[openstack-dev] [stable] New to project stable maintenance, question on requirements changes

2015-02-24 Thread Trevor McKay
Hi folks, I've just joined the stable maintenance team for Sahara. We have this review here, from OpenStack proposal bot: https://review.openstack.org/158775/ Since it came from the proposal bot, there's no justification in the commit message and no cherry pick. I didn't see this case

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test guidelines

2015-02-24 Thread melanie witt
On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:47, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: I'm happy if there are other theories about how we do these things, being the first functional test in the python-novaclient tree that creates and destroys real resources, there isn't an established pattern yet. But I think doing all

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] New to project stable maintenance, question on requirements changes

2015-02-24 Thread Sean Dague
On 02/24/2015 02:34 PM, Trevor McKay wrote: Hi folks, I've just joined the stable maintenance team for Sahara. We have this review here, from OpenStack proposal bot: https://review.openstack.org/158775/ Since it came from the proposal bot, there's no justification in the commit

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Tag bugs with features from current release

2015-02-24 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
During bugs triage and release notes preparation we often need to find out whether a bug is a regression introduced by new code in the current release, or may have been present in previous releases. In the latter case, depending on its severity, it may need to be reflected in the release notes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Joe Gordon wrote: [...] I think a lot of the frustration with our current cadence comes out of the big stop everything (development, planning etc.), and stabilize the release process. Which in turn isn't really

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] New to project stable maintenance, question on requirements changes

2015-02-24 Thread Trevor McKay
Sean, thanks! I feel better already. I'll check out the review. Trevor On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 14:39 -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 02/24/2015 02:34 PM, Trevor McKay wrote: Hi folks, I've just joined the stable maintenance team for Sahara. We have this review here, from OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Sean Dague
On 02/24/2015 03:21 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com mailto:berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:50:45AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 02/24/2015 07:48 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 02/24/2015

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test guidelines

2015-02-24 Thread Ed Leafe
On Feb 24, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Right, I think to some degree novaclient is legacy code, and we should focus on specific regressions and bugs without doing to much code change. The future should be more focussed on openstacksdk and openstackclient. IMO,

[openstack-dev] [oslo] Graduating oslo.reports: Request to review clean copy

2015-02-24 Thread Solly Ross
Hello All, I've finally had some time to finish up the graduation work for oslo.reports (previously openstack.common.report), and it should be ready for review by the Oslo team. The only thing that I was unclear about was the sync required tools from oslo-incubator part. oslo.reports does not

Re: [openstack-dev] python-ceilometerclient 1.0.13 broke the gate

2015-02-24 Thread Joe Gordon
We saw the same issue elsewhere, and Doug had great explanation on how it broke semver https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg46533.html On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test guidelines

2015-02-24 Thread Sean Dague
On 02/24/2015 03:28 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: IMHO the CLI should have an option to returned raw JSON back instead of pretty tabled results as well. Um... isn't that just the API calls? I'm not sure creating a 3rd functional surface

[openstack-dev] client library release versions

2015-02-24 Thread Robert Collins
Hi, in the cross project meeting a small but important thing came up. Most (all?) of our client libraries run with semver: x.y.z version numbers. http://semver.org/ and http://docs.openstack.org/developer/pbr/semver.html However we're seeing recent releases that are bumping .z inappropriately.

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

2015-02-24 Thread Bharat Kumar
Ran the job manually on rax VM, provided by Jeremy. (Thank you Jeremy). After running 971 test cases VM inaccessible for 569 ticks, then continues... (Look at the console.log [1]) And also have a look at dstat log. [2] The summary is: == Totals == Ran: 1125 tests in 5835. sec. -

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test guidelines

2015-02-24 Thread Sean Dague
On 02/24/2015 01:47 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net mailto:s...@dague.net wrote: Towards the end of merging the regression test for the nova volume-attach bug - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157959/ there was a discussion

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:14:36PM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: Was: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/057578.html There has been frustration with our current 6 month development

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test guidelines

2015-02-24 Thread Ed Leafe
On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: IMHO the CLI should have an option to returned raw JSON back instead of pretty tabled results as well. Um... isn't that just the API calls? I'm not sure creating a 3rd functional surface is really the answer here, because we

[openstack-dev] [infra] Infra cloud: infra running a cloud for nodepool

2015-02-24 Thread James E. Blair
A group of folks from HP is interested in starting an effort to run a cloud as part of the Infrastructure program with the purpose of providing resources to nodepool for OpenStack testing. HP is supplying two racks of machines, and we will operate each as an independent cloud. I think this is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Johannes Erdfelt johan...@erdfelt.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Agree on the pain of maintaining milestone plans though, which is why I propose we get rid of most of it in Liberty. That will actually be

