[openstack-dev] [Devstack] [Cinder] Registering 3rd party driver as default

2014-08-14 Thread Amit Das
Hi folks, I have been trying to run devstack with my cinder driver as the default volume_driver but with no luck. Devstack seems to register the lvm driver as the default always. I have tried below approaches: 1. directly modifying the /etc/cinder/cinder.conf file 2. creating a driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Add a pollster plugin

2014-08-14 Thread Duan, Li-Gong (Gary@HPServers-Core-OE-PSC)
Thanks a lot, Doug. It does work after configuring pipeline.yaml. Regards, Gary On Aug 12, 2014, at 4:11 AM, Duan, Li-Gong (Gary at HPServers-Core-OE-PSChttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev) li-gong.duan at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] Mistral milestone 0.1 blueprint review

2014-08-14 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Thanks, Dmitri, I left my comments in the document you shared. Please take a loot at them. We also need to define a reasonable date for 0.1 release which is now set to Sept 11 according to my very raw estimates. We may want to move it a little bit. Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc. On 14 Aug

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API meeting

2014-08-14 Thread Christopher Yeoh
Hi, Just a reminder that the weekly Nova API meeting is being held tomorrow Friday UTC . We encourage cloud operators and those who use the REST API such as SDK developers and others who and are interested in the future of the API to participate. In other timezones the meeting is at: EST

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

2014-08-14 Thread Boring, Walter
Hey guys, I wanted to pose a nomination for Cinder core. Xing Yang. She has been active in the cinder community for many releases and has worked on several drivers as well as other features for cinder itself. She has been doing an awesome job doing reviews and helping folks out in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Simple proposal for stabilizing new features in-tree

2014-08-14 Thread Sridar Kandaswamy (skandasw)
Hi Aaron: There is a certain fear of another cascading chain of emails so with hesitation i send this email out. :-) 1) I could not agree with u more on the issue with the logs and the pain with debugging issues here. Yes for sure bugs do keep popping up but often times, (speaking for

[openstack-dev] [heat] heat docker multi host scheduling support

2014-08-14 Thread Malawade, Abhijeet
Hi all, I am trying to use heat to create docker containers. I have configured heat-docker plugin. I am also able to create stack using heat successfully. To start container on different host we need to provide 'docker_endpoint' in template. For this we have to provide host address where

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Concerns around the Extensible Resource Tracker design - revert maybe?

2014-08-14 Thread Nikola Đipanov
On 08/13/2014 06:05 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: Le 13/08/2014 12:21, Sylvain Bauza a écrit : Le 12/08/2014 22:06, Sylvain Bauza a écrit : Le 12/08/2014 18:54, Nikola Đipanov a écrit : On 08/12/2014 04:49 PM, Sylvain Bauza wrote: (sorry for reposting, missed 2 links...) Hi Nikola, Le

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-14 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 18:52:05 -0400 Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/13/2014 06:35 PM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/13/2014 06:23 PM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 12:05 -0700, James E. Blair wrote: cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: Sean Dague

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Simple proposal for stabilizing new features in-tree

2014-08-14 Thread Wuhongning
FWaas can't seamlessly work with DVR yet. A BP [1] has been submitted, but it can only handle NS traffic, leaving W-E untouched. If we implement the WE firewall in DVR, the iptable might be applied at a per port basis, so there are some overlapping with SG (Can we image a packet run into

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Mech driver as out-of-tree add-on

2014-08-14 Thread Mathieu Rohon
Hi, I would like to add that it would be harder for the community to help maintaining drivers. such a work [1] wouldn't have occured with an out of tree ODL driver. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96459/ On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Robert Kukura kuk...@noironetworks.com wrote: One

[openstack-dev] [nova][rally] nova-network, unable to associate floating ip

2014-08-14 Thread Li Tianqing
Hello, Recently we use rally to test our cloud. We run boot-run-commnd-delete task. The configuration is this: { VMTasks.boot_runcommand_delete: [ { args: { flavor: { name: m1.small }, image: {

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:24:36AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: I'm not questioning the value of f2f - I'm questioning the idea of doing f2f meetings sooo many times a year. OpenStack is very much the outlier here among

