[openstack-dev] Debugging Devstack Neutron with Pycharm

2014-06-09 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, I am trying to debug devstack Neutron with Pycharm, i have found here ( https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronDevelopment#How_to_debug_Neutron_.28and_other_OpenStack_projects_probably_.29 ) That i need to change the neutron server code to this= eventlet.monkey_patch() To:

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Debugging Devstack Neutron with Pycharm

2014-06-09 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, I am trying to debug devstack Neutron with Pycharm, i have found here ( https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronDevelopment#How_to_debug_Neutron_.28and_other_OpenStack_projects_probably_.29 ) That i need to change the neutron server code to this= eventlet.monkey_patch() To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Debugging Devstack Neutron with Pycharm

2014-06-11 Thread Gal Sagie
No one that is using PyCharm/Eclipse and able to debug the code? :( - Original Message - From: Gal Sagie gsa...@vmware.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 1:59:05 PM Subject: [openstack-dev][Neutron] Debugging Devstack Neutron with Pycharm Hello all

[openstack-dev] [openstack][neutron] Debugging L3 Agent with PyCharm

2015-03-18 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, I am trying to debug the L3-agent code with pycharm, but the debugger doesnt stop on my break points. I have enabled PyCharm Gevent compatible debugging but that doesnt solve the issue (I am able to debug neutron server correctly) Anyone might know what is the problem? Thanks Gal.

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][neutron] Debugging L3 Agent with PyCharm

2015-03-19 Thread Gal Sagie
at 10:16 AM, Gal Sagie gal.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I am trying to debug the L3-agent code with pycharm, but the debugger doesnt stop on my break points. I have enabled PyCharm Gevent compatible debugging but that doesnt solve the issue (I am able to debug neutron server correctly

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][QoS] Neutron QoS (Quality Of Service) Update

2015-05-07 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, I think that the Neutron QoS effort is progressing into critical point and i asked Miguel if i could post an update on our progress. First, i would like to thank Sean and Miguel for running this effort and everyone else that is involved, i personally think its on the right track,

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron API rate limiting

2015-05-15 Thread Gal Sagie
] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151247/ [3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-neutron-sg-fwaas-future-direction On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Rick Jones rick.jon...@hp.com wrote: On May 14, 2015 9:26 PM, Gal Sagie gal.sa...@gmail.commailto: gal.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Ryan, We

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Neutron API rate limiting

2015-05-14 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello Ryan, We have proposed a spec to liberty to add rate limit functionality to security groups [1]. We see two big use cases for it, one as you mentioned is DDoS for east-west and another is brute force prevention (for example port scanning). We are re-writing the spec as an extension to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Liberty mid-cycle coding sprint

2015-04-14 Thread Gal Sagie
+1 For the sprint in Tel Aviv, count me in :) On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: I know we're not even at the Liberty Design Summit in Vancouver yet, but I wanted to take this time

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Regarding Flow classifiers existing proposals

2015-06-05 Thread Gal Sagie
Another use case is for security/firewall classifiers. I agree with this and i think me and Miguel talked about it in the summit, but in order for this to go forward someone need to start creating a spec and managing this effort. Since you proposed it first Vikram, will you do it? If not i will

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [QOS] Request for Additional QoS capabilities

2015-06-23 Thread Gal Sagie
these protections are critical so we are more concerned with having the ability to protect against these cases than the specific API or service it falls under. Yes we would be interested in working together to get this pushed through. John *From:* Gal Sagie [mailto:gal.sa...@gmail.com] *Sent

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack][Neutron][OVN] OVN-Neutron - TODO List

2015-06-14 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi Salvatore, Thanks for the comments, added some more information. Gal On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com wrote: Gal, thanks for this summery. Some additional info inline. Salvatore On 12 June 2015 at 19:38, Gal Sagie gal.sa...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [QOS] Request for Additional QoS capabilities

2015-06-17 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi John, We were trying to push a very similar spec to enhance the security group API, we covered both DDoS case and another use case for brute force prevention (We did a research to identify common protocols login behaviour in order to identify brute force attacks using iptables) and even some

[openstack-dev] [Openstack][Neutron][OVN] OVN-Neutron - TODO List

2015-06-12 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, I wanted to share some of our next working items and hopefully get more people on board with the project. I personally would mentor any new comer that wants to get familiar with the project and help with any of these items. You can also feel free to approach Russell Bryant

