Hi IPv6 experts,
This is regarding the BP -
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipv6-two-attributes
Is it possible to give me a quick example of the
CLI that you envision?
This is so that the Horizon BP can be updated accordingly.
Once the neutron side of things is ready, when
Hi Shixiong,
Thanks for the reply and clearing up my question!
The document you've shared - they aren't the only possible combinations
correct?
Each of the two fields can have any one of these four values in any
possible combination yes?
Thanks!
On 2/11/14 7:00 AM,
Hi,
I can see that the forms.py file can have parameters/inputs that are of class
type switchable switched, i.e. this field 'B' will appear on the form if it's
'switched' based on a choice from a previous field 'A'. Then depending on the
choice made for 'B', field 'C' will appear on the form.
Hi shshang, all,
I have some preliminary Horizon diffs available and if anyone
would be kind enough to patch them and try to test the
functionality, I'd really appreciate it.
I know I'm able to create subnets successfully with
the two modes but if there's anything else you'd like
to test or have
Hi,
I just wanted to find out if anyone had been able to test using Horizon?
Was everything ok?
Additionally wanted to confirm - the two modes can be updated too yes
when using neutron subnet-update?
Thanks!
On 2/18/14 12:58 PM, Abishek Subramanian (absubram) absub...@cisco.com
wrote:
Hi
Hi,
I had a couple of questions regarding this UT and the
JS template that it ends up using.
Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction
and help me understand this a little better.
I see that for this particular UT, we have a total of 3 networks
in the network_list (the second network
12:06 PM, Abishek Subramanian (absubram) absub...@cisco.com
wrote:
Hi,
I had a couple of questions regarding this UT and the
JS template that it ends up using.
Hopefully someone can point me in the right direction
and help me understand this a little better.
I see that for this particular UT, we
Hi,
I had a question regarding the
dashboards/project/networks/subnets/workflows.py
file and in particular the portion of the ip_version field.
It is marked as a hidden input field for the update subnet class with this
note.
# NOTE(amotoki): When 'disabled' attribute is set for the ChoiceField
but the update
side was forgotten about?
On 3/11/14 11:30 AM, Radomir Dopieralski openst...@sheep.art.pl wrote:
On 11/03/14 15:52, Abishek Subramanian (absubram) wrote:
Hi,
I had a question regarding the
dashboards/project/networks/subnets/workflows.py
file and in particular the portion
to always pick the first network when this particular test is run?
Thanks!
On 3/11/14 9:58 AM, Abishek Subramanian (absubram) absub...@cisco.com
wrote:
Hi,
Can I please get some help with this UT?
I am having a little issue with the nics argument -
nics = [{net-id: netid, v4-fixed-ip: }
I wish
Hi all, Akihiro, David,
This is regarding the review for - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76653/
Akihiro - Thanks for the review as always and as I mentioned in the review
comment
I completely agree with you. This is a small featurette.
However this is small in that it adds to a chociefield
Hi,
This has to do with a patch I have out for review currently -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90093/
I believe version 5 to be the proper solution for the problem with the
unit tests that I am trying to fix.
However based on some comments that asked me to try a couple things,
version 7 is
Hi all, Akihiro,
I wanted to get a little feedback on the issue regarding the running
of the dashboard unit tests with the cisco n1k profiles
(and very soon the cisco DFA profiles) and more specifically
how to have existing network and instance unit tests run both
with and without profiles.
accepts the
profile_id yes?
On 4/24/14 10:54 AM, Abishek Subramanian (absubram) absub...@cisco.com
wrote:
Hi all, Akihiro,
I wanted to get a little feedback on the issue regarding the running
of the dashboard unit tests with the cisco n1k profiles
(and very soon the cisco DFA profiles) and more
Hi,
I need to make some changes to the horizon.instances.js file and I was
wondering what the best method would be to help debug issues in this file? Is
there a debugger or something available to debug this file separately?
Thanks!
Abishek
___
Dear Horizon community,
I would like to request an FFE for the review we have out currently for
the firewall feature in the project dashboard.
The review is at - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162552/
This feature is very important for the neutron FWaaS community to move the
firewall feature
Same here. I’m definitely interested in helping out but not sure how much time
I can commit to. Will most definitely help out with reviews and other decision
making process to help ensure magnum-ui is implemented and in the correct
direction relating to Horizon.
From: Thai Q Tran
17 matches
Mail list logo