[openstack-dev] [Solum] Proposal to change weekly IRC meeting time

2016-05-24 Thread Devdatta Kulkarni
Hi team, In today's IRC meeting [1], we discussed about changing our weekly IRC meeting time from current time of 1700 UTC to 1400 UTC to allow our team members from Germany, India, and China to participate regularly. I have submitted a WIP patch [2] to make this change. Please provide your

Re: [openstack-dev] [aodh] Tempest gate not working

2016-05-24 Thread Tony Breeds
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 04:50:21PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > So it turns out we tried (especially Ryota) to add Tempest support via > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/303921/ for Aodh's gate, but it does > not actually run Tempest. Your gate scripts didn't like tempest as an enabled

Re: [openstack-dev] [aodh] Tempest gate not working

2016-05-24 Thread Ryota Mibu
Hi Tony, That 'gate_hook.sh' is not good for tempest jobs. DEVSTACK_GATE_TEMPEST is set 0 in that script, and default one seems better (devstack-gate/devstack-vm-gate.sh) . https://review.openstack.org/#/c/320770/ BR, Ryota > -Original Message- > From: Tony Breeds

Re: [openstack-dev] [Swift3] improve multi-delete performance

2016-05-24 Thread Kota TSUYUZAKI
Hello kirubakaran, Thanks for contributing Swift3, that sounds great. I wonder if you could push the diff as a patch to gerrit code review which is the review system for openstack and openstack related projects. The entry point for "how to contribute for openstack" is here,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral][Zaqar][Ceilometer][Searchlight] Triggering Mistral workflows from Zaqar messages

2016-05-24 Thread Fei Long Wang
On 25/05/16 07:52, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 22/05/16 22:38, Lingxian Kong wrote: >> Hi, Zane, I think you must be interested in this: >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308664/ > > Oh! Yes that is very interesting. I'm glad that other people are > thinking about these kinds of problems also. > >

[openstack-dev] [docs][install-guide] Install Guide Naming

2016-05-24 Thread Lana Brindley
Hi everyone, As part of the massive Install Guide changes the docs team are implementing in Newton, we need to come up with a name for what *was* the Install Guide. We need to emphasise the fact that it should be used for learning purposes only, not for installing a production cloud. So go

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] bonding?

2016-05-24 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-05-24 07:51:21 -0400: > Hi, > > There's rumors floating around about Neutron having a bonding model in > the near future. Are there any solid plans for that? > > For context, as part of the multitenant networking work, ironic has a > portgroup

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

2016-05-24 Thread Elzur, Uri
Hi Tim Sorry for the delay due to travel... This note is very helpful! We are in agreement that the team including the individuals cited below are supportive. We also agree that SFC belongs in the networking-SFC project (with proper API adjustment) It seems networking-sfc still holds the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova][horizon] Serial console support for ironic instances

2016-05-24 Thread Yuiko Takada
Hi! Hironori, Lucas, thank you for bringing this topic up! Yes, as Lucas says, our latest spec is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319505 I and Tien, Hironori, Akira discussed and merged our idea. And new Nova spec is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319507 As you guys know, Nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [craton] meeting notes

2016-05-24 Thread sean roberts
I missed that bi-weekly all four meeting slot are taken at 14:30 UTC Mondays. I am going to move the meeting to 15:00 UTC. Speak up if that doesn't work for you. On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:45 AM, sean roberts wrote: > Hello project team members. We have one week until

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

2016-05-24 Thread Elzur, Uri
Hi Armando Pls see below [UE] Thx Uri (“Oo-Ree”) C: 949-378-7568 From: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 9:08 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support

[openstack-dev] [kuryr][magnum]Installing kuryr for mutlinode openstack setup

2016-05-24 Thread Akshay Kumar Sanghai
Hi, I have a 4 node openstack setup (1 controller, 1 network, 2 compute nodes). I want to install kuryr in liberty version. I cannot find a package in ubuntu repo. -How do i install kuryr? - what are the components that need to be installed on the respective nodes? - Do i need to install magnum

