Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Output on stderr

2015-03-04 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Wednesday, March 4, 2015, David Stanek dsta...@dstanek.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS abhishek.tal...@tcs.com javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','abhishek.tal...@tcs.com'); wrote: While working on a bug for keystoneclient I have replaced sys.exit with

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Issue when upgrading from Juno to Kilo due to agent report_state RPC namespace patch

2015-03-04 Thread Assaf Muller
Hello everyone, I'd like to highlight an issue with: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/154670/ According to my understanding, most deployments upgrade the controllers first and compute/network nodes later. During that time period, all agents will fail to report state as they're sending the

[openstack-dev] [nova] Plans to fix numa_topology related issues with migration/resize/evacuate

2015-03-04 Thread Wensley, Barton
Hi, I have been exercising the numa topology related features in kilo (cpu pinning, numa topology, huge pages) and have seen that there are issues when an operation moves an instance between compute nodes. In summary, the numa_topology is not recalculated for the destination node, which results

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] SFC USe Case

2015-03-04 Thread Yapeng Wu
Venkat, Service Function chaining (redirect action) is not supported right now. Yapeng From: groupbasedpolicy-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:groupbasedpolicy-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Venkatrangan G - ERS, HCL Tech Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 4:38 AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] The None and 'none' for CONF.libvirt.cpu_mode

2015-03-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 02:52:06PM +, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: Hi, Daniel I'm a bit confused of the None/'none' for CONF.libvirt.cpu_mode. Per my understanding, None means there is no configuration provided and libvirt will select the default value based on the virt_type, none means

[openstack-dev] [sahara] team meeting Mar 5 1800 UTC

2015-03-04 Thread Sergey Lukjanov
Hi folks, We'll be having the Sahara team meeting in #openstack-meeting-alt channel. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/SaharaAgenda#Next_meetings http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Sahara+Meetingiso=20150305T18 -- Sincerely yours, Sergey Lukjanov Sahara

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Issue when upgrading from Juno to Kilo due to agent report_state RPC namespace patch

2015-03-04 Thread Miguel Ángel Ajo
I agree with Assaf, this is an issue across updates, and we may want (if that’s technically possible) to provide access to those functions with/without namespace. Or otherwise think about reverting for now until we find a migration strategy

Re: [openstack-dev] Python 3 is dead, long live Python 3

2015-03-04 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/2015 03:37 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2015, at 07:56 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: On 02/02/2015 05:15 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: After a long wait and much testing, we've merged a change[1] which moves the remainder of

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] scheduler_default_filters are assumed to be work with 'create' only?

2015-03-04 Thread Pradip Mukhopadhyay
Hello Experts, What we're trying to do is that: passing volume-type in get_pools() and filter out the pools matching (well, string matching) with the extra-specs k,v pair that may be present in the volume-type. So we were looking into the create_volume flow. Inside the filter_scheduler's

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-04 Thread Doug Hellmann
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015, at 07:24 AM, Alexis Lee wrote: John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com writes: ​Should we just rename this thread to Sensitivity training for contributors? Culture plays a role in shaping ones expectations here. I was lucky enough to grow up in open source culture,

[openstack-dev] [oslo][messaging][zmq] Discussion on zmq driver design issues

2015-03-04 Thread ozamiatin
Hi, By this e-mail I'd like to start a discussion about current zmq driver internal design problems I've found out. I wish to collect here all proposals and known issues. I hope this discussion will be continued on Liberty design summit. And hope it will drive our further zmq driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Plans to fix numa_topology related issues with migration/resize/evacuate

2015-03-04 Thread Nikola Đipanov
On 03/04/2015 03:17 PM, Wensley, Barton wrote: Hi, I have been exercising the numa topology related features in kilo (cpu pinning, numa topology, huge pages) and have seen that there are issues when an operation moves an instance between compute nodes. In summary, the numa_topology is not

Re: [openstack-dev] [TC][Magnum][Containers] Magnum - OpenStack Containers Service

2015-03-04 Thread Adrian Otto
+TC topic to subject line in accordance with astute suggestions. On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: OpenStack Devs, There is an item [1] on the 2015-03-10 TC meeting agenda [2] that I would like to highlight so discussion can commence prior to voting.

