[openstack-dev] [Senlin] [PTL] PTL nomination for Senlin

2018-01-31 Thread liu.xuefeng1
Hi all I'd like to announce my candidacy for the PTL role of Senlin Project for Rocky cycle. I began to contribute to Senlin project since Mitaka and joined the team as a core reviewer in 2016.10. It is my pleasure to work with the great team to make this project better and better, and we

[openstack-dev] [ironic] ansible deploy, playbooks and containers?

2018-01-31 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
Hi all, I'd like to discuss one idea that came to me while trying to use the ansible deploy in TripleO. The ansible deploy interface is all about customization. Meaning, we expect people to modify the playbooks. I have two concerns with it: 1. Nearly any additions requires a full copy of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ansible deploy, playbooks and containers?

2018-01-31 Thread Mark Goddard
I like the swift/HTTP proposal. In kayobe we've considered how to customise the deployment process, with hook points [1] looking like the right approach. Another possibility when deploy steps [2] land could be to break up the ansible deployment into multiple steps, and allow each step to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][PTL] Nomination for Glance PTL for Rocky cycle

2018-01-31 Thread Abhishek Kekane
All the best Erno, Long may you reign ;) Abhishek On 31-Jan-2018 18:38, "Erno Kuvaja" wrote: > Hi all, > > After lengthy discussions and careful thinking I have thrown my name > into the hat for Glance PTL. You can find my thoughts from the > candidacy patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder for todays meeting

2018-01-31 Thread Jean-Daniel Bonnetot
Hi, For me it's not the best time frame. A have a weekly meeting on that time. Is it possible to move our weekly meeting 30min later ? If it's not possible for this meeting, maybe it's doable for the next ones? Jean-Daniel Bonnetot ovh.com | @pilgrimstack On 31 Jan 2018, at

[openstack-dev] [glance] FFE request for --check feature

2018-01-31 Thread Shewale, Bhagyashri
Hi Glance Folks, I'm requesting an Feature Freeze Exception for the lite-spec http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/glance-specs/specs/untargeted/glance/lite-spec-db-sync-check.html which is implemented by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/455837/8/ Regards, Bhagyashri Shewale

[openstack-dev] [masakari] [Release-job-failures] Tag of openstack/masakari failed

2018-01-31 Thread Sean McGinnis
Masakari had a release job fail for publishing the release notes. It appears to be due to the release notes not being updated to follow the latest requirements with the changes that were done in the zuul job. There is an outstanding patch in openstack/masakari that should fix this:

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] FFE Request for Queens

2018-01-31 Thread Lajos Katona
Thanks Akihiro I will bring it up on today's meeting. Regards Lajos On 2018-01-31 10:39, Akihiro Motoki wrote: +1 for FFE. I can support it. We need a final ack from our PTL. Akihiro 2018-01-30 5:13 GMT+09:00 Lajos Katona : Hi, I would like to ask for FFE on the

[openstack-dev] [qa][all] QA Office Hours on 01st Feb, 2018

2018-01-31 Thread Chandan kumar
Hello All, a kind reminder that tomorrow at 9:00 UTC we'll start office hours for the QA team in the #openstack-qa channel. Please join us with any question/comment you may have related to tempest plugin split community goal, tempest and others QA tools. We'll triage bugs for QA projects from

Re: [openstack-dev] [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder for todays meeting

2018-01-31 Thread Zhipeng Huang
shall we cancel the meeting for today then ? On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Tobias Rydberg wrote: > Hi, > > It's maybe time for a new doodle about bi-weekly meeting ... potentially > also about going to weekly meeting? > > Personally I'm fine with morning times as well,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] LTS pragmatic example

2018-01-31 Thread Saverio Proto
> You seem to be interested in a policy shift toward more of a "bugfix" > branch where any fix should be allowed to land, and where branch age > should not be a factor. It would be interesting to assess if that is a > general view. I know that distros in general are happy with more of a > "stable"

