Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-01 Thread Blair Bethwaite
Hi Alex, Likewise for option 3. If I recall correctly from the summit session that was also the main preference in the room? On 2 June 2017 at 11:15, George Mihaiescu wrote: > +1 for option 3 > > > > On Jun 1, 2017, at 11:06, Alexandra Settle wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tc][all] Tempest to reject trademark tests

2017-06-01 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:57:00AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-06-01 11:51:50 +0200: > > Graham Hayes wrote: > > > On 01/06/17 01:30, Matthew Treinish wrote: > > >> TBH, it's a bit premature to have the discussion. These additional > > >> programs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [Keystone][PublicCloud] Introducing Adjutant, an OpenStack service for signups, user invites, password reset and more!

2017-06-01 Thread Andy Botting
We caught up with some of the Catalyst guys at the Melbourne OpenStack Australia day and they gave us a demo of this. Looks like a really nice project that I think might replace some of existing user management workflow. Allowing project managers to invite collaborators and self-manage their

[openstack-dev] [nova] Supporting volume_type when booting from volume

2017-06-01 Thread 한승진
Hello, stackers I am just curious about the results of lots of discussions on the below blueprint. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/support-volume-type-with-bdm-parameter Can I ask what the concolusion is? __

[openstack-dev] [karbor] Karbor weekly irc meeting

2017-06-01 Thread Chen Ying
Hi guys, Karbor weekly meeting will be held at 1500 UTC each even week and 0900 UTC each odd week #openstack-meeting. So next karbor IRC meeting will be held at 2017-06-06 0900 UTC. Please feel free to add your topics here. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Karbor

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-01 Thread Arkady.Kanevsky
Option 3 sound reasonable if wiki can be searchable. -Original Message- From: Blair Bethwaite [mailto:blair.bethwa...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 8:44 PM To: Alexandra Settle Cc: OpenStack Operators ;

Re: [openstack-dev] [cyborg]Nominate Rushil Chugh and Justin Kilpatrick as new core reviewers

2017-06-01 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi Team, Given that there had been no objections, I would like to congrat and welcome Justin and Rushil to our core team :) On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Harm Sluiman wrote: > +1 > I haven't had time to actively participate these past months but have > monitored and

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [tc] [all] more tempest plugins (was Re: [tc] [all] TC Report 22)

2017-06-01 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 11:09:56AM +0100, Chris Dent wrote: > A lot of this results, in part, from there being no single guiding > pattern and principle for how (and where) the tests are to be > managed. It sounds like you want to write a general testing guide for openstack. Have you started

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-01 Thread George Mihaiescu
+1 for option 3 > On Jun 1, 2017, at 11:06, Alexandra Settle wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I haven’t had any feedback regarding moving the Operations Guide to the > OpenStack wiki. I’m not taking silence as compliance. I would really like to > hear people’s opinions on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] revised structure of the heat-templates repository. Suggestions

2017-06-01 Thread Lance Haig
Hi, One question I have not asked on this thread is. What would you like to see changed within the repository and do you have a suggestion onhow to fix it. Regards Lance On 31.05.17 16:03, Lance Haig wrote: Hi, On 24.05.17 18:43, Zane Bitter wrote: On 19/05/17 11:00, Lance Haig

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Onboarding rooms postmortem, what did you do, what worked, lessons learned

2017-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-05-19 09:22:07 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote: > [...] >> the project, > > I hosted the onboarding session for the Infrastructure team. For > various logistical reasons discussed on the planning thread before > the PTG, it was a shared session with many other

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSC][ironic][mogan][nova] mogan and nova co-existing

2017-06-01 Thread Zhenguo Niu
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:01 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 05/31/2017 01:31 AM, Zhenguo Niu wrote: > >> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com>> wrote: >> >> On May 30, 2017, at 9:36 PM, Zhenguo Niu >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] FWaaS/VPNaaS dashboard split out from horizon

2017-06-01 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi all, > > As discussed last month [1], we agree that each neutron-related > dashboard has its own repository. > I would like to move this forward on FWaaS and VPNaaS > as the horizon team plans to split them out as

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] FWaaS/VPNaaS dashboard split out from horizon

2017-06-01 Thread Itxaka Serrano Garcia
On 31/05/17 15:12, Akihiro Motoki wrote: Hi all, As discussed last month [1], we agree that each neutron-related dashboard has its own repository. I would like to move this forward on FWaaS and VPNaaS as the horizon team plans to split them out as horizon plugins. A couple of questions hit

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptls][all] Potential Queens Goal: Migrate Off Paste

2017-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Amrith Kumar wrote: > I agree, this would be a good thing to do and something which will definitely > improve the overall ease of upgrades. We already have two Queens goals > though; do we want to add a third? Hmm, we only have one so far ?

