Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] A special thank you to Davanum (Dims)

+++ Dims is awesome. And so are the other folks mentioned on this thread Happy Thanksgiving folks! Brad Topol, Ph.D. IBM Distinguished Engineer OpenStack (919) 543-0646 Internet: bto...@us.ibm.com Assistant: Kendra Witherspoon (919) 254-0680 From: Joshua Harlow

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer][aodh][vitrage] Raising custom alarms in AODH

On 23/11/2015 11:14 AM, AFEK, Ifat (Ifat) wrote: I guess I would like to do both: create a new alarm definition, then trigger it (call alarm_actions), and possibly later on set its state back to OK (call ok_action). I understood that currently all alarm triggering is internal in AODH,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Groups OVS conntrack support

Security groups already use connection tracking. It's just done via a linux bridge right now because the versions of OVS shipped with most distros have no native conntrack support. On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:55 AM, Tapio Tallgren wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for the stupid

Re: [openstack-dev] Learning to Debug the Gate

On 11/18/2015 06:03 PM, Mikhail Medvedev wrote: > We had a mini tutorial today in #openstack-infra, were Clark Boylan > explained how one can bring up an environment to debug logstash-2.0. > This is tangential to "debugging the gate", but still could be useful to > better understand logstash/es

[openstack-dev] [Monasca]

Guys, I added https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248882/ for review. This should create a stable/kilo release for all the Monasca components. Please review Thanks, Fabio __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] [puppet] [ceph] Puppet Ceph CI

I think I have a good lead on the recent failures in openstack / swift / radosgw integration component that we have since disabled. It looks like there is a oslo.config version upgrade conflict in the Juno repo we where using for CentOS. I think moving to Kilo will help sort this out, but at the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Do we need to have a mid-cycle?

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:05:54AM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > Another idea I floated last week was to do a virtual midcycle of sorts. > Treat it like a normal midcycle in that everyone tells their management > "I'm out for 3-4 days for the midcycle", but they don't travel anywhere. > We

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Should we make qpid/proton optional dependencies? (please say yes)

On 23 November 2015 at 22:33, Victor Stinner wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be possible to use the "extra dependencies" thing in setup.cfg? > Robert Collins started a similar change for Oslo DB for make DB drivers > optional: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184328/ > > Sadly,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] A special thank you to Davanum (Dims)

Yes, let's talk about dims while he isn't here. I'll second what Michael and Steve have to say. Dims has been a great guy to work with and he's been a great resource. On one occasion, I needed some openstack folks to help (in person) at very short notice. Dims (and Kamesh, also of Mirantis)

Re: [openstack-dev] Licenses

I believe that Swapnil Kulkarni took over that role. -amrith From: Armando Dominguez [mailto:armando.doming...@rackspace.com] Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 12:46 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] Licenses Hey All, Sorry for hitting the entire list, I'm just

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Stable team PTL nominations are open

On 11/23/2015 11:11 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, We discussed setting up a standalone stable maintenance team and as part of this effort we'll be organizing PTL elections over the coming weeks. We held a preliminary meeting today to converge on team scope and election mechanisms.

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][all] Move from active distrusting model to trusting model

Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2015-11-23 09:17:06 -0800: > Morgan Fainberg wrote: > > [...] > > With all that said, here is the proposal I would like to set forth: > > > > 1. Code reviews still need 2x Core Reviewers (no change) > > 2. Code can be developed by a member of the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] A special thank you to Davanum (Dims)

Michael, Thanks! -- Dims On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Michael Krotscheck wrote: > Have you ever wanted to thank someone directly, but they're not on IRC so > you can't pester them there? Well, dims isn't on IRC right now, so he has to > put up with being told he's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Groups OVS conntrack support

On 11/23/2015 02:16 PM, Kevin Benton wrote: > Security groups already use connection tracking. It's just done via a > linux bridge right now because the versions of OVS shipped with most > distros have no native conntrack support. This post discusses it in the context of OVN, but gets down to