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

2016-05-24 Thread Alex Xu
Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [PTLs][all][mentoring] Mentors needed in specific technical areas

2016-05-24 Thread Augustina Ragwitz
>> On 12:54 May 24, Augustina Ragwitz wrote: >> Hi Emily, >> >> I'm the Nova Mentoring Czar and we have a Wiki page with a list of >> projects that would be good for new contributors: >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Mentoring >> >> For Nova, I'd encourage potential contributors to get

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: keystone federation user story

2016-05-24 Thread Adam Young
On 05/24/2016 01:55 PM, Alexander Makarov wrote: Colleagues, here is an actual use case for shadow users assignments, let's discuss possible solutions: all suggestions are appreciated. -- Forwarded message -- From: *Andrey Grebennikov*

Re: [openstack-dev] [aodh] Tempest gate not working

2016-05-24 Thread Ryota Mibu
Julien, Thank you for the heads up. I'll check aodh tempest tests, and also drop tempest full tests in ceilometer since the code for ceilometer was removed from tempest. BR, Ryota > -Original Message- > From: Julien Danjou [mailto:jul...@danjou.info] > Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [higgins] Continued discussion from the last team meeting

2016-05-24 Thread Qiming Teng
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:55:28PM +, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi all, > > At the last team meeting, we tried to define the scope of the Higgins > project. In general, we agreed to focus on the following features as an > initial start: > > * Build a container abstraction and use docker

Re: [openstack-dev] [higgins] Continued discussion from the last team meeting

2016-05-24 Thread Yanyan Hu
Hi, Hongbing, thanks a lot for the summary! The following is my thoughts on those two questions left: About container composition, it is a really useful and important feature for enduser. But based on my understanding, user can actually achieve the same goal by leveraging other high level

Re: [openstack-dev] [OVN] [networking-ovn] [networking-sfc] SFC and OVN

2016-05-24 Thread John McDowall
Ryan, Thanks for getting back to me and pointing me in a more OVS like direction. What you say makes sense, let me hack something together. I have been a little distracted getting some use cases together. The other area is how to better map the flow-classifier I have been thinking about it a

Re: [openstack-dev] [aodh] Tempest gate not working

2016-05-24 Thread liusheng
Hi, Thanks for this mail, I also noticed that yesterday, and I am trying to fix it by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/320378/ cheers, Liusheng 在 2016/5/24 22:50, Julien Danjou 写道: Hi, So it turns out we tried (especially Ryota) to add Tempest support via

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: keystone federation user story

2016-05-24 Thread Adam Young
On 05/24/2016 10:30 PM, Adam Young wrote: On 05/24/2016 01:55 PM, Alexander Makarov wrote: Colleagues, here is an actual use case for shadow users assignments, let's discuss possible solutions: all suggestions are appreciated. -- Forwarded message -- From: *Andrey

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] A friendly reminder about reviews

2016-05-24 Thread Erlon Cruz
Cinder is definitely lacking reviewing force. I remember 2 years ago comparing with today and I can tell that patches are taking a lot longer to get reviewed. This link is also very useful to triage incoming patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/?foreach=project:^openstack/.*cinder.*

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Need helps to implement the full baremetals support

2016-05-24 Thread Yuanying OTSUKA
Hi, Hongbin, Spyros. I’m also interesting this work. I have workaround patch to support ironic. (but currently conflict with master. Is it helpful to upload it for initial step of the implementation? Thanks -yuanying 2016年5月25日(水) 6:52 Hongbin Lu : > Hi all, > > > > One

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum][kuryr] Nested containers networking

2016-05-24 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi Hongbin, Thank you for starting this thread. The person that is going to work on this integration is Fawad (CC'ed) and hopefully others will help him (We have another person from Huawei that showed intrest in working on this). I think Fawad, given that he is the primary person working on this

[openstack-dev] [Infra][Cinder] Nominating Zadara Storage VPSA CI for voting permissions

2016-05-24 Thread Shlomi Avihou
Hello, I’d like to nominate Zadara Storage VPSA CI system for voting permissions in the Cinder program. The CI system has been posting comments (non-voting) for the past 24 days. *Third Party system info: * https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems/ZadaraStorage_VPSA_CI *Ci

[openstack-dev] [higgins] Should we rename "Higgins"?