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Impressions from Vancouver Neutron Design Summits

2015-05-28 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, I wanted to very briefly share my thoughts and a suggestion regarding the Neutron design summits (maybe only for the next one, but still..) I would first like to say that i was amazed by the number of people that attended the summit, it was really great to see it and it was very nice

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [fwaas] - Collecting use cases for API improvements

2015-05-28 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, The session talk was mainly about merging the Security Group API and the FWaaS API to the same one or to keep them separate, Which i don't think we reached agreement (or did we? :) ) I personally think (And few people approached us in the summit to express that they feel the same)

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Impressions from Vancouver Neutron Design Summits

2015-05-28 Thread Gal Sagie
sure we take advantage of that. On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Gal Sagie gal.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello All, I wanted to very briefly share my thoughts and a suggestion regarding the Neutron design summits (maybe only for the next one, but still..) I would first like to say that i

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] How to catch security group updates in ML2 mechanism driver?

2015-06-29 Thread Gal Sagie
Yes, look at this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/174588/ On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Neil Jerram neil.jer...@metaswitch.com wrote: Hi there, For my team's networking backend, we want to catch security group updates in our ML2 mechanism driver code. Currently we're doing this

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] - Update Status

2015-08-13 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello everyone, I would like to give a short status update on Kuryr [1]. The project is starting to formalize, we already conducted two IRC meetings [2] to define the project first goals and road map goals, check the meetings logs and the agenda here [3] I think we see good amount of interest

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] FW: [Ryu-devel] [IMPORTANT]: Query regarding BGP Speaker and BGP Peer States.

2015-08-17 Thread Gal Sagie
Maybe its best to also send this to the Ryu mailing list On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Vikram Choudhary vikram.choudh...@huawei.com wrote: Widening audience! *From:* Vikram Choudhary [mailto:vikram.choudh...@huawei.com] *Sent:* 17 August 2015 18:05 *To:*

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Kuryr - virtual sprint

2015-08-19 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello everyone, During our last meeting an idea was brought up that we try to do a virtual sprint for Kuryr somewhere in September. Basically the plan is very similar to the mid cycle sprints or feature sprints where we iterate on couple of tasks online and finish gaps we might have in Kuryr. (I

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] binding information for networks

2015-08-19 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, Recently i have came across two use cases that having binding information, or metadata for networks can be useful. (similar to the port binding profile for that matter) For example: 1) In project Kuryr we want to have a binding information which maps the Neutron network to docker

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][api] - attaching arbitrary key/value pairs to resources

2015-08-24 Thread Gal Sagie
+1 I will alter the proposed spec to indicate that this shouldn't be consumed/used with backends specific data (similar to the way Nova tags indicate it) I see value (and described some use cases in the spec) for using this from the API level Gal. On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Russell

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Targeting Logging API for SG and FW rules feature to L-3 milestone

2015-08-20 Thread Gal Sagie
I think that before this can be applied to SG rules which are on the VM ports, there needs to be another spec in FWaaS which enable defining rules on VM ports, i am not sure something like that currently exists. (event that there are many use cases for such ability) Gal. On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] - Bringing Dockers networking to Neutron

2015-07-29 Thread Gal Sagie
[2] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org [image: Inactive hide details for Gal Sagie ---07/22/2015 12:31:46 PM---Hello Everyone, Project Kuryr is now officially part of Neutron]Gal Sagie ---07/22/2015 12:31:46 PM---Hello Everyone, Project Kuryr is now officially part of Neutron's big tent. From

[openstack-dev] Dragonflow - Weekly IRC Meeting

2015-07-28 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello Everyone, If you are not familiar with Dragonflow, it is a lightweight SDN controller embedded in Neutron that tries to solve distributed virtual routing the SDN way. Dragonflow is officially part of Neutron big tent starting at Kilo, you can read more information about it in the following

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][kuryr][magnum] Magnum/Kuryr Integration

2015-08-13 Thread Gal Sagie
Thanks Daneyon for raising the integration in your IRC meeting and for starting the ether pad. (i hope to attend your next online meeting) As requested i will start writing a detailed spec about Kuryr where everyone can add and comment. We already have a basic design document [1] describing the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][kuryr][magnum] Design Specification for Kuryr