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-08-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:05:27PM -0700, James E. Blair wrote: cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: Sean Dague s...@dague.net writes: This has all gone far enough that someone actually wrote a Grease Monkey script to purge all the 3rd Party CI content out of Jenkins UI. People

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-14 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Letting the industry field-test a project and feed their experience back into the community is a slow process, but that is the best measure of a project's success. I seem to recall this being an implicit expectation a few years ago, but haven't seen it discussed in a while. I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Retrospective veto revert policy

2014-08-14 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 15:56 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey (Terrible name for a policy, I know) From the version_cap saga here: https://review.openstack.org/110754 I think we need a better understanding of how to approach situations like this. Here's my attempt at documenting

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Retrospective veto revert policy

2014-08-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:06:13AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 15:56 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey (Terrible name for a policy, I know) From the version_cap saga here: https://review.openstack.org/110754 I think we need a better understanding of

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Error: Node Not Found

2014-08-14 Thread Peeyush Gupta
Hi all, I have successfully done a tripleo setup using RDO instack in  a virtual machine environment. Now, I deleted the overcloud and  I am trying to add a physical node to the setup, but I get the error as the setup has failed.  Here are the nova logs: 2014-08-14 04:55:02.449 2208 WARNING

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Is network ordering of vNICs guaranteed?

2014-08-14 Thread Aaron Rosen
Most guests generate this on first boot. I haven't looked into how newer versions of ubuntu handle this though I noticed in 14.04 this file doesn't exist anymore but I figure it's doing it somewhere else. Aaron On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Jian Wen wenjia...@gmail.com wrote: Ordering of

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] 3'rd party CI systems

2014-08-14 Thread David Pineau
Well, I could make it test every patchset, but then I have to look into how to limit at one build per time + queue the other builds. (didn't try that yet) Anyways, I just got my new CI machine so I'll be able to finalize the CI system relatively soon. 2014-08-14 1:01 GMT+02:00 Jeremy Stanley

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Which changes need accompanying bugs?

2014-08-14 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 14/08/14 02:43, Angus Lees wrote: On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:11:51 AM Kevin Benton wrote: Is the pylint static analysis that caught that error prone to false positives? If not, I agree that it would be really nice if that were made part of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Retrospective veto revert policy

2014-08-14 Thread Nikola Đipanov
On 08/14/2014 11:11 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:06:13AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 15:56 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey (Terrible name for a policy, I know) From the version_cap saga here: https://review.openstack.org/110754 I

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Mech driver as out-of-tree add-on

2014-08-14 Thread loy wolfe
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Mathieu Rohon mathieu.ro...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I would like to add that it would be harder for the community to help maintaining drivers. such a work [1] wouldn't have occured with an out of tree ODL driver. +1. It's better to move all MD for none

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Which changes need accompanying bugs?

2014-08-14 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 08/14/2014 11:37 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: On 14/08/14 02:43, Angus Lees wrote: On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:11:51 AM Kevin Benton wrote: Is the pylint static analysis that caught that error prone to false positives? If not, I agree that it would be really nice if that were made part of the tox

[openstack-dev] [Congress] Help in understanding API Flow

2014-08-14 Thread Madhu Mohan
Hi, Can some one help me understand how an API is exposed to the clients from Congress server ? I see that a cage service ('api-policy') is created in congress_server.py. I believe this is implemented in policy_model. I tried to send a json_request from my client on the server. I tried sending

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Third Party CI naming and contact (action required)

2014-08-14 Thread Franck Yelles
Hi James, I have added the Nuage CI system to the list; I also took the liberty to reorder alphabetically the list Franck Franck On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:23 AM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: Hi, We've updated the registration requirements for third-party CI systems here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] gate-ceilometer-python33 failed because of wrong setup.py in happybase

2014-08-14 Thread Dina Belova
Hisashi Osanai, np :) You're welcome :) On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Osanai, Hisashi osanai.hisa...@jp.fujitsu.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: Means the py33 needs to execute on stable/icehouse. Here I misunderstand something... Not it does not,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Mech driver as out-of-tree add-on