Re: [openstack-dev] [masakari] [Release-job-failures] Tag of openstack/masakari failed

2018-01-31 Thread Sam P
Hi Sean, Thanks for the advice. Above fix has merged. --- Regards, Sampath On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 9:39 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > Masakari had a release job fail for publishing the release notes. It > appears to > be due to the release notes not being updated to

[openstack-dev] [keystone] [ptl] PTL candidacy for Rocky

2018-01-31 Thread Lance Bragstad
Hey folks, I'm writing to express my interest in continuing to serve as keystone's PTL for the Rocky release. Even though we're a few weeks away from an official Queens release, I felt we had an extremely productive cycle. The outcome of the Queens PTG in Denver was nothing short of ambitious.

Re: [openstack-dev] [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder for todays meeting

2018-01-31 Thread Tobias Rydberg
Hi, It's maybe time for a new doodle about bi-weekly meeting ... potentially also about going to weekly meeting? Personally I'm fine with morning times as well, if that is better for more people. Tobias On 2018-01-31 14:46, Jean-Daniel Bonnetot wrote: Hi, For me it's not the best time

[openstack-dev] [Glance][PTL] Nomination for Glance PTL for Rocky cycle

2018-01-31 Thread Erno Kuvaja
Hi all, After lengthy discussions and careful thinking I have thrown my name into the hat for Glance PTL. You can find my thoughts from the candidacy patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539196/ I'd like to take the opportunity to thank most recently Brian but also our other former PTLs from

[openstack-dev] [nova] Requesting eyes on fix for bug 1686703

2018-01-31 Thread Matthew Booth
Could I please have some eyes on this bugfix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/462521/ . I addressed an issue raised in August 2017, and it's had no negative feedback since. It would be good to get this one finished. Thanks, Matt -- Matthew Booth Red Hat OpenStack Engineer, Compute DFG Phone:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] opendaylight OpenDaylightConnectionProtocol deprecation issue

2018-01-31 Thread Ben Nemec
On 01/29/2018 04:27 AM, Moshe Levi wrote: Hi all, It seem that this commit [1] deprecated the OpenDaylightConnectionProtocol, but it also remove it. This is causing the following issue when we deploy opendaylight non containerized. See [2] One solution is to add back the

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Q-3 milestone released

2018-01-31 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote: [snip] > Glance cores, please do not merge any patches until after > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/536630/ has merged. The patch merged at 08:15UTC today. Merge away (subject to common sense and the fact that

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][masakari] Need help on masakari deliverables

2018-01-31 Thread Sam P
Hi Sean, Thanks. That make sense. I will proceed masakari release as independent for Queens. And will push those patches to Rocky. --- Regards, Sampath On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:30 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 12:19:16AM +0900, Sam P wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Requesting eyes on fix for bug 1686703

2018-01-31 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/31/2018 7:30 AM, Matthew Booth wrote: Could I please have some eyes on this bugfix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/462521/ . I addressed an issue raised in August 2017, and it's had no negative feedback since. It would be good to get this one finished. First, I'd like to avoid setting

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirement][cyborg]FFE - pyspdk requirement dependency

2018-01-31 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2018-01-31 10:44:12 -0600 (-0600), Matthew Thode wrote: [...] > Thanks for the link, and yes should probably just be discussed in a > review. Missing a setup.py/cfg and license and testing all make it seem > like a no-go though. The 0.0.2 sdist on PyPI does contain those, leading me to

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Mathieu Gagné
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > Hey folks, > > The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0] > lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1]. I wanted to start a > discussion with said projects to see how we want to go

[openstack-dev] [release][masakari] Need help on masakari deliverables

2018-01-31 Thread Sam P
Hi release team, I did not realize at the time however, I noticed that masakari does not have any of it deliverables are set for Queens in [1]. Which is my fault and really sorry for that. We currently have 3 deliverables, masakari: repos: - openstack/masakari masakari-monitors:

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ironic] Tagging newton EOL

2018-01-31 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/30/2018 10:17 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi All, When we tagged newton EOL in October there were in-flight reviews for nova and ironic that needed to land before we could EOL them. That work completed but I dropped the ball. So can we tag those last 2 repos? As in October a member of

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][ironic][heat] Do we want a BM/VM room at the PTG?