[openstack-dev] [all][glance] Add Sabari Kumar Murugesan <smuruge...@vmware.com>

Greetings, I'd like to propose adding Sabari Kumar Murugesan to the glance-core team. Sabari has been contributing for quite a bit to the project with great reviews and he's also been providing great feedback in matters related to the design of the service, libraries and other areas of the team.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

On 11/23/15 at 04:43pm, Balázs Gibizer wrote: From: Andrew Laski [mailto:and...@lascii.com] Sent: November 23, 2015 17:03 On 11/23/15 at 08:54am, Ryan Rossiter wrote: > > >On 11/23/2015 5:33 AM, John Garbutt wrote: >>On 20 November 2015 at 09:37, Balázs Gibizer >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk]

Hi Sean, Thanks for your help before. It would be great if you look into another issue too. Am able to run stack.sh successfully and all services are up. But, libvirt version was 1.2.2 and qemu version was 2.0.0 To satisfy the minimum requirement of qemu- version >=2.1 and libvirt-version >=

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

gord chung said on Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:32:02PM -0500: > On 20/11/15 11:33 AM, Alexis Lee wrote: > >why would a producer spit out non-useful datapoints? If no-one cares > >or will ever care, it simply shouldn't be included. > > ... right now the > producer is just sending out a grab bag of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] How are Tenant VMs' traffic routed to Service VMs

Sam, Thanks, But I failed to install two compute nodes if tacker is enabled, I’m not sure if tacker depends on Netron L3, can you share local.conf for two compute nodes case with tacker enabled. From: Sam Hague [mailto:sha...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 9:19 PM To: Yang, Yi Y

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How could an L2 agent extension access agent methods ?

Thanks ihar! On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > UPD: now that we have some understanding what’s needed from l2 agent > extension mechanism to cater for interested subprojects (and now that we > see that probably the agent in focus right now is OVS

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] M-1 Bugs/Reviews squash day

On 19/11/15 10:32 -0300, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 16/11/15 16:45 -0300, Flavio Percoco wrote: Greetings, At our last meeting, we discussed the idea of having a Bug/Reviews squash day before the end of M-1. I'm sending this email out to propose that we do this work on one of the following

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Migration progress

On 23 November 2015 at 08:36, Paul Carlton wrote: > John > > At the live migration sub team meeting I undertook to look at the issue > of progress reporting. > > The use cases I'm envisaging are... > > As a user I want to know how much longer my instance will be migrating >

[openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

Hi, I'm using devstack to deploy stable/Kilo in my Xenserver. I successfully deploy devstack. But I found that every time I restart it, devstack always run ./stack.sh to clear all my data and resintall all the components. So here comes the questions. 1) Can I stop devstack from reinstalling

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova]Move encryptors to os-brick

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:44:17PM -0500, Ben Swartzlander wrote: > On 11/20/2015 01:19 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:45:15PM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote: > >>Brick does not have to take over the decisions in order to be a useful > >>repository for the code. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

Hi On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Young Yang wrote: > Hi, > I'm using devstack to deploy stable/Kilo in my Xenserver. > I successfully deploy devstack. But I found that every time I restart it, > devstack always run ./stack.sh to clear all my data and resintall all the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FKs in the DB

Matt Riedemann said on Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 12:58:55PM -0600: > On 11/20/2015 10:19 AM, Alexis Lee wrote: > >Should we drive one way or the other, or just put up with mixed-mode? > For the record, I hate the mixed mode. +1 > >What should be the policy for new relations? > I prefer consistency,

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

Hi, Devstack is intended for development, so when you reboot it is not expecting to be able to preserve any information, and will give you a fresh environment to continue development on. The XenServer devstack installation uses a separate VM, but devstack is automatically run at boot, as

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova]Move encryptors to os-brick

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 11:34:29AM -0800, Walter A. Boring IV wrote: > On 11/20/2015 10:19 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:45:15PM +0200, Duncan Thomas wrote: > >>Brick does not have to take over the decisions in order to be a useful > >>repository for the code. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][upgrade] new 'all things upgrade' subteam

UPD: note that there turned out to be complications with using #openstack-meeting-2 for the meeting, so we’ll have it in #openstack-meeting-3 this week, and I’ll follow up on getting the -2 channel an official status this week. I will join the -2 channel anyway to update folks who could

