On 03/31/2015 06:24 PM, John Griffith wrote:
What is missing for me here however is who picks these special people. I'm
convinced that this does more to promote the idea of special contributors than
anything else. Maybe that's actually what you want, but it seemed based on your
message that
The next meeting is Tuesday 1400UTC, that is Apr 7.
Neutron meeting time is rotated between Monday 2100UTC and Tuesday 1400UTC.
Akihiro
2015-04-01 14:12 GMT+09:00 Vikram Choudhary vikram.choudh...@huawei.com:
Hi Kyle,
The link [2]
Its UTC, check with your local time.
From: Vikram Choudhary [mailto:vikram.choudh...@huawei.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 10:42 AM
To: mest...@mestery.com
Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Design Summit Session etherpad
Hi Kyle,
The link [2]
Hi,
I tested Swift backup driver in Cinder-backup and that performance isn't
high.
In our test environment, The average time for backup 50G volume is 20min.
I found a patch for this that add multi thread for swift backup driver(
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111314) but It's also too slow.
Hi Devs,
I have couple of questions regarding cells V2.
Once cells V2 is implemented then there will be no concept on non-cell
deployment which means there will be one cell at least (by default).
1. How the deployment with multiple availability zones done with cells V2?
2. How the availability
Le 26/03/2015 17:17, Andrew Laski a écrit :
Daylight saving time has made it so that the 2200UTC meeting time is
fairly inconvenient for a few of us and the 2100UTC timeslot is open
so we're going to shift the meeting up by an hour. I have already
spoken with many of the people in regular
John Griffith wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0].
Instead of writing the same thing twice, you can look at the
rendered html from that patch [1].
Le 01/04/2015 08:37, Kekane, Abhishek a écrit :
Hi Devs,
I have couple of questions regarding cells V2.
Once cells V2 is implemented then there will be no concept on non-cell
deployment which means there will be one cell at least (by default).
1. How the deployment with multiple
Hi Rob
There is no API request failure under current hardware configuration. If you
remove one physical server for NOVA API service or for scheduler service, then
API request failure will happen under 1000 concurrency. Similar to Neutron.
Before expansion to the current test environment
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Ian Wienand iwien...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/27/2015 08:47 PM, Alan Pevec wrote:
But how come that same recent pyOpenSSL doesn't consume more memory on
Ubuntu?
Just to loop back on the final status of this ...
pyOpenSSL 0.14 does seem to use about an order
This is something we're working on (I work with the author of the patch you
referenced) but the refactoring of the backup code in this cycle has made
progress challenging. If you have a patch that works, please submit it,
even if it needs some cleaning up, we'd be happy to work with you on and
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Anita Kuno wrote:
I am really having a problem with a lack of common vision. Now this may
just be my problem here, and if it is, that is fine, I'll own that.
It's not just you.
But other folks, as Dean mentions above, do indicate in their language
that they feel
Hello all,
A month ago, I registered a blueprint named horizon-policy-abstractions in
Congress, the link is:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/congress/+spec/horizon-policy-abstraction. In
this BP, I abstract the policy in congress into name, object, violation
condition, action and data. And
Joe Gordon wrote:
I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0]. Instead
of writing the same thing twice, you can look at the rendered html from
that patch [1]. Neutron tried to go from core to maintainer but after
input from the TC and others, they are keeping the term 'core'
Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
mailto:dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you feel like a core deveper/reviewer (we initially
Context:
During the Kilo development cycle the KVM/libvirt on system z platform
made some effort to be supported by the libvirt driver [1].
Observation:
Our first tests in a prototype platform CI showed some false negatives
because some unit tests don't seem to be fully
On 03/31/2015 03:30 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Hey folks,
One of our community members submitted a review to add optional Ansible
support to deploy OpenStack using Ansible and the containers within Kolla.
Our main objective remains: for third party deployment tools to use Kolla as a
On 03/31/2015 10:13 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
Ever since daylight savings time it has been increasing difficult for many API
WG members to make it to the Thursday 00:00 UTC meeting time.