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tc][all] Tempest to reject trademark tests

2017-06-01 Thread Matthew Treinish
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 12:32:03PM +0900, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Matthew Treinish wrote: > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 04:24:14PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > >> On 2017-05-31 17:18:54 +0100 (+0100), Graham Hayes wrote: > >> [...] > >> >

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Undercloud backup and restore

2017-06-01 Thread Shinobu Kinjo
Hi Carlos, Since I thought that that is a kind of documentation bug, I filed a bug on this as Doc bug. Now I'm seeing that you were assigned... Regards, Shinobu Kinjo On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Carlos Camacho Gonzalez wrote: > Hi Shinobu, > > It's really helpful to

[openstack-dev] [collectd-ceilometer-plugin] dpdkstat related meters are not displayed under "ceilometer meter-list"

2017-06-01 Thread rajeev.satyanaray...@wipro.com
Hi All, I am working on bringing up Newton version of Openstack on 3 Nodes(Controller, Compute and Network). I am using OVS with DPDK on my Compute Node and to get dpdk port related statistics on my Ceilometer, I have configured collectd to use DPDKSTAT plugin and also enabled the

Re: [openstack-dev] [EXTERNAL] Re: [Tripleo] deploy software on Openstack controller on the Overcloud

2017-06-01 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Abhishek Kane wrote: > Hi Emilien, > > The bin does following things on controller: > 1. Install core HyperScale packages. Should be done by Puppet, with Package resource. > 2. Start HyperScale API server Should be done by Puppet, with

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Gate issues

2017-06-01 Thread Yujun Zhang (ZTE)
We have encountered similar issue also in OPNFV. It seems to be a problem of setuptools 36.0.0 and it is now removed from pypi. Hope it resolves the vitrage gate tests as well. See discussion in https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues/1042 On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:08 PM Afek, Ifat (Nokia -

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptl][all] Potential Queens Goal: Continuing Python 3.5+ Support

2017-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Emilien Macchi's message of 2017-06-01 15:31:10 +0200: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Mike wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > For this thread we will be discussing continuing Python 3.5+ support. > > Emilien who has been helping with coordinating our efforts

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptls][all] Potential Queens Goal: Migrate Off Paste

2017-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Amrith Kumar wrote: > Thierry, isn't the py35 goal continuing for Queens? That's an open question, which is discussed in its own thread: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-May/117746.html -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][mistral][tripleo][horizon][nova][releases] release models for projects tracked in global-requirements.txt

2017-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Renat Akhmerov wrote: > We have a weekly meeting next Monday, will it be too late? Before Thursday EOD (when the Pike-2 deadline hits) should be OK. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Gate issues

2017-06-01 Thread Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL/Kfar Sava)
Hi, Note that we are currently having problems with the Vitrage gate tests, related to python-setuptools. Other projects experience similar problems. We hope to fix it by the beginning of next week. Best Regards, Ifat.

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] error handling

2017-06-01 Thread Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL/Kfar Sava)
From: "Yujun Zhang (ZTE)" Date: Thursday, 1 June 2017 at 18:10 On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:49 PM Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL/Kfar Sava) > wrote: So for now we agree that we need to add a UI for configuration information and

[openstack-dev] No drivers meeting 6/1

2017-06-01 Thread Kevin Benton
Hi, Due to a conflict today I am canceling the drivers meeting. Cheers, Kevin Benton __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] Security bug in diskimage-builder

2017-06-01 Thread Ben Nemec
On 05/30/2017 10:05 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:43 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 05/30/2017 08:00 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-05-29 15:43:43 +0200 (+0200), Emilien

[openstack-dev] [tc][ptls][all] Potential Queens Goal: Implement collection link OR full discovery alignment

