Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Bug#1231298 - size parameter for volume creation

2014-08-11 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 8 August 2014 07:55, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: In cinderclient I think you're stuck with size as a mandatory argument to the 'cinder create' command, as you must be backward-compatible for at least a deprecation period.[0] Making an previously mandatory parameter optional, at

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Bug#1231298 - size parameter for volume creation

2014-08-12 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 11 August 2014 21:03, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Making an previously mandatory parameter optional, at least on the command line, does break backward compatibility though, does it? Everything

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] 3'rd party CI systems

2014-08-13 Thread Duncan Thomas
://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] Which program for Rally

2014-08-13 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 13 August 2014 13:57, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 01:45:17AM +0400, Boris Pavlovic wrote: Keystone, Glance, Cinder, Neutron and Heat are running rally performance jobs, that can be used for performance testing, benchmarking, regression testing

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

2014-08-14 Thread Duncan Thomas
@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-15 Thread Duncan Thomas
I've literally just finished the Cinder mid-cycle meetup (I'm still in my hotel room), and the value was huge and undeniable. Reading through this thread, I've just realised one massive advantage of the mid-cycle meetup that improved our productivity massively: it is in the middle of a cycle. We

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] new testtools breaking gate

2014-08-22 Thread Duncan Thomas
= =YavB -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-22 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 21 August 2014 19:39, gordon chung g...@live.ca wrote: from the pov of a project that seems to be brought up constantly and maybe it's my naivety, i don't really understand the fascination with branding and the stigma people have placed on non-'openstack'/stackforge projects. it can't be a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Nova]Quest about Cinder Brick proposal

2014-09-02 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 2 September 2014 04:56, Emma Lin l...@vmware.com wrote: Hi Gurus, I saw the wiki page for Cinder Brick proposal for Havana, but I didn’t see any follow up on that idea. Is there any real progress on that idea? As this proposal is to address the local storage issue, I’d like to know the

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo.db]A proposal for DB read/write separation

2014-09-02 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 11 August 2014 19:26, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: The above does not really make sense for MySQL Galera/PXC clusters *if only Galera nodes are used in the cluster*. Since Galera is synchronously replicated, there's no real point in segregating writers from readers, IMO. Better to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Nova]Quest about Cinder Brick proposal

2014-09-03 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 3 September 2014 01:20, Emma Lin l...@vmware.com wrote: Thank you all for the prompt response. And I’m glad to see the progress on this topic. Basically, what I’m thinking is the local storage support for big data and large scale computing is specially useful. I’ll monitor the meeting

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Nova]Quest about Cinder Brick proposal

2014-09-03 Thread Duncan Thomas
Emma I encourage you to join the cinder RIC channel, #openstack-cinder, on the freenode irc network (irc.freenode.net) to ask questions, you'll get much more interactive feedback there. Regards -- Duncan ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-04 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 4 September 2014 16:00, Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com wrote: My only question is about the need to separate out each virt driver into a separate project, wouldn't you accomplish a lot of the benefit by creating a single virt project that includes all of the drivers? I don't think there's

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Cinder plans for kilo: attention new driver authors!

2014-09-04 Thread Duncan Thomas
/cinder-meetup-summer-2014 [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-kilo-stabilisation-work -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra][Cinder] Coraid CI system

2014-09-05 Thread Duncan Thomas
you in advance. -- Best regards, Mykola Grygoriev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-11 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 11 September 2014 12:36, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: I continue to not understand how N non overlapping teams makes this any better. You have to pay the integration cost somewhere. Right now we're trying to pay it 1 patch at a time. This model means the integration units get much

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [clients] [keystone] lack of retrying tokens leads to overall OpenStack fragility

2014-09-11 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 11 September 2014 03:17, Angus Lees g...@inodes.org wrote: (As inspired by eg kerberos) 2. Ensure at some environmental/top layer that the advertised token lifetime exceeds the timeout set on the request, before making the request. This implies (since there's no special handling in place)

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron][cinder] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-11 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 11 September 2014 15:35, James Bottomley james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote: OK, so look at a concrete example: in 2002, the Linux kernel went with bitkeeper precisely because we'd reached the scaling limit of a single integration point, so we took the kernel from a single

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Request for J3 Feature Freeze Exception

2014-09-11 Thread Duncan Thomas
with this after cert results are provided. [1] - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110236/ -- Mike Perez ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Request for J3 FFE - add reset-state function for backups

2014-09-12 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 12 September 2014 09:54, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: At this point, unless it's critical to the success of the release (like, it completes a feature that is 99% there, or it increases consistency by plugging a feature gap, or it fixes a potential security vulnerability), I

Re: [openstack-dev] tempest error

2014-09-16 Thread Duncan Thomas
(failures=26) Regrads Nikesh ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [clients] [keystone] lack of retrying tokens leads to overall OpenStack fragility

2014-09-17 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 16 September 2014 01:28, Nathan Kinder nkin...@redhat.com wrote: The idea would be to leave normal tokens with a smaller validity period (like the current default of an hour), but also allow one-time use tokens to be requested. Cinder backup makes many requests to swift during a backup, one

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] - what integration with Keystone is allowed?

