Hi guys,
I've created spec for this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134937/
Please, check out it.
2014-11-17 15:41 GMT+04:00 Mike Scherbakov mscherba...@mirantis.com:
I'm fine with getting this patch in...
though a few things should be fixed first, in my opinion:
1. I don't see
OpenStack group part of core permissions
I've added puppet-manager-core to puppet-murano-core
* Keep Puppet Murano folks part of core permissions for now
I've added Denis Egorenko to puppet-murano-core (group was empty
previously).
* Do not merge a patch without at least one review from both
Hi Andrew!
Sahara already merged. All CI tests were succeeded, also was built custom
iso [1] and ran bvt tests [2], which also were succeeded and we got +1 from
QA team.
For Murano we will do the same: resolve all comments, build custom iso, run
custom bvt and wait +1 from Fuel CI and QA team.
Hi colleagues!
I want to aware you about error in Nailgun [1]. I catched this in my patch
for Sahara [2] (patchset number 11, after resolving comment in 10). CI
tests were failed with error:
nailgun serializer failed TypeError: Value of settings:sahara.enabled.value
is undefined. Set
Hi Clayton!
I would like to use the same solution for this problem as we have for
::logging class. So, we just leaving those default parameters
without $::os_service_default and putting old values (10, 20, etc) [1] and
also we should to raise warnings, as suggests Alex Schultz (for example,
[2]).
+1 to Emilien.
If somebody already have uploaded such patches - please, mark them as WIP,
until we finish all work for cinder.
2015-11-03 22:57 GMT+09:00 Emilien Macchi :
> I'm seeing a lot of patches using the new $::os_service_default.
>
> Please stop trying to using it at
Hello Marcos,
I've look through on your module and it looks cool. Some code issues
inline. May be just only one nitpick from my side: can you add link to the
documentation in README file? Like it done in puppet-openstack modules.
Also thank you for caring of that and keeping in consistent with
Thank you! I will do my best!
2015-10-15 19:27 GMT+03:00 Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com>:
>
>
> On 10/13/2015 04:29 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > Denis Egorenko (degorenko) is working on Puppet OpenStack modules for
> > quite some time now.
> >
> > Some
Sorry, wrong link [3] https://github.com/openstack/puppet-sahara
<https://github.com/openstack/sahara>
2015-09-08 19:31 GMT+03:00 Denis Egorenko <degore...@mirantis.com>:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Currently Sahara [1] keeps two run mods: stand alone mode (all-in-one) a
Hello everyone,
Currently Sahara [1] keeps two run mods: stand alone mode (all-in-one) and
distributed mode. Difference between those modes is that second mode
creates separation between API and engine processes. Such architecture
allows the API process to remain relatively free to handle
+1 to way from paste above.
2015-09-23 16:42 GMT+03:00 Martin Mágr :
>
>
> On 09/23/2015 02:17 AM, Cody Herriges wrote:
>
> Alex Schultz wrote:
>
> Hey puppet folks,
>
> Based on the meeting yesterday[0], I had proposed creating a parser
> function called is_service_default[1]
Hi Mehdi,
Thank you for your reply! It works for us.
2015-12-01 20:40 GMT+03:00 Mehdi Abaakouk :
> Hi,
>
> Current scheme supports only one RabbitMQ node with url parameter.
>>
>
> That's not true, you can pass many hosts via the url like that:
>
+1
2015-12-09 0:25 GMT+03:00 Clayton O'Neill :
> +1
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Matt Fischer wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Rich Megginson
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/08/2015 09:49 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
g file sections that
> oslo_messaging relies on, right? So, this should really just require a
> change to the swift-proxy conf files to add the [oslo_messaging] sections,
> I think?
>
> Best,
> -jay
>
> Thanks,
>> Richard Hawkins
>> Software Developer - Cloud Fi
>
> Last I checked, which was quite a while ago, openstackclient didn't
> support everything we were using from the neutron client.
That's true. Openstack client doesn't support all features of neutron
client [1].
I would prefer use 3) option, but, unfortunately, i also don't see way, how
to
Hi,
Alex is doing great job! +1 from my side!
2016-01-06 16:27 GMT+03:00 Sebastien Badia :
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:55:01PM (-0500), Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Alex Schultz (mwhahaha on IRC) has been a very active contributor over
> > the last months in the Puppet
>
> * Reduce puppet versions testing to 3.6, 3.8, 4.5 and latest (keep the
> last one non-voting). It seems that 3.6 and 3.8 are widely used by our
> consumers (default in centos7 & ubuntu LTS), and 4.5 is the latest
> release in the 4.x series.
+1 from me too
* Move functional puppet4 jobs
I'm not a fuel core member, but i also would like to vote +1 for Matthew.
He's doing great job!
2016-02-24 16:02 GMT+03:00 Aleksandr Didenko :
> +1
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Vladimir Kuklin
> wrote:
>
>> Fellow Fuelers
>>
>> I would like
Hello folks,
i would like to notify you, that we are going to remove Murano as built
in Fuel and move this functionality to fuel-plugin.