2017-06-01 Thread Monty Taylor
Hey everybody! I have submitted two potential goals for Queens: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468436 - add collection links https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468437 - full discovery alignment One is a subset of the other, so the decision is two-fold * do we do this at all? * do we do the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-01 Thread Michał Jastrzębski
On 1 June 2017 at 09:22, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-06-01 16:38:05 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: > [...] >> For teams that are placed on the Wednesday-Friday segment, please >> let us know whether you'd like to make use of the room on Friday >> (pick between 2 days

Re: [openstack-dev] [swift][release][Release-job-failures] Tag of openstack/swift failed

2017-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from jenkins's message of 2017-05-31 22:46:21 +: > Build failed. > > - swift-releasenotes > http://logs.openstack.org/e9/e9032fbea361df790901022740ac837a2a02daa0/tag/swift-releasenotes/687d120/ > : FAILURE in 1m 47s > This failure was just with publishing the release notes after

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > Looks good! What is approximate size of L room? L can fit 30-50 people. We'll get more precise once we start mapping those to actual rooms. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][release][Release-job-failures] Tag of openstack/puppet-nova failed

2017-06-01 Thread Emilien Macchi
Thanks Doug for this one! --- Emilien Macchi On Jun 1, 2017 6:21 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: > Excerpts from jenkins's message of 2017-05-31 20:26:33 +: > > Build failed. > > > > - puppet-nova-releasenotes http://logs.openstack.org/d9/ >

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] error handling

2017-06-01 Thread Yujun Zhang (ZTE)
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 10:49 PM Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL/Kfar Sava) < ifat.a...@nokia.com> wrote: So for now we agree that we need to add a UI for configuration information > and datasources status. > > Sounds good. In order to implement in UI, we shall also need api to expose them right? --

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [tc] [all] more tempest plugins (was Re: [tc] [all] TC Report 22)

2017-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Chris Dent's message of 2017-06-01 11:09:56 +0100: > On Wed, 31 May 2017, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Yeah, it sounds like the current organization of the repo is not > > ideal in terms of equal playing field for all of our project teams. > > I would be fine with all of the interop

[openstack-dev] {OpenStack-Ansible] Meeting Cancelled

2017-06-01 Thread Amy Marrich
Sorry for the short notice but today's meeting has been cancelled. We'll resume with our bug-triage on Tuesday and our next Meeting on next Thursday at their usual times and places. Amy (spotz) __ OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet][release][Release-job-failures] Tag of openstack/puppet-nova failed

2017-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from jenkins's message of 2017-05-31 20:26:33 +: > Build failed. > > - puppet-nova-releasenotes > http://logs.openstack.org/d9/d913ccd1ea88f3661c32b0fcfdac58d749cd4eb2/tag/puppet-nova-releasenotes/cefa30a/ > : FAILURE in 2m 13s > This failure only prevented the release notes from

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Blueprint process question

2017-06-01 Thread David Lyle
There have been a couple of projects that would like some space in the page header. I think the work in Horizon is to provide an extensible space in the page header for plugins to post content. The UI plugin for Vitrage, in this case, would then be responsible for populating that content if

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [dev] [doc] Operations Guide future

2017-06-01 Thread Alexandra Settle
Hi everyone, I haven’t had any feedback regarding moving the Operations Guide to the OpenStack wiki. I’m not taking silence as compliance. I would really like to hear people’s opinions on this matter. To recap: 1. Option one: Kill the Operations Guide completely and move the

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] regional incoming storage targets

2017-06-01 Thread Mehdi Abaakouk
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 01:46:21PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: On Wed, May 31 2017, gordon chung wrote: […] i'm not entirely sure this is an issue, just thought i'd raise it to discuss. It's a really interesting point you raise. I never thought we could do that but indeed, we could. Maybe

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tc][all] Tempest to reject trademark tests

2017-06-01 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-06-01 11:51:50 +0200: > Graham Hayes wrote: > > On 01/06/17 01:30, Matthew Treinish wrote: > >> TBH, it's a bit premature to have the discussion. These additional > >> programs do > >> not exist yet, and there is a governance road block around this.