2014-09-23 Thread Duncan Thomas
of work once the end of the blockage is removed, neither of which is desirable. I'd rather not have convenience labels on the backend array than increase the risks of this sort of failure mode. -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

[openstack-dev] [cinder] PTL Candidacy

2014-09-23 Thread Duncan Thomas
significant dividends in that area - state machine, cinder agent, decoupling of drivers and connector types. I have always encouraged anybody to reach out to me with questions and concerns, and continue to do so. I look forward to continuing the great work we've been doing. Regards -- Duncan Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

2014-09-23 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 22 September 2014 23:14, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote: I am not at all sure we've prevented other flowers blooming - and I hate the idea that we have done that. I've certainly sat around at discussions which shut down hard with somebody making the statement that 'that is

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Not seeking another term as PTL

2014-09-23 Thread Duncan Thomas
pleasure and honor for me. It's been a pleasure to work with you this far, and I hope to continue doing so. You've seen Cinder through its birthing pains and into a mature project, and done a great job doing so. Cheers for all the hard work. -- Duncan Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] weekly meeting

2013-12-18 Thread Duncan Thomas
-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Get volumes REST API with filters and limit

2014-03-04 Thread Duncan Thomas
@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] rpc concurrency control rfc

2014-03-04 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 28 November 2013 10:14, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: For this specific block zero'ing case it occurred to me that it might be sufficient to just invoke 'ionice dd' instead of 'dd' and give it a lower I/O priority class than normal. Excuse the thread necromancy, I've just

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py

2014-03-12 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 15 January 2014 18:53, Brant Knudson b...@acm.org wrote: At no point do I care what are the different commits that are being brought in from oslo-incubator. If the commits are listed in the commit message then I feel an obligation to verify that they got the right commits in the message

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-12 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 11 March 2014 09:09, Zhangleiqiang zhangleiqi...@huawei.com wrote: For example, one tenant's volume quota is five, and has 5 volumes and 1 snapshot already. If the data in base volume of the snapshot is corrupted, the user will need to create a new volume from the snapshot, but this

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][db][performance] Proposal: Get rid of soft deletion (step by step)

2014-03-13 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 12 March 2014 17:35, Tim Bell tim.b...@cern.ch wrote: And if the same mistake is done for a cinder volume or a trove database ? Deferred deletion for cinder has been proposed, and there have been few objections to it... nobody has put forward code yet, but anybody is welcome to do so.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py

2014-03-14 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 14 March 2014 16:10, Jay S Bryant jsbry...@us.ibm.com wrote: -- Duncan, It is important to know what commits are being brought over to help provide a pointer to -- the possible cause of subsequent bugs that arise. I.E. if we sync up the DB, there is a commit for fixing -- db connection

Re: [openstack-dev] Duplicate code for processing REST APIs

2014-03-14 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 13 March 2014 21:13, Roman Podoliaka rpodoly...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi Steven, Code from openstack/common/ dir is 'synced' from oslo-incubator. The 'sync' is effectively a copy of oslo-incubator subtree into a project source tree. As syncs are not done at the same time, the code of synced

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-14 Thread Duncan Thomas
ideas? This has been discussed in various cinder meetings and summits multiple times. The end answer is 'no, we don't support that. If you want to keep the snapshot, you need to keep the volume too'. -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] non-persistent storage(after stopping VM, data will be rollback automatically), do you think we shoud introduce this feature?

2014-03-14 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 7 March 2014 08:17, Yuzhou (C) vitas.yuz...@huawei.com wrote: First, generally, in public or private cloud, the end users of VMs have no right to create new VMs directly. If someone want to create new VMs, he or she need to wait for approval process. Then, the administrator Of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about Raw Device Mapping

2014-03-21 Thread Duncan Thomas
/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] non-persistent storage(after stopping VM, data will be rollback automatically), do you think we shoud introduce this feature?

2014-03-21 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 17 March 2014 11:34, Yuzhou (C) vitas.yuz...@huawei.com wrote: Hi Duncan Thomas, Maybe the statement about approval process is not very exact. In fact in my mail, I mean: In the enterprise private cloud, if beyond the quota, you want to create a new VM ,that needs to wait

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature about QEMU Assisted online-extend volume

2014-03-27 Thread Duncan Thomas
@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][scheduler] Availability Zones and Host aggregates..

