[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API meeting

2014-04-17 Thread Kenichi Oomichi
Hi, Chris has some days off now. I'd like to run the next meeting instead. Just a reminder that the weekly Nova API meeting is being held tomorrow Friday UTC . We encourage cloud operators and those who use the REST API such as SDK developers and others who and are interested in the future

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-17 Thread Aaron Rosen
Sorry not really. It's still not clear to me why multiple nics would be required on the same L2 domain. Would you mind drawing your use case here: http://asciiflow.com/ (or maybe google docs) labeling the different interfaces with ips and the flow of packets you want. Also perhaps their header

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-17 Thread Aaron Rosen
Hi Kevin, You'd would just create ports that aren't attached to instances and steal their ip_addresses from those ports and put those in the allowed-address-pairs on a port OR you could change the allocation range on the subnet to ensure these ips were never handed out. That's probably the right

[openstack-dev] [Heat][Nova][Neutron]Detach interface will delete the port

2014-04-17 Thread Huangtianhua
Hi all, Port is a resource define in Heat. And heat support the actions: create a port/delete a port/attach to a server/detach from a server. But we can't re-attach a port which once be detached.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-17 Thread Kevin Benton
This seems painful for a tenant workflow to get multiple addresses. I would like to improve this during the Juno cycle. What is the limitation that is blocking the multi-nic use cases? Is it Nova? On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Kevin, You'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-17 Thread Aaron Rosen
Nova currently is preventing one from attaching multiple nics on the same L2. That said I don't think we've clearly determined a use case for having multiple nics on the same L2. One reason why we don't allow this is doing so would allow a tenant to easily loop the network and cause a bcast storm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Nova][Neutron]Detach interface will delete the port

2014-04-17 Thread Sergey Kraynev
Hello Huang. You are right, that this problem is presented in networks update for OS::Nova::Server. I have known about it, and I wanted to discuss it with Steve Baker, but possibly forgot to do it. Thank you, that you raise this thread. About issue. The cause why it happens is simple: when nova

[openstack-dev] [sahara] team meeting April 17 1800 UTC

2014-04-17 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hi folks, We'll be having the Sahara team meeting as usual in #openstack-meeting-alt channel. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SaharaAgenda#Agenda_for_April.2C_17 http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Sahara+Meetingiso=20140417T18 -- Sincerely yours, Sergey

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Keystone LDAP check job

2014-04-17 Thread Sergey Nikitin
Hi, I'm refactoring LDAP driver in Keystone. I have a question: why do we have no gate job, checking keystone with LDAP? Are there any reasons not to create the job? If there aren't I'd like to work on it. Thanks Sergey Nikitin ___ OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [heat-templates] [qa] [tempest] Questions about images

2014-04-17 Thread Thomas Spatzier
From: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 17/04/2014 00:55 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] [heat-templates] [qa] [tempest] Questions about images On 17/04/14 09:11, Thomas Spatzier wrote: From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] API list operations are not fast as they could because they're dumb

2014-04-17 Thread Salvatore Orlando
On 17 April 2014 04:02, Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Comments inline: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote: I have been recently investigating reports of slowness for list responses in the Neutron API. This was first reported in [1],

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Stack snapshots

2014-04-17 Thread Steven Hardy
Hi Thomas, On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 01:16:50PM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote: Hi all, I started working on the stack snapshot blueprint [1] and wrote a first series of patches [2] to get a feeling of what's possible. I have a couple of related design questions though: * Is a stack snapshot

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Release notes for Icehouse

2014-04-17 Thread Fei Long Wang
Hi Tom, Thanks for the reminder. I'm not sure if there is anyone from Glance team working this. But I would like to highlight this in tonight Glance weekly meeting and I will see what I can do. Thanks Best regards, Fei Long Wang (王飞龙)