Transition from Fuel built in to Fuel plugin deployment will follow next
way:
* Murano deployment in Fuel 9.0 will be deprecated: we leave an ability to
nstallation of Murano
> plugin on Fuel 9.0? If so, that might be a problem.
>
> Thanks,
> - Igor
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Denis Egorenko <degore...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > i would like to notify you, that we are going t
We did our meeting, and you can read the notes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/puppet_openstack/2016/puppet_openstack.2016-04-05-15.00.html
Thanks!
2016-04-04 15:29 GMT+03:00 Emilien Macchi :
> Hi,
>
> We'll have our weekly meeting tomorrow at 3pm UTC on
>
Hi Athlan,
thanks for attention of this problem. We have one more related change [1]
and bug [2]
for this problem, when we option 'domain_specific_drivers' is used.
I would like to vote for 3) case.
As I see it there are three ways to approach this:
> - iterate over all domains and keep the
or tomorrow, so that we can take a
> final decision on this and start coding:
> -
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-20160322
Yep, that have to be discussed.
2016-03-21 18:09 GMT+03:00 Sofer Athlan-Guyot <sathl...@redhat.com>:
> Denis Egorenko <dego
+1
2016-03-04 18:40 GMT+03:00 Emilien Macchi :
> Hi,
>
> To scale-up our review process, we created pupept-keystone-core and it
> worked pretty well until now.
>
> I propose that we continue this model and create puppet-neutron-core.
>
> I also propose to add Sergey Kolekonov
Hi Marcos,
Are you still working on your initial commit to puppet-ec2api [1] ?
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276103/
2016-01-29 22:02 GMT+03:00 Emilien Macchi :
>
>
> On 01/29/2016 10:35 AM, Marcos Fermin Lobo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since I finished to "apply" for
+1 from my side :) well deserved.
2016-05-19 17:17 GMT+03:00 Emilien Macchi :
> Hi,
>
> I don't need to introduce Ivan Berezovskiy (iberezovskiy on IRC), he's
> been doing tremendous work in Puppet OpenStack over the last months,
> in a regular way.
>
> Some highlights about
Thank you Yanis for your work on puppets!
Good luck in your next projects!
2016-05-10 16:14 GMT+04:00 Emilien Macchi :
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Yanis Guenane
> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > After the Mitaka summit, my main area of focus at
>
> Some of UI plugins, like murano-dashboard, needs to add extra parameters
> https://github.com/openstack/murano-dashboard/blob/master/muranodashboard/local/local_settings.py.example
> to local_settings file (which comes from Horizon).
> My question is: Should puppet-horizon module provide those
>
> Does Murano uses the same local_settings.py file as Horizon? If yes,
> we might stop using puppet-murano to manage this file.
Yes, it uses same file.
And maybe find a mechanism in puppet-horizon with a provider, so we
> can have a plugin architecture like:
> horizon::plugins::murano
>
big +1 from me, thanks for work Sofer!
2016-07-28 19:42 GMT+03:00 Rich Megginson :
> +1 - good guy
>
>
> On 07/28/2016 09:58 AM, Ivan Berezovskiy wrote:
>
> +1, good job!
>
> 2016-07-28 18:50 GMT+03:00 Matt Fischer :
>
>> +1 from me!
>>
>> On Jul 28,
+1
2017-01-20 4:10 GMT+04:00 Emilien Macchi :
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Alex Schultz wrote:
> > Hey Puppet Cores,
> >
> > I would like to nominate Mykyta Karpin as a Core reviewer for the
> > Puppet OpenStack modules. He has been providing
+1
2016-09-08 13:06 GMT+03:00 Aleksandr Didenko :
> +1
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Sergey Vasilenko > wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> __
>> OpenStack Development
Hey Emilien,
It was a big pleasure to work with you!
Thank you for all your help! :) And good luck on your next project and
activities!
2016-09-09 19:05 GMT+03:00 Emilien Macchi :
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a little blog post about the last cycle in PuppetOpenStack:
>
+1, good job
2016-09-15 17:44 GMT+03:00 Matt Fischer :
> +1 to all. Thanks for your work guys!
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Emilien Macchi
> wrote:
>
>> While our group keeps moving, it's time to propose again new people
>> part of core team.
>>
Thank you all! I will do my best! :)
2016-08-29 15:21 GMT+03:00 Maksim Malchuk :
> Although today is not the 31 Aug and we have a lack of core-reviewers in
> the fuel-library I would like to speed up the process a little.
>
> And as there are no objections so, please
Thank you Matt for all your work and help :) Good luck!
2017-04-05 4:20 GMT+04:00 Emilien Macchi :
> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Matt Fischer wrote:
> > I am stepping down as core in the puppet openstack project. This is the
> > culmination of a long
Hello puppet'ers!
Now it's time to say "Goodbay" to you, i'm leaving Mirantis and as well
stepping down from Puppet/Fuel core groups.
It was a really cool to work with all of you! I've learn a lot! Thank you
all for all your help and advises.
Also want to especially say "Thank you" to Emilien
37 matches
Mail list logo