Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 01:38:03PM -0500, Ed Leafe wrote: > In the past year or so, has there been anything that made you think “I wish > the TC would do something about that!” ? If so, what was it, and what would > you have wanted the TC to do about it? > > -- Ed Leafe > No, I've been happy

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:42:46PM -0700, Clay Gerrard wrote: > I like a representative democracy. It mostly means I get a say in which > other people I have to trust to think deeply about issues which effect me > and make decisions which I agree (more or less) are of benefit to the > social

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul v3 Rollout Update - devstack-gate issues edition

On 10/12/2017 04:28 PM, Ian Wienand wrote: - logs issues Should be behind us. The logs partition ran out of inodes, causing log upload failures. Pruning jobs should have rectified this. This time it's true :) But please think about this with your jobs, and don't upload hundreds of little

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 1:12 AM, Clay Gerrard wrote: > I like a representative democracy. It mostly means I get a say in which > other people I have to trust to think deeply about issues which effect me > and make decisions which I agree (more or less) are of benefit to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:51:10PM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: > (Reminder: we are in the TC election campaigning period, and we all have the > opportunity to question the candidates. The campaigning period ends on > Saturday, so make with the questions.) > > > In my head, I have a mental picture

[openstack-dev] [horizon]

Hi Horizon Folks, After the PTG I'm back from vacation and I'd like to ask for reviews for bp/neutron-trunk-ui: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:bp/neutron-trunk-ui When you'll hit that link you'll see a Jenkins-1 on some of the patches, but please don't be put off by that. We

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Changes in meetings now in application!

Hello everyone, From this week on, openstack-ansible will meet in the #openstack-ansible channel, every Tuesday, 16:00 UTC. No meeting will happen on Thursdays anymore. The community meeting would happen the last Tuesday of the month, the bug triages are kept the rest of the time. Keep also in

[openstack-dev] [summit] Call for mentors (and mentees) for Speed Mentoring in Sydney

Hello, We are so pleased to again offer Speed Mentoring on the first day of the Sydney summit. We're looking for mentors of all types who can join us for lunch. Please consider taking a few hours to help out and give advice to people new and not so new to the community. Speed

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [ocata] nova-api error 404 instance not found

On 10/12/2017 6:56 AM, Kim-Norman Sahm wrote: You're right. i've used the "old" wsgi based nova api. after switch to nova-api binary is looks fine. Thanks Kim Great. I think we should probably delete those old unsupported wsgi files in stable/ocata since they won't work. When they were

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Role maturity downgrades: Looking for contributions/maintainers

Hello everyone, With our role maturity guidelines now in place [1], we can now start the maturity downgrade procedure [2] for the following roles: - monasca [3] - monasca-agent [4] - octavia [5] - searchlight [6] On top of that, the os_freezer role need more love [7], while still in incubated

Re: [openstack-dev] [forum] Draft Schedule - Deadline Oct 13 Friday 20:00 UTC

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:36 AM Thierry Carrez wrote: > Mike Perez wrote: > > [...] > > You have until Friday, October 13th 20:00UTC to let us know of any > > corrections/conflicts. > > Nice work, all! > > A few potential conflicts I detected that we might want to address:

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] bp/neutron-trunk-ui

Sorry for the double post, I forgot the subject. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Bence Romsics wrote: > Hi Horizon Folks, > > After the PTG I'm back from vacation and I'd like to ask for reviews > for bp/neutron-trunk-ui: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] Regarding Horizon panel of Gnoochi/Adoh Services

On Thu, Oct 12 2017, gordon chung wrote: > Sudheer, the other gnocchi devs can correct me if i'm wrong, but > supporting gnocchi in horizon is not on our roadmap. we will go to > grafana route since it's a common monitoring/metric interface. you are > welcome to try to incorporate grafana into

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO/Ansible PTG session

On 11/10/17 12:25 -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: (cross-posting) James and I created this etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-config-download which tracks work in progress for the config download efforts. Please let us know any question on that topic, Thanks, this is useful!

