[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Future CI jobs

2014-08-19 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, I'd like to firm up our plans around the ci jobs we discussed at the tripleo sprint, at the time we jotted down the various jobs on an etherpad, to better visualize the matrix of coverage I've put it into a spreadsheet[1]. Before we go about making these changes I'd like to go through

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Future CI jobs

2014-08-20 Thread Derek Higgins
On 19/08/14 20:55, Gregory Haynes wrote: Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2014-08-19 10:41:11 +: Hi All, I'd like to firm up our plans around the ci jobs we discussed at the tripleo sprint, at the time we jotted down the various jobs on an etherpad, to better visualize the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Future CI jobs

2014-08-20 Thread Derek Higgins
On 19/08/14 13:07, Giulio Fidente wrote: On 08/19/2014 12:41 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, I'd like to firm up our plans around the ci jobs we discussed at the tripleo sprint, at the time we jotted down the various jobs on an etherpad, to better visualize the matrix of coverage I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Future CI jobs

2014-08-20 Thread Derek Higgins
On 19/08/14 20:58, Gregory Haynes wrote: Excerpts from Giulio Fidente's message of 2014-08-19 12:07:53 +: One last comment, maybe a bit OT but I'm raising it here to see what is the other people opinion: how about we modify the -ha job so that at some point we actually kill one of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Change of meeting time

2014-08-20 Thread Derek Higgins
On 24/05/14 01:21, James Polley wrote: Following a lengthy discussion under the subject Alternating meeting tmie for more TZ friendliness, the TripleO meeting now alternates between Tuesday 1900UTC (the former time) and Wednesday 0700UTC, for better coverage across Australia, India, China,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Review metrics - what do we want to measure?

2014-09-04 Thread Derek Higgins
On 14/08/14 00:03, James Polley wrote: In recent history, we've been looking each week at stats from http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-openreviews.html to get a gauge on how our review pipeline is tracking. The main stats we've been tracking have been the since the last

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Review metrics - what do we want to measure?

2014-09-04 Thread Derek Higgins
On 04/09/14 14:54, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-09-04 11:01:55 +0100 (+0100), Derek Higgins wrote: [...] How would people feel about turning [auto-abandon] back on? A lot of reviewers (myself among them) feel auto-abandon was a cold and emotionless way to provide feedback on a change

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Propose adding StevenK to core reviewers

2014-09-12 Thread Derek Higgins
+1 On 09/09/14 19:32, Gregory Haynes wrote: Hello everyone! I have been working on a meta-review of StevenK's reviews and I would like to propose him as a new member of our core team. As I'm sure many have noticed, he has been above our stats requirements for several months now. More

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Adding hp1 back running tripleo CI

2014-09-15 Thread Derek Higgins
I've been running overcloud CI tests on hp1 to establish if its ready to turn back on running real CI, I'd like to add this back in soon but first have some numbers we should look at and make some decisions The hp1 cloud throws up more false negatives then rh1, nearly all of these are either

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Set WIP for stale patches?

2014-09-17 Thread Derek Higgins
On 17/09/14 14:40, Charles Crouch wrote: - Original Message - Hi, as part of general housekeeping on our reviews, it was discussed at last week's meeting [1] that we should set workflow -1 for stale reviews (like gerrit used to do when I were a lad). The specific criteria

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Adding hp1 back running tripleo CI

2014-09-17 Thread Derek Higgins
On 15/09/14 22:37, Gregory Haynes wrote: This is a total shot in the dark, but a couple of us ran into issues with the Ubuntu Trusty kernel (I know I hit it on HP hardware) that was causing severely degraded performance for TripleO. This fixed with a recently released kernel in Trusty... maybe

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Installing from packages in tripleo-image-elements

2014-01-08 Thread Derek Higgins
On 08/01/14 05:07, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2014-01-07 16:27:35 -0800: Another piece to the conversation I think is update philosophy. If you are always going to require a new image and no customization after build ever, ever, the messiness that source usually

[openstack-dev] os-*-config in tripleo repositories

2014-01-09 Thread Derek Higgins
It looks like we have some duplication and inconsistencies on the 3 os-*-config elements in the tripleo repositories os-apply-config (duplication) : We have two elements that install this diskimage-builder/elements/config-applier/ tripleo-image-elements/elements/os-apply-config/

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][review] Please treat -1s on check-tripleo-*-precise as voting.