2014-08-14 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I think there will soon be a discussion regarding what the appropriate location for plugin and drivers should be. My personal feeling is that Neutron has simply reached the tipping point where the high number of drivers and plugins is causing unnecessary load for the core team and frustration for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Retrospective veto revert policy

2014-08-14 Thread Mark McLoughlin
On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 15:56 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey (Terrible name for a policy, I know) From the version_cap saga here: https://review.openstack.org/110754 I think we need a better understanding of how to approach situations like this. Here's my attempt at documenting

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Third Party CI naming and contact (action required)

2014-08-14 Thread trinath.soman...@freescale.com
Hi Franck - Thanks for the update. I too have that re-order in mind. :) Here after CI owners may add their CI names in appropriate alphabetical order. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048 -Original Message- From: Franck Yelles

Re: [openstack-dev] Annoucing CloudKitty : an OpenSource Rating-as-a-Service project for OpenStack

2014-08-14 Thread Fei Long Wang
Glad to see there is another group interested in rating/billing. I'm thinking if I should announce our rating service to join the fun :-) You know, I'm kidding. The more groups join the rating service discussion, the better. But IMHO, we just need one rating service for OpenStack. So let's

[openstack-dev] [vmware] Canonical list of os types

2014-08-14 Thread Matthew Booth
I've just spent the best part of a day tracking down why instance creation was failing on a particular setup. The error message from CreateVM_Task was: 'A specified parameter was not correct'. After discounting a great many possibilities, I finally discovered that the problem was guestId, which

Re: [openstack-dev] [Devstack] [Cinder] Registering 3rd party driver as default

2014-08-14 Thread Amit Das
With further debugging, i find that none of the configuration options present in /etc/cinder/cinder.conf are getting applied. Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/ On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com wrote: Hi folks, I have been trying to run

Re: [openstack-dev] [vmware] Canonical list of os types

2014-08-14 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - From: Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org I've just spent the best part of a day tracking down why instance creation was failing on a particular setup. The error

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][cisco] Cisco Nexus requires patched ncclient

2014-08-14 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 FYI: I've uploaded a review for openstack/requirements to add the upstream module into the list of potential dependencies [1]. Once it's merged, I'm going to introduce this new requirement for Neutron. [1]: https://review.openstack.org/114213

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Russell Bryant
On 08/13/2014 07:27 PM, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:44 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/13/2014 01:09 PM, Dan Smith wrote: Expecting cores to be at these sorts of things seems pretty reasonable to me, given the usefulness (and gravity) of the discussions

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Russell Bryant
On 08/13/2014 11:31 PM, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Just wanted to quickly weigh in with my thoughts on this important topic. I very much valued the face-to-face interaction that came from the mid-cycle meetup in Beaverton (it was

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Russell Bryant
On 08/13/2014 07:27 PM, Michael Still wrote: The etherpad for the meetup has extensive notes. Any summary I write will basically be those notes in prose. What are you looking for in a summary that isn't in the etherpad? There also wasn't a summary of the Icehouse midcycle produced that I can

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Docker] Run OpenStack Service in Docker Container

2014-08-14 Thread Jay Lau
I see a few mentions of OpenStack services themselves being containerized in Docker. Is this a serious trend in the community? http://allthingsopen.com/2014/02/12/why-containers-for-openstack-services/ -- Thanks, Jay ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] Annoucing CloudKitty : an OpenSource Rating-as-a-Service project for OpenStack

2014-08-14 Thread Sandy Walsh
Sounds very interesting. We're currently collecting detailed (and verified) usage information in StackTach and are keen to see what CloudKitty is able to offer. My one wish is that you keep the components as small pip redistributables with low coupling to promote reuse with other projects. Many

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Mech driver as out-of-tree add-on

2014-08-14 Thread Kyle Mestery
I also feel like the drivers/plugins are currently BEYOND a tipping point, and are in fact dragging down velocity of the core project in many ways. I'm working on a proposal for Kilo where we move all drivers/plugins out of the main Neutron tree and into a separate git repository under the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 08:31:48AM -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/13/2014 11:31 PM, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Just wanted to quickly weigh in with my thoughts on this important topic. I very much valued the face-to-face

