Re: [openstack-dev] Which program for Rally

2014-08-13 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 15:48 -0600, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 13 August 2014 13:57, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 01:45:17AM +0400, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Keystone, Glance, Cinder, Neutron and Heat are running rally performance jobs, that can be used for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Live update of openstack

2014-08-20 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:12 PM, Sergey Kraynev skray...@mirantis.com wrote: Added tag Heat Regards, Sergey. On 1 August 2014 09:52, Manickam, Kanagaraj kanagaraj.manic...@hp.com wrote: Hi, This mail is generic to all openstack service and explained the problem with respect to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-20 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:37 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/08/14 05:24, Thierry Carrez wrote: So the idea that being (and remaining) in the integrated release should also be judged on technical merit is a slightly different effort. It's always been a factor in our choices,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Heat] Murano split dsicussion

2014-08-21 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:14 AM, Georgy Okrokvertskhov gokrokvertsk...@mirantis.com wrote: During last Atlanta summit there were couple discussions about Application Catalog and Application space projects in OpenStack. These cross-project discussions occurred as a result of Murano incubation

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Heat] Murano split dsicussion

2014-08-21 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Georgy Okrokvertskhov's message of 2014-08-20 13:14:28 -0700: During last Atlanta summit there were couple discussions about Application Catalog and Application space projects in OpenStack. These

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Heat] Murano split dsicussion

2014-08-22 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2014-08-21 20:14:12 -0700: On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Georgy Okrokvertskhov's message of 2014-08-20 13:14:28 -0700:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Docker] How to Dockerize your applications with OpenStack Heat in simple steps

2014-08-25 Thread Angus Salkeld
This seems misleading as there is no description on setting up nova-docker or using the heat docker container. -Angus On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Marouen Mechtri mechtri.mar...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I want to present you our guide for Docker containers deployment with OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-26 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:25 AM, Eoghan Glynn egl...@redhat.com wrote: Additional cross-project resources can be ponied up by the large contributor companies, and existing cross-project resources are not

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][all][Heat] Packaging of functional tests

2014-09-04 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/04/2014 11:32 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 10:45:59AM -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: On 08/29/2014 05:15 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 29/08/14 14:27, Jay Pipes wrote: On 08/26/2014 10:14 AM, Zane Bitter

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Defining what is a SupportStatus version

2014-09-04 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Gauvain Pocentek gauvain.pocen...@objectif-libre.com wrote: Hi, A bit of background: I'm working on the publication of the HOT resources reference on docs.openstack.org. This book is mostly autogenerated from the heat source code, using the sphinx XML output.

Re: [openstack-dev] Kilo Cycle Goals Exercise

2014-09-07 Thread Angus Salkeld
Lets prevent blogs like this: http://jimhconsulting.com/?p=673 by making users happy. 1) Consistent/easy upgrading. all projects should follow a consistent model to the way they approach upgrading. it should actually work. - REST versioning - RPC versioning - db (data)

Re: [openstack-dev] Kilo Cycle Goals Exercise

2014-09-07 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 09/07/2014 09:12 PM, Angus Salkeld wrote: Lets prevent blogs like this: http://jimhconsulting.com/?p=673 by making users happy. I don't understand why you would encourage writers of blog posts you disagree

Re: [openstack-dev] doubling our core review bandwidth

2014-09-07 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: I hope the subject got your attention :). This might be a side effect of my having too many cosmic rays, but its been percolating for a bit. tl;dr I think we should drop our 'needs 2x+2 to land' rule and instead

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence flow diagrams

2014-09-08 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Tyagi, Ishant ishant.ty...@hp.com wrote: Hi All, As per the heat mid cycle meetup whiteboard, we have created the flowchart and sequence diagram for the convergence . Can you please review these diagrams and provide your feedback?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Request for python-heatclient project to adopt heat-translator

2014-09-08 Thread Angus Salkeld
Hi Would the translator ever need to talk to something like Mistral for workflow? If so does it make sense to hook the translator into heat client. (this might not be an issue, just asking). -Angus On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Sahdev P Zala spz...@us.ibm.com wrote: Hello guys, As you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] convergence flow diagrams

2014-09-09 Thread Angus Salkeld
that have heat-stack-id as a key in the metadata and know it's associated with a heat stack, then it retrieves what ever other info it needs and sends an update to heat-engine (via rpc). -Angus -Ishant *From:* Angus Salkeld [mailto:asalk...@mirantis.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] Adding Nejc Saje to ceilometer-core

