Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Prototype of the script for Tempest auto-configuration

and through some python script and the help of simpleconfigparser I finalise to set it up for our use. best, Albert > On 26 Jan 2015, at 15:39, Timur Nurlygayanov > wrote: > > Hi, > > Yaroslav, thank you for raising the question, I realy like this feature, I > discu

[openstack-dev] [tempest] Question about test_external_network_visibility

Hi guys, What the reason behind this test, why I cannot have an external network that is shared amongst all the tenants? Also according to this: http://docs.openstack.org/icehouse/install-guide/install/apt-debian/content/neutron_initial-external-network.html

[openstack-dev] [tempest] Question about test_external_network_visibility

Hi guys, What the reason behind this test, why I cannot have an external network that is shared amongst all the tenants? Also according to this: http://docs.openstack.org/icehouse/install-guide/install/apt-debian/content/neutron_initial-external-network.html

Re: [openstack-dev] introducing cyclops

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:47:49PM +1200, Fei Long Wang wrote: > Our suggestion for the first IRC meeting is 25/August 8PM-10PM UTC time on > Freenodes's #openstack-rating channel. > > Thoughts? Please reply with the best date/time for you so we can figure out a > time to start. > I'll like to p

[openstack-dev] [Rating] Informal CloudKitty meetup

Hi, We've had an amazing feedback from what we've shown of CloudKitty during this summit. We want to go further and gather some feedbacks, ideas, and use cases from you guys. As tomorrow is meetups day I would like to organize an informal one so we can exchange on the subject and create a working

Re: [openstack-dev] introducing cyclops

On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 12:01:04PM +0200, Piyush Harsh wrote: > Dear All, > > Let me use my first post to this list to introduce Cyclops and initiate a > discussion towards possibility of this platform as a future incubated project > in OpenStack. > > We at Zurich university of Applied Sciences h

[openstack-dev] [rating] CloudKitty 23rd meeting agenda

Hi, I'm back from Japan, we'll start having regular meetings again. Here's today's agenda: * New contributions * Gnocchi support * Pending reviews * Road to version 0.5 * Next version goals During this meeting we need to iron out remaining bugs to prepare release 0.5. As soo

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Remove inactive contributors from cloudkitty-core

Hi, Some people in the cloudkitty-core group are not active anymore. They haven't produced a single contribution during the last cycle. Here is the list of the two people: - Adrian Turjak - François Magimel I think we should remove them from the group. We've got new faces in the project, let's g

[openstack-dev] [gnocchi][rating] Issues regarding gnocchi support in CloudKitty

thanks to people that took time to read it. BTW, we're available in #cloudkitty channel. You can reach me on most openstack channels too, I'm in UTC+1 timezone. Hoping we can find a solution and ship gnocchi support in the next CloudKitty version, which is pretty much ready. C

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi][rating] Issues regarding gnocchi support in CloudKitty

Hi Julien, You'll find attached to this mail two dump files. gnocchi_resource.txt is an example of resource requests and responses from gnocchi. gnocchi_measure.txt an example of a timeframe request. Metric (vcpus) measure == Data stored by ceilometer with default configurati

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi][rating] Issues regarding gnocchi support in CloudKitty

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 05:04:02PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26 2015, Stéphane Albert wrote: > > Here a first reply about resource handling. > > > Resource data > > = > > Duplicated resource informations from ceilometer, only revision ti

Re: [openstack-dev] [gnocchi][rating] Issues regarding gnocchi support in CloudKitty

On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 05:31:38PM +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26 2015, Stéphane Albert wrote: > > > I'll open a bug with a full history dump, sometime it's due to the host > > changing (flapping) from name to hash, this might be due to > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Remove inactive contributors from cloudkitty-core

Hi, We didn't get your opinion Guillaume, are you approving it? Cheers - Forwarded message from Stéphane Albert - Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 11:51:42 +0100 From: Stéphane Albert To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: [openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Remove inactive contributors

[openstack-dev] [Bilean][CloudKitty][Telemetry] Open discussion around Bilean and existing OpenStack components

Hi, I would like to continue the discussion that started in the [review][1] for the Big-Tent integration of the project Bilean. In the [review][1] the Bilean team stated that a new project was needed to overcome limitations of existing components. In this thread, I would like to have an open disc

