Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Simple proposal for stabilizing new features in-tree

2014-08-08 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Hi, Robert Kukura's proposal does address the following: 1. Make it explicit to the user that an API is in preview until it's moved out of the preview directories 2. One of the criteria to accept a BP for preview is for the functionality to be optional via configuration. This will not impact the

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: FW: [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

2014-08-08 Thread Hemanth Ravi
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote: One advantage of the service plugin is that one can leverage the neutron common framework such as Keystone authentication where common scoping is done. It would be important in the policy type of framework to have such

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: FW: [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

2014-08-11 Thread Hemanth Ravi
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote: One advantage of the service plugin is that one can leverage the neutron common framework such as Keystone authentication where common scoping is done.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Update on third party CI in Neutron

2014-08-12 Thread Hemanth Ravi
. Regards, -hemanth On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:02 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Hemanth Ravi hemanthrav...@gmail.com wrote: Kyle, One Convergence CI has been fixed (setup issue) and is running without the failures for ~10 days now. Updated

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Update on third party CI in Neutron

2014-08-12 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Anita, Yes, I'm the contact for One Convergence CI. Thanks, -hemanth On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 08/12/2014 03:23 PM, Hemanth Ravi wrote: Kyle, One Convergence third-party CI is failing due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-18 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Edgar, Our CI is running the tests (non voting), but don't see it listed on the review for any patch. Is this due to missing logs? I would like to confirm this is the issue, will resolve this. Thanks, -hemanth On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are required to be run

2014-08-21 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Edgar, CI name: One Convergence CI The logs issue has been fixed and earlier tests were failing due to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114146 For reference: 1. Please take a look at the vote on patchset 7 in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114968/ 2. Logs at

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party-testing] Tests against vendor controller

2013-12-26 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Hi, We are developing a neutron plugin that works with our network controller. Do we need to have 2 sets of tests for the plugin i) tests that can be run against the network controller in our third party test setup (to vote on changes to the plugin) ii) tests that can be run in the OpenStack test

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][3rd Party Testing] Jenkins setup

2014-01-15 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Hi, Below are the set of steps we are using for Jenkins setup and would like some clarifications reg some of the steps. Under Jenkins/Configure 1. Source Code Management: to be git and point to the devstack URL 2. Build Triggers: Gerrit Event 3. Build/Execute Shell: Sequence of

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party-testing] Sharing information

2014-01-15 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Hi, Resending on this thread Below are the set of steps we are using for Jenkins setup and would like some clarifications reg some of the steps. Under Jenkins/Configure 1. Source Code Management: to be git and point to the devstack URL 2. Build Triggers: Gerrit Event 3.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Interest in discussing vendor plugins for L3 services?

2014-02-03 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Hi, I would be interested in this discussion. Below are some time slot suggestions: Mon: 19:00, 20:00 UTC (11:00, 12:00 PST) Wed: 20:00, 21:00 UTC (12:00, 13:00 PST) Thu: 19:00, 20:00, 21:00 UTC (11:00, 12:00, 13:00 PST) Thanks, -hemanth On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Paul Michali

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding package to requirements.txt

2014-02-03 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Hi, We are in the process of submitting a third party Neutron plugin that uses urllib3 for the connection pooling feature available in urllib3. httplib2 doesn't provide this capability. Is it possible to add urllib3 to requirements.txt? If this is OK, please advise on the process to add this.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Adding package to requirements.txt

2014-02-03 Thread Hemanth Ravi
, Hemanth Ravi hemanthrav...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, We are in the process of submitting a third party Neutron plugin that uses urllib3 for the connection pooling feature available in urllib3. httplib2 doesn't provide this capability. Is it possible to add urllib3 to requirements.txt

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] adding handler to neutron logger in neutron.openstack.common

2014-02-13 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Hi, We are in the process of submitting a neutron third-party plugin and need some advise on logging configuration to resolve the review comments for this. The plugin currently defines a log format and adds a log handler to forward logs to a remote syslog server in this format. We would like to

Re: [openstack-dev] False Positive testing for 3rd party CI

2014-02-23 Thread Hemanth Ravi
One Convergence CI did report the third party tests as failed, but is configured not to vote. Should we turn on the voting? Thanks, -hemanth On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote: Aaron, I was thinking the same thing recently with this patch [1]. Patch

[openstack-dev] HK Neutron Icehouse Design Meetings

2013-10-29 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Hi, Is there a schedule published for the Neutron Icehouse design meetings listed at http://summit.openstack.org/ Thanks, -hemanth ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Update on third party CI in Neutron

2014-07-28 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Kyle, One Convergence CI has been fixed (setup issue) and is running without the failures for ~10 days now. Updated the etherpad. Thanks, -hemanth On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Fawad Khaliq fa...@plumgrid.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][policy] Bridging the 2-group gap in group policy

2014-07-30 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Hi, Adding this CLI command seems to be a good way to provide support for the second model. This can be submitted as a new review patch to work through the approaches to implement this. I suggest the current CLI patch [1] be reviewed for the existing spec and completed. Ryan, would it possible

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

2014-08-04 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Hi, I believe that the API has been reviewed well both for its usecases and correctness. And the blueprint has been approved after sufficient exposure of the API in the community. The best way to enable users to adopt GBP is to introduce this in Juno rather than as a project in StackForge. Just

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: FW: [Neutron] Group Based Policy and the way forward

2014-08-06 Thread Hemanth Ravi
Hi, I agree that Option 1 would be best way to make the GBP API available to operators and to make forward progress with the API. Regards, -hemanth On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Ivar Lazzaro ivarlazz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Pedro, I agree that having as much users/operators as possible

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Combination of Heat ResourceGroup(index) with Fn::Select doesnt work ?

2014-10-21 Thread Hemanth Ravi
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 21/10/14 14:05, Subrahmanyam Ongole wrote: Hi We are in fact using OS::Neutron::PoolMember resource. I guess ResourceGroup is the only iterative construct in Heat. Is the use case supported today? I think this is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Combination of Heat ResourceGroup(index) with Fn::Select doesnt work ?

2014-10-21 Thread Hemanth Ravi
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Hemanth Ravi hemanthrav...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote: On 21/10/14 14:05, Subrahmanyam Ongole wrote: Hi We are in fact using OS::Neutron::PoolMember resource. I guess ResourceGroup is the only