Re: [openstack-dev] Hyper-V 2008 R2 support

2015-08-09 Thread Henry Nash
Hi So adding a deprecation warning but saying the “the code is there but not tested” in Liberty isn’t really doing it right. The deprecation warning should come in a release where the code is still tested and working (so there is no danger in breaking customers), but they are warned that they

[openstack-dev] [nova] Scheduler meeting, 2015.08.10

2015-08-09 Thread Ed Leafe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sorry, I'm going to have to miss this one. Got some engineers coming to re-level my house. :) I don't have anything much to discuss from my end, as I've been heads-down on the v3 cleanup stuff. - -- - -- Ed Leafe -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] Representing a networks connected by routers

2015-08-09 Thread Jay Pipes
On 07/28/2015 09:50 PM, Ryan Moats wrote: If that's the case, then I'd say let's just solve this right way and create a new construct rather... Ryan Moats Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote on 07/28/2015 06:44:53 PM: From: Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] Barbican : Test cases failing for the current Barbican Kilo code

2015-08-09 Thread Juan Antonio Osorio
It only runs the unit tests. BR On 9 Aug 2015 02:19, Asha Seshagiri asha.seshag...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks a lot Juan for your response:) One question I had was the barbican.sh script would run only the unit tests after the barbican installation right. The functional tests needs to be runned

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Puppet] Deploying OpenStack with Puppet modules on Docker with Heat

2015-08-09 Thread Steve Baker
On 06/08/15 06:29, Dan Prince wrote: Hi, There is a lot of interest in getting support for container based deployment within TripleO and many different ideas and opinions on how to go about doing that. One idea on the table is to use Heat to help orchestrate the deployment of docker

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] OS::Neutron::Port fails to set security group by name, no way to retrieve group ID from Neutron::SecurityGroup

2015-08-09 Thread jason witkowski
Steve, There is no error. Heat reports a successful build with no issues. I've attached the neutron port-show as well as the full heat engine logs for a build of the stack start to end. http://paste.openstack.org/show/412313/ - Heat Engine logs http://paste.openstack.org/show/412314/ - neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][infra] - py34 tests, devstack/base trusty and how does the neutron check pipeline choose between them (oh my)...

2015-08-09 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2015-08-09 17:40:33 -0500 (-0500), Ryan Moats wrote: AFAICT, the key difference between these two signatures is the image loaded for testing. The first used devstack-trusty [...] http://logs.openstack.org/05/144205/3/check/gate-neutron-python34/3f6f7bf/console.html.gz [...] This was due to

[openstack-dev] [neutron][infra] - py34 tests, devstack/base trusty and how does the neutron check pipeline choose between them (oh my)...

2015-08-09 Thread Ryan Moats
I've spent the back half of this week chasing setup failures in the voting py34 job that is part of the neutron check queue. Here are my two examples: [1] is the signature that I'm trying to avoid, and [2] is a signature that I'm happier with because it is more of a real failure... AFAICT, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [app-catalog][heat] Heat template contributors repo

2015-08-09 Thread Steve Baker
On 07/08/15 06:56, Fox, Kevin M wrote: Heat templates so far seems to be a place to dump examples for showing off how to use specific heat resources/features. Are there any intentions to maintain production ready heat templates in it? Last I asked the answer seemed to be no. If I

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

2015-08-09 Thread Steve Baker
On 07/08/15 00:12, Dan Prince wrote: On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 07:40 +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: See below On 21/07/15 20:29, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] OS::Neutron::Port fails to set security group by name, no way to retrieve group ID from Neutron::SecurityGroup

2015-08-09 Thread Steve Baker
On 08/08/15 01:51, jason witkowski wrote: Thanks for the replies guys. The issue is that it is not working. If you take a look at the pastes I linked from the first email I am using the get_resource function in the security group resource. I am not sure if it is not resolving to an

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Robert Collins
On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a release rather than the patch version all of the time - we've kind of painted ourselves into a corner a few times here with leaving no wiggle

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Robert Collins
On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable-tracker Since

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 7:55 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a

[openstack-dev] [nova-scheduler] Scheduler sub-group meeting - Agenda 8/10

2015-08-09 Thread Dugger, Donald D
Meeting on #openstack-meeting-alt at 1400 UTC (8:00AM MDT) 1) Liberty patches - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-nova-priorities-tracking 2) CPU feature representation - follow up from the mid-cycle 3) Opens -- Don Dugger Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D.

