Re: [openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Find a slot for a meeting to discuss - ACTION NEEDED

2018-09-29 Thread Ildiko Vancsa
Hi Training Team, Based on the votes on the Doodle poll below we will have our ad-hoc meeting __next Friday (October 5) 1600 UTC__. Hangouts link for the call: https://hangouts.google.com/call/BKnvu7e72uB_Z-QDHDF2AAEI If you’re available for the Berlin training as mentor and haven’t signed up

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] The "intended purpose" of traits

2018-09-29 Thread Mark Goddard
To add some context around what I suspect is the reason for the most recent incarnation of this debate, many Ironic users have a requirement to be able to influence the configuration of a server at deploy time, beyond the existing supported mechanisms. The classic example is hardware RAID - the

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][charms] Updating Deployment Guides indices of published pages

2018-09-29 Thread Andreas Jaeger
On 9/27/18 10:04 AM, Frode Nordahl wrote: Hello docs team, What would it take to re-generate the indices for Deployment Guides on the published Queens [0] and Rocky [1] docs pages? It seems that the charms project has missed the index for those releases due to some issues which now has been

Re: [openstack-dev] [goal][python3] week 7 update

2018-09-29 Thread Doug Hellmann
Doug Hellmann writes: > Doug Hellmann writes: > >> == Things We Learned This Week == >> >> When we updated the tox.ini settings for jobs like pep8 and release >> notes early in the Rocky session we only touched some of the official >> repositories. I'll be working on making a list of the ones

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] The "intended purpose" of traits

2018-09-29 Thread Mark Mielke
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 12:02 PM Ed Leafe wrote: > On Sep 28, 2018, at 12:19 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > > I don't think placement should be concerned about temporal aspects > > of traits. If we can't write a web service that can handle setting > > lots of traits every second of every day, we

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] The "intended purpose" of traits

2018-09-29 Thread Ed Leafe
On Sep 29, 2018, at 10:40 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > >> So here it is. Two of the top influencers in placement, one saying we >> shouldn't overload traits, the other saying we shouldn't add a primitive >> that would obviate the need for that. Historically, this kind of >> disagreement seems to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][neutron] SmartNics with Ironic

2018-09-29 Thread Miguel Lavalle
Hi, Yes, this also matches the recollection of the joint conversation in Denver. Please look at the "Ironic x-project discussion - Smartnics" section in http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-September/135032.html Regards Miguel On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 1:31 PM Julia Kreger

[openstack-dev] [neutron][stadium][networking] Seeking proposals for non-voting Stadium projects in Neutron check queue

2018-09-29 Thread Miguel Lavalle
Dear networking Stackers, During the recent PTG in Denver, we discussed measures to prevent patches merged in the Neutron repo breaking Stadium and related networking projects in general. We decided to implement the following: 1) For Stadium projects, we want to add non-voting jobs to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] The "intended purpose" of traits

2018-09-29 Thread Mark Goddard
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 at 22:07, melanie witt wrote: > On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:42:23 -0500, Eric Fried wrote: > > On 09/28/2018 09:41 AM, Balázs Gibizer wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 3:25 PM, Eric Fried wrote: > >>> It's time somebody said this. > >>> > >>> Every time we turn a

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] The "intended purpose" of traits

2018-09-29 Thread Jay Pipes
On 09/28/2018 04:36 PM, Eric Fried wrote: So here it is. Two of the top influencers in placement, one saying we shouldn't overload traits, the other saying we shouldn't add a primitive that would obviate the need for that. Historically, this kind of disagreement seems to result in an impasse:

[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] Should we enable multiattach in tempest-full?

2018-09-29 Thread Matt Riedemann
Nova, cinder and tempest run the nova-multiattach job in their check and gate queues. The job was added in Queens and was a specific job because we had to change the ubuntu cloud archive we used in Queens to get multiattach working. Since Rocky, devstack defaults to a version of the UCA that

Re: [openstack-dev] [placement] The "intended purpose" of traits

2018-09-29 Thread Ed Leafe
On Sep 28, 2018, at 12:19 PM, Chris Dent wrote: > > I don't think placement should be concerned about temporal aspects > of traits. If we can't write a web service that can handle setting > lots of traits every second of every day, we should go home. If > clients of placement want to set weird