2014-02-17 Thread Derek Higgins
On 17/02/14 01:25, Robert Collins wrote: Hi! The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories, *and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because we cannot submit to the gate unless jenkins votes verified... *and* we have no redundancy for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo]help needed - nodepool and zuul support for ci-overcloud

2014-02-18 Thread Derek Higgins
On 17/02/14 23:43, Robert Collins wrote: So we experimented with the ci-overcloud (a TripleO deployed cloud for running CI for TripleO) and it uncovered some bugs/limitations in nodepool and zuul. We need to fix these to reduce our negative impact on the Openstack-infra team, before they'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][review] Please treat -1s on check-tripleo-*-precise as voting.

2014-02-21 Thread Derek Higgins
On 21/02/14 03:31, Robert Collins wrote: On 18 February 2014 04:30, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com wrote: On 17/02/14 01:25, Robert Collins wrote: Hi! The nascent tripleo-gate is now running on all tripleo repositories, *and should pass*, but are not yet voting. They aren't voting because

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo][CI] check-tripleo outage

2014-02-26 Thread Derek Higgins
On 25/02/14 00:08, Robert Collins wrote: Today we had an outage of the tripleo test cloud :(. tl;dr: - we were down for 14 hours - we don't know the fundamental cause - infra were not inconvenienced - yaaay - its all ok now. Looks like we've hit the same problem again tonight, I've o

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] tripleo-cd-admins team update / contact info question

2014-02-27 Thread Derek Higgins
On 25/02/14 22:30, Robert Collins wrote: In the tripleo meeting today we re-affirmed that the tripleo-cd-admins team is aimed at delivering production-availability clouds - thats how we know the the tripleo program is succeeding (or not !). So if you're a member of that team, you're on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] test environment requirements

2014-03-21 Thread Derek Higgins
On 13/03/14 16:12, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: So we already have pretty high requirements - its basically a 16G workstation as minimum. Specifically to test the full story: - a seed VM - an undercloud VM (bm deploy

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] test environment requirements

2014-03-21 Thread Derek Higgins
On 13/03/14 09:51, Robert Collins wrote: So we already have pretty high requirements - its basically a 16G workstation as minimum. Specifically to test the full story: - a seed VM - an undercloud VM (bm deploy infra) - 1 overcloud control VM - 2 overcloud hypervisor VMs 5

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] test environment requirements

2014-03-21 Thread Derek Higgins
On 14/03/14 20:16, Ben Nemec wrote: On 2014-03-13 11:12, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: So we already have pretty high requirements - its basically a 16G workstation as minimum. Specifically to test the full story: - a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving tripleo-ci towards the gate

2014-03-25 Thread Derek Higgins
On 24/03/14 22:58, Joe Gordon wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com mailto:der...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, I'm trying to get a handle on what needs to happen before getting tripleo-ci(toci) into the gate, I realize this may take some

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][reviews] We're falling behind

2014-03-26 Thread Derek Higgins
On 25/03/14 20:17, Robert Collins wrote: TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side - we're now slipping on reviews /o\. In the meeting today we had basically two answers: more cores, and more work by cores. We're slipping by 2 reviews a day, which given 16 cores

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] reviewer update march

2014-04-03 Thread Derek Higgins
On 03/04/14 12:02, Robert Collins wrote: Getting back in the swing of things... Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] TripleO core reviewer update - november

2013-10-30 Thread Derek Higgins
On 30/10/13 09:06, Robert Collins wrote: Hi, like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted with -core responsibilities. In this months

Re: [openstack-dev] Top Gate Bugs

2013-11-20 Thread Derek Higgins
On 20/11/13 14:21, Anita Kuno wrote: Thanks for posting this, Joe. It really helps to create focus so we can address these bugs. We are chatting in #openstack-neutron about 1251784, 1249065, and 1251448. We are looking for someone to work on 1251784 - I had mentioned it at Monday's

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] New test envs deployed

2014-07-11 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, this morning we deployed new testenv images on the rh1 rack for CI, a number of things have changed 1. Each TE now contains 15 nodes this should allow us to deploy more VM's per job (essentially paving the way to allow us to add multiple HA controllers to our overcloud job) 2.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal to add Jon Paul Sullivan and Alexis Lee to core review team

