Hi,
After huge discussion related to v3 API[1], we started to implement v2.1 API.
I'd like to share the current status and get feedback before the summit.
Now we are implementing for two items:
1. Add response checks to Tempest for Nova API
2. Implement v2.1 API
* Add response checks to Tempest
Hi all
I'm trying too boot Vm from my controller node onto compute node and
getting following error in nova-compute service ...
2014-04-30 05:10:22.452 17049 TRACE nova.openstack.common.rpc.amqp if
ret == -1: raise libvirtError ('virDomainCreateWithFlags() failed',
dom=self)
2014-04-30
This is now done. Sorry for the delay.
Michael
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
ken1ohmi...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-04-28 11:00 GMT+09:00 Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Kenichi Oomichi
oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp wrote:
Hi Michael,
Thanks
Fixed. I've swapped the image precaching and live upgrade sessions.
Hopefully this hasn't caused problems for any image precaching
peoples.
Michael
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 4:00 PM, Tom Fifield t...@openstack.org wrote:
On 28/04/14 05:02, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
I've just pushed a draft
Hi.
I was intending to run a nova meeting this week, but I don't think its
worth a mutiny over the off week that the rest of the project is
respecting. The only agenda items I can think of are:
- please prepare your summit sessions
- I've attempted to fix the clashes in scheduling that are
Hi all,
Following the mailing list thread started by Marios I've put some
initial questions to discuss into this etherpad document:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-summit-tripleo-neutron
You are encouraged to take a look at it and add your thoughts and/or
questions :)
Thanks,
Roman
Hi all,
Just a reminder that May 5th is our next scheduled meeting day, but I
probably won't make it, because I'll be just getting back from one trip and
start two consecutive weeks of conference travel early the next morning.
Chris Krelle (nobodycam) has offered to chair that meeting in my
Hi Matthew,
2014-04-28 11:54 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com:
2014-04-28 11:02 GMT+09:00 Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 01:01:00AM +, Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
Now we are working for adding Nova API responses checks to Tempest[1] to
block
# Sorry for sending this again, previous mail was unreadable.
2014-04-28 11:54 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com:
This is also why there are a bunch of nova v2 extensions that just add
properties to an existing API. I think in v3 the proposal was to do this with
microversioning
Zang mentioned that part of the issue is that the private key has to be
stored in the OpenVPN config file. If the config files are generated and
can be stored, then storing the whole config file in Barbican protects the
private key (and any other settings) without having to try to deliver the
key
Hi,
I created a swift cluster and configured the rings like this...
swift-ring-builder object.builder create 10 3 1
ubuntu-202:/etc/swift$ swift-ring-builder object.builder
object.builder, build version 12
1024 partitions, 3.00 replicas, 1 regions, 4 zones, 12 devices, 300.00
balance
The
In the original API there was a way to remove members from the group.
This didn't make it into the code that was submitted.
Well, it didn't make it in because it was broken. If you add an instance to a
group after it's running, a migration may need to take place in order to keep
the
Nova now can detect host unreachable. But it fails to make out host isolation,
host dead and nova compute service down. When host unreachable is reported,
users have to find out the exact state by himself and then take the
appropriate measure to recover. Therefore we'd like to improve the host
Hi David, Ken'ichi,
Thursday, May 1, 2014 1:02 PM Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com:
Hi David,
2014-05-01 5:44 GMT+09:00 David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com:
There have been a lot of patches that add the validation of response dicts.
We need a policy on whether this is required or not. For
Hi,
My opinion is that keeping neutron API style is very important but it
doesn't prevent single call API from being implemented.
Flat fine-grained API is obviously the most flexible, but that doesn't mean
we can't support single call API as well.
By the way, looking at the implementation I see
Jay Pipes and all, I'm planning to merge this topic to
http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/event/77801877aa42b595f14ae8b020cd1999after
some discussion in this week's Gantt IRC meeting, hope it is OK.
Thanks!
2014-05-01 19:56 GMT+08:00 Day, Phil philip@hp.com:
In the original API there
+1
I can't attend to the metting too, I will be at the marriage of a
friend. BTW, I will like to tell you guys, that for us (Argentina
folks), today and tomorrow are days off.
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 00:11 +0400, Dina Belova wrote:
+1
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Sylvain Bauza
Hi Jorge,
A couple of inline comments:
Now that we have a set of requirements the next question to ask is, How
doe we prioritize requirements so that we can start designing and
implementing them?