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Ed Leafe
On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: I think the release candidate period is the only thing that makes your code drops actually usable. It's the only moment in the cycle where integrators test. It's the only moment in the cycle where developers work on bugs

[openstack-dev] python-ceilometerclient 1.0.13 broke the gate

2015-02-24 Thread Matt Riedemann
https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+bug/1425262 mtreinish adjusted the cap on stable/icehouse here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158842/ jogo now has a change to explicitly pin all clients in stable/icehouse to the version currently gated on:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:50:45AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 02/24/2015 07:48 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 02/24/2015 12:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Outcome of the nova FFE meeting for Kilo

2015-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:24:01PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: Here's another thought: is the big-bang integrated 6-month fixed release cycle useful any more? Can we talk about using more of a moving train model that doesn't have these long freeze cycles? At least for some of the projects, I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Outcome of the nova FFE meeting for Kilo

2015-02-24 Thread Duncan Thomas
Agreed. It causes two problems: 1) 9 month delays in getting code into a release 2) Some projects consider something to be breakable, from a back compatibility point of view, until it has made a formal release, which means anybody cutting releases from anything other than final/stable is facing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] [QA] Automated tests for all Murano applications

2015-02-24 Thread Timur Nurlygayanov
Hi Boris, this idea is about the JSON files for each Murano application, which can be used in Murano functional tests or in Rally tests with Rally jobs for each commit to Murano engine and Murano applications repositories. I like the idea to configure Rally jobs for Murano repositories and then

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Russell Bryant
On 02/24/2015 01:28 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:54:31AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:54:31AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker, it is just a sign that the project

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 24/02/15 11:02 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:44:57AM +, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: I was writing this mail for the past few days, but the nova thread today prompted me to finish it off send it :-) Thanks for doing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker, it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on providing more resources to the teams impacted in that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: I was writing this mail for the past few days, but the nova thread today prompted me to finish it off send it :-) Thanks for doing this. I think you're probably right that the current release cycle has many negative impacts on the development

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker, it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on providing more resources to the teams impacted in that way. What are the mechanisms whereby the project provides more

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:14:36PM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: Was: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/057578.html There has been frustration with our current 6 month development cadence. This is an attempt to explain those frustrations and propose a very rough

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Resuming of workflows/tasks

2015-02-24 Thread Dulko, Michal
Hi all, I was working on spec[1] and prototype[2] to make Cinder to be able to resume workflows in case of server or service failure. Problem of requests lost and resources left in unresolved states in case of failure was signaled at the Paris Summit[3]. What I was able to prototype was to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Russell Bryant
On 02/24/2015 12:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker, it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:50:45AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: On 02/24/2015 07:48 AM, Russell Bryant wrote: On 02/24/2015 12:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: need to do more work. If

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][requirements] External dependency caps introduced in 499db6b

2015-02-24 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 06:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Joe Gordon wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] bp serial-ports *partly* implemented?

2015-02-24 Thread Markus Zoeller
Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com wrote on 02/23/2015 11:13:12 AM: From: Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 02/23/2015 11:17 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] bp serial-ports *partly* implemented?

2015-02-24 Thread Markus Zoeller
Tony Breeds t...@bakeyournoodle.com wrote on 02/21/2015 08:35:32 AM: From: Tony Breeds t...@bakeyournoodle.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 02/21/2015 08:41 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] bp serial-ports

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [cinder] CI via infra for the DRBD Cinder driver

2015-02-24 Thread James E. Blair
Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info writes: I'd like to make sure that if Infra is saying that CI jobs on drivers can gate that this is a substantial difference from what I have been saying for a year, specifically that they can't and won't. For the purposes of this conversation, the distinction

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] Vancouver Summit: Glance Friday Sprint

2015-02-24 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Hi, For those who are interested and are planning to book travel soon, please do keep in mind that Glance team is planning to have a halfday sprint on Friday of the week of the summit. Besides, we will have fishbowl and work sessions during the week. Please feel free to reach out to me, if

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

2015-02-24 Thread Deepak Shetty
FWIW, we tried to run our job in a rax provider VM (provided by ianw from his personal account) and we ran the tempest tests twice, but the OOM did not re-create. Of the 2 runs, one of the run used the same PYTHONHASHSEED as we had in one of the failed runs, still no oom. Jeremy graciously agreed