2014-07-15 Thread Derek Higgins
On 09/07/14 16:52, Clint Byrum wrote: Hello! I've been looking at the statistics, and doing a bit of review of the reviewers, and I think we have an opportunity to expand the core reviewer team in TripleO. We absolutely need the help, and I think these two individuals are well positioned to

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] recheck no bug and comment

2014-07-16 Thread Derek Higgins
On 16/07/14 14:48, Steve Martinelli wrote: What are the benefits of doing this over looking at the existing rechecks, and if not there opening a bug and rechecking the new bug? I agree we should be using a bug number (or open one when needed), the example in the original email should have

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] reviewer update march [additional cores]

2014-04-08 Thread Derek Higgins
On 08/04/14 00:50, Robert Collins wrote: tl;dr: 3 more core members to propose: bnemec greghaynes jdon +1 for all On 4 April 2014 08:55, Chris Jones c...@tenshu.net wrote: Hi +1 for your proposed -core changes. Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the

[openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, I've been taking a look at devstack support for nova-docker[1] which was recently taken out of nova. I stumbled across a similar effort currently underway[2], so have based my work off that. What I hope to do is setup a check doing CI on devstack-f20 nodes[3], this will setup a

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Consolidating efforts around Fedora/Centos gate job

2014-04-11 Thread Derek Higgins
On 11/04/14 06:43, Ian Wienand wrote: Hi, To summarize recent discussions, nobody is opposed in general to having Fedora / Centos included in the gate. However, it raises a number of big questions : which job(s) to run on Fedora, where does the quota for extra jobs come from, how do we get

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-11 Thread Derek Higgins
the integration directly into devstack. Yup, agreed. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84839/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/81097/3/contrib/devstack/stackrc.diff On 4/11/14 9:53 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/11/2014 10:11 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-13 Thread Derek Higgins
On 11/04/14 21:03, Paul Czarkowski wrote: Based on this feedback I have removed the docker portions of the review to devstack But have kept in the changes that make it easier for a nova drivers to add their own Files to the nova rootwrap.d directory. sounds good, I'll give it a go and update

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-13 Thread Derek Higgins
On 13/04/14 01:49, Russell Bryant wrote: On 04/12/2014 02:27 PM, James E. Blair wrote: Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com writes: Agreed, where it makes sense. In general we should be avoiding third party CI unless we need to support something we can't in the gate -- a proprietary virt driver,

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][nova][docker]

2014-04-13 Thread Derek Higgins
On 12/04/14 04:45, Eric Windisch wrote: Any disagreements with that goal? No disagreement at all. Not that we're talking yet about moving the driver back into Nova, I'd like to take this opportunity to remind anyone interesting in contributing a Cinder driver that it would be a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO][Summit] Topic review for Atlanta

2014-04-23 Thread Derek Higgins
On 22/04/14 01:01, Robert Collins wrote: I've pulled the summit talks into an etherpad (https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-icehouse-summit) - btw, who can review these within the system itself? Anyhow - please put comments in the etherpad and help select the sessions we'll do during

[openstack-dev] [infra] Intermittent network problems allowed to sneak passed the gate?

2014-05-06 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi, I've been working on a check job that uses devstack-gate jobs to run the nova with the docker driver, while doing this I noticed that sometimes during the nova boot for an instance the node looses network connectivity(obviously a problem that needs to be worked on). Whats interesting is

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Intermittent network problems allowed to sneak passed the gate?

2014-05-06 Thread Derek Higgins
On 06/05/14 16:17, Sean Dague wrote: On 05/06/2014 10:52 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi, I've been working on a check job that uses devstack-gate jobs to run the nova with the docker driver, while doing this I noticed that sometimes during the nova boot for an instance the node looses

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Decreasing resource usage in tripleo CI

2014-05-06 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi, I mentioned this at the tripleo meeting today and to get opinions out there I'd like to bring it up here, In tripleo we are currently very tight on resources to run our CI jobs and I'd like to scale back temporarily until we have either more capacity or reorganize things a bit, to more

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Intermittent network problems allowed to sneak passed the gate?

