Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Encrypted Ephemeral Storage

Thanks Joel. I was able to try this again and can confirm it works as you describe. Cool. Based on the comments to the RBD encryption change [1], it looks like there will be a new direction for ephemeral disk encryption (embedding it in QEMU directly). I assume LVM will work the same way when the

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat]informal meetup during summit

Have a company social tonight, will join you at Friday :) Best Regards, Ethan Lynn xuanlangj...@gmail.com > On Apr 24, 2016, at 10:28, Rico Lin wrote: > > Hi all > Let's settle with fallowing schedule:) > > Monday 7:00 pm at > continentalclub >

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Place kolla-mesos in openstack-attic

+1 - Original Message - From: "Angus Salkeld" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2016 11:01:38 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Place kolla-mesos in

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] Network-sfc project f2f2 meet-up place and time

Hi, Unfortunately I will miss this f2f meeting since I won't arrive until late evening on Tuesday. But I did update the etherpad LouisF posted [1] (during the last IRC meeting) with some topics of interest. If any of them happens to be discussed during Tuesday's meetup, please update the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 On 4/25/16 1:07 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: OK, there is enough interest, I'll find a place on 6th Street for us and get a reservation for Thursday around 7 or so. Thanks folks! On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Zhou, Han wrote: +1 :) Han Zhou Irc: zhouhan On Monday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

Kyle, If it is open to all would like to join too. Regards John __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 On 25 Apr 2016 16:48, "Carl Baldwin" wrote: > +1 > On Apr 25, 2016 10:57 AM, "Kyle Mestery" wrote: > >> Ihar, Henry and I were talking and we thought Thursday night makes sense >> for a Neutron social in Austin. If others agree, reply on this thread

Re: [openstack-dev] More on the topic of DELIMITER, the Quota Management Library proposal

On 23 Apr 2016 14:26, "Jay Pipes" wrote: > On 04/23/2016 03:18 PM, Mike Perez wrote: >> How about extending a volume? A volume is a resource and can be extended in >> Cinder today. > > > Yep, understood :) I recognize some resource amounts can be modified for some resource

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 On Apr 25, 2016 10:57 AM, "Kyle Mestery" wrote: > Ihar, Henry and I were talking and we thought Thursday night makes sense > for a Neutron social in Austin. If others agree, reply on this thread and > we'll find a place. > > Thanks! > Kyle > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

On 25 April 2016 at 10:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > WAT??? > > It was never supposed to be core only. Everyone is welcome! > In fact this should be cross-posted the other openstack ML too. > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 25 Apr 2016, at 11:56, Edgar Magana

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Fuel 9.0 is released

On Mon, Apr 25 2016, you wrote: > Can we support alternative way to download ISO since p2p may be prevented in > some company IT? Hello, It is supported... but not advertised. I am not sure if this is by purpose (maybe because in http there is no additional checksum, see later for offline

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

> On Apr 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > WAT??? > > It was never supposed to be core only. Everyone is welcome! +2 irony intended. Socials are not controlled by gerrit ACLs. :-) doug > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 25 Apr 2016, at 11:56, Edgar

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

WAT??? It was never supposed to be core only. Everyone is welcome! Sent from my iPhone > On 25 Apr 2016, at 11:56, Edgar Magana wrote: > > Would you extend it to ex-cores? > > Edgar > > > > >> On 4/25/16, 10:55 AM, "Kyle Mestery" wrote: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

Count me in. --N. On Monday, April 25, 2016, Kyle Mestery wrote: > Ihar, Henry and I were talking and we thought Thursday night makes sense > for a Neutron social in Austin. If others agree, reply on this thread and > we'll find a place. > > Thanks! > Kyle > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Encrypted Ephemeral Storage

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:28:17PM +, Coffman, Joel M. wrote: > Based on the comments to the RBD encryption change [1], it looks > like there will be a new direction for ephemeral disk encryption > (embedding it in QEMU directly). I assume LVM will work the same > way when the time comes. Will

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

Ihar, Henry and I were talking and we thought Thursday night makes sense for a Neutron social in Austin. If others agree, reply on this thread and we'll find a place. Thanks! Kyle __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 Regards, Martin - Martin Hickey | Software Development | OpenStack | Tel: + 353 21 7306040 From: Nate Johnston To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: 25/04/2016 10:58

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 :) Han Zhou Irc: zhouhan On Monday, April 25, 2016, Korzeniewski, Artur wrote: > Sign me up :) > > Artur > IRC: korzen > > -Original Message- > From: Darek Smigiel [mailto:smigiel.dari...@gmail.com ] > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 7:19 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