2014-03-27 Thread Duncan Thomas
On Mar 26, 2014 6:46 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Personally, I feel it is a mistake to continue to use the Amazon concept of an availability zone in OpenStack, as it brings with it the connotation from AWS EC2 that each zone is an independent failure domain. This characteristic of

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]Persistance layer for cinder + taskflow

2014-03-28 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 28 March 2014 14:38, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.com wrote: An idea that might be good to do is to start off using SQLite as the taskflow persistence backend. Get that working using SQLite files (which should be fine as a persistence method for most usages) and then after this works

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Feature about QEMU Assisted online-extend volume

2014-03-31 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 29 March 2014 02:49, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) zhangleiqi...@huawei.com wrote: Hi, Duncan: Thanks for your advice. About the summit session you mentioned, what things can I do for it ? If you (or a colleague who can speak on your behalf) is going to the summit, then go to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-docs] [cinder] recover Sheepdog documentation

2014-04-01 Thread Duncan Thomas
___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]a question about os-volume_upload_image

2014-04-03 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 3 April 2014 08:28, 王宏 w.wangho...@gmail.com wrote: I agree. Actually, I already have a BP on it: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/restore-image. I am happy for any suggestion. Needs a little thought since container_format and some other fields will need to be regenerated (e.g.

Re: [openstack-dev] Support for multiple sort keys and sort directions in REST GET APIs

2014-04-06 Thread Duncan Thomas
is useful, especially from one of the Horizon sessions I heard in Hong Kong for filtering/sorting. -- Mike Perez On 11:18 Thu 03 Apr , Duncan Thomas wrote: Some of the cinder APIs do weird database joins and double lookups and things, making every field sortable might have some serious

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]a question about os-volume_upload_image

2014-04-06 Thread Duncan Thomas
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]a question about os-volume_upload_image

2014-04-06 Thread Duncan Thomas
to do next? Waiting for approving for this blueprint? Or see others' opinions on this before we putting more efforts in achieving this? I just want to make sure that we could handle other people's use cases and not just our own. 2014-04-03 18:12 GMT+08:00 Duncan Thomas duncan.tho

Re: [openstack-dev] [Hyper-V] Havana status

2013-10-15 Thread Duncan Thomas
, and often far more limited, than the concerns of somebody who reviews many drivers and core code changes. -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Hyper-V] Havana status

2013-10-15 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 11 October 2013 20:51, Rochelle.Grober rochelle.gro...@huawei.com wrote: Proposed solution: There have been a couple of solutions proposed. I’m presenting a merged/hybrid solution that may work · Create a new repository for the extra drivers: o Keep kvm and Xenapi in the Nova

Re: [openstack-dev] [Hyper-V] Havana status

2013-10-15 Thread Duncan Thomas
. The more people do that, the faster things go for everybody. The higher rate tax is being a core reviewer, but that comes with certain advantages too. -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder: create volume hold 'error' state.

2013-10-24 Thread Duncan Thomas
, ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Propose Jay Bryant for core

2013-10-30 Thread Duncan Thomas
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Glance] OSLO update

2013-11-18 Thread Duncan Thomas
___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Glance] OSLO update

2013-11-22 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 22 November 2013 12:27, Elena Ezhova eezh...@mirantis.com wrote: But what if I want to update some module that consists of ten or even more files (like rpc or db) and each of these files has quite a long change log? In that case the commit message may turn out to be really long even if only

Re: [openstack-dev] [Oslo] Improving oslo-incubator update.py

2013-11-22 Thread Duncan Thomas
module at a time, because it makes it far harder to review and spot problems, so some from of automation of this would be great. -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [openstack-dev] use of the word certified

2014-06-13 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 10 June 2014 17:53, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:09 +0100, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 10 June 2014 15:07, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: Exposing which configurations are actively tested is a perfectly sane thing to do. I don't see why you

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Review days? (open to ANYBODY and EVERYBODY)

2014-06-13 Thread Duncan Thomas
/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-16 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 16 June 2014 17:30, Jason Rist jr...@redhat.com wrote: I'm going to have to agree with Tomas here. There doesn't seem to be any reasonable expectation of backwards compatibility for the reasons he outlined, despite some downstream releases that may be impacted. Backward compatibility is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-16 Thread Duncan Thomas
. If I've got the wrong expectations, I'd at least like to have the correction on record. Regards -- Duncan Thomas On 16 June 2014 17:58, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Duncan Thomas's message of 2014-06-16 09:41:49 -0700: On 16 June 2014 17:30, Jason Rist jr...@redhat.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] A modest proposal to reduce reviewer load