2014-09-11 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 10/09/2014 8:37 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote: Hi, Nejc has been doing a great work and has been very helpful during the Juno cycle and his help is very valuable. I'd like to propose that we add Nejc Saje to the ceilometer-core group. Please, dear ceilometer-core members,

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Confused about the future of health maintenance and OS::Heat::HARestarter

2014-09-17 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote: Background: Health maintenance is very important to users, and I have users who want to do it now and into the future. Today a Heat user can write a template that maintains the health of a resource R. The detection

Re: [openstack-dev] [Mistral] callback on workflow completion

2014-09-17 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:25 AM, Renat Akhmerov rakhme...@mirantis.com wrote: Ok, here is what I think... I totally support the first option for its easiness in terms of understanding how it all should work (no need to figure out if some additional objects must be deleted if a workflow has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat][Zaqar] Integration plan moving forward

2014-09-18 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 18/09/2014 7:11 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings, If I recall correctly, Heat was planning to adopt Zaqar regardless of the result of the graduation attempt (please correct me if I'm wrong). Based on this assumption, I'd like to start working on a plan forward to

[openstack-dev] [Heat] naming of provider template for docs

2014-09-18 Thread Angus Salkeld
Hi I am trying to add some docs to openstack-manuals hot_guide about using provider templates : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/121741/ Mike has suggested we use a different term, he thinks provider is confusing. I agree that at the minimum, it is not very descriptive. Mike has suggested

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] naming of provider template for docs

2014-09-21 Thread Angus Salkeld
Mailing List \(not for usage questions\) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Date: 19/09/2014 07:15 Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] naming of provider template for docs Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com wrote on 09/18/2014 09:33:56 PM: Hi I am trying to add some docs

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Announcing my candidacy for PTL

2014-09-21 Thread Angus Salkeld
not begin and end with a CloudFormation based solution. I look forward to some fun discussions in this area;) In conclusion these are exciting times for OpenStack and in particular Orchestration. I'd love the opportunity to face these challenges head on with our great community. Regards Angus

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Convergence: Backing up template instead of stack

2014-09-22 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:09 AM, Anant Patil anant.pa...@hp.com wrote: Hi, One of the steps in the direction of convergence is to enable Heat engine to handle concurrent stack operations. The main convergence spec talks about it. Resource versioning would be needed to handle concurrent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Question regarding Stack updates and templates

2014-09-22 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 1:04 AM, Anant Patil anant.pa...@hp.com wrote: Hi, In convergence, we discuss about having concurrent updates to a stack. I wanted to know if it is safe to assume that the an update will be a super set of it's previous updates. Understanding this is critical to

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Core criteria, review stats vs reality

2013-12-09 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 09/12/13 11:31 +, Steven Hardy wrote: Hi all, So I've been getting concerned about $subject recently, and based on some recent discussions so have some other heat-core folks, so I wanted to start a discussion where we can agree and communicate our expectations related to nomination for

Re: [openstack-dev] Sphinx 1.2 incompatibility (failing -docs jobs)

2013-12-10 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 10/12/13 14:57 -0800, James E. Blair wrote: Hi, Sphinx 1.2 was just released and it is incompatible with distutils in python 2.7. See these links for more info: https://bitbucket.org/birkenfeld/sphinx/pull-request/193/builddoc-shouldnt-fail-on-unicode-paths/diff

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack][Heat] AutoScaling scale down issue

2013-12-11 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 11/12/13 23:43 +0800, Jay Lau wrote: Greetings, Here come a question related to heat auto scale down. The scenario is as following: I was trying to deploy hadoop cluster with heat Auto Scaling template. When scale up a slave node, I can use user-data to do some post work for configuration

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nomination for heat-core

2013-12-18 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 19/12/13 15:21 +1300, Steve Baker wrote: I would like to nominate Bartosz Górski to be a heat-core reviewer. His reviews to date have been valuable and his other contributions to the project have shown a sound understanding of how heat works. Here is his review history:

Re: [openstack-dev] [All] tagged commit messages

2013-12-30 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 30/12/13 13:44 -0600, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote: On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 11:04 +0100, Flavio Percoco wrote: I like the idea of having custom tags. I'm a bit concerned about the implications this might have with cross-project collaborations. I mean, people contributing to more projects will have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Reducing pep8 ignores