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-14 Thread Devananda van der Veen
On Aug 14, 2014 2:04 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Letting the industry field-test a project and feed their experience back into the community is a slow process, but that is the best measure of a project's success. I seem to recall this being an implicit expectation a few

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][DevStack] How to increase developer usage of Neutron

2014-08-14 Thread Mike Spreitzer
I'll bet I am not the only developer who is not highly competent with bridges and tunnels, Open VSwitch, Neutron configuration, and how DevStack transmutes all those. My bet is that you would have more developers using Neutron if there were an easy-to-find and easy-to-follow recipe to use, to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Devstack] [Cinder] Registering 3rd party driver as default

2014-08-14 Thread Kerr, Andrew
You either need to comment out the enabled_backends line, or you'll want to put something similar to this in your cinder.conf file: [DEFAULT] ... enabled_backends = cloudbyte ... [cloudbyte] volume_driver = volume_driver = cinder.volume.drivers.cloudbyte.cloudbyte.ElasticenterISCSIDriver

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][DevStack] How to increase developer usage of Neutron

2014-08-14 Thread CARVER, PAUL
Mike Spreitzer [mailto:mspre...@us.ibm.com] wrote: I'll bet I am not the only developer who is not highly competent with bridges and tunnels, Open VSwitch, Neutron configuration, and how DevStack transmutes all those. My bet is that you would have more developers using Neutron if there were an

[openstack-dev] [neutron] requirements.txt: explicit vs. implicit

2014-08-14 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi all, some plugins depend on modules that are not mentioned in requirements.txt. Among them, Cisco Nexus (ncclient), Brocade (ncclient), Embrane (heleosapi)... Some other plugins put their dependencies in requirements.txt though (like Arista

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-14 Thread Russell Bryant
On 08/14/2014 09:21 AM, Devananda van der Veen wrote: On Aug 14, 2014 2:04 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com mailto:egl...@redhat.com wrote: Letting the industry field-test a project and feed their experience back into the community is a slow process, but that is the best measure

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] heat docker multi host scheduling support

2014-08-14 Thread Zane Bitter
On 14/08/14 03:21, Malawade, Abhijeet wrote: Hi all, I am trying to use heat to create docker containers. I have configured heat-docker plugin. I am also able to create stack using heat successfully. To start container on different host we need to provide 'docker_endpoint' in template. For

Re: [openstack-dev] [Devstack] [Cinder] Registering 3rd party driver as default

2014-08-14 Thread Amit Das
Thanks a lot. This worked out like a charm. Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/ On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Kerr, Andrew andrew.k...@netapp.com wrote: You either need to comment out the enabled_backends line, or you'll want to put something similar to this in your

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread CARVER, PAUL
Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com] wrote: Depending on the usage needs, I think Google hangouts is a quite useful technology. For many-to-many session its limit of 10 participants can be an issue, but for a few-to-many broadcast it could be practical. What I find particularly

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

2014-08-14 Thread Duncan Thomas
+1 On 14 August 2014 00:55, Boring, Walter walter.bor...@hp.com wrote: Hey guys, I wanted to pose a nomination for Cinder core. Xing Yang. She has been active in the cinder community for many releases and has worked on several drivers as well as other features for cinder itself. She

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Russell Bryant
On 08/14/2014 10:04 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com] wrote: Depending on the usage needs, I think Google hangouts is a quite useful technology. For many-to-many session its limit of 10 participants can be an issue, but for a few-to-many broadcast it

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/14/2014 3:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:24:36AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: I'm not questioning the value of f2f - I'm questioning the idea of doing f2f meetings sooo many times a year.

