Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][all] switch from mysqldb to another eventlet aware mysql client

2014-07-10 Thread Angus Lees
On 10 July 2014 00:59, Roman Podoliaka rpodoly...@mirantis.com wrote: Not sure what issues you are talking about, but I just replaced mysql with mysql+mysqlconnector in my db connection string in neutron.conf and neutron-db-manage upgrade head worked like a charm for an empty schema. Yep,

[openstack-dev] [Trove] Postgresql Anyone working on DBaaS?

2014-07-10 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Where I work we make use of Postgresql for most of our database needs. It would be nice to be able to offer a Postgresql flavor within the Trove framework. Is anyone working on adding it in? If noone else is, then I might look at doing it, if there are folks working on it - let me know if I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2] Support dpdk ovs with ml2 plugin

2014-07-10 Thread Irena Berezovsky
Hi, For passing information from neutron to nova VIF Driver, you should use binding:vif_details dictionary. You may not require new VIF_TYPE, but can leverage the existing VIF_TYPE_OVS, and add ‘use_dpdk’ in vif_details dictionary. This will require some rework of the existing libvirt

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][third-party] Simple and robust CI script?

2014-07-10 Thread Luke Gorrie
On 9 July 2014 20:24, Sullivan, Jon Paul jonpaul.sulli...@hp.com wrote: Incidentally, is there already way to review what votes my CI (or indeed anybody's) is casting via an openstack.org web interface? You can look at the individual account dashboards in Gerrit, like:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Postgresql Anyone working on DBaaS?

2014-07-10 Thread Denis Makogon
Hello Mark. There are several patches for Postgresql are hanging at the review queue. Here's useful link: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spec/postgresql-support Contact point: Kevin Conway (you can ping him in IRC and ask if he needs any help) Best regards, Denis Makogon On Thu,

[openstack-dev] Where should a test for eventlet and oslo.db interaction go?

2014-07-10 Thread Angus Lees
We have an issue with neutron (and presumably elsewhere), where mysqldb and eventlet may deadlock, until the mysqldb deadlock timer fires. I believe it's responsible for ~all of these failures:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][third-party] Simple and robust CI script?

2014-07-10 Thread Luke Gorrie
Howdy! I've been operating a shellci for a while now and overall it is very smooth. The main new feature now is to automatically retrigger events that neither definitely succeed (exit status 100) nor definitely fail (exit status 101). In this case the CI will vote 0 with the logs and then

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron]Describing suitable binding_types from the hypervisor

2014-07-10 Thread Ian Wells
I hadn't realised until today that the BP window for new Nova specs in Juno had closed, and I'm hoping I might get an exception for a minor, but I think helpful, change in the way VIF plugging works. At the moment, Neutron's plugin returns a binding_type to Nova when plugging takes place,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Neutron ML2 Blueprints

2014-07-10 Thread Mike Scherbakov
We had a call between Andrew (@xarses), Vladimir Kuklin (@aglarendil) and myself (@mihgen) today to finally sort out Neutron ML2 integration in Fuel. We didn't have @xenolog on the call, but hopefully he is more or less fine with all below, and kindly request him to confirm :) Discussed following

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal to add Jon Paul Sullivan and Alexis Lee to core review team

2014-07-10 Thread Macdonald-Wallace, Matthew
+1 from me. Matt -Original Message- From: Clint Byrum [mailto:cl...@fewbar.com] Sent: 09 July 2014 16:52 To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal to add Jon Paul Sullivan and Alexis Lee to core review team Hello! I've been looking at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Trove] Postgresql Anyone working on DBaaS?

2014-07-10 Thread Mark Kirkwood
Thanks Denis, will do! On 10/07/14 19:23, Denis Makogon wrote: Hello Mark. There are several patches for Postgresql are hanging at the review queue. Here's useful link: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/trove/+spec/postgresql-support Contact point: Kevin Conway (you can ping him in IRC and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][third-party] Simple and robust CI script?