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

Ah yes - I’d forgotten about OFFLINE=True (shows how often I use it!) If you set this in your localrc file then yes, in theory it should work offline – but will still generate a new environment when you reboot the VM. Bob From: yatin kumbhare [mailto:yatinkumbh...@gmail.com] Sent: 23 November

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FKs in the DB

Julien Danjou said on Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 05:52:59PM +0100: > On Fri, Nov 20 2015, Alexis Lee wrote: > > We just had a fun discussion in IRC about whether foreign keys are evil. > > Initially I thought this was crazy but mordred made some good points. To > > paraphrase, that if you have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Groups OVS conntrack support

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Jakub Libosvar wrote: > On 11/22/2015 07:28 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > > Hi Fawad, > > > > From what i could understand from Miguel Angel Ajo, someone is working > > on this integration and it > > is suppose to be delivered as part of Mitaka. > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Bug day! Yeah!

Count with me tomorrow! :-) Martin On 20/11/15 01:02, Lin Hua Cheng wrote: > Great, I'll be around next Tuesday. > > -Lin > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Rob Cresswell (rcresswe) > wrote: > > As requested, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Groups OVS conntrack support

Hi, Sorry for the stupid question, but how will I use the connection tracking in security groups? Is there an extension to the Neutron API call "add security group rule" that allows for connection tracking, or this for FWaaS only? -Tapio On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:39 PM Fawad Khaliq

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FKs in the DB

Hi, However, data > integrity /can/ be preserved in other ways than RDBMS constraints, while > persistence layer performance caps that of the whole system Is the DB the limiting factor of openstack performance ? De we have hard evidence of this ? We need numbers before acting otherwise it will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Groups OVS conntrack support

Hi Tapio, This is an improvement in the lower implementation layer where to support security groups, previously, we needed to have both OVS and linux bridges. With an improvement in OVS, this can be avoided and we will only need OVS bridge. This does not affect the user interface to security

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Young Yang wrote: > Hi, > I'm using devstack to deploy stable/Kilo in my Xenserver. > I successfully deploy devstack. But I found that every time I restart it, > devstack always run ./stack.sh to clear all my data and resintall all the >

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

Use OFFLINE=True in localrc - by this you can run devstack without internet access. Use rejoin-stack.sh - this will create all your screens, and will not delete your data. make sure rabbitmq and mysql is runnig. Always do ./unstack.sh before reboot, this will cleanup resources. check screen

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Making stable maintenance its own OpenStack project team

Thierry Carrez wrote: > [...] > I'm mostly away this week at a conference, but now that we have a list > of names, we should set up a meeting early next week to further discuss > team goals and initial leadership. We'll be holding a preliminary meeting today (Monday) at 15:00 UTC in

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Should we make qpid/proton optional dependencies? (please say yes)

Hi, Would it be possible to use the "extra dependencies" thing in setup.cfg? Robert Collins started a similar change for Oslo DB for make DB drivers optional: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184328/ Sadly, this change was not merged yet. @Robert: any progress on this change? It would

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Fuel UI] Support of separate provisioning is blocked by backend issues

Hi, I have several comments, just to make sure, that we are on the same page here. Current API calls for provisioning/deployment are used by developers and fuel hackers, and by design there was removed all validation. So shouldn't there be some more user friendly API calls which have validation?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Groups OVS conntrack support

On 11/22/2015 07:28 PM, Gal Sagie wrote: > Hi Fawad, > > From what i could understand from Miguel Angel Ajo, someone is working > on this integration and it > is suppose to be delivered as part of Mitaka. > I don't remember the person name, Miguel will sure update shortly. > > Gal. Hi Fawad,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

On 20 November 2015 at 09:37, Balázs Gibizer wrote: >> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] >> Sent: November 19, 2015 23:29 >> On 11/19/2015 4:05 PM, Ryan Rossiter wrote: >> > Reading through [1] I started getting worries in the back of my head >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Migration progress

On 23/11/15 11:02, John Garbutt wrote: On 23 November 2015 at 08:36, Paul Carlton wrote: John At the live migration sub team meeting I undertook to look at the issue of progress reporting. The use cases I'm envisaging are... As a user I want to know how much longer

