Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread mar...@redhat.com
On 10/04/14 20:55, Jay Dobies wrote: On 04/10/2014 01:40 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote: Hi Jarda Congratulations This release and the demo is super awesome!! Do you have any instruction to install this one? I'd like to see this too. I asked a few times and never got an answer on whether or not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

2014-04-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/08/2014 03:10 AM, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: Hi Thomas! It will be a honor for me to join Debian OpenStack packaging team! I'm in!! :-D Listen, that neutron-ipv6.patch I have, doesn't apply against neutron-2014.1.rc1, here is it: neutron-ipv6.patch:

[openstack-dev] TripleO fully uploaded to Debian Experimental

2014-04-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, it's with a great joy that I can announce today, that TripleO is now fully in Debian [1]. It is currently only uploaded to Debian experimental, like for all Icehouse (I don't think I can upload to normal Sid until Icehouse is released). Feedback (and bug reports to the Debian BTS) would be

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Ladislav Smola
Hello, we have used this list of steps for the demo on Fedora 20: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tuskar/Devtest The demo is running on one machine with 24GB RAM and 120GB disk. We are using virtualized baremetals(bm_poseur) for development. KInd Regards, Ladislav On 04/10/2014 07:40 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] using transport_url disables connection pooling?

2014-04-11 Thread Mehdi Abaakouk
Hi, Le 2014-04-10 22:02, Gordon Sim a écrit : If you use the transport_url config option (or pass a url directly to get_transport()), then the amqp connection pooling appears to be disabled[1]. That means a new connection is created for every request send as well as for every response. So I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread mar...@redhat.com
On 11/04/14 10:35, Ladislav Smola wrote: Hello, we have used this list of steps for the demo on Fedora 20: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Tuskar/Devtest nice! The demo is running on one machine with 24GB RAM and 120GB disk. We are using virtualized baremetals(bm_poseur) for

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/04 19:40, Nachi Ueno wrote: Hi Jarda Congratulations This release and the demo is super awesome!! Do you have any instruction to install this one? Thank you, Nachi! look at Ladislav's response he posted our guideline for installation. If you have any problems, let us know on

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/04 19:40, Nachi Ueno wrote: Hi Jarda Congratulations This release and the demo is super awesome!! Do you have any instruction to install this one? Thank you, Nachi! look at Ladislav's response he posted our guideline for installation. If you have any problems, let us know on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Demo of current state of Tuskar-UI

2014-04-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/10/04 22:55, Robert Collins wrote: On 10 April 2014 01:54, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote: Hello OpenStackers, I would like to share with you non-narrated demo of current version of 'Tuskar-UI' project, which is very close to Icehouse release (one or two more patches to come

[openstack-dev] [fuel-dev][Fuel] VXLAN tunnels support

2014-04-11 Thread Oleg Balakirev
Hello, We have implemented support for VXLAN tunnels. Please review. Blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/neutron-vxlan-support Review requests: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86611/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83767/ -- ___ Best Regards Oleg Balakirev

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] config options, defaults, oh my!

2014-04-11 Thread Alexis Lee
Clint Byrum said on Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:45:17AM -0700: Now you've described it, you're right, I'm not interested in TripleO or TripleO milestones. I am interested in using os-*-config, Heat and tripleo-image-elements to produce pure OpenStack deployments from 3 to 3000 nodes, for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][Neutron] Networking Discussions last week

2014-04-11 Thread Przemyslaw Grygiel
On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Andrey Danin ada...@mirantis.com wrote: On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 4:22 AM, Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com wrote: Looks like it falls into two parts: Fuel Neutron requirements. Use case, as far as I understand, is following: user doesn't have one

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Consolidating efforts around Fedora/Centos gate job

2014-04-11 Thread Sean Dague
On 04/11/2014 01:43 AM, Ian Wienand wrote: Hi, To summarize recent discussions, nobody is opposed in general to having Fedora / Centos included in the gate. However, it raises a number of big questions : which job(s) to run on Fedora, where does the quota for extra jobs come from, how do

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
On 2014/11/04 10:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Dear Stackers, I am happy to announce that yesterday Tuskar UI (TripleO UI) has tagged branch 0.1.0 for Icehouse release [0]. I put together a narrated demo of all included features [1]. You can find one

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][heat] Unusable error messages in dashboard for Orchestration