Re: [openstack-dev] TC candidacy

2014-04-17 Thread Tristan Cacqueray
confirmed On 04/17/2014 06:51 AM, John Dickinson wrote: I'd like to announce my Technical Committee candidacy. I've been involved with OpenStack since it began. I'm one of the original authors of Swift, and I have been serving as PTL since the position was established. I'm employed by

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Nova][Neutron]Detach interface will delete the port

2014-04-17 Thread Sergey Kraynev
There is interesting patch on review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77043/15. I suppose that it's related with discussed problems. Possibly we should wait when it will be merged and then check mentioned use-cases. Regards, Sergey. On 17 April 2014 12:18, Huangtianhua huangtian...@huawei.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][blueprint] Accelerate the booting process of a number of vms via VMThunder

2014-04-17 Thread lihuiba
IMHO, zero-copy approach is better VMThunder's on-demand transferring is the same thing as your zero-copy approach. VMThunder is uses iSCSI as the transferring protocol, which is option #b of yours. Under #b approach, my former experience from our previous similar Cloud deployment (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][blueprint] Accelerate the booting process of a number of vms via VMThunder

2014-04-17 Thread Zhi Yan Liu
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:41 PM, lihuiba magazine.lihu...@163.com wrote: IMHO, zero-copy approach is better VMThunder's on-demand transferring is the same thing as your zero-copy approach. VMThunder is uses iSCSI as the transferring protocol, which is option #b of yours. IMO we'd better to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-17 Thread Kevin Benton
Well we definitely need a better way to get multiple IP addresses onto one host. The current steps are terrible for a user and even for an orchestration system like heat. I can't imagine how convoluted a template would look to automate that process... I'm not suggesting multiple NICs is the only

[openstack-dev] swift doubts

2014-04-17 Thread Sowmya Nethi
Hello everyone, I want to integrate Swift with Nas. So, I have mounted nas storage on to my linux machine and in the place of /dev/sdb, (the device that we specify in swift installation process, I referred this link for swift installation

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][VMWare] qemu-img convert problems for VM creation

2014-04-17 Thread Jay Lau
Thanks Brown, I was using same way as you did but always failed, not sure if it is caused by my image but the image does work for KVM before convert. I will try your image later. Thanks! 2014-04-17 11:04 GMT+08:00 Eric Brown bro...@vmware.com: Good timing. I just tried this today for the

Re: [openstack-dev] 【openstack-dev】【nova】discussion about add support to SSD ephemeral storage

2014-04-17 Thread Yuzhou (C)
Hi Daniel, The intention of image type ('default', 'fast', ' shared', 'sharedfast') look like volume type in cinder. So I think there are two solutions : 1. Like using volume type to configure a multiple-storage back-end in cinder, we could extend nova API , then create image-type

Re: [openstack-dev] 【openstack-dev】【nova】discussion about add support to SSD ephemeral storage

2014-04-17 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:06:03AM +, Yuzhou (C) wrote: Hi Daniel, The intention of image type ('default', 'fast', ' shared', 'sharedfast') look like volume type in cinder. So I think there are two solutions : I was explicitly *NOT* considering those names to be standardized,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Stack snapshots

2014-04-17 Thread Duncan Thomas
You're probably going to want to look at the proposals for volume consistency groups in cinder - backing up/snapshotting volumes independently is likely to cause issues with some applications, since different VMs will be in slightly different states, so you can get lost or duplicated

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][blueprint] Accelerate the booting process of a number of vms via VMThunder

2014-04-17 Thread Jesse Pretorius
On 17 April 2014 11:11, Zhi Yan Liu lzy@gmail.com wrote: As I said currently Nova already has image caching mechanism, so in this case P2P is just an approach could be used for downloading or preheating for image caching. I think P2P transferring/pre-caching sounds a good way to go, as

[openstack-dev] [Keystone] Access to the cloud for unconfirmed users

2014-04-17 Thread Roman Bodnarchuk
Hello, Right now I am trying to set-up a self-signup for users of our OpenStack cloud. One of the essential points of this signup is verification of user's email address - until a user proves that this address belongs to him/her, he/she should not be able to do anything useful in the cloud.

