Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][NFV] VIF_VHOSTUSER

2014-09-01 Thread loy wolfe
If the neutron side MD is just for snabbswitch, then I thinks there is no change to be merged into the tree. Maybe we can learn from sriov nic, although backend is vendor specific, but the MD is generic, can support snabb, dpdkovs, ans other userspace vswitch, etc. As the reference implementation

Re: [openstack-dev] Rally scenario Issue

2014-09-01 Thread masoom alam
How you solved this issue of syntax error. We are getting the same error: # rally -v task start rally/doc/samples/tasks/scenarios/vm/boot-runcommand- delete.json Command failed, please check log for more info 2014-09-01 07:31:52.606 9155 CRITICAL rally [-] ParserError: while parsing a flow

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] (Non-)consistency of the Ironic hash ring implementation

2014-09-01 Thread Nejc Saje
Hey guys, in Ceilometer we're using consistent hash rings to do workload partitioning[1]. We've considered generalizing your hash ring implementation and moving it up to oslo, but unfortunately your implementation is not actually consistent, which is our requirement. Since you divide your

[openstack-dev] [Trove] Trove Blueprint Meeting on 1 Sep canceled

2014-09-01 Thread Nikhil Manchanda
Hello team: Most folks are going to be out on Monday September 1st, on account of it being Labor Day in the US. Consequently, I'd like to cancel the the Trove blueprint meeting this week. See you guys at the regular Trove meeting on Wednesday. Thanks, Nikhil

[openstack-dev] [kesytone][multidomain] - Time to leave LDAP backend?

2014-09-01 Thread Marcos Fermin Lobo
Hi all, I found two functionalities for keystone that could be against each other. Multi-domain feature (This functionality is new in Juno.) --- Link: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/keystone/configuration.html#domain-specific-drivers Keystone supports the option to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptls] The Czar system, or how to scale PTLs

2014-09-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
James Polley wrote: I'm fairly certain the buzzing sound I can hear is a bee in my bonnet... so I suspect that I'm starting to sound like someone chasing a bee that only they can hear. I'm not sure if it's helpful to keep this discussion on this list - would there be a better forum somewhere

Re: [openstack-dev] [vmware] Canonical list of os types

2014-09-01 Thread Matthew Booth
On 30/08/14 03:45, Steve Gordon wrote: - Original Message - From: Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com On 14/08/14 12:41, Steve Gordon wrote: - Original Message - From: Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from packaging perspective

2014-09-01 Thread Maru Newby
On Aug 26, 2014, at 5:06 PM, Pradeep Kilambi (pkilambi) pkila...@cisco.com wrote: On 8/26/14, 4:49 AM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote: On Aug 25, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Pradeep Kilambi (pkilambi) pkila...@cisco.com wrote: On 8/23/14, 5:36 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] libvirt version_cap, a postmortem

2014-09-01 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 05:08:16PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey The libvirt version_cap debacle continues to come up in conversation and one perception of the whole thing appears to be: A controversial patch was ninjaed by three Red Hat nova-cores and then the same individuals

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][neutron] Neutron full job, advanced services, and the integrated gate

2014-09-01 Thread Maru Newby
On Aug 27, 2014, at 1:47 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: TL; DR A few folks are proposing to stop running tests for neutron advanced services [ie: (lb|vpn|fw)aas] in the integrated gate, and run them only on the neutron gate. Reason: projects like nova are 100%

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting reminder - 09/01/2014

2014-09-01 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Hi, As usually, this is a reminder about team meeting today at 16.00 UTC #openstack-meeting. Agenda: Review action items Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) Release 0.1 progress Open discussion (See it also at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MistralAgenda as

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Feedback required on convergence observer implementation

2014-09-01 Thread Gurjar, Unmesh
Hi All, As a part of the implementation of Convergence BP, I have submitted change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118143/ ) for moving the implementation of check_create_complete method of 'server' resource to Observer. To start with, for Juno, the convergence feature will be turned off by

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from packaging perspective

2014-09-01 Thread joehuang
Hello, Not all features which had already been shipped in Neutron supported by Horizon. For example, multi provider network. This is not the special case only happened in Neutron. For example, Glance delivered V2 api in IceHouse or even early and support Image muti-locations feature, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [third-party] [infra] New mailing lists for third party announcements and account requests

2014-09-01 Thread Erlon Cruz
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: On Fri 29 Aug 2014 12:47:00 PM PDT, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote: Third-party-request This list is the new place to request the creation or modification of your third party account. Note that old requests sent to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]

2014-09-01 Thread Susanne Balle
Kyle, Adam, Based on this thread Kyle is suggesting the follow moving forward plan: 1) We incubate Neutron LBaaS V2 in the “Neutron” incubator “and freeze LBaas V1.0” 2) “Eventually” It graduates into a project under the networking program. 3) “At that point” We deprecate Neutron LBaaS v1.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from packaging perspective