[openstack-dev] [Congress] murano-driver review

2015-03-04 Thread Tran, Steven
Hi core reviewers, I have a review for murano-driver improvement that's waiting for approval from core reviewers. Please take a look at your convenience. I just want to remind so it won't slip your attention. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158924/ Thanks, -Steven

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstackclient] doodle for meeting time selection

2015-03-04 Thread Steve Martinelli
+1, lets do this! Lin Hua Cheng os.lch...@gmail.com wrote on 03/04/2015 12:13:22 PM: From: Lin Hua Cheng os.lch...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 03/04/2015 12:21 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] The None and 'none' for CONF.libvirt.cpu_mode

2015-03-04 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:24:53PM +, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: Daniel, thanks for your clarification. Another related question is, what will be the guest's real cpu model is the cpu_model is None? This is about a reported regression at The guest CPU will be unspecified - it will be some

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstackclient] doodle for meeting time selection

2015-03-04 Thread Ian Cordasco
+1 On 3/4/15, 08:01, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2015, at 06:17 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: As we discussed in the meeting today, I’ve created a Doodle to coordinate a good day and time

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-04 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Csaba Henk ch...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de To: Csaba Henk ch...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Cc:

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Specific Juno version

2015-03-04 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 17:42 +0200, Eduard Matei wrote: Is there a way to specify the Juno version to be installed using devstack. Let's please reserve this list for discussions about the *future* of OpenStack development, not questions about using its tools. Please, everybody, help us stay

[openstack-dev] [Magnum][Containers] Magnum - OpenStack Containers Service

2015-03-04 Thread Adrian Otto
OpenStack Devs, There is an item [1] on the 2015-03-10 TC meeting agenda [2] that I would like to highlight so discussion can commence prior to voting. Magnum’s contributors have indicated our intent to join the OpenStack namespace in accordance with our new governance requirements [3]. I will

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-04 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-03-04 02:19:48 -0800: James Bottomley wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:59 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: James Bottomley wrote: Actually, this is possible: look at Linux, it freezes for 10 weeks of a 12 month release cycle (or 6 weeks of an 8

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] devstack vpnaas and l3 router

2015-03-04 Thread Sridhar Ramaswamy
Hi Andreas, vpnaas (i.e. its agent) is a superset of l3-router and it includes the functionality of the later. Hence you just need to configure either one of them. q-l3 if you don't need vpnaas and q-vpn if you need both vpnaas and l3. Hope this helps. - Sridhar On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:18 AM,

[openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] devstack vpnaas and l3 router

2015-03-04 Thread Andreas Scheuring
Hello everybody, is there a reason why devstack is only able to either deploy vpnaas or l3-router? Nevertheless both services are enabled in the local.conf on the HowToInstall Page [1]. But the code says it's a either or [2] (line 725). if is_service_enabled q-vpn; then run_process q-vpn

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] The None and 'none' for CONF.libvirt.cpu_mode

2015-03-04 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
Daniel, thanks for your clarification. Another related question is, what will be the guest's real cpu model is the cpu_model is None? This is about a reported regression at https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1082414 . When the instance.vcpu_model.mode is None, we should compare the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]Request to to revisit this patch

2015-03-04 Thread Walter A. Boring IV
Since the Nova side isn't in, and won't land for Kilo, then there is no reason for Cinder to have it for Kilo, as it will simply not work. We can revisit this for the L release if you like. Also, make sure you have 3rd Party CI setup for this driver, or it won't be accepted in the L release

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Issue when upgrading from Juno to Kilo due to agent report_state RPC namespace patch