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-01 16:38:05 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] > For teams that are placed on the Wednesday-Friday segment, please > let us know whether you'd like to make use of the room on Friday > (pick between 2 days or 3 days). [...] As you didn't specify how to let you know, I'll just

Re: [openstack-dev] Security bug in diskimage-builder

2017-06-01 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-06-01 10:40:34 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote: [...] > Okay, so we're all set up, but now it appears we're all subscribed to every > tripleo bug as well. I think oslo-coresec used to be the same way, but at > some point it changed so I only get explicitly notified of security bugs. > Does

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the coming week (06/02-06-08)

2017-06-01 Thread Brian Rosmaita
As discussed at today's Glance meeting, the priorities for this week are to prepare for the P-2 milestone release. The changes below must be merged by 12:00 UTC Wednesday 7 June 2017. Please give them your full attention. 1 Image import refactor MVP - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443636/ -

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tc][all] Tempest to reject trademark tests

2017-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Graham Hayes wrote: > On 01/06/17 01:30, Matthew Treinish wrote: >> TBH, it's a bit premature to have the discussion. These additional programs >> do >> not exist yet, and there is a governance road block around this. Right now >> the >> set of projects that can be used defcore/interopWG is

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [tc] [all] more tempest plugins (was Re: [tc] [all] TC Report 22)

2017-06-01 Thread Chris Dent
On Wed, 31 May 2017, Doug Hellmann wrote: Yeah, it sounds like the current organization of the repo is not ideal in terms of equal playing field for all of our project teams. I would be fine with all of the interop tests being in a plugin together, or of saying that the tempest repo should only

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tc][all] Tempest to reject trademark tests

2017-06-01 Thread Graham Hayes
On 01/06/17 01:30, Matthew Treinish wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 03:45:52PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2017-05-31 15:22:59 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: >>> On 2017-05-31 09:43:11 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> [...] it's news to me that they're considering

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][mistral][tripleo][horizon][nova][releases] release models for projects tracked in global-requirements.txt

2017-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Renat Akhmerov wrote: > On 31 May 2017, 15:08 +0700, Thierry Carrez , wrote: >>> [mistral] >>> mistral - blocking sqlalchemy - milestones >> >> I wonder why mistral is in requirements. Looks like tripleo-common is >> depending on it ? Could someone shine some light on this ?

[openstack-dev] [doc] Docs team meeting

2017-06-01 Thread Alexandra Settle
Hey everyone, The docs meeting will continue today in #openstack-meeting as scheduled (Thursday at 16:00 UTC). For more details, and the agenda, see the meeting page: - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting The meeting chair will be me! Hope you can

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova][os-brick] Testing for proposed iSCSI OS-Brick code

2017-06-01 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On 31/05, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 5/31/2017 6:58 AM, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As some of you may know I've been working on improving iSCSI connections > > on OpenStack to make them more robust and prevent them from leaving > > leftovers on attach/detach operations. > > > > There

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano][barbican] Encrypting sensitive properties

2017-06-01 Thread Paul Bourke
Thanks for that Kirill. Optional sounds good. Right now I'm leaning towards encrypting the full object model in the database rather than selective attributes, I can't think of a reason not to do this and it makes things more transparent and straight forward for the user. I've added a spec for

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [tc] [all] more tempest plugins (was Re: [tc] [all] TC Report 22)

2017-06-01 Thread Rabi Mishra
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2017, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> Yeah, it sounds like the current organization of the repo is not >> ideal in terms of equal playing field for all of our project teams. >> I would be fine with all of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [EXTERNAL] Re: [TripleO] custom configuration to overcloud fails second time

2017-06-01 Thread Dnyaneshwar Pawar
Another observation - Steps: 1. openstack overcloud deploy --templates -e myconfig_1.yaml 2. openstack overcloud update overcloud 3. openstack overcloud deploy --templates -e myconfig_2.yaml With this steps in sequence, configuration of myconfig_2.yaml is applied successfully. (still config in

[openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2017-06-01 Thread Ed Leafe
Greetings OpenStack community, A very lively meeting today, with all the participants in a seemingly jovial mood. Must be something in the water. Or maybe June just brings out lightheartedness. Much of the discussion centered on Monty Taylor's chain of patches [4] regarding version discovery