2014-04-11 Thread Steven Hardy
Hi Tom, On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 01:05:00PM +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi, Lodged a bug the day after Havana came out to hope to get this usability problem addressed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1241395 Essentially, if something goes wrong creating a stack through the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/11/2014 06:05 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: On 2014/11/04 10:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Dear Stackers, I am happy to announce that yesterday Tuskar UI (TripleO UI) has tagged branch 0.1.0 for Icehouse release [0]. I put together a narrated

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][TripleO] ubuntu deploy-ironic element ramdisk does not detect sata disks

2014-04-11 Thread Rohan Kanade
I am using Ironic's out of tree Nova driver and running Ironic + PXESeamicro driver. I am using a ubuntu based deployment ramdisk created using below cmd in diskimage-builder. sudo bin/ramdisk-image-create -a amd64 ubuntu deploy-ironic -o /tmp/deploy-ramdisk I can see that the ramdisk is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Problem with kombu version.

2014-04-11 Thread Dmitry Pyzhov
We are going to move to kombu==2.5.14 today. Right now we have 2.1.8. 2.5.14 meets global-requirements.txt, and 3.0 does not. Because =3.0 is much more strict requirement then =2.4.8. We can try to migrate to kombu 3.0, but looks like we have no resources for this in 5.0. It needs to be fully

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Ladislav Smola
On 04/11/2014 01:03 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 04/11/2014 06:05 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: On 2014/11/04 10:27, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 04/10/2014 04:32 PM, Jaromir Coufal wrote: Dear Stackers, I am happy to announce that yesterday Tuskar UI (TripleO UI) has tagged branch 0.1.0 for

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Brocade NICs support

2014-04-11 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Folks, does our boostrap discovery image still can't see Brocade NICs? Do we have anyone to try it out? https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1260492 this bug can't be resolved unless we have hardware to test a fix for it? Fix was proposed when bootstrap was on CentOS 6.4, and now we have CentOS

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] XXXFSDriver: Query on usage of load_shares_config in ensure_shares_mounted

2014-04-11 Thread Deepak Shetty
Hi, I am using the nfs and glusterfs driver as reference here. I see that load_shares_config is called everytime via _ensure_shares_mounted which I feel is incorrect mainly because ensure_shares_mounted loads the config file again w/o restarting the service I think that the shares config file

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Regarding manage_existing and unmanage

2014-04-11 Thread Deepak Shetty
My argument was mostly from the perspective that unmanage shud do its best to revert back the volume to its original state (mainly the name). Like you said, once its given to cinder, its not a external volume anymore similary, once its taken out of cinder, its a external volume and its just

[openstack-dev] PTL Election Conclusion and Results

2014-04-11 Thread Anita Kuno
Thank you to the electorate, to all those who voted and to all candidates who put their name forward for PTL for this election. A healthy, open process breeds trust in our decision making capability - thank you to all those who make this process possible. Now for the results of the PTL election

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra]Requesting consideration of httmock package for test-requirements in Juno

2014-04-11 Thread Paul Michali (pcm)
See inline @PCM… On Apr 9, 2014, at 5:56 PM, Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.commailto:jamielen...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.commailto:p...@cisco.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] [Horizon] Icehouse Release of TripleO UI + Demo

2014-04-11 Thread Jaromir Coufal
Hi Jarda, Thanks a lot for your reply. Unfortunately, these instructions aren't very useful if you want to do an installation based on packages. Something like: git clone https://git.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-incubator $TRIPLEO_ROOT/tripleo-incubator/scripts/devtest.sh --trash-my-machine

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Regarding manage_existing and unmanage

2014-04-11 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 11 April 2014 14:21, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: My argument was mostly from the perspective that unmanage shud do its best to revert back the volume to its original state (mainly the name). Like you said, once its given to cinder, its not a external volume anymore similary,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] XXXFSDriver: Query on usage of load_shares_config in ensure_shares_mounted

2014-04-11 Thread Kerr, Andrew
Hi Deepak, I know that there are plans to completely change how NFS uses (or more accurately, will not use) the shares.conf file in the future. My guess is that a lot of this code will be changed in the near future during that rework. Andrew Kerr OpenStack QA Cloud Solutions Group NetApp

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] XXXFSDriver: Query on usage of load_shares_config in ensure_shares_mounted

2014-04-11 Thread Duncan Thomas
Hi Deepak Both of those (config being read repeatedly, and config not being applied if the share is already mounted) sound like bugs. Please file bug reports for both, with reproducers if possible. Thanks On 11 April 2014 12:54, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am using the

[openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, I've been taking a look at devstack support for nova-docker[1] which was recently taken out of nova. I stumbled across a similar effort currently underway[2], so have based my work off that. What I hope to do is setup a check doing CI on devstack-f20 nodes[3], this will setup a

[openstack-dev] Candidate proposals for TC (Technical Committee) positions are now open

2014-04-11 Thread Anita Kuno
Candidate proposals for the Technical Committee positions (7 positions) are now open and will remain open until 05:59 utc April 18, 2014. Candidates for the Technical Committee Positions: Any Foundation individual member can propose their candidacy for an available, directly-elected TC seat. [0]

[openstack-dev] Vagrant Devstack projects - time to consolidate?

2014-04-11 Thread Collins, Sean
Hi, I've noticed a proliferation of Vagrant projects that are popping up, is there any interest from other authors in trying to consolidate? https://github.com/bcwaldon/vagrant_devstack https://github.com/sdague/devstack-vagrant

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling

2014-04-11 Thread Andrew Laski
On 04/10/14 at 11:33pm, Oleg Gelbukh wrote: Andrew, Thank you for clarification! On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.comwrote: The scheduler as it currently exists is a placement engine. There is sufficient complexity in the scheduler with just that

Re: [openstack-dev] Vagrant Devstack projects - time to consolidate?

2014-04-11 Thread Sean Dague
On 04/11/2014 10:34 AM, Collins, Sean wrote: Hi, I've noticed a proliferation of Vagrant projects that are popping up, is there any interest from other authors in trying to consolidate? https://github.com/bcwaldon/vagrant_devstack https://github.com/sdague/devstack-vagrant

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Russell Bryant
On 04/11/2014 10:11 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, I've been taking a look at devstack support for nova-docker[1] which was recently taken out of nova. I stumbled across a similar effort currently underway[2], so have based my work off that. What I hope to do is setup a check doing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

2014-04-11 Thread Collins, Sean
Many of those patches are stale - please join us in the subteam IRC meeting if you wish to coordinate development of IPv6 features, so that we can focus on updating them and getting them merged. At this point simply applying them to the Icehouse tree is not enough. -- Sean M. Collins

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] XXXFSDriver: Query on usage of load_shares_config in ensure_shares_mounted

2014-04-11 Thread Eric Harney
On 04/11/2014 07:54 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: Hi, I am using the nfs and glusterfs driver as reference here. I see that load_shares_config is called everytime via _ensure_shares_mounted which I feel is incorrect mainly because ensure_shares_mounted loads the config file again w/o

[openstack-dev] more oslo liaisons needed

2014-04-11 Thread Doug Hellmann
I see that several projects have their Oslo liaisons lined up (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/ProjectLiaisons). It would be great if we had at least one volunteer from each project before the summit, so we can get a head start on the coordination work. Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Consolidating efforts around Fedora/Centos gate job

2014-04-11 Thread Derek Higgins
On 11/04/14 06:43, Ian Wienand wrote: Hi, To summarize recent discussions, nobody is opposed in general to having Fedora / Centos included in the gate. However, it raises a number of big questions : which job(s) to run on Fedora, where does the quota for extra jobs come from, how do we get

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Group logging

2014-04-11 Thread Jay Pipes
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 00:02 +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote: Auditing has been discussed for the firewall extension. However, it is reasonable to expect some form of auditing for security group rules as well. To the best of my knowledge there has never been an explicit decision to not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Group logging

2014-04-11 Thread Veiga, Anthony
On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 00:02 +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote: Auditing has been discussed for the firewall extension. However, it is reasonable to expect some form of auditing for security group rules as well. To the best of my knowledge there has never been an explicit decision to not

Re: [openstack-dev] Vagrant Devstack projects - time to consolidate?

