Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread Clay Gerrard
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Why do you say auto-abandon is the wrong tool? I've no problem with the 1 week warning if somebody wants to implement it - I can see the value. A change-set that has been ignored for X weeks is pretty much the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-02 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, thanks for a clear write-up of the matter and food for thought. I think the idea

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-02 Thread Joe Gordon
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, thanks for a clear write-up of the matter and food for thought. I think the idea

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-02 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSSN 0044] Older versions of noVNC allow session theft

2015-03-02 Thread Solly Ross
Hi! I just wanted to note that noVNC 0.5.1 is slated to be in Fedora 22 and is currently in EPEL testing for EPEL 6 and EPEL 7 (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/novnc). Best Regards, Solly Ross - Original Message - From: Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] gabbi: A tool for declarative testing of APIs

2015-03-02 Thread Steve Baker
On 03/03/15 00:56, Chris Dent wrote: I (and a few others) have been using gabbi[1] for a couple of months now and it has proven very useful and evolved a bit so I thought it would be worthwhile to followup my original message and give an update. Some recent reviews[1] give a sample of how it

[openstack-dev] [OSSN 0044] Older versions of noVNC allow session theft

2015-03-02 Thread Nathan Kinder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Older versions of noVNC allow session theft - --- ### Summary ### Commonly packaged versions of noVNC allow an attacker to hijack user sessions even when TLS is enabled. noVNC fails to set the secure flag when setting cookies containing an

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Doug Wiegley's message of 2015-03-02 12:47:14 -0800: On Mar 2, 2015, at 1:13 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: Stefano branched this thread from an older one to talk about auto-abandon. In the previous thread, I believe I explained my concerns, but since the

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 13:35 -0800, Clay Gerrard wrote: I think Tom's suggested help us help you is a great pre-abandon warning. In swift as often as not the last message ended with something like you can catch me on freenode in #openstack-swift if you have any questions Good, this thread

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Shared storage support

2015-03-02 Thread Rochelle Grober
-Original Message- From: Jay Pipes Sent Monday, March 02, 2015 16:24 On 02/25/2015 06:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:08:32PM +, Gary Kotton wrote: I understand that this is a high or critical bug but I think that we need to discuss more on it and try

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-02 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2015-03-02 17:08:15 -0800: On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:45 AM, James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:05 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [...] The key observations

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Shared storage support

2015-03-02 Thread Jay Pipes
On 02/25/2015 06:41 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:08:32PM +, Gary Kotton wrote: I understand that this is a high or critical bug but I think that we need to discuss more on it and try have a more robust model. What I'm not seeing from the bug description is just

Re: [openstack-dev] [Devstack] Can't start service nova-novncproxy

2015-03-02 Thread Li, Chen
Sorry, what you mean Double-check no make sure that it's enabled ? I do set the following in my local.conf: enable_service n-nonvc NOVA_VNC_ENABLED=True NOVNCPROXY_URL=http://192.168.6.91:6080/vnc_auto.html; VNCSERVER_LISTEN=0.0.0.0

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-02 Thread James Bottomley
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:05 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [...] The key observations The first key observation from the schedule is that although we have a 6 month release cycle, we in fact make 4 releases in that six months because

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-02 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 9:45 AM, James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote: On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 12:05 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Daniel P. Berrange wrote: [...] The key observations The first key observation from the schedule is that

[openstack-dev] [stable] [Glance] Nomination for glance-stable-maint

2015-03-02 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Hi all, I would like to propose Zhi Yan Liu for the role of stable maintainer for Glance program. Zhi Yan is currently a Glance core member as well as a go-to person for various features in Glance. He is also handling quite well the additional responsibility of Oslo liaison for Glance.

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread Tom Fifield
On 03/03/15 05:35, Clay Gerrard wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Why do you say auto-abandon is the wrong tool? I've no problem with the 1 week warning if somebody wants to implement it - I can see

[openstack-dev] [tempest] API testing coverage in tempest

2015-03-02 Thread Rohan Kanade
Hi, So i have been tracking API test coverage in tempest in a ad-hoc way where i check the actual tempest tests and the API documentation for that specific component eg. Neutron Is there a better way or documentation maintained by Tempest team for data about API test coverage per OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler sub-group meeting agenda 3/3

2015-03-02 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Meeting on #openstack-meeting at 1500 UTC (8:00AM MST) 1) Status on cleanup work - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gantt/kilo (No need to discuss the `Remove direct nova DB access’ spec, it’s been approved ☺ -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale Ph:

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Need +A (workflow +1) for https://review.openstack.org/156940

2015-03-02 Thread Deepak Shetty
Hi all, Can someone give +A to https://review.openstack.org/156940 - we have the rest. Need to get this merged for glusterfs CI to pass the snapshot_when_volume_in_use testcases. thanx, deepak __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-02 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Hi all, After having thoroughly thought about the proposed rotation and evaluating the pros and cons of the same at this point of time, I would like to make an alternate proposal. New Proposal: 1. We should go ahead with adding more core members now. 2. Come up with a plan and give

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.policy] guraduation status

2015-03-02 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015, at 05:01 AM, Osanai, Hisashi wrote: oslo.policy folks, I'm thinking about realization of policy-based access control in swift using oslo.policy [1] so I would like to know oslo.policy's status for graduation. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] Kerberos in OpenStack

2015-03-02 Thread Adam Young
Posting response to the mailing list, as I suspect others have these questions. I understand that in the current proposed implementation only keystone runs on apache- httpd. * * *1. My question is that- is it possible to move Nova server on the apache-httpd server just like the way

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-02 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015, at 10:57 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, thanks for a clear write-up of the matter and food for thought. I think the idea of having more smooth development mode that would not make people to wait for 6+ months

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][openstackclient] transferring maintenance of cliff to the OpenStack client team

2015-03-02 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 26/02/15 19:25 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: +1 to the move! +1 from me too On Feb 26, 2015 6:43 PM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: On 02/26/2015 03:57 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: The team behind the unified command line tool is preparing to ask the TC to allow us to

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread Doug Wiegley
On Mar 2, 2015, at 1:13 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: Stefano branched this thread from an older one to talk about auto-abandon. In the previous thread, I believe I explained my concerns, but since the topic split, perhaps it would be good to summarize why this is an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Adding vendor drivers in Ironic

2015-03-02 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote: Hi, I am just relaying pain-points that we encountered in neutron. As I have said below it makes the development process a lot quicker for people working on external drivers. I personally believe that it fragments the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][horizon]Proper error handling/propagation to UI

2015-03-02 Thread Eduard Matei
@Duncan: I tried with lvmdriver-1, fails with error: ImageCopyFailure: Failed to copy image to volume: qemu-img: /dev/mapper/stack--volumes--lvmdriver--1-volume--e8323fc5--8ce4--4676--bbec--0a85efd866fc: error while converting raw: Could not open device: Permission denied It's been configured

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Adding vendor drivers in Ironic

2015-03-02 Thread Anita Kuno
On 02/28/2015 09:36 PM, Ramakrishnan G wrote: You may not realize you do a disservice to those reading this post and those reviewing future patches if you set unreasonable expectations. Telling others that they can expect a patch merged in the same day is not reasonable, even if that has

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Neutron] ML2 + Nexus :: update_port_precommit ERROR

2015-03-02 Thread Rich Curran (rcurran)
Hi Adam – Please email me directly w/ the log information. Thanks, Rich From: Adam Lawson [mailto:alaw...@aqorn.com] Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 11:02 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Neutron] ML2 + Nexus ::

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Change diagnostic snapshot compression algoritm

2015-03-02 Thread Dmitry Pyzhov
Actually, we have some improvements with snapshots size and we are going to rethink our snapshots in upcoming releases. Miroslav, could you clarify the importance of this change in 6.1? On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Tomasz Napierala tnapier...@mirantis.com wrote: Guys, We have requests for

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] A new wiki page is created for Fuel Plugins

2015-03-02 Thread Irina Povolotskaya
Hi to everyone, I'd like to inform you that a new wiki page was created for Fuel Plugins - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fuel/Plugins. Beginning with 6.0 release, Fuel supports Pluggable Architecture; that means, you can download and install plugins for Fuel or even develop your own. The wiki

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Functional tests for EC2-API in nova

2015-03-02 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Alex, It's better do a experimental one first before trying to a non-voting: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/tree/zuul/layout.yaml#n1509 -- dims On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Alexandre Levine alev...@cloudscaling.com wrote: All, We've finished setting up the

[openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Functional tests for EC2-API in nova

2015-03-02 Thread Alexandre Levine
All, We've finished setting up the functional testing for the stackforge EC2 API project. New test suite consists of 96 API and scenario tests covering almost (tags functionality and client tokens absent) all of the functionality initially covered by original EC2 API tests in Tempest and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] gabbi: A tool for declarative testing of APIs