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Important notice about running tests for python-fuelclient

Hi fulers! I’d like to let you know that because of the bug [1] in tox 2.2.1 we had to change [2] tox.ini temporarily to unlock the gate until the author of tox is working on the fix for the problem. Those changes in tox.ini revoke all freedom of configuring how tests on one’s local environment

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] mime-types-data requires Ruby version >= 2.0

Move to ruby 2.0 is going to give us more problems? If yes, pin mime-types =) 2015-11-23 5:20 GMT-03:00 Emilien Macchi : > Because of [1], [2] and [3]: all beaker-rspec-dsvm-trusty jobs are broken. > > The only one option I see is to pin mime-types in beaker dependencies, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova]Move encryptors to os-brick

Hi Daniel Much of this got discussed before. Encrypted images uploaded to glance aren't shareable, and there is definitely a desire by many users to keep the usual glance functionality while having encryption at rest in cinder for e.g. regulatory purposes. There is also some desire to be able

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Young Yang wrote: > Really thanks for responsing so rapidly!! > > @ozamiatin > I forget to mention that I've run rejoin-stack.sh and manually started > apache. > However, something is not still properly configured. Such as lvm volume >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Location of TripleO REST API

On 11/17/2015 04:31 PM, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: On 10 November 2015 at 15:08, Tzu-Mainn Chen > wrote: Hi all, At the last IRC meeting it was

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Post-release bump after 2014.2.4?

Vincent Untz wrote: Le lundi 23 novembre 2015, à 13:17 +0100, Ihar Hrachyshka a écrit : Vincent Untz wrote: Hi, I know 2014.2.4 is (in theory) the last juno release, but I'd still expect to see a post-release bump to 2014.2.5 in git, to avoid any confusion

[openstack-dev] [Oslo][all] Major bump in oslo library version today (Drop py2.6)

So... Today Oslo libraries will be dropping python 2.6 support and bumping up their Major versions. Details are here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248391/ Tested the py27/py34 tox targets for 8 openstack projects: https://travis-ci.org/dims/ Thanks, Dims -- Davanum Srinivas ::

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] mime-types-data requires Ruby version >= 2.0

On 11/23/2015 12:45 PM, Iury Gregory wrote: > Move to ruby 2.0 is going to give us more problems? If yes, pin > mime-types =) Ruby 2.0 is not supported & shipped by Ubuntu Trusty (Current LTS). So we have to support Ruby 1.x until Ubuntu 16.01 (next LTS), which should be end of mitaka cycle. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of Docker containers on the Fuel master node

Hi all, as you know, Rally runs inside docker on Fuel master node, so docker removal (good improvement) is a problem for Rally users. To solve this, I'm planning to make native Rally installation on Fuel master node that is running on CentOS 7, and then make a step-by-step instruction how to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Important notice about running tests for python-fuelclient

Missing links from this email: [1] https://bitbucket.org/hpk42/tox/issues/285/tox-220-breaks-some-toxini-config-files [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247452/6 On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote: > Hi fulers! > I’d like to let you know that because

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [Fuel UI] Support of separate provisioning is blocked by backend issues

Evgeniy, That's also a good point. Due to all these issues and need to significantly change Nailgun for this feature we decided to move it out of 8.0 and come back to it in the next release so that we can design and implement everything properly. 2015-11-23 16:49 GMT+07:00 Evgeniy L

[openstack-dev] [rating] CloudKitty 23rd meeting agenda

Hi, I'm back from Japan, we'll start having regular meetings again. Here's today's agenda: * New contributions * Gnocchi support * Pending reviews * Road to version 0.5 * Next version goals During this meeting we need to iron out remaining bugs to prepare release 0.5. As

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Post-release bump after 2014.2.4?