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [nodepool] Modification for use clean KVM/QEMU

2014-04-17 Thread Vladislav Kuzmin
I opened blueprint for detailed description about this feature https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+spec/nodepool-kvm-backend Hi community! I have a modification for Nodepool which allows to use it with a clean KVM/QEMUhost while still support OpenStack. This allows parallel

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Provider Framework and Flavor Framework

2014-04-17 Thread Zang MingJie
Hi Eugene: I have several questions 1. I wonder if tags is really needed. for example, if I want a ipsec vpn, I'll define a flavor which is directly refer to ipsec provider. If using current design, almost all users will end up creating flavors like this: ipsec tags=[ipsec] sslvpn tags=[sslvpn]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Provider Framework and Flavor Framework

2014-04-17 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Zang, 1. so the tags is totally useless, and I suggest replace tags by provider name/uuid. It is much more straightforward and easier. Funny thing is that the goal of flavor framework is directly opposite. We need to hide provider/vendor name. Ssl vpn or ipsec could be implemented by

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-17 Thread CARVER, PAUL
Akihiro Motoki wrote: To cope with such cases, allowed-address-pairs extension was implemented. http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-network/2.0/content/allowed_address_pair_ext_ops.html Question on this in particular: Is a tenant permitted to do this? If so, what exactly is the iptables

[openstack-dev] [murano] Proposal to add Ruslan Kamaldinov to murano-core team

2014-04-17 Thread Timur Sufiev
Guys, Ruslan Kamaldinov has been doing a lot of things for Murano recently (including devstack integration, automation scripts, making Murano more compliant with OpenStack standards and doing many reviews). He's actively participating in our ML discussions as well. I suggest to add him to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-17 Thread CARVER, PAUL
Aaron Rosen wrote: Sorry not really. It's still not clear to me why multiple nics would be required on the same L2 domain. I’m a fan of this old paper for nostalgic reasons http://static.usenix.org/legacy/publications/library/proceedings/neta99/full_papers/limoncelli/limoncelli.pdf but a

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposal to add Ruslan Kamaldinov to murano-core team

2014-04-17 Thread Alexander Tivelkov
+1 Totally agree -- Regards, Alexander Tivelkov On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.com wrote: Guys, Ruslan Kamaldinov has been doing a lot of things for Murano recently (including devstack integration, automation scripts, making Murano more compliant with

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposal to add Ruslan Kamaldinov to murano-core team

2014-04-17 Thread Dmitry Teselkin
+1 Agree On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Alexander Tivelkov ativel...@mirantis.comwrote: +1 Totally agree -- Regards, Alexander Tivelkov On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Timur Sufiev tsuf...@mirantis.comwrote: Guys, Ruslan Kamaldinov has been doing a lot of things for Murano

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][blueprint] Accelerate the booting process of a number of vms via VMThunder

2014-04-17 Thread lihuiba
IMO we'd better to use backend storage optimized approach to access remote image from compute node instead of using iSCSI only. And from my experience, I'm sure iSCSI is short of stability under heavy I/O workload in product environment, it could causes either VM filesystem to be marked as

[openstack-dev] Reviewing spelling and grammar errors in blueprints Re: [Nova] nova-specs

2014-04-17 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On 04/16/2014 07:56 PM, Dan Smith wrote: Do we really want to -1 for spelling mistake in nova-specs? I do, yes. These documents are intended to be read by deployers and future developers. I think it's really important that they're useful in that regard. Guys, use your judgement with this.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][blueprint] Accelerate the booting process of a number of vms via VMThunder

2014-04-17 Thread lihuiba
glance-bittorrent-delivery and VMThunder have similar goals fast provisioning of large amount of VMs, and they share some ideas like P2P transferring, but they go with different techniques. VMThunder only downloads data blocks that are really used by VMs, so as to reduce bandwith and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements and API revision progress

