Hi folks,
I've just joined the stable maintenance team for Sahara.
We have this review here, from OpenStack proposal bot:
https://review.openstack.org/158775/
Since it came from the proposal bot, there's no justification in the
commit message and no cherry pick.
I didn't see this case
On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:47, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I'm happy if there are other theories about how we do these things,
being the first functional test in the python-novaclient tree that
creates and destroys real resources, there isn't an established pattern
yet. But I think doing all
On 02/24/2015 02:34 PM, Trevor McKay wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just joined the stable maintenance team for Sahara.
We have this review here, from OpenStack proposal bot:
https://review.openstack.org/158775/
Since it came from the proposal bot, there's no justification in the
commit
During bugs triage and release notes preparation we often need to find
out whether a bug is a regression introduced by new code in the
current release, or may have been present in previous releases. In the
latter case, depending on its severity, it may need to be reflected in
the release notes,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
[...]
I think a lot of the frustration with our current cadence comes out of
the big stop everything (development, planning etc.), and stabilize the
release process. Which in turn isn't really
Sean,
thanks! I feel better already. I'll check out the review.
Trevor
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 14:39 -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/24/2015 02:34 PM, Trevor McKay wrote:
Hi folks,
I've just joined the stable maintenance team for Sahara.
We have this review here, from OpenStack
On 02/24/2015 03:21 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
mailto:berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:50:45AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/24/2015 07:48 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 02/24/2015
On Feb 24, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Right, I think to some degree novaclient is legacy code, and we should
focus on specific regressions and bugs without doing to much code change.
The future should be more focussed on openstacksdk and openstackclient.
IMO,
Hello All,
I've finally had some time to finish up the graduation work for oslo.reports
(previously
openstack.common.report), and it should be ready for review by the Oslo team.
The only thing
that I was unclear about was the sync required tools from oslo-incubator part.
oslo.reports does not
We saw the same issue elsewhere, and Doug had great explanation on how it
broke semver
https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg46533.html
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On 02/24/2015 03:28 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
IMHO the CLI should have an option to returned raw JSON back instead of
pretty tabled results as well.
Um... isn't that just the API calls?
I'm not sure creating a 3rd functional surface
Hi, in the cross project meeting a small but important thing came up.
Most (all?) of our client libraries run with semver: x.y.z version
numbers. http://semver.org/ and
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/pbr/semver.html
However we're seeing recent releases that are bumping .z inappropriately.
Ran the job manually on rax VM, provided by Jeremy. (Thank you Jeremy).
After running 971 test cases VM inaccessible for 569 ticks, then
continues... (Look at the console.log [1])
And also have a look at dstat log. [2]
The summary is:
==
Totals
==
Ran: 1125 tests in 5835. sec.
-
On 02/24/2015 01:47 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net
mailto:s...@dague.net wrote:
Towards the end of merging the regression test for the nova
volume-attach bug - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157959/ there was a
discussion
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:14:36PM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
Was:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/057578.html
There has been frustration with our current 6 month development
On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
IMHO the CLI should have an option to returned raw JSON back instead of
pretty tabled results as well.
Um... isn't that just the API calls?
I'm not sure creating a 3rd functional surface is really the answer
here, because we
A group of folks from HP is interested in starting an effort to run a
cloud as part of the Infrastructure program with the purpose of
providing resources to nodepool for OpenStack testing. HP is supplying
two racks of machines, and we will operate each as an independent cloud.
I think this is a
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Johannes Erdfelt johan...@erdfelt.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Agree on the pain of maintaining milestone plans though, which is why I
propose we get rid of most of it in Liberty. That will actually be
On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:50 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the release candidate
period is the only thing that makes your code drops actually usable.
It's the only moment in the cycle where integrators test. It's the only
moment in the cycle where developers work on bugs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+bug/1425262
mtreinish adjusted the cap on stable/icehouse here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158842/
jogo now has a change to explicitly pin all clients in stable/icehouse
to the version currently gated on:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:50:45AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/24/2015 07:48 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 02/24/2015 12:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 03:24:01PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
Here's another thought: is the big-bang integrated 6-month fixed release
cycle useful any more? Can we talk about using more of a moving train model
that doesn't have these long freeze cycles? At least for some of the
projects, I think
Agreed. It causes two problems:
1) 9 month delays in getting code into a release
2) Some projects consider something to be breakable, from a back
compatibility point of view, until it has made a formal release, which
means anybody cutting releases from anything other than final/stable is
facing
Hi Boris,
this idea is about the JSON files for each Murano application, which can be
used in Murano functional tests or in Rally tests with Rally jobs for each
commit to Murano engine and Murano applications repositories.