Vincent Untz wrote: Hi, I know 2014.2.4 is (in theory) the last juno release, but I'd still expect to see a post-release bump to 2014.2.5 in git, to avoid any confusion as to what lives in git. This is especially useful if people build new tarballs from git. Any objection

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer][aodh][vitrage] Raising custom alarms in AODH

Hi, We have a couple of questions regarding AODH alarms. In Vitrage[1] project we have two use cases that involve Ceilometer: 1. Import Ceilometer alarms, as well as alarms and resources from other sources (Nagios, Zabbix, Nova, Heat, etc.), and produce RCA insights about the connection

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

Really thanks for responsing so rapidly!! @ozamiatin I forget to mention that I've run rejoin-stack.sh and manually started apache. However, something is not still properly configured. Such as lvm volume group is not created. @jordan.pittier Really thanks for you OFFLINE advice. It make

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of Docker containers on the Fuel master node

Bogdan brings up a good point. fuel-createmirror in its current state pulls down an Ubuntu container and uses apt utilities inside. I know it's being replaced, but it's one instance of an item that might be overlooked by this process. On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of Docker containers on the Fuel master node

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 23.11.2015 12:47, Aleksandr Maretskiy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > as you know, Rally runs inside docker on Fuel master node, so docker > > removal (good improvement) is a problem for Rally users. > > > > To solve

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

On 11/23/2015 12:07 PM, Oleksii Zamiatin wrote: On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Young Yang > wrote: Hi, I'm using devstack to deploy stable/Kilo in my Xenserver. I successfully deploy devstack. But I found that every time I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] When to use parameters vs parameter_defaults

On 11/20/2015 07:05 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: Thinking about this some more makes me wonder if we need a sample config generator like oslo.config. It would work off something similar to the capabilities map, where you would say SSL: templates: -puppet/extraconfig/tls/tls-cert-inject.yaml

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova]Move encryptors to os-brick

Hi, Except creating encrypted volume from images, uploading encrypted volumes to image, as Duncan said there is desire to migrate volumes between encrypted and unencrypted type. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248593/ And key magagment codes are duplicated in Cinder and Nova:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] FKs in the DB

Jordan Pittier said on Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:59:35AM +0100: > Is the DB the limiting factor of openstack performance ? De we have hard > evidence of this ? We need numbers before acting otherwise it will be an > endless discussion. Properly parallelised workers scale linearly. Persistent

[openstack-dev] [stable] Post-release bump after 2014.2.4?

Hi, I know 2014.2.4 is (in theory) the last juno release, but I'd still expect to see a post-release bump to 2014.2.5 in git, to avoid any confusion as to what lives in git. This is especially useful if people build new tarballs from git. Any objection against this, before I send patches? :-)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Call for review focus

On 11/20/2015 03:54 AM, Armando M. wrote: On 19 November 2015 at 18:26, Assaf Muller > wrote: On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Armando M. > wrote: > Hi Neutrites, > > We are

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Migration progress

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 08:36:32AM +, Paul Carlton wrote: > John > > At the live migration sub team meeting I undertook to look at the issue > of progress reporting. > > The use cases I'm envisaging are... > > As a user I want to know how much longer my instance will be migrating > for. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of Docker containers on the Fuel master node

On 23.11.2015 12:47, Aleksandr Maretskiy wrote: > Hi all, > > as you know, Rally runs inside docker on Fuel master node, so docker > removal (good improvement) is a problem for Rally users. > > To solve this, I'm planning to make native Rally installation on Fuel > master node that is running on

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Random ssh errors in gate check jobs

On 23 November 2015 at 01:36, Major Hayden wrote: > Hey folks, > > Some of my recent reviews have been frequent fliers in the land of CI gate > jobs and I've spent a fair amount of time diagnosing random ssh failures to > containers in AIO builds. The error I get most often is

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Location of TripleO REST API

On 17 November 2015 at 15:31, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: > > -- > > > > On 10 November 2015 at 15:08, Tzu-Mainn Chen wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> At the last IRC meeting it was agreed that the new TripleO REST API >> should forgo the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Important notice about running tests for python-fuelclient

Maciej, thank you very much for providing the links. Sorry for inconvenience. - romcheg > 23 лист. 2015 р. о 12:48 Maciej Kwiek написав(ла): > > Missing links from this email: > [1] > https://bitbucket.org/hpk42/tox/issues/285/tox-220-breaks-some-toxini-config-files >

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Post-release bump after 2014.2.4?