2014-04-17 Thread Eugene Nikanorov
Brandon, Towards the bottom of that document it does mention content switching and how it would work with this. I know its a huge text document and hard to navigate but it is there. Yeah, i should have been more specific. My concern is that 'single-call API' is not powerfull enough right

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] bug/129135 VXLAN kernel version checking

2014-04-17 Thread Terry Wilson
A question about the fix from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82931 Also, how does this work for RHEL-based distros where they tend to backport new kernel features? For instance vxlan support was added in the kernel for RHEL6.5 which is 2.6.32-based... That changeset looks like it breaks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] bug/129135 VXLAN kernel version checking

2014-04-17 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Terry Wilson twil...@redhat.com wrote: A question about the fix from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82931 Also, how does this work for RHEL-based distros where they tend to backport new kernel features? For instance vxlan support was added in the kernel for

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposal to add Ruslan Kamaldinov to murano-core team

2014-04-17 Thread Georgy Okrokvertskhov
+1 On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Dmitry Teselkin dtesel...@mirantis.comwrote: +1 Agree On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Alexander Tivelkov ativel...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 Totally agree -- Regards, Alexander Tivelkov On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Timur Sufiev

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposal to add Ruslan Kamaldinov to murano-core team

2014-04-17 Thread Stan Lagun
+1 Sincerely yours, Stan Lagun Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis sla...@mirantis.com On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:01 AM, Dmitry Teselkin dtesel...@mirantis.comwrote: +1 Agree On Thu,

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposal to add Ruslan Kamaldinov to murano-core team

2014-04-17 Thread Anastasia Kuznetsova
+1 On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Stan Lagun sla...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 Sincerely yours, Stan Lagun Principal Software Engineer @ Mirantis sla...@mirantis.com On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: +1 On Thu, Apr 17,

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Approximate alarming

2014-04-17 Thread Nejc Saje
Hey everyone! I’d like to get your gut reaction on an idea for the future of alarming. Should I or should I not put it up for debate at the design summit? ---TL;DR Online algorithms for computing stream statistics over sliding windows would allow us to provide sample statistics within an error

[openstack-dev] Summit ticket needed, help?

2014-04-17 Thread Adam Harwell
Hello everyone! I was originally not going to be able to attend the summit next month, but things have changed and I would now like to attend. Unfortunately, tickets have become prohibitively expensive at this point. If any of you have or know anyone who has a ticket that they are not going to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] bug/129135 VXLAN kernel version checking

2014-04-17 Thread Edgar Magana Perdomo (eperdomo)
I second Kyle on this, Quite more clear for users to see the version error message on the logs! Edgar On 4/17/14, 7:23 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Terry Wilson twil...@redhat.com wrote: A question about the fix from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] XXXFSDriver: Query on usage of load_shares_config in ensure_shares_mounted

2014-04-17 Thread Deepak Shetty
Andrew, While i agree there is a thought to change/improve this in future, but the way it is today isn't acceptable, mainly bcos (as i said) the new serverIP is taken effect w/o service restart and if someone adds -o options.. even after service restart it doesn't take effect. Its confusing to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] XXXFSDriver: Query on usage of load_shares_config in ensure_shares_mounted

2014-04-17 Thread Deepak Shetty
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Eric Harney ehar...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/11/2014 07:54 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: Hi, I am using the nfs and glusterfs driver as reference here. I see that load_shares_config is called everytime via _ensure_shares_mounted which I feel is incorrect

[openstack-dev] Gerrit downtime and upgrade on 2014-04-28

2014-04-17 Thread Zaro
Hello All. The OpenStack infra team has been working to put everything in place so that we can upgrade review.o.o from Gerrit version 2.4.4 to version 2.8.4 We are happy to announce that we are finally ready to make it happen! We will begin the upgrade on Monday, April 28th at 1600 UTC (the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] XXXFSDriver: Query on usage of load_shares_config in ensure_shares_mounted

