Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] redo gate jobs only

2017-08-03 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-08-03 07:37, Eric K wrote: > Hi all is there a command on review.openstack.org that triggers a redo of > gate jobs but not check jobs (already passed)? > `remerge` doesn¹t seem to do anything. Thanks! This is explained in

[openstack-dev] Recall: [Cinder] string freeze exception for VMAX driver

2017-08-03 Thread Walsh, Helen
Walsh, Helen would like to recall the message, "[openstack-dev] [Cinder] string freeze exception for VMAX driver". __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cyborg]Queens PTL candidacy

2017-08-03 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Yes tony I was intended to refer to the official procedure for the self-nomination period, which would be 5 buiz days. Thx for the offer to help with the civs poll :) On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:59:55AM +0800, Zhipeng

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cyborg]Queens PTL candidacy

2017-08-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:59:55AM +0800, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > More on the election procedure, if there are more than one candidate, we > will use http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/ to conduct our election. If there is > only one candidate, then no election will be held the candidate will be >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cyborg]Queens PTL candidacy

2017-08-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:59:55AM +0800, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Hi Team, > > Even though Cyborg is not an official project yet, however with an ultimate > goal of becoming one it is necessary to conduct our project governance with > compliance of OpenStack community general requirements/culture.

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] string freeze exception for VMAX driver

2017-08-03 Thread Walsh, Helen
To whom it may concern, I would like to request a string freeze exception for 2 patches that are on the merge queue for Pike. 1. VMAX driver - align VMAX QOS settings with front end (CI Passed) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/484885/7/cinder/volume/drivers/dell_emc/vmax/rest.py line

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Nova] Editing flavor causing instance flavor display error

2017-08-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 08/02/2017 10:12 PM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Hi All, > > Horizon provided the feature to allow user edit existing flavors, no > matter it is currently used by any instances or not. While Nova doesn't > provide this kind of ability, Horizon achieved this by deleting the old > flavor first and

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

2017-08-03 Thread Andrey Kurilin
hi Clark, Do you have any plans to update to 2.14 release which has a new polymer based user interface? 2017-08-03 1:57 GMT+03:00 Clark Boylan : > Hello, > > The Infra team is planning to upgrade review.openstack.org from Gerrit > 2.11 to Gerrit 2.13 on September 18,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

2017-08-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 08/02/2017 03:32 PM, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> My gut response is to say that if the example uses nova-manage or >> one of the nova service executables, then that makes sense to leave >> in the nova tree, but otherwise

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

2017-08-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 08/02/2017 08:53 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Akihiro Motoki's message of 2017-08-03 01:02:59 +0900: >>> 2017-08-03 0:52 GMT+09:00 Doug Hellmann : Excerpts from Stephen

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Nova] Editing flavor causing instance flavor display error

2017-08-03 Thread Zhenyu Zheng
I was thinking, the current "edit" in Horizon is delete-and-create, and it is there maybe just because flavor has many fields, user may want to have a new flavor but just modify one of the old flavor, so they don't want to manually copy all other fields. And it is the automatic delete action that

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Apply for exception to having Storwize cinder Tiramisu replication patch reviewed and merged

2017-08-03 Thread Xiao Qin SH Li
Hi Sean   Thanks a lot for your response.  And we will make it in Q release. Regards Xiao Qin Li Cloud Storage Solutions DevelopmentIBM China Systems & Technology Laboratory in ShanghaiEmail: lix...@cn.ibm.comTel: 86-21-609289553/F, Building 10, 399 Keyuan Road, Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong New

[openstack-dev] [charms] ptl for queens

2017-08-03 Thread James Page
Hi All I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the OpenStack Charms project for the Queens development cycle. We've made some good progress during the Pike cycle in terms of improving documentation, with a new deployment guide in the works which should make things much easier for new

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] nominate Aditi Sharma to Watcher Core group

2017-08-03 Thread bao.yumeng
+1__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] nominate Aditi Sharma to Watcher Core group

2017-08-03 Thread Vincent FRANCOISE
+1 -- Vincent FRANCOISE {P} R Engineer Network & Security {T} +33 (0) 2 56 35 88 53 {W} www.b-com.com From: ? ? (Alexander Chadin) Sent: 02 August 2017 14:47 To: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Nova] Editing flavor causing instance flavor display error