Do we change it so there’s only the Thursday 16:00 UTC meeting time?
On a related note, I can’t make it to
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Ryan Brown wrote:
On 03/31/2015 10:13 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
Ever since daylight savings time it has been increasing difficult for
many API WG members to make it to the Thursday 00:00 UTC meeting
time.
Do we change it so there’s only the Thursday 16:00 UTC meeting time?
It might be possible with iptables or ebtables rules, but it's not planned
that I'm aware of and it would be non-trivial to do. The current
implementation depends heavily on OVS flow rules.[1]
1. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/DVR_L2_Agent
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Dr. Jens
+ developers mailing list, hopefully a developer might be able to chime in.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Marc Heckmann marc.heckm...@ubisoft.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I was going to post a similar question this evening, so I decided to just
bounce on Mathieu’s question. See below inline.
On
On Wed, Apr 01 2015, Joshua Harlow wrote:
+1 to this. There will always be people who will want to work on fun stuff and
those who don't; it's the job of leadership in the community to direct people
if they can (but also the same job of that leadership to understand that they
can't direct
Hi Rob
There is no API request failure under current hardware configuration. If you
remove one physical server for NOVA API service or for scheduler service, then
API request failure will happen under 1000 concurrency. Similar to Neutron.
Before expansion to the current test environment
On 04/01/2015 05:41 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0]. Instead
of writing the same thing twice, you can look at the rendered html from
that patch [1]. Neutron tried to go from core to maintainer but after
input from the
Thanks for the clarification Akihiro
-Original Message-
From: Akihiro Motoki [mailto:amot...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 April 2015 13:41
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Design Summit Session etherpad
The next meeting
On 03/31/2015 10:13 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
Ever since daylight savings time it has been increasing difficult for
many API WG members to make it to the Thursday 00:00 UTC meeting
time.
Do we change it so there’s only the Thursday 16:00 UTC meeting time?
On a related note, I can’t make it
Hi All,
I am looking if we
can change the resources of a running VM instance (i.e. cpu, ram,
changing the flavor). On running instances you can just edit security
group, attach volumes or associate floating IP's. So what can we do
if we want to change the flavor of a running vm or resize it.
Today I encountered an issue which is caused by the lack of automatic version
checks.
One of the users of Fuel Client asked me why it doesn’t work on their
environment. I realized, that the issue was caused by wrong version
specification in the Fuel Client requirements list.
I analyzed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/31/2015 09:19 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote:
Hi all,
After moving to oslo.log and a lots of reviews to Cinder we merged
some parts for hacking checks to our code [1], [2]. Some of them
are also implemented in Nova [2], [3]. I didn't check
http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-compute-v2.html#compute_server-actions
Fawad Khaliq
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Abhishek Talwar/HYD/TCS
abhishek.tal...@tcs.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am looking if we can change the resources of a running VM instance (i.e.
cpu, ram, changing the
On 04/01/2015 08:35 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 03/31/2015 10:13 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
Ever since daylight savings time it has been increasing difficult for
many API WG members to make it to the Thursday 00:00 UTC meeting time.
Do we change it so there’s only the Thursday 16:00 UTC meeting
Hello,
I've been investigating bug [1] concentrating on the
fuel-plugin-external-glusterfs.
First of all: [2] there are no core reviewers for Gerrit for this repo
so even if there was a patch to fix [1] no one could merge it. I saw
also fuel-plugin-external-nfs -- same issue, haven't checked
On 2015-04-01 11:41:29 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote:
[...]
We used[1] to have 4 groups for each project, mostly driven by the
need to put people in ACL groups. The PTL (which has ultimate
control), the Drivers (the trusted group around the PTL which had
control over blueprint targeting
I just spent a chunk of the morning purging out some really old
Incomplete bugs because about 9 months ago we disabled the auto
expiration bit in launchpad -
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+configure-bugtracker
This is a manually grueling task, which by looking at these bugs, no one
else is
Hello
I have noticed that some openstack projects [1] use pylint gate job.
