[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dragonflow] IRC Meeting tomorrow (3/28) - 0900 UTC

Hello All, We will have an IRC meeting tomorrow (Monday, 3/28) at 0900 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4 Please review the expected meeting agenda here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Dragonflow You can view last meeting action items and logs here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][openstackclient] Required name option for volumes, snapshots and backups

I think it is worth fixing the client to actually match the API, yes. The client seems to be determined not to actually match the API in lots of ways, e.g. https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+bug/1561666 On 24 March 2016 at 19:08, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Launching Puppet OpenStack Guide

We're very pleased to announce the launch of Puppet OpenStack Guide (p-o-g), a new repository [1] that will host Puppet OpenStack documentation for developers, operators and users. Until now, we use OpenStack Wiki [2] and we'll progressively move the bits to p-o-g. The usage of p-o-g will allow

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][kolla][release] Deploying the big tent

From: Adam Young > Reply-To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" > Date: Saturday, March 26, 2016 at 7:10 PM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cross-project] [all] Quotas -- service vs. library

On 03/16/2016 07:10 AM, Attila Fazekas wrote: NO : For any kind of extra quota service. In other places I saw other reasons for a quota service or similar, the actual cost of this approach is higher than most people would think so NO. Maybe Library, But I do not want to see for example the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr][Magnum] Clarification of expanded mission statement

Gal, Thanks for clarifying the initiative. I added “[Magnum]” to the title so that Magnum team members can cast their inputs to this thread (if any). Best regards, Hongbin From: Gal Sagie [mailto:gal.sa...@gmail.com] Sent: March-19-16 6:04 AM To: Fox, Kevin M Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Non-candidacy

> Hi all, > > Thanks for all the fish. But it's time for me to move over and let some > new voices contribute to the OpenStack Technical Committee. > > I will continue to be a proponent for the viewpoint that OpenStack > should be considered a toolkit of small, focused services and utilities,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][kolla][release] Deploying the big tent

On 3/26/2016 11:27 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hey fellow PTLs and core reviewers of those projects, Kolla at present deploys the compute kit, and some other services that folks have added over time including other projects like Ironic, Heat, Mistral, Murano, Magnum, Manilla, and Swift.

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][packaging] Mitaka packaged on gentoo

On 3/25/2016 11:15 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: I've finished packaging mitaka on Gentoo, won't be marked stable for about a month. The version packaged is based off of the stable/mitaka branch (noted by the version being 2016.1.). I haven't found where an upgrade guide is being worked on

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][openstackclient] Required name option for volumes, snapshots and backups

I am going to play the devil's advocate here but why can"t python-openstackclient have its own opinion on the matter ? This CLI seems to be for humans and humans love names/labels/tags and find UUIDS hard to remember. Advanced users who want anonymous volumes can always hit the API directly with

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][openstackclient] Required name option for volumes, snapshots and backups

On 00:40 Mar 28, Jordan Pittier wrote: > I am going to play the devil's advocate here but why can"t > python-openstackclient have its own opinion on the matter ? This CLI seems > to be for humans and humans love names/labels/tags and find UUIDS hard to > remember. Advanced users who want anonymous

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][packaging] Mitaka packaged on gentoo

On 03/27/2016 04:53 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > > On 3/25/2016 11:15 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: >> I've finished packaging mitaka on Gentoo, won't be marked stable for >> about a month. The version packaged is based off of the stable/mitaka >> branch (noted by the version being 2016.1.). I

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][packaging] Mitaka packaged on gentoo

On 3/27/2016 7:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: On 03/27/2016 04:53 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 3/25/2016 11:15 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: I've finished packaging mitaka on Gentoo, won't be marked stable for about a month. The version packaged is based off of the stable/mitaka branch (noted by

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][novaclient] Responses for Deletion Events

On 3/23/2016 4:53 PM, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: There's been some discussion regarding a recent bug [1] where an issue was reported that no confirmation/success message is received from "nova agent-delete". This behavior is inconsistent from other novaclient delete commands which do provide a