2017-08-03 Thread Sean Dague
On 08/03/2017 06:13 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > I was thinking, the current "edit" in Horizon is delete-and-create, and > it is there maybe just because > flavor has many fields, user may want to have a new flavor but just > modify one of the old flavor, so > they don't want to manually copy all

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][tc] IMPORTANT upcoming change to technical elections

2017-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
> On Aug 2, 2017, at 10:53 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2017-07-17 16:17:00 + (+), Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> If you want to run or vote in upcoming elections for PTL and TC, >> make sure your Foundation Individual Membership is active and has at >> least one Email

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][stable][ptl][infra] Strategic discussion regarding the future of documentation for EOL releases

2017-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:20:24 +1000: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:05:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > That content will now live in the project trees. Perhaps part of marking > > branches in those repos EOL needs to include deleting the install tree > > from

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

2017-08-03 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 08/03/2017 04:50 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-08-03 16:16:12 +0200: Hi! On 08/03/2017 03:03 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Welcome to our regular release countdown email! Actions --- Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

2017-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-08-03 16:16:12 +0200: > Hi! > > On 08/03/2017 03:03 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Welcome to our regular release countdown email! > > > > > > > > > Actions > > --- > > > > Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model should post a

[openstack-dev] [tc][packaging][deb] retiring Packaging Deb project

2017-08-03 Thread Allison Randal
Hi all, The Debian OpenStack packagers are gathered at the annual Debian developer event, and discussing the future of OpenStack packaging for Debian. There's general agreement that we'd like to go ahead and package Pike, but also agreement that we'd like to move back to the Debian infrastructure

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][Nova] Editing flavor causing instance flavor display error

2017-08-03 Thread Chris Friesen
On 08/03/2017 04:21 AM, Sean Dague wrote: On 08/03/2017 06:13 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: I was thinking, the current "edit" in Horizon is delete-and-create, and it is there maybe just because flavor has many fields, user may want to have a new flavor but just modify one of the old flavor, so they

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][packaging][deb] retiring Packaging Deb project

2017-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Allison Randal's message of 2017-08-03 10:09:59 -0400: > Hi all, > > The Debian OpenStack packagers are gathered at the annual Debian > developer event, and discussing the future of OpenStack packaging for > Debian. There's general agreement that we'd like to go ahead and package >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

2017-08-03 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-08-03 18:03, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-08-03 17:33:46 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: > [...] >> this would mean that depends-on does not work anymore - if you update >> the upper-constraint file and want to test, you can use depends-on today. >> >> with uploading to tarballs,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

2017-08-03 Thread Clark Boylan
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017, at 09:11 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote: > On 03.08.2017 00:57, Clark Boylan wrote: > > Hello, > > > > The Infra team is planning to upgrade review.openstack.org from Gerrit > > 2.11 to Gerrit 2.13 on September 18, 2017. > > [...] > > > > If you have any concerns or feedback

[openstack-dev] [docs] [training-guides] Moving from Hieroglyph for rendering slides

2017-08-03 Thread Pančur , Matjaž
Hi all, Andreas filed a bug report [1] that can impact what will we use to render slides for Upstream University and other training related slide material in the future. We’ve already had many discussions at Training guides meetings about moving to some other more actively maintained/developed

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] [training-guides] Moving from Hieroglyph for rendering slides

2017-08-03 Thread Luigi Toscano
On Thursday, 3 August 2017 18:18:31 CEST Pančur, Matjaž wrote: > Hi all, > > Andreas filed a bug report [1] that can impact what will we use to render > slides for Upstream University and other training related slide material in > the future. We’ve already had many discussions at Training guides

[openstack-dev] [Designate] PTL Nomination

2017-08-03 Thread Graham Hayes
Hi All, I would like to nominate myself as PTL for the Designate project for the Queens Cycle. I have been a developer on the project since Grizzly and served as PTL for the Mitaka, Newton and Ocata cycles. My main aim will be to build up contributors to the project, while keeping the project

