The link does not work for me!
Edgar
From: tfre...@redhat.commailto:tfre...@redhat.com
tfre...@redhat.commailto:tfre...@redhat.com
Organization: Red Hat
Reply-To: tfre...@redhat.commailto:tfre...@redhat.com
tfre...@redhat.commailto:tfre...@redhat.com, OpenStack Development Mailing
List (not
Great initiative.
I added my name and also which location will work better, I would suggest
all developers interested on this meeting to do the same.
Edgar
On 4/15/14, 6:54 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote:
Folks:
Given all the talk of mid-cycle meetings, I'd like to propose
Yeah! Let¹s do it in Barcelona, maybe Midokura can host it. :-)
Edgar
On 4/15/14, 11:12 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@vmware.com wrote:
Hi,
Any chance of doing this in Europe?
Thanks
Gary
On 4/16/14 4:54 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote:
Folks:
Given all the talk of mid-cycle
I second Kyle on this,
Quite more clear for users to see the version error message on the logs!
Edgar
On 4/17/14, 7:23 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Terry Wilson twil...@redhat.com wrote:
A question about the fix from
Folks,
I think is correct to have Service VMs on a separate project because it
seems to me a very specific implementation (form factor) of a Service
Insertion use case.
However, there are few interesting services sessions proposed for the
summit intended to enhance all areas of the ³Networking
I don’t think this is the right mailing list for this question.
Contrail is not supported in Icehouse release. You may want to contact Juniper
people directly.
Edgar
From: Michał Dubiel m...@semihalf.commailto:m...@semihalf.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Using OVS with nova-nework will bring you more issues that what you are
expected.
Security groups will not work and other L3 capabilities.
Edgar
From: laserjetyang laserjety...@gmail.commailto:laserjety...@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Great Idea Terry!
Edgar
On 5/6/14, 6:07 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Manish Godara wrote:
Sounds like a good idea to me. Is the pod area for neutron-specific
discussions?
Each program (including Networking (Neutron)) has an assigned pod
(round table). So the Networking
I ran the tests in my dev server and I noticed the decrease in memory
consumption. Very good job Maru!
The patch has been approved!
Edgar
From: Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.commailto:sorla...@nicira.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
+1
It is easier to match spec with codenames
On 5/23/14, 3:27 AM, James E. Blair jebl...@openstack.org wrote:
Hi,
With apologies to the specs repos we just created, the more I think
about this, the more I think that the right answer is that we should
stick with codenames for the spec repos.
Chen,
Let me know if I can help on anything!
I see that Gary and Rosella already sent you good pointers to get involve in
Neutron development but I am happy to help if needed.
Edgar
From: Rossella Sblendido rsblend...@suse.commailto:rsblend...@suse.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing
+1 for Carl! He is a great developer
Edgar
Neutron cores, please vote +1/-1 for the proposed addition of Carl
Baldwin to Neutron core.
I also wanted to mention the process for adding, removing, and
maintaining neutron-core membership is now documented on the wiki here
[3].
Thank you!
Kyle
My only comment is that the name of the topic should be:
bp/fsl-sdn-os-mech-driver
Instead of:
bp/https
I guss we can pass this..
Edgar
On 5/27/14, 9:23 AM, trinath.soman...@freescale.com
trinath.soman...@freescale.com wrote:
Hi Kyle
Kindly consider my BP spec
Nader,
My understanding is that you DO need a BP for those changes as well due to the
fact that neutron-client is a separate project but it should be easier to merge
because the main one in Neutron has been already approved.
Edgar
From: Nader Lahouti
I will take them!
Edgar
From: Tomoe Sugihara to...@midokura.commailto:to...@midokura.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Thursday, May 29, 2014 at 7:57 AM
To: OpenStack
I tried to book online and it seems that the pre-payment is non-refundable:
Hyatt.Com Rate Rate RulesFull prepayment required, non-refundable, no
date changes.
The price is $149 USD per night. Is that what you have blocked?
Edgar
On 6/4/14, 2:47 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com
Anne,
The VPN section looks completed but we are introducing new changes on the
services area.
I have been using Neutron team to include DocImpact on their commit messages to
keep track of news changes for the Docs. On the last Neutron IRC meeting we
have agreed that all commits missing
I do agree, bumping the dnsmasq version should not be a big deal and it
seems Aaron is already working on that.
Edgar
On 6/11/14, 8:24 AM, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 09:58:14AM EDT, Robert Li (baoli) wrote:
Hi,
With the right version of
18 matches
Mail list logo