[openstack-dev] [dragonflow] question about the schedule during design summit

Hi all, I will have a tight schedule during design summit. I'd like to know about the arrangement in Apr 28-29. So, I can try to re-schedule to fit for the arrangement if needed. Thanks, -- Li Ma (Nick) Email: skywalker.n...@gmail.com

[openstack-dev] [searchlight] Add Nova Keypair Plugin

Hi. I am developing this plugin. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/searchlight/+spec/nova-keypair-plugin However I faced the problem that a admin user can not retrieve a keypair information created by another user. So it is impossible to sync the keypair between OpenStack DB and Elasticsearch,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle] playing tricircle with two node configuration

Hi, all, After I execute the command "nova boot --flavor 1 --image c30b097c-b185-4f70-9fcd-09ffdaee5793 --nic net-id=a9059cde-3065-4615-859a-facd6aa66b76 --availability-zone az1 vm1", there exist some problem with the argument port. In t-ngw.log, I find that the status of port switches from

Re: [openstack-dev] [election][TC] TC Candidacy

On 09:29 Mar 25, Mike Perez wrote: > Hi all! > > I Mike Perez aka. thingee, am announcing my candidacy for a position in the > OpenStack Technical Committee. You can find my submitted candidacy which is > still under review here https://review.openstack.org/297748 > > I am employed by the

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslotest 2.4.0 release (mitaka)

We are thrilled to announce the release of: oslotest 2.4.0: Oslo test framework This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslotest With package available at: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslotest

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.policy 1.6.0 release (mitaka)

We are content to announce the release of: oslo.policy 1.6.0: Oslo Policy library This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.policy With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.reports 1.7.0 release (mitaka)

We are delighted to announce the release of: oslo.reports 1.7.0: oslo.reports library This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.reports With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.privsep 1.4.0 release (mitaka)

We are thrilled to announce the release of: oslo.privsep 1.4.0: OpenStack library for privilege separation This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.privsep With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.service 1.8.0 release (mitaka)

We are happy to announce the release of: oslo.service 1.8.0: oslo.service library This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.service With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.versionedobjects 1.8.0 release (mitaka)

We are content to announce the release of: oslo.versionedobjects 1.8.0: Oslo Versioned Objects library This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.versionedobjects With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.log 3.3.0 release (mitaka)

We are psyched to announce the release of: oslo.log 3.3.0: oslo.log library This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.log With package available at: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.log Please

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.cache 1.6.0 release (mitaka)

We are amped to announce the release of: oslo.cache 1.6.0: Cache storage for Openstack projects. This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.cache With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.concurrency 3.7.0 release (mitaka)

We are satisfied to announce the release of: oslo.concurrency 3.7.0: Oslo Concurrency library This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.concurrency With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.messaging 4.6.0 release (mitaka)

We are content to announce the release of: oslo.messaging 4.6.0: Oslo Messaging API This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.messaging With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.db 4.7.0 release (mitaka)

We are content to announce the release of: oslo.db 4.7.0: Oslo Database library This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.db With package available at: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.db Please

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.middleware 3.8.0 release (mitaka)

We are amped to announce the release of: oslo.middleware 3.8.0: Oslo Middleware library This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.middleware With package available at:

[openstack-dev] [release][stable][oslo] oslo.utils 3.8.0 release (mitaka)

We are jubilant to announce the release of: oslo.utils 3.8.0: Oslo Utility library This release is part of the mitaka stable release series. With source available at: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/oslo.utils With package available at: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/oslo.utils

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Issue with validation and preview due to get_attr==None

On 24-Mar-16 20:26, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > Zane, I like you idea. As example we may discuss some steps for it > during summit session (if it need). > > Also I have another question, which probably came in your heads a lot of times: > Can we somekind improve our existing approach for validation?

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Julia Kreger for core reviewer

Congratulations Julia !! On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:03:34PM -0400, Julia Kreger wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Jim Rollenhagen > > > wrote: > > > > > I'm nominating Julia