Re: [openstack-dev] [refstack][interop-wg] Non-candidacy for RefStack PTL

2017-08-03 Thread David.Paterson
Dell - Internal Use - Confidential You've done a great job Catherine, thank you! dp From: Catherine Cuong Diep [mailto:cd...@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 3:15 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org;

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

2017-08-03 Thread Dave McCowan (dmccowan)
On 8/1/17, 8:02 PM, "Tony Breeds" wrote: >On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:58:22PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >> Excerpts from Dave McCowan (dmccowan)'s message of 2017-08-01 20:48:12 >>+: >> > This note is to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

2017-08-03 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2017-08-03 17:04, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: >> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: Just to clarify: we cannot land the tox.ini

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

2017-08-03 Thread witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com
> -Original Message- > From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] > Sent: Donnerstag, 3. August 2017 15:45 > To: openstack-dev > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] > [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python- > monascaclient

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

2017-08-03 Thread Markus Zoeller
On 03.08.2017 00:57, Clark Boylan wrote: > Hello, > > The Infra team is planning to upgrade review.openstack.org from Gerrit > 2.11 to Gerrit 2.13 on September 18, 2017. > [...] > > If you have any concerns or feedback please let the Infra team know. > > Thank you, > Clark Does this maybe

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

2017-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: > > > Just to clarify: we cannot land the tox.ini change until the requirements > > > repo >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

2017-08-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-08-03 17:33:46 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: [...] > this would mean that depends-on does not work anymore - if you update > the upper-constraint file and want to test, you can use depends-on today. > > with uploading to tarballs, this will not work, I think this is more about the

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

2017-08-03 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
Hi! On 08/03/2017 03:03 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Welcome to our regular release countdown email! Actions --- Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model should post a RC1 openstack/releases request during the week (X.0.0.0rc1), together with a stable/pike branch request.

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][security] To firewalld, or not to firewalld

2017-08-03 Thread Logan V.
Ferm DSL is nice and featureful. There's a pretty sophisticated debops ferm role at [1] allowing for pretty sophisticated rule definitions [2]. Structurally I think the most important thing is having the ability to define rules in layers based on host_vars, group_vars, etc. and have them blended

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] review.openstack.org downtime and Gerrit upgrade

2017-08-03 Thread Clark Boylan
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017, at 03:04 AM, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > hi Clark, > > Do you have any plans to update to 2.14 release which has a new polymer > based user interface? > We decided to not try and go straight to 2.14 because it requires newer java and introduces the notedb which is a fairly large

[openstack-dev] [QA] Queens PTL candidacy

2017-08-03 Thread Andrea Frittoli
Dear all, I’d like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the QA Program for the Queens cycle [0]. I served as PTL for QA during the Pike cycle, and I would be honoured to continue to do so in the next six months. After a few years working with the OpenStack community, I continue to find it an

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Facilitating automation testing in TripleO UI

2017-08-03 Thread Ana Krivokapic
Hi TripleO devs, In our effort to make the TripleO UI code friendlier to automation testing[1], there is an open review[2] for which we seem to have some difficulty reaching the consensus on how best to proceed. There is already a discussion happening on the review itself, and I'd like to move it

[openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

2017-08-03 Thread Ed Leafe
Greetings OpenStack community, Today's meeting started off with continued discussion about the Guided Review process that we are trying to create ahead of the Denver PTG, where we would like to incorporate such a process as part of our sessions. This has been crystallized into a document [0]

[openstack-dev] [all] [ptg] Policy Sessions

2017-08-03 Thread Lance Bragstad
One of the community goals for Queens is to move all policy into code and document it [0]. I'd like to make myself available to work with projects face-to-face if they need help at the PTG. In order to successfully plan that, we need to have an estimate of how many projects are interested in

[openstack-dev] [python-openstackclient][python-openstacksdk][neutron][nova] supporting resource extensions with our CLI

2017-08-03 Thread Boden Russell
I think we have a gap in our OSC CLI for non-stadium plugin/driver projects (neutron plugin projects, nova driver projects) that implement RESTful resource API attribute extensions. For details, go directly to [1]. For a summary read on... For OpenStack APIs that support extensions (ex [2]),