2014-01-22 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 22/01/14 12:21 +, Steven Hardy wrote: On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 01:23:05PM +0200, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote: Hi all, we have an approved blueprint that concerns reducing number of ignored PEP8 and openstack/hacking style checks for heat (

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Oslo Context and SecurityContext

2014-01-27 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 27/01/14 22:53 +, Adrian Otto wrote: On Jan 27, 2014, at 2:39 PM, Paul Montgomery paul.montgom...@rackspace.com wrote: Solum community, I created several different approaches for community consideration regarding Solum context, logging and data confidentiality. Two of these approaches

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Proposed changes to solum-core

2014-01-27 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 27/01/14 21:00 +, Adrian Otto wrote: Solum Core Reviewers, Thanks everyone for your feedback. I have made the adjustments. Welcome to the core group Angus and Noorul. Thanks again Monty. Thank you everyone for your support! -Angus Regards, Adrian On Jan 27, 2014, at 12:54 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Oslo Context and SecurityContext

2014-01-28 Thread Angus Salkeld
we keep things simple and don't get into designing a boeing, we can always add these things later if they are really needed. I get the feeling we are being distracted from our core problem of getting this service functional by nice to haves. -Angus On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Angus

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Oslo Context and SecurityContext

2014-01-29 Thread Angus Salkeld
can come up with a good reason for this). Let's keep data model clear and well defined instead of blur it with meaningless contexts. sure, I have no issues with that. -Angus On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Angus Salkeld angus.salk...@rackspace.comwrote: On 28/01/14 07:13 -0800

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Solum database schema modification proposal

2014-02-03 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 03/02/14 16:22 +, Paul Montgomery wrote: Solum community, I notice that we are using String(36) UUID values in the database schema as primary key for many new tables that we are creating. For example: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68328/10/solum/objects/sqlalchemy/application.py

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core

2014-02-09 Thread Angus Salkeld
+1 From: Steve Baker [sba...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, February 10, 2014 8:38 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat] Nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core I would like to nominate Jason Dunsmore for heat-core. His

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Question about Zuul's role in Solum

2014-02-12 Thread Angus Salkeld
Excuse top post (web mail :() Can't we change our proposed workflow to match what Gerrit/Zuul are doing? So endorse the gating workflow as the official solum workflow. Pros: - we just use the current Gerrit/Zuul as-is. - great gating system for little effort - lots of people already helping

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP

2014-02-17 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 17/02/14 21:47 +, Shaunak Kashyap wrote: Hey folks, I was reading through https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Solum/FeatureBlueprints/CLI-minimal-implementation and have a question. If I’m understanding “app create” and “assembly create” correctly, the user will have to run “app create”

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP

2014-02-18 Thread Angus Salkeld
phase. -Angus Thanks, Shaunak From: Angus Salkeld [angus.salk...@rackspace.com] Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 5:54 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP On 17/02/14 21:47

[openstack-dev] [solum] async / threading for python 2 and 3

2014-02-18 Thread Angus Salkeld
Hi all I need to use some async / threaded behaviour to solum for image creation (all I need right now is to run a job asyncronously). eventlet is python 2 only tulip is python 3 only tornado (supports 2 + 3) http://www.tornadoweb.org twisted pyev etc... Options: 1) use eventlet and have the

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP

2014-02-19 Thread Angus Salkeld
From: Angus Salkeld [angus.salk...@rackspace.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 6:13 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] Question about solum-minimal-cli BP On 18/02/14 14:19 +, Shaunak Kashyap wrote: Thanks Angus

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] async / threading for python 2 and 3

2014-02-19 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 19/02/14 10:09 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: On Wed, Feb 19 2014, Angus Salkeld wrote: 2) use tulip and give up python 2 + use trollius to have Python 2 support. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/trollius So I have been giving this a go. We use pecan and wsme (like ceilometer), I wanted

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] async / threading for python 2 and 3

2014-02-20 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 20/02/14 13:52 +0100, victor stinner wrote: Hi, On 19/02/14 10:09 +0100, Julien Danjou wrote: On Wed, Feb 19 2014, Angus Salkeld wrote: 2) use tulip and give up python 2 + use trollius to have Python 2 support. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/trollius So I have been giving this a go