OK, there is enough interest, I'll find a place on 6th Street for us and get a reservation for Thursday around 7 or so. Thanks folks! On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Zhou, Han wrote: > +1 :) > > Han Zhou > Irc: zhouhan > > > On Monday, April 25, 2016, Korzeniewski, Artur >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

On 25/04/16 10:58, Kyle Mestery wrote: > Ihar, Henry and I were talking and we thought Thursday night makes sense for > a Neutron social in Austin. If others agree, reply on this thread and we'll > find a place. That sounds good to me - thanks for thinking of it! Neil

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat]informal meetup during summit

Thanks for organising Rico! See you when you get there. - ZB On 22/04/16 20:01, Rico Lin wrote: Let's settle down on with A meet up on Monday night 7:00pm At continentalclub address : 1315 S

Re: [openstack-dev] [searchlight] [ceilometer] [fuel] [freezer] [monasca] Elasticsearch 2.x gate support

On 24/04/2016 6:53 PM, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18 2016, McLellan, Steven wrote: > > Hi Steven, > > […] > >> * Have you tested with ES 2.x at all? >> * Do you have plans to move to ES 2.x? > > I don't think we have tested that nor anyone working actively on ES. > Gordon Chung is

[openstack-dev] [HA] Watcher Meethings

Hi all, In Austin summit, Susanne Balle (with Watcher team) invite HA people to come to Watcher sessions and discuss the use case. FYI, here are the watcher sessions and mail they sent to watcher team. On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Antoine Cabot wrote: > Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] Watcher meetings in Austin

Hi Watcher team, Resending this in case folks missed it. Thanks, Joe (jwcroppe) > On Apr 22, 2016, at 4:37 AM, Antoine Cabot wrote: > > Hi Watcher team, > > We will have a couple of meetings next week to discuss Watcher > achievements during the Mitaka cycle and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Newton Design Summit sessions planning

Fuelers I am OK with the proposed change 21 апр. 2016 г. 12:34 пользователь "Vitaly Kramskikh" < vkramsk...@mirantis.com> написал: > Folks, > > I'd like to request workroom sessions swap. > > I planned to lead a discussion of Fuel UI modularization on Wed > 11.00-11.40, but at the same time

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][vpnaas] VPNaaS tox api failure

Hi Henry, Do you have any info on below query in the thread.(is 'tox -e api' working in neutron-vpnaas ?) Thanks, bharath From: bharath Sent: 08 April 2016 01:53 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Alex

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Neutron][Monasca] Traffic counters at Layer 3

Hi folks, I'm writing a plugin for Monasca to monitor traffic at layer 3. My Neutron backend is OVS and I'm using iptables of network namespaces for getting traffic counters. Would the following rules in router namespace cover all the traffic at layer 3 per router per tenant? - Chain

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > OK, there is enough interest, I'll find a place on 6th Street for us > and get a reservation for Thursday around 7 or so. > > Thanks folks! > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Zhou, Han wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Devstack liberty with keystone v3

The trick is to let devstack install and then switch openrc to IDENTITY_API_VERSION=3. Both v2 and v3 endpoints are created already. The tools just need to be told to use them. From: kiran vemuri UH [kkvem...@uh.edu] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 4:10 PM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] Devstack liberty with keystone v3

what you need is this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/307574/ after install finished, to use admin:demo account and v3 API, run ``source openrc -k3 admin``, then it is done. Cheers! On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:10 AM, kiran vemuri UH wrote: > Hello All, > > I recently

[openstack-dev] Devstack liberty with keystone v3

Hello All, I recently got started with OpenStack with a goal of bringing up a multi region setup i.e., 2 regions using the same keystone service. I started with devstack liberty stable release by following the documentation available at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] Place kolla-mesos in openstack-attic

+1 On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Ryan Hallisey wrote: > +1 > > - Original Message - > From: "Angus Salkeld" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Sent: Sunday, April

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat]informal meetup during summit

We are now at Terry black's BBQ now for anyone who wants to join usThanks for organising Rico! See you when you get there. - ZB On 22/04/16 20:01, Rico Lin wrote: > Let's settle down on with > > A meet up on Monday night 7:00pm > At continentalclub >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 On Mon, Apr 25, 2016, 5:32 PM Armando M. wrote: > On 25 April 2016 at 10:01, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > >> WAT??? >> >> It was never supposed to be core only. Everyone is welcome! >> > > In fact this should be cross-posted the other openstack ML too. >

[openstack-dev] Block Device Mapping is Invalid

I just upgraded to RDO Kilo and no longer can boot volumes. I never see anything hit cinder, so I think the issue is inside of nova. I have been banging my head on this one all day, would love any help anyone can provide. [root@openstack nova(keystone)]# nova --debug boot --flavor 2 --boot-volume

