Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dublin PTG format

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Flavio Percoco wrote: > >> Others have raised concerns about being able to properly keep the momentum >> of >> the day going if we adopt the new format. I have to admit that I'm also >> concerned

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dublin PTG format

On 27/11/17 14:21 -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-11-27 11:58:04 +0100: Hi everyone, We are in the final step in the process of signing the contract with the PTG venue. We should be able to announce the location this week ! So it's time to start

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dublin PTG format

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Flavio Percoco wrote: Others have raised concerns about being able to properly keep the momentum of the day going if we adopt the new format. I have to admit that I'm also concerned about this. Switching context every half day may not be ideal. This is the real crux of

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Ansiblize init-runonce script

I think this came up before at one stage. My position is I don't see the need to ansible-ise small shell scripts. init-runonce is currently just an easy to understand sequence of openstack commands provided to help people test/demo their setups. Unless we want to make it more than that, i.e.

[openstack-dev] [docs] Documentation meeting Wednesday

Hi all, The docs meeting will continue tomorrow, Wednesday at 16:00 UTC in #openstack-doc, as scheduled. For more details, and the agenda, see the meeting page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting Cheers, pk

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Community managed tech/dev blog: Call for opinions and ideas

Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 27/11/17 13:14 -0600, Jimmy McArthur wrote: >> >> >> Joshua Harlow wrote: >>> With say an editor that solicits (and backlogs topics and stories >>> and such) various developers/architects at various companies and >>> creates a actually human curated place for developers

[openstack-dev] [oslo] Oslo weekly meeting time has changed!

Oslo folks, As we discussed in last two weekly meeting, we decide adjust the meeting time to let more people join in easier [1]. That means we schedule weekly meeting in chanel #openstack-oslo at UTC 15:00 from next Monday [1] https://review.openstack.org/522740 -- ChangBo Guo(gcb) Community

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Ansiblize init-runonce script

in my opinion, ​ ​ idempotent scrip ​t is very necessary. for several reason - there is already some idempotent logical in the script - it is common that this script failed by wrong configuration, after fix the config, ops will want to run this script again. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:14 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] configuring qemu.conf using puppet or ansible

On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Saravanan KR wrote: >> Hello, >> >> For dpdk in ovs2.8, the default permission of vhost user ports are >> modified from root:root to openvswitch:hugeltbfs. The

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][heat] heat-dashboard is ready for Horizon team's review

Hi Kaz, Good hear the good progress of heat-dashboard. Thanks. I created a blueprint in horizon to track the effort (mainly in horizon side) and assign it to you: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/heat-dashboard-split-out I also left comments in your etherpad. I think it is time to

[openstack-dev] [docs] Summary of Summit docs sessions

Hi all, To keep everybody updated on the recent docs meetups and IRL conversations, I wanted to share a summary of the Sydney Summit docs sessions that I took part in. Though a bit belated, posting it just in time before the next docs meeting this Wednesday.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Community managed tech/dev blog: Call for opinions and ideas

Thierry Carrez wrote: Flavio Percoco wrote: On 27/11/17 13:14 -0600, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Joshua Harlow wrote: With say an editor that solicits (and backlogs topics and stories and such) various developers/architects at various companies and creates a actually human curated place for

[openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Policy Goal Queens-2 Update

Hi all, As Queens 2 comes to a close next week, I figured it was a good time to recap the policy goal [0]. The following is the breakdown of where projects stand with how I've been tracking things. * Not Started** * openstack/ceilometer openstack/congress openstack/networking-bgpvpn

[openstack-dev] [tc] [all] TC Report 48

https://anticdent.org/tc-report-48.html> Due to the recent Summit in Sydney, related travel, and Thanksgiving, it has been a while since I put a TC Report together. It is hard to get back in the groove. Much of the recent discussion has either been reflecting on Summit-initiated discussions or

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Status of adding global-req-id support in neutron

Hi Neutron devs, This is regarding adding global-req-id support in Neutron projects. Below is the spec and URL for reference: spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/464746/ status of patches submitted: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/message:I65de8261746b25d45e105394f4eeb95b9cb3bd42 Is anyone

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Policy Goal Queens-2 Update

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > Hi all, > > As Queens 2 comes to a close next week, I figured it was a good time to > recap the policy goal [0]. The following is the breakdown of where projects > stand with how I've been tracking things. > > Not

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Policy Goal Queens-2 Update

We have quite a bit in progress already. The following are little things people can do that make a big difference, outside of picking up the implementation for a given project: - Reviews are huge. If we can get things reviewed and +1'd from a goal perspective (e.g. does this meet the

Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] connection to external network

Hi colleagues, found the solution, it need to be done manually. No corresponding Octavia configuration responsible for this. Everything works, thank you :-) On 11/27/17 11:30 AM, Volodymyr Litovka wrote: Hello colleagues, I think I'm missing something architectural in LBaaS / Octavia,