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] redo gate jobs only

2017-08-03 Thread Eric K
Thanks a lot Jeremy and Andreas for the reference and the added context! On 8/3/17, 10:49 AM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: >On 2017-08-03 08:15:36 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: >[...] >> "A patchset has to be approved to run tests in the gate pipeline. If the >> patchset

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

2017-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com's message of 2017-08-03 16:07:45 +: > > -Original Message- > > From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:d...@doughellmann.com] > > Sent: Donnerstag, 3. August 2017 15:45 > > To: openstack-dev > > Subject: Re:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][docs] Concerns with docs migration

2017-08-03 Thread Ruby Loo
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:55 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > ... > > b) I think that if we're going to refactor the Nova devref home page to be > a certain format, then we should really consider doing the same thing in > the other projects, because today they are all different

[openstack-dev] [octavia] PTL nomination

2017-08-03 Thread Michael Johnson
My fellow OpenStack community, I would like to nominate myself for Octavia PTL for Queens. I am currently the PTL for the Pike release series and would like to continue helping our team provide network load balancing services for OpenStack. For those of you that do not know me, I work for

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] redo gate jobs only

2017-08-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-08-03 08:15:36 +0200 (+0200), Andreas Jaeger wrote: [...] > "A patchset has to be approved to run tests in the gate pipeline. If the > patchset has failed in the gate pipeline (it will have been approved to > get into the gate pipeline) a recheck will first run the check jobs and > if

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

2017-08-03 Thread Eric K
As far as I can tell, bumping min version to 1.7.0 would not be a problem for Congress. Eric Kao On 8/3/17, 4:39 AM, "witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com" wrote: >Hello everyone, > >I would like to ask for the FFE for python-monascaclient version in >global requirements.

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] [docs] [training-guides] Moving from Hieroglyph for rendering slides

2017-08-03 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2017-08-03 16:18:31 + (+), Pančur, Matjaž wrote: [...] > We were leaning towards adopting a widely popular Reveal.js [2]. > On the downside, that probably also means that we will have to > convert slide material from RST to MD, as RST is not directly > supported. With a shrinking (Docs

[openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

2017-08-03 Thread Rajul Kumar
Hello everyone I have added a blueprint on having tail-based sampling as a sampling option for continuous tracing in OSProfiler. It would be really helpful to have some thoughts, ideas, comments on this from the community. Continuous tracing provides a good insight on how various transactions

[openstack-dev] VMWare Type Snapshot for Openstack 4.3

2017-08-03 Thread Tom Kennedy
All I would like to add an a new tab the the instance panel in Horizon that will allow me to manage VMWare type snapshots (take a snapshots, revert to a snapshot and delete a snapshot) .I see that this is implemented in nova(nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/server_snapshot.py) , but is

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

2017-08-03 Thread Rajul Kumar
Hi Boris That is a point of concern. Can you please direct to any of those? Anyways, we don't have anything in place for OpenStack yet. Now, either we pick another tracing solution like Zipkin, Jaeger etc. which have their own limitations OR enhance OSProfiler. We pick the later as it's most

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

2017-08-03 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Rajul, It makes sense! However, maybe it's a bit too late... ;) Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Rajul Kumar wrote: > Hello everyone > > I have added a blueprint on having tail-based sampling as a sampling > option for continuous tracing

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

2017-08-03 Thread Rajul Kumar
Hi Boris Good to hear from you. May I ask why you think so? We do see some potential with OSProfiler for this and further objectives. Thanks Rajul On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote: > Rajul, > > It makes sense! However, maybe it's a bit too late... ;) >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][packaging][deb] retiring Packaging Deb project

2017-08-03 Thread Paul Belanger
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 10:09:59AM -0400, Allison Randal wrote: > Hi all, > > The Debian OpenStack packagers are gathered at the annual Debian > developer event, and discussing the future of OpenStack packaging for > Debian. There's general agreement that we'd like to go ahead and package > Pike,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

2017-08-03 Thread Boris Pavlovic
Rajul, May I ask why you think so? Exposed by OSprofiler issues are going to be really hard to fix in current OpenStack architecture. Best regards, Boris Pavlovic On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Rajul Kumar wrote: > Hi Boris > > Good to hear from you. > May I ask

[openstack-dev] Tracing (all the places)