2014-05-07 Thread Derek Higgins
On 06/05/14 23:55, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2014-05-06 15:52:04 +0100 (+0100), Derek Higgins wrote: [...] The job simply got restarted and this kept happening until the job passed. A legitimately failed job : https://jenkins05.openstack.org/job/check-nova-docker-dsvm-f20/2/ http

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Decreasing resource usage in tripleo CI

2014-05-08 Thread Derek Higgins
On 07/05/14 00:07, Clint Byrum wrote: +1 to the plans. We've recently freed up a few more boxes for the HP region, and we'll be rolling those out as we migrate from saucy to trusty for the rest of the cloud. But we should do all of the things below anyway. Thanks, didn't hear any

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Spec Template Change Proposal

2014-05-22 Thread Derek Higgins
On 21/05/14 22:56, James Slagle wrote: On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Jay Dobies jason.dob...@redhat.com wrote: Currently, there is the following in the template: Proposed change === [snip] Alternatives [snip] Security impact --- The unit

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] OpenStack races piling up in the gate - please stop approving patches unless they are fixing a race condition

2014-06-05 Thread Derek Higgins
On 05/06/14 13:07, Sean Dague wrote: You may all have noticed things are really backed up in the gate right now, and you would be correct. (Top of gate is about 30 hrs, but if you do the math on ingress / egress rates the gate is probably really double that in transit time right now). We've

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI report : 24/09/2014 - 26/09/2014

2014-09-26 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, On Wednesday, I started keeping a short summary of issues hit by tripleo CI, so in time we can look back to properly assess the frequency or problems along with their causes. The list will be maintained here (most recent at the top)

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI report : 27/09/2014 - 03/10/2014

2014-10-06 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, There was 1 CI event last week, regression in ironic https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1375641 All ironic tripleo CI tests failed for about 12 hours For more info see https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-breakages thanks, Derek.

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI report : 04/10/2014 - 17/10/2014

2014-10-17 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, Nothing to report since the last report, 2 weeks of no breakages. thanks, Derek. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI report : 18/10/2014 - 31/10/2014

2014-11-06 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, The week before last saw no problems with CI But last week we had 3 separate problems causing tripleo CI tests to fail until they were dealt with 1. pypi.openstack.org is no longer being maintained, which we were using in tripleo-ci, we've now moved to pypi.python.org 2. nova started

[openstack-dev] [all] config options not correctly deprecated

2014-11-10 Thread Derek Higgins
Tl;dr oslo.config wasn't logging warnings about deprecated config options, do we need to support them for another cycle? A set of patches to remove deprecated options in Nova was landed on Thursday[1], these were marked as deprecated during the juno dev cycle and got removed now that kilo has

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] config options not correctly deprecated

2014-11-10 Thread Derek Higgins
On 10/11/14 11:00, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:45:02AM +, Derek Higgins wrote: Tl;dr oslo.config wasn't logging warnings about deprecated config options, do we need to support them for another cycle? AFAIK, there has not been any change in olso.config behaviour

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] config options not correctly deprecated

2014-11-14 Thread Derek Higgins
On 13/11/14 23:56, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Ben Nemec's message of 2014-11-13 15:20:47 -0800: On 11/10/2014 05:00 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:45:02AM +, Derek Higgins wrote: Tl;dr oslo.config wasn't logging warnings about deprecated config options, do

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [CI] Cinder/Ceph CI setup

2014-11-27 Thread Derek Higgins
On 27/11/14 10:21, Duncan Thomas wrote: I'd suggest starting by making it an extra job, so that it can be monitored for a while for stability without affecting what is there. we have to be careful here, adding an extra job for this is probably the safest option but tripleo CI resources are a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Alternate meeting time

2014-12-02 Thread Derek Higgins
On 02/12/14 14:10, James Polley wrote: Months ago, I pushed for us to alternate meeting times to something that was friendlier to me, so we started doing alternate weeks at 0700UTC. That worked well for me, but wasn't working so well for a few people in Europe, so we decided to give 0800UTC a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Alternate meeting time

2014-12-02 Thread Derek Higgins
On 02/12/14 15:12, Giulio Fidente wrote: On 12/02/2014 03:45 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 02/12/14 14:10, James Polley wrote: Months ago, I pushed for us to alternate meeting times to something that was friendlier to me, so we started doing alternate weeks at 0700UTC. That worked well for me

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] removing sudoers.d rules from disk-image-builder

2013-07-24 Thread Derek Higgins
+1 to removing the suders rules we have, there adding overhead and contain enough wildcards that all they do is give people a false sense of security On 23/07/13 17:39, Chris Jones wrote: Hi On 23 July 2013 10:52, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] removing sudoers.d rules from disk-image-builder