2014-06-17 Thread Duncan Thomas
EA19 D33C 3490 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] A modest proposal to reduce reviewer load

2014-06-18 Thread Duncan Thomas
then it is only going to take moments for the second core to review it, so the saving really is negligible compared to the risk. -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] A modest proposal to reduce reviewer load

2014-06-18 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 18 June 2014 15:28, Matthew Booth mbo...@redhat.com wrote: On 18/06/14 13:31, Sean Dague wrote: Even with 2 +2s you do the wrong thing. Yesterday we landed baremetal tests that broke ironic. It has a ton of +1s from people that have been working on those tests. This is slightly off topic,

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Backwards compatibility policy for our projects

2014-06-19 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 19 June 2014 10:01, Giulio Fidente gfide...@redhat.com wrote: From a the 10.000 feet view, I can imagine people relying on a stable API for services like Cinder but I don't see how that applies to TripleO Why should one try to install an older version of OpenStack using some 'recent'

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][libvirt] Block migrations and Cinder volumes

2014-06-19 Thread Duncan Thomas
/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Driver] Delete snapshot

2014-06-19 Thread Duncan Thomas
/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Driver] Delete snapshot

2014-06-19 Thread Duncan Thomas
/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSSG] Best tool for simple security gate checks

2014-06-19 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 19 June 2014 19:21, Travis McPeak travis_mcp...@symantec.com wrote: Hi all, In the OpenStack Security Group (OSSG) we¹ve been kicking around the idea of getting some simple non-blocking security-related gate tests going. These tests would be designed to be simple and automated checks for

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Minimum Driver Features for juno

2014-06-20 Thread Duncan Thomas
. -- Thanks Regards, Yogesh Prasad. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] 答复: [Heat] fine grained quotas

2014-06-20 Thread Duncan Thomas
-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] About storing volume format info for filesystem-based drivers

2014-06-23 Thread Duncan Thomas
___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] About storing volume format info for filesystem-based drivers

2014-06-24 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 24 June 2014 16:42, Avishay Traeger avis...@stratoscale.com wrote: One more reason why block storage management doesn't really work on file systems. I'm OK with storing the format, but that just means you fail migration/backup operations with different formats, right? Actually I think

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][volume/manager.py] volume driver mapping

2014-06-25 Thread Duncan Thomas
driver. Thanks Regards, Yogesh Prasad. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] volume creation faild.

2014-06-26 Thread Duncan Thomas
Regards, Yogesh Prasad. ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][volume/manager.py] volume driver mapping

2014-06-26 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 26 June 2014 05:46, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com wrote: This seems cool. Does it mean the storage vendors write their new drivers just map it from cinder.conf ? Correct. You can cause devstack to set up cinder.conf for you by setting CINDER_DRIVER=cinder.volume.drivers.foo.bar in

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] volume creation failed.

2014-06-26 Thread Duncan Thomas
for each type of logs. like cinder-api, cinder-scheduler and cinder-volume logs. On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: I'm afraid that isn't the log we need to diagnose your problem. Can you put cinder-api, cinder-scheduler and cinder-volume logs up

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][glance] Update volume-image-metadata proposal

2014-06-27 Thread Duncan Thomas
this code cleanup be done separate from the update volume-Image-metadata update bp or should be a work item of it? -Original Message- From: Duncan Thomas [mailto:duncan.tho...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 7:29 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-07-01 Thread Duncan Thomas
of success in our 3rd party guidelines: Passes every test in tempest-dsm-full. If that needs documenting somewhere else, please let me know. It may of course change as we learn more about how 3rd party CI works out, so the fewer places it is duplicated the better, maybe? -- Duncan Thomas

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-07-01 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 1 July 2014 14:44, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 07/01/2014 05:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: For the record, cinder gave a very clear definition of success in our 3rd party guidelines: Passes every test in tempest-dsm-full. If that needs documenting somewhere else, please let me

Re: [openstack-dev] [Jenkins] [Cinder] InvocationError in gate-cinder-python26 python27

2014-07-04 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 30 June 2014 07:47, Steve Kowalik ste...@wedontsleep.org wrote: Personally, I think generating and comparing a sample config every build is daft, and a sample configuration should be generated during sdist or something. This argument has gone back and forth several times. There is definite

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-07-04 Thread Duncan Thomas
of the word 'tested' - how long until edits can be made to the cinder wiki to comply with that agreement? It's a wiki - anybody who cares enough can go and re-word it... -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][all] autosync incubator to projects