2017-08-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
Since I think there was another thread out there around tracing I'd thought I'd send out a few others for folks that show tracing being added to multiple other popular project (interesting to read over the proposals and such). -

[openstack-dev] [python-openstacksdk] Status of python-openstacksdk project

2017-08-03 Thread Michael Johnson
Hi OpenStack developers, I was wondering what is the current status of the python-openstacksdk project. The Octavia team has posted some patches implementing our new Octavia v2 API [1] in the SDK, but we have not had any reviews. I have also asked some questions in #openstack-sdks with no

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

2017-08-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 09:07:54AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-08-03 15:03:59 +0200: > > > Actions > > --- > > > > Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model should post a RC1 > > openstack/releases request during the week

[openstack-dev] [neutron] - FFE for neutron-fwaas v2 requested

2017-08-03 Thread Furukawa, Yushiro
Hi PTL/all, So sorry for late request. As I discussed in driver's meeting, I would like to request an exception for 'Firewall as a Service v2' (neutron-fwaas) and 'FWaaS v2 dashboard' (neutron-fwaas-dashboard) for Pike. Following patches are ready for review. SPEC:

Re: [openstack-dev] VMWare Type Snapshot for Openstack 4.3

2017-08-03 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/3/2017 3:16 PM, Tom Kennedy wrote: I see that this is implemented in nova(nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/server_snapshot.py) , but is not available in Horizon. I think you're looking at some forked code because that doesn't exist in upstream Nova:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - FFE for neutron-fwaas v2 requested

2017-08-03 Thread Akihiro Motoki
2017-08-04 12:05 GMT+09:00 Furukawa, Yushiro : > Hi PTL/all, > > So sorry for late request. As I discussed in driver's meeting, I would like > to > request an exception for 'Firewall as a Service v2' (neutron-fwaas) and > 'FWaaS v2 dashboard'

Re: [openstack-dev] Tracing (all the places)

2017-08-03 Thread Joshua Harlow
vin...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote: Hello harlowja, I'm really happy to see that you are back in this `tracing` topic [and @boris-42 (too)]. We never left, haha, but ya, I can say (and probably boris would agree) that trying to get OSprofiler started and integrated somewhat 'burned' both of us

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][release][stable][ptl][infra] Strategic discussion regarding the future of documentation for EOL releases

2017-08-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:10:49AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:20:24 +1000: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:05:16PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > That content will now live in the project trees. Perhaps part of marking > > > branches

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Call for help with in-tree tempest scenario test failures

2017-08-03 Thread Ihar Hrachyshka
Thanks for those who stepped in (Armando and Slawek). We still have quite some failures that would benefit from initial log triage and fixes. If you feel like in this feature freeze time you have less things to do, helping with those scenario failures would be a good way to contribute to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][bifrost] Unable to Enroll Inventory

2017-08-03 Thread Aimee Ukasick
Thanks Mark for pointing me in the right direction! It turned out to be a permissions issue with the local Ansible installation. I started over with a new user (stack, passwordless sudo) and decided to use the bifrost's env-setup script, which I was not able to run unless prefaced with sudo.

[openstack-dev] [ffe][release][requirements][tripleo]

2017-08-03 Thread Steve Baker
I would like to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the upper constraints of the python-paunch library/tool in Pike. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490287/ TripleO recently switched from using paunch as a library via heat-agents to using the paunch CLI tool directly using ansible.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][FFE]Allow DVR for E/W while leaving N/S centralized Edit

2017-08-03 Thread Swaminathan Vasudevan
Hi PTL/all, I would like to request an exception for inclusion of https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1667877. This fix addresses providing option for the customers to configure a new agent-type for centralizing the floatingip in the absence of external network connectivity. The RFE:

Re: [openstack-dev] Tracing (all the places)

2017-08-03 Thread vin...@vn.fujitsu.com
Hello harlowja, I'm really happy to see that you are back in this `tracing` topic [and @boris-42 (too)]. Last week, we saw that Rajul proposed 02 new blueprint in OSprofiler [1] and [2]. Besides, some other blueprints are being implemented in OSprofiler such as overhead control [3] and

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][performance] Proposing tail-based sampling in OSProfiler