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

2015-02-24 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:49:29AM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Jeremy, Couldn't find anything strong in the logs to back the reason for OOM. At the time OOM happens, mysqld and java processes have the most RAM

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Midcycle Summary

2015-02-24 Thread James Slagle
Hi Everyone, TripleO held a midcycle meetup from February 18th-20th in Seattle. Thanks to HP for hosting the event! I wanted to send out a summary of what went on. We also captured some notes on an etherpad[0]. The first order of business was that I volunteered to serve as PTL of TripleO for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [thirdpartyCI][cinder] Question about certification

2015-02-24 Thread Eduard Matei
Thanks Duncan. It's commenting and it works (meaning it runs and it's able to detect errors). Sometimes it gives a FAILURE but that's either due to the patch (rare) or due to devstack (often). Also logs are visible and included in the comment. Eduard On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Duncan

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Sean Dague wrote: That also provides a very concrete answer to will people show up. Because if they do, and we get this horizontal refactoring happening, then we get to the point of being able to change release cadences faster. If they don't, we remain with the existing

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] [cinder] CI via infra for the DRBD Cinder driver

2015-02-24 Thread Anita Kuno
On 02/24/2015 04:40 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: For cinder, we don't want to gate on drivers, and will be unhappy if that gets turned on, so the story hasn't changed, Anita. I think Jim was pointing out the technical possibility, which is a fine and valid thing to point out. Cinder core are

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: What this actually means: - Stop approving blueprints for specific stable releases, instead just approve them and target them to milestones. - Milestones stop becoming Kilo-1, Kilo-2, Kilo-3 etc. and just become

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] ML2 versus core plugin for OVN

2015-02-24 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: On 24 February 2015 at 01:34, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: Russel and I have already merged the initial ML2 skeleton driver [1]. The thinking is that we can always revert to a non-ML2 driver if needed.

[openstack-dev] [Fuel][Library][Fuel-CI] verify-fuel-library-python job enabled

2015-02-24 Thread Aleksandra Fedorova
Hi everyone, we've enabled job verify-fuel-library-python (see [1]) to test Python scripts in Fuel Library code. It is triggered for all commits to master branch in stackforge/fuel-library Master currently passes the test, see [2]. Please check and rebase your patchsets for this job to work. In

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] ML2 versus core plugin for OVN

2015-02-24 Thread Kevin Benton
OVN implementing it's own control plane isn't a good reason to make it a monolithic plugin. Many of the ML2 drivers are for technologies with their own control plane. Going with the monolithic plugin only makes sense if you are certain that you never want interoperability with other technologies

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test guidelines

2015-02-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Towards the end of merging the regression test for the nova volume-attach bug - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157959/ there was a discussion around what style the functional tests should take. Especially as that had a mix of

[openstack-dev] Kerberos in OpenStack

2015-02-24 Thread Sanket Lawangare
Hello Everyone, My name is Sanket Lawangare. I am a graduate Student studying at The University of Texas, at San Antonio. For my Master’s Thesis I am working on the Identity component of OpenStack. My research is to investigate external authentication with Identity(keystone) using Kerberos.

Re: [openstack-dev] ECMP on Neutron virtual router

2015-02-24 Thread Carl Baldwin
It doesn't support this at this time. There are no current plans to make it work. I'm curious to know how you would like for this to work in your deployment. Carl On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, NAPIERALA, MARIA H mn1...@att.com wrote: Does Neutron router support ECMP across multiple static

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] ML2 versus core plugin for OVN

2015-02-24 Thread Salvatore Orlando
I think we're speculating a lot about what would be best for OVN whereas we should probably just expose pro and cons of ML2 drivers vs standalone plugin (as I said earlier on indeed it does not necessarily imply monolithic *) I reckon the job of the Neutron community is to provide a full picture

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Thierry Carrez
Johannes Erdfelt wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: What this actually means: - Stop approving blueprints for specific stable releases, instead just approve them and target them to milestones. - Milestones stop becoming Kilo-1, Kilo-2, Kilo-3

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Prefix delegation using dibbler client

2015-02-24 Thread John Davidge (jodavidg)
Hello all, We now have a work-in-progress patch up for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158697/ Feedback on our approach is much appreciated. Many thanks, John Davidge OpenStack@Cisco On 20/02/2015 18:28, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread David Kranz
On 02/24/2015 09:37 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Sean Dague wrote: That also provides a very concrete answer to will people show up. Because if they do, and we get this horizontal refactoring happening, then we get to the point of being able to change release cadences faster. If