2014-04-11 Thread Collins, Sean
Maybe it would be good to get an ad-hoc IRC meeting together to figure out what the must have features are that inspired everyone to write these. If we can come up with a way to overlap those all sanely, moving to stackforge and doing this via gerrit would be something I'd be into.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][heat] Unusable error messages in dashboard for Orchestration

2014-04-11 Thread Fox, Kevin M
I've seen unusable error messages out of heat as well. I've been telling users (our ops guys) to look at the heat-engine logs when it happens and usually its fairly apparent what is wrong with their templates. In the future, Should I report each of these I see as a new bug or add each to the

Re: [openstack-dev] more oslo liaisons needed

2014-04-11 Thread Thomas Herve
I see that several projects have their Oslo liaisons lined up (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/ProjectLiaisons). It would be great if we had at least one volunteer from each project before the summit, so we can get a head start on the coordination work. Hi Doug, I'd be happy to handle

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] XXXFSDriver: Query on usage of load_shares_config in ensure_shares_mounted

2014-04-11 Thread Eric Harney
On 04/11/2014 10:55 AM, Eric Harney wrote: On 04/11/2014 07:54 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: Hi, I am using the nfs and glusterfs driver as reference here. I see that load_shares_config is called everytime via _ensure_shares_mounted which I feel is incorrect mainly because

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Paul Czarkowski
I would rather see the devstack support be integrated in devstack's repo itself. There's a review Outstanding for devstack[1] that adds this support in and also adds in some pieces to make it easier to utilize external nova drivers. If that fails out then I'm all for merging in your review to

Re: [openstack-dev] Vagrant Devstack projects - time to consolidate?

2014-04-11 Thread Anne Gentle
I'd love to see consolidation as I've tried to keep up nova dev docs for example, and with all the options it's tough to test and maintain one for docs. Go for it. On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: Hi, I've noticed a proliferation of

Re: [openstack-dev] Vagrant Devstack projects - time to consolidate?

2014-04-11 Thread Greg Lucas
Sean Dague wrote: Maybe it would be good to get an ad-hoc IRC meeting together to figure out what the must have features are that inspired everyone to write these. If we can come up with a way to overlap those all sanely, moving to stackforge and doing this via gerrit would be something I'd be

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Russell Bryant
On 04/11/2014 11:28 AM, Paul Czarkowski wrote: I would rather see the devstack support be integrated in devstack's repo itself. There's a review Outstanding for devstack[1] that adds this support in and also adds in some pieces to make it easier to utilize external nova drivers. If

[openstack-dev] [Climate] Meeting minutes

2014-04-11 Thread Dina Belova
Hello, folks! Our Climate meeting minutes are here :) Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2014/climate.2014-04-11-15.00.html Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/climate/2014/climate.2014-04-11-15.00.txt Log:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Agent]

2014-04-11 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Maybe an Intel AMT driver too: http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/intel-active-management-technology.html You could use desktop class machines with ironic then. Kevin From: Devananda van der Veen [devananda@gmail.com] Sent:

Re: [openstack-dev] TripleO fully uploaded to Debian Experimental

2014-04-11 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Thomas Great! Do we have a doc how to use these packages? 2014-04-11 0:00 GMT-07:00 Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org: Hi, it's with a great joy that I can announce today, that TripleO is now fully in Debian [1]. It is currently only uploaded to Debian experimental, like for all Icehouse

Re: [openstack-dev] more oslo liaisons needed

2014-04-11 Thread Doug Hellmann
Thanks, Thomas! If you're on IRC, you can join us in #openstack-oslo. On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.com wrote: I see that several projects have their Oslo liaisons lined up (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/ProjectLiaisons). It would be great if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Derek Higgins
On 11/04/14 16:28, Paul Czarkowski wrote: I would rather see the devstack support be integrated in devstack's repo itself. There's a review Outstanding for devstack[1] that adds this support in and also adds in some pieces to make it easier to utilize external nova drivers. Great, I hadn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Climate] Meeting minutes

2014-04-11 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi Dina et al. I'm sorry, I was facing this week a particular off-load due to various concerns, and so was unable to attend the meeting. About the wondering of my participation, please all be sure I'll still dedicate some of my time to Climate, including some BPs and bugs, so yes I will handle

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] [taskflow] Mistral TaskFlow integration summary

2014-04-11 Thread Joshua Harlow
Thanks for the write-up krill. Also some adjustments, Both points are good, and putting some of this on @ https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/taskflow-mistral-details so that we can have it actively noted (feel free to adjust it). I think ivan is working on some docs/code/… for the lazy engine

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift] Enterprise Deployment

2014-04-11 Thread Ben Nemec
This sounds like a question for either the users list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack or the operators list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators Thanks. -Ben On 04/10/2014 09:07 PM, Sumit Gaur wrote: Hi I understand that

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling

2014-04-11 Thread Henrique Truta
Is there anyone currently working on Neat/Gantt projects? I'd like to contribute to them, as well. 2014-04-11 11:37 GMT-03:00 Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.com: On 04/10/14 at 11:33pm, Oleg Gelbukh wrote: Andrew, Thank you for clarification! On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Andrew

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling

2014-04-11 Thread Tim Bell
-Original Message- From: Andrew Laski [mailto:andrew.la...@rackspace.com] Sent: 11 April 2014 16:38 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Dynamic scheduling On 04/10/14 at 11:33pm, Oleg Gelbukh wrote: Andrew, ...