2014-09-01 Thread Robert Kukura
Sure, Horizon (or Heat) support is not always required for new features entering incubation, but when a goal in incubating a feature is to get it packaged with OpenStack distributions and into the hands of as many early adopters as possible to gather feedback, these integrations are very

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] refactoring of resize/migrate

2014-09-01 Thread Markus Zoeller
John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com wrote on 08/29/2014 07:59:38 PM: From: John Garbutt j...@johngarbutt.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 08/29/2014 08:12 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] refactoring of

[openstack-dev] [Swift] Swift 2.1.0 released

2014-09-01 Thread John Dickinson
I'm happy to announce that Swift 2.1.0 has been released. This release includes several useful features that I'd like to highlight. First, Swift's data placement algorithm was slightly changed to improve adding capacity. Specifically, now when you add a new region to an existing Swift cluster,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Use Launcher/ProcessLauncher in glance

2014-09-01 Thread stuart . mclaren
I've been looking at the most recent patch for this (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117988/). I'm wondering what behaviour do folks feel is best in the following scenario? 1) an image download starts (download1) 2) send SIGHUP to glance-api 3) start another download (download2) 4)

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting minutes/log - 09/01/2014

2014-09-01 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Thanks for joining our team meeting today! Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-09-01-16.00.html Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2014/mistral.2014-09-01-16.00.log.html Agenda/archive:

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] change to deprecation policy in the incubator

2014-09-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Aug 29, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On 08/28/2014 11:14 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Before Juno we set a deprecation policy for graduating libraries that said the incubated versions of the modules would stay in the incubator repository for one full cycle after

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] change to deprecation policy in the incubator

2014-09-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Aug 29, 2014, at 5:53 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/28/2014 06:14 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Before Juno we set a deprecation policy for graduating libraries that said the incubated versions of the modules would stay in the incubator repository for one full cycle after

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is the BP approval process broken?

2014-09-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Aug 29, 2014, at 5:07 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Joe Gordon wrote: On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Alan Kavanagh alan.kavan...@ericsson.com mailto:alan.kavan...@ericsson.com wrote: I share Donald's points here, I believe what would help is to clearly

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Should docker plugin remove containers on delete?

2014-09-01 Thread Lars Kellogg-Stedman
Hello all, I recently submitted this change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/118190/ This causes the Docker plugin to *remove* containers on delete, rather than simply *stopping* them. When creating named containers, the stop but do not remove behavior would cause conflicts when try to

[openstack-dev] Audio Visual Content and Structure for training-guides

2014-09-01 Thread Sayali Lunkad
Hi, This is the etherpad link to discuss the structure and content of the Audio Visual content to be included in the training-guides. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstck-training-guides%28Audio_Visual_Content%29 Please feel free to add or edit the content here. Regards, Sayali.

[openstack-dev] [qa] [ceilometer] [swift] tempests tests, grenade, old branches

2014-09-01 Thread Chris Dent
I've got a review in progress for adding a telemetry scenario test: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115971/ It can't pass the *-icehouse tests because ceilometer-api is not present on the icehouse side of a havana-icehouse upgrade. In the process of trying to figure out what's going on I

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday September 2nd at 19:00 UTC

2014-09-01 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is hosting our weekly meeting on Tuesday September 2nd, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [UX] [Horizon] [Heat] Merlin project (formerly known as cross-project UI library for Heat/Mistral/Murano/Solum) plans for PoC and more

2014-09-01 Thread Drago Rosson
Timur, I am excited to hear that you think that Barricade could be used in Merlin! Your feedback is fantastic and I am impressed that you have been able to understand Barricade so well from only the source and the spec. I am replying to your feedback inline: On 8/29/14, 2:59 PM, Timur Sufiev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit reloaded

2014-09-01 Thread Hayes, Graham
On Fri, 2014-08-29 at 17:56 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hayes, Graham wrote: Yep, I think this works in theory, the tough part will be when all the incubating projects realize they're sending people for a single day? Maybe it'll work out differently than I think though. It means fitting

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Launchpad tracking of oslo projects

2014-09-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Aug 28, 2014, at 7:57 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Thierry Carrez wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: This makes sense to me, so let’s move ahead with your plan. OK, this is now done: Project group @ https://launchpad.net/oslo Oslo incubator:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Pre-5.1 and master builds ISO are available for download

2014-09-01 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
We should not confuse beta and rc builds, normally betas predate RCs and serve a different purpose. In that sense, the nightlies we currently publish are closest to what beta builds should be. As discussed earlier in the thread, we already have full versioning and provenance information in each