2016-05-24 Thread Shuu Mutou
Hi all, Unfortunately "higgins" is used by media server project on Launchpad and CI software on PYPI. Now, we use "python-higgins" for our project on Launchpad. IMO, we should rename project to prevent increasing points to patch. How about "Gatling"? It's only association from Magnum. It's not

[openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] resolving issues with Intel NFV CI

2016-05-24 Thread Znoinski, Waldemar
Hi all, There is an issue with jobs under Intel NFV CI not being registered. The issue is currently being investigated. ThirdPartySystems Wiki was updated. Updates to follow. Waldemar Znoinski -- Intel Research and Development

[openstack-dev] [oslo] Log spool in the context

2016-05-24 Thread Alexis Lee
Hi, I have a spec: https://review.openstack.org/227766 and implementation: https://review.openstack.org/316162 for adding a spooling logger to oslo.log. Neither is merged yet, reviews welcome. Looking at how I'd actually integrate this into Nova, most classes do: LOG =

[openstack-dev] [Nova] change console proxy URL for cells v2 ?

2016-05-24 Thread Murray, Paul (HP Cloud)
I am implementing the following spec and have encountered a problem related to the form of the console proxy URL provided to uses. https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/newton/approved/convert-consoles-to-objects.html The spec changes the representation of the console auth

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-24 Thread Duncan Thomas
Cinder bugs list was far more manageable once this had been done. It is worth sharing the tool for this? I realise it's fairly trivial to write one, but some standardisation on the comment format etc seems valuable, particularly for Q/A folks who work between different projects. On 23 May 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-operators][cinder] max_concurrent_builds in Cinder

2016-05-24 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 24 May 2016 at 05:46, John Griffith wrote: > > ​Just curious about a couple things: Is this attempting to solve a > problem in the actual Cinder Volume Service or is this trying to solve > problems with backends that can't keep up and deliver resources under heavy >

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Live migration meeting today

2016-05-24 Thread Murray, Paul (HP Cloud)
Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaLiveMigration Please add items if you want to guarantee time to talk about them. Paul __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Is verification of images in the image cache necessary?

2016-05-24 Thread Matthew Booth
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:06 AM, John Garbutt wrote: > On 24 May 2016 at 10:16, Matthew Booth wrote: > > During its periodic task, ImageCacheManager does a checksum of every > image > > in the cache. It verifies this checksum against a previously stored

[openstack-dev] [fuel] release version numbers: let's use semvers

2016-05-24 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, A number of Fuel components were previously tagged as "9.0". This isn't compatible with the semver scheme. Could we agree to switch to x.y.z going forward? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo) __ OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 ttx. ("I'd prefer if we didn't have to special-case anyone") -- Dims On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Morgan Fainberg wrote: >> >> [...] If we are accepting golang, I want it to be clearly >> documented that the expectation is it is used

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-24 Thread Markus Zoeller
On 24.05.2016 09:34, Duncan Thomas wrote: > Cinder bugs list was far more manageable once this had been done. > > It is worth sharing the tool for this? I realise it's fairly trivial to > write one, but some standardisation on the comment format etc seems > valuable, particularly for Q/A folks

[openstack-dev] [nova] Is verification of images in the image cache necessary?