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO CI Squad meeting - Oct 11

Hello, Here’s the highlights from TripleO CI Squad meeting from October 11 - Roles - The Ruck and the Rover will be responsible for any CI problems, so if you have anything related to CI, please contact them. The rest of the team will work on the sprint -

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]How to handle the Jenkins running after patch cherry picked to driverfixes/newton branch

Wow, Notes still doesn't know how to send text. :) I think I parsed out of that that you are having a problem with the unit test job failing on the driverfixes branch. Unfortunately this is a known issue right now. We found deployers want to be able to run unit tests before incorporating fixes

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul v3 Rollout Update - devstack-gate issues edition

On 2017-10-12 16:28:33 +1100 (+1100), Ian Wienand wrote: [...] > - logs issues > > Should be behind us. The logs partition ran out of inodes, causing > log upload failures. Pruning jobs should have rectified this. [...] Just getting caught up now that I have caffeine, but this problem seems to

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-19, October 13-20

Welcome to our regular release countdown email. Development Focus - Team focus should be on spec approval and implementation for priority features. The first Queens milestone is this Thursday, the 19th. While there aren't any OpenStack-wide deadlines for this milestone,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [nova] Looking for feedback on a spec to limit max_count in multi-create requests

On 10/12/2017 4:09 AM, Saverio Proto wrote: Hello Matt, starting 1000 instances in production works for me already. We are on Openstack Newton. I described my configuration here: https://cloudblog.switch.ch/2017/08/28/starting-1000-instances-on-switchengines/ If things blow up for you with

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul v3 Rollout Update - devstack-gate issues edition

Excerpts from Jeremy Stanley's message of 2017-10-12 14:18:38 +: > On 2017-10-12 16:28:33 +1100 (+1100), Ian Wienand wrote: > [...] > > - logs issues > > > > Should be behind us. The logs partition ran out of inodes, causing > > log upload failures. Pruning jobs should have rectified this.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][release][nova-powervm] Release of openstack/nova-powervm failed

Given the gate issues right now, it's probably best to hold off trying to create releases. Excerpts from jenkins's message of 2017-10-12 13:47:41 +: > Build failed. > > - nova-powervm-tarball >

[openstack-dev] [QA] Office Hours report 2017-10-12

Dear all, today we had our first QA office hours. Thanks to everyone who attended and to chandankumar for leading the bug triage. I think it was an hour well spent, we had good discussions about several recent bugs. We will have the next office hours in two weeks from now. The IRC report [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][release][nova-powervm] Release of openstack/nova-powervm failed

Hi Doug, What will we need to do to get this release through after the gating issues are fixed? Thanks, Eric Berglund Doug Hellmann wrote on 10/12/2017 10:08:31 AM: > From: Doug Hellmann > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Date: 10/12/2017

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

On 2017-10-12 09:06:28 + (+), Jesse Pretorius wrote: > On 10/12/17, 8:55 AM, "Thomas Goirand" wrote: [...] > > Also, in the packaging process, there's a few tweaks that are > > necessary for the distro integration. A quick example: in the > > nova package, I've set

[openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-sig/news

Greetings OpenStack community, All the usual attendees of the weekly API-SIG meeting are rather busy, so not a great deal of activity to report from a rather short meeting. Three things of note: * The forum session for the SIG [5] has been approved, see you in Sydney. * There's been some

[openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

(Reminder: we are in the TC election campaigning period, and we all have the opportunity to question the candidates. The campaigning period ends on Saturday, so make with the questions.) In my head, I have a mental picture of who I'm building OpenStack for. When I'm making design decisions I

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] RFC, be more prescriptive in our log collection in CI

Greetings, The upstream log server is overloaded a bit, I think we can help their cause. Please review and add comments to this bug [1] Yesterday the following two related patches landed [2], [3] Thank you! [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1723182 [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Zuul v3 Rollout Update - devstack-gate issues edition