2014-07-10 Thread Luke Gorrie
On 10 July 2014 10:06, Luke Gorrie l...@snabb.co wrote: The main new feature now is to automatically retrigger events that neither definitely succeed (exit status 100) nor definitely fail (exit status 101). In this case the CI will vote 0 with the logs and then automatically schedule a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel-Dev] HA CI in master is broken

2014-07-10 Thread Mike Scherbakov
As far as I know, Fuel CI for Fuel Library (deployments on CentOS simple Ubuntu HA) is fixed now. For example, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103947/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103642/ passed CI hour or two ago. However, there are still some issues in Ubuntu HA deployments on 1

[openstack-dev] [all] Treating notifications as a contract

2014-07-10 Thread Eoghan Glynn
TL;DR: do we need to stabilize notifications behind a versioned and discoverable contract? Folks, One of the issues that has been raised in the recent discussions with the QA team about branchless Tempest relates to some legacy defects in the OpenStack notification system. Now, I don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal to add Jon Paul Sullivan and Alexis Lee to core review team

2014-07-10 Thread Chris Jones
Hi +1 Cheers, -- Chris Jones On 9 Jul 2014, at 16:52, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Hello! I've been looking at the statistics, and doing a bit of review of the reviewers, and I think we have an opportunity to expand the core reviewer team in TripleO. We absolutely need the help,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel-Dev] HA CI in master is broken

2014-07-10 Thread Vladimir Kuklin
Confirmed. Also, if you do not want to wait, just rebase your change or cherry-pick it to the same branch. It could overload CI a bit because it will retrigger all the CI tests, so if you have only one test that was failing consider poking devops guys in #fuel-dev first. On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Please help to review the proposal https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105367/

2014-07-10 Thread Jian Hua Geng
Hi All, Please help to review this proposal and give me your comments. Thanks a lot. -- Best regard, David Geng --___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Gantt] Scheduler split status (updated)

2014-07-10 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi all, === tl;dr: Now that we agree on waiting for the split prereqs to be done, we debate on if ResourceTracker should be part of the scheduler code and consequently Scheduler should expose ResourceTracker APIs so that Nova wouldn't own compute nodes resources. I'm proposing to first come with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QA] Enabling full neutron Job

2014-07-10 Thread Salvatore Orlando
The patch for bug 1329564 [1] merged about 11 hours ago. From [2] it seems there has been an improvement on the failure rate, which seem to have dropped to 25% from over 40%. Still, since the patch merged there have been 11 failures already in the full job out of 42 jobs executed in total. Of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] top gate bug is libvirt snapshot

2014-07-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:23:27PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: The libvirt logs needed are huge, so we can't run them all the time. And realistically, I don't think they provided us the info we needed. There has been at least one fail on Dan's log hack patch for this scenario today, so maybe it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Please help to review the proposal https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105367/

2014-07-10 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 07/10/2014 10:58 AM, Jian Hua Geng wrote: Hi All, Please help to review this proposal and give me your comments. Thanks a lot. Hi David, Please don't send review requests to the list. For details see: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html Andreas

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal to add Jon Paul Sullivan and Alexis Lee to core review team

2014-07-10 Thread Jiří Stránský
On 9.7.2014 17:52, Clint Byrum wrote: So, I propose that we add jonpaul-sullivan and lxsli to the TripleO core reviewer team. +1 Jirka ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

[openstack-dev] [neutron] respawn/action neutron-*-agent dying childs.

