Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 04/10/2017 10:23 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: 2017-04-10 23:19 GMT+09:00 Dean Troyer : On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Unknown provider resource-type-registry.service test error

Hi all, Thanks very much in advance for any help you are able to offer. I have been working on developing the QoS Policies panel for horizon and have the panel working, however I am struggling with the qos.service.spec.js file. In advance of going into my findings and issues so far, the

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 04/10/2017 11:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/10/2017 9:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki >> wrote: >>> (question not directly related to this topic) >>> I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 04/10/2017 09:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for network management and newer API versions for other compute

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] is it ok to create extra users with sudo permissions during devstack run

Clark, thanks for reply. On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017, at 08:31 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > > Hi infra team, > > > > on order to test a piece of functionality I am developing, during the > > devstack plugin run I need

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 04/10/2017 10:24 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 04/10/2017 11:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 4/10/2017 9:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?

Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-04-11 00:09:10 +0900: > Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), > > As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for > neutron stadium projects? > There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying > to add dashboard

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 4/10/2017 9:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for network management and newer API versions for other compute

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

Looks like " Swift cluster level metrics and analytics" is also scheduled twice. Thiago > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: > On 10/04/17 22:19, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Flavio Percoco >> wrote: >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 4:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think > you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing > proposed changes and pushing your own) ? If there was ONE thing, one >

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

On 4/10/2017 4:35 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please check yours. Please also find attached in PDF the proposed schedule for the Forum in Boston.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 04/10/2017 10:37 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/10/2017 09:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for network management

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][manila] Ganesha deployment

I'm not really an expert on composable roles so I'll leave that to someone else, but see my thoughts inline on the networking aspect. On 04/10/2017 03:22 AM, Jan Provaznik wrote: 2) define a new VIP (for IP failover) and 2 networks for NfsStorage role: a) a frontend network between users

[openstack-dev] [HA] HA Discussion at Boston Forum

Hi All, I proposed a session [1] to Boston Forum and it is now at incomplete state. This is good opportunity for all of us to get together and discuss our HA related issues. I need your help to reform this session. Please put comments on [1] or replay to this with your comments. [1]

[openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Meeting Reminder

Hello! Just wanted to remind everyone of our meeting today at 20:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 Please feel free to add items to the agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-upstream-institute-meetings Also, please take a look at the slides so we can focus on improvements rather than

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-04-10 23:19 GMT+09:00 Dean Troyer : > On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: >> (question not directly related to this topic) >> I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for >> network management >> and newer API

[openstack-dev] [infra] is it ok to create extra users with sudo permissions during devstack run

Hi infra team, on order to test a piece of functionality I am developing, during the devstack plugin run I need to create an extra user with password-less sudo permissions. As I am not sure of intricacies of our infra setup, I'd like to clarify if it is acceptable. TL;DR There is

[openstack-dev] [puppet] Meeting April 11, 2017 @1500 UTC

Just a reminder, we have a meeting scheduled tomorrow April 11, 2017 @1500UTC[0]. Please add something to the agenda[1] if you have something you would like to talk about. Thanks, -Alex [0] https://docs.openstack.org/developer/puppet-openstack-guide/meetings.html [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] is it ok to create extra users with sudo permissions during devstack run

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017, at 08:31 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > Hi infra team, > > on order to test a piece of functionality I am developing, during the > devstack plugin run I need to create an extra user with password-less > sudo > permissions. As I am not sure of intricacies of our infra

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Hi, I am well aware that being on the TC is a serious time commitment and that there is more to do than a given day has hours. So I read your question more about prioritizing and how I would do that. A fair part of how I prioritize depends on input from others. That’s why I said listening to

[openstack-dev] [ironic] this week's priorities and subteam reports

Hi, We are pleased to present this week's priorities and subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted. This Week's Priorities (as of the weekly ironic meeting) 1. rolling

Re: [openstack-dev] Ocata - Ubuntu 16.04 - OVN does not work with DPDK

On 8 April 2017 at 00:37, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote: > Guys, > > I manage to deploy Ocata on Ubuntu 16.04 with OVN for the first time > ever, today! > > It looks very, very good... OVN L3 Router is working, OVN DHCP working... > bridge mappings "br-ex" on each compute

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Apr 10, 2017, at 4:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think > you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing > proposed changes and pushing your own) ? Well, as you know I have been

[openstack-dev] UC Meeting 04/10/17 Cancelled

Hey everyone, Apologies for the late notice. We are cancelling the meeting today. We have moved to a weekly cadence with meetings being subject to new agenda items having to be proposed/added by the Friday before the meeting. In other words, for UC meeting scheduled for 04/17/17 agenda items will

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][cinder] critical fix for ceph job

* Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/7/2017 9:43 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Ghanshyam Mann > > wrote: > > > > Thanks. I am not sure these kind of driver specific behavior on

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > How will the TC grow a diverse membership if it's not even held, at least > every other week, in a timezone where the other half of the world can > attend? This is something we do need to sort out. The experiences I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On 4/10/2017 1:18 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Thierry Carrez wrote: So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing proposed changes and pushing your own) ? I've been regularly

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > How long are we expected to be carrying this deprecated bridge code? If you > need these CLIs/API bindings in the client, then don't upgrade to 8.0.0, or > run different versions of novaclient in venvs or containers if

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 4/10/2017 1:51 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: How long are we expected to be carrying this deprecated bridge code? If you need these CLIs/API bindings in the client, then don't upgrade to 8.0.0, or run different versions

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 4/10/2017 11:14 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/10/2017 10:37 AM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/10/2017 09:19 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: (question not directly related to this topic) I am not sure there is a case where users

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] FW: [quotas] Unified Limits Conceptual Spec RFC

Sending out a heads up that the initial spec [0] merged. [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/440815/ On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Tim Bell wrote: > > For those that are interested in nested quotas, there is proposal on how > to address this forming in openstack-dev (and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Matt, I second this request. At least one person i talked to, pointed this as a primary reason for not standing for the TC election. Thanks, Dims On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 4/10/2017 1:18 PM, Chris Dent wrote: >> >> On Mon, 10 Apr 2017,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > How will the TC grow a diverse membership if it's not even held, at least > every other week, in a timezone where the other half of the world can attend? +1 --

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On 04/10/2017 01:52 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 4/10/2017 1:18 PM, Chris Dent wrote: On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Thierry Carrez wrote: So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing proposed changes and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On 4/10/2017 2:55 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: The TC meetings are held in IRC and that may somewhat mitigate the issue for non-native English speakers, but I've had problems myself keeping up at times with the flurry of comments. In any case, I think it would be good to include language in the pile

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Agreed but not only for the TC. I also heard privately from some contributors that meetings times prevent them from fully engage with a project. This is something where we as the TC can lead by example. German On 4/10/17, 3:06 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" wrote: Matt,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Thierry Carrez wrote: So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing proposed changes and pushing your own) ? I've been regularly reviewing changes in the governance repo and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Matt Riedemann wrote: This might also tie back in with what cdent was mentioning, and if the flurry of conversation during a TC meeting throws people off, maybe the minutes should be digested after the meeting in the mailing list. I know the meeting is logged, but it can

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mriede...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 4:41 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority > > On 4/10/2017 2:55 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?

I think 'a' is probably the way to go since we can mainly rely on existing horizon guides for creating new dashboard repos. On Apr 10, 2017 08:11, "Akihiro Motoki" wrote: > Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), > > As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

> When there are topics with a lot of people clamoring to talk, Thierry usually > lets people speak in order of "raising > their hand". This reduces cross-talk and lets everyone get their turn to > state what's on their mind. +1, impressive for the "raising their hand" in TC weekly IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

On 10/04/17 05:19 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > There was no stable team meeting today but according to the release > schedule page [1], Mitaka EOL happens after today. So what's the plan? > Same old song and dance as always? > i abandoned all the stable/mitaka items in Telemetry projects.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Howdy, To answer the original question, if elected, I should be able to commit at least a few hours per day to the TC (if not more). I can also be quite elastic in this being able to spend more time some weeks than others as the role dictates. My timezone is UTC+10 which makes the meetings at

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

Yes, please cancel. I don't even see at this point a need for a separate program for the effort. It was applicable before when we dealt with stable gates on daily basis, but it's no longer the case. Ihar On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:19 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > There was no

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] How to get all detail RPC message and detail context in neutron docs?

I would strongly recommend that you don't build anything based on these messages. The contents change from release to release since this is an internal API between the agents and the server. On Apr 6, 2017 00:48, "Sam" wrote: > Thank you, use debug option will also help us

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Apr 10, 2017, at 3:40 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > I don't attend many TC meetings, it's usually on accident, but yeah, when I > do I always note the flurry of cross-talk chatter that just drowns everything > out. I feel like there are usually at least 3 parallel

[openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

There was no stable team meeting today but according to the release schedule page [1], Mitaka EOL happens after today. So what's the plan? Same old song and dance as always? Also, while I'm here, should the stable team meeting be cancelled? There hasn't been a meeting in a month [2]. Should

Re: [openstack-dev] [stable] What's the plan for mitaka-eol?