Re: [openstack-dev] use of compute node as a storage

2014-08-14 Thread Jyoti Ranjan
You run cinder-volume on compute node which you want to convert to storage. Configure LVM driver of compute node as storage backend for cinder-volume. On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:54 PM, shailendra acharya acharyashailend...@gmail.com wrote: i made 4 vm 1 controller, 1 network and 2 compute and i

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Sandy Walsh
On 8/14/2014 11:28 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/14/2014 10:04 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com] wrote: Depending on the usage needs, I think Google hangouts is a quite useful technology. For many-to-many session its limit of 10 participants can be an

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Anne Gentle
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote: On 8/14/2014 11:28 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/14/2014 10:04 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com] wrote: Depending on the usage needs, I think Google hangouts is a quite

[openstack-dev] [sahara] team meeting Aug 14 1800 UTC

2014-08-14 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hi folks, We'll be having the Sahara team meeting as usual in #openstack-meeting-alt channel. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SaharaAgenda#Next_meetings http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Sahara+Meetingiso=20140814T18 -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-14 Thread Kyle Mestery
Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests. Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a third-party CI account

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Sandy Walsh sandy.wa...@rackspace.com wrote: On 8/14/2014 11:28 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 08/14/2014 10:04 AM, CARVER, PAUL wrote: Daniel P. Berrange [mailto:berra...@redhat.com] wrote: Depending on the usage needs, I think Google hangouts is a quite

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

2014-08-14 Thread Martin, Kurt Frederick (ESSN Storage MSDU)
+1, Xing is very active in the community, provides valuable reviews and currently developing cinder core features. ~Kurt -Original Message- From: Boring, Walter Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 11:56 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread CARVER, PAUL
Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] wrote: An ideal solution would allow attendees to join as individuals from anywhere. A lot of contributors work from home. Is that sort of thing compatible with your system? In principle, yes, but that loses the immersive telepresence aspect which is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:31 AM, CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com wrote: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com] wrote: An ideal solution would allow attendees to join as individuals from anywhere. A lot of contributors work from home. Is that sort of thing compatible with your system? In

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Russell Bryant
On 08/14/2014 11:40 AM, David Kranz wrote: On 08/14/2014 10:54 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/14/2014 3:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:24:36AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: I'm not questioning

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-14 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
On Aug 13, 2014, at 5:07 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:55:48PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 11:42:52AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 03:56:04AM -0700, Jay Pipes wrote: By ignoring stable branches,

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

2014-08-14 Thread Mike Perez
On 06:55 Thu 14 Aug , Boring, Walter wrote: Hey guys, I wanted to pose a nomination for Cinder core. Xing Yang. She has been active in the cinder community for many releases and has worked on several drivers as well as other features for cinder itself. She has been doing an

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] requirements.txt: explicit vs. implicit

2014-08-14 Thread Ben Nemec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/14/2014 08:37 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi all, some plugins depend on modules that are not mentioned in requirements.txt. Among them, Cisco Nexus (ncclient), Brocade (ncclient), Embrane (heleosapi)... Some other plugins put their

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Way to get wrapped method's name/class using Pecan secure decorators?

2014-08-14 Thread Pendergrass, Eric
Sure, Doug. We want the ability to selectively apply policies to certain Ceilometer API methods based on user/tenant roles. For example, we want to restrict the ability to execute Alarm deletes to admins and user/tenants who have a special role, say domainadmin. The policy file might look like

[openstack-dev] Using gerrymander, a client API and command line tool for gerrit

2014-08-14 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
Over the past couple of months I've worked on creating a python library and command line tool for dealing with gerrit. I've blogged about this a number of times on http://planet.openstack.org, but I figure there are quite a few people who won't be reading the blogs there or easily miss some posts

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] 3'rd party CI systems: Not Whitelisted Volume type with name * could not be found.

2014-08-14 Thread Asselin, Ramy
Hi, Does anyone know how to configure cinder ci tests to not have these errors? 12:32:11 *** Not Whitelisted *** 2014-08-14 12:23:56.179 18021 ERROR cinder.volume.volume_types [req-c9ec92ab-132b-4167-a467-15bd213659e8 bd1f54a867ce47acb4097cd94149efa0 d15dcf4cb3c7495389799ec849e9036d - - -]

Re: [openstack-dev] Is there a way to let nova schedule plugin fetch glance image metadata

2014-08-14 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Indeed, no REST API yet, but that's one of the things we will be considering for Gantt. I wonder if this is yet another argument for Gantt and, if you can wait until the Kilo cycle, maybe we can provide an appropriate service for Heat. -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D.