Re: [openstack-dev] Security bug in diskimage-builder

2017-06-01 Thread Ben Nemec
On 06/01/2017 11:31 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-06-01 10:40:34 -0500 (-0500), Ben Nemec wrote: [...] Okay, so we're all set up, but now it appears we're all subscribed to every tripleo bug as well. I think oslo-coresec used to be the same way, but at some point it changed so I only get

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptls][all] Potential Queens Goal: Migrate Off Paste

2017-06-01 Thread Amrith Kumar
OK, I'd assumed that from earlier conversations about py35 being a multi-release goal, that it would have been a shoe-in. But yes, if it is still a possibility that the community would do py1.75 in pike and not commit to the other py1.75 in queens, sure, there's only one committed goal for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Cockroachdb for Keystone Multi-master

2017-06-01 Thread Jay Pipes
On 05/31/2017 11:06 PM, Mike Bayer wrote: I'd also throw in, there's lots of versions of Galera with different bugfixes / improvements as we go along, not to mention configuration settings if Jay observes it working great on a distributed cluster and Clint observes it working terribly, it

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] regional incoming storage targets

2017-06-01 Thread Julien Danjou
On Wed, May 31 2017, gordon chung wrote: […] > i'm not entirely sure this is an issue, just thought i'd raise it to > discuss. It's a really interesting point you raise. I never thought we could do that but indeed, we could. Maybe we built a great architecture after all. ;-) Easy solution:

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] nominating Mike Fedosin for glance core

2017-06-01 Thread Brian Rosmaita
Having heard only affirmative responses, I've added Mikhail Fedosin to the Glance core group, with all the rights and privileges pertaining thereto. Welcome back to the Glance core team, Mike! I'd also like to express my personal thanks to you for stepping up to help out the Glance project in

Re: [openstack-dev] [EXTERNAL] Re: [TripleO] custom configuration to overcloud fails second time

2017-06-01 Thread Jiří Stránský
On 31.5.2017 17:40, Dnyaneshwar Pawar wrote: Hi Ben, On 5/31/17, 8:06 PM, "Ben Nemec" > wrote: I think we would need to see what your custom config templates look like as well. Custom config templates:

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][mistral][tripleo][horizon][nova][releases] release models for projects tracked in global-requirements.txt

2017-06-01 Thread Renat Akhmerov
Thanks Thierry. To me it sounds like even a better release model for us. We can discuss it with a team at the next team meeting and make a decision. Renat Akhmerov @Nokia On 1 Jun 2017, 17:06 +0700, Thierry Carrez , wrote: > Renat Akhmerov wrote: > > On 31 May 2017,

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-01 Thread John Dickinson
On 1 Jun 2017, at 7:38, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Thierry Carrez wrote: >> In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a >> purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more >> inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments >> were positive. >> >> We

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] tempest failures when deploying neutron-server in wsgi with apache

2017-06-01 Thread Morales, Victor
Hi Emilien, I noticed that the configuration file was created using puppet. I submitted a patch[1] that was targeting to include the changes in Devstack. My major concern is with the value of WSGIScriptAlias which should be pointing to WSGI script. Regards/Saludos Victor Morales [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Cockroachdb for Keystone Multi-master

2017-06-01 Thread Andrey Grebennikov
We had a very similar conversation multiple times with Keystone cores (multi-site Keystone). Geo-rep Galera was suggested first and it was immediately declined (one of the reasons was the case of complete corruption of Keystone DB everywhere in case of accidental table corrupt in one site) by me

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][tc][all] Tempest to reject trademark tests

2017-06-01 Thread Sean McGinnis
> > And yes, I agree with the argument that we should be fair and treat > all projects the same way. If we're going to move tests out of the > tempest repository, we should move all of them. The QA team can > still help maintain the test suites for whatever projects they want, > even if those

[openstack-dev] [tc][ptls][all] Potential Queens Goal: Move policy and policy docs into code

2017-06-01 Thread Lance Bragstad
Hi all, I've proposed a community-wide goal for Queens to move policy into code and supply documentation for each policy [0]. I've included references to existing documentation and specifications completed by various projects and attempted to lay out the benefits for both developers and

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] Blueprint process question