From my point of view it could simplify code reviews even as non-voing
job and generally it could improve code quality. Some code issues like
code duplication are not easy to discover during code review so
automatic
On Wed, Apr 01 2015, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
Responsibilities not tied to specific controls in our tools do exist
in abundance, but they tend to be more fluid and ad-hoc because in
most cases there's been no need to wrap authorization/enforcement
around them. What I worry is happening is that
Hi,
I think it is better to have Open source enabled Virtual Router, in
OpenStack supported by Cloud Router.
With open virtual router available, many of the L3 functionality/routing
functionality can be easily integrated in cloud for overlay network.
Regards,
keshava
-Original
Le 01/04/2015 15:51, Sean Dague a écrit :
I just spent a chunk of the morning purging out some really old
Incomplete bugs because about 9 months ago we disabled the auto
expiration bit in launchpad -
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+configure-bugtracker
This is a manually grueling task, which
On 4/1/15, 5:12 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 03/31/2015 03:30 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Hey folks,
One of our community members submitted a review to add optional Ansible
support to deploy OpenStack using Ansible and the containers within
Kolla. Our main objective
On 4/1/15, 5:32 AM, Chmouel Boudjnah chmo...@chmouel.com wrote:
On 03/31/2015 03:30 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
Hey folks,
One of our community members submitted a review to add optional Ansible
support to deploy OpenStack using Ansible and the containers within
Kolla.
Our main
Hi Filip,
I think adding pylint job to Murano gates is an awesome idea, have you
checked out how to do this?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Filip Blaha filip.bl...@hp.com wrote:
Hello
I have noticed that some openstack projects [1] use pylint gate job. From
my point of view it could
Hello Fellow Ironicers!
We have a Bug Squash scheduled for Thursday, 02April 2015 starting at 0800hrs
PST. We have quite a few bugs listed for RC1 that need to be tackled, so the
more folks who are able to join, the merrier!
Here is the link to the pad:
On 4/1/15, 08:24, michael mccune m...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/01/2015 08:35 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 03/31/2015 10:13 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
Ever since daylight savings time it has been increasing difficult for
many API WG members to make it to the Thursday 00:00 UTC meeting time.
Do we
On 03/31/2015 08:49 AM, Julia Varlamova wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to request a Feature Freeze Exception forAuthomatic cleanup
of share_servers
(Launchpad:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/manila/+spec/automatic-cleanup-of-share-servers).
Patch can be found here:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Lenny Verkhovsky len...@mellanox.com
wrote:
Hi all,
We had some issues with presentation of the logs, now it looks ok.
You can see Nova CI logs here
http://144.76.193.39/ci-artifacts/Check-MLNX-Nova-ML2-Sriov-driver_20150401_1102/
Tempest output is
On 1 April 2015 at 10:04, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
+1 to this. There will always be people who will want to work on fun stuff
and those who don't; it's the job of leadership in the community to direct
people if they can (but also the same job of that leadership to understand
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote:
+ developers mailing list, hopefully a developer might be able to chime in.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Marc Heckmann marc.heckm...@ubisoft.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I was going to post a similar question this
Hi all,
We had some issues with presentation of the logs, now it looks ok.
You can see Nova CI logs here
http://144.76.193.39/ci-artifacts/Check-MLNX-Nova-ML2-Sriov-driver_20150401_1102/
Tempest output is
On Apr 1, 2015, at 3:52 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
mailto:dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com
mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com
Great. I'm just doing some experiments to evaluate REQ/REP pattern.
It seems that your implementation is completed.
Looking forward to reviewing your updates.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:02 PM, ozamiatin ozamia...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for not replying on [1] comments too long.
I'm
Hi all,
Do we have plan to implement it in Liberity? I am really interest in and want
to join it.
/Yalei
From: Miguel Ángel Ajo [mailto:majop...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2015 12:31 AM
To: Ben Pfaff
Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re:
On 04/01/2015 12:31 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
On 1 April 2015 at 10:04, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
mailto:harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
+1 to this. There will always be people who will want to work on fun
stuff and those who don't; it's the job of leadership in the
community to
On Mar 31, 2015, at 12:34 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
Very cool. What's the latest status on data-plane support for the conntrack
based things like firewall rules and conntrack integration?