2016-05-24 Thread Matthew Booth
During its periodic task, ImageCacheManager does a checksum of every image in the cache. It verifies this checksum against a previously stored value, or creates that value if it doesn't already exist.[1] Based on this information it generates a log message if the image is corrupt, but otherwise

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Thierry Carrez
Chris Dent wrote: [...] I don't really know. I'm firmly in the camp that OpenStack needs to be smaller and more tightly focused if a unitary thing called OpenStack expects to be any good. So I'm curious about and interested in strategies for figuring out where the boundaries are. So that, of

[openstack-dev] [all][oslo_config] Improving Config Option Help Texts

2016-05-24 Thread Erno Kuvaja
Hi all, Based on the not yet merged spec of categorized config options [0] some project seems to have started improving the config option help texts. This is great but I noticed scary trend on clutter to be added on these sections. Now looking individual changes it does not look that bad at all

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 24 May 2016, Thierry Carrez wrote: Chris Dent wrote: So that, of course, leads back to the original question: Is OpenStack supposed to be a unitary. As a data point, since I heard that question rhetorically asked quite a few times over the past year... There is an old answer to that,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Is verification of images in the image cache necessary?

2016-05-24 Thread John Garbutt
On 24 May 2016 at 10:16, Matthew Booth wrote: > During its periodic task, ImageCacheManager does a checksum of every image > in the cache. It verifies this checksum against a previously stored value, > or creates that value if it doesn't already exist.[1] Based on this >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Is verification of images in the image cache necessary?

2016-05-24 Thread Chris Dent
On Tue, 24 May 2016, Matthew Booth wrote: I understand that corruption of bits on disks is a thing, but it's a thing for more than just the image cache. I feel that this is a problem much better solved at other layers, prime candidates being the block and filesystem layers. There are existing

[openstack-dev] update congress

2016-05-24 Thread Yue Xin
Hi Tim and all, May I ask how to update the congress version with the Tokyo Hands on Lab environment? cause I use the command "openstack congress list version" it show the congress is 2013's version. The reason why I want to update it is that I write a demo driver, which I want to push data into

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] YAQL console for master node

2016-05-24 Thread Stanislaw Bogatkin
Hi all, as you maybe know, new conditions for Fuel tasks were recently (in master and mitaka branches) introduced. Right after this I got several questions like 'hey, how can I check my new condition?' Answer could be 'use standard yaql console', but it hasn't have Fuel internal yaql functions

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 24 May 2016 at 02:28, Gregory Haynes wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2016, at 05:24 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > > I really do not want to "special case" swift. It really doesn't go with > the spirit of inclusion. > > > I am not sure how inclusion is related to special casing.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Thierry Carrez
Morgan Fainberg wrote: [...] If we are accepting golang, I want it to be clearly documented that the expectation is it is used exclusively where there is a demonstrable case (such as with swift) and not a carte blanche to use it wherever-you-please. I want this to be a social contract looked

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Is verification of images in the image cache necessary?

2016-05-24 Thread Fichter, Dane G.
Hi John and Matt, I actually have a spec and patch up for review addressing some of what you’re referring to below. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314222/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312210/ I think you’re quite right that the existing ImageCacheManager code serves little purpose. What

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-24 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > Cinder bugs list was far more manageable once this had been done. > > It is worth sharing the tool for this? I realise it's fairly trivial to > write one, but some standardisation on the comment format etc seems >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Geoff O'Callaghan's message of 2016-05-24 15:31:28 +1000: > > > On 24 May 2016, at 3:13 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > > > > [snip] > > > those other needs. Grab a python developer, land some code, and your > > feature is there. > > s/python/whateverlanguage/ >

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] - IRC Meeting time change

2016-05-24 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello Everyone, Just wanted to let you all know we changed our even biweekly IRC meeting time. It is now one hour earlier. The new meeting time is *every even Monday at 14:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4* You can see the changing patch here [1] Thanks Gal. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] release version numbers: let's use semvers