2015-03-04 Thread Salvatore Orlando
To put in another way I think we might say that change 154670 broke backward compatibility on the RPC interface. To be fair this probably happened because RPC interfaces were organised in a way such that this kind of breakage was unavoidable. I think the strategy proposed by Assaf is a viable

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstackclient] doodle for meeting time selection

2015-03-04 Thread Lin Hua Cheng
+1 Thanks Doug for setting up the Doodle. On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Ian Cordasco ian.corda...@rackspace.com wrote: +1 On 3/4/15, 08:01, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 3, 2015, at 06:17 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Doug Hellmann

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-04 Thread Bhandaru, Malini K
Flavio, I concur, for a lively committee need active core reviewers. Core status is an honor and responsibility. I agree it’s a good idea to replace inactive cores, no offense, priorities and focus of developers change, and should they want to return, can be fast pathed then. Regards Malini

[openstack-dev] [all] oslo.config 1.9.0 release

2015-03-04 Thread Doug Hellmann
We are pumped to announce the release of: oslo.config 1.9.0: Oslo Configuration API For more details, please see the git log history below and: http://launchpad.net/oslo.config/+milestone/1.9.0 Please report issues through launchpad: http://bugs.launchpad.net/oslo.config Changes in

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] checking on odds that spec will be approved for K

2015-03-04 Thread Chris K
Hello Ceilometer, I would like to check on the chances that spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130359 will land in the K cycle. We in Ironic have specs that are dependent on the above spec and are checking to see if we need to bump them to L? Any information regarding this would be helpful.

[openstack-dev] [API] #openstack-api created

2015-03-04 Thread Ian Cordasco
At (or maybe after) the last API-WG meeting, the idea to create an API-WG specific channel came up again and there was consensus that it would be beneficial to have. I registered the channel and have submitted the appropriate changes to system-config and project-config to enable logging of the

[openstack-dev] [Trove] request to backport the fix for bug 1333852 to juno

2015-03-04 Thread Amrith Kumar
There has been a request to backport the fix for bug 1333852 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1333852) which was fixed in Kilo into the Juno release. The change includes a database change and a small change to the Trove API. The change also requires a change to the trove client and the

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer

2015-03-04 Thread Kyle Mestery
I'd like to propose that we add Ihar Hrachyshka to the Neutron core reviewer team. Ihar has been doing a great job reviewing in Neutron as evidence by his stats [1]. Ihar is the Oslo liaison for Neutron, he's been doing a great job keeping Neutron current there. He's already a critical reviewer

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Output on stderr

2015-03-04 Thread Lin Hua Cheng
Here's the link to the code review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147399/ On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, March 4, 2015, David Stanek dsta...@dstanek.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer

2015-03-04 Thread Carl Baldwin
+1 On Mar 4, 2015 12:44 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: I'd like to propose that we add Ihar Hrachyshka to the Neutron core reviewer team. Ihar has been doing a great job reviewing in Neutron as evidence by his stats [1]. Ihar is the Oslo liaison for Neutron, he's been doing a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer

2015-03-04 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Ihar has proved in several circumstances that he knows neutron source trees way better than me, his reviews are more frequent, thorough, and useful than those of the average core team member. Summarising, in my opinion it is a nonsense that I am part of this team and he's not. So I am obviously

[openstack-dev] [cinder] [Third-party-announce] Cinder Merged patch broke HDS driver

2015-03-04 Thread Marcus Vinícius Ramires do Nascimento
Hi folks, This weekend, the patch Snapshot and volume objects ( https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133566) was merged and this one broke our HDS HBSD driver and the respective CI. When CI tries to run tempest.api.volume.admin.test_snapshots_actions the following error is shown: 2015-03-04

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer

2015-03-04 Thread Kevin Benton
+1 On Mar 4, 2015 12:25 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote: +1 from me, Ihar has been doing great work and it will be great to have him finally able to merge! On Mar 4, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: I'd like to propose that we add Ihar Hrachyshka to the

