I'd like to open the proverbial floor for feedback regarding a problem I'm
trying to tackle. It concerns Heat's assignment of stack resource UUIDs prior
to a stack's instantiation. (Note that this is not the same as physical UUIDs
assigned by Nova, Cinder, et. al; one ID is
> On 30 Aug 2016, at 12:42, Paul Bourke wrote:
>
> Do people feel we still want to require a bug-id in the commit message for
> features, when reno notes are present? My understanding is that till now
> we've required people to add bugs for non trivial features in order
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:10:47PM +0200, Jiří Stránský wrote:
>>
>> On 30.8.2016 10:17, Steven Hardy wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Yeah, that gets us closer, but we do need to handle more than one value
>> > (list entry) per key,
>> I don't think it's all that ambitious to think we can just use
>> tried and tested schema evolution techniques that work for everyone
>> else.
>
> People have been asking me for over a year how to do this, and I have
> no easy answer, I'm glad that you do. I would like to see some
> examples
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 07:53:07PM +0530, Babu Shanmugam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The THT patch for OVN [1] has no more dependencies with the recent merging
> of [2]. The changes in heat templates does not have any impact on the
> existing templates as major of the changes are in new templates and will
All,
I wanted to follow up on the e-mail thread [1] on Cloning support in the
NFS driver. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the plan for the
NFS driver going forward as I see it.
First, I am aware that the driver has gone quite some time without care
and feeding. For a number of
The ironic node-list --chassis seems to be easier to understand for me.
I've commented on one of the patches that maybe we should deprecate the
chassis-node-list if we add this, but then, the deprecation is slow, we
have some functional tests already... Having two commands kind of reflects
the
- Mail original -
> De: "Andrew Laski"
> À: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> Envoyé: Mardi 30 Août 2016 15:03:35
> Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively
> distributed][architecture]Coordination between actions/WGs
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016, at 05:36 AM,
Hi,
The THT patch for OVN [1] has no more dependencies with the recent
merging of [2]. The changes in heat templates does not have any impact
on the existing templates as major of the changes are in new templates
and will be used only when OVN is enabled.
It would be nice to have OVN
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:10:47PM +0200, Jiří Stránský wrote:
>
> On 30.8.2016 10:17, Steven Hardy wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yeah, that gets us closer, but we do need to handle more than one value
> > (list entry) per key, e.g:
> >
> > data:
> >l:
> > -
Ben,
Thank you very much for the history on the driver here. This was all
news to me. It helps me to understand why cloning was listed as
supported but was no longer implemented. Also explains why the simpler
'cp' based solution hasn't been implemented. I was wondering why that
hadn't
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2016-08-26 11:50:24 -0400:
>
> On 08/25/2016 01:13 PM, Steve Martinelli wrote:
> > The keystone team is pursuing a trigger-based approach to support
> > rolling, zero-downtime upgrades. The proposed operator experience is
> > documented here:
> >
> >
On 30.8.2016 10:17, Steven Hardy wrote:
Yeah, that gets us closer, but we do need to handle more than one value
(list entry) per key, e.g:
data:
l:
- "gnocchi_metricd_node_names": ["a0", "a1", "a2"]
"tripleo_packages_node_names": ["a0", "a1",
expression: $.data.l.reduce($1.mergeWith($2))
Or maybe it's better with seed value for reduce, just in case:
$.data.l.reduce($1.mergeWith($2), {})
Jirka
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
No topic this week, meeting cancelled!
See you next week :)
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If you have any topic to add for this week, please use the etherpad:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekl
Hi fellow kuryrs!
This email is gonna be a bit long, so I'll put it in parts.
Kubernetes integration components
==
As you know, we are now in the process of upstreaming the Kuryr Kubernetes
PoC that the Kuryr team at Midokura did. This PoC upstreaming effort has
two main
We are high-spirited to announce the release of:
os-client-config 1.21.0: OpenStack Client Configuation Library
This release is part of the newton release series.