2015-03-02 Thread Chris Dent
I (and a few others) have been using gabbi[1] for a couple of months now and it has proven very useful and evolved a bit so I thought it would be worthwhile to followup my original message and give an update. Some recent reviews[1] give a sample of how it can be used to validate an existing API

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][glusterfs] Online Snapshot fails with GlusterFS

2015-03-02 Thread Duncan Thomas
I'm assuming your mean the following lines in nova policy.js: compute_extension:os-assisted-volume-snapshots:create:rule:admin_api, compute_extension:os-assisted-volume-snapshots:delete:rule:admin_api These 2 calls are not intended to be made directly via an end user, but via cinder, as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Adding vendor drivers in Ironic

2015-03-02 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 02/28/2015 07:28 AM, Ramakrishnan G wrote: Hello All, Hi! This is about adding vendor drivers in Ironic. In Kilo, we have many vendor drivers getting added in Ironic which is a very good thing. But something I noticed is that, most of these reviews have lots of hardware-specific code

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] How to check admin authentication?

2015-03-02 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
2015-02-27 17:27 GMT+01:00 Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Dmitry Tantsur dtant...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all! This (presumably) pretty basic question tortures me for several months already, so I kindly seek for help here. I'm working on a

Re: [openstack-dev] Need help in configuring keystone

2015-03-02 Thread Fargetta Marco
Hi Akshik, if you look at the log you find these lines: 2015-02-27 22:36:38 CRIT Shibboleth.Application : no MetadataProvider available, configuration is probably unusable 2015-02-27 22:36:38 INFO Shibboleth.Application : no TrustEngine specified or installed, using default chain

Re: [openstack-dev] Need help in configuring keystone

2015-03-02 Thread Marek Denis
Akshik, When you are beginning an adventure with saml, shibboleth and so on, it's helpful to start with fetching auto-generated shibboleth2.xml file from testshib.org . This should cover most of your use-cases, at least in the testing environment. Marek

[openstack-dev] [oslo.policy] guraduation status

2015-03-02 Thread Osanai, Hisashi
oslo.policy folks, I'm thinking about realization of policy-based access control in swift using oslo.policy [1] so I would like to know oslo.policy's status for graduation. [1] https://github.com/openstack/oslo-specs/blob/master/specs/kilo/graduate-policy.rst Thanks in advance, Hisashi

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.policy] guraduation status

2015-03-02 Thread Jordan Pittier
Hi, FYI there might be something related to what you plan : https://github.com/stackforge/swiftpolicy/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89568/ The project is abandoned but the initial goal was to have the code somehow proposed to be merged in Openstack Swift. Feel free to have a look a continue

[openstack-dev] [nova] what's the merge plan for current proposed microversions?

2015-03-02 Thread Sean Dague
This change for the additional attributes for ec2 looks like it's basically ready to go, except it has the wrong microversion on it (as they anticipated the other changes landing ahead of them) - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155853 What's the plan for merging the outstanding microversions? I

[openstack-dev] New Driver for LBaaS enhancement

2015-03-02 Thread liuxin
Hello,everyone: we come from China, we have implemented a LBaaS driver for openstack. This driver can drive an LoadBalancer device which also has a security filter functionality for vm instance, including DDos shield, web access control and so on . We provide security through LoadBalancer for

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] how safe is it to change NoAuthMiddlewareBase?

2015-03-02 Thread Sean Dague
On 02/28/2015 11:51 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 02/26/2015 04:27 AM, Sean Dague wrote: In trying to move the flavor manage negative tests out of Tempest and into the Nova functional tree, I ran into one set of tests which are permissions checking. Basically that a regular user isn't allowed to do

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-02 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, thanks for a clear write-up of the matter and food for thought. I think the idea of having more smooth development mode that would not make people to wait for 6+ months to release a new feature is great. It's insane to expect that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Should we run tests on all supported database engines?

2015-03-02 Thread Serg Melikyan
Hi Andrew, I think we should isolate DB access layer and test this layer extensively on MySQL PostgreSQL. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Andrew Pashkin apash...@mirantis.com wrote: There is a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1419743 It's about that search on packages is failing

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread James E. Blair
John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com writes: For what it's worth, at one point the Cinder project setup an auto-abandon job that did purge items that had a negative mark either from a reviewer or from Jenkins and had not been updated in over two weeks. This had absolutely nothing to do

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Should we run tests on all supported database engines?