2014-07-04 Thread Duncan Thomas
PGP SIGNATURE- ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [olso] olso incubator logging issues

2014-07-09 Thread Duncan Thomas
for a few taskflow integration bits - we'd do better froma stability point of view to ignore OSLO all together and do our own thing. -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin

Re: [openstack-dev] Can not create cinder volume

2014-07-14 Thread Duncan Thomas
information. Regards, Johnson ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][specs] Please stop doing specs for any changes in projects

2014-07-14 Thread Duncan Thomas
the lightweight process and skip the spec if they don't expect to need one. -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Can not create cinder volume

2014-07-15 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 15 July 2014 08:24, Johnson Cheng johnson.ch...@qsantechnology.com wrote: I have two questions here, 1. It still has “Error encountered during initialization of driver: LVMISCSIDriver” error message in cinder-volume.log, how to fix this issue? 2. From cinder-scheduler.log, it

Re: [openstack-dev] Can not create cinder volume

2014-07-15 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 15 July 2014 11:59, Johnson Cheng johnson.ch...@qsantechnology.com wrote: May I ask you another question that how cinder choose volume node to create volume if I have multi volume nodes? For example, when controller node and compute node are alive, the volume will be created at compute

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][specs] Please stop doing specs for any changes in projects

2014-07-15 Thread Duncan Thomas
on the whiteboard of the vluprint/bug. Then a quick discussion there could be used to define if a SPEC would be needed. Launchpad has proven terrible for this, which is a strong driver for the spec process in the first place -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] cinder querying nova-api

2014-07-16 Thread Duncan Thomas
, ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][specs] Please stop doing specs for any changes in projects

2014-07-16 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 16 July 2014 03:57, Jay S. Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: John, So you have said a few times that the specs are a learning process. What do you feel with have learned thus far using specs? I'm not John, but I'm going to answer as if you'd addressed the question wider: - Specs

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] cinder querying nova-api

2014-07-17 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 17 July 2014 08:36, Abbass MAROUNI abbass.maro...@virtualscale.fr wrote: Thanks Thomas, What I'm trying to achieve is the following : To be able to create a VM on a host (that's a compute and volume host at the same time) then call cinder and let it find the host and create and attach

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Integrated with iSCSI target Question

2014-07-21 Thread Duncan Thomas
/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Rally] PTL Candidacy

2014-07-21 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 21 July 2014 21:38, Boris Pavlovic bpavlo...@mirantis.com wrote: Hi, I would like to propose my candidacy for Rally PTL. I've been working with Boris on both Rally and the associated OSProfiler code, and I can confirm he is dedicated, very open to ideas and contributions, and I heartily

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack] [Barbican] Cinder and Barbican

2014-07-22 Thread Duncan Thomas
No. There a blueprint in to do the integration, but no code merged yet let alone documentation. Duncan Thomas On Jul 22, 2014 4:42 PM, Giuseppe Galeota giuseppegale...@gmail.com wrote: Dear all, is Cinder capable today to use Barbican for encryption? If yes, can you link to me some useful doc

[openstack-dev] Looking for Coraid cinder contact

2014-07-23 Thread Duncan Thomas
Hi I'm looking for a maintainer email address for the cinder coraid driver. http://stackalytics.com/report/driverlog?project_id=openstack%2Fcinder just lists it as Alyseo team with no contact details. Thanks -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Looking for Coraid cinder contact

2014-07-25 Thread Duncan Thomas
That is indeed my aim, and thanks for following up On 25 July 2014 15:29, Yacine Kheddache yac...@alyseo.com wrote: Le 23/07/2014 22:31, Duncan Thomas a écrit : Hi I'm looking for a maintainer email address for the cinder coraid driver. http://stackalytics.com/report/driverlog?project_id

Re: [openstack-dev] volume driver submission deadline for juno

2014-07-28 Thread Duncan Thomas
late. -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] tempest api volume test failed

2014-07-29 Thread Duncan Thomas
(failures=10) ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Glance Store Future

2014-08-04 Thread Duncan Thomas
Duncan Thomas On Aug 1, 2014 9:44 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Yup. Though I'd love for this code to live in olso, not glance... Why Oslo? There seems to be a general obsession with getting things into Oslo, but our (cinder team) general experiences with the end result have been

Re: [openstack-dev] Which program for Rally

2014-08-06 Thread Duncan Thomas
-- Duncan Thomas ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-07 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 7 August 2014 16:39, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Eric Harney ehar...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/07/2014 09:55 AM, John Griffith wrote: There are three things that have just crushed productivity and motivation in Cinder this release

  1   2   3   4   5   >