With source available at:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-client-config
With package available at:
Hi Yujun,
From: Yujun Zhang
Date: Monday, 29 August 2016 at 11:59
entities:
- type: switch
name: switch-1
id: switch-1 # should be same as name
state: available
relationships:
- type: nova.host
name: host-1
id: host-1 # should be same as name
is_source:
Hi,
Have you received my previous email ?
Regards,
On 15 August 2016 at 13:39, Alioune wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm trying to launch Openstack SFC as explained in[1] by creating 2 SFs, 1
> Web Server (DST) and the DHCP namespace as the SRC.
> I've installed OVS (Open vSwitch)
On 30.8.2016 18:16, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 30/08/16 12:02, Steven Hardy wrote:
debug_tripleo2:
value:
yaql:
expression: $.data.l.reduce($1.mergeWith($2))
data:
l:
- "gnocchi_metricd_node_names": ["overcloud-controller-0",
I’m happy to allow this personally, but wanted to get others input and give
people the chance to object.
My reasoning for allowing this:
- It’s high level, doesn’t affect any base horizon lib features.
- It is mature code, has multiple patch sets and a +2
I’ll give it a few days to allow others
>> Even in the case of projects using versioned objects, it still
>> means a SQL layer has to include functionality for both versions of
>> a particular schema change which itself is awkward.
That's not true. Nova doesn't have multiple models to straddle a
particular change. We just...
> It's
On 8/29/2016 2:40 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
I've been out for a week and not very involved in the resource providers
work, but after talking about the various changes up in the air at the
moment a bunch of us thought it would be helpful to lay out next steps
for the work we want to get done this
Together with Keith we're working on some patches to integrate (via
puppet-ceph) the deployment of Ceph RGW in TripleO as a composable
service which can optionally replace SwiftProxy
Changes are tracked via blueprint at:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/ceph-rgw-integration
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016, at 09:55 AM, lebre.adr...@free.fr wrote:
>
>
> - Mail original -
> > De: "Andrew Laski"
> > À: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> > Envoyé: Mardi 30 Août 2016 15:03:35
> > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][massively
> >
Ben has proposed[1] adding manila, manila-ui and python-manilaclient
to the list of deliverables whose vulnerability reports and
advisories are overseen by the OpenStack Vulnerability Management
Team. This proposal is an assertion that the requirements[2] for the
vulnerability:managed governance
On 30.8.2016 18:02, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 04:10:47PM +0200, Jiří Stránský wrote:
On 30.8.2016 10:17, Steven Hardy wrote:
Yeah, that gets us closer, but we do need to handle more than one value
(list entry) per key, e.g:
data:
l:
-
On 30/08/16 12:02, Steven Hardy wrote:
debug_tripleo2:
value:
yaql:
expression: $.data.l.reduce($1.mergeWith($2))
data:
l:
- "gnocchi_metricd_node_names": ["overcloud-controller-0",
"overcloud-controller-1",
Hey everyone - I have a little bit of a UX request for our API developers.
For the last week or so, I've been working on building version negotiation
logic for an OpenStack SDK. The process is pretty simple:
1- Read clouds.yaml for the keystone URL.
2- Query keystone for the service catalog.
3-
We are delighted to announce the release of:
os_vif 1.2.0: A library for plugging and unplugging virtual interfaces
in OpenStack.
This release is part of the newton release series.
With package available at:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/os_vif
For more details, please see below.
Changes
Hi Alioune,
It is weird that when you create a port chain, you get a “chain delete failed”
error message.
We never had this problem. Chain deletion is only involved when you do “delete
chain” or “update chain”.
Not sure which networking code file combination you are using or whether it is
Sorry for the late notice, but we decided we'd rather keep working on
Newton things this week instead of having this meeting, so it's
cancelled for today.
// jim
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
This was sent earlier in the day. Please note the final request for
schedule sent: FB: 2, WR: 2, CM: 1
Also, a request was made to have all Glance sessions on same day for the
convenience of the audience willing to show up (be in the same
place/floor/etc.) and request for the contributors'
Hi all oslo (and others),
Just to make sure that everyone is aware, we have a summit soon in
barcelona (ha); hopefully that's not news to many, the bigger news
though is that we (the oslo folks) need to decide on how many fishbowls
and working rooms we would like to get.
