[openstack-dev] nova-compute error

2014-04-29 Thread abhishek jain
Hi all I'm getting follwoing error when trying to run nova-compute service.. if ret is None: raise libvirtError ('virNodeListDevices() failed', conn=self) 2014-04-29 00:51:47.153 28127 TRACE nova.openstack.common.threadgroup libvirtError: this function is not supported by the connection driver:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Zang MingJie
Hi all: Currently I'm working on ssl vpn, based on patchsets by Nachi[1] and Rajesh[2] There are secure issues pointed by mark, that ssl private keys are stored plain in database and in config files of vpn-agents. As Barbican is incubated, we can store certs and their private keys in Barbican.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] cinder not support query volume/snapshot with regular expression

2014-04-29 Thread Zhangleiqiang (Trump)
Currently, Nova API achieve this feature based on the database’s REGEX support. Do you have advice on alternative way to achieve it? -- zhangleiqiang (Trump) Best Regards From: laserjetyang [mailto:laserjety...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:49 PM To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [Keystone] [TripleO] Making use of domains by name - policy and API issues?

2014-04-29 Thread Robert Collins
On 29 April 2014 12:27, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: Sure: domain names are unambiguous but user mutable, whereas Heat's approach to using admin tenant name is at risk to both mutability and ambiguity (in a multi-domain deployment). Isn't domainname/user unambiguous and

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Question about the magic 100M when creating zero-size volume

2014-04-29 Thread Zhangleiqiang (Trump)
Hi, all: I find in some of the cinder backend volume drivers, there are codes in create_volume as follows: #cinder.volume.drivers.lvm def _sizestr(self, size_in_g): if int(size_in_g) == 0: return '100m' Similar

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Location of Monitoring Checks

2014-04-29 Thread Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew
Hi all, I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server and compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so my thoughts are now turning to how we would recommend adding new service checks. The concept behind check_mk makes this really simple to do.

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Add Qcow2 volume encryption support

2014-04-29 Thread Zhangleiqiang (Trump)
Hi, all: I find Nova has supported volume encryption for LVM volume ([1]). Currently , qcow2 also support encryption now, and there is libvirt's support too ([2]). After reading up the implementation, qcow2's support can be added to current framework. Do you think it is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Add Qcow2 volume encryption support

2014-04-29 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 09:17:05AM +, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote: Hi, all: I find Nova has supported volume encryption for LVM volume ([1]). Currently , qcow2 also support encryption now, and there is libvirt's support too ([2]). After reading up the implementation, qcow2's

[openstack-dev] Ask for help reviewing nova-specs

2014-04-29 Thread sxmatch
Hi,guys: There is a nova-specs add force detach volume to nova (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84048/)that need more review. It has core review +1 by John. I wish it could be merged before May Day. Thanks your help a lot! app:ds:May%20Day ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [marconi] performance

2014-04-29 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 28/04/14 17:41 +, Janczuk, Tomasz wrote: Hello, Have any performance numbers been published for Marconi? I have asked this question before (http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/031004.html) but there were none at that time. Hi Tomasz, Some folks in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Add Qcow2 volume encryption support

2014-04-29 Thread Zhangleiqiang (Trump)
@Daniel: Thanks for your explanation, it helps me a lot. -- zhangleiqiang (Trump) Best Regards -Original Message- From: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 5:33 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [MagnetoDB] Configuring consistency draft of concept

2014-04-29 Thread Illia Khudoshyn
Hi all, Dima, I think I understand your reasoning but I have some issues with that. I agree that binary logic is much more straightforward and easy to understand and use. But following that logic, having the only one hardcoded consistency level is even easier and more understandable. As I can

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Gerrit upgrade

2014-04-29 Thread Gary Kotton
Hi, Thanks to all those involved. Any chance of restoring the Diff side by side button. The new interface may take a while to get used to. In the past there was a link to the current branch patches. That too is missing. Thanks Gary ___ OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] BBG edit of new API proposal

2014-04-29 Thread Samuel Bercovici
Hi, I think it is a good idea to have the use cases in a different document that API proposals (Stephen's, included) Once we declare the uses cases done for Juno, I will move it to the BP repository. I would also like to see operator's use cases flushed out in the document. Stephen, could you

[openstack-dev] [Juno-Summit] availability of the project project pod rooms on Monday May 12th?