2016-05-24 Thread Igor Kalnitsky
Hey Zigo, In Python community there's a PEP-440 [1] that defines a versioning scheme. The thing you should know is, the PEP __is not__ compatible with semver, and it's totally fine to have two components version. So I don't think we should force version changes from two-components to

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev] scaling nova kvm and neutron l3-ha and ml2+openvswitch

2016-05-24 Thread Tobias Urdin
Hello, (I didn't have any luck with this question on the openstack-operators list so I'm throwing it out here to see if I can catch anyone, according to Assaf he knew a couple of you devs running a similar environment, if not feel free to do what you please with this email hehe) I'm gonna give

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Cinder] Nominating Zadara Storage VPSA CI for voting permissions

2016-05-24 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:47:23AM +0300, Shlomi Avihou wrote: > Hello, > > > > I’d like to nominate Zadara Storage VPSA CI system for voting permissions > in the Cinder program. > > The CI system has been posting comments (non-voting) for the past 24 days. > > > > *Third Party system info:

[openstack-dev] Plans to converge on one ldap client?

2016-05-24 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi All, Are there any plans to converge on one ldap client across projects? Some projects have moved to ldap3 and others are using pyldap (both are in global requirements). The issue we're running into in Ubuntu is that we can only have one ldap client in Ubuntu main, while the others will live

Re: [openstack-dev] [higgins] Should we rename "Higgins"?

2016-05-24 Thread Adrian Otto
Before considering a project rename.m, I suggest you seek guidance from the OpenStack technical committee, and/or the OpenStack-infra team. There is probably a simple workaround to the concern voiced below. -- Adrian > On May 24, 2016, at 1:37 AM, Shuu Mutou wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Suggest to not deprecate os-migrations API

2016-05-24 Thread Sean Dague
On 05/23/2016 10:16 PM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Hi All, > > According > to > https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/releasenotes/notes/os-migrations-ef225e5b309d5497.yaml > , we are going to deprecate the old os-migrations API, and two new APIs: > /servers/{server uuid}/migrations and

[openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] bonding?

2016-05-24 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
Hi, There's rumors floating around about Neutron having a bonding model in the near future. Are there any solid plans for that? For context, as part of the multitenant networking work, ironic has a portgroup concept proposed, where operators can configure bonding for NICs in a baremetal machine.

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-24 Thread Steven Hardy
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:00:35AM +0200, Markus Zoeller wrote: > On 24.05.2016 09:34, Duncan Thomas wrote: > > Cinder bugs list was far more manageable once this had been done. > > > > It is worth sharing the tool for this? I realise it's fairly trivial to > > write one, but some standardisation

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-dev] scaling nova kvm and neutron l3-ha and ml2+openvswitch

2016-05-24 Thread Anna Kamyshnikova
Hi! Recently I performed scale testing of Neutron L3 HA Liberty. Test plan and test results can be found http://docs.openstack.org/developer/performance-docs/index.html. On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Tobias Urdin wrote: > Hello, > > (I didn't have any luck with

[openstack-dev] [nova] Stable disk device instance rescue reviews for libvirt and possible implementation by other virt drivers

2016-05-24 Thread Lee Yarwood
Hello all, https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/virt-rescue-stable-disk-devices I've been aimlessly pushing my patches around for this spec for a while now and would really appreciate reviews from the community. Tempest and devstack patches are also included in the above topic, reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] YAQL console for master node

2016-05-24 Thread Aleksandr Didenko
Hi, thank you Stas, long awaited tool :) Using it right now on the latest Fuel-10.0, very helpful and saves a lot of time (switching between nodes to test yaql for different roles is super cool). Regards, Alex On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stable disk device instance rescue reviews for libvirt and possible implementation by other virt drivers