As Miguel mentioned, we have working code:
I think there's a lot of `a rose by any other name would smell as sweet' going
on here, we're really just arguing about how we label things. I admit I use
the term gantt as a very expansive, this is the effort to clean up the current
scheduler and create a separate scheduler as a service
On 04/02/2015 09:02 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
but since parties who don't understand our mostly non-hierarchical
community can see those sets of access controls, they cling to them
as a sign of importance and hierarchy of the people listed within.
There is no hierarchy for submitting code --
Actually, for some projects the +1 is part of a public voting process and
therefore required.
Michael
On 2 Apr 2015 8:11 am, Steve Martinelli steve...@ca.ibm.com wrote:
*puts mailing list police hat on*
Refer to
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059642.html
I
Super good news!!!
- Kun Huang (Gareth)
-Original Message-
From: gordon chung [mailto:g...@live.ca]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 8:47 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List not for usage questions
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] proposal to add ZhiQiang Fan to
Hey all,
I've run into a requirement where it'd be useful if, as an end user, I could
inject
a personal ssh key onto all provisioned overcloud nodes.
Obviously this is something that not every user would need or want. I talked
about
some options with Dan Prince on IRC, and (besides suggesting
for those who i have/haven't already discuss this nomination with already,
please vote here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169959/
for those who can't comment in gerrit, just holler something in
#openstack-ceilometer.
cheers,
gord
Date: Thu, 2 Apr
On 04/01/2015 03:23 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
The problem I see now, is that random people who has very little
knowledge of $PROJECT or OpenStack as its whole jump in random review
and put a -1 in Gerrit. And then never remove it. And then your patch is
stuck for ever in review. Probably because
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/01/2015 06:31 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
Right now there are some strong indications that there are areas we
are very weak at (nova network still being preferred to neutron
I don't think it's correct. As per latest summit survey [1],
hi,
i'd like to nominate ZhiQiang Fan to the Ceilometer core team. he has been a
leading reviewer in Ceilometer and consistently gives insightful reviews. he
also contributes patches and helps triage bugs.
reviews:
Julien Danjou wrote:
On Wed, Apr 01 2015, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
Responsibilities not tied to specific controls in our tools do exist
in abundance, but they tend to be more fluid and ad-hoc because in
most cases there's been no need to wrap authorization/enforcement
around them. What I worry is
On Wed, Apr 01 2015, gordon chung wrote:
i'd like to nominate ZhiQiang Fan to the Ceilometer core team. he has been a
leading reviewer in Ceilometer and consistently gives insightful reviews. he
also contributes patches and helps triage bugs.
+1
--
Julien Danjou
-- Free Software hacker
--
On 04/01/2015 03:40 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Le 26/03/2015 17:17, Andrew Laski a écrit :
Daylight saving time has made it so that the 2200UTC meeting time is
fairly inconvenient for a few of us and the 2100UTC timeslot is open
so we're going to shift the meeting up by an hour. I have
Duncan Thomas wrote:
On 1 April 2015 at 10:04, Joshua Harlow harlo...@outlook.com
mailto:harlo...@outlook.com wrote:
+1 to this. There will always be people who will want to work on fun
stuff and those who don't; it's the job of leadership in the
community to direct people if
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Joe Gordon wrote:
I am starting this thread based on Thierry's feedback on [0]. Instead
of writing the same thing twice, you can look at the rendered html from
that patch [1]. Neutron tried to go from core to
Any ideas/ thoughts please?
In VMware world is basically the same feature provided by the resource pool.
Thanks,
Dani
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to understand what options i have for the below use case...
Having
On Apr 1, 2015, at 6:09 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
And here is the crux of the situation, which I think bears
highlighting. These empowered groups are (or at least started out
as) nothing more than an attempt to map responsibilities onto the
ACLs available to our projects
On 1 April 2015 at 12:52, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Yes, these are not orthogonal ideas. The question should be rephrased to
'which description do you identify the most with: core
developer/reviewer or maintainer?'