2013-07-25 Thread Derek Higgins
On 25/07/13 09:41, Chris Jones wrote: Hi On 24 July 2013 22:18, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com mailto:der...@redhat.com wrote: - setup passwordless sudo or Doesn't sound like a super awesome option to me, it places an ugly security problem on anyone wanting to set this up anywhere

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI report : 1/11/2014 - 4/12/2014

2014-12-08 Thread Derek Higgins
On 04/12/14 13:37, Dan Prince wrote: On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 11:51 +, Derek Higgins wrote: A month since my last update, sorry my bad since the last email we've had 5 incidents causing ci failures 26/11/2014 : Lots of ubuntu jobs failed over 24 hours (maybe half) - We seem to suffer any

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Bug squashing followup

2014-12-18 Thread Derek Higgins
While bug squashing yesterday, I went through quite a lot of bugs closing those that were already fixed or no longer relevant, closing around 40 bugs. I eventually ran out of time, but I'm pretty sure if we split the task up between us we could weed out a lot more. What I'd like to do is, as a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] How do the CI clouds work?

2014-12-18 Thread Derek Higgins
On 18/12/14 08:48, Steve Kowalik wrote: Hai, I am finding myself at a loss at explaining how the CI clouds that run the tripleo jobs work from end-to-end. I am clear that we have a tripleo deployment running on those racks, with a seed, a HA undercloud and overcloud, but then I'm left

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] update on Puppet integration in Kilo

2015-02-18 Thread Derek Higgins
On 11/02/15 17:06, Dan Prince wrote: I wanted to take a few minutes to go over the progress we've made with TripleO Puppet in Kilo so far. For those unfamilar with the efforts our initial goal was to be able to use Puppet as the configuration tool for a TripleO deployment stack. This is

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Bug squashing followup

2015-01-28 Thread Derek Higgins
a group of 15 bugs. thanks, Derek. On 18/12/14 11:25, Derek Higgins wrote: While bug squashing yesterday, I went through quite a lot of bugs closing those that were already fixed or no longer relevant, closing around 40 bugs. I eventually ran out of time, but I'm pretty sure if we split the task up

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Bug squashing followup

2015-01-05 Thread Derek Higgins
See below, We got only 5 people signed up, anybody else willing to join the effort ? TL;DR if your willing to assess about 15 tripleo related bugs to decide if they are still current then add your name to the etherpad. thanks, Derek On 18/12/14 11:25, Derek Higgins wrote: While bug squashing

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Switching CI back to amd64

2015-01-07 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to the list instead. We currently run our CI with on images built for i386, we took this decision a while back to save memory ( at the time is allowed us

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Switching CI back to amd64

2015-01-08 Thread Derek Higgins
On 07/01/15 23:41, Ben Nemec wrote: On 01/07/2015 11:29 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-01-07 02:51:41 -0800: Hi All, I intended to bring this up at this mornings meeting but the train I was on had no power sockets (and I had no battery) so sending to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] default region name

2015-01-08 Thread Derek Higgins
On 08/01/15 05:21, Zhou, Zhenzan wrote: Hi, Does anyone know why TripleO uses regionOne as default region name? A comment in the code says it's the default keystone uses. But I cannot find any regionOne in keystone code. Devstack uses RegionOne by default and I do see lots of RegionOne

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] CI outage

2015-03-30 Thread Derek Higgins
Tl;dr tripleo ci is back up and running, see below for more On 21/03/15 01:41, Dan Prince wrote: Short version: The RH1 CI region has been down since yesterday afternoon. We have a misbehaving switch and have file a support ticket with the vendor to troubleshoot things further. We hope to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Core reviewer update proposal

2015-05-05 Thread Derek Higgins
On 05/05/15 12:57, James Slagle wrote: Hi, I'd like to propose adding Giulio Fidente and Steve Hardy to TripleO Core. Giulio has been an active member of our community for a while. He worked on the HA implementation in the elements and recently has been making a lot of valuable contributions

Re: [openstack-dev] TripleO: CI down... SSL cert expired

2015-04-13 Thread Derek Higgins
On 11/04/15 14:02, Dan Prince wrote: Looks like our SSL certificate has expired for the currently active CI cloud. We are working on getting a new one generated and installed. Until then CI jobs won't get processed. A new cert has been installed in the last few minutes and ZUUL has started