Re: [openstack-dev] [Bilean][CloudKitty][Telemetry] Open discussionaround Bilean and existing OpenStack components

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:50:02AM +0800, 吕冬兵 wrote: > Hi, > > I'm sorry to see this discussion so late:). Thanks for attention. > > I don't oppose to contribute to add trigger-based solution to > CloudKitty, I just want to know if it's possible to support > trigger-based for CloudKitty based on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Bilean][CloudKitty][Telemetry] Opendiscussionaround Bilean and existing OpenStack components

Hi, On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 10:39:57AM +0800, 吕冬兵 wrote: > Hi Stéphane, > > I got what you mean, I’m sure that CloudKitty can rating by event, but > I have some other puzzles. Let me generally describe the arch of > Bilean first > > [events] <—> [rating] <—> [billing] > > When event coming from

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Changing release model type

Hi, Just a quick note to let you know that we are changing CloudKitty release type. We used independent one which forbids us of having stable branches and being part of the OpenStack release. We already discussed it during the OpenStack summit in Tokyo and it was pretty clear that we needed to cha

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] IRC meetings frequency and dates

Hi, We're having more and more contributors to the CloudKitty project, which is really nice. But sadly we hardly see new faces at the meetings. This mail is just to make a quick check to find out what's the reason behind that. Is this because the meeting hours are hard to attend? I know that most

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Feature freeze for release 0.5

Hi, As you might already know we are using the independent release which means that we can release whenever we want. Like we discussed during the Tokyo summit our goal is to release a couple versions before the Mitaka release which should correspond to the 1.0 version. Every version will impleme

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Meeting canceled for week 52 and 53

Hi, Most of the guys are currently in vacations, we are canceling meetings for the next 2 weeks. We'll be back at the beginning of January. Happy holidays __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsub

[openstack-dev] [rating] CloudKitty's future and Big tent application

Hi, We've lacked communication on the mailing list regarding CloudKitty. This mail is basically an interest check regarding CloudKitty and rating for OpenStack. During the Vancouver OpenStack Summit we talked to a lot of people about CloudKitty and its purpose. Many people seemed interested, and

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] No IRC meeting today

Hi, Most of the people involved in the project won't be able to attend today's meeting. Meeting is canceled. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.o

[openstack-dev] Blueprint to change (expand) traditional Ethernet interface naming schema in Fuel

el/+bug/1494223 [3] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/ [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/mos/+bug/1487044 With Best Regards, Albert Syriy, Software Engineer, Mirantis __ OpenStack Developme

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] Now that we are in the Big Tent what's the future?

Hi everyone, As you might have guessed based on the title CloudKitty is now part of the Big Tent. It's not new as the decision was taken one week ago, but some people might not be aware of this. Thanks to our Big Tent integration we are lucky enough to get two design summit slots. The first slot

Re: [openstack-dev] Blueprint to change (expand) traditional Ethernet interface naming schema in Fuel

actually it's out of my expertise) I would like to ask core reviewers to assess the risks and write comment in corresponding sections (marked as TODO). Looking forward to your reply, Albert Syriy, Software Engineer, Mirantis On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:30 PM, Sergey Vasilenko wrote: > >

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] IRC meetings canceled for two weeks

Hi, The summit is coming and most people are already in Japan. This makes the organisation of meetings pretty difficult. We'll cancel this week's meeting and next weeks too as most of the contributors will be in Tokyo talking CloudKitty's future. We'll resume normal schedule after the summit. Ch

[openstack-dev] [cloudkitty] PTL candidacy

Hi everyone, I'm announcing my candidacy for PTL of the CloudKitty team during the Newton cycle. Some of the features and improvements of the project I envisioned are not yet ready and contributed and there is more to come. But due to lack of contributor's time we'll need more time to make t

[openstack-dev] Freezer - tmp_file issue

Hi! I’m rather new at this so let me know if this is the wrong place to ask for a change. I was trying to run the Freezer code without the trickle executable but with a configuration file. It wouldn’t run. So, I took a look and it appears that if you do not have a trickle executable but you