Le lundi 23 novembre 2015, à 13:17 +0100, Ihar Hrachyshka a écrit : > Vincent Untz wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I know 2014.2.4 is (in theory) the last juno release, but I'd still > >expect to see a post-release bump to 2014.2.5 in git, to avoid any > >confusion as to what lives in

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack]Question about using Devstack

Hi Young, venv create: /opt/stack/tempest/.tox/venv venv installdeps: -r/opt/stack/tempest/requirements.txt, -r/opt/stack/tempest/test-requirements.txt ERROR: invocation failed (exit code 1), logfile: /opt/stack/tempest/.tox/venv/log/venv-1.log ERROR: actionid: venv msg: getenv cmdargs:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][fwaas]some architectural advice on fwaas driver writing

I am checking the vyatta driver now and they replaced l3 agent with their own agent and also using a vrouter image for router creation. Our appliance is not virtual :) So for the linkage between services, can service chaining help me? On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:25 AM, Germy Lure

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [Sahara] Block Device Driver updates

Hi Zhidong, Unfortunately stable/kilo branch is opened only for security fixes now. So we can't backport this fix. Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, http://blog.e0ne.info/ On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Zhidong Yu wrote: > It seems there was a bug introduced in Kilo and then

[openstack-dev] Regarding Designate Multi-node issue

Hi All, I have a multi-node production environment setup using Ansible. The basic openstack components packed in their respective containers, are already installed here. Now, I want to install Designate on this existing setup and have its container. I am currently following link :

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][bug] Mitigation to BREACH vulnerability

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 10:00:30PM +, BARTRA, RICK wrote: > Until django releases an official patch for the BREACH vulnerability, I think > we should take a look at django-debreach. The django-debreach package > provides some, possibly enough, protection against a BREACH attack. Its >

[openstack-dev] [puppet] mime-types-data requires Ruby version >= 2.0

Because of [1], [2] and [3]: all beaker-rspec-dsvm-trusty jobs are broken. The only one option I see is to pin mime-types in beaker dependencies, because beaker needs frog and frog needs mime-types. Note beaker is currently broken for ubuntu trusty nodes, because of this change. [1]

[openstack-dev] [nova] Migration progress

John At the live migration sub team meeting I undertook to look at the issue of progress reporting. The use cases I'm envisaging are... As a user I want to know how much longer my instance will be migrating for. As an operator I want to identify any migration that are making slow progress so

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: [Senlin]Support more complicated scalingscenario

Thanks HU yanyan, I still has some questions about your answers, and I respond inline. On 2015/11/23 10:43, Yanyan Hu wrote: Hi, Xu Jun, please find some answers inline. Thanks. 2015-11-20 16:06 GMT+08:00 xu...@cmss.chinamobile.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Getting rid of Docker containers on the Fuel master node

ETA: experimental ISO w/o docker: tonight spec: tomorrow night Vladimir Kozhukalov On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Anastasia Urlapova wrote: > @Vova, > thanks for bringing this up. > The new approach without docker containers on master node really has many >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon] Bug day! Yeah!

Count me in as well. On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 1:53 PM Martin Pavlásek wrote: > Count with me tomorrow! :-) > > > Martin > > > > On 20/11/15 01:02, Lin Hua Cheng wrote: > > Great, I'll be around next Tuesday. > > -Lin > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Rob Cresswell

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] Making stable maintenance its own OpenStack project team

I had few related experience working with Erno for releasing/stable branching and I have to say he significantly clarified/fixed many issue we had. So ++ -Original Message- From: Flavio Percoco [mailto:fla...@redhat.com] Sent: 16 November 2015 17:29 To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [designate][chef] cookbook-openstack-dnsaas

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 20/11/15 21:23, JJ Asghar wrote: > Hey everyone! > > Per our goals for the M cycle, I've started > cookbook-openstack-dnsaas[1]. It's under my namespace for the time > being; but shouldn't be much longer. > > I walked through the developer

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Should we make qpid/proton optional dependencies? (please say yes)