[openstack-dev] [neutron] New meeting rotation starting next week

2014-09-01 Thread Kyle Mestery
Per discussion again today in the Neutron meeting, next week we'll start rotating the meeting. This will mean next week we'll meet on Tuesday (9-9-2014) at 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-alt. I've updated the Neutron meeting page [1] as well as the meeting wiki page [2] with the new details on

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] New meeting rotation starting next week

2014-09-01 Thread Kevin Benton
Is it possible to put an iCal on the wiki so we can automatically see when meetings are updated/cancelled/moved? On Sep 1, 2014 6:23 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: Per discussion again today in the Neutron meeting, next week we'll start rotating the meeting. This will mean next

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from packaging perspective

2014-09-01 Thread joehuang
Hello, 1. As dashboard, Horizon even does not support all stable OpenStack API ( including Neutron API ), not mention to unstable API 2. For incubation feature, the introduced API is not stable and not necessary for Horizon to support that. 3. The incubation feature could be experience by

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] New meeting rotation starting next week

2014-09-01 Thread Anne Gentle
Look on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings for a link to an iCal feed of all OpenStack meetings. https://www.google.com/calendar/ical/bj05mroquq28jhud58esggq...@group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Is it

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from packaging perspective

2014-09-01 Thread Kevin Benton
Is it possible to have a /contrib folder or something similar where experimental modules can be placed? Requiring a separate Horizon distribution for every project in the incubator is really going to make it difficult to get users to try them out. On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 6:39 PM, joehuang

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] New meeting rotation starting next week

2014-09-01 Thread Kevin Benton
Unfortunately the master ICAL has so many meetings that it's not useful to have displaying as part of a normal calendar. I was hoping for a Neutron-specific one similar to Tripleo's. On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote: Look on

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][IPv6] Neighbor Discovery for HA

2014-09-01 Thread Xu Han Peng
Anthony, Thanks for your reply. If HA method like VRRP are used for IPv6 router, according to the VRRP RFC with IPv6 included, the servers should be auto-configured with the active router's LLA as the default route before the failover happens and still remain that route after the failover.

[openstack-dev] [third party][neutron] - OpenDaylight CI and -1 voting

2014-09-01 Thread Kevin Benton
I have had multiple occasions where the OpenDaylight CI will vote a -1 on a patch for something completely unrelated (e.g. [1]). This would be fine except for two issues. First, there doesn't appear to be any way to trigger a recheck. Second, there is no maintainer listed on the Neutron third

Re: [openstack-dev] [third party][neutron] - OpenDaylight CI and -1 voting

2014-09-01 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
I have had multiple occasions where the OpenDaylight CI will vote a -1 on a patch for something completely unrelated (e.g. [1]). This would be fine except for two issues. First, there doesn't appear to be any way to trigger a recheck. Second, there is no maintainer listed on the Neutron third

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from packaging perspective

2014-09-01 Thread Wuhongning
It would satisfy everyone if horizon support all APIs, either in tree or in the lab, but at the perquisite that we have enough resource for horizon. Else for the limitation of resource, we have to sort by the priority, then should we focus on APIs being baked in the incubator first?

Re: [openstack-dev] [third party][neutron] - OpenDaylight CI and -1 voting

2014-09-01 Thread Kevin Benton
Thank you YAMAMOTO. I didn't think to look at stackalytics. Kyle, can you list yourself on the wiki? I don't want to do it in case there is someone else doing that job full time. Also, is there a re-trigger phrase that you can document on the Wiki or in the message body the CI posts to the

[openstack-dev] [Cinder][Nova]Quest about Cinder Brick proposal

2014-09-01 Thread Emma Lin
Hi Gurus, I saw the wiki page for Cinder Brick proposal for Havana, but I didn't see any follow up on that idea. Is there any real progress on that idea? As this proposal is to address the local storage issue, I'd like to know the status, and to see if there is any task required for hypervisor

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Incubator concerns from packaging perspective

2014-09-01 Thread Kevin Benton
Definitely don't prioritize it. I was just saying that people developing these would probably be happy to do all of the development and testing. Is the resource limitation in Horizon on the reviewer side or the code contribution side? I'm sure there are people familiar with Neutron that would be

[openstack-dev] [gantt] scheduler sub-group agenda 9/2

2014-09-01 Thread Dugger, Donald D
1) Forklift status 2) Next steps (now that Isolate Scheduler DB blueprint was rejected) 3) Opens -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale Ph: 303/443-3786 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][octavia]

2014-09-01 Thread Brandon Logan
Hi Susanne and everyone, My opinions are that keeping it in stackforge until it gets mature is the best solution. I'm pretty sure we can all agree on that. Whenever it is mature then, and only then, we should try to get it into openstack one way or another. If Neutron LBaaS v2 is still