2018-01-31 Thread Graham Hayes
On 31/01/18 17:22, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 01/31/2018 06:15 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> On 1/30/2018 9:33 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: >>> At the last PTG we had some time on Monday and Tuesday for >>> cross-project discussions related to baremetal and VM management. We >>> don't currently have

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][ironic][heat] Do we want a BM/VM room at the PTG?

2018-01-31 Thread Lance Bragstad
On 01/30/2018 09:33 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: > At the last PTG we had some time on Monday and Tuesday for > cross-project discussions related to baremetal and VM management. We > don't currently have that on the schedule for this PTG. There is still > some free time available that we can ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 01/31/2018 06:23 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: On 01/31/2018 11:20 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: Hi! On 01/31/2018 06:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: Hey folks, The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0] lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1].  I wanted to

[openstack-dev] [sdk][ptl] PTL Candidacy for Rocky

2018-01-31 Thread Monty Taylor
Hi everybody! I'd like to run for PTL of OpenStackSDK again This last cycle was pretty exciting. We merged the shade and openstacksdk projects into a single team. We shifted os-client-config to that team as well. We merged the code from shade and os-client-config into openstacksdk, and then

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirement][cyborg]FFE - pyspdk requirement dependency

2018-01-31 Thread Matthew Thode
On 18-01-31 10:15:12, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from We We's message of 2018-01-31 01:54:04 +0800: > >>> Hi, > >> > >>> I have modified and resubmitted pyspdk to the pypi. Please check it. > >> > >>> Thx, > >> > >>> Helloway > > > > Is there a public source

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
Hi! On 01/31/2018 06:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: Hey folks, The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0] lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1].  I wanted to start a discussion with said projects to see how we want to go about the work in the future, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Pavlo Shchelokovskyy
Lance, that's a single patch renaming the sample policy file from .json to .yaml, so I do not think it is a real blocker. Besides we have another patch on review that deletes those files altogether (and which I like more and there was an ML thread resulting in a decision to indeed remove them).

[openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][neutron-lbaas][octavia] Announcing the deprecation of neutron-lbaas and neutron-lbaas-dashboard

2018-01-31 Thread Michael Johnson
Today we are announcing the start of the deprecation cycle for neutron-lbaas and neutron-lbaas-dashboard. As part of the neutron stadium evolution [1], neutron-lbaas was identified as a project that should spin out of neutron and become its own project. The specification detailing this process was

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][masakari] Need help on masakari deliverables

2018-01-31 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 12:19:16AM +0900, Sam P wrote: > Hi release team, > > I did not realize at the time however, I noticed that masakari does not > have any > of it deliverables are set for Queens in [1]. Which is my fault and really > sorry for that. > > We currently have 3 deliverables,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Kingbird]Multi-Region Orchestrator

2018-01-31 Thread Jay Pipes
On 01/31/2018 01:49 AM, Goutham Pratapa wrote: *Kingbird (The Multi Region orchestrator):* We are proud to announce kingbird is not only a centralized quota and resource-manager but also a  Multi-region Orchestrator. *Use-cases covered: *- Admin can synchronize and periodically balance

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] LTS pragmatic example

2018-01-31 Thread Akihiro Motoki
2018-01-31 17:51 GMT+09:00 Saverio Proto : > Hello all, > > I am again proposing a change due to operations experience. I am > proposing a clean and simple cherry-pick to Ocata. > > "it depends" works pretty bad as policy for accepting patches. > > Now I really dont

[openstack-dev] [docs] how to update published pike docs

2018-01-31 Thread Brian Rosmaita
Hello Docs people, The glance install docs currently published on docs.o.o don't include a correction we merged a while back, and I get a few bug reports filed on this particular problem every week. (It's great that people are willing to file corrections, but the duplicates are really piling