2014-07-10 Thread Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo
Eugene ( list) I just saw that you reassigned the bug to yourself recently , and that the ideas described in the bug differ a bit from the idea that I had, but I'd be willing to extend my spec to incorporate your design and spend some time in the problem if you believe it's feasible. I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][all] switch from mysqldb to another eventlet aware mysql client

2014-07-10 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/07/14 08:09, Angus Lees wrote: On 10 July 2014 00:59, Roman Podoliaka rpodoly...@mirantis.com wrote: Not sure what issues you are talking about, but I just replaced mysql with mysql+mysqlconnector in my db connection string in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QA] Enabling full neutron Job

2014-07-10 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/07/14 11:07, Salvatore Orlando wrote: The patch for bug 1329564 [1] merged about 11 hours ago. From [2] it seems there has been an improvement on the failure rate, which seem to have dropped to 25% from over 40%. Still, since the patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal to add Jon Paul Sullivan and Alexis Lee to core review team

2014-07-10 Thread jang
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Clint Byrum wrote: So, I propose that we add jonpaul-sullivan and lxsli to the TripleO core reviewer team. Obviously I should declare an interest, but I think this'd be good. +1 jan -- Just because I have nothing to hide doesn't mean I have nothing to fear.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] stevedore plugins (and wait conditions)

2014-07-10 Thread Steven Hardy
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:33:26PM +, Randall Burt wrote: On Jul 9, 2014, at 4:38 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/07/14 17:17, Steven Hardy wrote: Regarding forcing deployers to make a one-time decision, I have a question re cost (money and performance) of the Swift

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][QA] Enabling full neutron Job

2014-07-10 Thread Salvatore Orlando
On 10 July 2014 11:27, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/07/14 11:07, Salvatore Orlando wrote: The patch for bug 1329564 [1] merged about 11 hours ago. From [2] it seems there has been an improvement on the failure rate, which

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][third-party] Simple and robust CI script?

2014-07-10 Thread Kevin Benton
If I understand correctly, you are having it comment when there is a retrigger due to an internal CI failure? If so, please don't do this because it makes the Gerrit reviews very noisy and it provides nothing relevant to the contributor submitting the patch. Nobody wants a CI to report that it

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][third-party] Simple and robust CI script?

2014-07-10 Thread Kevin Benton
For log storage I would definitely start with compression since these are just plain text. Make sure you enable gzip decompression in your web server software so people can still view the log files in their browser. Before spending tons of disk space on log storage, I would also have it purge

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-10 Thread Yuriy Taraday
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Yuriy Taraday's message of 2014-07-09 03:36:00 -0700: On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: I think clints response was likely better than what I can write here, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][third-party] Simple and robust CI script?

2014-07-10 Thread Luke Gorrie
Hi again Jon Paul, My mistake! This seems to be exactly what I was looking for, thank you. (I goofed the query which is why I thought it was lacking.) Cheers :) -Luke On 10 July 2014 09:17, Luke Gorrie l...@snabb.co wrote: On 9 July 2014 20:24, Sullivan, Jon Paul jonpaul.sulli...@hp.com

[openstack-dev] [qa] [rfc] move scenario tests to tempest client

2014-07-10 Thread Sean Dague
As I've been staring at failures in the gate a lot over the past month, we've managed to increasingly tune the tempest client for readability and debugability. So when something fails in an API test, pin pointing it's failure point is getting easier. The scenario tests... not so much. Using the

Re: [openstack-dev] Where should a test for eventlet and oslo.db interaction go?

2014-07-10 Thread Victor Sergeyev
Hello Angus! IMO, the simple answer on your question is - tests for eventlet and oslo.db interaction should be in the same place, where eventlet and oslo.db interact. :) A little digression - we suppose, that oslo.db should neither know, nor take care whether target projects use

Re: [openstack-dev] Where should a test for eventlet and oslo.db interaction go?

2014-07-10 Thread Sean Dague
Honestly, that seems weird to me. oslo.db is built as a common layer for OpenStack services. eventlet is used by most OpenStack services. There are lots of known issues with eventlet vs. our db access patterns. Knowing that the db layer works in the common OpenStack pattern seems really

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Treating notifications as a contract

2014-07-10 Thread Julien Danjou
On Thu, Jul 10 2014, Eoghan Glynn wrote: Hi Eoghan, So the purpose of this thread is simply to get a read on the appetite in the community for such an effort. At the least it would require: * trashing out the details in say a cross-project-track session at the K* summit * buy-in from

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal to add Jon Paul Sullivan and Alexis Lee to core review team