2016-05-24 Thread Jay Pipes
Hi Lee, I'll try to get to these reviews later this afternoon. Thanks for your patience. Best, -jay On 05/24/2016 08:53 AM, Lee Yarwood wrote: Hello all, https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/virt-rescue-stable-disk-devices I've been aimlessly pushing my patches around for this spec

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-operators][cinder] max_concurrent_builds in Cinder

2016-05-24 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On 23/05, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: > Hi developers and operators, > I would like to get any feedback from you about my idea before I'll start > work on spec. > > In Nova, we've got max_concurrent_builds option [1] to set 'Maximum number > of instance builds to run concurrently' per each compute.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 23/05/16 21:57 +0100, Chris Dent wrote: [snip] So, yet another way to frame the original question (in a loaded way) may be: Are we trying to come up with a way of defining the community that lets us carry on doing what we've been doing, haphazardly, or are we trying to get the process of

[openstack-dev] [aodh] Tempest gate not working

2016-05-24 Thread Julien Danjou
Hi, So it turns out we tried (especially Ryota) to add Tempest support via https://review.openstack.org/#/c/303921/ for Aodh's gate, but it does not actually run Tempest. Otherwise, we would have notice something wrong in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/318052/. As EmilienM noticed in Puppet

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Is verification of images in the image cache necessary?

2016-05-24 Thread Matthew Booth
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Fichter, Dane G. wrote: > Hi John and Matt, > > I actually have a spec and patch up for review addressing some of what > you’re referring to below. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314222/ > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/312210/ >

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-operators][cinder] max_concurrent_builds in Cinder

2016-05-24 Thread Michał Dulko
On 05/24/2016 04:38 PM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > On 23/05, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: >> Hi developers and operators, >> I would like to get any feedback from you about my idea before I'll start >> work on spec. >> >> In Nova, we've got max_concurrent_builds option [1] to set 'Maximum number >> of

Re: [openstack-dev] Plans to converge on one ldap client?

2016-05-24 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Corey Bryant wrote: > Hi All, > > Are there any plans to converge on one ldap client across projects? Some > projects have moved to ldap3 and others are using pyldap (both are in > global requirements). > > The issue we're running

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Dean Troyer
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > > So, just to make sure I'm making myself clear, I believe we should go with > option #2 in Thierry's comment from May 23 11:3 on this[0] review. While > I'm not > entirely opposed to #1 I think #2 is better for us at

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

2016-05-24 Thread Chris Hoge
+1 > On May 23, 2016, at 8:25 PM, Mike Perez wrote: > >> On 18:00 May 20, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> >> I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week Thursday May >> 26th at 1500UTC for one hour on the Import Refactor work [1] ongoing in >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Ben Meyer
On 05/24/2016 11:13 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Flavio Percoco > wrote: > > So, just to make sure I'm making myself clear, I believe we should > go with > option #2 in Thierry's comment from May 23 11:3 on

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] weekly meeting #82

2016-05-24 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Puppeteers! > > We'll have our weekly meeting tomorrow at 3pm UTC on > #openstack-meeting-4. > > Here's a first agenda: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20

Re: [openstack-dev] Plans to converge on one ldap client?

2016-05-24 Thread Corey Bryant
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Corey Bryant > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Are there any plans to converge on one ldap client across projects? Some >> projects have moved to

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] proposing Brian Haley for neutron-stable-maint

2016-05-24 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
> On 17 May 2016, at 13:07, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > > Hi stable-maint-core and all, > > I would like to propose Brian for neutron specific stable team. > > His stats for neutron stable branches are (last 120 days): > > mitaka: 19 reviews; liberty: 68 reviews (3rd place

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][ovo] NeutronDbObject concurrency issues

2016-05-24 Thread John Schwarz
The incorporation of tooz and Neutron is being discussed as part of https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1552680 as an RFE for Newton. Hopefully I'll have some news to break in on this matter in the upcoming days (and if I do I'll update on the launchpad to eliminate duplicity). On Tue, May

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Is verification of images in the image cache necessary?