Prioritization basically means that we want to support everything and only
choose what is
more
I am expecting to be more active on community on the LBaaS front.
May be reviewing and picking-up a few items to work as well.
I had a look at the proposal. Seeing Single Multi-Call approach for each
workflow
makes it easy to understand.
Thanks for the clear documentation, it is
Sorry, missed the phrase ending:
It's not because developers of lbaas have not thought about it, it's
because we were limited in dev and core reviewing
resources, so implement
so implementing some of the operators requirements was always in our plans.
Eugene.
Hi,
We recently implemented our V2 REST API, and at this moment we are
trying to get working our python client against this new version. For
this reason, we start a discussion about how the client will choose/set
the REST API version to use. BTW, we are not deprecating our V1 REST
API, so
Vijay,
Comments in-line, hope I can clear some of this up for you :)
-Trevor
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 13:16 +, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
I am expecting to be more active on community on the LBaaS front.
May be reviewing and picking-up a few items to work as well.
I had a look at the
On 30/04/14 15:37 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
Hi all,
Just a reminder that May 5th is our next scheduled meeting day, but I
probably won't make it, because I'll be just getting back from one trip and
start two consecutive weeks of conference travel early the next morning.
Chris Krelle
Same for Russia. But I'm not sure is it 1 and 2 May, or more
Nikolay Starodubtsev
Software Engineer
Mirantis Inc.
Skype: dark_harlequine1
2014-05-01 5:59 GMT-07:00 Fuente, Pablo A pablo.a.fue...@intel.com:
+1
I can't attend to the metting too, I will be at the marriage of a
friend.
On 5/1/2014 1:58 AM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
I was intending to run a nova meeting this week, but I don't think its
worth a mutiny over the off week that the rest of the project is
respecting. The only agenda items I can think of are:
- please prepare your summit sessions
- I've
Hi Shyam,
If I am reading your ring output correctly, it looks like only the devices
in node .202 have a weight set, and thus why all of your objects are going
to that one node. You can update the weight of the other devices, and
rebalance, and things should get distributed correctly.
--
Chuck
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 06:18:10PM +0900, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
# Sorry for sending this again, previous mail was unreadable.
2014-04-28 11:54 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com:
This is also why there are a bunch of nova v2 extensions that just add
properties to an
That sounds like a sensible way forward, yes.
If the dependency is not need, then great, makes review and merge even easier.
Thanks
On 28 April 2014 17:03, Jay S. Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote:
Duncan,
Thanks for the response. Have some additional thoughts, in-line, below:
On 29 April 2014 20:23, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote:
Yeah, we've already got plans in place to get Cinder to use the
interface to provide us more detailed information and eliminate some
polling. We also have a very purpose-built notification scheme between
nova and cinder that
Thanks Trevor. Replies inline!
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Vardeman [mailto:trevor.varde...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2014 7:30 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] RackSpace API review (multi-
call)
Vijay,
The patch you've been looking at just changes the way in which SystemExit
is used, it does not replace it with sys.exit.
In my experience sys.exit was causing unit test threads to interrupt
abruptly, whereas SystemExit was being caught by the test runner and
handled.
I find therefore a bit strange
Hello,
I've been going through the 40+ use cases, and I couldn't help but
notice some additions that are either unclear or not descriptive.
For ease of reference, I'll link the document:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ewl95yxAMq2fO0Z6Dz6fL-w2FScERQXQR1-mXuSINis/edit#
I took a look at most
I arrive Sunday at 3:30pm. Either Sunday or Monday are fine with me.
Lookging forward to it :-)
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Koderer, Marc m.kode...@telekom.de wrote:
Hi folks,
last time we met one day before the Summit started for a short meet-up.
Should we do the same this time?
I
Hi Jarret
IMO, Zang point is the issue saving plain private key in the
filesystem for OpenVPN.
Isn't this same even if we use Barbican?
2014-05-01 2:56 GMT-07:00 Jarret Raim jarret.r...@rackspace.com:
Zang mentioned that part of the issue is that the private key has to be
stored in the
I will arrive Sunday late.
If you meet on Monday I’ll see you there ^_^
From: Miguel Lavalle [mailto:mig...@mlavalle.com]
Sent: 01 May 2014 17:28
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] QA Summit Meet-up Atlanta
I arrive Sunday
Vijay, I'm following suit: Replies in line :D
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 16:11 +, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
Thanks Trevor. Replies inline!