I've brought this
The bug id and blueprint id are for automatic tracking via Launchpad. If they
are omitted, managing the release becomes especially difficult. Unfortunately
launchpad doesn't know about reno because then I'd agree, that would be an
optimal way too go.
Regards
-steve
On 8/30/16, 3:42 AM,
On 08/30/2016 09:57 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
As someone else brought up, this is an unnecessarily bleak view of how database
migrations work.
We aren't talking about database migrations. We are talking about
*online* database migrations, where we would like both the *old* and
*new*
Sounds good Josh
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
> Hi all oslo (and others),
>
> Just to make sure that everyone is aware, we have a summit soon in barcelona
> (ha); hopefully that's not news to many, the bigger news though is that we
> (the oslo
Here's my 2 cents:
The patch in puppet-ceph has been here for long time now and it still
doesn't work (recent update of today, puppet-ceph is not idempotent
when deploying RGW service. It must be fixed in order to get
successful deployment).
Puppet CI is still not gating on Ceph RGW (scenario004
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 07:18:26PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:04:15AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> >> As a reminder, here's what we had for Austin:
> >> Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu): 2
> >>
FYI: we’re in the process of doing almost that =)
Here is a link for yaql doc commits
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/yaql+branch:master+topic:yaqldocs
We plan to have it finished and published in time for N release and Barcelona =)
--
Kirill Zaitsev
Murano
On 08/30/2016 04:43 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Correct, it is harder for development. Since the database server has all
of the potential for the worst problems, being a stateful service, then
I believe moving complexity _out_ of it, is generally an operational
win, at the expense of some
Hey folks,
The deadline for milestone #3 is August 31st (this is when we are tagging
milestone #3). We then have until September 15th to stabilize the release and
tag rc1. The release team branches occata at rc1, so if a feature doesn’t make
rc1, its not making newton. After rc1, any
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2016-08-30 14:56:15 -0400:
>
> On 08/30/2016 09:57 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >>
> >
> > As someone else brought up, this is an unnecessarily bleak view of how
> > database
> > migrations work.
>
> We aren't talking about database migrations. We are talking
As a gentle and peaceful reminder, please make auto triage when filing
a bug and keep track on it.
- Set priority level, set it to triaged if you set a milestone.
- Assign the bug to yourself if you work on it.
- Set it to Fix released when your patch is merged and automation
didn't update
On 30/08/16 12:18, Jiří Stránský wrote:
Hmm yea that's strange, because YAQL has a test case for reduce() with 5
items:
https://github.com/openstack/yaql/blob/f71a0305089997cbfa5ff00f660920711b04f39e/yaql/tests/test_queries.py#L337-L339
If YAQL people are reading this, I suggest you should
Sorry for being slow on this one, I've been pulled into some internal
things at work.
So... Talking to Matt Riedemann just now, it seems like we should continue
to pass through the user authentication details when we have them to the
plugin. The problem is what to do in the case where we do not
On 8/30/2016 4:36 PM, Michael Still wrote:
Sorry for being slow on this one, I've been pulled into some internal
things at work.
So... Talking to Matt Riedemann just now, it seems like we should
continue to pass through the user authentication details when we have
them to the plugin. The
There is a bug in how yaql interprets its 3rd argument (aggregator). It was
supposed to be a function to aggregate values within each group but instead
was applied to the outcome of groupBy. I submitted a fix for this:
https://review.openstack.org/363191. Though I'm not sure we can release new
We are tickled pink to announce the release of:
os-win 1.2.0: Windows / Hyper-V library for OpenStack projects.
This release is part of the newton stable release series.
With source available at:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/os-win
With package available at:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 03:25:30PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Here's my 2 cents:
>
> The patch in puppet-ceph has been here for long time now and it still
> doesn't work (recent update of today, puppet-ceph is not idempotent
> when deploying RGW service. It must be fixed in order to get
>
Yeah, no meeting again, same reason :/
--
Regards, Markus Zoeller (markus_z)
On 23.08.2016 14:21, Markus Zoeller wrote:
> I get dragged into some internal stuff recently and didn't have time to
> prepare anything or host the meeting.