On 2017-10-12 11:04:45 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: [...] > Yesterday jeblair asked about deleting some of the docs-old content, > which I took to be about space but if it's about inodes and the log > pruning isn't helping then we could do some partial cleanup if it would > help. > > What

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] TC non-candidacy

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: [...] > Thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for the trust you have placed in me. > I look forward to seeing as many of you as I can in Sydney, Vancouver, > Berlin and who knows where else. Thanks for all your extreme

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][release][nova-powervm] Release of openstack/nova-powervm failed

The simplest thing to do will be to re-tag the same commit with a new version number that increments the patch level (the z in x.y.z). Excerpts from Eric S Berglund's message of 2017-10-12 10:48:44 -0500: > Hi Doug, > > What will we need to do to get this release through after the gating >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Release-job-failures][release][nova-powervm] Release of openstack/nova-powervm failed

On 2017-10-12 13:39:22 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > The simplest thing to do will be to re-tag the same commit with a new > version number that increments the patch level (the z in x.y.z). [...] Once things stabilize enough that the jobs have some hope of running to completion, I'm happy

[openstack-dev] [all][tc][election] TC Election Campaigning Period

Developers,     The TC Election Campaigning Period started about 19 hours ago (1).  During the next couple days, you are all encouraged to ask the candidates questions about their platforms (2), opinions on OpenStack, community governance, and anything else that will help you to better

[openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

In the past year or so, has there been anything that made you think “I wish the TC would do something about that!” ? If so, what was it, and what would you have wanted the TC to do about it? -- Ed Leafe __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

Hi Zane, Thank you for your question. I think you're raising a critical question which we must all come to (fairly relative) agreement to so that we can all build OpenStack in the same direction. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > (Reminder: we are in

[openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

I like a representative democracy. It mostly means I get a say in which other people I have to trust to think deeply about issues which effect me and make decisions which I agree (more or less) are of benefit to the social groups in which I participate. When I vote IRL I like to consider voting

Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] Question about vitrage workings.

Hi Paul, Vitrage is supposed to be automatically updated when a VM is deleted from Nova. There are a few issues I would check in your case. 1. You said that you were using vitrage 1.3.1. The Newton version of vitrage is 1.3.0, there is no 1.3.1 version. Maybe you meant vitrage-dashboard

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > In the past year or so, has there been anything that made you think “I wish > the TC would do something about that!” ? If so, what was it, and what would > you have wanted the TC to do about it? I've been part of the TC during

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

Replying on top of Mohammed, since I like his answer and want to add some comments. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote: [...] > Ideally, I think that OpenStack should be targeted to become a core > infrastructure tool that's part of organizations all

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Sydney Forum Project Onboarding Rooms

On 10/9/2017 4:24 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: Wanted to keep this thread towards the top of inboxes for those I haven't heard from yet. About a 1/4 of the way booked, so there are still slots available! -Kendall (diablo_rojo) I've tricked the following people into running a Nova on-boarding

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote: [...] > To candidates: > > Would you please self select a change (or changes) from > https://github.com/openstack/governance/ in the past ~12 mo or so where they > thought the outcome or the discussion/process was

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Sydney Forum Project Onboarding Rooms

Added Nova to my list with Dan, Melanie, and Ed as speakers. Thanks Matt, -Kendall (diablo_rojo) On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:43 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 10/9/2017 4:24 PM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > > Wanted to keep this thread towards the top of inboxes for those I > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > The vision exercise was, in my opinion, one of the more exciting > things we have done in 2017. > Yeah for sure, that was a big goings-on. It's not an easy thing to do because of our diverses opinions, but >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

I ment to include reference back to (what I believe) was the original work: On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Emilien Macchi > wrote: > >> >> The vision exercise was, in my opinion, one of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote: > I ment to include reference back to (what I believe) was the original work: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453262/ __ OpenStack Development

[openstack-dev] [ironic] How is the interface for tftpboot server typically configured on OVS ?