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Vardeman [mailto:trevor.varde...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2014 7:30 PM
To:
Excuse me interrupting but couldn't you treat the key as largely
ephemeral, pull it down from Barbican, start the OpenVPN process and
then purge the key? It would of course still be resident in the memory
of the OpenVPN process but should otherwise be protected against
filesystem disk-residency
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Fuente, Pablo A pablo.a.fue...@intel.comwrote:
Hi,
We recently implemented our V2 REST API, and at this moment we are
trying to get working our python client against this new version. For
this reason, we start a discussion about how the client will
Hi,
I've searched launchpad, and didn't find out. This didn't work:
https://launchpad.net/oslo.config/+bugs
Should I report bugs at:
https://launchpad.net/oslo/+bugs
???
Anyway, the bug is this:
==
FAIL:
Hi Robert
Thank you for your suggestion.
so your suggestion is let OpenVPN process download key to memory
directly from Babican?
2014-05-01 9:42 GMT-07:00 Clark, Robert Graham robert.cl...@hp.com:
Excuse me interrupting but couldn't you treat the key as largely
ephemeral, pull it down from
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.comwrote:
The patch you've been looking at just changes the way in which SystemExit
is used, it does not replace it with sys.exit.
In my experience sys.exit was causing unit test threads to interrupt
abruptly, whereas
Hi,
I have got one question: if there is something wrong with a test case, and
it causes the review can proceed, what should I do?
Thanks,
Hao
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi Chuck,
Thanks for the reply.
The reason for such weight distribution seems to do with the ring rebalance
command. I've scripted the disk addition (and rebalance) process to the
ring using a wrapper command. When I trigger the rebalance after each disk
addition, only the first rebalance seems
I think you'd do something like this (Note that I don't know off the top
of my head the barbican CLI or openvpn cli switches... just
pseudo-code):
oconf=$(mktemp -d /tmp/openvpnconfig.XX)
mount -o tmpfs $oconf size=1M
barbican get my-secret-openvpn-conf $oconf/foo.conf
openvpn --config-dir
Hi Everyone!
To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have ~45 use
cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something like
surveymonkey.
The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask you
identify and vote.
Then we will
On May 1, 2014, at 10:32 AM, Shyam Prasad N nspmangal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chuck,
Thanks for the reply.
The reason for such weight distribution seems to do with the ring rebalance
command. I've scripted the disk addition (and rebalance) process to the ring
using a wrapper command.
Hi Vijay,
I have looked at the Barbican APIs –
https://github.com/cloudkeep/barbican/wiki/Application-Programming-Interface
I was no able to see a “native” API that will accept an SSL certificate
(private key, public key, CSR, etc.) and will store it.
We can either store the whole certificate
On 05/01/2014 11:36 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 06:18:10PM +0900, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
# Sorry for sending this again, previous mail was unreadable.
2014-04-28 11:54 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com:
This is also why there are a bunch of nova v2
Please take a gander and let me know your thoughts!
Prototype: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/91437/
Blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/l3-svcs-vendor-validation
Spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88406/
Thanks!
PCM (Paul Michali)
MAIL …..….
On 05/01/2014 01:30 PM, David Kranz wrote:
On 05/01/2014 11:36 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 06:18:10PM +0900, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
# Sorry for sending this again, previous mail was unreadable.
2014-04-28 11:54 GMT+09:00 Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com:
This
So, I tried to reproduce, but I actually see the same results with both of
these. However, they both show the issue I was hitting, namely, I got no
information on where the failure was located:
root@devstack-32:/opt/stack/neutron# tox -e py27 -v --
neutron.tests.unit.pcm.test_pcm
using
Hey Eugene,
I think there is a misunderstanding on what iterative development means to you
and me and I want to make sure we are on the same page. First of all, I'll try
not to use the term duct-taping even though it's a widely used term in the
industry. My main concern is that implementing
That sounds good to me. The only thing I would caution is that we have
prioritized certain requirements (like HA and SSL Termination) and I want to
ensure we use the survey to compliment what we have already mutually agreed
upon. Thanks for spearheading this!
Cheers,
--Jorge
From: Samuel
With regard to the last paragraph/sentence about a new driver, I am writing a
lengthy analysis of that specific topic currently — hopefully we will be able
to start an in-depth discussion on that later today.