Re: [openstack-dev] Testing NUMA, CPU pinning and large pages

2015-03-04 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - From: Adrian Hoban adrian.ho...@intel.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org -Original Message- From: Steve Gordon [mailto:sgor...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 8:49 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] blueprint about multiple workers supported in nova-scheduler

2015-03-04 Thread Mike Bayer
Attila Fazekas afaze...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I wonder what is the planned future of the scheduling. The scheduler does a lot of high field number query, which is CPU expensive when you are using sqlalchemy-orm. Does anyone tried to switch those operations to sqlalchemy-core ? An

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer

2015-03-04 Thread Armando M.
+1! On 4 March 2015 at 22:29, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Mar 4, 2015 12:25 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote: +1 from me, Ihar has been doing great work and it will be great to have him finally able to merge! On Mar 4, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Kyle Mestery

[openstack-dev] [oslo] reminder of feature freeze on 12 Mar

2015-03-04 Thread Doug Hellmann
We’re about 1 week out from the Oslo feature freeze, which is 1 week earlier than the app freeze at the third milestone. If you have features you were expecting to land for this cycle, please make sure the core review teams are aware so we can prioritize those reviews. Doug

[openstack-dev] [os-ansible-deployment] Addition of channel logging

2015-03-04 Thread Ian Cordasco
Hey everyone, I just wanted to make the list aware that the stackforge/os-ansible-deployment project has submitted a change to start logging its channel (#openstack-ansible). Please vote on the proposal https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161412/ Cheers, Ian

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer

2015-03-04 Thread Henry Gessau
+1 !!! On Wed, Mar 04, 2015, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: I'd like to propose that we add Ihar Hrachyshka to the Neutron core reviewer team. Ihar has been doing a great job reviewing in Neutron as evidence by his stats [1]. Ihar is the Oslo liaison for Neutron, he's been doing a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer

2015-03-04 Thread Doug Wiegley
+1 On Mar 4, 2015, at 12:42 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: I'd like to propose that we add Ihar Hrachyshka to the Neutron core reviewer team. Ihar has been doing a great job reviewing in Neutron as evidence by his stats [1]. Ihar is the Oslo liaison for Neutron, he's been

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] blueprint about multiple workers supported in nova-scheduler

2015-03-04 Thread Jay Pipes
On 03/04/2015 01:51 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote: Hi, I wonder what is the planned future of the scheduling. The scheduler does a lot of high field number query, which is CPU expensive when you are using sqlalchemy-orm. Does anyone tried to switch those operations to sqlalchemy-core ? Actually,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer

2015-03-04 Thread Maru Newby
+1 from me, Ihar has been doing great work and it will be great to have him finally able to merge! On Mar 4, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: I'd like to propose that we add Ihar Hrachyshka to the Neutron core reviewer team. Ihar has been doing a great job

[openstack-dev] [OpenStackClient] Weekly meeting time change

2015-03-04 Thread Dean Troyer
Per the results from the Doodle set up by dhellmann [0] we are moving the scheduled OpenStackClient team meeting back to 1900 UTC starting tomorrow, 05 Mar 2014, still in freenode #openstack-meeting. The agenda for the meeting can be found at

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][messaging][zmq] Discussion on zmq driver design issues

2015-03-04 Thread Doug Hellmann
Thanks for pulling this list together, Oleksii. More comments inline. - Doug On Wed, Mar 4, 2015, at 12:10 PM, ozamiatin wrote: Hi, By this e-mail I'd like to start a discussion about current zmq driver internal design problems I've found out. I wish to collect here all proposals and known

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra][all] CI Check Queue stuck

2015-03-04 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 03/04/2015 09:27 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: There has been a maintenance window in one of our providers cloud and it seems that some of the OpenStack CI infrastructure is not working as is. You will notice that Jenkins is not commenting on any changes submitted to review.openstack.org, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] SQLAlchemy performance suite and upcoming features (was: [nova] blueprint about multiple workers)