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [glance] conclusion needed on functional API

2015-02-24 Thread michael mccune
On 02/24/2015 03:09 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 22/02/15 22:43 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: On 02/18/2015 06:37 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: Thanks for your comment, Miguel. Your suggestion is indeed very close to the RESTful ideal. However, I have a question for the entire API-WG. Our (proposed)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/24/2015 09:37 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Sean Dague wrote: That also provides a very concrete answer to will people show up. Because if they do, and we get this horizontal refactoring happening,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Midcycle Summary

2015-02-24 Thread Ben Nemec
Thanks for the summary. A couple of comments inline. On 02/24/2015 08:48 AM, James Slagle wrote: Hi Everyone, TripleO held a midcycle meetup from February 18th-20th in Seattle. Thanks to HP for hosting the event! I wanted to send out a summary of what went on. We also captured some notes

[openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test guidelines

2015-02-24 Thread Sean Dague
Towards the end of merging the regression test for the nova volume-attach bug - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157959/ there was a discussion around what style the functional tests should take. Especially as that had a mix of CLI and API calls in it. Here are my thoughts for why that test ended

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Midcycle Summary

2015-02-24 Thread Jason Rist
On 02/24/2015 07:48 AM, James Slagle wrote: Hi Everyone, TripleO held a midcycle meetup from February 18th-20th in Seattle. Thanks to HP for hosting the event! I wanted to send out a summary of what went on. We also captured some notes on an etherpad[0]. The first order of business was

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Sean Dague
On 02/24/2015 12:33 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com mailto:dkr...@redhat.com wrote: On 02/24/2015 09:37 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Sean Dague wrote: That also provides a very concrete

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Agree on the pain of maintaining milestone plans though, which is why I propose we get rid of most of it in Liberty. That will actually be discussed at the cross-project meeting today:

[openstack-dev] ECMP on Neutron virtual router

2015-02-24 Thread NAPIERALA, MARIA H
Does Neutron router support ECMP across multiple static routes to the same destination network but with different next-hops? Maria __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [thirdpartyCI][cinder] Question about certification

2015-02-24 Thread Mike Perez
On 12:47 Tue 24 Feb , Eduard Matei wrote: The question is: does the CI need voting rights (validated) , or just check/comment to be considered working? See: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#When_thirdparty_CI_voting_will_be_required.3F -- Mike Perez

Re: [openstack-dev] ECMP on Neutron virtual router

2015-02-24 Thread Kevin Benton
I wonder if there is a way we can easily abuse the extra routes extension to do this? Maybe two routes to the same network would imply ECMP. If not, maybe this can fit into a larger refactoring for route management (dynamic routing, etc). On Feb 24, 2015 11:02 AM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Tempest] Tempest will deny extra properties on Nova v2/v2.1 API

2015-02-24 Thread David Kranz
On 02/24/2015 06:55 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: Hi Ghanshyam, 2015-02-24 20:28 GMT+09:00 GHANSHYAM MANN ghanshyamm...@gmail.com: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nova team is developing Nova v2.1 API + microversions in this cycle, and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] tracking bugs superseded by blueprints

2015-02-24 Thread Aleksey Kasatkin
I think it is better to keep such bugs open. Please see https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/granular-network-functions . There are some related bugs here. One is fixed, another one is in progress, two are closed. If bug is strictly coherent with blueprint (like

Re: [openstack-dev] Kerberos in OpenStack

2015-02-24 Thread Tim Bell
You may also get some information from how we set up Kerberos at CERN at http://openstack-in-production.blogspot.fr/2014/10/kerberos-and-single-sign-on-with.html From my understanding, the only connection is between Keystone and KDC. There is a standard Keystone token issues based off the

Re: [openstack-dev] Kerberos in OpenStack

2015-02-24 Thread Adam Young
On 02/24/2015 01:53 PM, Sanket Lawangare wrote: Hello Everyone, My name is Sanket Lawangare. I am a graduate Student studying at The University of Texas, at San Antonio.For my Master’s Thesis I am working on the Identity component of OpenStack. My research is to investigate external

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Graduating oslo.reports: Request to review clean copy

2015-02-24 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, at 04:42 PM, Solly Ross wrote: Hello All, I've finally had some time to finish up the graduation work for oslo.reports (previously openstack.common.report), and it should be ready for review by the Oslo team. The only thing that I was unclear about was the sync