--Adam
From: Jorge Miramontes
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Paul Michali (pcm) p...@cisco.com wrote:
==
FAIL: process-returncode
tags: worker-1
--
*Binary content:*
* traceback
On 05/01/2014 12:11 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
I've searched launchpad, and didn't find out. This didn't work:
https://launchpad.net/oslo.config/+bugs
Should I report bugs at:
https://launchpad.net/oslo/+bugs
Yes. All of the Oslo projects are tracked under the same LP project
because
Ah I got it now!
so even if we get stolen HDD, we can keep password safe.
However, I'm still not sure why this is more secure..
anyway, the ID/PW to access barbican will be written in neutron.conf, right?
Furthermore, ID/PW for mysql will be written in conf file..
so if we can't trust unix file
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 20:49 +0800, Jay Lau wrote:
Jay Pipes and all, I'm planning to merge this topic to
http://junodesignsummit.sched.org/event/77801877aa42b595f14ae8b020cd1999
after some discussion in this week's Gantt IRC meeting, hope it is OK.
I'll be there :)
Thanks!
-jay
Hey Doug,
it looks nice, only two questions:
* why tests aren't located inside the main package (oslo/i18n/tests for ex.)?
* when are you planning to make first release?
Thanks.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:48 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
I have exported the gettextutils
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 18:41 +, Paul Michali (pcm) wrote:
So, I tried to reproduce, but I actually see the same results with
both of these. However, they both show the issue I was hitting,
namely, I got no information on where the failure was located:
So, this is pretty much by design. A
Excerpts from Nachi Ueno's message of 2014-05-01 12:04:23 -0700:
Ah I got it now!
so even if we get stolen HDD, we can keep password safe.
However, I'm still not sure why this is more secure..
anyway, the ID/PW to access barbican will be written in neutron.conf, right?
Yes. However, you
Le 1 mai 2014 19:11, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Fuente, Pablo A pablo.a.fue...@intel.com
wrote:
Hi,
We recently implemented our V2 REST API, and at this moment we
are
trying to get working our python client against this new
Yep, I'm all for this as well!
Note: We're just talking about user use cases in this survey, correct?
(We'll leave the operator use cases for later when we have more of a story
and/or model to work with on how we're going to approach those, yes?)
Thanks,
Stephen
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 11:54
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Sergey Lukjanov slukja...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hey Doug,
it looks nice, only two questions:
* why tests aren't located inside the main package (oslo/i18n/tests for ex.)?
That's the way the other oslo libs are. I frankly don't remember the reason.
* when are
Stephen,
I would prefer if we can vote on them, too. They are essential and I would like
to make sure they are considered first-class citizen when it comes to use cases.
Thanks,
German
From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 12:52 PM
To: OpenStack
Hi,
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Jorge Miramontes
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey Eugene,
I think there is a misunderstanding on what iterative development means
to you and me and I want to make sure we are on the same page. First of
all, I'll try not to use the term
Hi all,
Just a reminder that May 5th is our next scheduled meeting day, but I probably
won't make it, because I'll be just getting back from one trip and start two
consecutive weeks of conference travel early the next morning. Chris Krelle
(nobodycam) has offered to chair that meeting in my
I was going to bring up Postern [1] as well, Clint. Unfortunately not much work
has been done on it though.
[1] https://github.com/cloudkeep/postern
Thanks,
John
From: Clint Byrum [cl...@fewbar.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 2:22 PM
To:
Hello Samuel,
Just noting that the link below shows current-state Barbican. We are in the
process of designing SSL certificate support for Barbican via blueprints such
as this one:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Barbican/Blueprints/ssl-certificates
We intend to discuss this feature in Atlanta
Hi Eugene,
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 00:10 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 10:46 PM, Jorge Miramontes
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hey Eugene,
I think there is a misunderstanding on what iterative
development
Hello,
After going back through the use-cases to double check some of my
understanding, I realized I didn't quite understand the ones I had
already answered. I'll use a specific use-case as an example of my
misunderstanding here, and hopefully the clarification can be easily
adapted to the rest
We wanted a discussion to happen on whether the existing object model
would work with both API proposals. That blueprint being pushed to
gerrit the same time as Stephen mailing out his proposal made it seem
like this was not going to happen.
I'm sorry about that. In fact I was just
Hello Everyone!
My name is Alexandre Viau from Savoir-Faire Linux.
We have submited a Monitoring as a Service blueprint and need feedback.
Problem to solve: Ceilometer's purpose is to track and *measure/meter* usage
information collected from OpenStack components (originally for billing).