2014-04-17 Thread Deepak Shetty
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 10:00 PM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Eric Harney ehar...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/11/2014 07:54 AM, Deepak Shetty wrote: Hi, I am using the nfs and glusterfs driver as reference here. I see that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] XXXFSDriver: Query on usage of load_shares_config in ensure_shares_mounted

2014-04-17 Thread Deepak Shetty
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.comwrote: On 11 April 2014 16:24, Eric Harney ehar...@redhat.com wrote: I suppose I should also note that if the plans in this blueprint are implemented the way I've had in mind, the main issue here about only loading

[openstack-dev] [devstack] Error in running rabbit-mq server

2014-04-17 Thread Peeyush Gupta
Hi all, I am trying to setup OpenStack on Ubuntu 12.04 using devstack. Here is the error I am getting: Setting up rabbitmq-server (2.7.1-0ubuntu4) ... Starting rabbitmq-server: FAILED - check /var/log/rabbitmq/startup_{log, _err} rabbitmq-server. invoke-rc.d: initscript rabbitmq-server, action

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]

2014-04-17 Thread Hachem Chraiti
Hi , how to authenticate against openstack's Ceilometer Client using python program? plase i need response please Sincerly , Chraiti Hachem software enginee ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Regarding manage_existing and unmanage

2014-04-17 Thread Deepak Shetty
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.comwrote: On 11 April 2014 14:21, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: My argument was mostly from the perspective that unmanage shud do its best to revert back the volume to its original state (mainly the name).

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-sdk-php] Questions about user-facing documentation

2014-04-17 Thread Matthew Farina
Shaunak, these are some good questions. Input from the docs team would be useful for some of these as well. On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Shaunak Kashyap shaunak.kash...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi folks, As part of working on

[openstack-dev] Need help to understand Jenkins msgs

2014-04-17 Thread Deepak Shetty
Hi, Can someone help me understand why Jenkins build shows failures for some of the tests for my patch @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86888/ I really couldn't understand it even after clicking those links TIA thanx, deepak ___ OpenStack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Swift] Elastic Recheck failure?

2014-04-17 Thread Pecoraro, Alex
Yesterday I re-submitted a patchset to Gerrit after updating the some comments in a function header and the documentation in docs. So I didn't make any code changes and my previous changeset passed all the Jenkins tests, but this time it failed the check-grenade-dsvm-neutron and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Swift] Elastic Recheck failure?

2014-04-17 Thread Pecoraro, Alex
Doh! Nevermind, I think I figured it out with more careful reading, sorry for the unnecessary email. From: Pecoraro, Alex [mailto:alex.pecor...@emc.com] Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 10:21 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [Swift] Elastic Recheck failure?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Question regarding Nova in Havana

2014-04-17 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
I believe the exchange should also be ‘nova’. Vish On Apr 15, 2014, at 11:31 PM, Prashant Upadhyaya prashant.upadhy...@aricent.com wrote: Hi Vish, Thanks, now one more question – When I send the request out, I send it to the exchange ‘nova’ and routing key ‘conductor’ (using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Design Summit Session Agenda

2014-04-17 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: All, We have a couple IPv6 design summit sessions that have been registered, and at least one of them is in a pre-approved state: http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/21 We'll have at least 40 minutes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Should we adopt a blueprint design process

2014-04-17 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, The discussion of blueprint review has come up recently for several reasons, not the least of which is that I haven't yet reviewed many of the blueprints that have been filed recently. My biggest

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaas] Single call API discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Howdy folks! Based on this morning's IRC meeting, it seems to me there's some contention and confusion over the need for single call functionality for load balanced services in the new API being discussed. This is what I understand: * Those advocating single call are arguing that this simplifies

Re: [openstack-dev] Reviewing spelling and grammar errors in blueprints Re: [Nova] nova-specs

2014-04-17 Thread Carl Baldwin
Personally, I try not to be disagreeable and to be considerate in my reviews. However, I don't want to worry too much about hurting someone's feelings by making a comment. As a community we should be considerate and polite but we should also embrace critical reviews of our own work. I think