2014-07-10 Thread Tomas Sedovic
On 09/07/14 17:52, Clint Byrum wrote: Hello! I've been looking at the statistics, and doing a bit of review of the reviewers, and I think we have an opportunity to expand the core reviewer team in TripleO. We absolutely need the help, and I think these two individuals are well positioned to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] top gate bug is libvirt snapshot

2014-07-10 Thread Sean Dague
On 07/10/2014 05:03 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 06:23:27PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: The libvirt logs needed are huge, so we can't run them all the time. And realistically, I don't think they provided us the info we needed. There has been at least one fail on Dan's log

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][all] Branchless Tempest beyond pure-API tests, impact on backporting policy

2014-07-10 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Note that the notifications that capture these resource state transitions are a long-standing mechanism in openstack that ceilometer has depended on from the very outset. I don't think it's realistic to envisage these interactions will be replaced by REST APIs any time soon. I wasn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-10 Thread Victor Stinner
Le jeudi 10 juillet 2014, 14:48:04 Yuriy Taraday a écrit : I'm not suggesting that taskflow is useless and asyncio is better (apple vs oranges). I'm saying that using coroutines (asyncio) can improve ways we can use taskflow and provide clearer method of developing these flows. This was mostly

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal to add Jon Paul Sullivan and Alexis Lee to core review team

2014-07-10 Thread Alexis Lee
Tomas Sedovic said on Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 02:26:06PM +0200: On 09/07/14 17:52, Clint Byrum wrote: +1 for both. However, some of the reviews show what I think is a worrying trend in TripleO core. Specifically, nitpicking and tendency to bikeshed. Hi Tomas, thanks for your +1 and thoughts.

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [rfc] move scenario tests to tempest client

2014-07-10 Thread Frittoli, Andrea (HP Cloud)
++ The ugly monkey patch approach is still working fine for my downstream testing, but that's something I'd be happy to get rid of. Something that may be worth considering is to have an abstraction layer on top of tempest clients, to allow switching the actual implementation below: - REST

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2] Support dpdk ovs with ml2 plugin

2014-07-10 Thread Kyle Mestery
I'd recommend adding this to the weekly Neutron ML2 meeting agenda [1] and discussing it there. The ML2 sub-team leads (rkukura and Sukhdev) are both at the Neutron mid-cycle meeting this week, so I'd suggest next week's meeting. Thanks! Kyle [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ML2 On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] handling drivers that will not be third-party tested

2014-07-10 Thread Dan Prince
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 17:03 -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote: I'd like to bring up the topic of drivers which, for one reason or another, are probably never going to have third party CI testing. Take for example the iBoot driver proposed here: https://review.openstack.org/50977 I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Containers] Nova virt driver requirements

2014-07-10 Thread Dmitry Guryanov
On Monday 07 July 2014 16:11:21 Joe Gordon wrote: On Jul 3, 2014 11:43 AM, Dmitry Guryanov dgurya...@parallels.com wrote: Hi, All! As far as I know, there are some requirements, which virt driver must meet to use Openstack 'label'. For example, it's not allowed to mount cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Proposal: FairShareScheduler.

2014-07-10 Thread Lisa
Hi Joe, we know the Amazon's hot market is based on a economic model. Suppose to assign to each group a virtual money amount for renting hot instances. So, the money may reflect the share concept in our model. This means that a big money amount may rent potentially more resources (actually it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Containers] Nova virt driver requirements

2014-07-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:36:59PM +0400, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: I have a question about mounts - in OpenVZ project each container has its own filesystem in an image file. So to start a container we mount this filesystem in host OS (because all containers share the same linux kernel). Is it a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Gantt] Scheduler split status (updated)

2014-07-10 Thread Russell Bryant
On 07/10/2014 05:06 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Hi all, === tl;dr: Now that we agree on waiting for the split prereqs to be done, we debate on if ResourceTracker should be part of the scheduler code and consequently Scheduler should expose ResourceTracker APIs so that Nova wouldn't own

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][all] Branchless Tempest beyond pure-API tests, impact on backporting policy

2014-07-10 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:37:40AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote: Note that the notifications that capture these resource state transitions are a long-standing mechanism in openstack that ceilometer has depended on from the very outset. I don't think it's realistic to envisage these

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Proposal: FairShareScheduler.