2015-03-04 Thread Mike Bayer
Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote: Attila Fazekas afaze...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, I wonder what is the planned future of the scheduling. The scheduler does a lot of high field number query, which is CPU expensive when you are using sqlalchemy-orm. Does anyone tried to switch

[openstack-dev] [openstack-operators] [nova] Nova options as instance metadata

2015-03-04 Thread Belmiro Moreira
Hi, in nova there are several options that can be defined in the flavor (extra specs) and/or as image properties. This is great, however to deploy some of these options we will need offer the same image with different properties or let the users upload the same image with the right properties. It

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] blueprint about multiple workers supported in nova-scheduler

2015-03-04 Thread Rui Chen
Looks like it's a complicated problem, and nova-scheduler can't scale-out horizontally in active/active mode. Maybe we should illustrate the problem in the HA docs. http://docs.openstack.org/high-availability-guide/content/_schedulers.html Thanks for everybody's attention. 2015-03-05 5:38

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.policy] guraduation status

2015-03-04 Thread Osanai, Hisashi
Doug, Thank you for the response and sorry to respond you late. Recently I could not receive e-mails from this list and your e-mail was one of them. I don't know the reason but I found out your response in archive. On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 12:28:06 -0800, Doug Hellmann wrote: We're making good

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] what's the merge plan for current proposed microversions?

2015-03-04 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Alexandre Levine alev...@cloudscaling.com wrote: Christopher, Does this So the plan for assignment of microversion api numbers is the same as what we currently do for db migration changes - take the next one knowing that you may need to rebase if someone

Re: [openstack-dev] [API] #openstack-api created

2015-03-04 Thread michael mccune
huzzah! thanks Ian =) mike __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] what's the merge plan for current proposed microversions?

2015-03-04 Thread Alexandre Levine
Christopher, If I'm not mistaken about what you mean I understand the point with the small changes, but what's wrong with already approved, tested and ready changes to be added as one version? Alternatively you risk getting rather quickly to high version numbers like 2.25, 2.37 It'll lead

Re: [openstack-dev] removal of v3 in tree testing

2015-03-04 Thread GHANSHYAM MANN
Hi Sean, Yes having V3 directory/file names is very confusing now. But current v3 sample tests cases tests v2.1 plugins. As /v3 url is redirected to v21 plugins, v3 sample tests make call through v3 url and test v2.1 plugins. I think we can start cleaning up the *v3* from everywhere and change

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-04 Thread Steve Gordon
- Original Message - From: Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org To: James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com It's certainly a lot less than you, but we have the entire system call man pages. It's an official project of the kernel:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Behavior of default security group

2015-03-04 Thread Hirofumi Ichihara
Thank you for your response. That's a fair point. But I think it's because you're not expected to run as admin, and having a way to drop the group as admin can be of value for e.g. debugging or cleaning up after some bugs [1]. You’re right. Regenerate logic seems strange to me. But I’m not

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-04 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 11:19 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: James Bottomley wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:59 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Second it's at a very different evolution/maturity point (20 years old vs. 0-4 years old for OpenStack projects). Yes, but I thought I covered this

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS Subteam meetings

2015-03-04 Thread Sridhar Ramaswamy
Hi Paul. I'd vote for (C) and a slightly later time-slot on Tuesdays - 1630 UTC (or later). The meetings so far was indeed quite useful. I guess the current busy Kilo cycle is also contributing to the low turnout. As we pick up things going forward this forum will be quite useful to discuss

[openstack-dev] [Glance] [all] python-glanceclient release 0.16.1

2015-03-04 Thread Nikhil Komawar
The python-glanceclient release management team is pleased to announce: python-glanceclient version 0.16.1 has been released on Thursday, Mar 5th around 04:56 UTC. For more information, please find the details at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Question about boot-from-volume instance and flavor

2015-03-04 Thread Alex Xu
2015-03-04 4:45 GMT+08:00 Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com: On 03/03/2015 01:10 AM, Rui Chen wrote: Hi all, When we boot instance from volume, we find some ambiguous description about flavor root_gb in operations guide, http://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ops/content/flavors.html /Virtual