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Third Party CI naming and contact (action required)

2014-08-14 Thread Lucas Eznarriaga
Hi, Midokura CI should be up to date now too. We have a problem with zuul-merger when the host id of review.openstack.org changes. In this case, the new rsa key has to be added manually otherwise the build will fail with a: Merge Failed. This change was unable to be automatically merged with

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

2014-08-14 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On 06:55 Thu 14 Aug , Boring, Walter wrote: Hey guys, I wanted to pose a nomination for Cinder core. Xing Yang. She has been active in the cinder community for many releases and has worked on several drivers

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Joe Gordon
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:24:36AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: I'm not questioning the value of f2f - I'm questioning the idea of doing f2f

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][DevStack] How to increase developer usage of Neutron

2014-08-14 Thread Mike Spreitzer
CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com wrote on 08/14/2014 09:35:17 AM: Mike Spreitzer [mailto:mspre...@us.ibm.com] wrote: I'll bet I am not the only developer who is not highly competent with bridges and tunnels, Open VSwitch, Neutron configuration, and how DevStack transmutes all those. My bet is

Re: [openstack-dev] Is there a way to let nova schedule plugin fetch glance image metadata

2014-08-14 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Mmm... I can understand that you perhaps need an external scheduler for your own purposes, but I think you can't expect your plugin merged upstream for two reasons : - during Icehouse, there was an effort for not having the scheduler proxying to the compute nodes - Call for scheduler needs to go

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Third Party CI naming and contact (action required)

2014-08-14 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2014-08-14 20:50:21 +0200 (+0200), Lucas Eznarriaga wrote: [...] We have a problem with zuul-merger when the host id of review.openstack.org changes. In this case, the new rsa key has to be added manually [...] If so, you were broken a while... the last (and effectively only in recent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Concerns around the Extensible Resource Tracker design - revert maybe?

2014-08-14 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Hi mikal, Le 14 août 2014 01:49, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com a écrit : So, there's been a lot of email in the last few days and I feel I am not keeping up. Sylvain, can you summarise for me what the plan is here? Can we roll forward or do we need to revert? Well, as we agreed with

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Review priorities as we approach juno-3

2014-08-14 Thread Dan Smith
== Move Virt Drivers to use Objects (Juno Work) == I couldn't actually find any code out for review for this one apart from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94477/, is there more out there? This was an umbrella one to cover a bunch of virt driver objects work done early in the cycle. Much of

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-14 Thread trinath.soman...@freescale.com
Hi- I'm hitting bugs for (basic/advanced)_server_ops testing. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1232303 Kindly help me with a fix to this. Thanking you. -- Trinath Somanchi - B39208 trinath.soman...@freescale.com | extn: 4048 -Original Message- From: Kyle Mestery

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-14 Thread Joe Gordon
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Aug 13, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: At the end of the day, that's probably going to mean saying No to more things. Everytime I turn around everyone wants the TC to say No to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Review priorities as we approach juno-3

2014-08-14 Thread Michael Still
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: == Move Virt Drivers to use Objects (Juno Work) == I couldn't actually find any code out for review for this one apart from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94477/, is there more out there? This was an umbrella one to cover

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 14 août 2014 21:56, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com a écrit : On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:24:36AM +1000, Michael Still wrote: On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: I'm not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] 3'rd party CI systems: Not Whitelisted Volume type with name * could not be found.

2014-08-14 Thread Martin, Kurt Frederick (ESSN Storage MSDU)
Cinder.conf needs to have a default_volume_type entry set under the [Default] group and a volume type that is valid, for example, default_volume_type=bronze. This allows for a volume to be created when a volume type is not selected, the default 'None' type. This feature has been available for

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Which changes need accompanying bugs?

2014-08-14 Thread Maru Newby
On Aug 13, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Is the pylint static analysis that caught that error prone to false positives? If not, I agree that it would be really nice if that were made part of the tox check so these don't have to be fixed after the fact. To me that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] 3'rd party CI systems: Not Whitelisted Volume type with name * could not be found.