2014-07-10 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi Lisa, Le 10/07/2014 15:40, Lisa a écrit : Hi Joe, we know the Amazon's hot market is based on a economic model. Suppose to assign to each group a virtual money amount for renting hot instances. So, the money may reflect the share concept in our model. This means that a big money amount

Re: [openstack-dev] [Containers] Nova virt driver requirements

2014-07-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:57:46PM +0400, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: On Tuesday 08 July 2014 14:10:25 Michael Still wrote: Joe has a good answer, but you should also be aware of the hypervisor support matrix (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HypervisorSupportMatrix), which hopefully comes some

Re: [openstack-dev] [Containers] Nova virt driver requirements

2014-07-10 Thread Dmitry Guryanov
On Thursday 10 July 2014 14:47:11 Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:36:59PM +0400, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: I have a question about mounts - in OpenVZ project each container has its own filesystem in an image file. So to start a container we mount this filesystem in host OS

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] stevedore plugins (and wait conditions)

2014-07-10 Thread Zane Bitter
On 10/07/14 05:34, Steven Hardy wrote: The other approach is to set up a new container, owned by the user, every time. In that case, a provider selecting this implementation would need to make it clear to customers if they would be billed for a WaitCondition resource. I'd prefer to avoid

Re: [openstack-dev] [Containers] Nova virt driver requirements

2014-07-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 06:18:52PM +0400, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: On Thursday 10 July 2014 14:47:11 Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:36:59PM +0400, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: I have a question about mounts - in OpenVZ project each container has its own filesystem in an

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Treating notifications as a contract

2014-07-10 Thread Sandy Walsh
On 7/10/2014 5:52 AM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: TL;DR: do we need to stabilize notifications behind a versioned and discoverable contract? Thanks for dusting this off. Versioning and published schemas for notifications are important to the StackTach team. It would be nice to get this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Gantt] Scheduler split status (updated)

2014-07-10 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Active discussion at the gantt meeting this week, check out the log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-07-01-15.00.log.html -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 -Original Message- From: Russell Bryant

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][all] Branchless Tempest beyond pure-API tests, impact on backporting policy

2014-07-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Hi! There is a lot of useful information in that post (even excluding the part brainstorming solutions) and it would be a shame if it was lost in a sub-thread. Do you plan to make a blog post, or reference wiki page, out of this ? Back to the content, I think a more layered testing approach (as

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][all] Branchless Tempest beyond pure-API tests, impact on backporting policy

2014-07-10 Thread David Kranz
On 07/10/2014 08:53 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:37:40AM -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote: Note that the notifications that capture these resource state transitions are a long-standing mechanism in openstack that ceilometer has depended on from the very outset. I don't think

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Treating notifications as a contract

2014-07-10 Thread Chris Dent
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Julien Danjou wrote: My initial plan was to leverage a library like voluptuous to do schema based validation on the sender side. That would allow for receiver to introspect schema and know the data structure to expect. I didn't think deeply on how to handle versioning, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Gantt] Scheduler split status (updated)

2014-07-10 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 10/07/2014 16:32, Dugger, Donald D a écrit : Active discussion at the gantt meeting this week, check out the log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-07-01-15.00.log.html I would prefer to mention this week's meeting :

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][all] Branchless Tempest beyond pure-API tests, impact on backporting policy

2014-07-10 Thread David Kranz
On 07/10/2014 09:47 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi! There is a lot of useful information in that post (even excluding the part brainstorming solutions) and it would be a shame if it was lost in a sub-thread. Do you plan to make a blog post, or reference wiki page, out of this ? Back to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Containers] Nova virt driver requirements