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] blueprint about multiple workers supported in nova-scheduler

2015-03-04 Thread Rui Chen
We will face the same issue in multiple nova-scheduler process case, like Sylvain say, right? Two processes/workers can actually consume two distinct resources on the same HostState. 2015-03-05 13:26 GMT+08:00 Alex Xu sou...@gmail.com: Rui, you still can run multiple nova-scheduler process

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] blueprint about multiple workers supported in nova-scheduler

2015-03-04 Thread Alex Xu
Rui, you still can run multiple nova-scheduler process now. 2015-03-05 10:55 GMT+08:00 Rui Chen chenrui.m...@gmail.com: Looks like it's a complicated problem, and nova-scheduler can't scale-out horizontally in active/active mode. Maybe we should illustrate the problem in the HA docs.

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Break_on in Retry policy

2015-03-04 Thread Nikolay Makhotkin
Ok, we will proceed with error-on and success-on. Thanks for the reply! -- Best Regards, Nikolay __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Break_on in Retry policy

2015-03-04 Thread Thomas Hsiao
Hi, I like the idea of explicit checks by success-on and error-on: success-on to break retry and get SUCCESS state. error-on to break retry but get ERROR state. A single break-on seems confusing to me too. Regards, Thomas Hsiao HP Cloud Nikolay, thanks for sharing this… I think that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Question about boot-from-volume instance and flavor

2015-03-04 Thread Lingxian Kong
The option1 is a bad idea, IMO. Think about so many extra_specs in the flavor today, you really don't want create another dozen of flavor with root_gb=0 just for booting from volume. For the billing concern, it really should be taken into account, but it's not the business of OpenStack, IMHO. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer

2015-03-04 Thread Gary Kotton
+100Š.000 Very long overdue! On 3/4/15, 10:23 PM, Maru Newby ma...@redhat.com wrote: +1 from me, Ihar has been doing great work and it will be great to have him finally able to merge! On Mar 4, 2015, at 11:42 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: I'd like to propose that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer

2015-03-04 Thread Vikram Choudhary
+1 From: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] Sent: 05 March 2015 03:12 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Proposal to add Ihar Hrachyshka as a Neutron Core Reviewer +1! On 4 March 2015 at 22:29, Kevin Benton

Re: [openstack-dev] Need help in configuring keystone

2015-03-04 Thread Steve Martinelli
What do the keystone logs indicate? Steve Akshik DBK aks...@outlook.com wrote on 03/04/2015 02:18:47 AM: From: Akshik DBK aks...@outlook.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List not for usage questions openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 03/04/2015 02:25 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Decision related to cinder metadata

2015-03-04 Thread Duncan Thomas
So, one problem here is that 'metadata' in cinder has (at least) 3 meanings. Here is an attempt to clarify (which should be on some wiki page somewhere, I'll add it once people tell me the meaning is clear). Volume metadata: - This is set via the --metadata flag at create time, and there are

[openstack-dev] [cinder]Request to to revisit this patch

2015-03-04 Thread Zhangni
Hi Mike, Jay, and Walter, Please revisit this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151959/ and don't revert this, thank you very much! I think it's apposite to merge the SDSHypervisor driver in cinder first, and next to request nova to add a new libvirt volume driver. Meanwhile nova side

[openstack-dev] [infra][all] CI Check Queue stuck

2015-03-04 Thread Andreas Jaeger
There has been a maintenance window in one of our providers cloud and it seems that some of the OpenStack CI infrastructure is not working as is. You will notice that Jenkins is not commenting on any changes submitted to review.openstack.org, the check queue is currently stuck. Please have

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Break_on in Retry policy

2015-03-04 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Nikolay, thanks for sharing this… I think that we really have a semantical ambiguity here. If we leave just “break-on” that both types of behavior have a right to exist. I’m personally for defining that more explicitly with two separate instructions “success-on” and “error-on”. A use case for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecation warnings in python-fuelclient-6.1.*

2015-03-04 Thread Kamil Sambor
Hi all, IMHO deprecation warning should be added only to commands that we recently changed (because users can switch to new interface when they see deprecation error) or eventually solution #2 sounds ok but is not ideal because people can forget about warning that they saw in previous release.