On 23/11/15 10:33 +0100, Victor Stinner wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to use the "extra dependencies" thing in setup.cfg? Robert Collins started a similar change for Oslo DB for make DB drivers optional: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184328/ Sadly, this change was not merged yet.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][CI] recheck/reverify support for Fuel CI jobs

There was a conversation a while ago around explicitly avoiding the empty namespace - see http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-July/041238.html The approach I have used since is "xenserver: recheck" and "xen: recheck". I think the appropriate command should be "fuel:

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting - 11/23/2015

Hi, This is a reminder that we’ll have a team meeting today at #openstack-meeting at 16.00 UTC. Agenda: Review action items Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) Liberty backporting status Open discussion Renat Akhmerov @ Mirantis Inc.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance]Upload encrypted volumes to images

On 23/11/15 03:45 +, Li, Xiaoyan wrote: Hi all, More help about volume encryption is needed. About uploading encrypted volumes to image, there are three options: 1. Glance only keeps non-encrypted images. So when uploading encrypted volumes to image, cinder de-crypts the data and upload.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

On 20/11/2015 5:12 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, gord chung wrote: i think a lot of the complexity we have in versioning is that the projects are too silo'd. i think some of the versioning issues would be irrelevant if the producer knew it's consumers before sending rather

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Versioned notifications... who cares about the version?

given John's reply, i think we should start a new thread? apologies for hijacking log thread. On 23/11/2015 5:01 AM, Alexis Lee wrote: gord chung said on Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 01:32:02PM -0500: On 20/11/15 11:33 AM, Alexis Lee wrote: why would a producer spit out non-useful datapoints? If

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-ovs-dpdk]

Hi qemu version was 2.0.0 does not support mapping hugepage as shared. as a result the dpdk implementation of vhost-user cannot function with this version. Similarly libvirt 1.2.2 has no knowledge of vhost-user. If you are on fedora 21 then the virt-preview repo packages the required Libvirt and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer]:Subscribe and Publish Notification frame work in Ceilometer !

On 22/11/2015 10:04 PM, Srikanth Vavilapalli wrote: We have found a related blueprint *[1],* which is exactly addressing this dynamic provisioning of pipelines via an API and making use of a new data store to store this configuration. But seems like that blueprint was abandoned due its

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance]Upload encrypted volumes to images

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:45:55AM +, Li, Xiaoyan wrote: > Hi all, > More help about volume encryption is needed. > > About uploading encrypted volumes to image, there are three options: > 1. Glance only keeps non-encrypted images. So when uploading encrypted > volumes to image, cinder

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance]Upload encrypted volumes to images

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 07:05:05AM +0100, Philipp Marek wrote: > > About uploading encrypted volumes to image, there are three options: > > 1. Glance only keeps non-encrypted images. So when uploading encrypted > >volumes to image, cinder de-crypts the data and upload. > > 2. Glance maintain

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] workflow

There are lots of references to "workflow" within TripleO conversations these days. We are at (or near) the limit of what we can do within Heat with regards to upgrades. We've got a new TripleO API in the works (a new version of Tuskar basically) that is specifically meant to encapsulates business

[openstack-dev] [api] link definitions guideline to help align differing styles

hello all, there has recently been some activity in the guidelines surrounding the use of links embedded in response objects. it appears that with the recently merged error guideline[1] and the currently frozen pagination guideline[2], that we are on the precipice of introducing a bifurcation

[openstack-dev] [release] process change for closing bugs when patches merge

As part of completing the release automation work and deprecating our use of Launchpad for release content tracking, we also want make some changes to the way patches associated with bugs are handled. Right now, when a patch with Closes-Bug in the commit message merges, the bug status is updated

[openstack-dev] DocImpact Changes

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, The DocImpact flag was implemented back in Havana to make it easier for developers to notify the documentation team when a patch might cause a change in the docs. This has had an overwhelming response, resulting in a huge amount of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] CentOS-7 Transition Plan

Hey Dmitry, Thank you for your effort. I believe it's a huge step forward that opens number of possibilities. > Every container runs systemd as PID 1 process instead of > supervisord or application / daemon. Taking into account that we're going to drop Docker containers, I think it was

  1   2   >