Re: [openstack-dev] Reviewing spelling and grammar errors in blueprints Re: [Nova] nova-specs

2014-04-17 Thread Carl Baldwin
I'd prefer that others *not* upload a new patch over mine just to make a spelling correction. I might be in the middle of another version of the patch myself and mine will overwrite yours. If you want to upload a patch over mine please ask me first so that we can coordinate and discuss the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]

2014-04-17 Thread Nejc Saje
Hi, quickly said, you can use the client API with something like: import keystoneclient.v2_0.client as ksclient creds = {‘username’:’demo’, ‘password’:’password’, ‘auth_url’:’keystone auth url’, ‘tenant_name’:’demo’} keystone = ksclient.Client(**creds) import

Re: [openstack-dev] Need help to understand Jenkins msgs

2014-04-17 Thread Zaro
then jenkins failure seems to indicate that jenkins xUnit plugin could not find any test result files for processing. it could be that the test didn't get run or that it ran but didn't generate the rest results required for the plugin to pick up? that's probably where i would check. On Thu, Apr

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron BP review process for Juno

2014-04-17 Thread Carl Baldwin
Sure thing [1]. The easiest change I saw was to remove the restriction that the number of sub titles is exactly 9. This won't require any of the other blueprints already posted for review to change. See what you think. Carl [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88381/ On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-17 Thread Carl Baldwin
I don't see any indication that a floating ip can be associated with any of the secondary addresses. Can this be done? If not, then multiple addresses are not useful if a floating ip is required to make the server public facing. Carl On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Aaron Rosen

[openstack-dev] FW: [Openstack] Network API: how to set fixed MAC address

2014-04-17 Thread Jeffrey Nguyen (jeffrngu)
Hi Devs, I'm not getting any answer for my questions from the openstack general alias for my question about the new enhancement done by Zhi Yan Liu (copied again below). Does anyone here know the answers or know where to check in the code for this enhancement? Zhi, Could you please confirm

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaas] Single call API discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Sri
hello Stephen, I am interested in LBaaS and want to know if we post the weekly meeting's chat transcripts online? or may be update an etherpad? Can you please share the links? thanks, SriD -- View this message in context:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaas] Single call API discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Sri
hello Stephen, I am interested in LBaaS and want to know if we post the weekly meeting's chat transcripts online? or may be update an etherpad? Can you please share the links? thanks, SriD -- View this message in context:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaas] Single call API discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Hi Sri, Yes, the meeting minutes etc. are all available here, usually a few minutes after the meeting is over: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_lbaas/2014/ (You are also, of course, welcome to join!) Stephen On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Sri sri.networ...@gmail.com wrote:

[openstack-dev] TC Candidacy

2014-04-17 Thread Devananda van der Veen
I would like to announce my candidacy for the Technical Committee this term. Background = I began working on OpenStack more than two years ago. Initially, I focused on improving Nova's database API and led the Nova DB team in that cleanup effort for a time. As much of that work was

Re: [openstack-dev] TC Candidacy

2014-04-17 Thread Anita Kuno
confirmed On 04/17/2014 02:48 PM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: I would like to announce my candidacy for the Technical Committee this term. Background = I began working on OpenStack more than two years ago. Initially, I focused on improving Nova's database API and led the

[openstack-dev] [horizon][sahara] Merging Sahara-UI Dashboard code into horizon

2014-04-17 Thread Chad Roberts
Per blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/merge-sahara-dashboard we are merging the Sahara Dashboard UI code into the Horizon code base. Over the last week, I have been working on making this merge happen and along the way some interesting questions have come up.

[openstack-dev] [NEUTRON] [IPv6] [VPNaaS] - IPSec by default on each Tenant router, the beginning of the Opportunistic Encryption era (rfc4322 ?)...