Re: [openstack-dev] [solum] async / threading for python 2 and 3

2014-02-23 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 21/02/14 11:03 +0100, Victor Stinner wrote: Le vendredi 21 février 2014, 09:27:49 Angus Salkeld a écrit : Honestly, I have no answer to your question right now (How useful is trollius ...). (...) I asked your question on Tulip mailing list to see how a single code base could support Tulip

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat]Heat use as a standalone component for Cloud Managment over multi IAAS

2014-02-26 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 26/02/14 07:03 -0700, Steven Dake wrote: On 02/26/2014 06:47 AM, Charles Walker wrote: Hi, I am trying to deploy the proprietary application made in my company on the cloud. The pre requisite for this is to have a IAAS which can be either a public cloud or private cloud (openstack is

[openstack-dev] [solum] use of the plan for m1

2014-03-04 Thread Angus Salkeld
Hi all I just wanted to clarify our use of the camp plan file (esp. for m1). Up until now I have been under the impression that use the plan to describe the app lifecycle (build/test/deploy) and the contents of the app. After attempting to write code that converts plans like this into heat

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] nominating Ildikó Váncsa and Nadya Privalova to ceilometer-core

2014-03-10 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 10/03/14 05:15 -0400, Eoghan Glynn wrote: Folks, Time for some new blood on the ceilometer core team. I'd like to nominate Ildikó Váncsa and Nadya Privalova as ceilometer cores in recognition of their contributions([1], [2]) over the Icehouse cycle, and looking forward to their continued

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum][Oslo] Next Release of oslo.messaging?

2014-03-17 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 18/03/14 07:39 +0530, Noorul Islam Kamal Malmiyoda wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Doug Hellmann and Victror Stinner (+ oslo cores), Solum currently depends on a py33 gate. We want to use oslo.messaging, but are worried that in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Proposed Core Reviewer Changes

2014-03-17 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 18/03/14 05:13 +, Adrian Otto wrote: Solum Cores, I propose the following changes to the Solum core reviewer team: +gokrokve +julienvey +devdatta-kulkarni -kgriffs (inactivity) -russelb (inactivity) Please reply with your +1 votes to proceed with this change, or any remarks to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano][Heat] MuranoPL questions?

2014-03-18 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 19/03/14 04:32 +0400, Ruslan Kamaldinov wrote: Here is my 2 cents: I personally think that evolving Heat/HOT to what Murano needs for it's use cases is the best way to make PaaS layer of OpenStack to look and feel as a complete and fully integrated solution. Standardising these things in a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration proposal for workflows

2013-10-08 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 09/10/13 00:53 +0400, Stan Lagun wrote: Hello, I’m one of the engineer working on Murano project. Recently we started a discussion about Murano and Heat Software orchestration and I want to continue this discussion with more technical details. I hope you are going to be at summit, as I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration proposal for workflows

2013-10-09 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 09/10/13 19:31 +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 06:59:22PM +0200, Alex Rudenko wrote: Hi everyone, I've read this thread and I'd like to share some thoughts. In my opinion, workflows (which run on VMs) can be integrated with heat templates as follows: 1. workflow

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration proposal for workflows

2013-10-10 Thread Angus Salkeld
resource types - IMHO. -Angus On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/10/13 19:31 +0100, Steven Hardy wrote: On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 06:59:22PM +0200, Alex Rudenko wrote: Hi everyone, I've read this thread and I'd like to share some thoughts. In my

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software orchestration proposal for workflows

2013-10-13 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 11/10/13 14:25 -0400, Lakshminaraya Renganarayana wrote: Excellent discussion on various issues around orchestration and coordination -- thanks to you all, in particular to Clint, Angus, Stan, Thomas, Joshua, Zane, Steve ... After reading the discussions, I am finding the following themes

Re: [openstack-dev] Thanks for fixing my patch

2013-10-13 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 11/10/13 11:34 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: Recently in the TripleO meeting we identified situations where we need to make it very clear that it is ok to pick up somebody else's patch and finish it. We are broadly distributed, time-zone-wise, and I know other teams working on OpenStack projects

Re: [openstack-dev] Thanks for fixing my patch

2013-10-13 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 13/10/13 22:58 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2013-10-14 09:45:38 +1100 (+1100), Angus Salkeld wrote: Note the commit will authored by the original poster, so perhaps if you modify a patch we should add a Modified-by: line to indicate that it was dual authored. We encourage the use of Co