2014-08-14 Thread Asselin, Ramy
Both configurations have that set as you described. [1][2] Who actually creates that volume type? Is that supposed to be added manually to local.sh, or is this a bug in devstack? [1] http://publiclogs.emc.com/vnx_ostack/EMC_VNX_FC/212/logs/etc/cinder/cinder.conf.txt.gz [DEFAULT]

[openstack-dev] [Nova] [Containers] Containers Service for OpenStack

2014-08-14 Thread Adrian Otto
OpenStack Devs, In accordance with guidance from the Nova team at the Midcycle meeting, I have drafted the following proposal for a new OpenStack service to fit into the Compute program: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/containers-service https://review.openstack.org/114044 Please

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] 3'rd party CI systems: Not Whitelisted Volume type with name * could not be found.

2014-08-14 Thread Martin, Kurt Frederick (ESSN Storage MSDU)
They need to be manually added. -Original Message- From: Asselin, Ramy Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 2:17 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] 3'rd party CI systems: Not Whitelisted Volume type with name * could not

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Review priorities as we approach juno-3

2014-08-14 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 14 août 2014 22:02, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com a écrit : Hi. We're rapidly approaching j-3, so I want to remind people of the current reviews that are high priority. The definition of high priority I am using here is blueprints that are marked high priority in launchpad that have

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Aug 14, 2014, at 4:41 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Aug 13, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: At the end of the day, that's probably going to mean saying No to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Review priorities as we approach juno-3

2014-08-14 Thread Michael Still
I have also been reminded that http://54.201.139.117/nova-bugs.html tracks bugs with outstanding code reviews (click on ready for review). There are 179 at the moment, so it sure would be cool to land some bug fixes. Thanks, Michael On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Michael Still

Re: [openstack-dev] Which program for Rally

2014-08-14 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Matt, One thing did just occur to me while writing this though it's probably worth investigating splitting out the stress test framework as an external tool/project after we start work on the tempest library. [3] I fully agree with the fact that stress testing doesn't belong to Tempest.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-14 Thread Andrew Laski
On 08/14/2014 02:48 PM, Dugger, Donald D wrote: My experience with mics, no matter how good, In conference rooms is not good. You are always working hard to hear the soft spoken person who is drowned by the background noise. It’s always a strain and I don’t want to even think about doing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-14 Thread Eoghan Glynn
Additional cross-project resources can be ponied up by the large contributor companies, and existing cross-project resources are not necessarily divertable on command. Sure additional cross-project resources can and need to be ponied up, but I am doubtful that will be enough. OK, so

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Help in understanding API Flow

2014-08-14 Thread Peter Balland
Hi Madhu, If you are trying to expose data from a new service, you need to add a new data-source driver (examples from nova and neutron are in the tree.) Once a data-source driver is registered, data from the data source will be exposed through the API automatically, and you will also be able

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Simple proposal for stabilizing new features in-tree

2014-08-14 Thread Wuhongning
Hi Sridar, Yes I know this is only for phase 1, while I'm also thinking about how it should be in next phase. At least, zone concept should be introduced, we may use it to replace SG, to eliminate potential conflicts of defining ACL in two different places.

[openstack-dev] [Sahara] Swift authentication and backwards compatibility

2014-08-14 Thread Michael McCune
hello Sahara folks, I am working to get the revamped spec[1] finalized and I'd like to know the group's thoughts on the idea of backward compatibility. It is possible to implement the new authentication method and remain backward compatible, but we will need to keep the username and password

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Python 3 support in os-*-config

2014-08-14 Thread Steve Kowalik
Hai, I've been poking at Python 3 support in os-*-config recently, and here's what is going on with it: * os-apply-config This one looks to be the hardest one to port. Multiple test failures, hard coded use of '#!/usr/bin/env python' which is unhappy in a only Python 3 environment,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Mech driver as out-of-tree add-on

2014-08-14 Thread loy wolfe
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: I also feel like the drivers/plugins are currently BEYOND a tipping point, and are in fact dragging down velocity of the core project in many ways. I'm working on a proposal for Kilo where we move all drivers/plugins out

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ml2] Mech driver as out-of-tree add-on

2014-08-14 Thread Kevin Benton
I also feel like the drivers/plugins are currently BEYOND a tipping point, and are in fact dragging down velocity of the core project in many ways. Can you elaborate on the ways that they are slowing down the velocity? I know they take up reviewer time, but are there other ways that you think

  1   2   >