2014-04-17 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
Guys, I here thinking about IPSec when with IPv6 and, one of the first ideas/wishes of IPv6 scientists, was to always deploy it with IPSec enabled, always (I've heard). But, this isn't well diffused by now. Who is actually using IPv6 Opportunistic Encryption?! For example: With O.E., we'll be

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron BP review process for Juno

2014-04-17 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: Sure thing [1]. The easiest change I saw was to remove the restriction that the number of sub titles is exactly 9. This won't require any of the other blueprints already posted for review to change. See what you think.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaas] Single call API discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Oh! One other question: 5. Should single-call stuff work for the lifecycle of a load balancing service? That is to say, should delete functionality also clean up all primitives associated with the service? On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.netwrote: Hi Sri,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron BP review process for Juno

2014-04-17 Thread Carl Baldwin
Wow, easiest merge ever! Can we get this repository counted in our stats?! ;) Carl On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: Sure thing [1]. The easiest change I saw was to remove

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Should we adopt a blueprint design process

2014-04-17 Thread Russell Haering
Completely agree. We're spending too much time discussing features after they're implemented, which makes contribution more difficult for everyone. Forcing an explicit design+review process, using the same tools as we use for coding+review seems like a great idea. If it doesn't work we can

[openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker] dockenstack updated for nova-docker stackforge repo

2014-04-17 Thread Eric Windisch
For those following the dockenstack work, just giving an update that it has finally been updated to work with the nova-docker stackforge repository. The new image is now available on the docker index and may be fetched with 'docker pull ewindisch/dockenstack'. Usage instructions are available in

[openstack-dev] [OSSG][OSSN] Sample Keystone v3 policy exposes privilege escalation vulnerability

2014-04-17 Thread Nathan Kinder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sample Keystone v3 policy exposes privilege escalation vulnerability - --- ### Summary ### The policy.v3cloudsample.json sample Keystone policy file combined with the underlying mutability of the domain ID for user, group, and project entities

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-17 Thread Chris Friesen
On 04/17/2014 06:37 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote: Aaron Rosen wrote: Sorry not really. It's still not clear to me why multiple nics would be required on the same L2 domain. I’m a fan of this old paper for nostalgic reasons

[openstack-dev] [sahara] Sahara 2014.1 (Icehouse) is released !

2014-04-17 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hi everyone, I'm glad to announce the final release of Sahara 2014.1 Icehouse. During this cycle we've completed 58 blueprint and fixed 124 bugs. You can find source tarballs with complete lists of features and bug fixes: https://launchpad.net/sahara/icehouse/2014.1 Release notes contain an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][nova][Neutron] Launch VM with multiple Ethernet interfaces with I.P. of single subnet.

2014-04-17 Thread Carl Baldwin
This review seems to suggest that it can be done: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85432 I was not able to reproduce this in devstack. How does this work? My nova command to add an IP return success but didn't seem to actually add an IP address to the instance and did not show in neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Should we adopt a blueprint design process

2014-04-17 Thread Chris Behrens
+1 On Apr 17, 2014, at 12:27 PM, Russell Haering russellhaer...@gmail.com wrote: Completely agree. We're spending too much time discussing features after they're implemented, which makes contribution more difficult for everyone. Forcing an explicit design+review process, using the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][blueprint] Accelerate the booting process of a number of vms via VMThunder

2014-04-17 Thread Michael Still
If you'd like to have a go at implementing this in nova's Juno release, then you need to create a new-style blueprint in the nova-specs repository. You can find more details about that process at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Nova Some initial thoughts though, some of which have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaas] Single call API discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Eichberger, German
Hi Stephen, 1. Could you please explain what you understand single-call API functionality to be? From my perspective most of our users will likely create load balancers via a web interface. Thought not necessary, having a single API call makes it easier to develop the web interface. For the

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker] dockenstack updated for nova-docker stackforge repo

2014-04-17 Thread Sylvain Bauza
2014-04-17 21:30 GMT+02:00 Eric Windisch ewindi...@docker.com: Furthermore, I've started testing KVM/Qemu support. It's looking promising. It's too early to claim it's supported, but I've only ran into minor issues so far. I'll update again when I've made further progress. Also pending, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][blueprint] Accelerate the booting process of a number of vms via VMThunder