[openstack-dev] [Mistral][TaskFlow] Mistral-TaskFlow Summary

2014-04-11 Thread Dmitri Zimine
We prototyped Mistral / TaskFlow integration and have a follow-up discussions. SUMMARY: Mistral (Workflow Service) can embed TaskFlow as a workflow library, with some required modifications to function resliently as a service, and for smooth integration. However, the TaskFlow flow controls are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral][TaskFlow] Mistral-TaskFlow Summary

2014-04-11 Thread Joshua Harlow
I'm confused, why is this 2 emails?? http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-April/032461.html Seems better to just have 1 chain, not 2. From: Dmitri Zimine d...@stackstorm.commailto:d...@stackstorm.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Multiprovider API documentation

2014-04-11 Thread Robert Kukura
On 4/10/14, 6:35 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: The bug for documenting the 'multi-provider' API extension is still open [1]. The bug report has a good deal of information, but perhaps it might be worth also documenting how ML2 uses the segment information, as this might be useful to understand

Re: [openstack-dev] Vagrant Devstack projects - time to consolidate?

2014-04-11 Thread Sean Dague
On 04/11/2014 11:38 AM, Greg Lucas wrote: Sean Dague wrote: Maybe it would be good to get an ad-hoc IRC meeting together to figure out what the must have features are that inspired everyone to write these. If we can come up with a way to overlap those all sanely, moving to stackforge and

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Sean Dague
On 04/11/2014 11:50 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 11/04/14 16:28, Paul Czarkowski wrote: I would rather see the devstack support be integrated in devstack's repo itself. There's a review Outstanding for devstack[1] that adds this support in and also adds in some pieces to make it easier to

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Consolidating efforts around Fedora/Centos gate job

2014-04-11 Thread James E. Blair
Ian Wienand iwien...@redhat.com writes: Then we have the question of the nodepool setup scripts working on F20. I just tested the setup scripts from [3] and it all seems to work on a fresh f20 cloud image. I think this is due to kchamart, peila2 and others who've fixed parts of this before.

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Paul Czarkowski
Based on this feedback I have removed the docker portions of the review to devstack But have kept in the changes that make it easier for a nova drivers to add their own Files to the nova rootwrap.d directory. On 4/11/14 10:47 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/11/2014 11:28 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo-heat-templates migration to software-config: please rebase on top

2014-04-11 Thread Clint Byrum
Another massive change just landed in front of 81666. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84197/ So let me make my statement below a bit more clear: Please do not land changes until this is fixed and merged. Every time I have to merge in the new changes is a few hours to a whole day of work. If we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Load balancing use cases and web ui screen captures

2014-04-11 Thread Jorge Miramontes
Hi Kevin, We are trying to prioritize features based on actual data utilization. If you have some, by all means please add it to https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ar1FuMFYRhgadDVXZ25NM2NfbGtLTkR0TDFNUWJQUWc#gid=0. One reason we are focusing on HTTP(S) and not FTP is that 0.27% of

Re: [openstack-dev] Vagrant Devstack projects - time to consolidate?

2014-04-11 Thread Collins, Sean
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:24:10PM EDT, Sean Dague wrote: Honestly, multi provisioner support is something I think shouldn't be done. Agreed - in addition let's keep this in perspective - we're just adding a little bit of glue to prep the VM for the running of DevStack, which does the heavy

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Eric Windisch
What I hope to do is setup a check doing CI on devstack-f20 nodes[3], this will setup a devstack based nova with the nova-docker driver and can then run what ever tests make sense (currently only a minimal test, Eric I believe you were looking at tempest support maybe it could be hooked in

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Russell Bryant
On 04/11/2014 04:29 PM, Eric Windisch wrote: What I hope to do is setup a check doing CI on devstack-f20 nodes[3], this will setup a devstack based nova with the nova-docker driver and can then run what ever tests make sense (currently only a minimal test, Eric I believe you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Load balancing use cases and web ui screen captures