2015-08-13 Thread Gal Sagie
Sure, will have it ready for review next week and put the link here for everyone. On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com wrote: Kyle, Can we please arrange for an official design

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][kuryr][magnum] Design Specification for Kuryr

2015-08-14 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi feisky, I think thats a great question, not because of port-mapping in particular :) but because we need to think on a feature by feature basis and map all the features the dockers API allow which we cannot support directly with Neutron API or its services sub-projects API. (apuimedo, maybe we

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][kuryr][magnum] Design Specification for Kuryr

2015-08-14 Thread Gal Sagie
break a lot of tooling that depends on -p. -- Adrian On Aug 14, 2015, at 6:57 AM, Gal Sagie gal.sa...@gmail.com wrote: Hi feisky, I think thats a great question, not because of port-mapping in particular :) but because we need to think on a feature by feature basis and map all

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] What does being a neutron-core member mean? [WAS: Re: [neutron] I am pleased to propose two new Neutron API/DB/RPC core reviewers!]

2015-08-14 Thread Gal Sagie
I don't want to jump in where i am not suppose to, and i know everyone saying it isn't personal, but i have had the pleasure to work with Russell on the OVN project for the last couple of months, i think his dedication to the project and Neutron, his understanding of what open source community

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] - Bringing Dockers networking to Neutron

2015-07-22 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello Everyone, Project Kuryr is now officially part of Neutron's big tent. Kuryr is aimed to be used as a generic docker remote driver that connects docker to Neutron API's and provide containerised images for the common Neutron plugins. We also plan on providing common additional networking

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] IRC Meeting - Canceled for next week (10/26)

2015-10-21 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello Everyone, Just wanted to share with anyone that wasn't in the meeting this week, that we decided to cancel the IRC meeting on the 10/26. See you all in the summit. Gal. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Gerrit permissions and Merge rights

2015-10-21 Thread Gal Sagie
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 21 October 2015 at 04:12, Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Do we also want to consider Project Kuryr part of this? >> > > No, why would we? > [Gal] Because

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-sfc] API clarification questions

2015-10-28 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi Pino, Just one note on the order of the pipeline, shouldnt the security part be before the service chaining (and also after)? (Unless you only meant egress security and you still do the ingress before) Gal. On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Giuseppe (Pino) de Candia < gdecan...@midokura.com>

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] - Design Summit etherpad

2015-11-01 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, It was great meeting everyone in the summit, it ended too fast.. We had a free design talk on Friday about Kuryr. (Thanks to everyone that participated) We have created this etherpad with all the related tasks: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-neutron-unplugged-track-kuryr If

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] mutihost networking with nova vm as docker host

2015-11-05 Thread Gal Sagie
The current OVS binding proposals are not for nested containers. I am not sure if you are asking about that case or about the nested containers inside a VM case. For the nested containers, we will use Neutron solutions that support this kind of configuration, for example if you look at OVN you

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-onos]: Proposing new cores for networking-onos

2015-11-05 Thread Gal Sagie
+1 for both from me On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Vikram Choudhary wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to propose Mr. Ramanjaneya Reddy Palleti and Mr. Dongfeng as > new cores for networking-onos project. Their contribution was significant > in the last Liberty cycle w.r.t to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Gerrit permissions and Merge rights

2015-10-21 Thread Gal Sagie
Do we also want to consider Project Kuryr part of this? We already started sending Kuryr spec to the Neutron repository and I think it would make sense to manage it as part of Neutron spec process. Any opinions on that? Gal. On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 11:10 PM, Armando M.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-ovn][l3] Add/delete router interface

2015-10-17 Thread Gal Sagie
plugin. This patch was initially worked on by > Gal Sagie (*https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206919/* > <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206919/>) and we took over > to take it completion. > > There are bunch of gate tests that are failing as a result of this > patch an

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Design Summit Session - Containers Orchestration platforms Integration with Neutron

2015-10-18 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, In OpenStack Tokyo summit we will have a design summit session for containers networking and containers orchestration engines integration with Neutron [1]. Please feel free to edit the session etherpad [2] with relevant topics, if you are working and have any gaps or needs from

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] - IRC Meetings

2015-10-06 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello Everyone, Our current IRC meeting time is 15:00 UTC every Monday. I have received several requests from US people saying its hard for them to attend at this early time. We want to allow anyone that shows interest in the project to join, so we discussed this in yesterday's IRC meeting and

