Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][nova]: anti-affinity policy via heat in IceHouse?

2015-05-24 Thread Daniel Comnea
Thanks Kevin ! Would you have an example? Much appreciated, Dani On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Fox, Kevin M kevin@pnnl.gov wrote: It works with heat. You can use a scheduler hint on the instance and the server group resource to make a new one. Thanks, Kevin

Re: [openstack-dev] [rally][summit] Rally summit updates

2015-05-24 Thread Lingxian Kong
Thanks Boris for the updates! On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic bpavlo...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi stackers, For those who don't want to miss anything related to Rally on summit I make a small blogpost that covers most interesting things:

Re: [openstack-dev] Why need br-int and br-tun in openstack neutron

2015-05-24 Thread Assaf Muller
The OVS agent has been implemented under the assumption that you're working with two bridges, it's a requirement. It creates the tunneling bridge if you enable tunneling, you can't have it any other way. On 24 במאי 2015, at 03:52, Daniel Comnea comnea.d...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May

[openstack-dev] [openstackclient] [magnum] Review of object and actions for magnumclient implementation

2015-05-24 Thread Ronald Bradford
I have outlined in the blueprint ( https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+spec/magnum-support) the object and actions mappings that are currently available in the magnumclient. I have separated the list of actions that are presently used and actions that are not for review and

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Nominating Kaitlin Farr for barbican-core

2015-05-24 Thread Chad Lung
+1 Chad Lung EMC Cloud Services * I would like to nominate Kaitlin Farr for barbican-core. ** Kaitlin has been contributing to the project for a long time, both by ** contributing code to Barbican, python-barbicanclient and Castellan, ** and also by providing valuable reviews. [1] ** As a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] HA CI job is green, please consider it when merging patches

2015-05-24 Thread James Slagle
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Jiří Stránský ji...@redhat.com wrote: Hi all, after an epic battle with bugs this week, we have a passing CI job for HA. Looking at the jobs which ran during last night, the success rate is decent (14 all-green runs vs. just 1 run where HA job was the sole CI

Re: [openstack-dev] Why need br-int and br-tun in openstack neutron

2015-05-24 Thread Daniel Comnea
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 May 2015 at 04:43, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote: There's no real reason as far as I'm aware, just an implementation decision. This is inaccurate. There is a reason(s), and this has been asked before:

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][nova]: anti-affinity policy via heat in IceHouse?

2015-05-24 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Yeah. I dont have an example with both in it but, server group: https://github.com/EMSL-MSC/heat-templates/blob/master/cfn/389/389_BaseCluster.yaml And template that launches an instance with it: https://github.com/EMSL-MSC/heat-templates/blob/master/cfn/389/389_Server.yaml Thanks, Kevin

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] usefulness of device parameter at volumeAttachment

2015-05-24 Thread Fox, Kevin M
Honestly, I dont know. I dont use either. Just heard it was broken in kvm, but it was there because of xen. Thanks, Kevin From: Géza Gémes Sent: Sunday, May 24, 2015 1:07:01 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] usefulness

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstackclient] [magnum] Review of object and actions for magnumclient implementation

2015-05-24 Thread Hongbin Lu
Hi Ronald, I think the “update” action is definitely appropriate to use, since it is not specific to magnum (Heat and Ironic use it as well). By looking through the existing list of actions [1], it looks the start/stop actions fits into the openstackclient resume/suspend actions. The “execute”

Re: [openstack-dev] Why need br-int and br-tun in openstack neutron

2015-05-24 Thread Assaf Muller
Comments in-line. - Original Message - On 23 May 2015 at 04:43, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote: There's no real reason as far as I'm aware, just an implementation decision. This is inaccurate. There is a reason(s), and this has been asked before:

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstackclient] [magnum] Review of object and actions for magnumclient implementation

2015-05-24 Thread Adrian Otto
Thanks for taking the initiative on this! Remarks in-line... On May 24, 2015, at 11:20 AM, Ronald Bradford m...@ronaldbradford.commailto:m...@ronaldbradford.com wrote: I have outlined in the blueprint (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+spec/magnum-support) the object

Re: [openstack-dev] Why need br-int and br-tun in openstack neutron

2015-05-24 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
There's no real reason as far as I'm aware, just an implementation decision. This is inaccurate. There is a reason(s), and this has been asked before: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack/2014-March/005950.html This link is to a thread asking why do we connect a Linux bridge

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstackclient] [magnum] Review of object and actions for magnumclient implementation

2015-05-24 Thread Steve Martinelli
Hey Ronald, Thanks for asking first, as more folks are adopting OSC plugins for their respective clients we should probably streamline this a bit, but the ML works for now. Just 2 remarks... I'd actually prefer 'replication controller' (which you prefer) instead of 'rc' (as adrian

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Redis as Messaging System

2015-05-24 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Todd Crane's message of 2015-05-23 12:09:10 -0700: Does anybody know of a way (either current projects or future plans) to use Redis PubSub as the messaging system for OpenStack? You'd need to write a driver for oslo.messaging. AFAIK nobody has done that as of yet. Also it's

[openstack-dev] [rally][summit] Rally summit updates

2015-05-24 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Hi stackers, For those who don't want to miss anything related to Rally on summit I make a small blogpost that covers most interesting things: http://boris-42.me/rally-on-openstack-summit-in-vancouver/ Best regards, Boris Pavlovic

Re: [openstack-dev] Why need br-int and br-tun in openstack neutron

2015-05-24 Thread Daniel Comnea
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Assaf Muller amul...@redhat.com wrote: There's no real reason as far as I'm aware, just an implementation decision. [DC]: in this case wouldn't this bee seen suitable as best practicies vs what every blog/ manual is suggesting? On 21 במאי 2015, at 01:48,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] usefulness of device parameter at volumeAttachment

2015-05-24 Thread Géza Gémes
libvirt/xen or xenapi? PVM or HVM? Thank you! Geza On 05/23/2015 02:21 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: I believe xen supports it. Thanks, Kevin * * *From:* Géza Gémes *Sent:* Saturday, May 23, 2015 2:00:32 AM *To:* OpenStack