2016-05-24 Thread Dan Smith
> I like the idea of checking the md5 matches before each boot, as it > mirrors the check we do after downloading from glance. Its possible > thats very unlikely to spot anything that shouldn't already be worried > about by something else. It may just be my love of symmetry that makes > me like

Re: [openstack-dev] [fuel] release version numbers: let's use semvers

2016-05-24 Thread Roman Prykhodchenko
The only thing I would like to mention here is that scripts for making automatic releases on PyPi using OpenStack Infra won’t work, if the version is not formatted according to semver. - romcheg > 24 трав. 2016 р. о 14:34 Igor Kalnitsky написав(ла): > > Hey Zigo, >

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Log spool in the context

2016-05-24 Thread Sean Dague
On 05/24/2016 01:18 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Alexis Lee's message of 2016-05-24 09:34:36 +0100: >> Hi, >> >> I have a spec: https://review.openstack.org/227766 >> and implementation: https://review.openstack.org/316162 >> for adding a spooling logger to oslo.log. Neither is merged

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] usage of ironic-lib

2016-05-24 Thread Loo, Ruby
Thanks for the feedback everyone. Lucas has submitted a patch to ironic-lib¹s README to clarify this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319251/. --ruby On 2016-05-20, 8:46 AM, "Jim Rollenhagen" wrote: >On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 01:21:35PM -0700, Devananda van der Veen

[openstack-dev] [keystone] New Core Reviewer (sent on behalf of Steve Martinelli)

2016-05-24 Thread Morgan Fainberg
I want to welcome Rodrigo Duarte (rodrigods) to the keystone core team. Rodrigo has been a consistent contributor to keystone and has been instrumental in the federation implementations. Over the last cycle he has shown an understanding of the code base and contributed quality reviews. I am super

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Fox, Kevin M
OpenStack is more then the sum of its various pieces. Often features need to cross more then one project. Cross project work is already extremely hard without having to change languages between. Language change should be done very carefully and deliberately. Thanks, Kevin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Is verification of images in the image cache necessary?

2016-05-24 Thread Sean Dague
On 05/24/2016 11:54 AM, Dan Smith wrote: >> I like the idea of checking the md5 matches before each boot, as it >> mirrors the check we do after downloading from glance. Its possible >> thats very unlikely to spot anything that shouldn't already be worried >> about by something else. It may just

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Jay Pipes
On 05/24/2016 06:19 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Chris Dent wrote: [...] I don't really know. I'm firmly in the camp that OpenStack needs to be smaller and more tightly focused if a unitary thing called OpenStack expects to be any good. So I'm curious about and interested in strategies for

[openstack-dev] [kolla][security] Finishing the job on threat analysis for Kolla

2016-05-24 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Rob and Doug, At Summit we had 4 hours of highly productive work producing a list of "things" that can be "threatened". We have about 4 or 5 common patterns where we follow the principle of least privilege. On Friday of Summit we produced a list of all the things (in this case deployed

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova][horizon] Serial console support for ironic instances

2016-05-24 Thread Lucas Alvares Gomes
Hi, > I'm working with Tien who is a submitter of one[1] of console specs. > I joined the console session in Austin. > > In the session, we got the following consensus. > - focus on serial console in Newton > - use nova-serial proxy as is > > We also got some requirements[2] for this feature in

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][stable] proposing Brian Haley for neutron-stable-maint

2016-05-24 Thread Brian Haley
On 05/24/2016 11:17 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: On 17 May 2016, at 13:07, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: Hi stable-maint-core and all, I would like to propose Brian for neutron specific stable team. His stats for neutron stable branches are (last 120 days): mitaka: 19 reviews;

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [infra] resolving issues with Intel NFV CI

2016-05-24 Thread Znoinski, Waldemar
The issue is now resolved. Apparently the job wasn't registered with gearman server as there weren't any slaves available in Jenkins to run it at the time of zuul restart (as some old nodepool nodes were left over and no new VMs were spawned). From: Znoinski, Waldemar

Re: [openstack-dev] Plans to converge on one ldap client?