Hey, We are in the process of integrating OpenStack Ironic into our own OpenStack Distribution. One of the areas that we cannot find a good description of is: How is the interface for the tftpboot server typically configured on OVS ? i.e. · i know tftpboot server runs on the same

[openstack-dev] Regarding Multi-Factor Authentication

Hi All, The OpenStack login screen has just login name and password for validation. Now, if someone writes a script to perform DoS attacks by sending a lot of fake login requests, the server will easily become unavailable. I know there is a section in the security page which talks about

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

That's one of the points I mentioned in my candidacy: whom we're building the software for. As a service maintainer and upstream developer of a public cloud based on OpenStack, I would say some times we're mixing the term 'users'. The user in OpenStack world includes *operators* and *tenant users*

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

I slightly disagree. I think there are 3 sets of users not 2... Operators, Tenant Users, and Tenant Application Developers. Tenant Application Developers develop software that the Tenant Users deploy in their tenant. Most OpenStack developers consider the latter two to always be the same

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

On 12/10/17 15:07, Mohammed Naser wrote: Hi Zane, Thank you for your question. I think you're raising a critical question which we must all come to (fairly relative) agreement to so that we can all build OpenStack in the same direction. On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:51 PM, Zane Bitter

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

We're on the same page. I was just not sure if I should go to far away given we're even mixing all the 'users' now. And I think it's related to the other point I mentioned in my candidacy: Constellation. User could be defined by user case, which is the constellation here composed by different

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

On 12/10/17 19:43, Fox, Kevin M wrote: I slightly disagree. I think there are 3 sets of users not 2... Operators, Tenant Users, and Tenant Application Developers. Tenant Application Developers develop software that the Tenant Users deploy in their tenant. Most OpenStack developers consider

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Sydney Forum Project Onboarding Rooms

Hi Kendall, Kolla project would like to have a on-boarding session too. thanks. On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 5:58 AM, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Added Nova to my list with Dan, Melanie, and Ed as speakers. > > Thanks Matt, > -Kendall (diablo_rojo) > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] TC Candidates: what does an OpenStack user look like?

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: > On 12/10/17 15:07, Mohammed Naser wrote: >> >> Hi Zane, >> >> Thank you for your question. I think you're raising a critical >> question which we must all come to (fairly relative) agreement to so >> that we can all build

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Clay Gerrard wrote: > [...] > >> To candidates: >> >> Would you please self select a change (or changes) from >> https://github.com/openstack/governance/ in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > In the past year or so, has there been anything that made you think “I wish > the TC would do something about that!” ? If so, what was it, and what would > you have wanted the TC to do about it? This is great and the timing of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

One thing I wish the TC could do in the past years or so is using their "power" to help to push a more integrated/collaborative OpenStack. Though some(all) TC members may think they don't have the power. On 13/10/17 07:38, Ed Leafe wrote: > In the past year or so, has there been anything that

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Sydney Forum Project Onboarding Rooms

Hello, Kendall, Tricircle would like to have an on-boarding session too, if there is still time slot left and not conflict with other my three sessions: ( Mon 6 , 1:55pm-2:15pm, Tricircle - Project Update; Mon 6 , 1:55pm-2:15pm, Move mission critical application to multi-site, what we learned;

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Oct 12, 2017, at 8:10 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > I think that the OpenStack infrastructure team is doing a wonderful > job at keeping such a huge CI system working to the best of their > effort, however, I think that there needs to be a stronger > relationship between

[openstack-dev] [gnocchi] Redis for storage backend

Hi all, I see the latest Gnocchi support using Redis as a storage backend, I am testing performance of Redis and Ceph, it seems using Redis as storage backend we can achieve more realtime metric data, gnocchi status shows there is always few metric to process. Is Redis a recommend storage

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][election] Question for the candidates

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:10 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Oct 12, 2017, at 8:10 PM, Mohammed Naser wrote: > >> I think that the OpenStack infrastructure team is doing a wonderful >> job at keeping such a huge CI system working to the best of their >> effort,