Re: [openstack-dev] How should we expose host capabilities to the scheduler

2015-08-09 Thread Tony Breeds
On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 04:49:59PM +0100, Alexis Lee wrote: Dugger, Donald D said on Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 05:39:49AM +: Also note that, although many capabilities can be represented by simple key/value pairs (e.g. the presence of a specific special instruction) that is not true for all

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] oslo_config and wsgi middlewares

2015-08-09 Thread Jamie Lennox
- Original Message - From: Mehdi Abaakouk sil...@sileht.net To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 1:57:54 AM Subject: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] oslo_config and wsgi middlewares Hi, I want to share with you some problems I have recently

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] oslo_config and wsgi middlewares

2015-08-09 Thread Jamie Lennox
- Original Message - From: Jamie Lennox jamielen...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 12:36:14 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][keystone] oslo_config and wsgi middlewares

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [all] To changes-since or not to changes-since

2015-08-09 Thread hao wang
Hi, stackers Since now we have merged filtering guideline[1], is that said we should implement this feature according this guideline? like this: *GET /app/items?f_updated_at=gte:some_timestamp* Do we have reached a consensus about this? 2015-06-19 17:07 GMT+08:00 Chris Dent chd...@redhat.com:

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 08:52, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Well it's a Friday afternoon so you know what that means, emails about the stable branches being all busted to pieces in the gate. Tracking in the usual place:

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Brocade CI

2015-08-09 Thread Mike Perez
People have asked me at the Cinder midcycle sprint to look at the Brocade CI to: 1) Keep the zone manager driver in Liberty. 2) Consider approving additional specs that we're submitted before the deadline. Here are the current problems with the last 100 runs [1]: 1) Not posting success or

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 7:09 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 8/9/2015 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a release rather than the patch version all of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

2015-08-09 Thread Joshua Harlow
Steve Baker wrote: On 07/08/15 00:12, Dan Prince wrote: On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 07:40 +0100, Derek Higgins wrote: See below On 21/07/15 20:29, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] Federated Login

2015-08-09 Thread Jamie Lennox
- Original Message - From: David Chadwick d.w.chadw...@kent.ac.uk To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2015 12:29:49 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] [Horizon] Federated Login Hi Jamie nice presentation, thanks for sharing it. I have forwarded

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Cinder] [Glance] glance_store and glance

2015-08-09 Thread Mike Perez
On 13:07 Aug 07, Jay Pipes wrote: Hi Nik, some comments inline, but tl;dr I am strongly against returning the glance_store library to the Glance source repository. Explanations inline... On 08/07/2015 01:21 AM, Nikhil Komawar wrote: Hi, During the mid-cycle we had another proposal that

Re: [openstack-dev] stable is hosed

2015-08-09 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/9/2015 6:57 PM, Robert Collins wrote: On 8 August 2015 at 12:45, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: What I do know is we need to be better about bumping the minor version in a release rather than the patch version all of the time - we've kind of painted ourselves into a

[openstack-dev] Detach a volume when it's under migration

2015-08-09 Thread liuxinguo
Detach a volume when it's under migration, volume status is still in-use: 1. create vol-1 2. attach vol-1 to a vm 3. migrate vol-1 4. when vol-1 is under migration, detach vol-1 5. after vol-1 is detached, command cinder list show that the Status of vol-1 is