>
> One noteworthy thing though, please tag any bug report,
What is the problem you are running into with mock_sync?
Elisha
From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 5:09 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] relationship_type in
Excerpts from Mike Bayer's message of 2016-08-30 18:15:14 -0400:
>
> On 08/30/2016 04:43 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Correct, it is harder for development. Since the database server has all
> > of the potential for the worst problems, being a stateful service, then
> > I believe moving
Since the encrypted credential work is currently based on triggers, I spent
most of today documenting a walk-though migration from Mitaka to Newton
[0]. Regardless of the outcome discussed here - figured it would be worth
sharing since it's relevant to the thread. Most of the gist contains stuff
On 8/30/2016 10:50 AM, Jay S. Bryant wrote:
All,
I wanted to follow up on the e-mail thread [1] on Cloning support in the
NFS driver. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the plan for the
NFS driver going forward as I see it.
First, I am aware that the driver has gone quite some time
Hi all,
I'd just like to add a point to Doug's email.
Along with this being the Final release for client libraries freeze its also
the requirements freeze.
That means that on Thursday Sept 1st (UTC) we'll add a procedural -2 to all
open changes in the master branch of openstack/requirements.
On 08/30/2016 08:04 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
My direct experience with this was MySQL 5.0 and 5.1. They worked as
documented, and no I don't think they've changed much since then.
When they were actually installed into the schema and up to date with
the code that expected them, and the
Cells is a good enhancement for Nova scalability, but there are some issues in
deployment Cells for massively distributed edge clouds:
1) using RPC for inter-data center communication will bring the difficulty in
inter-dc troubleshooting and maintenance, and some critical issue in operation.
Hi,
The stable/newton has been cut and respective commits have merged for
both store and client [1]. Please feel free to merge any commits on
master that were pending however, note that we won't be releasing any
libraries out until R-0 when the freeze on libraries stops.
Let me know if there are
Hi,
We have weekly Nova API meeting today. The meeting is being held Wednesday
UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4.
The proposed agenda and meeting details are here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI
Please feel free to add items to the agenda.
Thanks
joehuang wrote:
Cells is a good enhancement for Nova scalability, but there are some issues in
deployment Cells for massively distributed edge clouds:
1) using RPC for inter-data center communication will bring the difficulty in
inter-dc troubleshooting and maintenance, and some critical
Dear all
Sorry my lack of reactivity, I 've been out for the few last days.
According to the different replies, I think we should enlarge the discussion
and not stay on the vCPE use-case, which is clearly specific and represents
only one use-case among the ones we would like to study. For
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016, at 05:36 AM, lebre.adr...@free.fr wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Sorry my lack of reactivity, I 've been out for the few last days.
>
> According to the different replies, I think we should enlarge the
> discussion and not stay on the vCPE use-case, which is clearly specific
>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 10:20:00AM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> Bare metal provisioning is a hot topic right now. These services are also
> required for Dan's heat-driven undercloud work. The majority of changes has
> landed already, but there a few changes waiting on puppet-ironic
Hi fellow kuryrs!
There is a proposal for dropping the 'common' openstack/kuryr-libnetwork
package and move its pieces in the parent kuryr_libnetwork package [1].
The idea behind 'common' was that it would serve the current purpose
developed by the openstack/kuryr repository, i.e., to serve as a
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>>> > Hi
We are happy to announce the release of:
virtualbmc 0.1.0: Create virtual BMCs for controlling virtual
instances via IPMI
This is the first release of virtualbmc.
For more details, please see below.
Changes in virtualbmc d10b57d95acd35e47f51aba1fe9a98ccf0de08d3..0.1.0
Bandit versions lower than 1.1.0 do not escape HTML in issue reports
---
### Summary ###
Bandit versions lower than 1.1.0 have a bug in the HTML report formatter
that does not escape HTML in issue context snippets. This could lead to
an XSS if HTML reports are hosted as part of a CI pipeline.