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

On 10/11/2017 01:17 PM, Jesse Pretorius wrote: > On 10/10/17, 9:26 PM, "Doug Hellmann" wrote: > >> I still think we should just be looking at these files as sample >> data and not active configuration files when we put them into the sdist >> or wheel. > > There is

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging][all] Sample Config Files in setup.cfg

On 10/12/17, 8:55 AM, "Thomas Goirand" wrote: > Now, there's something which I still am not completely sure. Are you > willing to push for *samples*, or real configuration files which we can > actually use? Depending on your answer, the destination location will be > different,

[openstack-dev] Regarding Horizon panel of Gnoochi/Adoh Services

Hello All, I have some queries regarding horizon support for gnoochi/adoh services, As you may all already aware that Resource Usage panel which displays ceilometer service is no longer available from ocata cycle. So i would like to know if there is any plan/blue print to create a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [forum] Draft Schedule - Deadline Oct 13 Friday 20:00 UTC

Mike Perez wrote: > [...] > You have until Friday, October 13th 20:00UTC to let us know of any > corrections/conflicts. Nice work, all! A few potential conflicts I detected that we might want to address: 11/8 11:00-11:40 I know a number of people who will want to attend both the "Ironic vs.

[openstack-dev] [forum] Draft Schedule - Deadline Oct 13 Friday 20:00 UTC

The OpenStack Forum Committee is pleased to present the draft of our Forum schedule! I can attest that the discussions were pretty intense, as we went 2.5 hours over our original meeting time. Thanks again to the committee for the patience and putting in the time to make sure our community is

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][middleware]: Use encrypted password in the service conf file

Thanks, will look forward for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454897/ Regards, Kanthi Pavuluri On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > This sounds like something that was discussed during the PTG. The oslo > team was exploring ways to implement this,

Re: [openstack-dev] l2gw

Hi, I copy here the answer from Maruti Haridas Kamat (part of the team which originally designed networking-l2gw) to the question why this was originally designed this way (no update is possible if there is an active connection on the gw): " I understand your use case, and we thought about

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][quickstart][rdo] shipping python-virtualbmc in Newton to allow undercloud upgrades from Newton to Queens

On 05-10-17 09:57:26, Lee Yarwood wrote: > On 05-10-17 09:33:29, Steven Hardy wrote: >> This sounds reasonable to me, but note another option for testing >> fast-forward overcloud upgrades would be to deploy a trunk/pike >> undercloud, then use it to deploy a newton overcloud (use newton >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Update on Zuul v3 Migration - and what to do about issues

Hi David, Jeremy, Thank you for replying! (And, sorry to sent a mail about nodepool to this email thread.) Your advice is so helpful. I retry to configure nodepool according to your advice. Best regards, On 2017/10/11 22:38, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2017-10-11 08:13:44 -0400 (-0400), David

Re: [openstack-dev] Regarding Horizon panel of Gnoochi/Adoh Services

2017-10-12 18:09 GMT+09:00 Sudheer Kalla : > Hello All, > > I have some queries regarding horizon support for gnoochi/adoh services, As > you may all already aware that Resource Usage panel which displays > ceilometer service is no longer available from ocata cycle. So i

[openstack-dev] [cinder]How to handle the Jenkins running after patch cherry picked to driverfixes/newton branch

  Hi all, I have a question about the Jenkins running after the patch is cherry picked to driverfixes/newton branch.The driver related patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/308882/ was merged into Ocata release and it was already contained in driverfixes/ocata, stable/ocata etc. Now I do a cherry

Re: [openstack-dev] Regarding Horizon panel of Gnoochi/Adoh Services

On 12/10/17 07:05 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Horizon supports plugin mechanism and the horizon team encourage > individual project teams > to develop their GUI support under the governance of their project teams. > There are many examples of horizon plugins [1] interesting, didn't know there

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Looking for help: bug triage meeting organiser

Hello everyone, I'd be very happy if someone can take over the bug triage czar duty, and report it in our community meeting end of each month. It doesn't take too much time in itself (preparing a list of bugs before the meeting, having an opinion on them, and attend the bug triage meeting). IMO,