2017-08-03 Thread vin...@vn.fujitsu.com
Hi Rajul, For the `agent idea`, I think it is very good. However, in OpenStack, that idea may be really hard for us. The reason is the same with what Boris think. For the sampling part, head-based sampling can be implemented in OSprofiler. For tail-based and adaptive sampling, it is another

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]pike-3 released

2017-08-03 Thread joehuang
Hello, Tricircle 3.4.0 (pike-3) released[1], it's time to do regression test and fix bugs, next milestone is pike-rc. [1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/488904/ Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] nominate Aditi Sharma to Watcher Core group

2017-08-03 Thread yumeng bao
+1 Good job Aditi! Let's keep it up__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][requirements][barbican][octavia][LBaaS][heat] FFE Request for python-barbicanclient library

2017-08-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 04:26:12PM +, Dave McCowan (dmccowan) wrote: > > > On 8/1/17, 8:02 PM, "Tony Breeds" wrote: > > >On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 04:58:22PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > >> Excerpts from Dave McCowan (dmccowan)'s message of 2017-08-01 20:48:12 >

[openstack-dev] [Tacker] remove Sripriya Seetharam from core reviewer team

2017-08-03 Thread gongys2017
Hi,   First,  thank Sripriya Seetharam for her great contribution to Tacker project. Howeverfor a long time, she cannot be reached via registered email and does not join the projectmeeting and has no review activities.   So I propose to remove Sripriya from tacker core reviewer team. And also

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

2017-08-03 Thread Rico Lin
Bumping min version to 1.7.0 would not be a problem for Heat. There might be a few minutes breaking (to merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490016) but won't affect much. 2017-08-04 2:20 GMT+08:00 Eric K : > As far as I can tell, bumping min version to 1.7.0 would

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

2017-08-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:39:47AM +, witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to ask for the FFE for python-monascaclient version in global > requirements. > > The current version in Pike (1.7.0) is not fully backward compatible. The > monasca exception

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

2017-08-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:04:52AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from Dmitry Tantsur's message of 2017-07-29 20:06:18 +0200: > > > > Just to clarify:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] FFE for dns_domain for ports extension

2017-08-03 Thread Kevin Benton
Granted: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-08-03-22.02.log.html On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Miguel Lavalle wrote: > Hi PTL/all > > I want to request an exception to include the dns_domain for ports > extension in the Pike

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] - FFE for security-group logging requested

2017-08-03 Thread Kevin Benton
Granted: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-08-03-22.02.log.html On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:19 AM, Furukawa, Yushiro < y.furukaw...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > Hi Kevin(PTL)/all, > > I would like to request an exception for 'Logging feature' for Pike. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] FFE for midonet v2 plugin removal

2017-08-03 Thread Kevin Benton
Granted: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-08-03-22.02.log.html On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 12:19 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Takashi Yamamoto > wrote: > > hi, > > > > I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] FFE for net-mtu-enh api extension requested

2017-08-03 Thread Kevin Benton
Granted: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-08-03-22.02.log.html On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > Hi PTL/all, > > I would like to request an exception for inclusion of net-mtu-enh API > extension (with

[openstack-dev] [ffe][release][requirements][tripleo] FFE for python-paunch-1.5.0

2017-08-03 Thread Steve Baker
Adding a subject ^^ On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Steve Baker wrote: > > I would like to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the upper > > constraints of the python-paunch library/tool in

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] nominate Aditi Sharma to Watcher Core group

2017-08-03 Thread Hidekazu Nakamura
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Чадин Александр (Alexander Chadin) > [mailto:a.cha...@servionica.ru] > Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 9:48 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [watcher]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

2017-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-04 08:56:17 +1000: > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:04:52AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Tony Breeds's message of 2017-08-03 12:43:04 +1000: > > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:00:22AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Dmitry

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][release][requirements][tripleo]

2017-08-03 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Steve Baker wrote: > I would like to request a Feature Freeze Exemption (FFE) for the upper > constraints of the python-paunch library/tool in Pike. > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490287/ > > TripleO recently switched from using paunch as a

[openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Nomination

2017-08-03 Thread Kevin Benton
Hello! I would like to nominate myself as PTL for the Neutron project for the Queens cycle. I served as the Neutron PTL for the Pike cycle, have been a core reviewer since Kilo, and have been contributing since Havana. I have a few new goals I would like to focus on during the Queens cycle. *

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][FFE] DVR support for Allowed_address_pair port that are bound to multiple ACTIVE VM ports

2017-08-03 Thread Swaminathan Vasudevan
Hi PTL/all,I would like to request an exception for inclusion of https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1583694for Pike. This fix contained two patches one for server side and the other for the agent side. The server side patch had already merged, but the agent side patch is yet to merge but

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

2017-08-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 05:33:46PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > this would mean that depends-on does not work anymore - if you update > the upper-constraint file and want to test, you can use depends-on today. > > with uploading to tarballs, this will not work, As Jeremy pointed out this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptl][stable][release] stable/pike branches created for most libraries

2017-08-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 07:22:15PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > OK, I see. I was assuming we would just tie it to series name, and > that series name could be taken from the .gitreview file or something. > So the URL calculation would always be done locally, and we wouldn't > need any sort of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][release][requirements][tripleo] FFE for python-paunch-1.5.0

2017-08-03 Thread Tony Breeds
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:41:21AM +1200, Steve Baker wrote: > Adding a subject ^^ > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Steve Baker wrote: > > > I would like to request a Feature Freeze Exemption

[openstack-dev] [monasca] Stable branch for Pike

2017-08-03 Thread witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com
Hello Monasca team, Following the Pike release schedule I would like to cut the stable branch for Pike release early next week. We will use it to create the final release at the end of August. Please let me know of release-critical bugs which should be merged before. Cheers Witek

Re: [openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

2017-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com's message of 2017-08-03 11:39:47 +: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to ask for the FFE for python-monascaclient version in global > requirements. > > The current version in Pike (1.7.0) is not fully backward compatible. The > monasca exception

Re: [openstack-dev] [monasca] Stable branch for Pike

2017-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com's message of 2017-08-03 13:27:14 +: > Hello Monasca team, > > Following the Pike release schedule I would like to cut the stable branch for > Pike release early next week. We will use it to create the final release at > the end of August. > >

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Queens PTL candidacy

2017-08-03 Thread Antoni Segura Puimedon
Hi fellow kuryrs! I present my PTL candidacy for the Queens Cycle. We've done well in this past cycle getting close to our first release adding things like: - Kubernetes service support, - Token authentication support, - A lot of devstack improvements like multinode - pod-in-VM neutron trunk and

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

2017-08-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Welcome to our regular release countdown email! Development Focus - Focus should be on the last Pike release-critical bugs, in order to produce the first Pike release candidates sometimes during the week. General Information --- We are at the point in the cycle

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-3, Aug 4 - Aug 11

2017-08-03 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-08-03 15:03:59 +0200: > Actions > --- > > Deliverables following the cycle-with-milestones model should post a RC1 > openstack/releases request during the week (X.0.0.0rc1), together with a > stable/pike branch request. It should include

[openstack-dev] [ffe][requirements][monasca][heat][watcher][congress] FFE for python-monascaclient minimum version in g-r

2017-08-03 Thread witold.be...@est.fujitsu.com
Hello everyone, I would like to ask for the FFE for python-monascaclient version in global requirements. The current version in Pike (1.7.0) is not fully backward compatible. The monasca exception classes were replaced with keystoneauth exceptions, which affects heat and watcher projects if

[openstack-dev] [Mogan] Queens PTL candidacy

2017-08-03 Thread Zhenguo Niu
Hi all, I would like to announce my candidacy for the Mogan PTL for the Queens cycle. Although Mogan is not an official project yet, we seek to complete the PTL election with everyone’s consensus like others. I have been the elected PTL since Mogan was an idea. I think that Mogan serves an

[openstack-dev] [magnum] spec for cluster federation

2017-08-03 Thread Ricardo Rocha
Hi. We've recently started looking at federating kubernetes clusters, using some of our internal Magnum clusters and others deployed in external clouds. With kubernetes 1.7 most of the functionality we need is already available. Looking forward we submitted a spec to integrate this into Magnum:

  1   2   >