2014-04-29 Thread Eoghan Glynn
... the $subject says it all. Wondering about dedicated spaces for a cores meet-up prior to the design summit proper kicking off on the Tuesday. Thanks! Eoghan ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit New vs. Old Change Views

2014-04-29 Thread Sean Dague
While the infra team I've seen a lot of questions floating on IRC where people are finding that things are missing, not usable. They are mostly related to the New change view. It's worth noting that among the infra team the New change screen is considered unusable (there is a solid jeblair rant

Re: [openstack-dev] [Juno-Summit] availability of the project project pod rooms on Monday May 12th?

2014-04-29 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
IIRC Thierry said that pods will be available starting from Monday. On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: ... the $subject says it all. Wondering about dedicated spaces for a cores meet-up prior to the design summit proper kicking off on the Tuesday.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit New vs. Old Change Views

2014-04-29 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Yup, it sounds like for now the old screen is the only option. I'm now trying to work using the new screen and collect some most annoying issues. On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: While the infra team I've seen a lot of questions floating on IRC where people are

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][IPv6] Cannot make it today

2014-04-29 Thread Shixiong Shang
Hi, guys: For two weeks in the row, I have customer meeting at 10am EDT, which conflicts with our weekly Neutron IPv6 call. I hope this meeting schedule won’t be permanent…Will try my best to avoid it. Sorry for the absence. :( Shixiong Shixiong Shang !--- Stay Hungry, Stay Foolish ---!

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Error running ceilometer tox tests

2014-04-29 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Pendergrass, Eric eric.pendergr...@hp.com wrote: Hi, I pulled devstack yesterday and have been trying to get any test to run successfully. My process is this: Install tox =1.6,1.7 Install libmysqlclient-dev Install mongodb-server Source

[openstack-dev] [nova] Timestamp formats in the REST API

2014-04-29 Thread Mark McLoughlin
Hey In this patch: https://review.openstack.org/83681 by Ghanshyam Mann, we encountered an unusual situation where a timestamp in the returned XML looked like this: 2014-04-08 09:00:14.399708+00:00 What appeared to be unusual was that the timestamp had both sub-second time resolution and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit New vs. Old Change Views

2014-04-29 Thread Anita Kuno
On 04/29/2014 08:26 AM, Sergey Lukjanov wrote: Yup, it sounds like for now the old screen is the only option. I'm now trying to work using the new screen and collect some most annoying issues. Khai had linked to an etherpad that wikimedia has been working on to collect their thoughts on the new

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Gerrit upgrade

2014-04-29 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-04-29 07:09:42 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: Use the old change view. Specifically, if you browse to https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/preferences by default everyone normally starts at Change View: Server Default (Old Screen) so if you make sure it's set to that (or really just

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Gerrit New vs. Old Change Views

2014-04-29 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Anita, thanks, I'll take a look on it. I just find the very nice pros - new screen detects changes and shows small notification, it's very useful for folks like me how opening 500 tabs for review and than iterating through them. On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Timestamp formats in the REST API

2014-04-29 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Tue, 2014-04-29 at 14:48 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: My conclusions from all that: 1) This sucks 2) At the very least, we should be clear in our API samples tests which of the three formats we expect - we should only change the format used in a given part of the API

Re: [openstack-dev] PGP keysigning party for Juno summit in Atlanta?

2014-04-29 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 04/29/2014 06:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote: Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are interested in participating in the key signing in Atlanta: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OpenPGP_Web_of_Trust/Juno_Summit

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Timestamp formats in the REST API

2014-04-29 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: Hey In this patch: https://review.openstack.org/83681 by Ghanshyam Mann, we encountered an unusual situation where a timestamp in the returned XML looked like this: 2014-04-08 09:00:14.399708+00:00 What

Re: [openstack-dev] [MagnetoDB] Configuring consistency draft of concept

2014-04-29 Thread Dmitriy Ukhlov
Hi Illia, WEAK/QUORUM instead of true/false it is ok for me. But we have also STRONG. What does STRONG mean? In current concept we a using QUORUM and say that it is strong. I guess it is confusing (at least for me) and can have different behavior for different backends. I believe that from user

[openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Question of necessary queries for Event implemented on HBase

2014-04-29 Thread Igor Degtiarov
Hi, everybody. I’ve started to work on implementation of Event in ceilometer on HBase backend in the edges of blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/hbase-events-feature By now Events has been implemented only in SQL. You know, using SQL we can build any query we need.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Proposal: remove the server groups feature

2014-04-29 Thread Qiming Teng
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:58:50AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: On 04/25/2014 03:15 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: There are myriad problems with the above user experience and implementation. Let me explain them. 1. The user isn't creating a server group when they issue a nova server-group-create

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Quick update

2014-04-29 Thread Collins, Sean
Just a couple quick notes, since I've been pinged off-list. The summit proposal for the QoS API was rejected due to time constraints, but I'm hoping that we can still meet in Atlanta and discuss the next steps. In the meantime, I have created a draft spec in neutron-specs, but it's mostly just a

Re: [openstack-dev] nova-compute error

2014-04-29 Thread Ben Nemec
This is a development list, and your question sounds usage-related. I suggest asking again on the users list: http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack Thanks. -Ben On 04/29/2014 12:53 AM, abhishek jain wrote: Hi all I'm getting follwoing error when trying to run

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Location of Monitoring Checks

2014-04-29 Thread Ben Nemec
On 04/29/2014 03:16 AM, Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew wrote: Hi all, I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server and compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so my thoughts are now turning to how we would recommend adding new service checks. The

Re: [openstack-dev] Ask for help reviewing nova-specs

2014-04-29 Thread Ben Nemec
Please don't send review requests to the list. The preferred methods are discussed here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html Thanks. -Ben On 04/29/2014 04:45 AM, sxmatch wrote: Hi,guys: There is a nova-specs add force detach volume to nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] [Keystone] [TripleO] Making use of domains by name - policy and API issues?

2014-04-29 Thread Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD - Corvallis)
In Keystone, users are assigned to a domain when they are created. This is a unique combination. -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 11:25 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] PGP keysigning party for Juno summit in Atlanta?

2014-04-29 Thread Davanum Srinivas
How about 10:30 AM Break on Wednesday at the Developers Lounge (Do we have one this time?) -- dims On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 04/29/2014 06:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote: Just a friendly

Re: [openstack-dev] PGP keysigning party for Juno summit in Atlanta?

2014-04-29 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Thomas Goirand's message of 2014-04-29 07:32:59 -0700: On 04/29/2014 06:42 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-04-26 17:05:41 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote: Just a friendly reminder to add yourself to this list if you are interested in participating in the key signing in

Re: [openstack-dev] PGP keysigning party for Juno summit in Atlanta?

2014-04-29 Thread Clint Byrum
Break time is extremely busy in the developers lounge. We can have others in the room, but we need enough of a space for everyone to stand in two lines and rotate and be uninterrupted. Excerpts from Davanum Srinivas's message of 2014-04-29 09:07:12 -0700: How about 10:30 AM Break on Wednesday at

[openstack-dev] [oslo] no meeting this week (2 May)

2014-04-29 Thread Doug Hellmann
Since this is the scheduled off week, I thought we would skip the team meeting on Friday 2 May. Doug ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Question about the magic 100M when creating zero-size volume

2014-04-29 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
This was added long ago to support testing environments without a lot of disk space. Vish On Apr 29, 2014, at 12:12 AM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) zhangleiqi...@huawei.com wrote: Hi, all: I find in some of the cinder backend volume drivers, there are codes in create_volume as

Re: [openstack-dev] How to use OVS in Nova networking without Neutron?

2014-04-29 Thread Edgar Magana Perdomo (eperdomo)
Using OVS with nova-nework will bring you more issues that what you are expected. Security groups will not work and other L3 capabilities. Edgar From: laserjetyang laserjety...@gmail.commailto:laserjety...@gmail.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Zang Thank you for your contribution on this! The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit. [1] We are depending DB security, anyway When we get stolen the private key in the DB, it means we are also stolen ID/PW for DB. If we stolen the key, even if we keep the private

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Zang Thank you for your contribution on this! The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit. Has the idea of using Barbican been discussed before? There are many reasons why using Barbican for this may

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Kyle 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Zang Thank you for your contribution on this! The private key management is what I want to discuss in the summit. Has the idea of using Barbican

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Location of Monitoring Checks

2014-04-29 Thread Gregory Haynes
Hi all, I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server and compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so my thoughts are now turning to how we would recommend adding new service checks. The concept behind check_mk makes this really

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Kyle 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Zang Thank you for your contribution on this! The private key management is

[openstack-dev] [QA] No Meeting this Week

2014-04-29 Thread Matthew Treinish
Hi Everyone, Since this is the scheduled off week, I'm going to cancel this week's QA meeting. The next meeting will be on May 8th and will be at 22:00 UTC instead of having two consecutive meetings at the same time. I will send out the usual reminder email next week. Thanks, Matt Treinish

Re: [openstack-dev] PGP keysigning party for Juno summit in Atlanta?

