Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Stein blueprint - Plan to remove Keepalived support (replaced by Pacemaker)

2018-07-16 Thread Michele Baldessari
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:48:51AM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:42 AM Dan Prince wrote: > [...] > > > The biggest downside IMO is the fact that our Pacemaker integration is > > not containerized. Nor are there any plans to finish the > > containerization of it.

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][storyboard] Updates between SB and LP

2018-07-16 Thread Matthew Thode
On 18-07-16 13:12:32, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Hey Tony :) > > So I think the best way to deal with it would to disable bug reporting for > requirements in LP (so nothing new can get filed there and the index won't > be discoverable but you can still edit the old bugs) and then to do > periodic

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-odl] Builds are failing in Stable/pike in networking-odl

2018-07-16 Thread Isaku Yamahata
Hello Vamsikrishna. Carbon snapshot hasn't been build any more and not available from opendaylight nexus server. But the carbon job tried to get carbon snapshot and filed. So the fix is to use latest(and final?) carbon release(carbon SR4) instead of carbon snapshot. Maybe you'd like to twist

Re: [openstack-dev] [requirements][storyboard] Updates between SB and LP

2018-07-16 Thread Kendall Nelson
Hey Tony :) So I think the best way to deal with it would to disable bug reporting for requirements in LP (so nothing new can get filed there and the index won't be discoverable but you can still edit the old bugs) and then to do periodic runs of the migration script to pick up any changes that

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Feature Status and Exceptions

2018-07-16 Thread Colleen Murphy
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, at 9:19 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > Hey all, > > As noted in the weekly report [0], today is feature freeze for > keystone-related specifications. I wanted to elaborate on each > specification so that our plan is clear moving forward. > > *Unified Limits** > ** > *I propose

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Stein blueprint - Plan to remove Keepalived support (replaced by Pacemaker)

2018-07-16 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Hi, On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: > Sounds good to me. Even if pacemaker is heavier, less options and > consistency is better. > > Greetings from Mexico :D Greetings from Poznań :D > > On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, 13:33 Emilien Macchi, wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> We

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] New validation: ensure we actually have enough disk space on the undercloud

2018-07-16 Thread Cédric Jeanneret
On 07/16/2018 12:18 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: >> Dear Stackers, >> >> I'm currently looking for some inputs in order to get a new validation, >> ran as a "preflight check" on the undercloud. >> >> The aim is to ensure we

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-community] Give cinder-backup more CPU resources

2018-07-16 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On 06/07, Amy Marrich wrote: > Hey, > > Forwarding to the Dev list as you may get a better response from there. > > Thanks, > > Amy (spotz) > Hi, I included a good number of improvements regarding bottlenecks on the backup service in recent releases, some of them are automatic, and others need

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] New validation: ensure we actually have enough disk space on the undercloud

2018-07-16 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
Hi, On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 4:45 PM, Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > Dear Stackers, > > I'm currently looking for some inputs in order to get a new validation, > ran as a "preflight check" on the undercloud. > > The aim is to ensure we actually have enough disk space for all the > files and, most

[openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver

2018-07-16 Thread Rambo
Hi,all In the Cinder repository, I noticed that the BlockDeviceDriver driver is being deprecated, and was eventually be removed with the Queens release. https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/stable/ocata/cinder/volume/drivers/block_device.py In my use case, the instances using

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver

2018-07-16 Thread Rambo
Well,in my opinion,the BlockDeviceDriver is more suitable than any other solution for data processing scenarios.Does the community will agree to merge the BlockDeviceDriver to the Cinder repository again if our company hold the maintainer and CI? -- Original

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver

2018-07-16 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On 16/07, Rambo wrote: > Hi,all > > > In the Cinder repository, I noticed that the BlockDeviceDriver driver is > being deprecated, and was eventually be removed with the Queens release. > > > https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/stable/ocata/cinder/volume/drivers/block_device.py > > > In

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Stein blueprint - Plan to remove Keepalived support (replaced by Pacemaker)

2018-07-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
Thanks everyone for the feedback, I've made a quick PoC: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/undercloud-pacemaker-default And I'm currently doing local testing. I'll publish results when progress is made, but I've made it so we have the choice to enable pacemaker (disabled by default),

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver

2018-07-16 Thread Rambo
But I want to create a volume backed server for data processing scenarios,maybe the BlockDeviceDriver is more suitable. -- Original -- From: "Sean McGinnis"; Date: 2018年7月16日(星期一) 晚上9:32 To: "OpenStack Developmen"; Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy report 07/10/2018 - 07/16/2018

2018-07-16 Thread Bhatia, Manjeet S
Hi, There were total of 6 new bugs reported. I guess everyone was busy following soccer finals, so not a huge amount of bugs I see were Reported. The only Bug which I marked High priority was a documentation, which lacked the information about allowed dscp marking Values. High Priority 1.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] New "validation" subcommand for "openstack undercloud"