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 04:19:00PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > There was no stable team meeting today but according to the release schedule > page [1], Mitaka EOL happens after today. So what's the plan? Same old song > and dance as always? Yup. I'm generating the list of EOL'able repos

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Suggestion required on pci_device inventory addition to ironic and its subsequent changes in nova

Hi team, Please could you pour in your suggestions on the mail? I raised a blueprint in Nova for this https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/pci-passthorugh-for-ironic and two RFEs at ironic side https://bugs.launchpad.net/ironic/+bug/1680780 and

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] another i18n proposal for heat templates 'description' help strings

Hi,   In TripleO UI project users requested translation of the web UI. But some web UI strings are displayed from heat template files in tripleo- heat-templates project.   In order to get translated templates displayed in tripleo-ui, we propose another solution as follows, which needs to change

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][kolla] extended start and hostpath persistent dirs

Dan, Martin, Jiri, and all folks, how could we make a final call for this please? The decision impacts code review for new patches, like redis [0] or etcd [1] [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442151/ [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447627/ As I see (suggest) it: On 04.04.2017 22:53,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] allow_instance_snapshots config option is not used consistently

On 10 April 2017 at 01:56, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I found a fun little legacy nugget of compute API non-interoperability joy > tonight. > > The "allow_instance_snapshots" config option disables the createImage server > action API. Completely config driven and therefore not

[openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Hi everyone, New in this TC election round, we have a few days between nominations and actual voting to ask questions and get to know the candidates a bit better. I'd like to kick off this new "campaigning period" with a basic question on available time and top priority. All the candidates are

[openstack-dev] [nova] notification update week 14

Hi, Here is the status update / focus setting mail about notification work for week 14. Bugs [Medium] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1657428 The instance notifications are sent with inconsistent timestamp format. Fix seems abandoned by the original author so I will update it soon to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Suggestion required on pci_device inventory addition to ironic and its subsequent changes in nova

On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 11:50 +0530, Nisha Agarwal wrote: > Hi team, > > Please could you pour in your suggestions on the mail? > > I raised a blueprint in Nova for this https://blueprints.launchpad.ne > t/nova/+spec/pci-passthorugh-for-ironic and two RFEs at ironic side h >

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][docker] registry-1.docker.io to reverse proxy cache

On 08/04/17 10:44 -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 12:15:49PM -0400, Paul Belanger wrote: Greetings, In an effort to help projects depending on docker infrastructure, we've setup a reverse proxy cache for http://registry-1.docker.io. Please see the instructions in 453811[1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

Thierry, Team, On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Hi everyone, > > New in this TC election round, we have a few days between nominations > and actual voting to ask questions and get to know the candidates a bit > better. I'd like to kick off this new

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Weekly IRC meeting today April 10th is cancelled

Hi Kuryrs, I'm on PTO on the mountains with limited connectivity, hence I won't be able to make it to the weekly IRC meeting. Regards and sorry for the short notice, Toni __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

[openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please check yours. Please also find attached in PDF the proposed schedule for the Forum in Boston. Let us know if you see major issues

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Tags for volumes

We have an user demand that volumes should be filtered by some operation with metadata(or tag): 1. key1=value1 2. key1=value1 and key2=value2 3. key1=value1 or key1=value2 4. key1=value1 or key2=value2 5. not key1=value1 6. not key1=value1 and not key1=value2 7. not key1=value1 and not key2=value2

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] allow_instance_snapshots config option is not used consistently

On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 10:24 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: > On 10 April 2017 at 01:56, Matt Riedemann > wrote: > > I found a fun little legacy nugget of compute API non- > > interoperability joy > > tonight. > > > > The "allow_instance_snapshots" config option disables the > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

On 10/04/17 17:35 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please check yours. Please also find attached in PDF the proposed schedule for the Forum in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On 10/04/17 11:16 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, New in this TC election round, we have a few days between nominations and actual voting to ask questions and get to know the candidates a bit better. I'd like to kick off this new "campaigning period" with a basic question on available

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] allow_instance_snapshots config option is not used consistently

On 4/10/2017 5:20 AM, sfinu...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 10:24 +0100, John Garbutt wrote: On 10 April 2017 at 01:56, Matt Riedemann wrote: I found a fun little legacy nugget of compute API non- interoperability joy tonight. The "allow_instance_snapshots"

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova] Suggestion required on pci_device inventory addition to ironic and its subsequent changes in nova

On 10 April 2017 at 11:31, wrote: > On Mon, 2017-04-10 at 11:50 +0530, Nisha Agarwal wrote: >> Hi team, >> >> Please could you pour in your suggestions on the mail? >> >> I raised a blueprint in Nova for this https://blueprints.launchpad.ne >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Tags for volumes

You can deploy Searchlight (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Searchlight) and it can handle this and more complex metadata querying (it is backed by elastic search and supports all of the expressive power of elastic search queries). There's a limit to how much query functionality can go into a

[openstack-dev] Reminder User Committee Meeting

Hey everyone, User Committee will meet today in #openstack-meeting @ 1900UTC. If you have any requests for agenda items you can reply to this email or message any of the UC members via email as well as IRC - #openstack-uc -- Kind regards, OpenStack UC