2015-03-02 Thread Andrew Pashkin
There is a bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1419743 It's about that search on packages is failing if use Postgres as DB backend. The fix is pretty easy there, but how this bug should be tested? I see such options: 1) Run all tests for all DBs that we support. 2) Run some tests for

[openstack-dev] python-novaclient 2.22.0 released

2015-03-02 Thread Matt Riedemann
This is a bug fix and feature release. Available here: http://tarballs.openstack.org/python-novaclient/python-novaclient-2.22.0.tar.gz https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-novaclient/2.22.0 Changes: mriedem@ubuntu:~/git/python-novaclient$ git log --oneline --no-merges 2.21.0..2.22.0

Re: [openstack-dev] [tempest][glusterfs] Online Snapshot fails with GlusterFS

2015-03-02 Thread Deepak Shetty
Duncan, Attila, Thanks for your response. We found a issue when using os_priviledge_user_name which is when we sent this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/156940/ Post that we used admin user, its password and admin tenant in cinder.conf to make it work But we thought that using admin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress]How to add tempest tests for testing murano driver

2015-03-02 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Hi Hong, Aaron started working on this, but we don’t have anything in place yet, as far as I know. He’s a starting point. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157166/ Tim On Feb 26, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Wong, Hong hong.w...@hp.commailto:hong.w...@hp.com wrote: Hi Aaron, I am new to congress and

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread Duncan Thomas
Why do you say auto-abandon is the wrong tool? I've no problem with the 1 week warning if somebody wants to implement it - I can see the value. A change-set that has been ignored for X weeks is pretty much the dictionary definition of abandoned, and restoring it is one mouse click. Maybe put

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Should we run tests on all supported database engines?

2015-03-02 Thread Andrew Pashkin
What kind of layer do you mean? Right now we have some kind of isolation in the form of separate functions for DB lookups. For example for this case its murano.db.catalog.api.package_search [1]. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] olso.db 1.5.0 release

2015-03-02 Thread Mike Bayer
Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 2/26/2015 3:22 AM, Victor Sergeyev wrote: Hi folks! The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of: oslo.db - OpenStack common DB library Changes from the previous release: $ git log --oneline --no-merges 1.4.1..1.5.0

Re: [openstack-dev] [Devstack] Can't start service nova-novncproxy

2015-03-02 Thread Solly Ross
Double-check no make sure that it's enabled. A couple months ago, noVNC got removed from the standard install because devstack was installing it from GitHub. - Original Message - From: Chen Li chen...@intel.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-02 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/26/2015 01:06 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 02/24/2015 12:27 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: I'm actually trying to judge it from the POV of users, not just developers. I find it pretty untenable that in the fast moving world of cloud, users

Re: [openstack-dev] olso.db 1.5.0 release

2015-03-02 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/02/2015 05:51 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 2/26/2015 3:22 AM, Victor Sergeyev wrote: Hi folks! The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of: oslo.db - OpenStack common DB

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting minutes - 03/02/2015

2015-03-02 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Thanks for coming to our team meeting today. Meeting minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-03-02-16.00.html http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-03-02-16.00.html Full log:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress][Delegation] Initial workflow design

2015-03-02 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Inline. On Feb 27, 2015, at 6:40 AM, ruby.krishnasw...@orange.commailto:ruby.krishnasw...@orange.com wrote: My first suggestion: why don’t we set up call together with Ramki, Yathi, Debo, as soon as possible ? - How to go forward concretely with the 8 steps for the PoC (details

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress][Delegation] Initial workflow design

2015-03-02 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Inline. On Feb 26, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Ramki Krishnan r...@brocade.commailto:r...@brocade.com wrote: 1) Ruby: One of the issues highlighted in OpenStack (scheduler) and also elsewhere (e.g. Omega scheduler by google) is : Reading “host utilization” state from the data bases and DB (nova:host

[openstack-dev] [all] oslo.log 0.4.0 release

2015-03-02 Thread Doug Hellmann
The Oslo team is pleased to announce the release of: oslo.log 0.4.0: oslo.log library This release includes a critical bug fix for nova. For more details, please see the git log history below and: http://launchpad.net/oslo.log/+milestone/0.4.0 Please report issues through launchpad:

[openstack-dev] [Infra] Meeting Tuesday March 3rd at 19:00 UTC

2015-03-02 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
Hi everyone, The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is having our next weekly meeting on Tuesday March 3rd, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting Meeting agenda available here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is welcome to to add agenda items) Everyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-02 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Daniel, thanks for a clear write-up of the matter and food for thought. I think the idea of having more smooth development mode that would not make people to wait

