[openstack-dev] [nova] Expand resource name allowed characters

2014-09-12 Thread Chris St. Pierre
these printable characters should not be joined in holy resource naming, speak now or forever hold your peace. Thanks! -- Chris St. Pierre Senior Software Engineer metacloud.com ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Expand resource name allowed characters

2014-09-15 Thread Chris St. Pierre
consensus on whether or not I need to go through the interminable blueprint process to get this accepted. So since everyone seems to think that this is at least not a bad idea, and since no one seems to know why it was originally changed, what stands between me and a +2? Thanks. -- Chris St. Pierre

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Expand resource name allowed characters

2014-09-15 Thread Chris St. Pierre
that. :) My review is at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/119421/ if anyone does find time to +N it. Thanks all! -- Chris St. Pierre Senior Software Engineer metacloud.com ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Expand resource name allowed characters

2014-09-15 Thread Chris St. Pierre
Linking clearly isn't my strong suit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/119741/ On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Chris St. Pierre stpie...@metacloud.com wrote: On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: I believe I did: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Expand resource name allowed characters

2014-09-18 Thread Chris St. Pierre
restrictions Kilo (?): Use anything you want At any rate, if accepting Unicode is an issue, then it's been an issue for a while. -- Chris St. Pierre Senior Software Engineer metacloud.com ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

[openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

2014-12-16 Thread Chris St. Pierre
to the trouble of writing a spec for it, particularly since it doesn't appear that glance currently talks to Nova as a client at all. Is this something that folks would be interested in having? Thanks! -- Chris St. Pierre ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

2014-12-16 Thread Chris St. Pierre
, but most of us take backups anyway. Same deal. On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Just set the images to is_public=False as an admin and they'll disappear from everyone except the admin. -jay On 12/16/2014 03:09 PM, Chris St. Pierre wrote: Currently

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

2014-12-16 Thread Chris St. Pierre
, then the image can't be deleted by accidentally. On 17/12/14 10:23, Chris St. Pierre wrote: The goal here is protection against deletion of in-use images, not a workaround that can be executed by an admin. For instance, someone without admin still can't do that, and someone with a fat finger

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

2014-12-17 Thread Chris St. Pierre
that wouldn’t require modification of glance would be a cron job that lists images and snapshots and marks them protected while they are in use. Vish On Dec 16, 2014, at 3:19 PM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 05:12:31PM EST, Chris St. Pierre

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

2014-12-17 Thread Chris St. Pierre
be too racy unless we we implement a test-and-set for such properties or there is a different job which queues up these requests and perform sequentially for each tenant. Thanks, -Nikhil -- *From:* Chris St. Pierre [chris.a.st.pie...@gmail.com] *Sent

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

2014-12-18 Thread Chris St. Pierre
] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use? Guess that's a implementation detail. Depends on the way you go about using what's available now, I suppose. Thanks, -Nikhil -- *From:* Chris St. Pierre [chris.a.st.pie...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] Option to skip deleting images in use?

2014-12-18 Thread Chris St. Pierre
installation. I do not consider it a solution to the problem that images can be deleted in use to take the protected flag away from arbitrary, bespoke use. On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/18/2014 02:08 PM, Chris St. Pierre wrote: I wasn't suggesting that we

[openstack-dev] [glance] File-backed glance scrubber queue

2015-02-11 Thread Chris St. Pierre
is reachable again, and I'll resurrect my blueprint to make the queue files suck less. Either way I'm happy to make the changes, I'm just not sure what the goal of these changes was, and how to properly proceed. Thanks for any clarification anyone can offer. -- Chris St. Pierre

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] File-backed glance scrubber queue

2015-02-12 Thread Chris St. Pierre
at 12:59 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/02/15 13:42 -0800, Chris St. Pierre wrote: I recently proposed a change to glance to turn the file-backed scrubber queue files into JSON: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145223/ As I looked into it more, though, it turns out

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] File-backed glance scrubber queue

2015-02-13 Thread Chris St. Pierre
:19 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 12/02/15 09:34 -0800, Chris St. Pierre wrote: Yeah, that commit definitely disables the file-backed queue -- it certainly *looks* like we want to be rid of it, but all of the code is left in place and even updated to support the new format

[openstack-dev] [python-novaclient] Better wording for secgroup-*-default-rules? help text

2015-03-10 Thread Chris St. Pierre
that the default security group is, in fact, not the 'default' security group or the security group which is default, but rather another beast entirely which isn't even actually a security group? Naming: still the hardest problem in computer science. :( -- Chris St. Pierre

Re: [openstack-dev] [python-novaclient] Better wording for secgroup-*-default-rules? help text

2015-03-10 Thread Chris St. Pierre
on what network traffic is allowed between guests; it only affects new tenants created afterwards. -- Chris St. Pierre __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Deleting 'default' security group for deleted tenant with nova-net

2015-05-07 Thread Chris St. Pierre
that will cause significant issues down the road. --Morgan Sent via mobile On May 7, 2015, at 09:37, Chris St. Pierre chris.a.st.pie...@gmail.com wrote: This bug recently came to my attention: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1241587 I've reopened it, because it is an actual problem

[openstack-dev] [nova] Deleting 'default' security group for deleted tenant with nova-net

2015-05-07 Thread Chris St. Pierre
to tackle the problem altogether? Thanks! -- Chris St. Pierre __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org