On 30 August 2016 at 11:42, Paul Bourke wrote:
> Kolla,
>
> Do people feel we still want to require a bug-id in the commit message for
> features, when reno notes are present? My understanding is that till now
> we've required people to add bugs for non trivial features
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Matt Riedemann wrote:
2. Chris is going to cleanup the devstack change that adds the placement
service:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342362/
The main issue is there isn't a separate placement database, at least not by
default, so Chris has to take that into account.
lebre.adr...@free.fr wrote:
> [...]
> According to the different replies, I think we should enlarge the discussion
> and not stay on the vCPE use-case, which is clearly specific and represents
> only one use-case among the ones we would like to study. For instance we are
> in touch with NRENs
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:03:27PM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 07:07:09AM +0200, Thomas Herve wrote:
> >> dict($.groupBy($.keys().toList()[0], $.values().toList()[0][0]))
> >>
> >> ought to work,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Sean McGinnis
wrote:
> python-cinderclient this week. It just doesn't have enough activity to
> have needed a release any earlier
>
+1 to Sean on it. All features were merged last few weeks and it sounds
good to get it released both with
Yes. Please add it to the file
/workspace/dev/vitrage/vitrage/tests/resources/mock_configurations/driver/driver_switch_snapshot_dynamic.json
under the "relationships" section, just like in your commit.
If you need help understanding how to work with the mock_sync, let me know.
Elisha
From:
Hi,
In Kolla, we are having an issue with Nova's VNC / SPICE address and live
migration. Currently, we are declaring the IP address for vncserver_listen
on each node (via ansible). However, when a live migration is performed,
it fails due to this address not being available.
The hack is to
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:32:09PM +0200, Christian Schwede wrote:
> Hello,
>
> kindly asking for a FFE for a required setting to improve Swift-based
> TripleO deployments:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/358643/
This looks like it's associated with a bug, and if it's a bugfix then no
FFE
Kolla,
Do people feel we still want to require a bug-id in the commit message
for features, when reno notes are present? My understanding is that till
now we've required people to add bugs for non trivial features in order
to track them as part of releases. Does/should reno supersede this?
Hi all!
Bare metal provisioning is a hot topic right now. These services are
also required for Dan's heat-driven undercloud work. The majority of
changes has landed already, but there a few changes waiting on
puppet-ironic changes.
The feature is low-impact as it's disabled by default and
On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 14:11 +0400, Fawaz Mohammed wrote:
> Have you enabled huge page on the host level?
> Do you have enough vn.nr_hugepages?
> As per your requirements, you need a host with 512 hugepage (1G/2M).
> Check your host's /etc/sysctl.conf file and see vm.nr_hugepages
> value.
As a
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila
Dear all,
Thanks all for the reply, I have read the etherpad note and there seems no
working BP/SPEC now.
So I have updated one BP/SPEC from my colleague put up for Mitaka with
microversion implementation for Ocata release:
BP:
I added a new key 'is_source' to static physical configuration [1] and the
test currently fails.
Not sure we need to update mock_sync or not.
[1]
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/362525/1/vitrage/tests/resources/static_datasources/switch_to_host_datasource.yaml
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM
Colleagues,
An interesting discussion, the only question appears to be whether vCPE is
a suitable use case as the others do appear to be cloud use cases. Lots of
people assume CPE == small residential devices however CPE covers a broad
spectrum of appliances. Some of our customers' premises are
My purpose is to inspect an **existing** openstack environment with vitrage.
Do I have to install vitrage on the target environment or it can be done by
proper configuration?
--
Yujun
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 06:32:16AM +0100, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm still working on getting all pieces together for the Manila CephFS
> > driver integration and realizing that we have about a week of busy
On 25/08/16 13:13 -0400, Steve Martinelli wrote:
The keystone team is pursuing a trigger-based approach to support rolling,
zero-downtime upgrades. The proposed operator experience is documented here:
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/keystone/upgrading.html
This differs from Nova and
Dave,
Thanks for pointing this out, looks like it is a regression in nova introduced
during Newton cycle. At some point we moved checks of graphic and serial
consoles to the live migration pre-checks on source node, but we never moved
piece of code that populates this data while executing
87 matches
Mail list logo