I like the idea to configure Rally jobs for Murano repositories and then
On 02/24/2015 01:28 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:54:31AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:54:31AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker,
it is just a sign that the project
On 24/02/15 11:02 +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:44:57AM +, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I was writing this mail for the past few days, but the nova thread
today prompted me to finish it off send it :-)
Thanks for doing
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker,
it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on providing more resources
to the teams impacted in that
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
I was writing this mail for the past few days, but the nova thread
today prompted me to finish it off send it :-)
Thanks for doing this. I think you're probably right that the current
release cycle has many negative impacts on the development
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker,
it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on providing more resources
to the teams impacted in that way.
What are the mechanisms whereby the project provides more
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 04:14:36PM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
Was:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-February/057578.html
There has been frustration with our current 6 month development cadence.
This is an attempt to explain those frustrations and propose a very rough
On 02/24/2015 12:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker,
it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 08:50:45AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote:
On 02/24/2015 07:48 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
On 02/24/2015 12:54 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
need to do more work. If
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 06:31 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP
Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com wrote on 02/23/2015
11:13:12 AM:
From: Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui sahid.ferdja...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 02/23/2015 11:17 AM
Subject: Re:
Tony Breeds t...@bakeyournoodle.com wrote on 02/21/2015 08:35:32 AM:
From: Tony Breeds t...@bakeyournoodle.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 02/21/2015 08:41 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] bp serial-ports
Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info writes:
I'd like to make sure that if Infra is saying that CI jobs on drivers
can gate that this is a substantial difference from what I have been
saying for a year, specifically that they can't and won't.
For the purposes of this conversation, the distinction
Hi,
For those who are interested and are planning to book travel soon, please do
keep in mind that Glance team is planning to have a halfday sprint on Friday of
the week of the summit. Besides, we will have fishbowl and work sessions during
the week.
Please feel free to reach out to me, if
FWIW, we tried to run our job in a rax provider VM (provided by ianw from
his personal account)
and we ran the tempest tests twice, but the OOM did not re-create. Of the 2
runs, one of the run
used the same PYTHONHASHSEED as we had in one of the failed runs, still no
oom.
Jeremy graciously agreed
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:49:29AM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:29 AM, Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
Couldn't find anything strong in the logs to back the reason for OOM.
At the time OOM happens, mysqld and java processes have the most RAM
Hi Everyone,
TripleO held a midcycle meetup from February 18th-20th in Seattle. Thanks to HP
for hosting the event! I wanted to send out a summary of what went on. We also
captured some notes on an etherpad[0].
The first order of business was that I volunteered to serve as PTL of TripleO
for the
Thanks Duncan.
It's commenting and it works (meaning it runs and it's able to detect
errors). Sometimes it gives a FAILURE but that's either due to the patch
(rare) or due to devstack (often).
Also logs are visible and included in the comment.
Eduard
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Duncan
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
That also provides a very concrete answer to will people show up.
Because if they do, and we get this horizontal refactoring happening,
then we get to the point of being able to change release cadences
faster. If they don't, we remain with the existing
On 02/24/2015 04:40 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
For cinder, we don't want to gate on drivers, and will be unhappy if that
gets turned on, so the story hasn't changed, Anita.
I think Jim was pointing out the technical possibility, which is a fine and
valid thing to point out. Cinder core are
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
What this actually means:
- Stop approving blueprints for specific stable releases, instead just
approve them and target them to milestones.
- Milestones stop becoming Kilo-1, Kilo-2, Kilo-3 etc. and just
become
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:19 AM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com
wrote:
On 24 February 2015 at 01:34, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
Russel and I have already merged the initial ML2 skeleton driver [1].
The thinking is that we can always revert to a non-ML2 driver if needed.