I am sending this now to gauge interest and get feedback on what I see as an
impending necessity — updating the existing haproxy driver, replacing it, or
both. Though we're not there yet, it is probably best to at least start the
discussion now, to hopefully limit some fragmentation that may be
Hi folks
Clint
Thanks, things get clear for me now :)
2014-05-01 13:21 GMT-07:00 John Wood john.w...@rackspace.com:
I was going to bring up Postern [1] as well, Clint. Unfortunately not much
work has been done on it though.
[1] https://github.com/cloudkeep/postern
Thanks,
John
On 05/01/2014 12:27 PM, Hao Wang wrote:
Hi,
I have got one question: if there is something wrong with a test case,
and it causes the review can proceed, what should I do?
You mean you hit a bug in a test case? If so, see the link Jenkins
posted to the review:
On 04/29/2014 02:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I have exported the gettextutils code and related files to a new git
repository, ready to be imported as oslo.i18n. Please take a few
minutes to look over the files and give it a sanity check.
https://github.com/dhellmann/oslo.i18n
Thanks,
Doug
No
As usual, comments are inline.
Cheers,
--Jorge
From: Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, May 1,
On 04/09/2014 11:11 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I have started writing up some general steps for adding oslo libs to
projects, and I would like some feedback about the results. They can't
go into too much detail about specific changes in a project, because
those will vary by library and project. I
Yeah, I feel bad that we haven't had one in three weeks now -- its
definitely a thing I am not happy with. Next week for sure.
Michael
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Matt Riedemann
mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 5/1/2014 1:58 AM, Michael Still wrote:
Hi.
I was intending to run a
Question for those of you using the SSL session ID for persistency: About
how long do you typically set these sessions to persist?
Also, I think this is a cool way to handle this kind of persistence
efficiency-- I'd never seen it done that way before, eh!
It should also almost go without saying
Hi Trevor,
I was the one who wrote that use case based on discussion that came out of
the question I wrote the list last week about SSL re-encryption: Someone
had stated that sometimes pool members are local, and sometimes they are
hosts across the internet, accessible either through the usual
Raising SystemExit *or* calling sys.exit() are poor ideas: only outer
layer code should do that. Plumbing should only be raising semantic,
normally catchable exceptions IMO.
-Rob
On 2 May 2014 07:09, Kevin L. Mitchell kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 18:41 +, Paul
Hi Trevor,
Some of these use cases are mine, I will try to clarify the ones that are
in-line:
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Trevor Vardeman
trevor.varde...@rackspace.com wrote:
Use-Case 10: I assumed this was referring to the source-IP that
accesses the Load Balancer. As far as I know
Balukoff I'm liking your API spec so far but can you elaborate on what
this loadbalancer object you refer to is. on page You declare its immutable and
refer to it like an actual primitive object yet I don't
see a schema for it. I see loadbalancer_id in the vip request that reference.
The
our stingray nodes don't allow you to specify. Its just an enable or disable
option.
On May 1, 2014, at 7:35 PM, Stephen Balukoff
sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Question for those of you using the SSL session ID for persistency: About how
long do you typically set
Hi Adam,
Thank you very much for starting this discussion! In answer do your
questions from my perspective:
1. I think that it makes sense to start at least one new driver that
focuses on running software virtual appliances on Nova nodes (the NovaHA
you referred to above). The existing haproxy
My thoughts are inline (in red, since I can't figure out how to get Outlook to
properly format the email the way I want).
From: Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Comments in red. I'm tired, so hopefully most of what I say makes sense. :)
From: Stephen Balukoff sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
On May 1, 2014, at 7:48 PM, Stephen Balukoff
sbaluk...@bluebox.netmailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net
wrote:
Hi Trevor,
I was the one who wrote that use case based on discussion that came out of the
question I wrote the list last week about SSL re-encryption: Someone had
stated that sometimes
Hi. This is a reminder mail for the servicevm IRC meeting
May 6, 2014 Tuesdays 5:00(AM)UTC-
#openstack-meeting on freenode
(May 13 will be skipped due to design summit)
* design summit plan
- unconference
* status update
* new project planning
- project name
code name: virtue, ginie,
Hi John,
Thanks for the explanation. Have a couple of more questions on this subject
though.
1. pretend_min_hours_passed sounds like something that I could use. I'm
okay if there is a chance of interruption in services to the user at this
time, as long as it does not cause any data-loss or
92 matches
Mail list logo
