Re: [openstack-dev] [all][docs][tc] How to scale Documentation

2014-10-04 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/04/2014 12:26 AM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 10/03/2014 07:50 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: Here's my current thinking and plan of attack on multiple fronts. Oh, that analogy is so militaristic, I'd revise more peacefully but ... time. :) 1. We need better page-based design and navigation for

Re: [openstack-dev] What's a dependency (was Re: [all][tc] governance changes for big tent...) model

2014-10-04 Thread Chris Dent
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Devananda van der Veen wrote: Nope. I am not making any value judgement whatsoever. I'm describing dependencies for minimally satisfying the intended purpose of a given project. For example, Nova's primary goal is not emit telemetry, it is scalable, on demand, self service

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Multi-clouds integration by OpenStack cascading

2014-10-04 Thread henry hly
Hi Monty and Cellers, I understand that there are installation base for Cells, these clouds are still running and some issues needed to be addressed for the daily operation. For sure the improvement on Cells are necessary to be done in first class for the community's commitment. The introduction

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

2014-10-04 Thread Mike Bayer
On Oct 4, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Does sqlalchemy have good support for cross-database foreign keys? I was under the impression that they cannot be implemented with the normal syntax and semantics of an intra-database foreign-key constraint. cross

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][docs][tc] How to scale Documentation

2014-10-04 Thread Anne Gentle
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Chris Friesen chris.frie...@windriver.com wrote: On 10/03/2014 07:50 PM, Anne Gentle wrote: Here's my current thinking and plan of attack on multiple fronts. Oh, that analogy is so militaristic, I'd revise more peacefully but ... time. :) 1. We need better

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

2014-10-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2014-10-04 08:10:38 -0700: On Oct 4, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Does sqlalchemy have good support for cross-database foreign keys? I was under the impression that they cannot be implemented with the normal syntax and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

2014-10-04 Thread Henry Gessau
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2014-10-04 08:10:38 -0700: On Oct 4, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Does sqlalchemy have good support for cross-database foreign keys? I was under the impression that they cannot be

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] [I18N] compiling translation message catalogs

2014-10-04 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Thanks all for your input. This topic was also discussed in the I18N team meeting this week. All opinions I got so far are same and we seem to have a consensus. - not to have mo files (compile message catalogs) in our source git repository. - to provide a quick documentation on how to generate mo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Group-based Policy] Database migration chain

2014-10-04 Thread Mike Bayer
On Oct 4, 2014, at 11:24 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2014-10-04 08:10:38 -0700: On Oct 4, 2014, at 1:10 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: Does sqlalchemy have good support for cross-database foreign keys? I was under the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][docs][tc] How to scale Documentation

2014-10-04 Thread Jay Pipes
On 10/03/2014 09:18 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: The prospect of a much larger tent with many more projects in OpenStack-proper shines a spotlight on the scalability of the Docs team, and in particular how they decide which projects are important to work on directly. I don't believe that a ticket to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][docs][tc] How to scale Documentation

2014-10-04 Thread Joshua Harlow
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/03/2014 09:18 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: The prospect of a much larger tent with many more projects in OpenStack-proper shines a spotlight on the scalability of the Docs team, and in particular how they decide which