2014-04-29 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-04-29 09:16:53 -0700 (-0700), Clint Byrum wrote: [...] I think Wednesday would be the ideal day, as it has the most overlap with the conference and is at least adjacent to if not within most design tracks. [...] Seconded. I suggest we ensure that everyone understands the process and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Use Case Question

2014-04-29 Thread Carlos Garza
I mis quoted it should be in RFC 5246 not 5264. On Apr 25, 2014, at 2:50 AM, Carlos Garza carlos.ga...@rackspace.commailto:carlos.ga...@rackspace.com wrote: Trevor is referring to our plans on using the SSL session ID of the ClientHello to provide session persistence. See RFC 5264

Re: [openstack-dev] PGP keysigning party for Juno summit in Atlanta?

2014-04-29 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-04-29 08:52:38 +0400 (+0400), Sergey Lukjanov wrote: +1 to lock May 7 I've updated the wiki article to note that I'll lock it for further edits at the end of the (UTC) day on the 7th and generate the checksummed list from it, then link it there for everyone to download as quickly as I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Agent manager customization

2014-04-29 Thread Bob Melander (bmelande)
Hi Zzelle, Carl and others, We’ve been doing work on a more modular agent whose responsibilities are basically to: 1: apply configurations in devices when Neutron service resources (like Neutron Routers) are created or updated. 2: monitor the health of devices hosting such service resources

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron] VIF event callbacks implementation

2014-04-29 Thread Dan Smith
Aside from creating a sort of cyclic dependency between the two, it is my understanding that Neutron is meant to be a stand alone service capable of being consumed by other compute managers (i.e. oVirt). This breaks that paradigm. snip So my question is: Why use API and not RPC? I saw

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] cinder not support query volume/snapshot with regular expression

2014-04-29 Thread Jay Pipes
On 04/29/2014 02:16 AM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote: Currently, Nova API achieve this feature based on the database’s REGEX support. Do you have advice on alternative way to achieve it? Hi Trump, Unfortunately, REGEXP support in databases is almost always ridiculously slow compared to prefix

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] cinder not support query volume/snapshot with regular expression

2014-04-29 Thread Steven Kaufer
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote on 04/29/2014 02:26:42 PM: From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Date: 04/29/2014 02:27 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] cinder not support query volume/snapshot with regular expression On 04/29/2014 02:16 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Nova][Keystone][docs] Version responses links

2014-04-29 Thread Diane Fleming
I would prefer to link to docs.openstack.org or the API reference pages with specific links like this: http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-blockstorage-v2.html, http://api.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2.html, and so on. The issue I have with linking to the specs is that they are likely going to

[openstack-dev] [oslo] preparing oslo.i18n for graduation

2014-04-29 Thread Doug Hellmann
I have exported the gettextutils code and related files to a new git repository, ready to be imported as oslo.i18n. Please take a few minutes to look over the files and give it a sanity check. https://github.com/dhellmann/oslo.i18n Thanks, Doug ___

Re: [openstack-dev] [marconi] performance

2014-04-29 Thread Janczuk, Tomasz
Hi Flavio, Thanks! I also added some comments to the performance test plan at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/marconi-benchmark-plans we talked about yesterday. Thanks, Tomasz On 4/29/14, 2:52 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 28/04/14 17:41 +, Janczuk, Tomasz wrote: Hello,

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova][Designate][L3][IPv6] Discussion about Cross-Project Integration of DNS at Summit

2014-04-29 Thread Carl Baldwin
The design summit discussion topic I submitted [1] for my DNS blueprints [2][3][4] and this one [5] just missed the cut for the design session schedule. It stung a little to be turned down but I totally understand the time and resource constraints that drove the decision. I feel this is an

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] cancel next team meeting May 1

2014-04-29 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Ok, so, the May 1 meeting is canceled. On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com wrote: We'll have one more meeting before the summit - May 8 :) On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Farrellee m...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/25/2014 07:23 AM, Sergey Lukjanov

Re: [openstack-dev] Issues when running unit tests in OpenStack

2014-04-29 Thread John Dennis
You may want to take a peek at this recent thread, there may be information in it you'll find useful. http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/029408.html -- John ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] BBG edit of new API proposal

2014-04-29 Thread Vijay B
Hi Sam, Evgeny, I've reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031 with my comments. I am not sure if there is a request with code newer than this link - please do let me know if that is the case. Thanks, Regards, Vijay On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Eichberger, German

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] BBG edit of new API proposal

2014-04-29 Thread Vijay B
Also, a section for the API specification for the newly created SSL extensions needs to be added to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL. Regards, Vijay On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Vijay B os.v...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sam, Evgeny, I've reviewed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] BBG edit of new API proposal