Hi everyone,
we've enabled job verify-fuel-library-python (see [1]) to test Python
scripts in Fuel Library code.
It is triggered for all commits to master branch in stackforge/fuel-library
Master currently passes the test, see [2]. Please check and rebase
your patchsets for this job to work.
In
OVN implementing it's own control plane isn't a good reason to make it a
monolithic plugin. Many of the ML2 drivers are for technologies with their
own control plane.
Going with the monolithic plugin only makes sense if you are certain that
you never want interoperability with other technologies
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
Towards the end of merging the regression test for the nova
volume-attach bug - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157959/ there was a
discussion around what style the functional tests should take.
Especially as that had a mix of
Hello Everyone,
My name is Sanket Lawangare. I am a graduate Student studying at The
University of Texas, at San Antonio. For my Master’s Thesis I am working on
the Identity component of OpenStack. My research is to investigate external
authentication with Identity(keystone) using Kerberos.
It doesn't support this at this time. There are no current plans to
make it work. I'm curious to know how you would like for this to work
in your deployment.
Carl
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, NAPIERALA, MARIA H mn1...@att.com wrote:
Does Neutron router support ECMP across multiple static
I think we're speculating a lot about what would be best for OVN whereas we
should probably just expose pro and cons of ML2 drivers vs standalone
plugin (as I said earlier on indeed it does not necessarily imply
monolithic *)
I reckon the job of the Neutron community is to provide a full picture
Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
What this actually means:
- Stop approving blueprints for specific stable releases, instead just
approve them and target them to milestones.
- Milestones stop becoming Kilo-1, Kilo-2, Kilo-3
Hello all,
We now have a work-in-progress patch up for review:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158697/
Feedback on our approach is much appreciated.
Many thanks,
John Davidge
OpenStack@Cisco
On 20/02/2015 18:28, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
On 02/24/2015 09:37 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
That also provides a very concrete answer to will people show up.
Because if they do, and we get this horizontal refactoring happening,
then we get to the point of being able to change release cadences
faster. If
On 02/24/2015 03:09 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
On 22/02/15 22:43 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 02/18/2015 06:37 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
Thanks for your comment, Miguel. Your suggestion is indeed very close
to the RESTful ideal.
However, I have a question for the entire API-WG. Our (proposed)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/24/2015 09:37 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
That also provides a very concrete answer to will people show up.
Because if they do, and we get this horizontal refactoring happening,
Thanks for the summary. A couple of comments inline.
On 02/24/2015 08:48 AM, James Slagle wrote:
Hi Everyone,
TripleO held a midcycle meetup from February 18th-20th in Seattle. Thanks to
HP
for hosting the event! I wanted to send out a summary of what went on. We also
captured some notes
Towards the end of merging the regression test for the nova
volume-attach bug - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157959/ there was a
discussion around what style the functional tests should take.
Especially as that had a mix of CLI and API calls in it.
Here are my thoughts for why that test ended
On 02/24/2015 07:48 AM, James Slagle wrote:
Hi Everyone,
TripleO held a midcycle meetup from February 18th-20th in Seattle. Thanks to
HP
for hosting the event! I wanted to send out a summary of what went on. We also
captured some notes on an etherpad[0].
The first order of business was
On 02/24/2015 12:33 PM, John Griffith wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:04 AM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com
mailto:dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/24/2015 09:37 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Sean Dague wrote:
That also provides a very concrete
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Agree on the pain of maintaining milestone plans though, which is why I
propose we get rid of most of it in Liberty. That will actually be
discussed at the cross-project meeting today:
On 12:47 Tue 24 Feb , Eduard Matei wrote:
The question is: does the CI need voting rights (validated) , or just
check/comment to be considered working?
See:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/tested-3rdParty-drivers#When_thirdparty_CI_voting_will_be_required.3F
--
Mike Perez
I wonder if there is a way we can easily abuse the extra routes extension
to do this? Maybe two routes to the same network would imply ECMP.
If not, maybe this can fit into a larger refactoring for route management
(dynamic routing, etc).
