[openstack-dev] [omni] Has the Platform9's hybrid multicloud project been abandoned?

Hello All, I'm trying to figure out if the project openstack/omni https://github.com/openstack/omni has been abandoned or superseded by another project, as it is no longer updated (at least not in the last year). Generally speaking, which is, if any, a project that aims at the same goal? In

[openstack-dev] [charms] 18.11 OpenStack Charms release

Announcing the 18.11 release of the OpenStack Charms. The 18.11 charms have support for Nova cells v2 for deployments of Queens and later. The 18.11 release also has preview features including series upgrades and the Octavia load balancer charm. 47 bugs have been fixed and released across the

[openstack-dev] [Senlin] Does Senlin support Prometheus？

Hi， Senlin, Ceilometer/Aodh is currently integrated, does it support Prometheus ？ thanks __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [omni] Has the Platform9's hybrid multicloud project been abandoned?

Hi Andrea, Omni has not been abandoned by Platform9. We're still developing Omni internally, and are working to open source additional code as well as improve docs so that others may more easily test & contribute. With that said, I too would be interested in hearing how others are enabling, or

[openstack-dev] [nova] about filter the flavor

Hi,all I have an idea.Now we can't filter the special flavor according to the property.Can we achieve it?If we achieved this,we can filter the flavor according the property's key and value to filter the flavor. What do you think of the idea?Can you tell me more about this ?Thank you

[openstack-dev] [puppet] [stable] Deprecation of newton branches

Hello, We've been talking for a while about the deprecation and removal of the stable/newton branches. I think it's time now that we get rid of them, we have no open patches and Newton is considered EOL. Could cores get back with a quick feedback and then the stable team can get rid of

[openstack-dev] [nova] Stein forum session notes

Hey all, Here's some notes I took in forum sessions I attended -- feel free to add notes on sessions I missed. Etherpad links: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Berlin2018 Cheers, -melanie TUE --- Cells v2 updates - Went over the etherpad, no objections to anything -

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Enrique Llorente Pastora as a core reviewer for TripleO

+1 on making him tripleo-ci core. Great work! On 11/15/18 5:50 PM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to propose Quique (@quiquell) as a core reviewer for TripleO. > Quique is actively involved in improvements and development of TripleO > and TripleO CI. He also helps in other projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Enrique Llorente Pastora as a core reviewer for TripleO

On 15 Nov, Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to propose Quique (@quiquell) as a core reviewer for TripleO. > Quique is actively involved in improvements and development of TripleO and > TripleO CI. He also helps in other projects including but not limited to > Infrastructure. It'll be grand.

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] how to get horizon related logs to syslog?

Hi, Horizon logging depends on Django configuration which supports full python logging [1]. [1] does not provide enough examples. Perhaps [2] will help you (though I haven't tested it). [1] https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.0/topics/logging/ [2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [stable] Deprecation of newton branches

+1 for me, I haven't seen much interest in keeping these branches for puppet modules. I also would like to hear from our users though. On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:18 AM Tobias Urdin wrote: > Hello, > > We've been talking for a while about the deprecation and removal of the > stable/newton

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [stable] Deprecation of newton branches

With my core hat, I would give it a +1. At this point, it has no open patches and the last one we merged was 7 months ago. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/projects:openstack/puppet-+-project:openstack/puppet-tripleo+branch:stable/newton+is:open

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [stable] Deprecation of newton branches

+1 for me Em seg, 19 de nov de 2018 às 13:51, Mohammed Naser escreveu: > With my core hat, I would give it a +1. At this point, it has no open > patches and the last one we merged was 7 months ago. > > >

[openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other

Hi,all Recently, I want to use the shared image with each other.I find it isn't convenient that the producer notifies the consumer via email which the image has been shared and what its UUID is. In other words, why the image api v2 is no provision for producer-consumer communication?

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Can we deprecate the server backup API please?

On 11/18/2018 6:51 AM, Alex Xu wrote: Sounds make sense to me, and then we needn't fix this strange behaviour also https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409644/ The same discussion was had in the spec for that change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511825/ Ultimately it amounted to a big "meh,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein forum session notes

On 11/19/2018 3:17 AM, melanie witt wrote: - Not directly related to the session, but CERN (hallway track) and NeCTAR (dev ML) have both given feedback and asked that the policy-driven idea for handling quota for down cells be avoided. Revived the "propose counting quota in placement" spec to

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] about use shared image with each other

On 11/19/18 7:58 AM, Rambo wrote: > Hi,all > >      Recently, I want to use the shared image with each other.I find it > isn't convenient that the producer notifies the consumer via email which > the image has been shared and what its UUID is. In other words, why the > image api v2 is no

[openstack-dev] [Searchlight] New team meeting time

Hello team, In order to welcome new contributors to the Searchlight project, we decided to change the meeting time [1]: - Time: 13:30 UCT - Meeting Channel: #openstack-searchlight - Meeting recurrence: bi-weekly starting from 19th Nov. 2018 [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] how to get horizon related logs to syslog?

Akihiro Motoki writes: > Hi, > > Horizon logging depends on Django configuration which supports full python > logging [1]. > [1] does not provide enough examples. > Perhaps [2] will help you (though I haven't tested it). Based on https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/2.1/topics/logging/ it looks

[openstack-dev] [Searchlight] Weekly report, Stein R-21

Hello team, Here is the report for last week, Stein R-21. Please have a look: https://www.dangtrinh.com/2018/11/searchlight-weekly-report-stein-r-21.html Thanks, -- *Trinh Nguyen* *www.edlab.xyz *

Re: [openstack-dev] [puppet] [stable] Deprecation of newton branches

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 1:18 AM Tobias Urdin wrote: > > Hello, > > We've been talking for a while about the deprecation and removal of the > stable/newton branches. > I think it's time now that we get rid of them, we have no open patches > and Newton is considered EOL. > > Could cores get back

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Stein forum session notes

On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 2:39 PM Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 11/19/2018 3:17 AM, melanie witt wrote: > > - Not directly related to the session, but CERN (hallway track) and > > NeCTAR (dev ML) have both given feedback and asked that the > > policy-driven idea for handling quota for down cells be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Create VMs with Power architecture(ppc64) on OpenStack running on x86_64 nodes??

On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 17:25 -0200, Rafael Folco wrote: > (not sure if my answer has been sent, sorry if duplicate) > I don't touch ppc for a while but AFAIK this should work as long as you run > full emulation (qemu, not kvm) as > libvirt_type in nova.conf and get the qemu-system-ppc64le

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Enrique Llorente Pastora as a core reviewer for TripleO

On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 3:54 PM Sagi Shnaidman wrote: > > Hi, > I'd like to propose Quique (@quiquell) as a core reviewer for TripleO. Quique > is actively involved in improvements and development of TripleO and TripleO > CI. He also helps in other projects including but not limited to >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Create VMs with Power architecture(ppc64) on OpenStack running on x86_64 nodes??

(not sure if my answer has been sent, sorry if duplicate) I don't touch ppc for a while but AFAIK this should work as long as you run full emulation (qemu, not kvm) as libvirt_type in nova.conf and get the qemu-system-ppc64le installed in the compute node. Assume also you get the ppc64le image to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] Create VMs with Power architecture(ppc64) on OpenStack running on x86_64 nodes??

adding openstack dev. On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 18:08 +, Sean Mooney wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 11:57 -0500, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: > > On 2018-11-19 11:25, Yedhu Sastri wrote: > > > Hello All, > > > > > > I have some use-cases which I want to test in PowerPC > > > architecture(ppc64). As I