2018-07-16 Thread Udi Kalifon
We should also add support for the openstack client to launch the other validators that are used in the GUI. There are validators for the overcloud as well, and new validators are added all the time. These validators are installed under /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-validations/validations/ and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] New "validation" subcommand for "openstack undercloud"

2018-07-16 Thread Pablo Iranzo Gómez
Hi Dear Stackers, In order to let operators properly validate their undercloud node, I propose to create a new subcommand in the "openstack undercloud" "tree": `openstack undercloud validate' This should only run the different validations we have in the undercloud_preflight.py That way, an

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] New "validation" subcommand for "openstack undercloud"

2018-07-16 Thread Cédric Jeanneret
On 07/17/2018 06:57 AM, Udi Kalifon wrote: > We should also add support for the openstack client to launch the other > validators that are used in the GUI. There are validators for the > overcloud as well, and new validators are added all the time. > > These validators are installed under >

[openstack-dev] [oslo-reports][neutron] GMR for neutron

2018-07-16 Thread Deepthi V V
Hi, I am trying to get Guru Meditation Report from NEUTRON child process. I have tried below scenarios. GMR was generated only for the parent process in all the cases. 1. Kill -SIGUSR2 2. Kill -SIGUSR2 How can I get GMR for a child process. I assumed option 1 would give GMR for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Mistral workflow cannot establish connection

2018-07-16 Thread Steven Hardy
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 7:50 PM, Samuel Monderer wrote: > > Hi Remo, > > Attached are templates I used for the deployment. They are based on a > deployment we did with OSP11. > I made the changes for it to work with OSP13. > > I do think it's the roles_data.yaml file that is causing the error

[openstack-dev] 回复:Re: [cinder] about block device driver

2018-07-16 Thread Rambo
ok,thank you --原始邮件-- 发件人:"Gorka Eguileor "; 发送时间:2018年7月16日(星期一) 晚上7:32 收件人:"OpenStack Developmen" ; 主题:Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver --- On 16/07, Rambo wrote: > Well,in my opinion,the BlockDeviceDriver is more

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Reminder on nova-network API removal work

2018-07-16 Thread Stephen Finucane
On Fri, 2018-07-13 at 15:23 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > There are currently no open changes for the nova-network API removal > tracked here [1] but there are at least two low-hanging fruit APIs to > remove: > > * os-floating-ips-bulk > * os-floating-ips-dns The two of these are done now.

[openstack-dev] [networking-odl] Builds are failing in Stable/pike in networking-odl

2018-07-16 Thread A Vamsikrishna
Hi All, Builds are failing in Stable/pike in networking-odl on below review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/582745/ looks that issue is here: http://logs.openstack.org/45/582745/5/check/networking-odl-rally-dsvm-carbon-snapshot/be4abe3/logs/devstacklog.txt.gz#_2018-07-15_18_23_41_854 There is

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Stein blueprint - Plan to remove Keepalived support (replaced by Pacemaker)

2018-07-16 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
I'm all for it! Another benefit is better coverage for the standalone CI job(s), when it will (hopefully) become a mandatory dependency for overcloud multinode jobs. On 7/16/18 12:49 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:11 PM, Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: Sounds good

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla-ansible] how do I unify log data format

2018-07-16 Thread Mark Goddard
Hi Sergey, We are using Kolla Ansible with monasca log API, and have added support for customising the fluentd configuration [1][2]. Doug Szumski (dougsz) made some changes in Queens to try to standardise the log message format. I think Kolla Ansible would benefit from some better documentation

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver

2018-07-16 Thread Gorka Eguileor
On 16/07, Rambo wrote: > Well,in my opinion,the BlockDeviceDriver is more suitable than any other > solution for data processing scenarios.Does the community will agree to merge > the BlockDeviceDriver to the Cinder repository again if our company hold the > maintainer and CI? > Hi, I'm sure

[openstack-dev] [placement] Low hanging fruit bug for interested newcomers

2018-07-16 Thread Jay Pipes
Hi all, Here's a testing and documentation bug that would be great for newcomers to the placement project: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1781439 Come find us on #openstack-placement on Freenode IRC to chat about it if you're interested! Best, -jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver

2018-07-16 Thread Arkady.Kanevsky
Is this for ephemeral storage handling? -Original Message- From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 8:44 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver On 07/16/2018 09:32 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver

2018-07-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 07/16/2018 10:15 AM, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: Is this for ephemeral storage handling? For both ephemeral as well as root disk. In other words, just act like Cinder isn't there and attach a big local root disk to the instance. Best, -jay -Original Message- From: Jay

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver

2018-07-16 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 01:32:26PM +0200, Gorka Eguileor wrote: > On 16/07, Rambo wrote: > > Well,in my opinion,the BlockDeviceDriver is more suitable than any other > > solution for data processing scenarios.Does the community will agree to > > merge the BlockDeviceDriver to the Cinder

[openstack-dev] [nova][placement] placement update 18-28

2018-07-16 Thread Jay Pipes
This is placement update 18-28, a weekly update of ongoing development related to the [OpenStack](https://www.openstack.org/) [placement service](https://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/placement/). This week I'm trying to fill Chris' esteemable shoes while he's away. # Most Important ##

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Stein blueprint - Plan to remove Keepalived support (replaced by Pacemaker)

2018-07-16 Thread Michele Baldessari
Hi Emilien, On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 02:33:02PM -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > We have been supporting both Keepalived and Pacemaker to handle VIP > management. Keepalived is actually the tool used by the undercloud > when SSL is enabled (for SSL termination). While Pacemaker is used on > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] about block device driver

2018-07-16 Thread Jay Pipes
On 07/16/2018 09:32 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: The other option would be to not use Cinder volumes so you just use local storage on your compute nodes. ^^ yes, this. -jay __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] New "validation" subcommand for "openstack undercloud"

2018-07-16 Thread Dan Prince
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:27 AM Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > > Dear Stackers, > > In order to let operators properly validate their undercloud node, I > propose to create a new subcommand in the "openstack undercloud" "tree": > `openstack undercloud validate' > > This should only run the different

Re: [openstack-dev] [i18n] Edge and Containers whitepapers ready for translation

2018-07-16 Thread Akihiro Motoki
Jimmy, Does it mean translation **publishing** is ready now? In the first translation of the edge computing whitepaper, translation publishing was completely a manual process and it takes too long. If translation publishing support is not ready, it is a bit discouraging from translator

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-odl] Builds are failing in Stable/pike in networking-odl

2018-07-16 Thread A Vamsikrishna
+Isaku Hi Isaku, I found the reason for the build failure. below path it should be distribution-artifacts instead of distribution-karaf https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.snapshot/org/opendaylight/integration/distribution-karaf/-SNAPSHOT/maven-metadata.xml Line

[openstack-dev] [charms][ptg] Stein PTG planning etherpad for Charms

2018-07-16 Thread Frode Nordahl
Hello Charmers, A etherpad for planning of the upcoming PTG in Denver has been created [0]. Please make a note signalling your attendance and any topics you want covered. 0: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/charms-stein-ptg -- Frode Nordahl

[openstack-dev] [i18n] Edge and Containers whitepapers ready for translation

2018-07-16 Thread Jimmy McArthur
Hi all - We have both of the current whitepapers up and available for translation. Can we promote these on the Zanata homepage? https://translate.openstack.org/project/view/leveraging-containers-openstack?dswid=5684

Re: [openstack-dev] [i18n] Edge and Containers whitepapers ready for translation

2018-07-16 Thread Jimmy McArthur
Sorry, I should have also added... we additionally need permissions so that we can add the a new version of the pot file to this project: https://translate.openstack.org/project/view/edge-computing/versions?dswid=-7835 Thanks! Jimmy Jimmy McArthur wrote: Hi all - We have both of the

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] New "validation" subcommand for "openstack undercloud"

2018-07-16 Thread Cédric Jeanneret
Dear Stackers, In order to let operators properly validate their undercloud node, I propose to create a new subcommand in the "openstack undercloud" "tree": `openstack undercloud validate' This should only run the different validations we have in the undercloud_preflight.py¹ That way, an

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Stein blueprint - Plan to remove Keepalived support (replaced by Pacemaker)

2018-07-16 Thread Dan Prince
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 2:34 PM Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Greetings, > > We have been supporting both Keepalived and Pacemaker to handle VIP > management. > Keepalived is actually the tool used by the undercloud when SSL is enabled > (for SSL termination). > While Pacemaker is used on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [i18n] Edge and Containers whitepapers ready for translation

2018-07-16 Thread Jimmy McArthur
Akihiro Motoki wrote: Jimmy, Does it mean translation **publishing** is ready now? In the first translation of the edge computing whitepaper, translation publishing was completely a manual process and it takes too long. The initial version was a volunteer effort, but the Foundation wasn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [i18n] Edge and Containers whitepapers ready for translation

2018-07-16 Thread Jimmy McArthur
Jimmy McArthur wrote: Akihiro Motoki wrote: Jimmy, Does it mean translation **publishing** is ready now? In the first translation of the edge computing whitepaper, translation publishing was completely a manual process and it takes too long. The initial version was a volunteer effort,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Stein blueprint - Plan to remove Keepalived support (replaced by Pacemaker)

2018-07-16 Thread Emilien Macchi
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:42 AM Dan Prince wrote: [...] > The biggest downside IMO is the fact that our Pacemaker integration is > not containerized. Nor are there any plans to finish the > containerization of it. Pacemaker has to currently run on baremetal > and this makes the installation of