Re: [openstack-dev] [gantt] Scheduler group meeting - cancelled this week INTERNAL

Don Will there be a meeting next week? What is the regular time slot for the meeting? I'd like to work w you on a technical slide to use in Paris Do we need to socialize the Gantt topic more? Thx Uri (Oo-Ree) C: 949-378-7568 From: Dugger, Donald D [mailto:donald.d.dug...@intel.com] Sent:

[openstack-dev] [Nova] [Summit] proposed item for the crossproject and/ or Nova meetings in the Design summit

Today, OpenStack makes placement decision mainly based on Compute demands (Scheduler is part of Nova). It also uses some info provided about platform's Compute capabilities. But for a given application (consists of some VMs, some Network appliances, some storage etc), Nova/Scheduler has no way

[openstack-dev] neutron roadmap

Hi Salvatore Would like to discuss with you your views on what services are needed and when and how to architect it etc I’d like to meet in Palo Alto, maybe 11/19? Thx Uri (“Oo-Ree”) C: 949-378-7568 ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] [Delegation] Meeting scheduling

interested Thx Uri (Oo-Ree) C: 949-378-7568 From: Tim Hinrichs [mailto:thinri...@vmware.com] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:05 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Congress] [Delegation] Meeting scheduling Hi all, The feedback on the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

ck.org>; Elzur, Uri <uri.el...@intel.com> Cc: Cathy Zhang <cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC Hi Uri, I originally wrote the Tacker->ODL SFC NSH piece and have been working with Tacker and networking-sfc team to bring it

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

of NSH in networking-SFC On 24 May 2016 at 21:53, Elzur, Uri <uri.el...@intel.com<mailto:uri.el...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi Tim Sorry for the delay due to travel... This note is very helpful! We are in agreement that the team including the individuals cited below are support

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Tim +1 for me (guess not surprising...) Thx Uri (“Oo-Ree”) C: 949-378-7568 -Original Message- From: Tim Rozet [mailto:tro...@redhat.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:24 AM To: Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com>; Elzur, Uri <uri.el...@intel.com> Cc: OpenStack Development

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

: Armando M. [mailto:arma...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 11:06 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On 24 May 2016 at 22:07, Elzur, Uri &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

upport of NSH in networking-SFC On 20 May 2016 at 17:37, Elzur, Uri <uri.el...@intel.com<mailto:uri.el...@intel.com>> wrote: Hi Armando, Cathy, All First I apologize for the delay, returning from a week long international trip. (yes, I know, a lousy excuse on many accounts…)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

) <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC On 25 May 2016 at 12:29, Elzur, Uri <uri.el...@intel.com<mailto:uri.el...@intel.com>> wrote: Armando I’m asking for a clear answer “I think the position

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Few comments below Thx Uri ("Oo-Ree") C: 949-378-7568 -Original Message- From: Yang, Yi Y [mailto:yi.y.y...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 5:20 PM To: Cathy Zhang ; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Cathy So we are ok moving forward on networking-sfc? What is the next step from your pov? Thx Uri ("Oo-Ree") C: 949-378-7568 -Original Message- From: Cathy Zhang [mailto:cathy.h.zh...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 11:58 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Pls note that VXLAN-gpe and VXLAN are using different UDP ports. Lots of consideration and discussion went into this working on the IETF draft and on ODL implementations. So I'm not sure I follow the backwards compatibility issues raised below In any rate, the Ovs-Eth-NSH could be making

Re: [openstack-dev] support of NSH in networking-SFC

+1 from me too How do we close on this thread? Is anyone on the ml, NOT cool with this approach as outlined by Tim below? Thx Uri ("Oo-Ree") C: 949-378-7568 -Original Message- From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 8:48 AM To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Hi Ben Any guidance you can offer will be appreciated. The process has taken long time and precious cycles. How can we get to a coordinated Kernel and OvS approach to avoid the challenges and potentially misaligned advise we got (per Yi Yang's mail)? Thx Uri ("Oo-Ree") C: 949-378-7568

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [networking-sfc] Network-sfc project f2f2 meet-up place and time

Can you pls add more detailed minutes as to emerging agreements/understandings? Thx Uri ("Oo-Ree") C: 949-378-7568 -Original Message- From: Akihiro Motoki [mailto:amot...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 11:50 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][TC] support of NSH in networking-SFC

all backends are closed-source, it’s not open as openstack defines it: https://governance.openstack.org/reference/opens.html There isn’t any wiggle room there. This isn’t a neutron argument; feel free to take it up with the TC. Thanks, doug On May 20, 2016, at 6:37 PM, Elzur, Uri <uri.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

to have any OVS related new features developed inside the OVS community. Thanks, Cathy From: Elzur, Uri [mailto:uri.el...@intel.com<mailto:uri.el...@intel.com>] Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 3:02 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Armando M Subject: [openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

;Armando M." <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 May 2016 at 16:10, Elzur, Uri <uri.el...@intel.com> wrote: > > > Hi Cathy > > > > > > > > Thank you for the quick response. This is the essence of my question > > – does Neutron keep OvS as a

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

Hi Armando As an industry we are working on SFC for 3 years or so (more?). Still to date, we are told we can’t get Neutron or even a Stadium project e.g. networking-SFC to support NSH (in IETF LC phase) because OvS has not supported NSH. Is this an official position of Neutron that OvS is the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH in networking-SFC

to have any OVS related new features developed inside the OVS community. Thanks, Cathy From: Elzur, Uri [mailto:uri.el...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, May 13, 2016 3:02 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Armando M Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] support of NSH i