On Feb 24, 2015 11:02 AM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net
On 02/24/2015 06:55 AM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
Hi Ghanshyam,
2015-02-24 20:28 GMT+09:00 GHANSHYAM MANN ghanshyamm...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 6:48 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi ken1ohmi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Nova team is developing Nova v2.1 API + microversions in this cycle,
and the
I think it is better to keep such bugs open. Please see
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/granular-network-functions .
There are some related bugs here. One is fixed, another one is in progress,
two are closed. If bug is strictly coherent with blueprint (like
You may also get some information from how we set up Kerberos at CERN at
http://openstack-in-production.blogspot.fr/2014/10/kerberos-and-single-sign-on-with.html
From my understanding, the only connection is between Keystone and KDC. There
is a standard Keystone token issues based off the
On 02/24/2015 01:53 PM, Sanket Lawangare wrote:
Hello Everyone,
My name is Sanket Lawangare. I am a graduate Student studying at The
University of Texas, at San Antonio.For my Master’s Thesis I am
working on the Identity component of OpenStack. My research is to
investigate external
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, at 04:42 PM, Solly Ross wrote:
Hello All,
I've finally had some time to finish up the graduation work for
oslo.reports (previously
openstack.common.report), and it should be ready for review by the Oslo
team. The only thing
that I was unclear about was the sync
Hello all,
For creating Networks, Images, Volumes etc, the name field is marked as
mandatory on the Horizon UI whereas, in their corresponding create
commands on the cli it is an optional field ( which is as per the API
reference documents)
Why is this inconsistency?
Secondly, when we create
I think this is really neat. As a 3rd party ci operator managing a small
nodepool cloud, leveraging #3 would be really great!
Ramy
-Original Message-
From: James E. Blair [mailto:cor...@inaugust.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 1:19 PM
To: openstack-in...@lists.openstack.org
Cc:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015, at 04:28, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
Along with the below, if push comes to shove, OpenStack Foundation could
probably try a milder variant (obviously, not all activities can be
categorized as 'critical path') of Linux Foundation's Critical
Infrastructure Protection
Hi David,
-Original Message-
From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 4:19 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Tempest] Tempest will deny extra
properties on Nova v2/v2.1 API
Hi
I am unable to find script for run test cases of python-clients in juno
release.
novaclients are shilfed into dist-packages but there is no script for run the
test cases.
Please help me to come out from this problem.
Thanks,
Regards
Amandeep Rattenpal
Asst. System Engineer,
Mail to:
Hi,
I am new to OpenStack (and am particularly interested in networking). I am
getting a bit confused by this discussion. Aren’t there already a few
monolithic plugins (that is what I could understand from reading the Networking
chapter of the OpenStack Cloud Administrator Guide. Table 7.3
There is a -2 (from me). And this was done from the auto-abandon script
which I try to run once a month.
As Kevin said, the suggestion multiple times was to do a StackForge project
for this work, that's the best way forward here.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 5:01 PM, CARVER, PAUL pc2...@att.com
Those scripts have mostly moved into oslotest, so they don't need to be
synced any more to be used. If you have all of your code, and it follows
the cookiecutter template, we can look at it and propose post-import
tweaks. What's the URL for the repository?
Heh, whoops. I should probably
So are we talking about using script to eliminate unnecessary new vif types?
Then, a little confusion that why this BP[1] is postponed to L, and
this BP[2] is merged in K.
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146914/
[2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148805/
In fact [2] can be replaced by
Maybe I'm misreading review.o.o, but I don't see the -2. There was a -2 from
Salvatore Orlando with the comment The -2 on this patch is only to deter
further comments and a link to 140292, but 140292 has a comment from Kyle
saying it's been abandoned in favor of going back to 96149. Are we in a
On 23 February 2015 at 13:54, Michael Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but the register_after_fork seems to apply only to
the higher level Process abstraction. If someone calls os.fork(), as is
the case now, there's no hook to use.
Hence the solution I have in place
On 2015-02-25 01:02:07 +0530 (+0530), Bharat Kumar wrote:
[...]
After running 971 test cases VM inaccessible for 569 ticks
[...]
Glad you're able to reproduce it. For the record that is running
their 8GB performance flavor with a CentOS 7 PVHVM base image. The
steps to recreate are
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder if there is a way we can easily abuse the extra routes extension to
do this? Maybe two routes to the same network would imply ECMP.
It's a good idea, and we deploy a system with similar concept(by extra
routes) by
On 24 February 2015 at 01:07, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote:
Lazy-Stacker summary:
...
In the medium term, there are a few things we might consider for Neutron's
built-in IPAM.
1) Move the allocation logic out of the driver, thus making IPAM an
independent service. The API
Hi
I am trying to just get started with openstack commits and wanted to start by
fixing some documentation bugs. I assigned 3 bugs which seem to be in the same
file/area
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-training-guides/+bug/1380153
cor...@inaugust.com (James E. Blair) writes:
A group of folks from HP is interested in starting an effort to run a
cloud as part of the Infrastructure program with the purpose of
providing resources to nodepool for OpenStack testing. HP is supplying
two racks of machines, and we will operate
On 25 February 2015 at 11:18, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I was hoping to do a sqlalchemy-migrate release this week so I'm interested
in not screwing that up. :)
The current release is 0.9.4 and there was one change to requirements.txt,
cee9136, since then, so if I'm
Hi Dmitry,
thanks for extending info on what is different in Fuel for Confirmed Fix
Released statuses [1]
It is pretty hard to go in history of the page now, but I think I like
original OpenStack Imporance description in [2], than Fuel-specific [3]:
- Critical = can't deploy anything and
On 25 February 2015 at 13:13, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-02-24 11:27:05 + (+), Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
It would be reasonable for the vulnerability team to take the decision
that they'll support fixes for master, and any branches that the stable
team
On 2/24/2015 3:34 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
Hi, in the cross project meeting a small but important thing came up.
Most (all?) of our client libraries run with semver: x.y.z version
numbers. http://semver.org/ and
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/pbr/semver.html
However we're seeing recent
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 02/24/2015 03:28 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Feb 24, 2015, at 1:49 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
IMHO the CLI should have an option to returned raw JSON back instead of
pretty tabled results as well.
Um... isn't
On 2015-02-24 11:27:05 + (+), Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
It would be reasonable for the vulnerability team to take the decision
that they'll support fixes for master, and any branches that the stable
team decide to support.
[...]
Well, it's worth noting that the VMT doesn't even
Folks,
A great discussion. I am not expert at OVN, hence, want to ask a question.
The answer may make a case that it should probably be a ML2 driver as
oppose to monolithic plugin.
Say a customer want to deploy an OVN based solution and use HW devices from
one vendor for L2 and L3 (e.g. Arista
Thanks a lot for taking out time and replying back Tim. Will let you know
if i have any further questions.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote:
You may also get some information from how we set up Kerberos at CERN at
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:18 PM, melanie witt melwi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 24, 2015, at 9:47, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
I'm happy if there are other theories about how we do these things,
being the first functional test in the python-novaclient tree that
creates and destroys
On 24 February 2015 at 22:53, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
I was writing this mail for the past few days, but the nova thread
today prompted me to finish it off send it :-)
++
The first two observations strongly suggest that the choice of 6
months as a cycle length is
On 2015-02-24 10:00:51 -0800 (-0800), Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
[...]
Recently, I have spent a lot more time waiting on reviews than I
have spent writing the actual code.
That's awesome, assuming what you mean here is that you've spent
more time reviewing submitted code than writing more. That's
Mike,
I introduced the Fuel specific bug priority descriptions in June 2014
[0], which may be why you were having trouble finding it in the recent
changes.
[0]
https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=Fuel%2FHow_to_contributediff=56952oldid=56951
I think you're using a weird definition of
On 02/24/2015 05:46 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-02-24 10:00:51 -0800 (-0800), Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
[...]
Recently, I have spent a lot more time waiting on reviews than I
have spent writing the actual code.
That's awesome, assuming what you mean here is that you've spent
more time
I replied to almost exactly this email off-list and so thought i would copy my
reply to -dev.
- Original Message -
From: Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com
To: Sanket Lawangare sanket.lawang...@gmail.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 6:39:14 AM
Subject: Re: Kerberos in
On 24/02/15 19:27, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:05:17PM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
[...]
First, Daniel, thank you for the well-written and thought-through post.
I have some comments on translation specifically which I hope can shed
some light
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo