about port updates [1] thru
Nova API.
Working on configuration management for a while, it's a tough
On 06/04/14 14:23, Steven Dake wrote:
Hi folks,
There are two problems we should address regarding the growth and change
to the HOT specification.
First our +2/+A process for normal changes doesn't totally make sense
for hot_spec.rst. We generally have some informal bar for controversial
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Brant Knudson b...@acm.org wrote:
Doug -
Are the projects going to be responsible for keeping this up to date, or is
the oslo team going to take care of it?
Some of each. Adding the test jobs will be part of the work the
liaison from a project does when
To make the OpenStack APIs easily accessible via PHP, the most popular
server side language of the web, we've been working on a PHP SDK in
Stackforge.
This week we are going to have our first IRC meeting on Wednesday. If
you're interested in a PHP SDK please come join in the discussion.
More
Hi Thomas!
It will be a honor for me to join Debian OpenStack packaging team! I'm in!!
:-D
Listen, that neutron-ipv6.patch I have, doesn't apply against
neutron-2014.1.rc1, here is it:
neutron-ipv6.patch: http://paste.openstack.org/show/74857/
I generated it from the commands that Xuhan
I am currently working on a patch that allows upstream RAs and SLAAC
configuration. Currently testing it in devstack - it's based on chunks
of patchset 33 of this review that were skipped when Mark McClain
committed patchset 34.
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/56184/
Xu Han and Dazhao - do I
On Apr 4, 2014, at 1:56 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 19/02/14 02:48, Clint Byrum wrote:
Since picking up Heat and trying to think about how to express clusters
of things, I've been troubled by how poorly the CFN language supports
using lists. There has always been the
On 04/07/2014 02:12 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 04/07/2014 01:43 PM, Day, Phil wrote:
Generally the scheduler’s capabilities that are exposed via hints can be
enabled or disabled in a Nova install by choosing the set of filters
that are configured. However the server group feature doesn’t
On 04/07/2014 11:01 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 06/04/14 14:23, Steven Dake wrote:
Hi folks,
There are two problems we should address regarding the growth and change
to the HOT specification.
First our +2/+A process for normal changes doesn't totally make sense
for hot_spec.rst. We generally
Solly,
My point is that this feature (creating a VM for a tenant as an admin in
another project) might not be possible given the current implementation.
I've pointed out two places in nova code, from which I drew my conclusion.
Since this potentially requires a code change, I think the dev
Awesome! I have a perfect lab to evaluate it...:-)
Just a curiosity, it will work with ML2 and Flat Network (dual-stacked with
IPv4)? I would like to try to fit this into a running lab environment, if
possible...
I mean, currently, I have a lab with Flat Network topology (Havana without
I dealt with this myself the other day and it was a huge pain. That said,
changing all the packages seems like a nuclear option. Is there any way
we could change python that would make it smarter about searching multiple
locations for namespace packages?
Vish
On Apr 7, 2014, at 12:24 PM, Doug
Hi Martin,
I previously posted to the mailing list with some information about our
IPv6 lab environment and devstack setup.
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-February/026589.html
Keep in mind that code differs from what was eventually merged in
upstream, so I would ask
Okay Collins! Got it... I remember that e-mail from Feb...
I understand it, no rush... ^_^
Chat tomorrow, tks!
On 7 April 2014 17:35, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.comwrote:
Hi Martin,
I previously posted to the mailing list with some information about our
IPv6 lab environment
I'm writing the ML2 configuration sections for the installation guide and
found a potential location conflict for the 'enable_security_group' key in
ml2_conf.ini. In the patch associated with this feature, the example
configuration file has this key under [security_group].
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 16:48 +, Day, Phil wrote:
Hi Sylvain,
There was a similar thread on this recently – which might be worth
reviewing:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/031006.html
Some interesting use cases were posted, and a I don’t think a
Hi,
I've added a section for tomorrow's agenda, please do add topics that
you'd like to discuss.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_April_8th
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Hi Phil,
2014-04-07 18:48 GMT+02:00 Day, Phil philip@hp.com:
Hi Sylvain,
There was a similar thread on this recently - which might be worth
reviewing:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/031006.html
Some interesting use cases were posted, and a I don't
hi erveryone,thats a python code:
from ceilometerclient.v2 import client
ceilometer =client.Client(endpoint='http://controller:8777/v2/resources',
token='e8e70342225d64d1d20a')
print ceilometer.resources.list(q)
whats this q parameter??
Sincerly ,
Chraiti Hachem,software engineer
Tim Bell writes:
From my understanding, Trove is due to graduate in the Juno release.
Is documentation for developers, operators and users not one of the
criteria
(http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/incubation-integration-requirements)
?
Hi Tim:
Just to
Based on some off-list chatter with Michael, Tom and others, I went ahead
and submitted a proposal for a nova session -
http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/245 - and used Tom's wording from
those submitted to other products. This will hold a place while the Nova
PTL election finishes and
Hi Matt,
Thanks for raising this. Both should be the same section.
[securitygroup] section exists in Havana and previous releases and
it is the right section name.
When we introduced enable_security_group option, we seem to have added
a new section
accidentally. We don't intended to introduce a
On 3 April 2014 08:21, Khanh-Toan Tran khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.comwrote:
Otherwise we cannot provide redundancy to client except using Region which
is dedicated infrastructure and networked separated and anti-affinity
filter which IMO is not pragmatic as it has tendency of abusive usage.
Hi!
I faced this problem this weekend, look:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303517
Currently, my ml2_conf.ini contains:
---
[security_group]
enable_security_group = True
[securitygroup]
firewall_driver =
neutron.agent.linux.iptables_firewall.OVSHybridIptablesFirewallDriver
---
Best!
Thiago
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-day
rule to the 3 month review stats, my suggestion would be a
- Original Message -
From: Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Monday, April 7, 2014 4:00:30 PM
Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] config options, defaults, oh my!
So one interesting thing from the
Tomorrow is a scheduled python-openstacksdk meeting, although at least
myself and Alex Gaynor will not be available as we're in transit to
PyCon. I didn't hear from any others that they couldn't make the
meeting, so I'm guessing it will go on, just with someone else leading
it.
As Ed Leafe's
+1 for the -core changes
On 04/08/2014 01:50 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose:
bnemec
greghaynes
jdon
On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote:
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should retroactively
Thiago,
My current ml2_conf.ini looks like your example. My environment also
continues to work if I omit the entire [security_group] section. However,
it stops working if I omit the [securitygroup] section.
Matt
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Martinx - ジェームズ
thiagocmarti...@gmail.comwrote:
The Neutron API is a constant cause of pain for us as Heat developers,
but afaik we've never attempted to bring up the issues we have found in
a cross-project forum. I've recently been doing some more investigation
and I want to document the exact ways in which the current Neutron API
breaks
The ODL CI is broken at the moment due to an upstream ODL bug around
the addition of some IPV6 parameters into the subnet create API on the
Neutron side. See the thread in the ODL lists here [1]. This is
actually a bug in the MoXy JsonProvider which ODL uses. A workaround
exists here [2], which
Hi,
I know I'm not the only person who had this problem so here's two simple
steps to get the lines and line numbers aligned.
1. Install the stylebot extension
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/oiaejidbmkiecgbjeifoejpgmdaleoha
2. Click on the download icon to install the custom style
Hi Steve,
Thank you -- this clarifies things quite a bit.
I'd like to join that discussion at the summit if possible.
-M
Kind Regards,
Michael D. Elder
STSM | Master Inventor
mdel...@us.ibm.com | linkedin.com/in/mdelder
Success is not delivering a
I will just provide a few quick points of clarity.
Instinctively, I want a Subnet to be something like a virtual VLAN
That's what a network is. The network is the broadcast domain. That's why
you attach ports to the network. The subnet is just blocks of IP addresses
to use on this network. If
Hi Zane
Thank you for your very valuable post.
We should convert your suggest to multiple bps.
2014-04-07 17:28 GMT-07:00 Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com:
The Neutron API is a constant cause of pain for us as Heat developers, but
afaik we've never attempted to bring up the issues we have found
1) Scheduler forklift efforts
2) Atlanta summit scheduler sessions
3) Opens
Topic vault (so we don't forget)
1 - no-db scheduler
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
Ph: 303/443-3786
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
Hi,
We’ve found a couple of bugs in glance RC. They both have simple fixes that fix
some major features, I’m wondering if some glance experts can cast their eye on
them and if they qualify for icehouse.
glance registry v2 doesn't work (This has got some attention already, thanks)
In case it isn't clear to others, or in case I've misunderstood, I'd like
to start by rephrasing the problem statement.
* It is possible to use Ironic to deploy an instance of ironic-conductor on
bare metal, which joins the same cluster that deployed it.
* This, or some other event, could cause
Thanks for the comments.
Maybe we could just search the English log. :-)
But I just find it is hard to meet all requirements of log message id,
Just some thought that we can avoid the message id generation by using
the English log.
For debug purpose, we can just read the English log.
Regards,
89 matches
Mail list logo