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Plugin packaging

2013-10-15 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 15/10/13 16:05 -0700, Tim Smith wrote: Hi Sam, We wrote a Heat resource plugin as well [1] The trick to getting heat to auto-discover a module is to install it to the /usr/lib/heat (or possibly, but unlikely, /usr/lib64/heat) directory. I have found that the setuptools incantation: sudo

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-21 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 21/10/13 15:45 -0400, Mike Spreitzer wrote: Steve Baker sba...@redhat.com wrote on 10/15/2013 06:48:53 PM: I've just written some proposals to address Heat's HOT software configuration needs, and I'd like to use this thread to get some feedback:

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Incorporate Auditing Support / Usage Notifications

2013-10-21 Thread Angus Salkeld
Hi all There has been some interest in Heat generating usage notifications http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/87 so I thought I'd implement the blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/send-notification I'd like to ask for suggestions on the content of the notifications. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Incorporate Auditing Support / Usage Notifications

2013-10-22 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 21/10/13 15:11 -1000, Angus Salkeld wrote: Hi all There has been some interest in Heat generating usage notifications http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/87 so I thought I'd implement the blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/send-notification I'd like to ask

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-24 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 24/10/13 11:54 +0200, Patrick Petit wrote: Hi Clint, Thank you! I have few replies/questions in-line. Cheers, Patrick On 10/23/13 8:36 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Patrick Petit's message of 2013-10-23 10:58:22 -0700: Dear Steve and All, If I may add up on this already busy thread

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-25 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 25/10/13 09:25 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Angus Salkeld's message of 2013-10-24 18:48:16 -0700: On 24/10/13 11:54 +0200, Patrick Petit wrote: Hi Clint, Thank you! I have few replies/questions in-line. Cheers Patrick On 10/23/13 8:36 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: I think this fits into

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Proposal for new heat-core member

2013-10-25 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 25/10/13 12:12 -0700, Steven Dake wrote: Hi, I would like to propose Randall Burt for Heat Core. He has shown interest in Heat by participating in IRC and providing high quality reviews. The most important aspect in my mind of joining Heat Core is output and quality of reviews. Randall

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Nova][neutron][Heat][Oslo][Ceilometer][Havana]Single Subscription Point for event notification

2013-10-28 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 28/10/13 22:30 +, Qing He wrote: All, I found multiple places/components you can get event alarms, e.g., Heat, Ceilometer, Oslo, Nova etc, notification. But I fail to find any documents as to how to do it in the respective component documents. I 'm wondering if there is document as to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT Software configuration proposal

2013-10-28 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 28/10/13 16:26 -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: [snip] My components proposals had no hosted_on, but I've been thinking about the implications of implementing software configuration as resources, and one of the natural consequences might be that hosted_on is the best way of establishing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Locking and ZooKeeper - a space oddysey

2013-10-30 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 30/10/13 15:27 -0400, Jay Pipes wrote: Has anyone looked into using concoord for distributed locking? https://pypi.python.org/pypi/concoord Looks interesting! -Angus Best, -jay On 10/30/2013 02:39 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: So my idea here was that to break the abstraction for heat

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Choice of API infrastructure

2013-11-03 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 03/11/13 11:26 +0800, Russell Bryant wrote: On 11/02/2013 11:54 AM, Adrian Otto wrote: Noorul, I agree that key decisions should be tracked in blueprints. This is the one for this decision which was made in our 2013-10-18 public meeting. Jay's submission is consistent with the direction

[openstack-dev] [Mistral] really simple workflow for Heat configuration tasks

2013-11-11 Thread Angus Salkeld
Hi all I think some of you were at the Software Config session at summit, but I'll link the ideas that were discussed: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/Blueprints/hot-software-config-WIP https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/Blueprints/hot-software-config To me the basics of it are: 1. we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] HOT software configuration refined after design summit discussions

2013-11-12 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 12/11/13 10:32 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Thomas Spatzier's message of 2013-11-11 08:57:58 -0800: Hi all, I have just posted the following wiki page to reflect a refined proposal for HOT software configuration based on discussions at the design summit last week. Angus also put

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][mistral] EventScheduler vs Mistral scheduling

2013-11-12 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 12/11/13 15:13 -0800, Christopher Armstrong wrote: Given the recent discussion of scheduled autoscaling at the summit session on autoscaling, I looked into the state of scheduling-as-a-service in and around OpenStack. I found two relevant wiki pages:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

2013-11-14 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 14/11/13 10:19 -0600, Christopher Armstrong wrote: http://docs.heatautoscale.apiary.io/ I've thrown together a rough sketch of the proposed API for autoscaling. It's written in API-Blueprint format (which is a simple subset of Markdown) and provides schemas for inputs and outputs using

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum/Heat] Is Solum really necessary?