2016-05-24 Thread Corey Bryant
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Corey Bryant > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Morgan Fainberg < >> morgan.fainb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue,

[openstack-dev] Fwd: keystone federation user story

2016-05-24 Thread Alexander Makarov
Colleagues, here is an actual use case for shadow users assignments, let's discuss possible solutions: all suggestions are appreciated. -- Forwarded message -- From: Andrey Grebennikov Date: Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:43 AM Subject: keystone federation

[openstack-dev] [gate] [nova] live migration, libvirt 1.3, and the gate

2016-05-24 Thread Sean Dague
The team working on live migration testing started with an experimental job on Ubuntu 16.04 to try to be using the latest and greatest libvirt + qemu under the assumption that a set of issues we were seeing are solved. The short answer is, it doesn't look like this is going to work. We run tests

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo_config] Improving Config Option Help Texts

2016-05-24 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Erno Kuvaja Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: May 24, 2016 at 06:06:14 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] [ironic] weekly sub team status report

2016-05-24 Thread Loo, Ruby
Hi, We are rambunctious to present this week's subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. Bugs (dtantsur) === - Stats (diff with 16 May 2016) - Ironic: 192 bugs (+2) + 178 wishlist items (+1). 0 new, 138 in progress

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] I'm going to expire open bug reports older than 18 months.

2016-05-24 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Markus Zoeller's message of 2016-05-24 11:00:35 +0200: > On 24.05.2016 09:34, Duncan Thomas wrote: > > Cinder bugs list was far more manageable once this had been done. > > > > It is worth sharing the tool for this? I realise it's fairly trivial to > > write one, but some

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Log spool in the context

2016-05-24 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Alexis Lee's message of 2016-05-24 09:34:36 +0100: > Hi, > > I have a spec: https://review.openstack.org/227766 > and implementation: https://review.openstack.org/316162 > for adding a spooling logger to oslo.log. Neither is merged yet, reviews > welcome. > > Looking at how I'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

2016-05-24 Thread Brian Rosmaita
+1 On 5/24/16, 11:11 AM, "Chris Hoge" wrote: >+1 > >> On May 23, 2016, at 8:25 PM, Mike Perez wrote: >> >>> On 18:00 May 20, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >>> Hello all, >>> >>> >>> I want to propose having a dedicated virtual sync next week Thursday >>>May

[openstack-dev] Summit evolution online town halls

2016-05-24 Thread Jonathan Bryce
Hi everyone, You might have seen the FAQ we posted last week about the continuing work on evolving the format and structure of the Summits: http://www.openstack.org/blog/2016/05/faq-evolving-the-openstack-design-summit/ I wanted to send a reminder note out to highlight that Thierry and I

Re: [openstack-dev] Plans to converge on one ldap client?

2016-05-24 Thread Morgan Fainberg
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Corey Bryant wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Morgan Fainberg < > morgan.fainb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Corey Bryant > > wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>>

[openstack-dev] Fw: [glance] [defcore] [interop] Proposal for a virtual sync dedicated to Import Refactor May 26th

2016-05-24 Thread Catherine Cuong Diep
+1 - Catheine Diep - Forwarded by Catherine Cuong Diep/San Jose/IBM on 05/24/2016 10:31 AM - From: Brian Rosmaita To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: 05/24/2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-24 Thread Ian Cordasco
-Original Message- From: Joshua Harlow Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Date: May 23, 2016 at 15:23:32 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Log spool in the context

2016-05-24 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2016-05-24 14:16:13 -0400: > On 05/24/2016 01:18 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Alexis Lee's message of 2016-05-24 09:34:36 +0100: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I have a spec: https://review.openstack.org/227766 > >> and implementation:

  1   2   >