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Proposing Taku Fukushima as Kuryr core

2015-10-13 Thread Gal Sagie
+1 Taku is a great addition to the team and hoping to see him continue deliver high quality contribution in all aspects of the project. On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Antoni Segura Puimedon < toni+openstac...@midokura.com> wrote: > Hi fellow Kurýrs, > > I would like to propose Taku Fukushima

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] Kuryr Open Tasks

2015-10-06 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, I have opened a Trello board to track all Kuryr assigned tasks and their assignee. In addition to all the non assigned tasks we have defined. You can visit and look at the board here [1]. Please email back if i missed you or any task that you are working on, or a task that you think

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][api] - attaching arbitrary key/value pairs to resources

2015-08-24 Thread Gal Sagie
I agree with Doug and Kevin, i think it is very hard for Neutron to keep the pace in every area of Networking abstraction, and i prefer this solution on code patching. I agree with Russell on the definition of Neutron end goal, but what good can it provide if clouds stop using Neutron because it

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Kuryr - Virtual sprint dates (September 8-9 (10))

2015-08-24 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, Based on the responses we received and based on the last IRC meeting it was decided that the Kuryr virtual sprint will take place in 8th and 9th of September (and maybe 10th). Time zone is not decided yet and we will decide it on our next meeting, it will probably be Europe-Asia time

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] DHCP configuration

2015-08-31 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, I went over the code and noticed that we have default DHCP configuration both in neutron/common/config.py (dhcp_lease_duration , dns_domain and dhcp_agent_notification) But also we have it in neutron/agent/dhcp/config.py (DHCP_AGENT_OPTS, DHCP_OPTS) I think we should consider

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Kuryr - Virtual Sprint (9/8 - 9/9)

2015-08-31 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello Everyone, We had an IRC meeting today [1] and we talked about the virtual sprint. I have opened an etherpad [2] so everyone can suggest and add points to the agenda. We will set the agenda topics end of this week or starting next week just before the sprint (depending on what progress we

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Un-addressed Port spec and implementation

2015-09-02 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, The un-addressed port spec [1] was approved for Liberty. I think this spec has good potential to provide very interesting solutions for NFV use cases but also for multi site connectivity and i would really want to see it move forward with the community. There are some issues we need

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Port forwarding

2015-09-02 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, I have searched and found many past efforts to implement port forwarding in Neutron. I have found two incomplete blueprints [1], [2] and an abandoned patch [3]. There is even a project in Stackforge [4], [5] that claims to implement this, but the L3 parts in it seems older then

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Allowing DNS suffix to be set per subnet (at least per tenant)

2015-09-03 Thread Gal Sagie
I am not sure if this address what you need specifically, but it would be worth checking these two approved liberty specs: 1) https://github.com/openstack/neutron-specs/blob/master/specs/liberty/internal-dns-resolution.rst 2)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Port forwarding

2015-09-08 Thread Gal Sagie
In a word, I think the "inside_addr" should be "subnet" or "host". > > Hope this is clear enough. > > Germy > > On Sun, Sep 6, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Germy, >> >> I am not sure i unde

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Port forwarding

2015-09-08 Thread Gal Sagie
d in the response body, for example, 4001 to 4003, also can just > return a base number(4000) and upper layer rework it. For example, 4000+1, > where 1 is the last number in the private IP address of VM1. > > Forgive my poor E. > Hope that's clear enough and i am happy to discuss i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Port forwarding

2015-09-05 Thread Gal Sagie
> add PF to ssh another. To a VPC(with 20 subnets?) admin, it's totally a > nightmare. > > Germy > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> I have searched and found many past efforts to implement

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] RFE Bugs - Add Tags to resources and Port Forwarding

2015-09-06 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, i wanted to remind the community some RFE's bugs that need review/processing 1) Add tags to Neutron resources RFE: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1489291 Spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/216021/ In terms of the RFE, i think the drivers team discussed this

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] RFE process question

2015-09-10 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi James, I think that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/216021/ might be what you are looking for. Please review and see that it fits your requierment. Hopefully this gets approved for next release and i can start working on it, if you would like to join and contribute (or anyone in your team) i

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ML2] ML2 late/early-cycle sprint announcement