Re: [openstack-dev] Need help in configuring keystone

2015-03-04 Thread Akshik DBK
Hi Steve, here are the log details == /var/log/shibboleth/shibd.log ==2015-03-04 14:36:05 INFO Shibboleth.AttributeExtractor.XML [2]: skipping unmapped SAML 2.0 Attribute with Name: urn:oid:0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.12015-03-04 14:36:05 INFO Shibboleth.AttributeExtractor.XML [2]: skipping

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Re-evaluating the suitability of the 6 month release cycle

2015-03-04 Thread Thierry Carrez
James Bottomley wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 11:59 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: James Bottomley wrote: Actually, this is possible: look at Linux, it freezes for 10 weeks of a 12 month release cycle (or 6 weeks of an 8 week one). More on this below. I'd be careful with comparisons with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] what's the merge plan for current proposed microversions?

2015-03-04 Thread Christopher Yeoh
On Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:28:34 -0500 Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 03/03/2015 10:24 AM, Claudiu Belu wrote: Hello. I've talked with Christopher Yeoh yesterday and I've asked him about the microversions and when will they be able to merge. He said that for now, this commit had to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecation warnings in python-fuelclient-6.1.*

2015-03-04 Thread Przemyslaw Kaminski
Maybe add a Changelog in the repo and maintain it? http://keepachangelog.com/ Option #2 is OK but it can cause pain when testing -- upon each fresh installation from ISO we would get that message and it might break some tests though that is fixable. Option #3 is OK too. #1 is worst and I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Policy][Group-based-policy] Bug squashing day

2015-03-04 Thread Sumit Naiksatam
Thanks to the entire team for participating today, we made very good progress with knocking off a number of long standing bugs. We will also be cutting a new stable/juno release towards the end of this week since we ended up back porting quite a few fixes. On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Sumit

[openstack-dev] FW: [Policy][Group-based-policy] SFC USe Case

2015-03-04 Thread Venkatrangan G - ERS, HCL Tech
Hi, I am trying out the procedure listed in this page https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GroupBasedPolicy/InstallODLIntegrationDevstack. I was looking for an use case with Service Function chaining i.e. to use redirect with gbp command. Can you please point me to some link that can help me out

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] blueprint about multiple workers supported in nova-scheduler

2015-03-04 Thread Attila Fazekas
Hi, I wonder what is the planned future of the scheduling. The scheduler does a lot of high field number query, which is CPU expensive when you are using sqlalchemy-orm. Does anyone tried to switch those operations to sqlalchemy-core ? The scheduler does lot of thing in the application, like

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] blueprint about multiple workers supported in nova-scheduler

2015-03-04 Thread Sylvain Bauza
Le 04/03/2015 04:51, Rui Chen a écrit : Hi all, I want to make it easy to launch a bunch of scheduler processes on a host, multiple scheduler workers will make use of multiple processors of host and enhance the performance of nova-scheduler. I had registered a blueprint and commit a patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecation warnings in python-fuelclient-6.1.*

2015-03-04 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
I’d like to resolve some questions: @Przemysław: - We can avoid that message by supplying --quiet. - Changelog is currently managed automatically by PBR so as soon as there is a release there will be a change log - I think #2 can be done along with #3 @Kamil: - The issue is that it’s not

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Deprecation warnings in python-fuelclient-6.1.*

2015-03-04 Thread Kamil Sambor
@romcheg - the idea is to switch partially to new client so keeping one package with two entry points: fuel and fuel_v2. It will be convenient for us to add new commands to fuel_v2 only and switch slowly old commands to new version and add warnings in old client commands. It will give users time