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-08 Thread Derek Higgins
On 03/06/15 17:28, Haïkel wrote: 2015-06-03 17:23 GMT+02:00 Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org: i On 06/03/2015 12:41 AM, James E. Blair wrote: Hi, This came up at the TC meeting today, and I volunteered to provide an update from the discussion. I've just read the IRC logs. And there's one

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-03 Thread Derek Higgins
On 02/06/15 23:41, James E. Blair wrote: Hi, This came up at the TC meeting today, and I volunteered to provide an update from the discussion. In general, I think there is a lot of support for a packaging effort in OpenStack. The discussion here has been great; we need to answer a few

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-06-09 Thread Derek Higgins
On 09/06/15 10:37, Dirk Müller wrote: Hi Derek, 2015-06-09 0:34 GMT+02:00 Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com: This patch would result in 80 packaging repositories being pulled into gerrit. I personally would prefer to start with fewer but common packages between all RPM distros

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-05-29 Thread Derek Higgins
On 28/05/15 22:09, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 05/28/2015 02:53 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 28/05/15 12:07, Jaume Devesa wrote: Hi Thomas, Delorean is a tool to build rpm packages from master branches (maybe any branch?) of OpenStack projects. Check out here: https://www.rdoproject.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-05-29 Thread Derek Higgins
On 28/05/15 20:58, Paul Belanger wrote: On 05/27/2015 05:26 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 27/05/15 09:14, Thomas Goirand wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, tl;dr: - - We'd like to push distribution packaging of OpenStack on upstream gerrit with reviews

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-05-29 Thread Derek Higgins
On 29/05/15 02:54, Steve Kowalik wrote: On 29/05/15 06:41, Haïkel wrote: Here's the main script to rebuild a RPM package. https://github.com/openstack-packages/delorean/blob/master/scripts/build_rpm.sh The script basically uses rpmbuild to build packages, we could have a build_deb.sh that

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-05-27 Thread Derek Higgins
On 27/05/15 09:14, Thomas Goirand wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all, tl;dr: - - We'd like to push distribution packaging of OpenStack on upstream gerrit with reviews. - - The intention is to better share the workload, and improve the overall QA for packaging *and*

Re: [openstack-dev] [packaging] Adding packaging as an OpenStack project

2015-05-28 Thread Derek Higgins
that the rpm's are being built using rpmbuild inside a docker container, if expanding to add dep support this is where we could plug in sbuild. Regards, On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:40, Thomas Goirand wrote: Derek, Thanks for what you wrote. On 05/27/2015 11:26 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: 4

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

2015-08-19 Thread Derek Higgins
On 06/08/15 15:01, Dougal Matthews wrote: - Original Message - From: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Thursday, 6 August, 2015 1:12:42 PM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

2015-08-20 Thread Derek Higgins
://review.openstack.org/#/c/205479/ 3. pull in 3 repositories upstream https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215186/ There will be follow up patches after these but this will get the ball rolling thanks, Derek. On 23/07/15 07:40, Derek Higgins wrote: See below On 21/07/15 20:29, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

2015-08-24 Thread Derek Higgins
On 08/19/2015 06:42 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 06/08/15 15:01, Dougal Matthews wrote: - Original Message - From: Dan Prince dpri...@redhat.com To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Thursday, 6 August, 2015 1:12:42 PM Subject

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

2015-07-24 Thread Derek Higgins
On 24/07/15 00:56, James Slagle wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com wrote: See below On 21/07/15 20:29, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

2015-07-21 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to now all the instack work has been done downstream of tripleo as part of rdo. Having parts of our deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

2015-07-22 Thread Derek Higgins
On 22/07/15 18:41, Gregory Haynes wrote: Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-07-21 19:29:49 +: Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream

2015-07-23 Thread Derek Higgins
See below On 21/07/15 20:29, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to now all the instack work has been done downstream of tripleo

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ian Wienand as core reviewer on diskimage-builder

2015-11-03 Thread Derek Higgins
On 03/11/15 15:25, Gregory Haynes wrote: Hello everyone, I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in reviews lately. Thus, I