2015-09-09 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi Sukhdev, The common sync framework is something i was also thinking about for some time now. I think its a very good idea and would love if i could participate in the talks (and hopefully the implementation as well) Thanks Gal. On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Sukhdev Kapur

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTL Non-Candidacy

2015-09-12 Thread Gal Sagie
Kyle, Thank you for all the great time as PTL, you set a high bar for the next person. I think the Neutron community was lucky to have you in this position, your devotion and passion to OpenStackt, to Neutron and to Open source is inspiring and one of the reasons i love this community. In my eyes

Re: [openstack-dev] [dragonflow] Low OVS version for Ubuntu

2015-09-17 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello Li Ma, Dragonflow uses OpenFlow1.3 to communicate with OVS and thats why we need OVS 2.3.1. As suggested you can build it from source. For Fedora 21 OVS2.3.1 is part of the default yum repository. You can ping me on IRC (gsagie at freenode) if you need any additional help how to compile

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] New cycle started. What are you up to, folks?

2015-10-01 Thread Gal Sagie
This is going to be busy cycle for me, but with many exciting and interesting topics: *Kuryr* Kuryr is starting to gain interest from the community and going to be demoed and presented in OpenStack Tokyo, i think all this positive feedback means we are on the right track and we have a very busy

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] New cycle started. What are you up to, folks?

2015-10-02 Thread Gal Sagie
/Kubernetes integrations by their own. [1] http://galsagie.github.io/sdn/openstack/docker/kuryr/neutron/2015/08/24/kuryr-part1/ On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 08:19:47AM +0300, Gal Sagie wrote: > > *OVN* > > >

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Port Forwarding API

2015-09-20 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, I have sent a spec [1] to resume the work on port forwarding API and reference implementation. Its currently marked as "WIP", however i raised some "TBD" questions for the community. The way i see port forwarding is an API that is very similar to floating IP API and implementation

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Kuryr - Spec

2015-09-18 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello everyone, We have a spec for project Kuryr in Neutron repository [1] , we have been iterating on it internally and with the great help and feedback from the Magnum team. I am glad to say that we reached a pretty good step where we have most of the Magnum team +1 the spec, i personally

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Port Forwarding API

2015-09-20 Thread Gal Sagie
g). > So we also need the port mapping configuration fields > > For the second use case, I have a question, does it support DVR? if VM1 > and VM2 are on > different compute nodes, how does it work? > > > > > 在 2015-09-20 14:26:23,"Gal Sagie" <gal.sa...@gm

[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Functional tests in the gate

2015-12-06 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, I want to write functional tests that will run in the gate but only after a devstack environment has finished. Basically i want to interact with a working enviorment, but i don't want the tests that i write to fail the python27 gate tests. (I guess like the Neutron full stack tests,

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Functional tests in the gate

2015-12-06 Thread Gal Sagie
VSTACK_GATE_TEMPEST=1 > export DEVSTACK_GATE_TEMPEST_NOTESTS=1 > first line tells to install tempest > and second tells that job should not run it > > and then 'post_test_hook' defines commands to run. > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com&

[openstack-dev] [openstack-infra] Using Neutron client in the gate

2015-12-10 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, I would like to run some "fullstack" integration tests for Kuryr and run them in the gate. For the tests i would like to use the Neutron client for communicating with the working devstack Neutron service. What is the best way to instantiate the client in terms of auth_url and

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dragonflow] - IRC Meeting tomorrow (12/14) - 0900 UTC

2015-12-13 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, We will have an IRC meeting tomorrow (Monday, 12/14) at 0900 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4 Please review the expected meeting agenda here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Dragonflow You can view last meeting action items and logs here:

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IRC Meeting - Tuesday 0300 UTC (12/15)

2015-12-13 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, I have updated the agenda for the upcoming Kuryr IRC meeting [1] Please review and add any additional topics you might want to cover. Also please go over last meeting action items [2] , there are still patches (IPAM) that are looking for review love :) Since this is the week we do

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dragonflow] - Documentation

2015-12-12 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, We have recently uploaded a big amount of documents and diagrams to Dragonflow repository in order to expose what we are doing and make it as simple as we can for new contributors and users to start using Dragonflow. I have created a wiki page for Dragonflow [1]. Some recommended