[openstack-dev] Name field marked mandatory on Horizon

2015-02-24 Thread Yamini Sardana
Hello all, For creating Networks, Images, Volumes etc, the name field is marked as mandatory on the Horizon UI whereas, in their corresponding create commands on the cli it is an optional field ( which is as per the API reference documents) Why is this inconsistency? Secondly, when we create

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Infra cloud: infra running a cloud for nodepool

2015-02-24 Thread Asselin, Ramy
I think this is really neat. As a 3rd party ci operator managing a small nodepool cloud, leveraging #3 would be really great! Ramy -Original Message- From: James E. Blair [mailto:cor...@inaugust.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 1:19 PM To: openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org Cc:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Mark Atwood
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, at 04:28, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote: Along with the below, if push comes to shove, OpenStack Foundation could probably try a milder variant (obviously, not all activities can be categorized as 'critical path') of Linux Foundation's Critical Infrastructure Protection

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Tempest] Tempest will deny extra properties on Nova v2/v2.1 API

2015-02-24 Thread Kenichi Oomichi
Hi David, -Original Message- From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 4:19 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Tempest] Tempest will deny extra properties on Nova v2/v2.1 API

[openstack-dev] [python-novaclient] [python-client] Queries regarding how to run test cases of python-client in juno release

2015-02-24 Thread Rattenpal Amandeep
Hi I am unable to find script for run test cases of python-clients in juno release. novaclients are shilfed into dist-packages but there is no script for run the test cases. Please help me to come out from this problem. Thanks, Regards Amandeep Rattenpal Asst. System Engineer, Mail to:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] ML2 versus core plugin for OVN

2015-02-24 Thread Amit Kumar Saha (amisaha)
Hi, I am new to OpenStack (and am particularly interested in networking). I am getting a bit confused by this discussion. Aren’t there already a few monolithic plugins (that is what I could understand from reading the Networking chapter of the OpenStack Cloud Administrator Guide. Table 7.3

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] (RE: Change in openstack/neutron-specs[master]: Introducing Tap-as-a-Service)

2015-02-24 Thread Kyle Mestery
There is a -2 (from me). And this was done from the auto-abandon script which I try to run once a month. As Kevin said, the suggestion multiple times was to do a StackForge project for this work, that's the best way forward here. On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:01 PM, CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Graduating oslo.reports: Request to review clean copy

2015-02-24 Thread Solly Ross
Those scripts have mostly moved into oslotest, so they don't need to be synced any more to be used. If you have all of your code, and it follows the cookiecutter template, we can look at it and propose post-import tweaks. What's the URL for the repository? Heh, whoops. I should probably

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Neutron] out-of-tree plugin for Mech driver/L2 and vif_driver

2015-02-24 Thread henry hly
So are we talking about using script to eliminate unnecessary new vif types? Then, a little confusion that why this BP[1] is postponed to L, and this BP[2] is merged in K. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146914/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148805/ In fact [2] can be replaced by

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] (RE: Change in openstack/neutron-specs[master]: Introducing Tap-as-a-Service)

2015-02-24 Thread CARVER, PAUL
Maybe I'm misreading review.o.o, but I don't see the -2. There was a -2 from Salvatore Orlando with the comment The -2 on this patch is only to deter further comments and a link to 140292, but 140292 has a comment from Kyle saying it's been abandoned in favor of going back to 96149. Are we in a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo] Dealing with database connection sharing issues

2015-02-24 Thread Robert Collins
On 23 February 2015 at 13:54, Michael Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong but the register_after_fork seems to apply only to the higher level Process abstraction. If someone calls os.fork(), as is the case now, there's no hook to use. Hence the solution I have in place

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] [Cinder-GlusterFS CI] centos7 gate job abrupt failures

2015-02-24 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-02-25 01:02:07 +0530 (+0530), Bharat Kumar wrote: [...] After running 971 test cases VM inaccessible for 569 ticks [...] Glad you're able to reproduce it. For the record that is running their 8GB performance flavor with a CentOS 7 PVHVM base image. The steps to recreate are

Re: [openstack-dev] ECMP on Neutron virtual router

2015-02-24 Thread henry hly
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: I wonder if there is a way we can easily abuse the extra routes extension to do this? Maybe two routes to the same network would imply ECMP. It's a good idea, and we deploy a system with similar concept(by extra routes) by

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] db-level locks, non-blocking algorithms, active/active DB clusters and IPAM