- Some people are core reviewers and maintainers (or
Thanks for the heads up. Has it been a common policy already?
On 02/04/15 10:09, Steve Martinelli wrote:
*puts mailing list police hat on*
Refer to
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059642.html
I know we're trying to show support for our peers, and +1'ing let's
On Apr 1, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-04-01 12:00:53 -0700 (-0700), Maru Newby wrote:
Given how important trust and relationships are to the functioning
of individual projects, I think we’re past the point where we
should allow our tooling to be the
We are pleased to announce the release of:
python-heatclient 0.4.0: OpenStack Orchestration API Client Library
For more details, please see the git log history below and:
http://launchpad.net/python-heatclient/+milestone/0.4.0
Please report issues through launchpad:
On 2015-04-01 14:35:22 -0700 (-0700), Maru Newby wrote:
I find your perspective on the term ‘core reviewer’ to be
interesting indeed, and for me it underscores the need to consider
whether using the term outside of gerrit is justified.
Agreed, that's why I said I'm worried that our community
*puts mailing list police hat on*
Refer to
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059642.html
I know we're trying to show support for our peers, and +1'ing let's them
know just that.
But it causes a lot of noise, and in the end it's up the the PTL.
Thanks,
Steve
Emilien Macchi wrote:
As we want to move under the big tent, we decided in the last Puppet
OpenStack meeting that we need a PTL for the next Cycle.
I would like to announce my candidacy.
Emilien,
Though I've only been involved with the project for a short time, it is clear
that you are an
Hi all,
I've had various discussions about $subject, which have been re-started
lately due to some excellent work going on in the Heat community (Rabi
Mishra's work integrating SoftwareDeployments with various container
launching tools [1])
tl;dr It's now possible to launch containers via heat
On Apr 1, 2015, at 2:52 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
- Some people are core reviewers and maintainers (or drivers, to reuse
the openstack terminology we already have for that)
- Some people are core reviewers only (because they can't commit 90% of
their work time to work
Hi,
Over the last few weeks Ian Main and I have been working on getting some
integration between Kolla and tripleo.
For a simple proof of concept, we launched devstack to serve as an undercloud
and used heat to spawn an overcloud
on a rhel-atomic image. In the overcloud, we deployed openstack
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:28 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Le 01/04/2015 15:51, Sean Dague a écrit :
I just spent a chunk of the morning purging out some really old
Incomplete bugs because about 9 months ago
This looks good to me, but it would be interesting to see what Sean or
Matt thought.
Michael
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:25 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Lenny Verkhovsky len...@mellanox.com
wrote:
Hi all,
We had some issues with
On 04/01/2015 04:56 PM, Michael Still wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:28 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 6:59 AM, Sylvain Bauza sba...@redhat.com wrote:
Le 01/04/2015 15:51, Sean Dague a écrit :
I just spent a chunk of the morning purging out some really old
Thanks for the detailed email on this. How about we add this to the
agenda for this weeks nova meeting?
One option would be to add a fixture to some higher level test class,
but perhaps someone has a better idea than that.
Michael
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Markus Zoeller
+1 if this can be counted :)
On 02/04/15 06:18, gordon chung wrote:
hi,
i'd like to nominate ZhiQiang Fan to the Ceilometer core team. he has been a
leading reviewer in Ceilometer and consistently gives insightful reviews. he
also contributes patches and helps triage bugs.
reviews:
On 2015-04-01 12:00:53 -0700 (-0700), Maru Newby wrote:
Given how important trust and relationships are to the functioning
of individual projects, I think we’re past the point where we
should allow our tooling to be the limiting factor in how we
structure ourselves.
I'm definitely not
Note; I haven't finished debugging the glusterfs job yet. This
relates to the OOM that started happening on Centos after we moved to
using as much pip-packaging as possible. glusterfs was still failing
even before this.
On 04/01/2015 07:58 PM, Deepak Shetty wrote:
1) So why did this happen on
86 matches
Mail list logo