[openstack-dev] [Magnum][Kuryr] Help with using docker-python client in gate

2015-12-17 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello Everyone, We are trying to add some gate testing for Kuryr and hopefully convert these also to Rally plugins. What i am facing in the gate right now is this: I configure the docker client: self.docker_client = docker.Client( base_url='unix://var/run/docker.sock') And call this:

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Testing, Rally and Wiki

2015-12-10 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello everyone, As some of you have already noticed one of the top priorities for Kuryr this cycle is to get our CI and gate testing done. I have been working on creating the base for adding integration tests that will run in the gate in addition to our unit tests and functional testing. If you

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Testing, Rally and Wiki

2015-12-10 Thread Gal Sagie
ntext plugin and client and other parts that are >> probably needed by other projects (like Magnum) >> I think it would be great if we can combine forces on this. > > > What this context is going to do? > > > Best regards, > Boris Pavlovic > > On Thu, De

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dragonflow] - IRC Meeting Cancelled (1/11)

2016-01-04 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, Just wanted to let everyone know that we wont have a Dragonflow IRC meeting next week (Monday, 1/11) We will continue with the meetings the week after (1/18) Thanks Gal. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dragonflow] Security Groups Design for Scale

2015-12-29 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, We are iterating on a design document for Security Groups implementation in Dragonflow. [1] This design leverage the fact that Dragonflow distribute policy level abstraction to the local controllers and has Security Group as a first class citizen. The design tries to tackle the

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dragonflow] IRC Meeting tomorrow (1/4) - 0900 UTC

2016-01-02 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, We will have an IRC meeting tomorrow (Monday, 1/4) at 0900 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4 Please review the expected meeting agenda here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Dragonflow You can view last meeting action items and logs here:

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IRC Meeting - Monday (1/4) 1500 UTC (#openstack-meeting-4)

2016-01-03 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, The first Kuryr IRC meeting of this year is going to take place tomorrow :) I have updated the agenda for the upcoming meeting [1] Please review and add any additional topics you might want to cover. Last meeting action items can be seen here [2] See you there! [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Dragonflow] Support configuration of DB clusters

2015-12-25 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi Li Ma, This approach makes sense to me, i was also thinking about the ability for the user to specify additional arguments and parameters to the DB driver. Feel free to register a bug and work on that. Thanks Gal. On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Li Ma wrote: > Hi

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dragonflow] - IRC Meeting today (12/28) - 0900 UTC

2015-12-27 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, We will have an IRC meeting today (Monday, 12/28) at 0900 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4 Please review the expected meeting agenda here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Dragonflow You can view last meeting action items and logs here:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Dragonflow] Support configuration of DB clusters

2015-12-28 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi Li Ma, I think its a good idea. I suggest for first stage, pass the CONF as optional parameter in addition to the db_ip and db_port. This way you will have minimum code changes at first patch. If we see its working ok, we can later remove db_ip and db_port and adjust the other drivers in

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] [Dragonflow] Atomic update doesn't work with etcd-driver

2015-12-28 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi Li Ma, I haven't investigated the root problem yet as i seen it at the end of day yesterday. However if you look at this test : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/261997/ it verify that the correct number of flows are installed after a clean devstack process. What i noticed with this patch is

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IRC Meeting - Monday 1500 UTC (#openstack-meeting-4)

2015-12-21 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, I have updated the agenda for the upcoming Kuryr IRC meeting [1] Please review and add any additional topics you might want to cover. Last meeting action items can be seen here [2] I personally wont be able to attend the meeting and we expect low participant volume due to holidays

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-dev][Neutron] Is there a tool of generating network topology?

2015-12-21 Thread Gal Sagie
Depends what you mean "Network topology" , Horizon UI has virtual network topology graph/diagram. If you mean the physical topology, thats a bit harder but i remember there was a talk proposal for the previous summit on that area (i think garyk (CCed) was one of the proposed talkers so maybe he

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dragonflow] - IRC Meeting tomorrow (12/21) - 0900 UTC

2015-12-20 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, We will have an IRC meeting tomorrow (Monday, 12/21) at 0900 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4 Please review the expected meeting agenda here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Dragonflow You can view last meeting action items and logs here:

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] Progress Update and Kubernetes Integration

2015-12-28 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello everyone, Just wanted to give you all some progress update at what we have been doing in Kuryr, We conducted an IRC meeting today, you can see the logs here [1] 1) We got Docker pluggable IPAM support in Kuryr thanks to Vikas Choudhary, there are still some small points to address but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