2014-07-10 Thread James Bottomley
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 14:47 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:36:59PM +0400, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: I have a question about mounts - in OpenVZ project each container has its own filesystem in an image file. So to start a container we mount this filesystem

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2] Support dpdk ovs with ml2 plugin

2014-07-10 Thread Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw
Hi, Thanks for Your answers. Yep using binding:vif_details makes more sense. We would like to reuse VIF_TYPE_OVS and modify the nova to use the userspace vhost when ‘use_dpdk’ flag is present. What we are missing is how to inform the ml2 plugin/mechanism drivers when to put that ‘use_dpdk’

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-10 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Victor Stinner's message of 2014-07-10 05:57:38 -0700: Le jeudi 10 juillet 2014, 14:48:04 Yuriy Taraday a écrit : I'm not suggesting that taskflow is useless and asyncio is better (apple vs oranges). I'm saying that using coroutines (asyncio) can improve ways we can use

Re: [openstack-dev] Inter cloud resource federation [Alliance]

2014-07-10 Thread Tiwari, Arvind
Hi Raildo, Yes, I am trying to separate out the resource federation concerns through Alliance, Identity federation will be intact with Keystone. At the same time Alliance will play as delegate for keystone wherever resource federation across clouds concern need to be addressed. I would love to

Re: [openstack-dev] Inter cloud resource federation [Alliance]

2014-07-10 Thread Tiwari, Arvind
Hi Matt, It is not about identity federation (which is handled in Keystone), this is about resource federation across clouds, Nova resources are one of them. I don't know much about Nova cells right now, I will try to understand it soon. Thanks, Arvind -Original Message- From: Matt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Shim vs Agent Refactor

2014-07-10 Thread Stephen Balukoff
Per the IRC discussion this morning, I believe it was decided that we would prioritize creating a v2 agent which should run in parallel with the v1 agent. Further, for any subsequent driver shim layer, this should happen after the v2 agent is functional. ... or I may have misunderstood what was

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2] Support dpdk ovs with ml2 plugin

2014-07-10 Thread Czesnowicz, Przemyslaw
Great, I added this subject to next meetings agenda. Regards Przemek -Original Message- From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@noironetworks.com] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 2:32 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: Mooney, Sean K Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Containers] Nova virt driver requirements

2014-07-10 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 08:19:36AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote: On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 14:47 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 05:36:59PM +0400, Dmitry Guryanov wrote: I have a question about mounts - in OpenVZ project each container has its own filesystem in

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [rfc] move scenario tests to tempest client

2014-07-10 Thread David Kranz
On 07/10/2014 08:08 AM, Frittoli, Andrea (HP Cloud) wrote: ++ The ugly monkey patch approach is still working fine for my downstream testing, but that's something I'd be happy to get rid of. Something that may be worth considering is to have an abstraction layer on top of tempest clients, to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]Performance of security group

2014-07-10 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:30 AM, shihanzhang ayshihanzh...@126.com wrote: With the deployment 'nova + neutron + openvswitch', when we bulk create about 500 VM with a default security group, the CPU usage of neutron-server and openvswitch agent is very high, especially the CPU usage of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Gantt] Scheduler split status (updated)

2014-07-10 Thread Dugger, Donald D
I blame MicroSoft, cut/paste didn't work so I had to manually type in the (wrong) URL. -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 -Original Message- From: Sylvain Bauza [mailto:sba...@redhat.com] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:05 AM To:

[openstack-dev] [nova] tox.ini ignores are TODOs?

2014-07-10 Thread Moore, Ryan
Hi tox.ini has the line # The rest of the ignores are TODOs How serious are we about getting rid of these ignores? Is it valid to -1 a patch that does not pass an ignored rule? E.g. E121 indentation is not a multiple of four If a patch is submitted that does not pass a currently ignored rule,

[openstack-dev] [nova][vmware] Convert to rescue by adding the rescue image and booting from it

2014-07-10 Thread Matthew Booth
Currently we create a rescue instance by creating a new VM with the original instance's image, then adding the original instance's first disk to it, and booting. This means we have 2 VMs, which we need to be careful of when cleaning up. Also when suspending, and probably other edge cases. We also

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][all] Branchless Tempest beyond pure-API tests, impact on backporting policy

2014-07-10 Thread Sean Dague
On 07/10/2014 09:48 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote: On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 09:16:01AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: I think we need to actually step back a little and figure out where we are, how we got here, and what the future of validation might need to look like in OpenStack. Because I think there

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fastest way to run individual tests ?