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Encrypted Ephemeral Storage

Based on the comments to the RBD encryption change [1], it looks like there will be a new direction for ephemeral disk encryption (embedding it in QEMU directly). I assume LVM will work the same way when the time comes. Will there be a migration path for the existing ephemeral disk encryption

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

I’m in. > On Apr 25, 2016, at 11:24 AM, Martin Hickey wrote: > > +1 > > Regards, > Martin > - > Martin Hickey | Software Development | OpenStack | Tel: + 353 21 7306040 > > Nate Johnston ---25/04/2016 10:58:21---Count me in. --N. > > From: Nate Johnston

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

Would you extend it to ex-cores? Edgar On 4/25/16, 10:55 AM, "Kyle Mestery" wrote: >Ihar, Henry and I were talking and we thought Thursday night makes sense for a >Neutron social in Austin. If others agree, reply on this thread and we'll find >a place. > >Thanks!

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

I know! Just having fun and teasing Kyle. ;-) Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 25, 2016, at 12:08 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > WAT??? > > It was never supposed to be core only. Everyone is welcome! > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 25 Apr 2016, at 11:56, Edgar Magana

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

Count me in! On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > WAT??? > > It was never supposed to be core only. Everyone is welcome! > ++ > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 25 Apr 2016, at 11:56, Edgar Magana wrote: > > > > Would you

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

Count me in! Will be good to meet all you guys! Darek (dasm) Smigiel > On Apr 25, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Doug Wiegley > wrote: > > >> On Apr 25, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: >> >> WAT??? >> >> It was never supposed to be core

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

Sign me up :) Artur IRC: korzen -Original Message- From: Darek Smigiel [mailto:smigiel.dari...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 7:19 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 Michael On Monday, April 25, 2016, Ananth wrote: > Would be great to connect.. > +1 > > Regards > Ananth > Cloud & Network Solutions > Cisco Systems > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Zhipeng Huang

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 AZBiswas > On Apr 25, 2016, at 1:25 PM, Michael Johnson wrote: > > +1 > > Michael > > On Monday, April 25, 2016, Ananth > wrote: > Would be great to connect.. > +1 > > Regards > Ananth > Cloud & Network Solutions >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

I'd love to join as well! On 4/25/2016 3:56 PM, Brian Haley wrote: +1 On 4/25/16 1:07 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: OK, there is enough interest, I'll find a place on 6th Street for us and get a reservation for Thursday around 7 or so. Thanks folks! On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Zhou, Han

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 On 4/25/16 1:07 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: OK, there is enough interest, I'll find a place on 6th Street for us and get a reservation for Thursday around 7 or so. Thanks folks! On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Zhou, Han wrote: +1 :) Han Zhou Irc: zhouhan On Monday,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

Would be great to connect.. +1 Regards Ananth Cloud & Network Solutions Cisco Systems On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > >> OK, there is enough interest, I'll find a

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+1 On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Kyle Mestery wrote: > OK, there is enough interest, I'll find a place on 6th Street for us > and get a reservation for Thursday around 7 or so. > > Thanks folks! > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Zhou, Han wrote: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Newton Design Summit sessions planning

​Done. Wed 11:00-11:40 Finalizing of HA reference architecture with event-based control and fencing Thu 11:00-11:40 Fuel UI Modularization approaches discussion Vladimir Kozhukalov On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:14 PM, Vladimir Kuklin wrote: > Fuelers > > I am OK with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database

Excerpts from Andrew Laski's message of 2016-04-22 14:32:59 -0700: > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016, at 04:27 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > > OK, so I know that Friday afternoons are usually the worst times to > > write a blog post and start an email discussion, and that the Friday > > immediately before a

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] Mirantis participation in kolla-mesos project and shift towards Kubernetes

On 4/24/16, 10:05 PM, "Tomasz Pa" wrote: >On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 2:27 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) >wrote: >> >> Trying to understand the issue here, do you believe the current jinja2 >> Dockerfiles are not readable? I'm pretty sure my 11 and 13 year old >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] Mirantis participation in kolla-mesos project and shift towards Kubernetes

Tomasz, Response inline. On 4/25/16, 12:32 AM, "Tomasz Pa" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:51 AM, Jeffrey Zhang >wrote: >> >> I do not think this is the issue of Kolla. It is a issue of Docker >> images. All the docker images has such issue. This

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database

On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Clint Byrum wrote: RPC being a different animal, we're, frankly, abusing RabbitMQ in silly ways. There are a _massive_ pile of simpler things just waiting to be tried: Yes, very much yes. I think much of the rest of the discussions about improving the architecture of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Fuel 9.0 is released

Can we support alternative way to download ISO since p2p may be prevented in some company IT? Thanks, -Ruijing From: Vladimir Kozhukalov [mailto:vkozhuka...@mirantis.com] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 10:52 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Magnum] Magnum supports 2 Nova flavor to provision minion nodes