[openstack-dev] [kolla][ptl] PTL Candidacy for Rocky

2018-01-31 Thread Jeffrey Zhang
Hi everyone, I am excited to announce my candidacy for the Rocky cycle as Kolla PTL. Kolla is a fantastic project, which simplifies the lives of operators when managing OpenStack. Now, Kolla can containerize and deliver almost all OpenStack Big Tent projects. And more and more OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Lance Bragstad
Hey folks, The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0] lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1].  I wanted to start a discussion with said projects to see how we want to go about the work in the future, we have a couple of options. I can update the document

[openstack-dev] [relmgt][ptl] Release Management PTL candidacy for Rocky

2018-01-31 Thread Sean McGinnis
Greetings! I would like to submit my name to continue as the release management PTL for the Rocky release. Since starting with Queens I have learned a lot about our release process and all the great automation tooling we have to support that. I've also had to learn a fair bit about zuul and

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][ironic][heat] Do we want a BM/VM room at the PTG?

2018-01-31 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
On 01/31/2018 06:15 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 1/30/2018 9:33 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: At the last PTG we had some time on Monday and Tuesday for cross-project discussions related to baremetal and VM management. We don't currently have that on the schedule for this PTG. There is still some

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] how to update published pike docs

2018-01-31 Thread Jeremy Stanley
On 2018-01-31 12:07:30 -0500 (-0500), Brian Rosmaita wrote: [...] > What do we need to do to get the docs.o.o to show the fixed docs? Is > it something we need to do on the glance side, or does it have to be > fixed somewhere else? Looks like that commit merged toward the end of September, so

Re: [openstack-dev] [security] Security PTG Planning, x-project request for topics.

2018-01-31 Thread Luke Hinds
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Adam Young wrote: > Bug 968696 and System Roles. Needs to be addressed across the Service > catalog. > Thanks Adam, will add it to the list. I see it's been open since 2012! > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 7:38 AM, Luke Hinds

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] how to update published pike docs

2018-01-31 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2018-01-31 18:22, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-01-31 12:07:30 -0500 (-0500), Brian Rosmaita wrote: > [...] >> What do we need to do to get the docs.o.o to show the fixed docs? Is >> it something we need to do on the glance side, or does it have to be >> fixed somewhere else? > > Looks like

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] how to update published pike docs

2018-01-31 Thread Brian Rosmaita
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2018-01-31 18:22, Jeremy Stanley wrote: >> On 2018-01-31 12:07:30 -0500 (-0500), Brian Rosmaita wrote: >> [...] > > That fixed it - thanks, > Yes! Thanks for the quick work. All fixed now!

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ceilometer] versioned notifications coverage

2018-01-31 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/30/2018 11:14 PM, Hanxi Liu wrote: Can I understand it as a trend that versioned notifications will replace unversioned notifications even though versioned notifications may have the only consumer for long time? The long-term goal in nova is to eventually have parity between the

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][ironic][heat] Do we want a BM/VM room at the PTG?

2018-01-31 Thread Jim Rollenhagen
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > On 01/31/2018 06:15 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > >> On 1/30/2018 9:33 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: >> >>> At the last PTG we had some time on Monday and Tuesday for >>> cross-project discussions related to baremetal and

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][ironic][heat] Do we want a BM/VM room at the PTG?

2018-01-31 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/30/2018 9:33 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: At the last PTG we had some time on Monday and Tuesday for cross-project discussions related to baremetal and VM management. We don't currently have that on the schedule for this PTG. There is still some free time available that we can ask for[1].