2017-06-01 Thread Waines, Greg
Hey David, Yeah I agree. I responded to Rob with the same thinking. I don’t mind taking a first pass at the Horizon blueprint / work to provide an extensible space in the page header for plugins to post content. And I will then move the content of this blueprint, as you suggest, to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone] Cockroachdb for Keystone Multi-master

2017-06-01 Thread Lance Bragstad
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Andrey Grebennikov < agrebenni...@mirantis.com> wrote: > We had a very similar conversation multiple times with Keystone cores > (multi-site Keystone). > Geo-rep Galera was suggested first and it was immediately declined (one of > the reasons was the case of

Re: [openstack-dev] [EXTERNAL] Re: [Tripleo] deploy software on Openstack controller on the Overcloud

2017-06-01 Thread Abhishek Kane
Hi Emilien, The bin does following things on controller: 1. Install core HyperScale packages. 2. Start HyperScale API server 3. Install UI packages. This will add new files to and modify some existing files of Horison. 4. Create HyperScale user in mysql db. Create database and dump config. Add

Re: [openstack-dev] [collectd-ceilometer-plugin] dpdkstat related meters are not displayed under "ceilometer meter-list"

2017-06-01 Thread gordon chung
On 01/06/17 03:51 AM, rajeev.satyanaray...@wipro.com wrote: > I am working on bringing up Newton version of Openstack on 3 > Nodes(Controller, Compute and Network). I am using OVS with DPDK on my > Compute Node and to get dpdk port related statistics on my Ceilometer, I > have configured

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptl][all] Potential Queens Goal: Continuing Python 3.5+ Support

2017-06-01 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Mike wrote: > Hello everyone, > > For this thread we will be discussing continuing Python 3.5+ support. > Emilien who has been helping with coordinating our efforts here with > Pike can probably add more here, but glancing at our goals document

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] using keystone right - catalog, endpoints, tokens and noauth

2017-06-01 Thread Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Hi all, thanks Monty for the feedback. I've started this set of patches in ironic [0] (very WiP currently), and would really like some eyes on them (not right now, as I plan to rewrite those basing on this conversation :) but soon I hope). Also I have some questions/comments inline: On Thu, May

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][mistral][tripleo][horizon][nova][releases] release models for projects tracked in global-requirements.txt

2017-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Note that it's technically too late to change the release model (milestone-1 is the deadline), but since that kills two birds with one stone, I'd be willing to grant mistral an exception (as long as it's done before milestone-2, which is next week). Renat Akhmerov wrote: > Thanks Thierry. > > To

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptls][all] Potential Queens Goal: Migrate Off Paste

2017-06-01 Thread Amrith Kumar
Thierry, isn't the py35 goal continuing for Queens? -- Amrith Kumar amrith.ku...@gmail.com > -Original Message- > From: Thierry Carrez [mailto:thie...@openstack.org] > Sent: Thursday, June 1, 2017 4:35 AM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][mistral][tripleo][horizon][nova][releases] release models for projects tracked in global-requirements.txt

2017-06-01 Thread Renat Akhmerov
We have a weekly meeting next Monday, will it be too late? Renat Akhmerov @Nokia On 1 Jun 2017, 20:10 +0700, Thierry Carrez , wrote: > Note that it's technically too late to change the release model > (milestone-1 is the deadline), but since that kills two birds with one >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptg] Strawman Queens PTG week slicing

2017-06-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
Thierry Carrez wrote: > In a previous thread[1] I introduced the idea of moving the PTG from a > purely horizontal/vertical week split to a more > inter-project/intra-project activities split, and the initial comments > were positive. > > We need to solidify how the week will look like before we

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] error handling

2017-06-01 Thread Afek, Ifat (Nokia - IL/Kfar Sava)
Hi Yujun, Indeed, during the initialization phase it might be beneficial to make sure the user is aware of configuration problems (although I’m not sure that crashing is the solution). The problem is that the same code is executed both in initialization and later on, so telling the difference

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi] regional incoming storage targets

2017-06-01 Thread gordon chung
On 01/06/17 07:46 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Yes, write doc or log an issue at least. It's best way to keep a public > track now on ideas and what's going on since it's what people are going > to read and search into. added here: https://github.com/gnocchixyz/gnocchi/issues/60 -- gord