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][horizon]Proper error handling/propagation to UI

2015-03-02 Thread Eduard Matei
Thanks Avishay. In our case the middle layer (our storage appliance) doesn't allow a snapshot to be deleted if it has clones due to an internal implementation that tries to optimize storage by using a Dependency tree where the base volume is the root of the tree and snapshots or clones are nodes

[openstack-dev] [Ironic][TripleO] IPMI controller for OpenStack instances

2015-03-02 Thread Ben Nemec
It's been quite a while since my last QuintupleO update, mostly due to excessive busy-ness, but I've been asked about it enough times since then that I decided to make time for it. I made another blog post with more details [1], but the gist is that I have a pyghmi-based IPMI controller for

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][horizon]Proper error handling/propagation to UI

2015-03-02 Thread Avishay Traeger
Sorry, I meant to say that the expected behavior is that volumes are independent entities, and therefore you should be able to delete a snapshot even if it has volumes created from it (just like you should be able to delete a volume that has clones from it). The exception is that Cinder will not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress][Delegation] Initial workflow design

2015-03-02 Thread Tim Hinrichs
Hi Ramki, Good suggestion. I added a paragraph at the top of the doc in the Overview section to explain what Delegation means and mentioned that some policies won’t be delegated. Tim On Feb 26, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Ramki Krishnan r...@brocade.commailto:r...@brocade.com wrote: Hi Tim, All,

Re: [openstack-dev] Hyper-V Nova CI Infrastructure

2015-03-02 Thread Anita Kuno
On 03/01/2015 09:13 PM, kwon-ho lee wrote: Hello, OpenStack dev members, Is there any problem on Hyper-V Nova CI Infrastructure? I don't know why i failed my petch set. My first patch set was succeeded , and then i changed the commit message, then failed on Hyper-V test. Could you

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread James E. Blair
Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com writes: Why do you say auto-abandon is the wrong tool? I've no problem with the 1 week warning if somebody wants to implement it - I can see the value. A change-set that has been ignored for X weeks is pretty much the dictionary definition of abandoned,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-02 Thread Luis Pabon
What is the status on virtfs? I am not sure if it is being maintained. Does anyone know? - Luis - Original Message - From: Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful

2015-03-02 Thread Kyle Mestery
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 12:00 -0700, Doug Wiegley wrote: Why do you feel the need to keep them? Do your regularly look at older patches? Do you know anyone that does? I don't think that's the point. The point is

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread Doug Wiegley
On Mar 2, 2015, at 11:44 AM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com writes: Why do you say auto-abandon is the wrong tool? I've no problem with the 1 week warning if somebody wants to implement it - I can see the value. A change-set that has been

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful

2015-03-02 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 12:00 -0700, Doug Wiegley wrote: Why do you feel the need to keep them? Do your regularly look at older patches? Do you know anyone that does? I don't think that's the point. The point is to try improving contributor's life by providing them one last useful comment

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread James E. Blair
Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com writes: A default query that edited out old, jenkins failing, and -2 stuff would be helpful. A default or easy query that highlighted things relevant to the current milestone's blueprints and bugs would be SUPER useful to guiding folks towards the

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread James E. Blair
Stefano branched this thread from an older one to talk about auto-abandon. In the previous thread, I believe I explained my concerns, but since the topic split, perhaps it would be good to summarize why this is an issue. 1) A core reviewer forcefully abandoning a change contributed by someone

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-02 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 12:52 PM, James E. Blair cor...@inaugust.com wrote: Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com writes: A default query that edited out old, jenkins failing, and -2 stuff would be helpful. A default or easy query that highlighted things relevant to the current

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] gabbi: A tool for declarative testing of APIs

2015-03-02 Thread Jay Pipes
On 03/02/2015 03:56 AM, Chris Dent wrote: I (and a few others) have been using gabbi[1] for a couple of months now and it has proven very useful and evolved a bit so I thought it would be worthwhile to followup my original message and give an update. Some recent reviews[1] give a sample of how

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Liberty specs are now open

2015-03-02 Thread Michael Still
Hi, this is just a quick note to let you know that Liberty specs are now open for Nova. By open I mean that it is possible to upload such a spec, but I wouldn't expect to see much review effort on these until Kilo is ready. If authors of previously approved specs (Juno or Kilo) want to use the