2014-07-10 Thread Mike Bayer
On 7/9/14, 4:51 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 6/12/2014 6:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 07:07:37AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 06/12/2014 06:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: Does anyone have any tip on how to actually run individual tests in an efficient manner.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fastest way to run individual tests ?

2014-07-10 Thread Chris Dent
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Mike Bayer wrote: I typically never use tox or testtools at the commandline until I'm ready to commit and want to see what the jenkins builds will see. I start up the whole thing and then it's time to take a break while it reinvents the whole world. Me tool I've been

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Gantt] Scheduler split status (updated)

2014-07-10 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 10/07/2014 15:47, Russell Bryant a écrit : On 07/10/2014 05:06 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Hi all, === tl;dr: Now that we agree on waiting for the split prereqs to be done, we debate on if ResourceTracker should be part of the scheduler code and consequently Scheduler should expose

Re: [openstack-dev] What projects need help?

2014-07-10 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-07-08 20:31:26 -0600 (-0600), Brian Jarrett wrote: [...] Are there any projects that could use more developers? [...] That's a more complex question than you might think. On the whole OpenStack does not need more developers writing new features. What we *are* in desperate need of is

Re: [openstack-dev] Where should a test for eventlet and oslo.db interaction go?

2014-07-10 Thread Mike Bayer
On 7/10/14, 7:47 AM, Sean Dague wrote: Honestly, that seems weird to me. oslo.db is built as a common layer for OpenStack services. eventlet is used by most OpenStack services. There are lots of known issues with eventlet vs. our db access patterns. Knowing that the db layer works in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Sahara] Error config?

2014-07-10 Thread Dat Tran
Thank Matt and Trevor, Sorry everybody! Because i begin to learning+alone. So, difficulty in check log and fix error. matt -- I receive error when create some node group templates for the master and worker nodes. Then, i install sahara UI and already running test. Thank you very much! Best,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] tox.ini ignores are TODOs?

2014-07-10 Thread Sean Dague
On 07/10/2014 11:46 AM, Moore, Ryan wrote: Hi tox.ini has the line # The rest of the ignores are TODOs How serious are we about getting rid of these ignores? Is it valid to -1 a patch that does not pass an ignored rule? E.g. E121 indentation is not a multiple of four

Re: [openstack-dev] Inter cloud resource federation [Alliance]

2014-07-10 Thread Raildo Mascena
Hi Arvind, Now it's clear to me. It will be a pleasure for me and my team help you. I'll be awaiting to see the POC. Regards, 2014-07-10 12:36 GMT-03:00 Tiwari, Arvind arvind.tiw...@hp.com: Hi Matt, It is not about identity federation (which is handled in Keystone), this is about

Re: [openstack-dev] What projects need help?

2014-07-10 Thread Thierry Carrez
Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-07-08 20:31:26 -0600 (-0600), Brian Jarrett wrote: [...] Are there any projects that could use more developers? [...] That's a more complex question than you might think. On the whole OpenStack does not need more developers writing new features. What we *are*

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] fastest way to run individual tests ?

2014-07-10 Thread Mike Bayer
On 7/10/14, 12:08 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On Thu, 10 Jul 2014, Mike Bayer wrote: I typically never use tox or testtools at the commandline until I'm ready to commit and want to see what the jenkins builds will see. I start up the whole thing and then it's time to take a break while it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Shim vs Agent Refactor

2014-07-10 Thread Samuel Bercovici
This is also my understanding. From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 6:30 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Shim vs Agent Refactor Per the IRC discussion this morning, I

Re: [openstack-dev] What projects need help?

2014-07-10 Thread Denis Makogon
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2014-07-08 20:31:26 -0600 (-0600), Brian Jarrett wrote: [...] Are there any projects that could use more developers? [...] That's a more complex question than you might think. On the whole OpenStack does not need

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-10 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 16:27 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey This is an attempt to summarize a really useful discussion that Victor, Flavio and I have been having today. At the bottom are some background links - basically what I have open in my browser right now thinking through all of

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-10 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 12:48 +0200, Nikola Đipanov wrote: When I read all of this stuff and got my head around it (took some time :) ), a glaring drawback of such an approach, and as I mentioned on the spec proposing it [1] is that we would not really doing asyncio, we would just be pretending

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Nominating Nathan Reller for barbican-core

2014-07-10 Thread Douglas Mendizabal
Hi Everyone, I would also like to nominate Nathan Reller for the barbican-core team. Nathan has been involved with the Key Management effort since early 2013. Recently, Nate has been driving the development of a KMIP backend for Barbican, which will enable Barbican to be used with KMIP devices.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] oslo.messaging 1.4.0.0a3 released

2014-07-10 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 03:53 +, Paul Michali (pcm) wrote: Mark, What is the status of adding the newer oslo.messaging releases to global requirements? I had tried to get 1.4.0.0a2 added to requirements (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103536/), but it was failing Jenkins. Wondering

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Shim vs Agent Refactor

2014-07-10 Thread Doug Wiegley
Modified slightly, my read on the decision was: * Create a v2 agent, and make the ref haproxy driver use the v2 agent and v2 obj model. * At a lower priority, work on a shim for non-agent older drivers. This is de-coupled from the haproxy ref driver, and could happen in parallel if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Treating notifications as a contract

2014-07-10 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 04:48 -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote: TL;DR: do we need to stabilize notifications behind a versioned and discoverable contract? Folks, One of the issues that has been raised in the recent discussions with the QA team about branchless Tempest relates to some legacy

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Treating notifications as a contract

2014-07-10 Thread Matt Dietz
-Original Message- From: Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: Thursday, July 10, 2014 at 9:31 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Shim vs Agent Refactor

2014-07-10 Thread Samuel Bercovici
New/updated v2 driver could be done without an agent (same as was possible in v1). From: Doug Wiegley [mailto:do...@a10networks.com] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 8:06 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Shim vs Agent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Shim vs Agent Refactor

2014-07-10 Thread Doug Wiegley
Absolutely, and work on those can start immediately, for any vendor that wants to update their driver. I’d recommend using the driver base class in this review, which modifies the current new one, based on some stuff that Brandon found: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105610 Thanks, Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Shim vs Agent Refactor

2014-07-10 Thread Dustin Lundquist
Samuel, I've heard this mentioned before, but looking at the code the haproxy namespace driver uses the agent driver interface rather the the abstract driver interface. Are you sure the HAProxy driver can be used without the agent, if so could you explain how? Thanks, Dustin Lundquist On

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Treating notifications as a contract

2014-07-10 Thread Daniel Dyer
From my perspective, the requirement is to be able to have a consistent and predictable format for notifications that are being sent from all services. This means: 1. a set of required fields that all events contain and have consistent meaning 2. a set of optional fields, you don’t have to

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Nominating Nathan Reller for barbican-core

2014-07-10 Thread Paul Kehrer
+1 On Jul 10, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Douglas Mendizabal douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.commailto:douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi Everyone, I would also like to nominate Nathan Reller for the barbican-core team. Nathan has been involved with the Key Management effort since early 2013.

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Nominating Ade Lee for barbican-core

2014-07-10 Thread Paul Kehrer
+1 On Jul 10, 2014, at 11:55 AM, Douglas Mendizabal douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.commailto:douglas.mendiza...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi Everyone, I would like to nominate Ade Lee for the barbican-core team. Ade has been involved in the development of Barbican since January of this year, and

  1   2   >