2014-04-17 Thread Zhi Yan Liu
Replied as inline comments. On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:33 PM, lihuiba magazine.lihu...@163.com wrote: IMO we'd better to use backend storage optimized approach to access remote image from compute node instead of using iSCSI only. And from my experience, I'm sure iSCSI is short of stability under

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][blueprint] Accelerate the booting process of a number of vms via VMThunder

2014-04-17 Thread Zhi Yan Liu
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:19 AM, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote: If you'd like to have a go at implementing this in nova's Juno release, then you need to create a new-style blueprint in the nova-specs repository. You can find more details about that process at

[openstack-dev] oslo removal of use_tpool conf option

2014-04-17 Thread Chris Behrens
I’m going to try to not lose my cool here, but I’m extremely upset by this. In December, oslo apparently removed the code for ‘use_tpool’ which allows you to run DB calls in Threads because it was ‘eventlet specific’. I noticed this when a review was posted to nova to add the option within

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaas] Single call API discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Carlos Garza
On Apr 17, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net wrote: Oh! One other question: 5. Should single-call stuff work for the lifecycle of a load balancing service? That is to say, should delete functionality also clean up all primitives associated

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaas] Single call API discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Brandon Logan
Stephen, I have responded to your questions below. On 04/17/2014 01:02 PM, Stephen Balukoff wrote: Howdy folks! Based on this morning's IRC meeting, it seems to me there's some contention and confusion over the need for single call functionality for load balanced services in the new API

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] HA functionality discussion

2014-04-17 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Heyas, y'all! So, given both the prioritization and usage info on HA functionality for Neutron LBaaS here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ar1FuMFYRhgadDVXZ25NM2NfbGtLTkR0TDFNUWJQUWcusp=sharing It's clear that: A. HA seems to be a top priority for most operators B. Almost all load

Re: [openstack-dev] oslo removal of use_tpool conf option

2014-04-17 Thread Michael Still
It looks to me like this was removed in oslo in commit a33989e7a2737af757648099cc1af6c642b6e016, which was synced with nova in 605749ca12af969ac122008b4fa14904df68caf7 (however, I can't see the change being listed in the commit message for nova, which I assume is a process failure). That change

Re: [openstack-dev] oslo removal of use_tpool conf option

2014-04-17 Thread Joshua Harlow
Just an honest question (no negativity intended I swear!). If a configuration option exists and only works with a patched eventlet why is that option an option to begin with? (I understand the reason for the patch, don't get me wrong). Most users would not be able to use such a configuration

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [group-based-policy] Moving the meeting time

2014-04-17 Thread Sumit Naiksatam
We realized it the hard way that we didn't have the entire one hour slot on -meeting-alt at 17:30 on Thursdays. So, we have to move this meeting again. Based on the opinion of those present in today's meeting, there was a consensus for the following time: Thursdays at 1800 UTC on

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][mistral] Mistral agenda item for Heat community meeting on Apr 17

2014-04-17 Thread Zane Bitter
On 17/04/14 00:34, Renat Akhmerov wrote: Ooh, I confused the day of meeting :(. My apologies, I’m in a completely different timezone (for me it’s in the middle of night) so I strongly believed it was on a different day. I’ll be there next time. Yeah, it's really unfortunate that it falls

Re: [openstack-dev] oslo removal of use_tpool conf option

2014-04-17 Thread Chris Behrens
On Apr 17, 2014, at 4:26 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: Just an honest question (no negativity intended I swear!). If a configuration option exists and only works with a patched eventlet why is that option an option to begin with? (I understand the reason for the patch,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Requirements and API revision progress

2014-04-17 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Hi Brandon! Per the meeting this morning, I seem to recall you were looking to have me elaborate on why the term 'load balancer' as used in your API proposal is significantly different from the term 'load balancer' as used in the glossary at:

  1   2   >