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][kolla] extended start and hostpath persistent dirs

Responses inline :) I started snipping parts out because the quotations are getting long. tl;dr use kolla images and bootsrap OR upstream images with direct commands: .. code-block:: yaml kolla_config: /var/lib/kolla/config_files/foo.json command: /usr/bin/foo We insist on using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Token expiration]

The token itself is still expired, regardless of where it's persisted, if at all. Expired tokens are only considered valid when presented as an X-Auth-Token to keystonemiddleware.auth_token along with a valid X-Service-Token, or when validating an X-Subject-Token against keystone directly using

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

> -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 5:17 AM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > Subject: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority > > Hi everyone, > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

2017-03-29 5:06 GMT+09:00 Matt Riedemann : > On 3/28/2017 9:04 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to raise a topic when horizon nova-network support can be >> dropped. >> I added [tc] tag as it is related to >> "assert:follows-standard-deprecation" tag in

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

Are the three rooms roughly the same size? On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 3:35 AM, Tom Fifield wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We > have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please > check

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

David Medberry wrote: > Are the three rooms roughly the same size? 102 and 103 are slightly larger than 104. Cheers, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 10/04/17 17:35 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We >> have updated the topic submission site with the status of each - please >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > (question not directly related to this topic) > I am not sure there is a case where users still use API 2.36 for > network management > and newer API versions for other compute operation. This is probably true for

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

I am okay to drop nova-network feature in Pike. More generally, can we horizon team say the following? A feature deprecated in a back-end project is automatically deprecated in Horizon and a feature in horizon will be dropped if a corresponding support is dropped in a back-end project and/or

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][manila] Ganesha deployment

Hi, TripleO currently supports deploying CephFS and it can be used as a backend for Manila service, so user can mount ceph shares by using either ceph kernel driver or ceph-fuse on his side. There is an ongoing ganesha-nfs project [1] which can be used as a proxy when accessing CephFS. The

[openstack-dev] [mistral] Team meeting - 04/10/2017

Hi, I’d like to invite Mistral team members to our weekly team meeting today at #openstack-meeting-3 at 15.00 UTC. Agenda: • Review action items • Current status (progress, issues, roadblocks, further plans) • Sync on Pike 1 progress • Setting up project goals for 2017 • Open discussion

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On 10 April 2017 at 10:16, Thierry Carrez wrote: > All the candidates are top community members with a lot of > responsibilities on their shoulders already. My experience tells me that > it is easy to overestimate the time we can dedicate to Technical > Committee matters,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:16:57AM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > So my question is the following: if elected, how much time do you think > you'll be able to dedicate to Technical Committee affairs (reviewing > proposed changes and pushing your own) ? Starting today, I've moved from a position

[openstack-dev] [Blazar] new instance reservation overview

Hi Blazar folks, I drafted overview of new instance reservation [1]. It contains motivation and basic idea of the reservation, short-term goal and long-term goal. It's just a draft and entry points for the discussion. We would also discuss some reservations things based on the etherpad

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] [elections] Available time and top priority

On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 03:40:30PM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > I don't attend many TC meetings, it's usually on accident, but yeah, when I > do I always note the flurry of cross-talk chatter that just drowns > everything out. I feel like there are usually at least 3 parallel > conversations

Re: [openstack-dev] Boston Forum Schedule

On 10/04/17 22:19, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 10/04/17 17:35 +0800, Tom Fifield wrote: Hi everyone, Thank you for the many excellent topics submitted for our first Forum. We have updated the topic submission site with

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Token expiration]

Thanks Dolph, I now have a pretty clear picture about it. Br, Tuan/Nokia On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 2:58 PM, Dolph Mathews wrote: > The token itself is still expired, regardless of where it's persisted, if > at all. Expired tokens are only considered valid when

[openstack-dev] [neutron][sfc][fwaas][taas][horizon] where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects?

Hi neutrinos (and horizoners), As the title says, where would we like to have horizon dashboard for neutron stadium projects? There are several projects under neutron stadium and they are trying to add dashboard support. I would like to raise this topic again. No dashboard support lands since

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui] another i18n proposal for heat templates 'description' help strings

Hi Peng, I added some thoughts in-line, let me know what you think. On 10 April 2017 at 08:10, Peng Wu wrote: > Hi, > > In TripleO UI project users requested translation of the web UI. But > some web UI strings are displayed from heat template files in tripleo- >

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 4/10/2017 8:58 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: Is there any deprecation policy in novaclient python binding? I was not aware of deprecation warnings. If novaclient follows nova deprecation, it sounds reasonable to me. Yes we deprecated the CLIs in this change in Newton: