[openstack-dev] Oslo messaging vs zaqar

2014-09-20 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
Hi all, I'm just trying to understand the messaging strategy in openstack.It seems we have at least 2 messaging layers. Oslo.messaging and zaqar, Can someone explain to me why there are two? To quote from the zaqar faq : - How does Zaqar compare to oslo.messaging? oslo.messsaging is

Re: [openstack-dev] Oslo messaging vs zaqar

2014-09-22 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
So On 22/09/2014 10:01 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 20/09/14 04:17, Geoff O'Callaghan wrote: Hi all, I'm just trying to understand the messaging strategy in openstack.It seems we have at least 2 messaging layers. Oslo.messaging and zaqar, Can someone explain to me why

Re: [openstack-dev] Oslo messaging vs zaqar

2014-09-22 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
On 23/09/2014 1:59 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Geoff, do you expect all of our users to write all of their messaging code in Python? oslo.messaging is a _python_ library. Zaqar is a service with a REST API -- accessible to any application. No I do not. I am suggesting thaf a

Re: [openstack-dev] Oslo messaging vs zaqar

2014-09-23 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
On 23/09/2014 12:58 PM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Excerpts from Geoff O'Callaghan's message of 2014-09-22 17:30:47 -0700: On 23/09/2014 1:59 AM, Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote: Geoff, do you expect all of our users to write all of their messaging code in Python?

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] IRC logging

2015-01-15 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
On 13/01/2015 3:45 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: There's really no way to _force_ official logging on all project-related channels. People who are opposed to the idea simply move their conversations to new channels. They'll straddle the line between somewhat official looking and

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Mesos orchestration as discussed at mid cycle (action required from core reviewers)

2015-11-02 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
I'm not a core dev but this is a fantastic idea which will have a huge benefit to openstack. Tks Geoff __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Outcome of distributed lock manager discussion @ the summit

2015-11-02 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
On 03/11/2015 1:28 PM, "Robert Collins" wrote: > > Hi, at the summit we had a big session on distributed lock managers (DLMs). Awesome. > > I'd just like to highlight the conclusions we came to in the session ( >

Re: [openstack-dev] Scheduler proposal

2015-10-11 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
On 11/10/2015 6:25 PM, "Clint Byrum" wrote: > > Excerpts from Boris Pavlovic's message of 2015-10-11 00:02:39 -0700: > > 2Everybody, > > > > Just curios why we need such complexity. > > > > > > Let's take a look from other side: > > 1) Information about all hosts (even in case

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-23 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
Surely openstack is defined by it’s capabilities and interfaces rather than it’s internals. Given the simplistic view that openstack is a collection of micro services connected by well defined api’s does it really matter what code is used inside that micro service (or macro service )? If

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-23 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
> On 24 May 2016, at 2:04 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Geoff O'Callaghan's message of 2016-05-24 10:59:13 +1000: >> Surely openstack is defined by it’s capabilities and interfaces rather than >> it’s internals. Given the simplistic view that openstack is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

2016-05-23 Thread Geoff O'Callaghan
> On 24 May 2016, at 3:13 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > [snip] > those other needs. Grab a python developer, land some code, and your > feature is there. s/python/whateverlanguage/ > >> I also never said, ship the source code and say ‘good luck’. What I did >> imply was,