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Lance Bragstad
On 01/31/2018 11:20 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi! > > On 01/31/2018 06:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: >> Hey folks, >> >> The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0] >> lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1].  I wanted to start a >> discussion with said

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] [infra] how to update published pike docs

2018-01-31 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2018-01-31 18:07, Brian Rosmaita wrote: > Hello Docs people, > > The glance install docs currently published on docs.o.o don't include > a correction we merged a while back, and I get a few bug reports filed > on this particular problem every week. (It's great that people are > willing to

[openstack-dev] [all][infra] Automatically generated Zuul changes (topic: zuulv3-projects)

2018-01-31 Thread James E. Blair
Hi, Occasionally we will make changes to the Zuul configuration language. Usually these changes will be backwards compatible, but whether they are or not, we still want to move things forward. Because Zuul's configuration is now spread across many repositories, it may take many changes to do

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][neutron-lbaas][octavia] Announcing the deprecation of neutron-lbaas and neutron-lbaas-dashboard

2018-01-31 Thread Armando M.
On 31 January 2018 at 09:50, Michael Johnson wrote: > Today we are announcing the start of the deprecation cycle for > neutron-lbaas and neutron-lbaas-dashboard. As part of the neutron > stadium evolution [1], neutron-lbaas was identified as a project that > should spin out

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [glance] [ironic] [neutron] [tacker] [tc] policy in code goal

2018-01-31 Thread Lance Bragstad
On 01/31/2018 11:50 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: > Lance, > > that's a single patch renaming the sample policy file from .json to > .yaml, so I do not think it is a real blocker. > Besides we have another patch on review that deletes those files > altogether (and which I like more and there

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][neutron-lbaas][octavia] Announcing the deprecation of neutron-lbaas and neutron-lbaas-dashboard

2018-01-31 Thread Andreas Jaeger
In that case, I suggest to remove translation jobs for these repositories, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] PTL non candidacy

2018-01-31 Thread Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot)
Thanks for being a great PTL for kolla Michał ☺ You’re not announcing your non-candidacy for drinking with your OpenStack friends and this does not mean we can’t drink together ;) Regards, Vikram Hosakote IRC: vhosakot From: Michał Jastrzębski Reply-To: "OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][nova][ironic][heat] Do we want a BM/VM room at the PTG?

2018-01-31 Thread Colleen Murphy
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 6:46 PM, Graham Hayes wrote: > On 31/01/18 17:22, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >> On 01/31/2018 06:15 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >>> On 1/30/2018 9:33 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: [snip] >>> >>> These all seem like good topics for big cross-project issues. >>> >>> I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Kingbird]Multi-Region Orchestrator

2018-01-31 Thread Goutham Pratapa
Hi Jay, Thanks for the questions.. :) What precisely do you mean by "resources" above ?? Resources as-in resources required to boot-up a vm (Keypair, Image, Flavors ) Also, by "syncing", do you mean "replicating"? The reason I ask is because in the case of, say, VM "resources", you can't

[openstack-dev] [keystone] milestone-3 retrospective

2018-01-31 Thread Lance Bragstad
Hey all, Now that we're past the 3rd milestone, we can step a time to hold a retrospective. Let's shoot for next week during the weekly keystone meeting. We'll get the board cleaned up before then [0]. Thanks, Lance [0] https://trello.com/b/jrpmDKtf/keystone-retrospective signature.asc

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible][ptl] PTL candidacy for Rocky

2018-01-31 Thread Jean-Philippe Evrard
Hello everyone, I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the OpenStack-Ansible project for the Rocky cycle. I will focus on a single theme this cycle, simplification. After all the features introduced in Queens cycle, it's time to simplify our work: * Reduce the amount of variables in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] LTS pragmatic example

2018-01-31 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 1/31/2018 2:51 AM, Saverio Proto wrote: Hello all, I am again proposing a change due to operations experience. I am proposing a clean and simple cherry-pick to Ocata. "it depends" works pretty bad as policy for accepting patches. Now I really dont understand what is the issue with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][neutron-lbaas][octavia] Announcing the deprecation of neutron-lbaas and neutron-lbaas-dashboard

2018-01-31 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Good to hear that! Thanks for your leadership. Thanks, Akihiro Motoki 2018-02-01 2:50 GMT+09:00 Michael Johnson : > Today we are announcing the start of the deprecation cycle for > neutron-lbaas and neutron-lbaas-dashboard. As part of the neutron > stadium evolution [1],