2015-11-30 Thread Gal Sagie
To me, and i could got it wrong, the stadium means two main things: (At this point in time) 1) Remove/ease the burden of OpenStack governance and extra job for projects/drivers that implement Neutron and are "relatively small" This saves the projects that just want to implement Neutron to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Groups OVS conntrack support

2015-11-22 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi Fawad, >From what i could understand from Miguel Angel Ajo, someone is working on this integration and it is suppose to be delivered as part of Mitaka. I don't remember the person name, Miguel will sure update shortly. Gal. On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Fawad Khaliq

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] neutron-lib and dependencies in neutron reference implementation

2016-06-08 Thread Gal Sagie
For example references to the various different agents which are an implementation details to me On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Henry Gessau <hen...@gessau.net> wrote: > Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > I have recently came across

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] neutron-lib and dependencies in neutron reference implementation

2016-06-08 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, I have recently came across some missing constants in neutron-lib and sent a patch but i wanted to try and understand the scope of the lib. I see that the Neutron lib consist of many definitions which are actually part of the reference implementation and are not really "generic"

[openstack-dev] [Dragonflow] - No IRC meeting today (06/13)

2016-06-13 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, Sorry for the late notice but we will not have an IRC meeting today. We will continue the IRC meetings next week. Thanks Gal. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr][Magnum] - Kuryr nested containers and Magnum Integration

2016-06-21 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, I am writing this out to provide awareness and hopefully get some work started on the above topic. We have merged a spec about supporting nested containers and integration with Magnum some time ago [1] , Fawad (CCed) led this spec. We are now seeking for volunteers to start

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Proposal: Separate design summits from OpenStack conferences

2016-02-07 Thread Gal Sagie
If you compare the number of people that come to mid-cycles with the number of people that come to the summit and attend the design summit, i am sure (without knowing exact numbers) that there is a big difference in favor of the design summit. I also think that its important that users/operators

[openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IRC Meeting tomorrow (2/8) - 0300 UTC

2016-02-08 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello All, We will have an IRC meeting tomorrow (Tuesday, 2/8) at 0300 UTC in #openstack-meeting-4 Please review the expected meeting agenda here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meeting s/Kuryr You can view last meeting action items and logs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Distributed Multicast and IGMP Support in Dragonflow

2016-02-10 Thread Gal Sagie
This is a work we are doing in Dragonflow and is relatively simple to implement leveraging Dragonflow current infrastructure and reactive local controller. This will significantly reduce duplicating packets for IGMP aware VMs. and hence reduce multicast load. We would love to help and bring this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

2016-02-04 Thread Gal Sagie
. On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Assaf Muller <amul...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Assaf Muller <amul...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:33 AM, Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> As i have commented on the patch

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Dragonflow] - IRC Meeting Canceled (2/8)

2016-02-07 Thread Gal Sagie
Hello all, Since many members (and also myself) cant make it for tomorrows meeting, we have decided to cancel it. For any urgent matters, feel free to send your question to the mailing list. We will have a meeting next week (2/15) as usual. Thanks Gal

Re: [openstack-dev] [Kuryr] IRC Meeting tomorrow (2/9) - 0300 UTC

2016-02-08 Thread Gal Sagie
As Mike spotted, the date for the meeting is February 9!! and not the 8th in the original email Thanks for the correction! On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello All, > > We will have an IRC meeting tomorrow (Tuesday, 2/8) at 0300 UTC

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Evolving the stadium concept

2016-02-05 Thread Gal Sagie
ng related projects "near" the group of people that has the best context to review / help and comment, its obviously not working and thats fine, lets try something different... On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Armando M. <arma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 4 Februa

Re: [openstack-dev] [kuryr] Does Kuryr support multi-tenant

2016-01-25 Thread Gal Sagie
Hi Liping Mao, The question is what you mean by multi-tenancy, if you mean that different tenants each control their own bare-metal server then Kuryr already support this. (by tenant credential configuration) If what i think you mean, and thats running multi tenants on the same bare-metal then

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Integrating physical appliance into virtual infrastructure

2016-02-01 Thread Gal Sagie
There is a project that aims at solving your use cases (at least from a general view) Its called L2GW and uses OVSDB Hardware VTEP schema (which is supported by many physical appliances for switching capabilities) Some information: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/L2-GW There are also

  1   2   >