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] trello

2015-09-08 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, Some of ye may remember some time ago we used to organize TripleO based jobs/tasks on a trello board[1], at some stage this board fell out of use (the exact reason I can't put my finger on). This morning I was putting a list of things together that need to be done in the area of CI

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Status of CI changes

2015-09-03 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, The patch to reshuffle our CI jobs has merged[1], along with the patch to switch the f21-noha job to be instack based[2] (with centos images). So the current status is that our CI has been removed from most of the non tripleo projects (with the exception of nova/neutron/heat and

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Status of CI changes

2015-09-08 Thread Derek Higgins
On 03/09/15 07:34, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, The patch to reshuffle our CI jobs has merged[1], along with the patch to switch the f21-noha job to be instack based[2] (with centos images). So the current status is that our CI has been removed from most of the non tripleo projects

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] trello

2015-09-10 Thread Derek Higgins
On 09/09/15 18:03, Jason Rist wrote: On 09/09/2015 07:09 AM, Derek Higgins wrote: On 08/09/15 16:36, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Some of ye may remember some time ago we used to organize TripleO based jobs/tasks on a trello board[1], at some stage this board fell out of use

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Current meeting timeslot

2015-09-10 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, The current meeting slot for TripleO is every second Tuesday @ 1900 UTC, since that time slot was chosen a lot of people have joined the team and others have moved on, I like to revisit the timeslot to see if we can accommodate more people at the meeting (myself included). Sticking

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] trello

2015-09-09 Thread Derek Higgins
On 08/09/15 16:36, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, Some of ye may remember some time ago we used to organize TripleO based jobs/tasks on a trello board[1], at some stage this board fell out of use (the exact reason I can't put my finger on). This morning I was putting a list of things

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Core reviewers for python-tripleoclient and tripleo-common

2015-09-10 Thread Derek Higgins
On 10/09/15 15:06, James Slagle wrote: TripleO has added a few new repositories, one of which is python-tripleoclient[1], the former python-rdomanager-oscplugin. With the additional repositories, there is an additional review burden on our core reviewers. There is also the fact that folks who

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Current meeting timeslot

2015-09-15 Thread Derek Higgins
On 10/09/15 15:12, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, The current meeting slot for TripleO is every second Tuesday @ 1900 UTC, since that time slot was chosen a lot of people have joined the team and others have moved on, I like to revisit the timeslot to see if we can accommodate more people

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Current meeting timeslot

2015-09-15 Thread Derek Higgins
On 15/09/15 12:38, Derek Higgins wrote: On 10/09/15 15:12, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, The current meeting slot for TripleO is every second Tuesday @ 1900 UTC, since that time slot was chosen a lot of people have joined the team and others have moved on, I like to revisit the timeslot

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] tripleo.org theme

2015-09-25 Thread Derek Higgins
On 25/09/15 13:34, Dan Prince wrote: It has come to my attention that we aren't making great use of our tripleo.org domain. One thing that would be useful would be to have the new tripleo-docs content displayed there. It would also be nice to have quick links to some of our useful resources,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-02 Thread Derek Higgins
n, Nov 30, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Zane Bitter <zbit...@redhat.com> wrote: > >Â Â Â On 30/11/15 12:51, Ruby Loo wrote: > >Â Â Â Â On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com >Â Â Â Â <mailto:der...@redhat.co

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Derek Higgins
On 30/11/15 17:03, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 11/30/2015 04:19 PM, Derek Higgins wrote: Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-11-30 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects. We'd like to investigate adding it back to heat and ironic as these are the two

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

2015-12-01 Thread Derek Higgins
On 30/11/15 22:18, Steven Hardy wrote: On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:51:53PM -0500, Ruby Loo wrote: On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: Hi All, Â Â A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that was based on i

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] Delopment environment census refresh

2016-06-14 Thread Derek Higgins
Hi All, A while back we populated a etherpad[1] with details of our individual development environments, the idea here was that we can point newcomers to this page to give them an idea of what hard ware its possible to deploy triple on and what tools we use drive it. Its been just over 3

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposal for a new tool: dlrn-repo

2016-06-13 Thread Derek Higgins
On 13 June 2016 at 21:29, Ben Nemec wrote: > So our documented repo setup steps are three curls, a sed, and a > multi-line bash command. And the best part? That's not even what we > test. The commands we actually use in tripleo.sh --repo-setup consist > of the

  1   2   >