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][neutron-lbaas][octavia] Announcing the deprecation of neutron-lbaas and neutron-lbaas-dashboard

2018-01-31 Thread Akihiro Motoki
I don't think we need to drop translation support NOW (at least for neutron-lbaas-dashboard). There might be fixes which affects translation and/or there might be translation improvements. I don't think a deprecation means no translation fix any more. It sounds too aggressive. Is there any problem

[openstack-dev] [telemetry][heat][mistral][sdk][searchlight][senlin][tacker][tricircle][tripleo] Missing Queens releases

2018-01-31 Thread Sean McGinnis
While reviewing Queens release deliverables and preparing missing stable/queens branches, we have identified several libraries that have not had any Queens releases. In the past, we have stated we would force a release for any missing deliverables in order to have a clear branching point. We

[openstack-dev] [cyborg][ptl]PTL Candidacy for Rocky

2018-01-31 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi Team, I would like to express my interest in continuing to serve as PTL of Cyborg project for Rocky release. I know we have been in a fanatic state for our first release preparation, but when I looked back to the early days when nomad (cyborg's prelife) project kicks off, I feel I'm blessed

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] PTL non candidacy

2018-01-31 Thread Steven Dake (stdake)
Cheers Michal. Thank you for your service. Regards -steve From: Vikram Hosakote Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 1:04 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List

[openstack-dev] [nova] PTL candidacy

2018-01-31 Thread melanie witt
Hello Stackers, I would like to announce my candidacy for Nova PTL in the Rocky cycle. I have been a core reviewer on Nova since May 2015 and have been working with OpenStack since mid 2012 (ancient times!) and you may know me on IRC as melwitt. I have been both a user and a developer on

[openstack-dev] [Karbor] [ptl] PTL candidacy for Rocky

2018-01-31 Thread Chen Ying
Hi all, I would like to nominate myself to be the Karbor PTL for the Rocky cycle. I began to contribute to Karbor project since 2016.01, as a core reviewer from Newton cycle, and as Karbor PTL for the Queens cycle. It is my pleasure to work with the great team to make this project better and

[openstack-dev] [requirements][ptl] Announcing my candidacy for PTL of the requirements project

2018-01-31 Thread Matthew Thode
I would like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the Requirements project for the Rocky cycle. The following will be my goals for the cycle, in order of importance: 1. The primary goal is to keep a tight rein on global-requirements and upper-constraints updates. 2. Speaking of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] Automatically generated Zuul changes (topic: zuulv3-projects)

2018-01-31 Thread Takashi Yamamoto
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:59 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > Occasionally we will make changes to the Zuul configuration language. > Usually these changes will be backwards compatible, but whether they are > or not, we still want to move things forward. > > Because Zuul's

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirement][cyborg]FFE - pyspdk requirement dependency

2018-01-31 Thread Thierry Carrez
Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from We We's message of 2018-01-31 01:54:04 +0800: >>> Hi, >> >>> I have modified and resubmitted pyspdk to the pypi. Please check it. >> >>> Thx, >> >>> Helloway > > Is there a public source repository for the library somewhere? Looks like it lives at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Kingbird]Multi-Region Orchestrator

2018-01-31 Thread Goutham Pratapa
OK, sorry that was a mistake :) Thank you, Thierry :) On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 2:51 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Goutham Pratapa wrote: > > *Kingbird (The Multi Region orchestrator):* > > > > We are proud to announce kingbird is not only a centralized quota and > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [blazar] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/blazar-nova failed

2018-01-31 Thread Thierry Carrez
Masahito MUROI wrote: > Thanks. I push the patch to fix the issue.  Do I need an additional > patch that tags blazar-nova 1.0.1 as I did to blazarclient? I'd say yes. The simplest way for us to properly publish it would be a new version tag once everything is in place. Thanks! -- Thierry