Hi Ricardo, This is really good suggestion. I'd like to see whether we can use "foreach"/"repeat" in ResourceGroup in Heat. Regards, Gary Duan -Original Message- From: Ricardo Rocha [mailto:rocha.po...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 3:49 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] Mirantis participation in kolla-mesos project and shift towards Kubernetes

I really hadnt thought about distro deps for non containers leaking into containers like nova->libvirt. What about making a kolla-container rpm that provides a virtual libvirt package and anything else not actually needed in the container? Thanks, Kevin From:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel][plugins] Changing role regex from '*' to ['/.*/'] breaks MOS compatibility

You are welcome! On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Guillaume Thouvenin wrote: > Yes this patch fixes the issue. > Thanks Ilya. > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Ilya Kutukov > wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> I think your problem is related to the: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][kubernetes] Mirantis participation in kolla-mesos project and shift towards Kubernetes

FYI, in the current implementation, a single image seems big, around 300MB - 1G. But when push all the image to the registry service, you will find that the total size of the images is just 2GB. When distribute the image, It just takes less 30s to transfer images( 2GB / 100MB/s < 30s ). This is

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

Count me in. +1. Thanks Swami -Original Message- From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 11:07 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

Hi Kyle, Thanks for this. Count me in. Cathy -Original Message- From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 11:07 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit OK, there

[openstack-dev] [TC][tricircle] ask help from TC and other guru in the OpenStack community

Hi, TCs and guru, If tricircle planned to apply being TC approved big tent project, would someone help to guide our project? I would like to have one virtual design summit for Tricircle on UTC 2:00am on Friday ( Beijing Time 10:00am Apr. 29), ( Austin time: 9:00pm Apr.28 ) Best Regards

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] Network-sfc project f2f2 meet-up place and time

Hi Stephen, Yes, I will take notes on the etherpad. Thanks, Cathy From: Stephen Wong [mailto:stephen.kf.w...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 3:05 PM To: Cathy Zhang Cc: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc]

[openstack-dev] [tricircle] virtual design summit for Newton

Hello, Most of our team members in Tricircle are not able to attend the OpenStack Austin summit, so we have to have a virtual design summit: One etherpad is opened for the topics to be discussed for the Newton design summit, please list the topics you want to discuss in the etherpad:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Social at the summit

+2 :p On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Vasudevan, Swaminathan (PNB Roseville) < swaminathan.vasude...@hpe.com> wrote: > Count me in. +1. > > Thanks > Swami > > -Original Message- > From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com] > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 11:07 AM > To: OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] Network-sfc project f2f2 meet-up place and time

Hi Cathy and folks interested in SFC and classifers! Can't we use a different room like Salon D? Salon C is a lunch room and at that time there are no sessions in other rooms. It would be great if we can use Salon D or E (after looking at the first day's session) I think we can gather more easily

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Neutron][Monasca] Traffic counters at Layer 3

On 25 April 2016 at 11:20, Rubab Syed wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm writing a plugin for Monasca to monitor traffic at layer 3. My Neutron > backend is OVS and I'm using iptables of network namespaces for getting > traffic counters. Would the following rules in router

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Neutron][Monasca] Traffic counters at Layer 3

Neutron already supports L3 router with network namespaces which send notifications, as Armando mentioned. Ceilometer can consume these notification and I think monisca can do similar things. I believe you can collect enough information for neutron ovs implementation. 2016-04-25 13:20 GMT-05:00

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] Error runnig py27

thanks On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 7:51 AM, joehuang wrote: > Hello, Khayam, > > > > You can write the test case for the exception like : > http://paste.openstack.org/show/494530/ > > > > Best Regards > > Chaoyi Huang ( Joe Huang ) > > > > *From:* Khayam Gondal

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Distributed Database

On 04/25/2016 03:06 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Clint Byrum wrote: RPC being a different animal, we're, frankly, abusing RabbitMQ in silly ways. There are a _massive_ pile of simpler things just waiting to be tried: Yes, very much yes. I think much of the rest of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-manuals] What the status of DocImpact

Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2016-04-24 15:54:03 -0500: > On 4/24/2016 8:03 AM, ZhiQiang Fan wrote: > > but Document Team has so beautiful tables, and so convenient tools > > , it is a huge waste of resource if we manually > > write it to release note in each project. > > > > So I

[openstack-dev] [nova][live migration] Feature exposure

Hello, Last week I started thread [1] on openstack-operators to ask Openstack users about the way to expose features for live-migrations. So here are results: *16,7%* - All this features should work under the hood and I don't want to enable them manually over Nova API *33,3%* - There should be