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Specific Juno version

2015-03-04 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/2015 04:42 PM, Eduard Matei wrote: Hi, Is there a way to specify the Juno version to be installed using devstack. For now we can only specify stable/juno *git clone -b stable/juno https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack.git

Re: [openstack-dev] auto-abandon changesets considered harmful (was Re: [stable][all] Revisiting the 6 month release cycle [metrics])

2015-03-04 Thread Alexis Lee
John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com writes: ​Should we just rename this thread to Sensitivity training for contributors? Culture plays a role in shaping ones expectations here. I was lucky enough to grow up in open source culture, so I can identify an automated response easily and I don't

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.

2015-03-04 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 03/03/15 16:10 +, Nikhil Komawar wrote: If it was not clear in my previous message, I would like to again emphasize that I truly appreciate the vigor and intent behind Flavio's proposal. We need to be proactive and keep making the community better in such regards. However, at the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Output on stderr

2015-03-04 Thread David Stanek
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS abhishek.tal...@tcs.com wrote: While working on a bug for keystoneclient I have replaced sys.exit with return. However, the code reviewers want that the output should be on stderr(as sys.exit does). So how can we get the output on

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] what's the merge plan for current proposed microversions?

2015-03-04 Thread Alexandre Levine
Christopher, Does this So the plan for assignment of microversion api numbers is the same as what we currently do for db migration changes - take the next one knowing that you may need to rebase if someone else merges before you mean that I should put 2.2 in my review for now instead of 2.4?

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Output on stderr

2015-03-04 Thread Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS
Hi All, While working on a bug for keystoneclient I have replaced sys.exit with return. However, the code reviewers want that the output should be on stderr(as sys.exit does). So how can we get the output on stderr. def do_user_password_update(kc, args): Update user password. user =

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-04 Thread Danny Al-Gaaf
Am 04.03.2015 um 15:18 schrieb Csaba Henk: Hi Danny, - Original Message - From: Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de To: Deepak Shetty dpkshe...@gmail.com Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Manila] Ceph native driver for manila

2015-03-04 Thread Danny Al-Gaaf
Am 04.03.2015 um 15:12 schrieb Csaba Henk: Hi Danny, - Original Message - From: Danny Al-Gaaf danny.al-g...@bisect.de To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, ceph-de...@vger.kernel.org Sent: Sunday, March 1, 2015 3:07:36

[openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] The None and 'none' for CONF.libvirt.cpu_mode

2015-03-04 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
Hi, Daniel I'm a bit confused of the None/'none' for CONF.libvirt.cpu_mode. Per my understanding, None means there is no configuration provided and libvirt will select the default value based on the virt_type, none means no cpu_mode information should be provided. For the guest, am I

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Specific Juno version

2015-03-04 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi, Indeed CINDER_BRANCH=2014.2.2 did the trick. Will properly report the issues once we start testing on 2014.2.3. Eduard __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] Gerrit tooling improvements

2015-03-04 Thread Alexis Lee
Salvatore Orlando said on Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:21:08PM +0100: Is common sense an option here? Common sense is never an option :) Mainly because it's situational and hence arises out of shared culture and expectations, so those not indoctrinated into the group yet get scolded for lacking

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Specific Juno version

2015-03-04 Thread Eduard Matei
Hi Ihar, This is the error i see in c-vol screen: 2015-03-03 18:39:34.060 DEBUG taskflow.engines.action_engine.runner [req-87db2771-5c25-4c9b-a3bc-f7a504468315 4af0a30fe2c14deb9f9cf341a97daa9f 1fbab1e235ff414abf249c741fb3c6c9] Exiting old state 'WAITING' in response to event 'analyze' from

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ec2-api] Functional tests for EC2-API in nova

2015-03-04 Thread M Ranga Swami Reddy
Agree with dims. On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 6:14 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote: Alex, It's better do a experimental one first before trying to a non-voting: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/tree/zuul/layout.yaml#n1509 -- dims On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at

  1   2   >