2015-02-24 Thread Robert Collins
On 24 February 2015 at 01:07, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: Lazy-Stacker summary: ... In the medium term, there are a few things we might consider for Neutron's built-in IPAM. 1) Move the allocation logic out of the driver, thus making IPAM an independent service. The API

[openstack-dev] [manuals] Training guide issue

2015-02-24 Thread Ajay Kalambur (akalambu)
Hi I am trying to just get started with openstack commits and wanted to start by fixing some documentation bugs. I assigned 3 bugs which seem to be in the same file/area https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-training-guides/+bug/1380153

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] Infra cloud: infra running a cloud for nodepool

2015-02-24 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes: A group of folks from HP is interested in starting an effort to run a cloud as part of the Infrastructure program with the purpose of providing resources to nodepool for OpenStack testing. HP is supplying two racks of machines, and we will operate

Re: [openstack-dev] client library release versions

2015-02-24 Thread Robert Collins
On 25 February 2015 at 11:18, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: I was hoping to do a sqlalchemy-migrate release this week so I'm interested in not screwing that up. :) The current release is 0.9.4 and there was one change to requirements.txt, cee9136, since then, so if I'm

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Bug statuses definition in Fuel

2015-02-24 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Hi Dmitry, thanks for extending info on what is different in Fuel for Confirmed Fix Released statuses [1] It is pretty hard to go in history of the page now, but I think I like original OpenStack Imporance description in [2], than Fuel-specific [3]: - Critical = can't deploy anything and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Robert Collins
On 25 February 2015 at 13:13, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2015-02-24 11:27:05 + (+), Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [...] It would be reasonable for the vulnerability team to take the decision that they'll support fixes for master, and any branches that the stable team

Re: [openstack-dev] client library release versions

2015-02-24 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 2/24/2015 3:34 PM, Robert Collins wrote: Hi, in the cross project meeting a small but important thing came up. Most (all?) of our client libraries run with semver: x.y.z version numbers. http://semver.org/ and http://docs.openstack.org/developer/pbr/semver.html However we're seeing recent

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test guidelines

2015-02-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 02/24/2015 03:28 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: IMHO the CLI should have an option to returned raw JSON back instead of pretty tabled results as well. Um... isn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-02-24 11:27:05 + (+), Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [...] It would be reasonable for the vulnerability team to take the decision that they'll support fixes for master, and any branches that the stable team decide to support. [...] Well, it's worth noting that the VMT doesn't even

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] ML2 versus core plugin for OVN

2015-02-24 Thread Sukhdev Kapur
Folks, A great discussion. I am not expert at OVN, hence, want to ask a question. The answer may make a case that it should probably be a ML2 driver as oppose to monolithic plugin. Say a customer want to deploy an OVN based solution and use HW devices from one vendor for L2 and L3 (e.g. Arista

Re: [openstack-dev] Kerberos in OpenStack

2015-02-24 Thread Sanket Lawangare
Thanks a lot for taking out time and replying back Tim. Will let you know if i have any further questions. On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: You may also get some information from how we set up Kerberos at CERN at

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] novaclient functional test guidelines

2015-02-24 Thread Joe Gordon
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:18 PM, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:47, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: I'm happy if there are other theories about how we do these things, being the first functional test in the python-novaclient tree that creates and destroys

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Robert Collins
On 24 February 2015 at 22:53, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: I was writing this mail for the past few days, but the nova thread today prompted me to finish it off send it :-) ++ The first two observations strongly suggest that the choice of 6 months as a cycle length is

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle

2015-02-24 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-02-24 10:00:51 -0800 (-0800), Johannes Erdfelt wrote: [...] Recently, I have spent a lot more time waiting on reviews than I have spent writing the actual code. That's awesome, assuming what you mean here is that you've spent more time reviewing submitted code than writing more. That's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Bug statuses definition in Fuel

2015-02-24 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Mike, I introduced the Fuel specific bug priority descriptions in June 2014 [0], which may be why you were having trouble finding it in the recent changes. [0] https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Fuel%2FHow_to_contributediff=56952oldid=56951 I think you're using a weird definition of

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] some questions about bp filtering-weighing-with-driver-supplied-functions

2015-02-24 Thread Zhangli (ISSP)
Hi Duncan, Really thanks for replying and sorry for my delayed response due to Chinese new year. 1) Driver authors tend, in my experience, to know more than admins, so drivers should be able (where useful) to be able to set a default value to either filter expression or weighting expression

  1   2   >