2014-04-29 Thread Eichberger, German
Stephen + Sam, I have added some of the operator use cases. We also created a document earlier (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ar1FuMFYRhgadDVXZ25NM2NfbGtLTkR0TDFNUWJQUWc#gid=0) listing all the features we consider essential (and everybody voted with real world data) for the LB

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Location of Monitoring Checks

2014-04-29 Thread Robert Collins
Or have a check-mk.d directory and pull stuff on from there automatically On 30 Apr 2014 04:03, Gregory Haynes g...@greghaynes.net wrote: Hi all, I have a patch in flight at the moment [0] to install check_mk server and compliment the already merged installation of check_mk agent [1] so

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] BBG edit of new API proposal

2014-04-29 Thread Eichberger, German
Vijay, SSL and certificate management is a major requirement from a cloud operator perspective. The VPN part of Neutron is looking into using Barbican and I am surprised that LB is going a different way/implementing their own store. Just for the record I prefer Barbican ☺ Furthermore, we are

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] BBG edit of new API proposal

2014-04-29 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Per Samuel's request, I have set my API proposal document to be edit-able by all. Also, my work priorities have changed somewhat in preparation for the summit in two weeks, so I may not be able to add more use cases prior to the summit. On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Samuel Bercovici

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] [heat] Environments Working Group

2014-04-29 Thread Roshan Agrawal
Per decision in the the Solum weekly IRC meeting today, we will have the environment working group discussion via ML/etherpad. GOAL: develop a POV on 1. Which OpenStack program/projects should Environments live under 2. What projects does Environments depend on (Heat, Keystone, OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-04-29 10:58:53 -0700: Hi Kyle 2014-04-29 10:52 GMT-07:00 Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com: On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote: Hi Zang Thank you for your contribution on this! The private key management

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] SSL VPN Implemenatation

2014-04-29 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Clint Thank you for your suggestion. Your point get taken :) Kyle This is also a same discussion for LBaaS Can we discuss this in advanced service meeting? Zang Could you join the discussion? 2014-04-29 15:48 GMT-07:00 Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com: Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO and Docker session etherpad

2014-04-29 Thread James Slagle
Hi, I thought I'd send out the link to the etherpad I've put together for the summit session I proposed on TripleO and Docker. If there's any initial discussion or something you'd like to see added, please reply here or add directly to the etherpad.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] BBG edit of new API proposal

2014-04-29 Thread Carlos Garza
On Apr 27, 2014, at 8:35 AM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:03 AM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com wrote: Speaking of SSL - we have a few few project-wise issues such as lack of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] BBG edit of new API proposal

2014-04-29 Thread Vijay B
Hi German, Thanks for bringing up the VPN SSL implementation - we just took a look at the blueprint: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B4kh-7VVPWlPOWlTM0QzNDJucjg/edit and it matches the design we would take with the SSL entity portion of the effort, in that we would like to make them first class

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] BBG edit of new API proposal

2014-04-29 Thread Carlos Garza
This blueprint was marked abandoned. On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Vijay B os.v...@gmail.commailto:os.v...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Sam, Evgeny, I've reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031 with my comments. I am not sure if there is a request with code newer than this link - please do

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] [LBaaS][VPN] SSL cert implementation for LBaaS and VPN

2014-04-29 Thread Vijay B
Hi, It looks like there are areas of common effort in multiple efforts that are proceeding in parallel to implement SSL for LBaaS as well as VPN SSL in neutron. Two relevant efforts are listed below: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031/ ( https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] BBG edit of new API proposal

2014-04-29 Thread Vijay B
Hi Carlos, It looks like only the gerrit review has been marked abandoned because of a week of inactivity. Regards, Vijay On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Carlos Garza carlos.ga...@rackspace.comwrote: This blueprint was marked abandoned. On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Vijay B

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova][Designate][L3][IPv6] Discussion about Cross-Project Integration of DNS at Summit

2014-04-29 Thread Rich Megginson
On 04/29/2014 06:59 PM, Collins, Sean wrote: Count me in! +1 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Nova][Designate][L3][IPv6] Discussion about Cross-Project Integration of DNS at Summit

2014-04-29 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
I'll be an alpha / beta tester, for sure!! :-D I'm very interested on DNS for IPv6 in Neutron (and in Horizon too)... Hope to see it in Juno!! IPv6 (with a perfect DNS setup) is very important... Best! Thiago On 29 April 2014 17:09, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: The design summit