[openstack-dev] [ironic] networking-generic-switch core team update

Hello Ironic! Recently networking-generic-switch was added to OpenStack baremetal program [0]. And I would like to announce n-g-s core team changes: * add ironic-core to n-g-s-core as it is done for other ironic sub-projects * add mgoddard to n-g-s-core team as his reviews/commits are very

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Tripleo CI Community meeting tomorrow

Hello We are going to have a TripleO CI Community meeting tomorrow 11/29/2017 at 1 pm UTC time. The meeting is going to happen on BlueJeans [1] and also on IRC on #tripleo channel. After that, we will hold Office Hours starting at 4PM UTC in case someone from community have any questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Ansiblize init-runonce script

For what its worth, this init-runonce script was never meant for production usage. Ops *shouldn't* be running it like you suggest. It was historically for use in the gate and a quick-n-dirty environment setup for testing. If you want to get into writing operations scripts, thats your

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] feedback on OPNFV test tools and extreme testing

Hi Georg, I am working with Sampath on extreme testing. Have not had a chance to look at the tools past the cursory glance through the documents. It is however on my list to do a complete eval of them. Thanks, Gautam. On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 2:49 AM, Georg Kunz wrote:

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ui][ux] Manage Roles UI Design

Hi All, I've put together a set of designs as we are starting to discuss how a user should be able to manage the roles in a deployment plan. I'd love to hear if anyone has any feedback on this direction! 1) The user can choose to "Manage Role" in order to get the Roles panel into an edit mode:

[openstack-dev] [shade][sdk] Retiring #openstack-shade IRC channel - come join #openstack-sdks

With the adoption of python-openstacksdk into the shade team and the merging of the shade code into the python-openstacksdk codebase, having both an #openstack-shade and an #openstack-sdks channel is more confusing than helpful. [0] To solve that, I'd like to shift shade-related development

Re: [openstack-dev] nova diagnostics in client library/SDK

On 11/03/2017 11:31 AM, Gordon, Kent S wrote: Do any of the python client libraries implement the nova diagnostics API? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova_VM_Diagnostics Not to my knowledge, no. However, adding support for it should be easy enough to accomplish and would be a welcome

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dublin PTG format

On 11/28/2017 3:46 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, Flavio Percoco wrote: Others have raised concerns about being able to properly keep the momentum of the day going if we adopt the new format. I have to admit that I'm also concerned about this. Switching context every half day may

[openstack-dev] [charms] evolving the ha interface type

Hi James, The side effect of using JSON is that we will lose type information: In [0]: json.loads(json.dumps([{1: 2}])) Out[0]: [{'1': 2}] In [1]: ast.literal_eval(repr([{1: 2}])) Out[1]: [{1: 2}] This is a hard requirement in the JSON spec: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7159#section-4 "An

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] feedback on OPNFV test tools and extreme testing

Hi Gautam, Thanks for the update. Just reach out to me if you need further infos, contact persons, support, etc. Best regards Georg From: Gautam Divgi [mailto:gautamdi...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2017 4:59 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

[openstack-dev] PTG Dublin 2018- Registration is Live!

The third Project Teams Gathering will be held February 26-March 2nd at Croke Park in Dublin, Ireland! Registration, Travel Support Program, discounted hotel block, and sponsorships are now live! REGISTRATION AND HOTEL Registration is now available here: https://rockyptg.eventbrite.com

[openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Community Goals for Rocky

Hi everyone, It's time to plan what goals we would like to achieve during the Rocky cycle. If you're not familiar with goals, I suggest this reading first: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/ Chandan and Lance did an more-than-awesome work in championing the 2 goals for Queens cycle, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [oaktree] Follow up to Multi-cloud Management in OpenStack Summit session

On 2017-11-28 15:20:10 -0600 (-0600), Monty Taylor wrote: [...] > To be fair, Jay Pipes and I tried to push OpenStack to use > Protobuf instead of JSON for service-to-service communication back > in 2010 - so it's not ACTUALLY a new idea... but with Google > pushing it and support from the CNCF,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Community managed tech/dev blog: Call for opinions and ideas

On 10:45 Nov 28, Jimmy McArthur wrote: > Thierry Carrez wrote: > > > >What Josh wants is a curated technical blog, so if we reused blog.o.o > >for this (and I think it's a good idea), we'd likely want to have a bit > >more rules on what's appropriate. > > Agreed. It's almost solely used for

[openstack-dev] [trove] Changes to the Trove core team

I would like to announce the following changes to the Trove core reviewers: +jian.song -mariamj Mariam has moved on to other projects and unfortunately has not been able to contribute recently. Jian Song has been an active contributor/reviewer for the last few cycles. - Manoj

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Community managed tech/dev blog: Call for opinions and ideas

Please feel free to reach out to me if you're interested in contributing and/or playing editor. I'll be happy to get anyone that needs it a login. Cheers, Jimmy Mike Perez wrote: On 10:45 Nov 28, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Thierry Carrez wrote: What Josh wants is a curated technical blog, so if

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][heat] heat-dashboard is ready for Horizon team's review

Hi Akihiro, Thanks for your quick response! As you requested, we will check & update your patch to slit out heat support from Horizon repo. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523402/ Also replied for your comment in our etherpad, please kindly check.

Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Questions about Caas with Magnum

Can you help explain or point me to more information about your comments on this: "For RBAC, you need 1.8 and with Pike you can get it. just by changing one parameter." I checked the repo on github and RBAC was referenced only in a comment. No labels. What parameter? "In fedora atomic 27

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Ansiblize init-runonce script

yes. it is not ​recommend to use in prod env, i never used this script. But the reality is lots users are using it, at least in the test environment. and there are patches trying to make this script ​ idempotent ​ recently.​ 2017年11月28日 23:28，"Sam Yaple" 写道： > For what its worth,

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] evolving the ha interface type

On 11/28/2017 01:50 PM, Dmitrii Shcherbakov wrote: Hi James, The side effect of using JSON is that we will lose type information: In [0]: json.loads(json.dumps([{1: 2}])) Out[0]: [{'1': 2}] In [1]: ast.literal_eval(repr([{1: 2}])) Out[1]: [{1: 2}] I'm not sure this is really an issue for

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dublin PTG format

On 11/28, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > Mon-Tue/Wed-Fri works as most suitable format. There are always > conflict for many of us but that can be adjusted by working with team > planning. > > Another thing can help is to give flexibility to team to have team > topic even on Mon-Tue, which mean team

[openstack-dev] [oaktree] Follow up to Multi-cloud Management in OpenStack Summit session

Hey everybody! https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sydney-forum-multi-cloud-management I've CC'd everyone who listed interest directly, just in case you're not already on the openstack-dev list. If you aren't, and you are in fact interested in this topic, please subscribe and make sure to watch

[openstack-dev] [qa] feedback on OPNFV test tools and extreme testing

Hi guys, I wanted to come back to you regarding conversion we had in Sydney about the OPNFV tools. I am curious about your thoughts on tools such as Yardstick (and Functest) and in which way they meet or do not meet your requirements for extreme testing. In case you found the time to look at

[openstack-dev] Creating an instance with specified subNet via Dashboard

Dears, I cretaed a network with 2 sub-networks. Now, I want to create an instance and specify that this instance should get an adsress from the second sub-network. I am using the Dashboard but I do not know how to make this preference ? Currently I have found some links (below) but all of them

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Dublin PTG format

On 27/11/17 11:58 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, We are in the final step in the process of signing the contract with the PTG venue. We should be able to announce the location this week ! So it's time to start preparing. We'll have 5 days, like in Denver. One thing we'd like to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Community managed tech/dev blog: Call for opinions and ideas

On 27/11/17 13:14 -0600, Jimmy McArthur wrote: Joshua Harlow wrote: With say an editor that solicits (and backlogs topics and stories and such) various developers/architects at various companies and creates a actually human curated place for developers and technology and architecture to be

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] required changes on existing devstacks

Hi, Due to the latest changes of the event persistor service in Vitrage[1], there is a need to run vitrage-dbsync on any existing devstack: · Pull the latest changes of vitrage (if you pulled yesterday you should pull again) · Run: vitrage-dbsync [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [oaktree] Follow up to Multi-cloud Management in OpenStack Summit session

On 11/28/2017 06:05 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > So just curious. > > I didn't think shade had any federation logic in it; so I assume it will > start getting some? It's possible that we're missing each other on the definition of the word 'federation' ... but shade's entire purpose in life is to

Re: [openstack-dev] [oaktree] Follow up to Multi-cloud Management in OpenStack Summit session

Monty Taylor wrote: On 11/28/2017 06:05 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > So just curious. > > I didn't think shade had any federation logic in it; so I assume it will > start getting some? It's possible that we're missing each other on the definition of the word 'federation' ... but shade's

Re: [openstack-dev] [oaktree] Follow up to Multi-cloud Management in OpenStack Summit session

So just curious. I didn't think shade had any federation logic in it; so I assume it will start getting some? Has there been any prelim. design around what the APIs of this would be and how they would work and how they would return data from X other clouds in a uniform manner? (I'd really

Re: [openstack-dev] [oaktree] Follow up to Multi-cloud Management in OpenStack Summit session

Small side-question, Why would this just be limited to openstack clouds? Would it be? Monty Taylor wrote: Hey everybody! https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/sydney-forum-multi-cloud-management I've CC'd everyone who listed interest directly, just in case you're not already on the openstack-dev