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] LTS pragmatic example

2018-01-31 Thread Saverio Proto
Hello all, I am again proposing a change due to operations experience. I am proposing a clean and simple cherry-pick to Ocata. "it depends" works pretty bad as policy for accepting patches. Now I really dont understand what is the issue with the Stable Policy and this patch:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][Kingbird]Multi-Region Orchestrator

2018-01-31 Thread Thierry Carrez
Goutham Pratapa wrote: > *Kingbird (The Multi Region orchestrator):* > > We are proud to announce kingbird is not only a centralized quota and > resource-manager but also a  Multi-region Orchestrator. > [...] > Thanks > Goutham Pratapa > PTL > OpenStack-Kingbird. Quick clarification: Kingbird is

Re: [openstack-dev] [blazar] [Release-job-failures] Release of openstack/blazar-nova failed

2018-01-31 Thread Masahito MUROI
Hi Sean, Thanks. I push the patch to fix the issue. Do I need an additional patch that tags blazar-nova 1.0.1 as I did to blazarclient? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/539433/ best regards, Masahito On 2018/01/31 7:40, Sean McGinnis wrote: There was a failure with releasing blazar-nova.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] LTS pragmatic example

2018-01-31 Thread Thierry Carrez
Saverio Proto wrote: > Hello all, > > I am again proposing a change due to operations experience. I am > proposing a clean and simple cherry-pick to Ocata. > > "it depends" works pretty bad as policy for accepting patches. > > Now I really dont understand what is the issue with the Stable

[openstack-dev] [acceleration]Cyborg Weekly Team Meeting 2018.01.31

2018-01-31 Thread Zhipeng Huang
Hi Team, Team meeting starting UTC1500 as usual at #openstack-cyborg. We will try to make hell freeze over today :) -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base,

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] FFE Request for Queens

2018-01-31 Thread Akihiro Motoki
+1 for FFE. I can support it. We need a final ack from our PTL. Akihiro 2018-01-30 5:13 GMT+09:00 Lajos Katona : > Hi, > > I would like to ask for FFE on the neutron-trunk-ui blueprint to let the > admin panel for trunks be accepted for Queens. > > Based on discussion

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][oslo.log]Re: Error will be occurred if watch_log_file option is true

2018-01-31 Thread Rikimaru Honjo
Hello, Sorry for the very late reply... On 2018/01/10 1:11, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Rikimaru Honjo's message of 2018-01-09 18:11:09 +0900: Hello, On 2018/01/04 23:12, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Rikimaru Honjo's message of 2018-01-04 18:22:26 +0900: Hello, The below bug

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg] Reminder for todays meeting

2018-01-31 Thread Tobias Rydberg
Hi all, Time again for a meeting for the Public Cloud WG - today at 1400 UTC in #openstack-meeting-3 Agenda and etherpad at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/publiccloud-wg See you later! Tobias Rydberg -- Tobias Rydberg Senior Developer Mobile: +46 733 312780 www.citynetwork.eu |

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][ironic] Tagging newton EOL

2018-01-31 Thread Dmitry Tantsur
Hi! Ironic is ready for newton EOL. On 01/31/2018 05:17 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi All, When we tagged newton EOL in October there were in-flight reviews for nova and ironic that needed to land before we could EOL them. That work completed but I dropped the ball. So can we tag those last

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra] Automatically generated Zuul changes (topic: zuulv3-projects)

2018-01-31 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2018-02-01 05:49, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > [...] >> * Don't create your own versions of these changes. My script will >> eventually upload changes to all affected project-branches. It's >> intentionally a slow process, and attempting to speed it up won't >> help. But if there's

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas][neutron-lbaas][octavia] Announcing the deprecation of neutron-lbaas and neutron-lbaas-dashboard

2018-01-31 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 2018-01-31 22:58, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > I don't think we need to drop translation support NOW (at least for > neutron-lbaas-dashboard). > There might be fixes which affects translation and/or there might be > translation improvements. > I don't think a deprecation means no translation fix any