2014-04-11 Thread Adam Harwell
Most everything non-http(s) related can simply be load-balanced under the generic umbrella of UDP or TCP protocol. MySQL often gets it's own special protocol (Libra has MySQL/Galera), but of what you listed, SSH is the only real special case I can think of, wherein something more specialized

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Sean Dague
On 04/11/2014 04:39 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 04/11/2014 04:29 PM, Eric Windisch wrote: What I hope to do is setup a check doing CI on devstack-f20 nodes[3], this will setup a devstack based nova with the nova-docker driver and can then run what ever tests make sense (currently

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Russell Bryant
On 04/11/2014 04:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 04/11/2014 04:39 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 04/11/2014 04:29 PM, Eric Windisch wrote: What I hope to do is setup a check doing CI on devstack-f20 nodes[3], this will setup a devstack based nova with the nova-docker driver and can then run what

[openstack-dev] [fuel] oddness with sqlalchemy db().refresh(object)

2014-04-11 Thread Andrew Woodward
Recently in one of my changes [1] I was fighting with one of the unit tests showing a failure for a test which should have been outside the sphere of influence. Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/andreww/.virtualenvs/fuel/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mock.py, line 1190, in

Re: [openstack-dev] TripleO fully uploaded to Debian Experimental

2014-04-11 Thread Chris Jones
Hi On 11 April 2014 08:00, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: it's with a great joy that I can announce today, that TripleO is now fully in Debian [1]. It is currently only uploaded to Debian woo! Thanks very much Thomas :) -- Cheers, Chris

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Multiprovider API documentation

2014-04-11 Thread Salvatore Orlando
On 11 April 2014 19:11, Robert Kukura kuk...@noironetworks.com wrote: On 4/10/14, 6:35 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote: The bug for documenting the 'multi-provider' API extension is still open [1]. The bug report has a good deal of information, but perhaps it might be worth also documenting

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Michael Still
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/11/2014 04:58 PM, Sean Dague wrote: [snip] If we think it's staying in 3rd party, people are free to use whatever they would like. I guess we should be clear on this point. I *really* think the best way

[openstack-dev] [NOVA][Neutron][ML2][Tunnel] Error in nova-agent when launching VM in compute for Tunnel cases

2014-04-11 Thread Padmanabhan Krishnan
Hello, I have two Openstack nodes (controller Compute and a Compute). VM's are getting launched fine on the node that also acts as the controller. But, the VM's that are scheduled on the compute node seems to go to error state. I am running Icehouse Master version and my ML2 type driver is GRE

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

2014-04-11 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/11/2014 10:52 PM, Collins, Sean wrote: Many of those patches are stale - please join us in the subteam IRC meeting if you wish to coordinate development of IPv6 features, so that we can focus on updating them and getting them merged. At this point simply applying them to the Icehouse

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

2014-04-11 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Hey Thomas! That's an amazing list! :-D Okay, I'll drop by on IRC anytime soon to chat with you guys, tk for the invite! About DHCPv6 support, yes, I agree with you, it can be postponed (in fact, I don't think I'll ever use it). Radvd should be enough for me. I think that we need to start

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

2014-04-11 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Hey guys! My OpenStack Instance have IPv6 connectivity! Using ML2 / Simple Flat Network... For the first time ever! Look: --- administrative@controller:~$ nova boot --image 70f335e3-798b-4031-9773-a640970a8bdf --key-name Key trusty-1 administrative@controller:~$ ssh -i ~/test.pem

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Eric Windisch
Any disagreements with that goal? No disagreement at all. Not that we're talking yet about moving the driver back into Nova, I'd like to take this opportunity to remind anyone interesting in contributing a Cinder driver that it would be a lot easier if they do it while the driver is still in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

2014-04-11 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
In fact, neutron accepted the following command: --- root@controller:~# neutron subnet-create --ip-version 6 --disable-dhcp --tenant-id 5e0106fa81104c5cbe21e1ccc9eb1a36 sharednet1 2001:1291:2bf:fffb::/64 Created a new subnet:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [IPv6] Ubuntu PPA with IPv6 enabled, need help to achieve it

2014-04-11 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Cool! Instance shows an IPv6 address and it clearly isn't generated by EUI-64 (SLAAC) but, at least, I can use static IPv6! YAY! --- root@controller:~# nova list