2013-11-14 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 14/11/13 13:41 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: So while I have been on vacation, I've been thinking about Solum and Heat. And I have some lingering questions in my mind that make me question whether a new server project is actually necessary at all, and whether we really should just be targeting

Re: [openstack-dev] Split of the openstack-dev list

2013-11-14 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 14/11/13 11:46 -0800, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2013-11-14 05:12:55 -0800: Hi everyone, I think that we have recently reached critical mass for the openstack-dev mailing-list, with 2267 messages posted in October, and November well on its way to pass 2000

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

2013-11-16 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 15/11/13 16:32 +0100, Zane Bitter wrote: On 14/11/13 19:53, Christopher Armstrong wrote: Thanks for the comments, Zane. On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com mailto:zbit...@redhat.com wrote: A few comments... #1 thing is that the launch configuration needs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

2013-11-16 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 15/11/13 08:46 -0600, Christopher Armstrong wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 15/11/13 02:48, Christopher Armstrong wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com mailto:asalk...@redhat.com wrote: On 14/11/13

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] rough draft of Heat autoscaling API

2013-11-18 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 18/11/13 12:57 +0100, Zane Bitter wrote: On 16/11/13 11:15, Angus Salkeld wrote: On 15/11/13 08:46 -0600, Christopher Armstrong wrote: On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 15/11/13 02:48, Christopher Armstrong wrote: On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:40 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Version Negotiation Middleware Accept Header issue

2013-11-19 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 19/11/13 19:40 +, Fuente, Pablo A wrote: Hi, I noticed that the Accept HTTP Header checked in the Version Negotiation Middleware by Heat is the same MIME type used by Glance (application/vnd.openstack.images-) Is this OK, or should it be something like

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][horizon]Heat UI related requirements roadmap

2013-11-26 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 26/11/13 22:55 +, Tim Schnell wrote: On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Tim Schnell tim.schn...@rackspace.commailto:tim.schn...@rackspace.com wrote: From: Christopher Armstrong chris.armstr...@rackspace.commailto:chris.armstr...@rackspace.com Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Heat API v2 - Removal of template_url?

2013-12-05 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 05/12/13 17:00 +, Steven Hardy wrote: On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:11:37PM +, ELISHA, Moshe (Moshe) wrote: Hey, I really liked the v2 Heat API (as proposed in Create a new v2 Heat APIhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/v2api) and I think it makes a lot of sense. One of the

Re: [openstack-dev] revert hacking to 0.8 series

2014-06-16 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/06/14 02:46, Ben Nemec wrote: On 06/16/2014 08:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Sean Dague wrote: Hacking 0.9 series was released pretty late for Juno. The entire check queue was flooded this morning with requirements proposals failing pep8

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer] [Heat] Ceilometer aware people, please advise us on processing notifications..

2014-06-23 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24/06/14 09:28, Clint Byrum wrote: Hello! I would like to turn your attention to this specification draft that I've written: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100012/1/specs/convergence-continuous-observer.rst Angus has suggested that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Solum][Mistral] New class of requirements for Stackforge projects

2014-06-25 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 25/06/14 15:13, Clark Boylan wrote: On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:54 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Hello, Solum has run into a constraint with the current scheme for requirements management within the OpenStack CI system. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Sergey Kraynev for heat-core

2014-06-27 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 27/06/14 08:10, Steve Baker wrote: I'd like to nominate Sergey Kraynev for heat-core. His reviews are valuable and prolific, and his commits have shown a sound understanding of heat internals.

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-07 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/07/14 05:30, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey This is an attempt to summarize a really useful discussion that Victor, Flavio and I have been having today. At the bottom are some background links - basically what I have open in my browser right

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] Asyncio and oslo.messaging

2014-07-07 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/07/14 08:28, Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 18:11 +, Angus Salkeld wrote: On 03/07/14 05:30, Mark McLoughlin wrote: Hey This is an attempt to summarize a really useful discussion that Victor, Flavio and I have been having

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] stevedore plugins (and wait conditions)

2014-07-08 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/07/14 09:14, Zane Bitter wrote: I see that the new client plugins are loaded using stevedore, which is great and IMO absolutely the right tool for that job. Thanks to Angus Steve B for implementing it. Now that we have done that work, I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Solum] Core Reviewer Change

2014-07-09 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/07/14 23:29, Adrian Otto wrote: Solum Core Reviewer Team, I propose the following change to our core reviewer group: +stannie (Pierre Padrixe) Please let me know your votes (+1, 0, or -1). +1 Thanks, Adrian

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] stevedore plugins (and wait conditions)

2014-07-09 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/07/14 10:17, Zane Bitter wrote: On 08/07/14 17:13, Angus Salkeld wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/07/14 09:14, Zane Bitter wrote: I see that the new client plugins are loaded using stevedore, which is great

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] stevedore plugins (and wait conditions)

2014-07-09 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/07/14 11:03, Randall Burt wrote: On Jul 9, 2014, at 3:15 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/07/14 17:13, Angus Salkeld wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/07/14 09:14, Zane Bitter wrote: I see

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] stevedore plugins (and wait conditions)

2014-07-09 Thread Angus Salkeld
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I wouldn't call our resources vast. I count 73 in your patch, not including contrib and assuming you didn't miss any ;). It's seems clear to me that we're well past the point of what the Extensions API was designed for. When everything is

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat]Heat Db Model updates

2014-07-17 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Thu, 2014-07-17 at 08:51 -0400, Ryan Brown wrote: On 07/17/2014 03:33 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:31:05AM -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: On 16/07/14 23:48, Manickam, Kanagaraj wrote: SNIP *Resource* Status action should be enum of predefined status +1

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on the patch test failure rate and moving forward

2014-07-24 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 14:39 -0700, James E. Blair wrote: OpenStack has a substantial CI system that is core to its development process. The goals of the system are to facilitate merging good code, prevent regressions, and ensure that there is at least one configuration of upstream OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Uniform style of README file for contrib resources

2014-07-30 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 13:41 +0400, Sergey Kraynev wrote: Hello guys. In the last time I meet again change related with changing content of README for Docker resource. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110541/ I can ditch mine, just making a change after helping someone on IRC through

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] Uniform style of README file for contrib resources

2014-07-30 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 17:05 +0400, Sergey Kraynev wrote: On 30 July 2014 16:21, Angus Salkeld angus.salk...@rackspace.com wrote: On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 13:41 +0400, Sergey Kraynev wrote: Hello guys. In the last time I meet again change related

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][rally][qa] Application for a new OpenStack Program: Performance and Scalability

2014-07-31 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Sun, 2014-07-27 at 07:57 -0700, Sean Dague wrote: On 07/26/2014 05:51 PM, Hayes, Graham wrote: On Tue, 2014-07-22 at 12:18 -0400, Sean Dague wrote: On 07/22/2014 11:58 AM, David Kranz wrote: On 07/22/2014 10:44 AM, Sean Dague wrote: Honestly, I'm really not sure I see this as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [git-review] Supporting development in local branches

2014-08-04 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Tue, 2014-08-05 at 03:18 +0400, Yuriy Taraday wrote: Hello, git-review users! I'd like to gather feedback on a feature I want to implement that might turn out useful for you. I like using Git for development. It allows me to keep track of current development process, it remembers

Re: [openstack-dev] Which program for Rally

2014-08-07 Thread Angus Salkeld
On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 15:48 -0600, John Griffith wrote: I have to agree with Duncan here. I also don't know if I fully understand the limit in options. Stress test seems like it could/should be different (again overlap isn't a horrible thing) and I don't see it as siphoning off resources so

[openstack-dev] TC Candidacy

2014-04-14 Thread Angus Salkeld
that are cohesive and projects that try to do one thing well. I think having more people on the TC that know these projects better can only be a good thing (note: I am not totally up to speed on Murano but aim to be). Regards Angus Salkeld ___ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Proposing Thomas Spatzier for heat-core

2014-04-22 Thread Angus Salkeld
On 22/04/14 14:43 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote: Resending with [Heat] in the subject line. My bad. On 22/04/14 14:21, Zane Bitter wrote: I'd like to propose that we add Thomas Spatzier to the heat-core team. +1 -Angus Thomas has been involved in and consistently contributing to the Heat

  1   2   3   >